Previous Article | Next Article 
Appl Environ Microbiol, May 1998, p. 1983-1985, Vol. 64, No. 5
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
A PCR Detection Method for Rapid Identification of
Melissococcus pluton in Honeybee Larvae
V. A.
Govan,1
V.
Brözel,1
M. H.
Allsopp,2 and
S.
Davison1,*
Department of Microbiology, University of the
Western Cape, Bellville 7535,1 and
Plant
Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Council,
Stellenbosch 7599,2 South Africa
Received 14 November 1997/Accepted 10 March 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Melissococcus pluton is the causative agent of European
foulbrood, a disease of honeybee larvae. This bacterium is particularly difficult to isolate because of its stringent growth requirements and
competition from other bacteria. PCR was used selectively to amplify
specific rRNA gene sequences of M. pluton from pure culture, from crude cell lysates, and directly from infected bee larvae. The PCR primers were designed from M. pluton 16S
rRNA sequence data. The PCR products were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis and confirmed as originating from M. pluton
by sequencing in both directions. Detection was highly specific, and
the probes did not hybridize with DNA from other bacterial species
tested. This method enabled the rapid and specific detection and
identification of M. pluton from pure cultures and infected bee larvae.
 |
TEXT |
European foulbrood (EFB) is a
disease of honeybee larvae which kills them when they are 4 or 5 days
old, mostly in the early summer when bee colonies are rapidly growing.
There is often a well-defined seasonal outbreak followed immediately by
a spontaneous recovery. When the larvae die, they often turn brown,
decompose, and give off a foul odor which is associated with the
disease. Several bacteria may be associated with cases of EFB, and most have at one time or another been considered as the primary pathogen (5). At various times the disease has been attributed to
Streptococcus apis (12), Bacillus
alvei (10), and Bacterium eurydice
(8). Today it is accepted that EFB is caused by
Melissococcus pluton (5), which is a
gram-positive bacterium formerly known as Bacillus pluton
(17, 18). The other bacteria previously thought to cause EFB
are in fact commonly associated secondary bacteria which rapidly
accelerate the death of the infected larvae.
The disease is widespread and has been of economic importance in North
and South America, Europe, Japan, Australia, India, and southern Africa
(13). The diagnosis of EFB is initially based on typical
disease symptoms in the honeybee colony. If the disease is widespread,
the comb takes on a pepperbox appearance, with many uncapped and
diseased cells mixed with normal capped cells. Another symptom is that
caps sealing healthy brood are convex while those of diseased brood are
concave and sometimes punctured (16). Infected larvae first
turn yellow and then brown and die twisted against the side of the cell
or melted at the bottom of the cell. The remains of the larva dry out
and form a scalelike protrusion in the cell. Worker, drone, and queen
larvae are all susceptible to EFB.
Despite the widespread economic importance of EFB, the routine
cultivation and identification of M. pluton remain
problematic, as evidenced by the organism's being poorly described in
Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology
(10a). In addition, EFB is not routinely screened by
honeybee disease laboratories worldwide, despite a number of
publications comparing techniques for analysis of EFB (1,
11). Instead, these laboratories tend to use the presence of the
secondary bacterial invaders Achromabacter eurydice, Bacillus laterosporus, and B. alvei as
presumptive evidence of the presence of M. pluton (11,
16). Although selective medium for the cultivation of M. pluton exists (2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11), involving anaerobic
incubation on yeast extract medium supplemented with sugar, starch,
cysteine, and potassium, the cultural requirements are fastidious and
M. pluton is extremely difficult to isolate. Competition
from other bacteria is a problem, and even if isolated, M. pluton is difficult to identify due to its pleomorphic nature
(16).
EFB has most commonly been diagnosed by the microscopic identification
of M. pluton early in the infection cycle, before the appearance of secondary microflora associated with the disease. Negative staining with nigrosin assists in the identification of
bacteria resembling M. pluton (1, 2). The
bacterium is a non-spore-forming, lanceolate coccus, occurring singly,
in pairs, and in chains and measuring 0.5 to 0.7 by 1.0 µm (1,
16). M. pluton may also be distinguished by scanning
electron microscopy (1), by enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assays (Pinnock and Featherstone [14]), and with
polyclonal antisera by using type strains (2).
No method for the identification of the causative organism of EFB has,
however, become established in routine screening. In order to quickly
and accurately identify the presence of M. pluton, PCR
primers were designed from the 16S rRNA gene of M. pluton. The 16S rRNA genes are essential for the survival of all organisms and
are highly conserved in all kingdoms; therefore, it is an ideal
molecular marker to use for identification (20). However, to
isolate the 16S rRNA gene by PCR and sequence it, in order to identify
the organism from which it came, would be too time-consuming and
expensive to perform on a routine basis. The PCR primers used here were
designed from a region of the M. pluton 16S rRNA gene that
was not homologous to other bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences deposited
in the available databases. The primers were designed to amplify a PCR
amplicon which was 831 bp and would be unique to M. pluton.
