Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Appl Environ Microbiol, April 1998, p. 1194-1202, Vol. 64, No. 4
Mikrobiologisches Institut, ETH Zürich,
ETH-Zentrum, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Received 13 October 1997/Accepted 14 January 1998
Methylobacterium sp. strain DM4 and
Methylophilus sp. strain DM11 can grow with dichloromethane
(DCM) as the sole source of carbon and energy by virtue of homologous
glutathione-dependent DCM dehalogenases with markedly different kinetic
properties (the kcat values of the enzymes of
these strains are 0.6 and 3.3 s Dichloromethane (DCM) is an
industrial solvent used mainly in the production of synthetic
chemicals, as a paint remover, and as a degreasing agent
(23). A total of 135,000 tons of this compound was produced
in Western Europe in 1995 (15). DCM, with its very low
boiling point (40°C), escapes into the environment mainly by
evaporation into the atmosphere, and its efflux rate has been estimated
to be similar to its production rate (34). A substantial
reduction in DCM emissions has been achieved in recent years
(19), but due to its high solubility in water
(23), DCM has remained a significant component of industrial
and communal wastewater streams (28, 49). Bacteria that
mineralize DCM, such as aerobic methylotrophs (17, 27) and
anaerobic acetogens (30), can be isolated readily from soil
and groundwater that have been exposed to DCM. Methylotrophic
DCM-degrading strains express a glutathione-dependent DCM dehalogenase
that is encoded by the gene dcmA (2, 25) and is
one of the few bacterial glutathione S-transferases whose
function is known (46). The dcmA genes of several
DCM-degrading methylotrophs have been isolated and sequenced
(48), and all are closely related to the dcmA gene of Methylobacterium sp. strain DM4. The DM4 and DM11
dehalogenases display only 56% identity at the protein sequence level
(47). The kinetic parameters kcat and
Km of these enzymes differ significantly; the
DCM dehalogenase of strain DM11 exhibits a sixfold-higher turnover rate
and a sixfold-higher Km for DCM than the DCM
dehalogenase of strain DM4 (48).
Several studies have explored the potential of using DCM-utilizing
bacteria for biological treatment of industrial effluents, waste gases,
and groundwater (10, 17, 42, 49). In these studies the
efficiency of DCM removal depended not only on the technology of the
process, but also on the degradation properties of the bacterial
strains involved. Only a small amount of detailed information on the
kinetics of pure cultures growing on halogenated aliphatic compounds is
available (7, 44). The work reported here was undertaken to
investigate how the kinetic properties of DCM dehalogenase affect the
growth properties and the competitiveness of DCM-utilizing bacteria
under substrate-limiting conditions and when there is an excess of
growth substrate.
Materials.
Restriction and DNA-modifying enzymes were
purchased from Fermentas (Maechler, Basel, Switzerland) unless noted
otherwise. Oligonucleotides were purchased from Microsynth (Balgach,
Switzerland). All other chemicals were of the highest available purity
and were purchased from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland) unless noted
otherwise.
Bacterial strains and plasmids.
The bacterial strains and
plasmids used in this study are listed in Table
1. Transconjugants DM4-2cr(DM4) and
DM4-2cr(DM11) of Methylobacterium sp. strain DM4-2cr
(18) carrying plasmids pME1683 and pME1685, respectively
(see below and Table 1), were constructed by biparental mating by using
Escherichia coli S17-1 as the donor strain (41).
The identities of the transconjugants were verified by selective
plating, by PCR amplification of the dcmA gene, and by
measuring DCM dehalogenase activity in cell extracts (see below).
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Effects of Bacterial Host and Dichloromethane
Dehalogenase on the Competitiveness of Methylotrophic
Bacteria Growing with Dichloromethane
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
1, respectively, and the
Km values are 9 and 59 µM, respectively). These strains, as well as transconjugant bacteria expressing the DCM
dehalogenase gene (dcmA) from DM11 or DM4 on a
broad-host-range plasmid in the background of dcmA mutant
DM4-2cr, were investigated by growing them under growth-limiting
conditions and in the presence of an excess of DCM. The maximal growth
rates and maximal levels of dehalogenase for chemostat-adapted bacteria
were higher than the maximal growth rates and maximal levels of
dehalogenase for batch-grown bacteria. The substrate saturation
constant of strain DM4 was much lower than the
Km of its associated dehalogenase, suggesting
that this strain is adapted to scavenge low concentrations of DCM.
Strains and transconjugants expressing the DCM dehalogenase from strain
DM11, on the other hand, had higher growth rates than bacteria
expressing the homologous dehalogenase from strain DM4. Competition
experiments performed with pairs of DCM-degrading strains revealed that
a strain expressing the dehalogenase from DM4 had a selective advantage
in continuous culture under substrate-limiting conditions, while
strains expressing the DM11 dehalogenase were superior in batch culture
when there was an excess of substrate. Only DCM-degrading bacteria with
a dcmA gene similar to that from strain DM4, however, were
obtained in batch enrichment cultures prepared with activated sludge
from sewage treatment plants.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
TABLE 1.
