Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 1998, p. 2982-2987, Vol. 64, No. 8
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Influence of Lactobacillus spp. from an
Inoculant and of Weissella and Leuconostoc spp.
from Forage Crops on Silage Fermentation
Yimin
Cai,1,*
Yoshimi
Benno,1
Masuhiro
Ogawa,2
Sadahiro
Ohmomo,3
Sumio
Kumai,4 and
Takashi
Nakase1
Japan Collection of Microorganisms, The
Institute of Physical and Chemical Research, Wako, Saitama
351-0198,1
Kyusyu National Agricultural
Experiment Station, Nishigoshi, Kumamoto
861-1192,2
National Institute of Animal
Industry, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0901,3 and
College of Agriculture, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime
790-8566,4 Japan
Received 17 February 1998/Accepted 26 May 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Lactobacillus spp. from an inoculant and
Weissella and Leuconostoc spp. from forage
crops were characterized, and their influence on silage fermentation
was studied. Forty-two lactic acid-producing cocci were obtained
from forage crops and grasses. All isolates were gram-positive,
catalase-negative cocci that produced gas from glucose, and produced
more than 90% of their lactate in the D-isomer form. These
isolates were divided into groups A and B by sugar fermentation
patterns. Two representative strains from the two groups, FG 5 and FG
13, were assigned to the species Weissella paramesenteroides and Leuconostoc
pseudomesenteroides, respectively, on the basis of DNA-DNA
relatedness. Strains FG 5, FG 13, and SL 1 (Lactobacillus
casei), isolated from a commercial inoculant, were used as
additives to alfalfa and Italian ryegrass silage preparations. Lactic
acid bacterium counts were higher in all additive-treated silages than
in the control silage at an early stage of ensiling. During silage
fermentation, inoculation with SL 1 more effectively inhibited the
growth of aerobic bacteria and clostridia than inoculation with strain
FG 5 or FG 13. SL 1-treated silages stored well. However, the control
and FG 5- and FG 13-treated silages had a significantly
(P < 0.05) higher pH and butyric acid and ammonia
nitrogen contents and significantly (P < 0.05) lower
lactate content than SL 1-treated silage. Compared with the control
silage, SL 1 treatments reduced the proportion of
D-(
)-lactic acid, gas production, and dry matter loss in
two kinds of silage, but the FG 5 and FG 13 treatments gave similar values in alfalfa silages and higher values (P < 0.05) in Italian ryegrass silage. The results confirmed that
heterofermentative strains of W. paramesenteroides FG 5 and
L. pseudomesenteroides FG 13 did not improve silage quality
and may cause some fermentation loss.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Silage is now the most common
preserved cattle feed in many countries, including Japan. It is
well established that lactic acid bacteria (LAB) play an important
role in silage fermentation. Epiphytic microflora, the microorganisms
naturally present on forage crops, are responsible for silage
fermentation and also influence silage quality (3, 11, 15).
Lactobacilli and lactic acid-producing cocci, e.g., leuconostocs,
lactococci, streptococci, pediococci, and Weissella species,
are major components of the microbial flora in various types of forage
crops (3). Stirling and Whittenbury (21) reported
that leuconostocs were the most numerous and widely distributed on
forages and that lactobacilli occurred mostly on grasses. Cai et al.
(3) examined a large number of forage crops and grasses and
also found that the predominant LAB were lactic acid-producing cocci
and that lactobacilli were the least numerous and mostly
homofermentative. Ruser (17) found that although all LAB
groups were present in chopped-maize samples, homofermentative
lactobacilli and heterofermentative leuconostocs were present in the
highest numbers.
In order to improve silage quality, many LAB-containing biological
additives have been developed and are currently available (13, 20,
25). These inoculants may inhibit the growth of harmful bacteria
and enhance lactic acid fermentation during ensiling periods. The
epiphytic LAB influence the effectiveness of silage inoculants because
the introduced bacteria must compete with these LAB (12).
Therefore, the LAB species and their characteristics in the silage
environment require further study. However, while an increasing number
of studies have reported positive benefits from using some bacterial
inoculants as silage additives, relatively few have reported the effect
of epiphytic LAB, especially Leuconostoc and
Weissella species, on silage fermentation. In the present study, the characterization of Leuconostoc and
Weissella species isolated from forage crops and their
influence on silage fermentation were examined.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Materials.
