This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Other Versions of this Article: AEM.01612-07v1 74/2/462    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Anilkumar, K. J. Articles by Moar, W. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Anilkumar, K. J. Articles by Moar, W. J. Agricola Articles by Anilkumar, K. J. Articles by Moar, W. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2008, p. 462-469, Vol. 74, No. 2
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.01612-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Production and Characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac-Resistant Cotton Bollworm Helicoverpa zea (Boddie)

Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849,¹ Department of Genetics, University of Valencia, Dr. Moliner 50, 46100 Burjassot (Valencia), Spain,² Department of Biochemistry, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4935,³ Monsanto Company, 700 Chesterfield Parkway North, St. Louis, Missouri 63017⁴

Received 15 July 2007/ Accepted 6 November 2007

Laboratory-selected Bacillus thuringiensis-resistant colonies are important tools for elucidating B. thuringiensis resistance mechanisms. However, cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa zea, a target pest of transgenic corn and cotton expressing B. thuringiensis Cry1Ac (Bt corn and cotton), has proven difficult to select for stable resistance. Two populations of H. zea (AR and MR), resistant to the B. thuringiensis protein found in all commercial Bt cotton varieties (Cry1Ac), were established by selection with Cry1Ac activated toxin (AR) or MVP II (MR). Cry1Ac toxin reflects the form ingested by H. zea when feeding on Bt cotton, whereas MVP II is a Cry1Ac formulation used for resistance selection and monitoring. The resistance ratio (RR) for AR exceeded 100-fold after 11 generations and has been maintained at this level for nine generations. This is the first report of stable Cry1Ac resistance in H. zea. MR crashed after 11 generations, reaching only an RR of 12. AR was only partially cross-resistant to MVP II, suggesting that MVP II does not have the same Cry1Ac selection pressure as Cry1Ac toxin against H. zea and that proteases may be involved with resistance. AR was highly cross-resistant to Cry1Ab toxin but only slightly cross-resistant to Cry1Ab expressing corn leaf powder. AR was not cross-resistant to Cry2Aa2, Cry2Ab2-expressing corn leaf powder, Vip3A, and cypermethrin. Toxin-binding assays showed no significant differences, indicating that resistance was not linked to a reduction in binding. These results aid in understanding why this pest has not evolved B. thuringiensis resistance, and highlight the need to choose carefully the form of B. thuringiensis protein used in experiments.

Published ahead of print on 16 November 2007.