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
DNA manipulations.
Recombinant DNA techniques were performed
as described previously (1, 36). pME1683 and pME1685, two
broad-host-range plasmids that allowed constitutive expression of the
DCM dehalogenase of either strain DM4 or strain DM11 in strain DM4-2cr
(18) with the dcmA gene of each of the strains,
were constructed under the control of the PA
promoter of the dcmA gene of strain DM4 (26). The
HindIII-BamHI fragment of plasmid pME1540
(37) containing the dcmA gene and the
PA promoter region from strain DM4 (starting 223 bases upstream from the GTG translation start codon) was subcloned into
pBluescript-KS(+), which yielded plasmid pME1681. Plasmid pME1671,
another pBluescript-KS(+) derivative containing the dcmA gene of strain DM11 behind the same promoter, was constructed as
follows. A 280-bp fragment of the upstream region of dcmA
from DM4 was amplified with universal primer T3
(5'-ATTAACCCTCACTAAAGG-3') and reverse primer
5'-CGTTATCCTCCCCTTACTGTG-3' (nucleotides 1 to
20 of the
dcmA dehalogenase region of strain DM4; EMBL accession no.
M32346) by using pME1540 (37) as the template. This amplicon was then treated with T4 DNA polymerase and cut with
HindIII. The dcmA gene from strain DM11 (EMBL
accession no. L26544) less the start codon was excised from plasmid
pME1919 (47) by digestion with NdeI, digestion
with mung bean nuclease (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany), and digestion
with BamHI. The 223-bp HindIII PCR fragment
and the 837-bp BamHI dcmA fragment from pME1919
were then ligated in one step into BamHI- and
HindIII-restricted pBluescript-KS(+) derivative pME1673,
which carries the 26-bp trpA terminator of plasmid pBAce
(9) as a HindIII-XbaI fragment in
the multiple cloning site (Table 1).
PCR and hybridization techniques.
Synthetic oligonucleotides
specific for either the DM4 dcmA gene or the DM11
dcmA gene were used for detection of these genes and for
synthesis of digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled gene probes. The specific
primers used for detection of the dcmA gene from strain DM4
were 5'-TACTTTATCATCCGGCG-3' (positions 46 to 62 in the
dcmA gene) and 5'-CTAAGCGACTGCCGCGCCCTCC-3'
(positions 866 to 845), while the dcmA gene from
strain DM11 was detected with 5'-TCGTGCAGTTCATCAATTTATGC-3' (positions 48 to 70 in the dcmA gene from DM11) and
5'-GAGTTTAACACCATCAT-3' (positions 693 to 677). DNA
amplifications were carried out in 50-µl (total volume) reaction
mixtures containing 0.2 U of Taq polymerase, 1.75 mM
MgCl2, each deoxynucleoside triphosphate at a concentration
of 200 µM, 50 pmol of each primer, and 10 to 100 ng of total
bacterial DNA or 1 µl of boiled cell suspension as the template, with
40 cycles consisting of annealing at 53°C, polymerization at 72°C,
and denaturation at 94°C. A 5-µl PCR DIG labeling mixture
(Boehringer) instead of deoxynucleoside triphosphates was used for PCR
under otherwise identical conditions to prepare base-labile DIG-labeled
gene probes. Primers 5'-GAATGACAACCGTGCGC-3' (positions
185 to
169 relative to the dcmA gene) and
5'-TCCGGTCATCGAAGGAATGC-3' (positions 155 to 136 downstream
of the dcmA gene) were used to obtain the DM4 probe, and
primers 5'-ATGAGTACTAAACTACGATAT-3' (positions 1 to 21 in
the dcmA gene) and 5'-GAGTTTAACACCATCAT-3' (positions 693 to 677 in the dcmA gene) were used for
synthesis of the DM11 probe.
Preparation of total DNA. Total DNAs from methylotrophic bacteria and DCM-degrading enrichment cultures were prepared as described previously (8). Total DNAs from sludge samples were prepared as follows. A 100-ml portion of crude sewage sludge was centrifuged, and the pellet was resuspended in 50 ml of cell disruption buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], 10 mM EDTA, 5 mM thiourea, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 1.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 1% deoxycholic acid, 1% Nonidet P-40) made with high-performance liquid chromatography quality water (Fluka). The sludge suspension was mixed with 5 g of 0.1-mm-diameter glass beads (Sigma, Buchs, Switzerland), and the cells were broken by treating the suspension for 1 min at 4°C with a bead beater (Biospec Products, Bartlesville, Okla.). The resulting slurry was extracted with phenol and chloroform, and the DNA was precipitated with ethanol and purified by treatment with polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (Sigma) as described previously (22). The DNA concentration was estimated by using agarose gels or the DNA DipStick assay (Invitrogen, Leek, The Netherlands).
