This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mieszkin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gourmelon, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mieszkin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gourmelon, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mieszkin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gourmelon, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2009, p. 3045-3054, Vol. 75, No. 10
0099-2240/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02343-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Estimation of Pig Fecal Contamination in a River Catchment by Real-Time PCR Using Two Pig-Specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA Genetic Markers{triangledown}

Sophie Mieszkin,1 Jean-Pierre Furet,2 Gérard Corthier,2 and Michèle Gourmelon1*

Ifremer EMP, Laboratoire de Microbiologie, 29280 Plouzané, France,1 Unité d'Ecologie et de Physiologie du Système Digestif (UEPSD), INRA, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas Cedex, France2

Received 13 October 2008/ Accepted 6 March 2009

The microbiological quality of coastal or river water can be affected by fecal contamination from human or animal sources. To discriminate pig fecal pollution from other pollution, a library-independent microbial source tracking method targeting Bacteroidales host-specific 16S rRNA gene markers by real-time PCR was designed. Two pig-specific Bacteroidales markers (Pig-1-Bac and Pig-2-Bac) were designed using 16S rRNA gene Bacteroidales clone libraries from pig feces and slurry. For these two pig markers, 98 to 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity were obtained when tested by TaqMan real-time PCR. A decrease in the concentrations of Pig-1-Bac and Pig-2-Bac markers was observed throughout the slurry treatment chain. The two newly designed pig-specific Bacteroidales markers, plus the human-specific (HF183) and ruminant-specific (BacR) Bacteroidales markers, were then applied to river water samples (n = 24) representing 14 different sites from the French Daoulas River catchment (Brittany, France). Pig-1-Bac and Pig-2-Bac were quantified in 25% and 62.5%, respectively, of samples collected around pig farms, with concentrations ranging from 3.6 to 4.1 log10 copies per 100 ml of water. They were detected in water samples collected downstream from pig farms but never detected near cattle farms. HF183 was quantified in 90% of water samples collected downstream near Daoulas town, with concentrations ranging between 3.6 and 4.4 log10 copies per 100 ml of water, and BacR in all water samples collected around cattle farms, with concentrations ranging between 4.6 and 6.0 log10 copies per 100 ml of water. The results of this study highlight that pig fecal contamination was not as frequent as human or bovine fecal contamination and that fecal pollution generally came from multiple origins. The two pig-specific Bacteroidales markers can be applied to environmental water samples to detect pig fecal pollution.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Ifremer EMP, Laboratoire de Microbiologie, 29280 Plouzané, France. Phone: (33) 2 98 22 45 76. Fax: (33) 2 98 22 45 94. E-mail: Michele.Gourmelon{at}ifremer.fr

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 27 March 2009.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2009, p. 3045-3054, Vol. 75, No. 10
0099-2240/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02343-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.