AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AEM.02897-07v1
74/8/2488    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cornick, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by VuKhac, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cornick, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by VuKhac, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cornick, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by VuKhac, H.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2008, p. 2488-2491, Vol. 74, No. 8
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02897-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Indirect Transmission of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Occurs Readily among Swine but Not among Sheep{triangledown}

Nancy A. Cornick* and Hung VuKhac{dagger}

Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Preventive Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50010

Received 21 December 2007/ Accepted 21 February 2008

Transmission of Escherichia coli O157:H7 among reservoir animals is generally thought to occur either by direct contact between a naïve animal and an infected animal or by consumption of food or water containing the organism. Although ruminants are considered the major reservoir, there are two reports of human infections caused by E. coli O157:H7 linked to the consumption of pork products or to the contamination of fresh produce by swine manure. The objective of this study was to determine whether E. coli O157:H7 could be transmitted to naïve animals, both sheep and swine, that did not have any direct contact with an infected donor animal. We recovered E. coli O157:H7 from 10/10 pigs with nose-to-nose contact with the infected donor or animals adjacent to the donor and from 5/6 naïve pigs that were penned in the same room as the donor pig but 10 to 20 ft away. In contrast, when the experiment was repeated with sheep, E. coli O157:H7 was recovered from 4/6 animals that had nose-to-nose contact with the infected donor or adjacent animals and from 0/6 naïve animals penned 10 to 20 ft away from the donor. These results suggest that E. coli O157:H7 is readily transmitted among swine and that transmission can occur by the creation of contaminated aerosols.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: 2130 Vet Med Bldg., Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010. Phone: (515) 294-6499. Fax: (515) 294-8500. E-mail: ncornick{at}iastate.edu

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 29 February 2008.

{dagger} Present address: Hung VuKhac, 6024 AGC Bldg., Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2008, p. 2488-2491, Vol. 74, No. 8
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02897-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.