AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 8 June 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bibbal, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bousquet-Mélou, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bibbal, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bousquet-Mélou, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bibbal, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bousquet-Mélou, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.00252-07
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Impact of three ampicillin dosage regimens on selection of ampicillin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae and excretion of blaTEM genes in swine feces

D. Bibbal, V. Dupouy, J. P. Ferré, P. L. Toutain, O. Fayet, M. F. Prère, and A. Bousquet-Mélou*

UMR181 Physiopathologie et Toxicologie Expérimentales, INRA, ENVT, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 23 Chemin des Capelles, BP 87 614, 31076 Toulouse Cedex 3, France.; UMR5100 Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires, CNRS, UPS, Laboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse Cedex, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: a.bousquet-melou{at}envt.fr.


arrow
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of three ampicillin dosage regimens on ampicillin resistance among Enterobacteriaceae recovered from swine feces using phenotypic and genotypic approaches. Phenotypically, ampicillin resistance was determined from the percentage of resistant Enterobacteriaceae and MICs of E. coli isolates. The pool of ampicillin resistance genes was also monitored by quantification of blaTEM genes, which code for the most frequently produced {beta}-lactamases in Gram-negative bacteria, using a newly-developed real-time PCR assay. Ampicillin was administered intramuscularly and by oral route to fed or fasted pigs for 7 days at 20 mg/kg. The average percentage of resistant Enterobacteriaceae before treatment was between 2.5% and 12% and blaTEM genes quantities were below 107 copies/g of feces. By days four and seven, the percentage of resistant Enterobacteriaceae exceeded 50% in all treated groups, with some highly resistant strains (MIC>256µg/mL). In the control group, blaTEM genes quantities fluctuated between 104 - 106 copies/g of feces, whereas they fluctuated between 106-108 and 107-109 copies/g of feces for intramuscular and oral routes, respectively. Whereas phenotypic evaluations did not discriminate between the three ampicillin dosage regimens, blaTEM genes quantification was able to differentiate between the effects of two routes of ampicillin administration. Our results suggest that fecal blaTEM genes quantification provides a sensitive tool to evaluate the impact of ampicillin administration on the selection of ampicillin resistance in the digestive microflora and its dissemination in the environment.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Alexander, T. W., Reuter, T., Sharma, R., Yanke, L. J., Topp, E., McAllister, T. A. (2009). Longitudinal Characterization of Resistant Escherichia coli in Fecal Deposits from Cattle Fed Subtherapeutic Levels of Antimicrobials. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 7125-7134 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bibbal, D., Dupouy, V., Prere, M. F., Toutain, P. L., Bousquet-Melou, A. (2009). Relatedness of Escherichia coli Strains with Different Susceptibility Phenotypes Isolated from Swine Feces during Ampicillin Treatment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 2999-3006 [Abstract] [Full Text]