Corn (Zea mays) at the dough-ripe
stage, sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at the milk-dough stage,
alfalfa (Medicago sativa) at the flowering stage, Italian
ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) at the heading stage, and
Guinea grass (Panicum maximum) at the flowering stage were
obtained from an experimental field at the National Grassland Research
Institute (Tochigi, Japan) from July 1993 to December 1995. For the
counts of viable microorganisms in the material, see Table 2.
Strains.
A total of fifty-four strains (shown in Table
1) were isolated from forage crops and
grasses, using GYP agar (10) and Lactobacilli MRS medium
(Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) containing 1.5% agar incubated at
30°C for 2 days under anaerobic conditions. Each colony was purified
twice by streaking on MRS agar. The pure cultures were grown on MRS
agar at 30°C for 24 h, resuspended in a solution of nutrient
broth (Difco Laboratories) and dimethyl sulfoxide at a ratio of 9:1,
and stored as stock cultures at
80°C for further examination. As
shown in Table 1, the Leuconostoc and Weissella
type strains were obtained from the Japan Collection of Microorganisms
(JCM), The Physical and Chemical Research Institute, Wako, Saitama,
Japan.
Microbiological analysis.
The numbers of microorganisms were
measured by the plate count method (26). Forage crops and
grass samples (10 g) were shaken well with 90 ml of sterilized
distilled water, and 10
1 and 10
8 serial
dilutions were made in 0.85% sodium chloride solution. LAB were
counted on a plate agar containing bromocresol purple (Nissui-seiyaku
Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and GYP-CaCO3 agar (10) after incubation in an anaerobic box (TE-HER Hard Anaerobox, ANX-1; Hirosawa Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at 30°C for 2 or 3 days. LAB were detected by a yellowish colony and a clear zone due to dissolving CaCO3. Their physiological properties were then determined
by the methods of Kozaki et al. (10). Clostridia were
counted on EG agar (Eiken-kagaku Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and BL agar
(Nissui-seiyaku Ltd.) after incubation in an anaerobic box at 30°C
for 3 to 5 days. They were detected by the methods of Ueno
(24). Aerobic bacteria were counted on nutrient agar
(Nissui-seiyaku Ltd.), and mold and yeasts were counted on potato
dextrose agar (Nissui-seiyaku Ltd.). The agar plates were incubated at
30°C for 2 to 4 days. Colonies were counted as viable numbers of
microorganisms (in CFU per gram of fresh matter [FM]).
Morphological, physiological, and biochemical tests.
Morphological characteristics and Gram staining of LAB were examined
after 24 h of incubation on MRS agar. Catalase activity, nitrite
reduction, and gas production from glucose were determined by the
methods of Kozaki et al. (10). Growth at different
temperatures was observed in MRS broth after incubation at 10 and
15°C for 14 days and at 45 and 50°C for 7 days. To test for sugar
fermentation, the strains were cultivated on liver broth (LB) at 30°C
for 24 h, and the broth was then diluted 10-fold with sterile
saline solution. Sugar fermentation patterns were examined by using a semiautomatic system for bacterial identification (1).
Twenty-four sugars were tested in LB basal medium containing 0.5%
(wt/vol) sugar. The LB basal medium was composed of 1,000 ml of 0.55%
Bacto Liver (Difco) solution, 10 g of Proteose Peptone 3 (Difco),
5 g of Trypticase (BBL), 3 g of yeast extract (Difco), 1 g of Tween 80, 5 ml of salts solution, and 0.2 g of
L-cysteine HCl · H2O; the pH was adjusted
to 7.2. The salts solution contained 10 g of
MgSO4 · 7H2O, 0.5 g of
FeSO4 · 7H2O, 0.5 g of NaCl, 0.3 g of MnSO4, and 250 ml of distilled water. The isomers of
lactate formed from glucose were determined enzymatically by using
reagents obtained from Boehringer GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.
DNA base composition and DNA-DNA hybridization.
DNA was
extracted from cells harvested from MRS broth incubated for 8 h at
30°C and purified by the procedure of Saito and Miura
(18). DNA base composition was determined by the method of
Tamaoka and Komagata (22) by high-performance liquid
chromatography following the enzymatic digestion of DNA to
deoxyribonucleosides. The equimolar mixture of four
deoxyribonucleotides in a Yamasa GC Kit (Yamasa Shoyu Co., Ltd.,
Choshi, Japan) was used as the quantitative standard. DNA-DNA
relatedness was determined by the method of Ezaki et al. (8)
by using photobiotin and microplates.