Gene hybridization analysis. Slot blot hybridization was performed by applying serial dilutions containing 5 to 0.1 µg of total DNA onto a Porablot nitrocellulose membrane (Macherey-Nagel, Basel, Switzerland) with a slot blot manifold (Minifold II; Schleicher & Schuell, Basel, Switzerland). Hybridization with DIG-labeled gene probes, chemiluminescent detection, and stripping of the probes between repeated hybridizations of the same membrane were performed as recommended by the manufacturer (5).
Media and growth conditions.
E. coli strains were
grown in Luria-Bertani medium (rich medium) at 37°C. Methylotrophic
bacteria were grown at 30°C in gas-tight glass flasks in liquid
minimal medium (MM) (47). DCM (10 mM) was added as the only
source of carbon and energy after autoclaving. Solid media were
obtained by adding 15 g of agar per liter of medium before
autoclaving. Agar plates were incubated in gas-tight glass jars
(volume, 3 liters) to which 100 µl of DCM, 200 µl of methanol, or
200 µl of ethanol was added. Kanamycin (25 mg liter
1)
and ampicillin (100 mg liter
1) were used as required.
1. Only negligible stripping of DCM from the medium
was observed under these conditions.
Enrichment of DCM-degrading microorganisms from sewage sludge. Activated sludge samples were collected from two industrial sewage treatment plants (S1 and S2) in the Basel (Switzerland) region. DCM dehalogenation in sludge was determined after 4 h of incubation of a 5-g (wet weight) sludge sample in MM containing 10 mM DCM. Activated sludge samples were washed and incubated for 30 min in fresh MM containing 10 mM DCM in gas-tight vials, and the rate of chloride release was measured colorimetrically (3). Monooxygenase activity was inhibited by adding 2% acetylene to the headspace.
Microorganisms that mineralized DCM were enriched from sludge by incubating sludge samples (400 mg, wet weight) in gas-tight flasks containing 30 ml of MM supplemented with 10 mM DCM at 30°C. Degradation of DCM was monitored by measuring the formation of chloride (3) and the decrease in pH. The cultures were neutralized with 5 N NaOH and supplemented once with 10 mM DCM. Serial transfers were performed by inoculating 0.001 volume of the enrichment culture into fresh medium after all of the DCM had been consumed (4 to 6 days).Competition experiments. Sludge suspensions S1 and S2 (from sewage treatment plants S1 and S2, respectively) prepared as described above were spiked before enrichment with an amount of growing cells of strain DM11 or DM4-2cr(DM11) (Table 1) corresponding to 10% of the initial DCM-degrading activity of sludge suspension S2. The spiked samples were cultivated as described above.
In addition, pairwise competition experiments with pure cultures of Methylobacterium sp. strain DM4, DM4-2cr(DM4), or DM4-2cr(DM11) and Methylophilus sp. strain DM11 were performed by adding equal numbers of cells (~108 cells) of two organisms to 30 ml of MM containing 10 mM DCM. The cocultures were grown to the exponential phase until the optical density was 0.3, and then 30-µl aliquots were used to inoculate fresh medium. This procedure was repeated up to seven times, and samples from each serial transfer were collected for subsequent analysis of the coculture composition by PCR. Alternatively, plating on MM containing ethanol as the sole carbon source was used to determine cell counts for DM4 wild-type and DM4-2cr transconjugant colonies in the cocultures with strain DM11; this method made use of the exclusive ability of strain DM4 to grow with ethanol as a carbon source (16).Gas chromatography. Liquid samples (4.5 ml) were withdrawn from the chemostat with sterile syringes that already contained 0.5 ml of 85% phosphoric acid to quench further metabolic activity. Portions (4.5 ml) of the resulting solutions were added to 5-ml gas-tight glass vials sealed with Teflon caps containing 0.5 ml of octane (purity, >99%; Fluka). The vials were shaken vigorously to extract the DCM into the octane phase.
Aliquots (2 µl) from the octane phase were injected into a Porapak P column (1,800 by 2 mm; 80/100 mesh; Supelco, Buchs, Switzerland) on a gas chromatograph (model PE8700; Perkin-Elmer, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) equipped with an electron capture detector. Nitrogen at a flow rate of 40 ml min
1 was used as the carrier and purge gas for the
electron capture detector. The temperatures used were 160°C in the
column, 220°C in the injector, and 300°C in the detector. Under
these conditions, the retention time of DCM was 1.4 min, and the
detection limit was 0.3 µM.
Preparation and analysis of cell extracts and measurement of DCM
dehalogenase activity.
Cell extracts were obtained from
methylotrophic bacteria by repeated passage through a French press as
previously described (25). Proteins were separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on minigels (CBS Scientific
Company, Axon Lab, Baden-Dättwil, Switzerland) by using standard
protocols (1). The percentages of DCM dehalogenase protein
in the cells were calculated from the enzyme activities in the cell
extracts based on the specific activities of the purified enzymes (16.7 mkat kg
1 for the DM4 enzyme and 100 mkat
kg
1 for the DM11 enzyme). Specific DCM degradation rates
were determined by measuring formaldehyde formation from DCM turnover
as previously described (43).
