Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Appl Environ Microbiol, May 1998, p. 1644-1649, Vol. 64, No. 5
Centre de Bioingénierie Gilbert Durand,
UMR CNRS 5504, LA INRA, INSA, Complexe Scientifique de Rangueil,
31077 Toulouse cedex, France
Received 6 November 1997/Accepted 20 February 1998
Dextransucrase (DSR-S) from Leuconostoc mesenteroides
NRRL B-512F is a glucosyltransferase that catalyzes synthesis of
soluble dextran from sucrose. In the presence of efficient acceptor
molecules, such as maltose, the reaction pathway is shifted toward
glucooligosaccharide synthesis. Like glucosyltransferases from oral
streptococci, DSR-S possesses a C-terminal glucan-binding domain
composed of a series of tandem repeats. In order to determine the role
of the C-terminal region of DSR-S in dextran or oligosaccharide
synthesis, four DSR-S genes with deletions at the 3' end were
constructed. The results showed that the C-terminal region modulated
the initial velocity of dextran synthesis but that the
Km for sucrose, the optimum pH, and the
activation energy were all unaffected by the deletions. The C-terminal
domain modulated the rate of oligosaccharide synthesis whatever
acceptor molecule was used (a good acceptor molecule such as maltose or
a poor acceptor molecule such as fructose). The C-terminal domain
seemed to play no role in the catalytic process in dextran and
oligosaccharide synthesis. In fact, it seems that the role of the
C-terminal domain of DSR-S may be to facilitate the translation of
dextran and oligosaccharides from the catalytic site.
Dextransucrase (DSR-S) from
Leuconostoc mesenteroides NRRL B-512F is a
1,527-amino-acid glucosyltransferase (EC 2.4.1.5) that catalyzes
the synthesis from sucrose of a soluble dextran in which more than 95%
of the D-glucosyl units are Analysis of the DSR-S sequence revealed that in its N-terminal
portion the region extending from amino acid 268 to amino acid 1134 is
homologous to the corresponding region of glucosyltransferases (GTFs)
from oral streptococci (21). In GTFs, this region is essential for maintaining glucan synthesis activity (1, 8) and includes a putative catalytic site for sucrose hydrolysis (12,
22). Essential amino acids have been identified in DSR-S (21), and structural predictions have suggested that like
In GTFs the glucan-binding region is located in the carboxy-terminal
portion, which contains about 300 to 400 amino acids in these enzymes
(8, 35). The glucan-binding region does not participate in
sucrose splitting (1, 12, 35) but strongly modulates
activity (1, 8, 11, 18). It contains a series of homologous
repeating units consisting of about 30 amino acids, which are also
found in Streptococcus mutans glucan-binding protein (3). A number of types of repeats have been identified on
the basis of sequence similarities, and these repeats have been
designated A, B, C, and D repeats (8, 9, 33). All of these
repeats contain the same structural element, the YG repeat, which is
characterized by the presence of clusters of aromatic residues, the
predominance of polar and turn-promoting residues at certain positions,
and the occurrence of a glycine residue three or four residues
downstream from the aromatic cluster (9). The numbers and
patterns of repeats vary in different streptococcal enzymes, but no
correlation between these repeats and enzyme function has been found.
However, four A repeats are required for functioning of S. mutans GTF-S, which synthesizes soluble glucan composed of
D-glucosyl units that are predominantly In the present paper we describe a sequence analysis of the C-terminal
portion of L. mesenteroides NRRL B-512F DSR-S and the effect
of sequential deletions on the biochemical properties of DSR-S. We paid
particular attention to characterizing the dextran and oligosaccharide
synthesis activities of mutants in order to better understand the role
of the C-terminal region of DSR-S in the catalytic mechanism.
Molecular techniques.
Escherichia coli transformations
were carried out by the method of Hanahan (10). Restriction
or modifying enzymes were used as described by the enzyme supplier (New
England Biolabs, Inc.). DNA purification, digestion, and agarose gel
electrophoresis were performed by standard procedures (20).
Construction of plasmids.
