This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBlanc, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Mohn, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LeBlanc, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Mohn, W. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by LeBlanc, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Mohn, W. W.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2008, p. 2627-2636, Vol. 74, No. 9
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02711-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Global Response to Desiccation Stress in the Soil Actinomycete Rhodococcus jostii RHA1{triangledown} ,{dagger}

Justin C. LeBlanc, Edmilson R. Gonçalves,{ddagger} and William W. Mohn*

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Life Sciences Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Received 30 November 2007/ Accepted 28 February 2008

Rhodococcus jostii RHA1 is a soil-residing actinomycete with many favorable metabolic capabilities that make it an ideal candidate for the bioremediation of contaminated soils. Arguably the most basic requirement for life is water, yet some nonsporulating bacteria, like RHA1, can survive lengthy droughts. Here we report the first transcriptomic analysis of a gram-positive bacterium during desiccation. Filtered RHA1 cells incubated at either low relative humidity (20%), as an air-drying treatment, or high relative humidity (100%), as a control, were transcriptionally profiled over a comprehensive time series. Also, the morphology of RHA1 cells was characterized by cryofixation scanning electron microscopy during each treatment. Desiccation resulted in a transcriptional response of approximately 8 times more differentially regulated genes than in the control (819 versus 106 genes, respectively). Genes that were differentially expressed during only the desiccation treatment primarily had expression profiles that were maximally up-regulated upon complete drying of the cells. The microarray expression ratios for some of the highly up-regulated genes were verified by reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR. These genes included dps1, encoding an oxidative stress protection protein which has not previously been directly associated with desiccation, and the two genes encoding sigma factors SigF1 and SigF3, possibly involved in the regulatory response to desiccation. RHA1 cells also induced the biosynthetic pathway for the compatible solute ectoine. These desiccation-specific responses represent the best candidates for important mechanisms of desiccation resistance in RHA1.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Life Sciences Institute, University of British Columbia, 2350 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada. Phone: (604) 822-4285. Fax: (604) 822-6041. E-mail: wmohn{at}interchange.ubc.ca

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 7 March 2008.

{dagger} Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.

{ddagger} Present address: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Centro de Ciências da Vida—Faculdade de Ciências Biologicas, Av. John Boyd Dunlop, s/n, Campinas-São Paulo—CEP 13.059-900, Brazil.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2008, p. 2627-2636, Vol. 74, No. 9
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02711-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.