AEM Tips for Better Browsing
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 25 April 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spaan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wouters, I. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spaan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wouters, I. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Spaan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wouters, I. M.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.02537-07
Copyright (c) 2008, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Effect of extraction and assay media in the analysis of airborne endotoxin

Suzanne Spaan, Gert Doekes, Dick Heederik, Peter S. Thorne, and Inge M. Wouters*

Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), division of Environmental Epidemiology (EEPI), Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Business Unit Quality and Safety, division Food & Chemical Risk Analysis, TNO Quality of Life, Zeist, the Netherlands; Environmental Health Sciences Research Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: I.M.Wouters{at}uu.nl.


   Abstract

Measurement of airborne endotoxin is thus far not standardized. Earlier studies reported higher endotoxin yields when Tween-20 was added to media used for filter extraction and in the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) assay. This study compared four common media, and assessed the effects of Tween during extraction and analysis separately.

Parallel airborne samples from 5 work environments (n=250) were used to compare four media (pyrogen-free water (PFW), PFW-Tween-20, PFW-Tris and PFW-triethylamine-phosphate (TAP)) and extraction for 10 or 60 minutes. A subset of the extracts in PFW or PFW-Tween (n=40) were analyzed in parallel LAL assays with PFW or PFW-Tween as the assay medium.

Compared to the reference procedure (PFW, 60 min shaking), shorter extraction or presence of Tris produced similar results. Use of PFW-TAP showed overall lower yields and a deviant calibration curve. Tween in the extraction medium resulted in significantly (p<0.05) higher endotoxin yields from all dust types, independent of the effect of Tween in the assay. Tween in the LAL assay, however, also strongly inhibited the reactivity of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) standard, thus shifting the calibration curve to higher values. Inhibition of LPS in test samples was less pronounced and varied between dust sources, resulting in enhanced calculated concentrations. This assay effect could be circumvented by diluting extracts at least 50-fold before the LAL assay.

In conclusion, of the media tested, only Tween enhances the endotoxin extraction efficiency from airborne samples in a consistent manner. We recommend extraction in PFW-Tween combined with dilution and LAL analysis in PFW.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.