Genomic DNA from L. mesenteroides NRRL B-512F was extracted as described by Phalip
et al. (25) and was used as a template to clone the
full-length 4,580-bp dsr-S gene in plasmid pTrc99A in order
to produce plasmid pBF7 (21) by using sequence information obtained by Wilke-Douglas et al. (34) and deposited under
GenBank accession no. I09598. Briefly, a set of primers (a 5' end
primer, 5'-ATAGAAGAGAGCTCATTATAAGGAGAAAATTTATG,
containing a SacI-engineered restriction site, and a
3' end primer, 5'-TATATATCTAGAAAGCTTATGCTGACACAG, containing an XbaI-engineered restriction
site) was designed to PCR amplify a 4.8-kb fragment containing the
entire dsr-S gene. Plasmid pBF7 was obtained by ligating the
PCR product and pTrc99A (2) that had been double digested
with XbaI and SacI. The SacI cleavage
site was positioned in the primer sequence so that the ATG of the
vector could be used as the start codon.
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Effect of Leuconostoc mesenteroides NRRL B-512F
Dextransucrase Carboxy-Terminal Deletions on Dextran and
Oligosaccharide Synthesis
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
(1-6) linked (21,
34). This dextran has many important industrial and medical uses
(4). In the presence of efficient acceptor molecules, such
as maltose, the reaction pathway is shifted toward oligosaccharide synthesis (16, 21).
-amylases, the catalytic domains of GTFs and DSR-S are members of
the (
/
)8 barrel-containing protein family
(19).
(1-6) linked
(18). In contrast, only two A repeats are necessary for
S. mutans GTF-I, which synthesizes insoluble mutan, a
polysaccharide composed of D-glucosyl units that are
(1-3) linked (1, 8, 11). The C terminus may also
influence the structure of the glucan produced, but this has not been
well studied (23, 32). Moreover, the involvement of the
glucan-binding domain in the catalytic mechanism is still not clearly
defined, nor is the role of the glucan-binding domain in
oligosaccharide synthesis understood.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
(A) Schematic representation of the structure of the
C-terminal domain of DSR-S. The cleavage sites on the dsrS
sequence are shown, as are the ends of truncated enzymes on the DSR-S
sequence. Corresponding protein sizes are also indicated. aa, amino
acids. (B) Sequences of A repeats, C repeats, and N repeats. The
consensus sequences (7, 8) used to identify the A and C
repeats are shown. Boldface type indicates conserved amino acid
residues.
Preparation of wild-type and mutant DSR-S. E. coli DH1 containing the dsr-S gene and E. coli DH1 containing the deleted dsr-S genes were grown as described previously (21) in 400 ml of Luria-Bertani medium supplemented with 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.4) and 0.1 mg of ampicillin per ml at 30°C. Lactose was added to final concentration of 20 g/liter; this compound was used as an inducer of the trc promoter. Cells were harvested after 13 h of growth by centrifugation, resuspended in 20 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.4) containing 1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and sonicated. Debris and unbroken cells were pelleted, and the supernatant was used as the source of enzymes. Protein concentrations were determined by the method of Bradford (6) with bovine serum albumin as the standard.
Enzyme activity assays. In order to determine dextran synthesis activity, reactions were performed at 30°C in 20 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.4) containing 0.05 g of CaCl2 per liter and 100 g of sucrose per liter. Activity was assayed by the dinitrosalicylic acid method (30). One unit was defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzed the formation of 1 µmol of fructose per min under these conditions. Activity was also determined by measuring the quantity of soluble dextran by high-performance liquid chromatography with gel permeation (type SI-100 column; Merck) by using a Hewlett-Packard series 1050 system consisting of a pump, an injector, and a model HP 1047A refractometer. The eluant was ultrapure water at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min.
