Previous Article | Next Article 
Appl Environ Microbiol, March 1998, p. 1161-1162, Vol. 64, No. 3
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
A Rapid Method for Screening Large Numbers of
Environmental Microorganisms for Antiviral Activity
Carlo
Maullu,
Giorgio
Lampis,
Delia
Deidda,
Sabrina
Petruzzelli, and
Raffaello
Pompei*
Cattedra di Microbiologia Applicata,
Università degli Studi di Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
Received 22 May 1997/Accepted 9 December 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
A new method for screening microbial colonies endowed with
antiviral activity is described. It is based on close contact between microbial agar cultures and agar-covered virus-infected-cell monolayers and allows the screening of large numbers of colonies in just a few
months.
 |
TEXT |
In the last few years, more and more
efforts have been made by pharmaceutical companies and university
research centers to find safe and efficient drugs for the treatment of
viral respiratory diseases, herpesvirus infections, and in particular
retroviral infections (1, 8, 10). New types of
antiviral compounds have been discovered, and novel, more potent, and
selective derivatives of known compounds have been synthesized (9,
11, 14, 15).
The screening of natural products from microorganisms, plants, and
algae, etc., still promises results, and some new active compounds have
recently been described (3, 4, 12, 13).
One of the main problems in screening antiviral products from
environment microorganisms is the difficulty of testing a high number
of colonies in a short time, which requires that infected-cell cultures
be challenged with microbial extracts.
With the aim of overcoming this problem, we devised a very simple
method of screening microbial environmental colonies grown on suitable
media directly on virus-infected-cell monolayers.
Vero, HEp2, MDCK, and Flow 2002 cells (all from ICN-Flow) were used for
growing and plaquing cytopathic viruses and also for cytotoxic assays.
Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), HSV-2, vaccinia virus, poliovirus
Sabin type 1, influenza A virus (strain WSN), and vesicular stomatitis
virus were used for the screenings. All were purchased from the
National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, Md.). The rich agar (AR)
medium used for growing environmental microorganisms in the screening
of antiviral activity had the following composition: 2 g of yeast
extract, 10 g of Casamino Acids, 4 g of soluble starch,
11 g of purified agar (Oxoid), 6 g of NaCl, 0.4 g of
KCl, 0.2 g of CaCl2 · 2H2O, and
0.1 g of MgSO4 · 7H2O in 1 liter of
deionized water. This medium was capable of supporting the growth of
most aerobic environmental microorganisms in 3 to 5 days at 25 to
28°C. The toxicity of AR medium on cell monolayers was minimal
(5).
The various steps of the screening test for antiviral activity in
environmental microorganisms are indicated in Fig.
1. Environmental samples of water and
soil, animal feces, and other substances were diluted in normal saline
and cultured in 9-cm-diameter petri dishes (with a thickness of about 6 mm) containing 20 ml of atoxic AR medium. The cultures were kept for 3 to 5 days at 25 to 28°C, until between 200 and 300 microbial colonies
per plate were grown. In the bottom of the medium, a 9-cm-diameter
dialysis membrane (molecular size exclusion, 10,000 Da; Medicell
International Ltd., London, United Kingdom), which had been prepared
previously with two margins jutting out at opposite sides, carefully
washed, and sterilized by autoclaving at 121°C for 15 min, was
positioned (Fig. 1A). The dialysis membrane allowed us not only to lift
and move the agar culture but also to avoid aspecific toxicity due to
bacterial hydrolytic enzymes. After colony growth, an entire culture
was picked up (Fig. 1B) and put onto a cell monolayer in a
10-cm-diameter petri dish (Fig. 1C) which had previously been infected
with a virus (HSV-1, HSV-2, poliovirus Sabin type 1, influenza A virus
[WSN], vaccinia virus, or vesicular stomatitis virus) and covered
with 20 ml of purified-agar (Oxoid)-solidified culture medium (Fig.
1D). After 20 to 30 min of contact, the microbial culture was removed
(Fig. 1E) and saved and the cell monolayer was incubated for a further
2 to 3 days, after which the viral plaques were stained with neutral
red and counted (Fig. 1F). Zones of inhibition of the viral plaques
were scored, and the microbial colonies corresponding to the zones of
inhibition were isolated in pure culture for further characterization
(2).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Schematic representation of our method of rapidly
screening environmental microbial colonies for antiviral activity. The
steps of the screening method are as follows: environmental microbes
are cultured on AR agar plates (A); the microbial culture is picked up
by using the edges of a dialysis membrane (B) and transferred onto an
agar-covered virus-infected-cell monolayer (C); the colony-containing
agar slant is placed onto the virus-infected agar-covered cells (D);
the upper colony-containing agar culture is removed and saved, and the
cell culture is incubated for 2 to 3 days (E); and cell monolayers are
stained to show viral plaques and zones of plaque inhibition (F).
|
|
All the microbial colonies corresponding to the halo of viral plaque
reduction were picked up and isolated in pure culture in a new plate of
AR medium for characterization. A slight modification of the
above-described method was used for this purpose. A virus-infected subconfluent cell monolayer was used, with about one-third of the
number of cells used in the first screening, for the precise evaluation
of cytotoxic activity. Onto these cultures we put an AR disk on which
single colonies had been grown and then cut with the edge of a
10-mm-diameter glass tube. After 20 to 30 min of contact, the agar
disks supporting the microbial colonies were removed and the cell
cultures were incubated for 2 to 3 days until the viral plaques were
evident and the cell monolayer became confluent.
