This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drolet, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Derner, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drolet, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Derner, J. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Drolet, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Derner, J. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2009, p. 3029-3033, Vol. 75, No. 10
0099-2240/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02368-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Infection of Melanoplus sanguinipes Grasshoppers following Ingestion of Rangeland Plant Species Harboring Vesicular Stomatitis Virus{triangledown}

Barbara S. Drolet,1* Melissa A. Stuart,1 and Justin D. Derner2

USDA, ARS, Arthropod-Borne Animal Diseases Research Laboratory, Laramie,1 USDA, ARS, High Plains Grasslands Research Station, Cheyenne, Wyoming2

Received 15 October 2008/ Accepted 9 March 2009

Knowledge of the many mechanisms of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) transmission is critical for understanding of the epidemiology of sporadic disease outbreaks in the western United States. Migratory grasshoppers [Melanoplus sanguinipes (Fabricius)] have been implicated as reservoirs and mechanical vectors of VSV. The grasshopper-cattle-grasshopper transmission cycle is based on the assumptions that (i) virus shed from clinically infected animals would contaminate pasture plants and remain infectious on plant surfaces and (ii) grasshoppers would become infected by eating the virus-contaminated plants. Our objectives were to determine the stability of VSV on common plant species of U.S. Northern Plains rangelands and to assess the potential of these plant species as a source of virus for grasshoppers. Fourteen plant species were exposed to VSV and assayed for infectious virus over time (0 to 24 h). The frequency of viable virus recovery at 24 h postexposure was as high as 73%. The two most common plant species in Northern Plains rangelands (western wheatgrass [Pascopyrum smithii] and needle and thread [Hesperostipa comata]) were fed to groups of grasshoppers. At 3 weeks postfeeding, the grasshopper infection rate was 44 to 50%. Exposure of VSV to a commonly used grasshopper pesticide resulted in complete viral inactivation. This is the first report demonstrating the stability of VSV on rangeland plant surfaces, and it suggests that a significant window of opportunity exists for grasshoppers to ingest VSV from contaminated plants. The use of grasshopper pesticides on pastures would decrease the incidence of a virus-amplifying mechanical vector and might also decontaminate pastures, thereby decreasing the inter- and intraherd spread of VSV.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: USDA, ARS, Arthropod-Borne Animal Diseases Research Laboratory, AG-5031, Dept. 3354, 1000 E. University Ave., Laramie, WY 82071. Phone: (307) 766-3651. Fax: (307) 766-3500. E-mail: barbara.drolet{at}ars.usda.gov

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 13 March 2009.

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2009, p. 3029-3033, Vol. 75, No. 10
0099-2240/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02368-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»