The effect of pH on activity was measured in the presence of 100 g of sucrose per liter at 30°C by using 20 mM sodium acetate buffer at pH values ranging from 4.3 to 6.6. Oligosaccharide synthesis reactions were performed at 26°C to reduce enzyme thermal denaturation. Oligosaccharide synthesis in the presence of maltose acceptor was carried out in 20 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.4) containing 0.05 g of CaCl2 per liter, 50 g of sucrose per liter, and 25 or 10 g of maltose per liter, giving ratios of sucrose concentration to maltose concentration of 2 or 5. In the presence of a fructose acceptor, sucrose was used at a concentration of 50 g/liter and fructose was used at a concentration of 50 g/liter, which gave a ratio of sucrose concentration to fructose concentration of 1. Oligosaccharides were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography with a type C18 column by using a Hewlett-Packard series 1050 system and ultrapure water as eluant at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min.Electrophoresis analysis. Equivalent quantities of total proteins from cell extracts prepared from E. coli transformants expressing either full-length dsr-S genes or dsr-S genes having deletions or transformants simply carrying pTrc99A were denatured for 2 min at 95°C, separated by 7% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (17), and stained with Coomassie blue R-350 (Pharmacia).
Detection of reaction product in gel. After SDS-PAGE, the gel was washed three times with 20 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.4) containing 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 at 4°C to eliminate the SDS. The gel was incubated in the same buffer at 4°C, 100 g of sucrose per liter was added, and the active bands were detected by the formation of dextran as a white polymer inside the gel.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Construction of dsr-S genes having deletions and expression in E. coli. Analysis of the C-terminal domain of DSR-S revealed that this region contains several types of repeats (Fig. 1). Repeats homologous to the A and C repeats identified previously in S. mutans glucan-binding protein (3) were identified at amino acids 1193 to 1396 (Fig. 1). The carboxy end of this domain was composed of a repeat homologous to the C repeat and a series of small repeats containing the characteristic elements of the YG repeats, such as a glycine residue three or four residues downstream from the aromatic cluster (9) (Fig. 1). However, these repeats are not highly conserved (Fig. 1). The fact that a C-terminal domain ends with repeating units that are not very well conserved has not been encountered previously in other glucan-binding proteins or GTFs. We have named these repeats N repeats.
In order to determine the function of these repeating units during enzyme activity, four DSR-S deletion derivatives were constructed as described in Materials and Methods. DSR-S1 contained the first three A repeats, the first two C repeats, and only one N repeat, while DSR-S2 contained the first three A repeats and the first two C repeats. DSR-S3 contained the first two A repeats and the first two C repeats, while DSR-S4 contained the first A repeat and the first two C repeats (Fig. 1). All truncated genes were cloned into pTrc99A (2). Sonicated extracts of each deletion derivative obtained from cultures of transformed E. coli DH1 were used as sources of enzymes. SDS-PAGE staining of these extracts revealed that dsr-S and the deletions were expressed at similar levels (Fig. 2A). The typical DSR-S pattern was observed with DSR-S, and different active forms were produced, which corresponded to bands at 200, 180, and 160 kDa (21). The molecular masses of the three bands decreased with a decrease in DNA length. For DSR-S and the four deletion derivatives, these protein bands exhibited DSR-S activity that was detectable on SDS-PAGE gels (Fig. 2B).
|
Characterization of DSR-S and truncated DSR-S activities. Activity assays carried out with DSR-S and the truncated enzymes indicated that removal of the C-terminal end from DSR-S resulted in a strong decrease in activity, as determined by the release of fructose (Fig. 3). The effects of deletions on dextran synthesis activity seemed to be the same; similar decreases in fructose-releasing and dextran synthesis activities were observed with DSR-S, DSR-S1, and DSR-3 (Fig. 3). The lack of the last six repeats, corresponding to a loss of only 85 amino acids, resulted in the largest decrease in activity. When DSR-S2 was compared to DSR-S4, the loss of activity was less drastic. In order to further characterize the effects of the deletions and because DSR-S2, DSR-S3, and DSR-S4 exhibited similar activities, only DSR-S1 and DSR-S3 were used in a comparison of properties with the properties of the full-length enzyme, DSR-S.
|
Effects of deletions on Km and Vmax values. In order to determine whether the deletions that altered activity also affected the binding of sucrose, the Km value for sucrose of full-length DSR-S was compared with the Km values of two truncated enzymes, DSR-S1 and DSR-S3. These values were determined from Lineweaver-Burk plots by determining initial velocities in the presence of 100 to 2.5 g of sucrose per liter. The Km values were very similar (26, 28, and 32 mM for DSR-S, DSR-S1, and DSR-S3, respectively). However the Vmax value was significantly affected by the deletions; the Vmax values for DSR-S, DSR-S1, and DSR-S3 were 75, 21.1, and 1.9 U/ml, respectively.