Selectivity of the active microbial products appeared as (i) a lack of
morphological alteration of cells, (ii) a growth rate of cells which
was similar to that of control cells and reached confluence within 3 days, and (iii) a normal uptake of vital stain used to bring the viral
plaques into evidence. Biologically active microorganisms underwent a
process of extraction and purification of their antiviral substances
(5, 6).
Table 1 reports the results achieved in 6 months of screening by this rapid method. About 105
microbial colonies were analyzed in all. This means that one technician
was able to process between 20 and 30 plates per week for one or two
viruses. Each microbial culture plate was generally used for only one
cell-virus combination. Good results could be obtained with all the
different viruses and cell lines indicated above, although more than
80% of assays were performed with both a single DNA virus
(HSV-1) and a single RNA virus (poliovirus Sabin type 1).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Approximate numbers of microbial colonies screened in 6 months by a single operator and isolation of microorganisms with
apparent antiviral activities
|
|
Among the microbial colonies selected, five new chemical formulae
were identified and their chemicals were purified from some bacilli and bacteria (5-7). The original new
compound
5-(p-methoxy-phenyl)-3-acetate-1,2,4-pentatriole (Karalicin) was patented.
The novel method of screening microbial colonies for antiviral
activities presented in this work shows interesting advantages: an ease
of execution and the possibility of analyzing greater numbers of
microbial colonies than the number described so far in any report. In
fact, in our test, it is possible to challenge microbial cultures
directly with agar-covered infected-cell monolayers and obtain results
which can be read within 2 to 3 days. With this system it is possible
for only one operator to screen thousands of microbial colonies in just
a few months. Furthermore, this method allows the detection of
antiviral activities in those colonies which rapidly lose their
productivity after their first passage in test media. These colonies
can be missed by traditional screening methods with subculture-broth
extracts.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by a grant from the CNR of Italy, PF41 no.
95.00889, to R.P.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Cattedra di
Microbiologia Applicata, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, via
Porcell 4, 09124 Cagliari, Italy. Phone: 070/6758483. Fax:
070/6758482. E-mail: Rpompei{at}unica.it.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Averett, D. R.
1989.
Anti HIV compound assessment by two novel high capacity assays.
J. Virol. Methods
23:263-276[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Baron, E. J.,
A. S. Weissfeld,
P. A. Fuselier, and D. J. Brenner.
1995.
Classification and identification of bacteria, p. 249-264. In
P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed.
ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
| 3.
|
Giromes, R.,
J. T. Jofre, and A. Bosch.
1989.
Isolation of marine bacteria with antiviral properties.
Can. J. Microbiol.
35:1015-1021[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Kamei, Y.,
M. Yoshimizu,
Y. Ezura, and T. Kimura.
1988.
Screening of bacteria with antiviral activity from fresh water salmonid hatcheries.
Microbiol. Immunol.
32:67-73[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Lampis, G.,
D. Deidda,
C. Maullu,
M. A. Madeddu,
R. Pompei,
F. Delle Monache, and G. Satta.
1995.
Sattabacins and sattazolins: new biologically active compounds with antiviral properties extracted from a Bacillus sp.
J. Antibiot.
48:967-972[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Lampis, G.,
D. Deidda,
C. Maullu,
M. A. Madeddu,
R. Pompei,
F. Delle Monache, and G. Satta.
1996.
Karalicin, a new biologically active compound from Pseudomonas fluorescens/putida. I. Production, isolation, physico-chemical properties and structure elucidation.
J. Antibiot.
49:260-262[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Lampis, G.,
D. Deidda,
C. Maullu,
M. A. Madeddu,
R. Pompei,
F. Delle Monache, and G. Satta.
1996.
Karalicin, a new biologically active compound from Pseudomonas fluorescens/putida. II. Biological properties.
J. Antibiot.
49:263-266[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Netzer, W. J.
1990.
Emerging tools for discovering drugs.
Biotechnology
8:618-622[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Omura, S.
1986.
Philosophy of new drug discovery.
Microbiol. Rev.
50:259-279[Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Prusoff, W. H.,
T. S. Limand, and M. Zucker.
1986.
Potential of targets for antiviral chemotherapy.
Antivir. Res.
6:311-328[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Schwöbel, W., and G. Streissle.
1979.
Attempts to standardize the screening for antiviral drugs by in vitro tests.
Chemotherapy
25:268-278[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Silver, L., and K. Bostiam.
1990.
Screening of natural products for antimicrobial agents.
Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
9:455-461[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Take, Y.,
T. Kubo,
E. Takemori,
Y. Inouye, and S. Nakamura.
1989.
Biological properties of streptonigrin derivatives. III. In vitro and in vivo antiviral and antitumor activities.
J. Antibiot.
42:968-976[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Talenti, A., and T. H. Smith.
1989.
Screening with a shell vial assay for antiviral activity against cytomegalovirus.
Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
12:5-8[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Whitley, R. J., and C. A. Alford.
1978.
Developmental aspects of selected antiviral chemotherapeutic agents.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
32:285-300[Medline].
|
Appl Environ Microbiol, March 1998, p. 1161-1162, Vol. 64, No. 3
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.