Growth kinetics. Substrate saturation constants (Monod constants) (Ks) (32) were determined by a gas chromatography analysis of the residual substrate concentration S in the water phase of continuous cultures growing with different dilution rates at steady state (33). Five chemostat culture volumes was pumped through the system before measurements at a new dilution rate were obtained. From these determinations, Ks and maximal growth rates (µmax) were estimated by nonlinear least-squares fitting of the experimental data to the Monod equation (equation 1):
|
(1) |
|
(2) |
|
(3) |
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Growth rates of DCM-utilizing strains in batch culture and specific expression of the dehalogenase. We constructed plasmid derivatives that carry the dcmA gene from strain DM4 or from strain DM11 under the control of dcmA promoter PA of strain DM4 in broad-host-range plasmid pJB3Km1 (4). These plasmids were used to examine the relative importance of the properties of the bacterium and the characteristics of the DCM dehalogenase during growth with DCM. As shown in Table 2, plasmid pME1685 with the dcmA gene from Methylophilus sp. strain DM11 restored growth of DM4-2cr, a dcmA mutant of Methylobacterium sp. strain DM4 (18), when DCM was the sole carbon source. Control strain DM4-2cr(DM4) expressing the DCM dehalogenase from strain DM4 had kinetic properties similar to those of wild-type strain DM4. The maximal growth rates in batch culture with DCM as the sole carbon source were determined for Methylophilus sp. strain DM11, Methylobacterium sp. strain DM4, and two transconjugants, Methylobacterium sp. strains DM4-2cr(DM4) and DM4-2cr(DM11). The levels of expression of plasmid-encoded DCM dehalogenases in transconjugants were similar to the levels of expression in the wild-type strains, which ruled out the possibility that plasmid copy number effects were significant. In the DM4-2cr background, the dehalogenase from strain DM4 was expressed better than the dehalogenase from DM11. This may have resulted from nonoptimized codon usage of the DM11 dcmA gene in this context. The level of expression of the DM11 DCM dehalogenase, however, was comparatively low in its natural host as well (39).
|
Competition in batch culture. In all pairwise competition experiments performed in batch culture, the strain with the higher maximal growth rate with DCM outcompeted the other strain (Table 3). For reasons which are unknown at this time, the inferior strains were outcompeted significantly faster than expected based on differences in maximal growth rates (equation 2) except in the competition experiment performed with transconjugants DM4-2cr(DM11) and DM4-2cr(DM4). Transconjugant DM4-2cr(DM11), which expressed the DCM dehalogenase from DM11 in the strain DM4 background, was superior to strains containing the DCM dehalogenase from DM4. In contrast to wild-type strain DM11, however, it did not outcompete the indigenous DCM-degrading community in sewage sludge in a period corresponding to about 60 generation times (see below).
|
Enrichment and characterization of DCM-degrading microorganisms
from sewage sludge.
Samples of activated sludge from two different
sewage treatment plants (S1 and S2) were used as inocula for enrichment
of DCM-degrading microorganisms. While S1 was fed in part with communal sewage which did not contain DCM, S2 was a wastewater treatment facility that was continuously exposed to large loads of DCM from the
production of pharmaceuticals. The initial DCM-degrading capacity of
the S2 sludge after induction with DCM was 5 mmol kg of
sludge
1 h
1, but under the same conditions
the initial DCM-degrading capacity of the S1 sludge was undetectable
(<0.1 mmol kg of sludge
1 h
1). The extent
to which DCM degradation in sewage treatment plants is performed by
bacteria like DM4 or DM11 expressing glutathione-dependent dehalogenases is unknown. Since addition of acetylene did not inhibit
dehalogenation (data not shown), it is unlikely that the initial
DCM-degrading capacity of the sewage sludge samples arose from
monooxygenase-mediated cometabolic degradation of DCM (45).
|
Maximal growth rates and DCM Ks values in continuous culture. Kinetic parameters for growth of strains DM11, DM4, DM4-2cr(DM4), and DM4-2cr(DM11) on DCM were also determined in continuous cultures under substrate-limiting conditions (Table 2). The specific activities of DCM dehalogenase in cell extracts were up to threefold higher than the specific activities obtained with cells grown in batch mode. This correlated well with the increases in the amounts of the DCM dehalogenase observed in SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels (data not shown). The residual DCM concentrations were measured at different dilution rates in continuous cultures to determine the Ks of DCM-degrading strains (33). DM4 and DM4-2cr(DM4) had a very low Ks for DCM (Fig. 2), but DM4-2cr(DM4) was washed out at a dilution rate much lower than that predicted by fitting the experimental data to the Monod equation (equation 1) (Fig. 2). In contrast, the lowest dilution rate at which washout of transconjugant DM4-2cr(DM11) was observed was very similar to the maximal growth rate predicted by fitting the data to the Monod equation (Table 2).