Effect of temperature on DSR-S activity. As shown in Fig. 4, DSR-S and DSR-S1 exhibited the same optimum temperature (30°C), whereas DSR-S3 had an optimum temperature of 26°C. DSR-S3, in which 170 amino acid residues in the C-terminal portion of DSR-S were deleted, was much more sensitive to temperature denaturation than DSR-S or DSR-S1. The three preparations had the same profile for activation by temperature (Fig. 4). The activation energies were determined by using Arrhenius plots and were of the same order of magnitude (39.0, 40.0, and 39.2 kJ/mol for DSR-S, DSR-S1, and DSR-S3, respectively).
|
Effect of pH on activity of truncated enzymes. The effect of pH on activity of truncated enzymes was determined with DSR-S, DSR-S1, and DRS-S3. Exogenous soluble T70 dextran was also added at a concentration of 5 g/liter to determine if the effect on activity observed with dextransucrase from L. mesenteroides NRRL B-512F (13) was modified by deletions (Fig. 5). In the absence of exogenous dextran, the pH range for maximal activity was the same, pH 5.1 to 5.6, for the three enzymes. At low pH values, DSR-S3 was also much more sensitive to pH inhibition than DSR-S or DSR-S1 was (Fig. 5C).
|
Oligosaccharide synthesis in the presence of maltose. As previously observed with the dextran synthesis reaction, all of the deletions affected acceptor reaction kinetics (Table 1). Addition of maltose increased the initial velocity of the reaction with DSR-S. Deletions did not suppress this effect. With DSR-S1 this positive effect of maltose on activity seemed to be the same as the effect observed with DSR-S. With DSR-S3, maltose had a stronger activator effect (Table 1). With DSR-S, the yield of oligosaccharide synthesis decreased when the ratio of sucrose concentration to maltose concentration increased (Table 2). The increase in the ratio of sucrose concentration to maltose concentration also affected the yield of oligosaccharides produced by truncated enzymes. The yield was the same with all enzymes.
|
|
|
Effects of deletions on leucrose synthesis in the presence of
fructose.
With dextranscurase produced by L. mesenteroides NRRL B-512F, fructose is a weak acceptor which
slows down the overall reaction rate, and the leucrose produced
[5-O-(
-D-glucopyranosyl)-D-fructopyranose] is not an acceptor (5, 14). With DSR-S, the initial velocity of the reaction in the presence of fructose was lower than the initial
velocity of the reaction in the absence of fructose, (Table 1), and the
leucrose yield in the presence of fructose was 21% (Table 2). With
DSR-S1 and DSR-S3, the yields were greater, showing that deletions
favored leucrose synthesis at the expense of dextran synthesis.
Moreover, the inhibitory effect on the reaction rate was less with
DSR-S1 than with DSR-S. Surprisingly, with DSR-S3, fructose, like
maltose, had an activating effect (Table 1).
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Like all GTFs whose sequences are known (9, 33), the C-terminal domain of DSR-S from L. mesenteroides NRRL B-512F is composed of a series of repeats homologous to A and C repeats. The terminal portion contains repeat motifs which are not highly conserved but possess the main characteristics of the YG repeats (9) that we call N repeats. This structure has not been identified in streptoccocal GTFs. In order to gain further insight into the role of C-terminal repeats in GTF activity, the effects of engineered deletions on both dextran and oligosaccharide synthesis were examined.
As with streptococcal GTFs (1, 8, 11, 18, 32), the C-terminal portion of DSR-S is crucial for maintaining a high initial rate of consumption of sucrose and a high initial rate of synthesis of dextran. There is a direct correlation between dextran synthesis and sucrose consumption, which indicates that deletions have no effect on the ratio of sucrose hydrolysis to polymer synthesis. This suggests that the C-terminal domain of DSR-S does not facilitate the transfer of glucosyl residues on the dextran chain.
