AEM Try MCB online
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 25 April 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayrhofer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kneifel, W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayrhofer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kneifel, W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mayrhofer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kneifel, W.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.02849-07
Copyright (c) 2008, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of broth microdilution, E-test, and agar disk diffusion methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Lactobacillus acidophilus group members

Sigrid Mayrhofer, Konrad J. Domig*, Christiane Mair, Ulrike Zitz, Geert Huys, and Wolfgang Kneifel

BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Dept. of Food Science and Technology, Division of Food Microbiology and Hygiene, Gregor Mendel Straße 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria; Division of Food Quality Assurance, Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria; UGent - Ghent University, Faculty of Sciences, Laboratory of Microbiology, K. L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Gent, Belgium

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: konrad.domig{at}boku.ac.at.


   Abstract

In recent years, the absence of acquired antimicrobial resistance has become an important criterion to evaluate the biosafety of lactobacilli used as industrial starter or probiotic cultures. At present, however, standards for susceptibility testing of Lactobacillus strains or approved guidelines for interpreting the test results are not available. Hence, this study was carried out to contribute to the establishment of a standardized procedure for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of lactobacilli. The results obtained by testing 104 strains of the Lactobacillus acidophilus group were compared based on broth microdilution, disk diffusion and Etest. Except for some specific agent-related effects, agreement between MIC values resulting from the broth microdilution method and the Etest was good. In addition, inhibition zone diameters determined with disk diffusion correlated well with MICs of Etest and broth microdilution.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.