|
Competition in continuous culture. A competition experiment was performed with transconjugants DM4-2cr(DM4) and DM4-2cr(DM11) in continuous culture at a dilution rate of 0.039 (Fig. 3). This pair of strains allowed us to study the effect of the dehalogenase on strain competitiveness in the same background under substrate-limiting conditions. A pure culture of strain DM4-2cr(DM11) was first maintained at a steady state for about 20 generations (500 h). The residual concentration of DCM at this dilution rate was 2.5 ± 0.3 µM, which is slightly below the Ks determined for this strain (Table 2). When an equal amount of cells from a batch-grown culture of DM4-2cr(DM4) was added, the DCM concentration immediately fell to a value below the detection limit (0.3 µM), as expected from the Ks of the added transconjugant in pure culture (0.6 µM) (Table 2). Screening of single colonies isolated from the chemostat with specific primers used to determine the presence of either the DM4 dcmA gene or the DM11 dcmA gene revealed that only 120 h (five generations) after introduction of strain DM4-2cr(DM4) into the chemostat, all reisolated transconjugant clones contained the dcmA gene from strain DM4. This demonstrated the importance of the affinity of the DCM dehalogenase for the competitiveness of the host strain during growth when the concentrations of growth substrate are limiting, in sharp contrast to the observations made in batch culture when there was an excess of substrate (Table 3).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Achieving low effluent concentrations of xenobiotic compounds is one of the aims of wastewater treatment and is heavily dependent on the metabolism of endogenous microorganisms that colonize the man-made treatment ecosystems (10, 12, 21). Chlorinated aliphatic chemicals are prominent problem compounds in such environments, but the factors that determine the efficiency of degradation of halogenated aliphatic compounds by microbial populations are not well understood. We therefore studied the parameters which determine the growth efficiency and competitiveness of two DCM-degrading bacteria that were previously characterized in some detail (27).
The level of expression of DCM dehalogenase increased two- to threefold when DCM-degrading organisms were cultivated in a chemostat under growth-limiting DCM supply conditions (Table 2) compared with that when they were cultivated in batch mode. Increased expression of key metabolic enzymes under substrate-limiting conditions is a well-known phenomenon (20). A high content of dehalogenase in bacteria growing in continuous culture correlated with a higher maximal growth rate compared to batch conditions, except for strain DM11, which had about the same maximal growth rate under batch conditions as under continuous culture conditions (Table 2). This suggested that strain DM11 had been under selection pressure to maximize its growth rate.
The experiments to determine maximal growth rates in continuous
cultures by measuring washout rates at dilution rates higher than the
maximal growth rates (13) were fraught with technical difficulties. Biomass washout was often impossible to observe, since at
high growth rates the bacteria tended to form a thick biofilm on the
walls of the fermentor glass vessel, a phenomenon previously observed
by other workers (11). For strain DM4-2cr(DM4), in contrast,
dilution rates higher than 0.123 h
1 resulted in washout
of the culture, although fitting of the experimental data to the Monod
equation suggested that the maximal growth rate was 0.15 h
1. The fact that the maximum growth rate is approached
very slowly with increasing substrate concentrations is a possible
weakness of the Monod kinetic model (35), and many
alternative models have been developed to describe the kinetics of
bacterial growth (see reference 24 for a review).
For example, the specific affinity model (6, 13) often used
to describe the relative ability of a bacterium to sequester growth
substrates, in which specific affinity is defined as the ratio of
maximal growth rate to Ks for the
growth-limiting substrate, assumes that the lower end of the growth
rate-versus-substrate concentration curve is linear. In the case
studied here, however, all of the strains had very similar maximal
growth rates, and the substrate affinity of the bacteria was most
simply described by the Ks parameter alone. This
also allowed us to directly compare the substrate affinity of the
bacteria with the affinity constant (Km) of the
key metabolic enzyme, DCM dehalogenase.
DCM-degrading bacteria were able to grow at substrate concentrations much lower than the Km of the expressed dehalogenase (Table 2), although this was true to a lesser degree in the case of strain DM11. Such a discrepancy between the observed Ks for the growth substrate of a bacterial strain and the Km of the key metabolic enzyme has been described well previously (13, 44) and has been explained by levels of expression of the key metabolic enzyme much greater than the levels of expression required for bacterial growth with the enzyme substrate. For example, in the Ancylobacter aquaticus mutant strain AD25 growing with 1,2-dichloroethane, haloalkane dehalogenase accounted for 30 to 40% of the total cell protein, a 10- to 15-fold-higher value than the value for the parent strain growing with a similar maximal growth rate (44). This overcapacity led to high conversion rates at substrate concentrations much lower than the Km of the dehalogenase, resulting in a low Ks for the strain. Also, Pseudomonas putida pWW0 was shown to have a 4- to 5-fold higher level of expression of enzymes of the TOL upper pathway, resulting in a 10-fold overcapacity for the oxidation of m-xylene, compared to the observed rate of m-xylene transformation in a chemostat (13).