The binding sites for sucrose and dextran are separate sites on DSR-S (15), and the catalytic site responsible for cleavage of sucrose is located in its N-terminal region (19, 21, 22). The fact that deletions do not have a drastic effect on the Km for sucrose suggests that they do not alter the ability of DSR-S to bind the substrate sucrose. Moreover, the activation energy of the dextran synthesis reaction is not affected by deletions, which shows that the energy level of the transition state is not modified. The optimum pH does not change. The distribution of local charges in the catalytic site of DSR-S and the distribution of these charges in the truncated enzymes are the same, which indicates that the sucrose binding site is not directly affected by deletions.
The reaction velocity is the only parameter which is strongly influenced by deletions; deletions in the C terminus of DSR-S result in decreases in the initial reaction rate. Although the truncated proteins seem to be more sensitive to thermal denaturation than DSR-S is, this difference cannot explain the decreases in the initial rate observed with the truncated enzymes. The presence of the three first repeats is sufficient to maintain a detectable dextran synthesis activity, but the last 85 amino acid residues are particularly crucial for activity. However, without additional evidence it is not possible to say whether the size of the C-terminal portion of DSR-S alone is crucial for maintaining activity or whether there is a direct correlation between the absence of a nontypical N series of repeats in the C-terminal domain and the decrease in activity.
In the case of the dextran synthesis reaction, it has been proposed that translation of the growing dextran is the limiting step in the reaction, perhaps because of steric hindrance (7). Like the initial velocity of the reaction, the glucan-binding properties of the C-terminal domain are also altered by deletions; the activator effect of dextran T70 does not occur with DSR-S3. Thus, because of its glucan-binding properties, the C-terminal domain of DSR-S could have a positive effect on the reaction velocity by making translation of the growing dextran from the catalytic site easier.
The effect of deletions on oligosaccharide synthesis has not been examined previously, but such a study could provide interesting information because mechanisms of synthesis are different; transfer of glucosyl residues occurs at the nonreducing ends of oligosaccharides, while synthesis of polymers occurs at the reducing ends (27, 28). Maltose and fructose were used as examples of good and bad acceptors, respectively. In both cases, the velocity of oligosaccharide synthesis was also dramatically affected by deletions. As in the dextran synthesis reaction, the C-terminal portion of DSR-S is crucial for maintaining a high initial rate of oligosaccharide production.
The activation of DSR-S by maltose described previously (24, 26) is even more pronounced with truncated enzymes. Paul et al. interpreted this effect as the result of a change in a limiting step of the reaction (24). In the presence of maltose, the formation of a D-glucosyl-enzyme complex before sugar is transferred to the acceptor should be the limiting step (24). This effect is observed with deleted proteins, which supports the idea that the kinetics of D-glucosyl-enzyme complex formation in the presence of maltose is not modified by deletions. The overall yields of oligosaccharides are equivalent in the presence of maltose. As previously described for dextransucrase produced by L. mesenteroides NRRL B-512F (29), only the ratio of sucrose concentration to maltose concentration had an effect on these yields. According to the proposed mechanisms for the acceptor reaction with maltose (28, 31), this supports the hypothesis that the C-terminal portion is not involved in the process which results in oligosaccharide formation.
However, the distributions of the products are not similar. A 170-amino-acid deletion in the C-terminal domain of DSR-S results in an increase in the percentage of the longest oligosaccharides produced (OD6). When the C-terminal domain is truncated, the oligosaccharides may stay longer in the microenvironment of the catalytic site, which allows the oligosaccharide chain to elongate. Thus, it seems that the role of the C-terminal domain of DSR-S in oligosaccharide synthesis is to facilitate removal of the oligosaccharides from the catalytic site. In this case, the C-terminal glucan-binding domain of DSR-S also appears to be an oligosaccharide-binding domain.
As previously described (5, 14), the presence of the poor acceptor fructose decreases the reaction rate of DSR-S. Deletions tend to suppress this inhibitory effect, and fructose is a strong acceptor with DSR-S3; both the reaction rate and the yield increase in its presence. Böker et al. (5) have proposed that the leucrose synthesis reaction is slower than the dextran synthesis reaction but inhibits dextran chain elongation. With DSR-S3, the leucrose synthesis reaction may be faster than the dextran synthesis reaction. Thus, the reaction velocity would not be limited by dextran elongation but would be limited by the step that occurs in the acceptor reaction in the presence of a strong acceptor, such as maltose.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported by the European Union as part of the project "Structure-function relationships of glucosyltransferases," by BIOTECH contract BIO2CT 943071, and by Région Midi-Pyrénées.