The PCR primers were tested against four bacteria, including the
M. pluton type strain (LMG 9003). Escherichia
coli, B. alvei, and Staphylococcus aureus
were grown in Luria broth, and M. pluton was grown in basal
medium (4). Genomic DNAs were prepared according to standard
methods (19). The DNA pellets were resuspended in 50 µl of
1× TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 1 mM EDTA). Approximately 1 to 3 µg of genomic DNA was amplified in a 50-µl reaction mixture in a
Hybaid OMN-E thermocycler. The PCR was optimized with the following
concentrations: 2 mM MgCl2, 50 pmol of primers (primer 1, 5' GAAGAGGAGTTAAAAGGCGC 3'; primer 2, 5'
TTATCTCTAAGGCGTTCAAAGG 3') per µl, 25 mM (each)
deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate, and 1 U of Taq polymerase
per µl. The PCR conditions consisted of a cycle of 95°C (1 min); 30 cycles of 93°C (1 min), 55°C (30 s), and 72°C (1 min); and a
final cycle of 72°C (5 min). The molecular weights of the PCR
products were determined by electrophoresis in a 0.8% agarose gel and
staining with ethidium bromide. Under these PCR conditions only the
M. pluton type strain produced a PCR product. As expected,
this product banded alongside the 812-bp lambda Pst marker
(Fig. 1).

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Agarose gel (0.8%) showing PCR products from genomic
DNA from different lysed bacterial species (pure cultures). Lanes: m,
Pst-cut lambda DNA marker (the 812-bp band is indicated); 1, E. coli; 2, B. alvei; 3, S. aureus;
and 4, M. pluton.
|
|
The PCR primers were then used directly with honeybee larvae. Two bee
larvae that showed symptoms of EFB disease and two apparently healthy
worker larvae from Stellenbosch, South Africa, were tested. Each larva
was incubated individually in the basal medium overnight, anaerobically, at 30°C in an anaerobic jar containing hydrogen plus
10% (vol/vol) CO2. Two milliliters of each sample was then centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 2 min, and the
supernatant was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min.
The resultant pellets were resuspended in 100 µl of sterile
H2O and heated at 95°C for 15 min. One microliter was
amplified in a 50-µl PCR mixture. When the resulting PCR products were run on agarose gels only the diseased larvae produced bands of
approximately 812 bp, whereas the healthy larvae did not (Fig. 2).

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Agarose gel (0.8%) showing PCR products from healthy
and diseased bee larvae and an M. pluton pure culture.
Lanes: m, Pst-cut lambda DNA marker (the 812-bp band is
indicated); 1, M. pluton type strain; 2, nondiseased bee
larvae; 3, diseased bee larvae; 4, nondiseased bee larvae; and 5, diseased bee larvae.
|
|
To confirm that the bee larva PCR product was from M. pluton, the PCR product was cloned into pCR-Script Amp SK(+)
cloning vector and transformed with the pCR-Script Amp SK(+) cloning
kit (Stratagene). Plasmids were purified with the nucleobond kit
(Maherey-Nagel) for plasmid isolation. The PCR product was sequenced in
both directions by standard methods (15). A sequence
similarity search was done by using the BLAST server at the National
Center for Biotechnology Information. The PCR product was found to be
831 bp long, which was the same size as the region on the M. pluton 16S rRNA gene between the two primers. An alignment of the
PCR product and the M. pluton 16S rRNA gene sequence showed
the two sequences to have base pair mismatches at positions 593 and 824 of the 16S rRNA gene (Fig. 3).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Alignment of bases 84 to 913 of the 16S rRNA gene of
M. pluton (NCBI accession no. X75752) with the PCR product
obtained from enriched bee lysate. The primer-binding regions are
indicated in boldface type, and the two mismatches at positions 593 and
824 are boxed.
|
|
The high degree of homology between the PCR product and the M. pluton 16S rDNA gene (99.7% [data not shown]) clearly indicates that the PCR product was from M. pluton. Previous studies
have shown the 16S rDNA gene of M. pluton to exhibit the
highest levels of sequence similarity with members of the
Enterococcus genus (range, approximately 94 to 96%)
(9). The PCR product used in this study was found to have
its closest sequence similarity to the Enterococcus faecium
16S rRNA gene (96.3% [data not shown]). More significantly, the PCR
primers used here, compared to E. faecium, had six and five
mismatches over the 20-mer regions of primer 1 and primer 2, respectively. Since Enterococcus is the genus most closely
related to Melissococcus, it is not possible that these
bacteria were detected with these PCR primers.