In the present study, the observed growth rates for chemostat-grown DCM-degrading bacteria under substrate-limiting conditions differed significantly from the growth rates predicted on the basis of the kinetics and level of expression of the dehalogenase (equation 3) (Fig. 4). On the one hand, the predicted growth rates of the two strains expressing the DM11 type of dehalogenase exceeded the experimental growth rates. This effect was observed at DCM concentrations greater than 30 µM for DM4-2cr(DM11) (Fig. 4C) and over the entire range of substrate concentrations for strain DM11 (Fig. 4D). Thus, factors other than the turnover number of the dehalogenase limited the growth of strains DM4-2cr(DM11) and DM11 with DCM at near-maximal growth rates. The predicted and experimental growth curves for strain DM11 (Fig. 4D) agreed well at low DCM concentrations, suggesting that the Ks of this organism was determined mainly by the kinetics and level of expression of the dehalogenase.
|
On the other hand, the observed growth rates of strains DM4 and DM4-2cr(DM4) were higher than predicted (Fig. 4A and B), and the Ks values of DM4 and DM4-2cr transconjugants were far lower than those expected from the kinetic parameters and the observed expression of the DCM dehalogenases alone. In other words, the activities and substrate affinities of the dehalogenases measured in vitro were not high enough to account for the growth rates of strain DM4 and DM4-2cr transconjugants (Fig. 4A through C) at low dilution rates. The existence of a DCM accumulation system in Methylobacterium sp. strain DM4 would provide the dehalogenase with a higher substrate concentration than that present in the medium. In the case of common hydrophilic growth substrates, such as glucose, succinate, and acetate, transmembrane uptake systems which are often upregulated under substrate-limiting conditions (40) result in accumulation of the growth substrate in the bacterial cell (20) and contribute to an increase in substrate affinity (7, 40). The possibility that there is an accumulation mechanism involving enrichment of DCM in membrane compartments by passive diffusion (like the mechanisms observed for other lipophilic halogenated compounds) that would expose membrane-bound metabolic enzymes to increased substrate concentrations (12) can be eliminated in this case since the DCM dehalogenase of Methylobacterium sp. strain DM4 is located in the cytosol (27). Finally, although the possibility that in strain DM4 there is an effector that enhances DCM activity in vivo cannot be eliminated a priori, it is rather unlikely in our view since such an effector would have to result in increases in the kcat values of both DM4 and DM11 enzymes by factors of about 10 and 5, respectively, to yield a better fit with the observed Ks values in vivo (Fig. 4).
The properties of strains DM4 and DM11 and of the corresponding DCM dehalogenases may reflect differences in the natural environments of these bacteria. DM11 was enriched from a spill site that had been very heavily contaminated with DCM for decades (38), and this strain may have evolved under conditions that included a high concentration of DCM. DM4, on the other hand, was isolated from wastewater sludge. Sewage treatment plants have some typical characteristics of a continuous system, such as constant influx of nutrients, efflux of purified water, and continuous removal of biomass, in addition to low concentrations of DCM. In this environment, steady-state concentrations of growth-limiting substrates are as low as the metabolic activities of the endogenous microorganisms in the sludge permit, and Ks, rather than maximal growth rate, is the relevant parameter for bacterial competitiveness. Indeed, only DCM degraders with genes resembling the DM4 dcmA gene could be detected in or enriched from sewage sludge (Fig. 1), despite the fact that the batch method of cultivation used for enrichment strongly favored growth of organisms with properties similar to those of strain DM11.
Since strain DM4 is already highly optimized with respect to Ks, the efficiency of the dehalogenase appears to be the limiting step for growth with DCM in this bacterium. Therefore, cultivation of DM4-2cr(DM11) in a chemostat containing low DCM concentrations should favor the selection of faster-growing mutants in which the comparatively high Km of the wild-type DM11 DCM dehalogenase has been altered. Such mutants, if they can be obtained, may shed some light on the structural features of DCM dehalogenases which determine substrate affinity and catalytic efficiency (31, 47, 48).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to Svein Valla for his gift of plasmid pJB3Km1 and for providing details of its properties prior to publication, to Ming Tam for supplying plasmid pGST3, to Dietmar Stax for advice on the preparation of total DNA from sludge, and to Wouter Duetz for helpful suggestions on the manuscript.
This research was supported by grant 5002-037905 from the Biotechnology Priority Programme of the Swiss National Research Foundation.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Mikrobiologisches Institut, ETH Zürich, ETH-Zentrum/LFV, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland. Phone: 41 1 632 33 57. Fax: 41 1 632 11 48. E-mail: svuilleu{at}micro.biol.ethz.ch.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl. 1997. . Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y. |
| 2. |
Bader, R., and T. Leisinger.
1994.