We thank R. R. Russell for critically reading the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Centre de Bioingénierie Gilbert Durand, INSA, Complexe Scientifique de Rangueil, 31077 Toulouse cedex, France. Phone: 33-5-61-55-94-46. Fax: 33-5-61-55-94-00. E-mail: willemot{at}insa-tlse.fr.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Abo, H.,
T. Matsumura,
T. Kodama,
H. Ohta,
K. Fukui,
K. Kato, and H. Kagawa.
1991.
Peptide sequences for sucrose splitting and glucan binding within Streptococcus sobrinus glucosyltransferase (water-insoluble glucan synthetase).
J. Bacteriol.
173:989-996 |
| 2. | Amman, E., B. Ochs, and K. J. Abel. 1988. Tightly regulated tac promoter vectors useful for the expression of unfused and fused proteins in Escherichia coli. Gene 69:301-315[Medline]. |
| 3. |
Banas, J. A.,
R. R. B. Russell, and J. J. Ferretti.
1990.
Sequence analysis of the gene for the glucan-binding protein of Streptococcus mutans Ingbritt.
Infect. Immun.
58:667-673 |
| 4. | Barker, P. E., G. Ganetsos, and N. J. Ajongwen. 1993. A novel approach to the production of clinical-grade dextran. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 57:21-26[Medline]. |
| 5. | Böker, M., H.-J. Jördening, and K. Buchholz. 1994. Kinetics of leucrose formation from sucrose by dextransucrase. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 43:856-864. |
| 6. | Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248-254[Medline]. |
| 7. | Ebert, K. H., and G. Schenk. 1968. Mechanism of biopolymer growth: the formation of dextran and levan. Adv. Enzymol. 30:179-221. |
| 8. |
Ferretti, J. J.,
M. L. Gilpin, and R. R. B. Russell.
1987.
Nucleotide sequence of a glucosyltransferase gene from Streptococcus sobrinus Mfe28.
J. Bacteriol.
169:4271-4278 |
| 9. |
Giffard, P. M., and N. A. Jacques.
1994.
Definition of a fundamental repeating unit in streptococcal glucosyltransferase glucan-binding regions and related sequences.
J. Dent. Res.
73:1133-1141 |
| 10. | Hanahan, D. 1983. Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J. Mol. Biol. 166:557-580[Medline]. |
| 11. | Kato, C., and H. K. Kuramitsu. 1990. Carboxy-terminal deletion analysis of the Streptococcus mutans glucosyltransferase-I enzyme. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 72:299-302. |
| 12. | Kato, C., Y. Nakano, M. Lis, and H. K. Kuramitsu. 1992. Molecular genetic analysis of the catalytic site of Streptococcus mutans glucosyltransferases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 189:1184-1188[Medline]. |
| 13. | Kobayashi, M., I. Yokoyama, and K. Matsuda. 1984. Activation of dextransucrase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides by the substrate, dextran. Agric. Biol. Chem. 48:221-223. |
| 14. | Kobayashi, M., I. Yokoyama, and K. Matsuda. 1985. Effectors differently modulating the dextransucrase activity of Leuconostoc mesenteroides evaluated by inhibition kinetics. Agric. Biol. Chem. 49:3189-3195. |
| 15. | Kobayashi, M., I. Yokoyama, and K. Matsuda. 1986. Substrate binding sites of Leuconostoc dextransucrase evaluated by inhibition kinetics. Agric. Biol. Chem. 50:2585-2590. |
| 16. | Koepsell, H. J., H. M. Tsuchiya, N. N. Hellman, A. Kasenko, C. A. Hoffmann, E. S. Shape, and R. W. Jackson. 1952. Enzymatic synthesis of dextran. Acceptor specificity and chain initiation. J. Biol. Chem. 200:793-801. |
| 17. | Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature (London) 227:680-685[Medline]. |
| 18. | Lis, M., T. Shiroza, and H. K. Kuramitsu. 1995. Role of the C-terminal direct repeating units of the Streptococcus mutans glucosyltransferase-S in glucan binding. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:2040-2042[Abstract]. |
| 19. |
MacGregor, A. E.,
H. M. Jespersen, and B. Svensson.
1996.
