This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, N.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, N.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, D. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, N.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, D. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2009, p. 1121-1128, Vol. 75, No. 4
0099-2240/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02359-07
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Molecular Ecological Analysis of Fecal Bacterial Populations from Term Infants Fed Formula Supplemented with Selected Blends of Prebiotics{triangledown}

Noriko Nakamura,1,2* H. Rex Gaskins,1,2,3,4 Chad T. Collier,3 Gerardo M. Nava,1,2 Deshanie Rai,5 Bryon Petschow,6 W. Michael Russell,5 Cheryl Harris,5 Roderick I. Mackie,1,2,3 Jennifer L. Wampler,5 and D. Carey Walker5

Division of Nutritional Sciences,1 Institute for Genomic Biology,2 Department of Animal Sciences,3 Department of Pathobiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois,4 Mead Johnson & Company, Evansville, Indiana,5 Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Princeton, New Jersey6

Received 19 October 2007/ Accepted 14 November 2008

Supplementation of infant formulas with prebiotic ingredients continues the effort to mimic functional properties of human milk. In this double-blind, controlled, 28-day study, healthy term infants received control formula (control group; n = 25) or control formula supplemented with polydextrose (PDX) and galactooligosaccharide (GOS) (4 g/liter) (PG4 group; n = 27) or with PDX, GOS, and lactulose (LOS) (either 4 g/liter [PGL4 group; n = 27] or 8 g/liter [PGL8 group; n = 25]). A parallel breast-fed group (BF group) (n = 30) was included. Stool characteristics, formula tolerance, and adverse events were monitored. Fecal bacterial subpopulations were evaluated by culture-based selective enumeration (Enterobacteriaceae), quantitative real-time PCR (Clostridium clusters I, XI, and XIV, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (Bifidobacterium). Fecal bacterial community profiles were examined by using 16S rRNA gene PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. The daily stool consistency was significantly softer or looser in the BF group than in all of the groups that received formula. The formulas were well tolerated, and the incidences of adverse events did not differ among feeding groups. Few significant changes in bacterial subpopulations were observed at any time point. The bacterial communities were stable; individual profiles tended to cluster by subject rather than by group. Post hoc analysis, however, demonstrated that the bacterial community profiles for subjects in the BF, PG4, PGL4, and PGL8 groups that first received formula at a younger age were less stable than the profiles for subjects in the same groups that received formula at an older age, but there was no difference for the control group. These data indicate that formulas containing PDX, GOS, and LOS blends are more likely to influence gut microbes when administration is begun in early infancy and justify further investigation of the age-related effects of these blends on fecal microbiota.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: University of Illinois, 1207 W. Gregory Drive, Urbana, IL 61801. Phone: (217) 244-3163. Fax: (217) 333-8804. E-mail: nnakamur{at}illinois.edu

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 16 December 2008.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2009, p. 1121-1128, Vol. 75, No. 4
0099-2240/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02359-07
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.