Isolation and characterization of the Methylophilus sp. strain DM11 gene encoding dichloromethane dehalogenase/glutathione S-transferase.
J. Bacteriol.
176:3466-3473 |
| 3. | Bergmann, J. G., and J. Sanik. 1957. Determination of trace amounts of chlorine in naphtha. J. Anal. Chem. 29:241-243. |
| 4. | Blatny, J. M., T. Brautaset, H. C. Winther-Larsen, K. Haugan, and S. Valla. 1997. Construction and use of a versatile set of broad-host-range cloning and expression vectors based on the RK2 replicon. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:370-379[Abstract]. |
| 5. | Boehringer. 1995. . The DIG system user's guide for filter hybridization. Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany. |
| 6. | Button, D. K. 1983. Differences between the kinetics of nutrient uptake by microorganisms, growth and enzyme kinetics. Trends Biochem. Sci. 4:121-124. |
| 7. |
Button, D. K.
1985.
Kinetics of nutrient-limited transport and microbial growth.
Microbiol. Rev.
49:270-297 |
| 8. |
Chen, W., and T. Kuo.
1993.
A simple and rapid method for the preparation of Gram-negative bacterial genomic DNA.
Nucleic Acids Res.
21:2260 |
| 9. |
Craig, S. P.,
L. Yuan,
D. A. Kuntz,
J. H. McKerrow, and C. C. Wang.
1991.
High level expression in Escherichia coli of soluble, enzymatically active schistosomal hypoxanthine/guanine phosphoribosyltransferase and trypanosomal ornithine decarboxylase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:2500-2504 |
| 10. | Diks, R. M., and S. P. Ottengraf. 1991. Verification studies of a simplified model for the removal of dichloromethane from waste gases using a biological trickling filter (part I). Bioprocess Eng. 6:93-99. |
| 11. | Diks, R. M. M. 1992. . The removal of dichloromethane from waste gases in a biological trickling filter. Ph.D. thesis. Technical University, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. |
| 12. | Duetz, W. A. 1996. . Physiology of toluene-degrading Pseudomonas strains under various conditions of nutrient limitation in chemostat culture. Ph.D. thesis. Rijksuniversiteit, Groningen, The Netherlands. |
| 13. | Duetz, W. A., B. Wind, M. Kamp, and J. G. van Andel. 1997. Effect of growth rate, nutrient limitation and succinate on expression of TOL pathway enzymes in response to m-xylene in chemostat cultures of Pseudomonas putida (pWW0). Microbiology 143:2331-2338. |
| 14. | Duetz, W. A., M. K. Winson, J. G. van Andel, and P. A. Williams. 1991. Mathematical analysis of catabolic function loss in a population of Pseudomonas putida mt-2 during non-limited growth on benzoate. J. Gen. Microbiol. 137:1363-1368[Medline]. |
| 15. | European Chlorinated Solvents Association. 1995. . Plain facts about chlorinated solvents. European Chlorinated Solvents Association, Brussels, Belgium. |
| 16. | Gälli, R. 1986. . Optimierung des mikrobiellen Abbaus von Dichlormethan in einem Wirbelschicht-Bioreaktor. Ph.D. thesis. ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. |
| 17. | Gälli, R., and T. Leisinger. 1985. Specialized bacterial strains for the removal of dichloromethane from industrial waste. Conserv. Recycling 8:91-100. |
| 18. | Gälli, R., and T. Leisinger. 1988. Plasmid analysis and cloning of the dichloromethane-utilization genes of Methylobacterium sp. DM4. J. Gen. Microbiol. 134:943-952[Medline]. |
| 19. | Hanson, D. J. 1996. Toxics release inventory report shows chemical emissions continuing to fall. Chem. Eng. News 74:29-46. |
| 20. | Harder, W., and L. Dijkhuizen. 1983. Physiological responses to nutrient limitation. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 37:1-23[Medline]. |
| 21. | Hartmans, S., and J. Tramper. 1991. Dichloromethane removal from waste gases with a trickle-bed bioreactor. Bioprocess Eng. 6:83-92. |
| 22. |
Holben, W. E.,
J. K. Jansson,
B. K. Chelm, and J. M. Tiedje.
1988.
DNA probe method for the detection of specific microorganisms in the soil bacterial community.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
54:703-711 |
| 23. | Howard, P. H. 1990. , p. 176-183. Handbook of environmental fate and exposure data for organic chemicals, vol. 2. Lewis Publishers Inc., Chelsea, Mich. |
| 24. | Jannasch, H. W., and T. Egli. 1993. Microbial growth kinetics: a historical perspective. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 63:213-224[Medline]. |
| 25. |
La Roche, S. D., and T. Leisinger.
1990.
Sequence analysis and expression of the bacterial dichloromethane dehalogenase structural gene, a member of the glutathione S-transferase supergene family.
J. Bacteriol.
172:164-171 |
| 26. |
La Roche, S. D., and T. Leisinger.
1991.