A circularly permuted -amylase type / barrel structure in glucan-synthesizing glucosyltransferases.
FEBS Lett.
378:263-266[Medline].
|
| 20. | Maniatis, T., E. F. Fritsch, and J. Sambrook. 1982. In Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 21. | Monchois, V., M. Remaud-Simeon, R. R. B. Russell, P. Monsan, and R. M. Willemot. 1997. Characterization of Leuconostoc mesenteroides NRRL B-512F dextransucrase (DSR-S) and identification of amino-acid residues playing a key role in enzyme activity. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 48:465-472[Medline]. |
| 22. |
Mooser, G.,
S. A. Hefta,
R. J. Paxton,
J. E. Shively, and T. D. Lee.
1991.
Isolation and sequence of an active-site peptide containing a catalytic aspartic acid from two Streptococcus sobrinus glucosyltransferases.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:8916-8922 |
| 23. |
Nakano, Y. J., and H. K. Kuramitsu.
1992.
Mechanism of Streptococcus mutans glucosyltransferases: hybrid-enzyme analysis.
J. Bacteriol.
174:5639-5646 |
| 24. | Paul, F., E. Oriol, D. Auriol, and P. Monsan. 1986. Acceptor reaction of a highly purified dextransucrase with maltose and oligosaccharides. Application to the synthesis of controlled-molecular-weight dextrans. Carbohydr. Res. 149:433-441. |
| 25. | Phalip, V., V. Dartois, P. Schmitt, and C. Divies. 1994. Cloning of the D-lactate deshydrogenase gene from Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. cremoris. Biotechnol. Lett. 16:221-226. |
| 26. | Reh, K.-D., H. J. Jördening, and K. Buchholz. 1994. Kinetics of oligosaccharide synthesis by dextransucrase. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 613:723-729. |
| 27. | Robyt, J. F., B. K. Kimble, and T. F. Walseth. 1974. The mechanism of dextransucrase action. Direction of dextran biosynthesis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 165:634-640[Medline]. |
| 28. | Robyt, J. F., and T. F. Walseth. 1978. The mechanism of acceptor reaction of Leuconostoc mesenteroides NRRL B-512F dextransucrase. Carbohydr. Res. 61:433-445[Medline]. |
| 29. | Robyt, J. F., and S. H. Eklund. 1983. Relatives quantitative effects of acceptors in the reaction of Leuconostoc mesenteroides B 512-F dextransucrase action. Carbohydr. Res. 121:279-286[Medline]. |
| 30. |
Sumner, J. B., and S. F. Howell.
1935.
A method for determination of invertase activity.
J. Biol. Chem.
108:51-54 |
| 31. | Tarivseven, A., and J. F. Robyt. 1992. Inhibition of dextran synthesis by acceptor reactions of dextransucrase and the demonstration of a separate acceptor binding site. Carbohydr. Res. 225:321-329. |
| 32. | Vickerman, M. M., M. C. Sulavik, P. E. Minick, and D. B. Clewell. 1996. Changes in the carboxy-terminal repeat region affect extracellular activity and glucan products of Streptococcus gordonii glucosyltransferase. Infect. Immun. 64:5117-5128[Abstract]. |
| 33. |
Von Eichel-Streiber, C.,
M. Sauerborn, and H. K. Kuramitsu.
1992.
Evidence for a modular structure of the homologous repetitive C-terminal carbohydrate-binding sites of Clostridium difficile toxins and Streptococcus mutans glucosyltransferases.
J. Bacteriol.
174:6707-6710 |
| 34. | Wilke-Douglas, M., J. T. Perchorowicz, C. M. Houck, and B. R. Thomas. December 1989. Methods and compositions for altering physical characteristics of fruit and fruit products. WO 89/12386. |
| 35. |
Wong, C.,
A. H. Stanley,
R. J. Paxton,
J. E. Shively, and G. Mooser.
1990.
Size and subdomain architecture of the glucan-binding domain of sucrose: 3- -D-glucosyltransferase from Streptococcus sobrinus.
Infect. Immun.
58:2165-2170 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»