The technique described here is a quick and accurate method for the
identification of M. pluton directly from diseased bee larvae. The time required to complete the procedure, following overnight incubation of the bee larvae, is only 6 h, thus making the method an ideal diagnostic technique. This is a particularly useful
technique because of the internationally recognized difficulty in
isolating and identifying M. pluton.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was partly funded by the Foundation for Research
Development.
We are grateful for sequencing carried out by Di James from the
Department of Microbiology at the University of Cape Town.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17,
Bellville 7535, South Africa. Phone: 27-21-9592216. Fax: 27-21-9592216. E-mail: Sean{at}mbiol.uwc.ac.za.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alippi, A. M.
1991.
A comparison of laboratory techniques for the detection of significant bacteria of the honey bee, Apis mellifera, in Argentina.
J. Apic. Res.
30:75-80.
|
| 2.
|
Allen, M. F., and B. V. Ball.
1993.
The cultural characteristics and serological relationships of isolates of Melissococcus pluton.
J. Apic. Res.
32:80-88.
|
| 3.
|
Anderson, D. L.
1990.
Pests and pathogens of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) in Fiji.
J. Apic. Res.
29:53-59.
|
| 4.
|
Bailey, L.
1959.
An improved method for the isolation of Streptococcus pluton and observations on its distribution and ecology.
J. Insect Pathol.
1:80-85.
|
| 5.
|
Bailey, L.
1983.
Melissococcus pluton, the cause of European foulbrood of honey bees (Apis spp.).
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
55:65-69.
|
| 6.
|
Bailey, L.
1985.
Melissococcus pluton and European foulbrood.
Bee World
66:134-136.
|
| 7.
|
Bailey, L., and M. D. Collins.
1982.
Reclassification of Streptococcus pluton (White) in a new genus Melissococcus pluton.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
53:215-217.
|
| 8.
|
Burri, R.
1941.
Neue Untersuchungen über den Erreger der Sauerbrut der Bienen.
Beih. Schweiz. Bienen-Zeitung
1:1-28.
|
| 9.
|
Cai, J., and M. D. Collins.
1994.
Evidence for a close phylogenetic relationship between Melissococcus pluton, the causative agent of European foulbrood disease, and the genus Enterococcus.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
44:365-367[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Cheshire, F. R., and W. W. Cheyne.
1905.
The pathogenic history and history under cultivation of a new bacillus (B. alvei), the cause of a disease of the hive bee hitherto known as foulbrood.
J. R. Microsc. Soc. Ser. 2
5:581-601.
|
| 10a.
|
Hardie, J. M.
1986.
Genus Streptococcus, p. 1043-1071.
In
P. H. A. Sneath, N. S. Mair, M. E. Sharpe, and J. G. Holt (ed.), Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, vol. 2. The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, Md.
|
| 11.
|
Hornitsky, M. A. Z., and S. C. Wilson.
1989.
A system for the diagnosis of the major bacterial brood diseases of honeybees.
J. Apic. Res.
28:191-195.
|
| 12.
|
Maasen, A.
1908.
Zur Aetiologie der Sogennanten Faulbrut der Honigbiene.
Arb. Biol. Reichsanstalt Land Fortwirt. Berlin-Dahlem
6:53-70.
|
| 13.
|
Matheson, A.
1993.
World bee health report.
Bee World
74:176-212.
|
| 14.
|
Pinnock, D. E., and N. E. Featherstone.
1984.
Detection and quantification of Melissococcus pluton infection in honey bee colonies by means of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
J. Apic. Res.
23:168-170.
|
| 15.
|
Sanger, F.,
S. Nicklen, and A. R. Coulson.
1977.
DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
74:5463-5467[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Shimanuki, H.,
D. A. Knox,
B. Furgala,
D. M. Caron, and J. L. Williams.
1992.
Diseases and pests of honey bees, p. 1083-1151.
In
J. Graham (ed.), The hive and the honey bee. Dadant and Sons, Hamilton, Ill.
|
| 17.
|
White, G. F.
1912.
In
The cause of European foulbrood. U.S. Department of Agriculture Bureau of Entomology circular no. 157. U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
|
| 18.
|
White, G. F.
1920.
In
European foulbrood. U.S. Department of Agriculture bulletin no. 810. U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
|
| 19.
|
Wilson, K.
1990.
Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria, p. 2-4-1.
In
F. M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. A. Smith, J. G. Seidman, and K. Struhl (ed.), Current protocols in molecular biology. Greene Publishing and Wiley Interscience, New York, N.Y.
|
| 20.
|
Woese, C. R.
1987.
Bacterial evolution.
Microbiol. Rev.
51:221-271[Free Full Text].
|
Appl Environ Microbiol, May 1998, p. 1983-1985, Vol. 64, No. 5
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.