Identification of dcmR, the regulatory gene governing expression of dichloromethane dehalogenase in Methylobacterium sp. strain DM4.
J. Bacteriol.
173:6714-6721 |
| 27. | Leisinger, T., R. Bader, R. Hermann, M. Schmid-Appert, and S. Vuilleumier. 1994. Microbes, enzymes and genes involved in dichloromethane utilization. Biodegradation 5:237-248[Medline]. |
| 28. | Line, D. E., J. Wu, J. A. Arnold, G. D. Jennings, and A. R. Rubin. 1997. Water quality of first flush runoff from 20 industrial sites. Water Environ. Res. 69:305-310. |
| 29. | Liu, L. F., J. L. Hong, S. P. Tsai, J. C. Hsieh, and M. F. Tam. 1993. Reversible modification of rat liver glutathione S-transferase 3-3 with 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene-specific labelling of Tyr-115. Biochem. J. 296:189-197. |
| 30. | Mägli, A., M. Wendt, and T. Leisinger. 1996. Isolation and characterization of Dehalobacterium formicoaceticum gen. nov. sp. nov., a strictly anaerobic bacterium utilizing dichloromethane as source of carbon and energy. Arch. Microbiol. 166:101-108. |
| 31. | Marsh, A., and D. M. Ferguson. 1997. Knowledge based modeling of a bacterial dichloromethane dehalogenase. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 28:217-226. [Medline] |
| 32. | Monod, J. 1949. The growth of bacterial cultures. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 3:371-394. |
| 33. | Owens, J. D., and J. D. Legan. 1987. Determination of the Monod substrate saturation constant for microbial growth. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 46:419-432. |
| 34. | Pearson, C. R. 1982. C1 and C2 halocarbons, p. 69-88. In O. Hutzinger (ed.), The handbook of environmental chemistry, vol. 3. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. |
| 35. | Powell, E. O., C. G. T. Evans, R. E. Strange, and D. W. Tempest. 1967. . Microbial physiology and continuous culture. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, United Kingdom. |
| 36. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. . Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 37. | Schmid-Appert, M., K. Zoller, H. Traber, S. Vuilleumier, and T. Leisinger. 1997. Association of newly discovered IS elements with the dichloromethane utilization genes of methylotrophic bacteria. Microbiology 143:2557-2567[Abstract]. |
| 38. | Scholtz, R. 1989. . Hydrolytische und reduktive Dehalogenierung von aliphatischen Chlorkohlenwasserstoffen durch Mikroorganismen. Ph. D. thesis. ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. |
| 39. |
Scholtz, R.,
L. P. Wackett,
C. Egli,
A. M. Cook, and T. Leisinger.
1988.
Dichloromethane dehalogenase with improved catalytic activity isolated from a fast-growing dichloromethane-utilizing bacterium.
J. Bacteriol.
170:5698-5704 |
| 40. | Senn, H., U. Lendenmann, M. Snozzi, G. Hamer, and T. Egli. 1994. The growth of Escherichia coli in glucose-limited chemostat cultures: a re-examination of the kinetics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1201:424-436[Medline]. |
| 41. | Simon, R., U. Priefer, and A. Pühler. 1983. A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram negative bacteria. Bio/Technology 1:784-790. |
| 42. | Stucki, G. 1990. Biological decomposition of dichloromethane from a chemical process effluent. Biodegradation 1:221-228[Medline]. |
| 43. | Stucki, G., R. Gälli, H. R. Ebersold, and T. Leisinger. 1981. Dehalogenation of dichloromethane by cell extracts of Hyphomicrobium DM2. Arch. Microbiol. 130:366-371. |
| 44. |
van den Wijngaard, A. J.,
R. D. Wind, and D. B. Janssen.
1993.
Kinetics of bacterial growth on chlorinated aliphatic compounds.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
59:2041-2048 |
| 45. | van Hylckama Vlieg, J. E. T., W. de Koning, and D. B. Janssen. 1996. Transformation kinetics of chlorinated ethenes by Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b and detection of unstable epoxides by on-line gas chromatography. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:3304-3312[Abstract]. |
| 46. |
Vuilleumier, S.
1997.
Bacterial glutathione S-transferases: what are they good for?
J. Bacteriol.
179:1431-1441 |
| 47. | Vuilleumier, S., and T. Leisinger. 1996. Protein engineering studies of dichloromethane dehalogenase/glutathione S-transferase from Methylophilus sp. strain DM11. Ser12 but not Tyr6 is required for enzyme activity. Eur. J. Biochem. 239:410-417[Medline]. |
| 48. | Vuilleumier, S., H. Sorribas, and T. Leisinger. 1997. Identification of a novel determinant of glutathione affinity in dichloromethane dehalogenase/glutathione S-transferases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 238:252-256[Medline]. |
| 49. | Zuber, L. 1995. . Trickling filter and three-phase airlift bioreactor for the removal of dichloromethane from air. Ph.D. thesis. ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Eukaryot. Cell | All ASM Journals |
|---|