Laboratory silage preparation and chemical analysis.
Alfalfa
and Italian ryegrass were harvested at the flowering stage in August
1996. Silage was prepared by using a small-scale system of silage
fermentation (23). The strains FG 5, FG 13, and SL 1 isolated from a commercial inoculant, Snow Lact-L (Lactobacillus casei; Brand Seed Ltd., Sapporo, Japan), were used. MRS broth was
inoculated with strains FG 5, FG 13, and SL 1 and incubated overnight.
After incubation, the optical density at 700 nm of the suspension was
adjusted with sterile 0.85% NaCl solution to 0.42. The inoculum size
of LAB was 1 ml of suspension per kg of fresh matter (FM).
Approximately 100-g portions of forage material, chopped into about
20-mm lengths, were packed into plastic film bags (Hiryu KN type, 180 by 260 cm; Asahikasei), and the bags were sealed with a vacuum sealer
(BH 950; Matsushita). The silage treatments were designed as follows:
(i) untreated control, (ii) FG 5, (iii) FG 13, and (iv) SL 1. The film
bag silos were kept at 25°C, and three replicates per treatment were
used for microbiological and chemical analysis.
The chemical composition of the forage crops and silages was determined
by conventional methods (14). The dry matter (DM) content of
the fresh forage was determined by oven drying at 70°C for 48 h,
whereas that of the silages was determined by the removal of water,
using toluene distillation with ethanol correction (5). The
WSC and organic acid contents were measured by high-performance liquid
chromatography (16). The ammonia nitrogen and lactic acid
isomer contents were determined by enzymatic analysis, specifically, the F-Kit UV method (Boehringer GmbH). Gas production and DM loss were
determined by the methods of Cai et al. (4).
Statistical analysis.
Data on chemical composition of silage
ensiled for 30 days were analyzed by analysis of variance, and the
significance of differences among means was tested by the
multiple-range test (6).
 |
RESULTS |
Counts of microorganisms.
The counts of viable microorganisms
in fresh forage crops are shown in Table
2. Overall, there were 105 to
106 aerobic bacteria, 102 to 105
mold and yeast, 103 to 105 enterococci and
leuconostocs,
103 lactobacilli, pediococci, and
clostridia in each of the five forage crops (counts in CFU
gram
1).
Physiological and biochemical properties.
Characteristics of
Leuconostoc and Weissella species are shown in
Table 3. All isolates were gram-positive,
catalase-negative cocci that produced gas from glucose, produced more
than 90% of their lactate in the D-isomer form, and did
not grow below pH 4.5. These strains were divided into two groups
on the basis of sugar fermentation patterns. Group A included 17 strains that did not produce acid from esculin, cellobiose, lactose,
and D-raffinose, while group B included 25 strains that did
produce acid from these sugars. The ability of group B to ferment
carbohydrates was similar to that of Leuconostoc
pseudomesenteroides JCM 9696T, but group A isolates
were easily distinguished from the type strains of all
Leuconostoc and Weissella species.
Characteristics of strains FG 5, FG 13, and SL 1 are shown in Table
4. Strain FG 5 from group A gave negative
reactions for ammonia from arginine and dextran formation, whereas FG
13 from group B gave positive reactions. FG 5 and FG 13 did not grow
below pH 4.5, but SL 1 could grow at pH 3.5. In addition, SL 1 was a homofermentative lactobacillus that formed lactic acid in the
L-isomer form.
DNA base composition and DNA-DNA hybridization.
DNA base
composition and DNA-DNA hybridization data are shown in Table
5. Representative strains FG 5 and FG 13 from groups A and B had G+C contents in the range of 39.2 to 39.5 mol%. The data are within the range of 35 to 40 mol% G+C from the
Leuconostoc and Weissella genera. Strains FG 5 and FG 13 showed high levels of DNA relatedness (84.5% and 85.8 to
88.4%) to the reference strain of Weissella
paramesenteroides JCM 9890T and L. pseudomesenteroides JCM 9696T, respectively, whereas
homology values were low (8.8 to 36.8%) compared to other reference
strains of the previously described species.
Changes in microbiological composition during silage
fermentation.
The changes in microbiological composition during
silage fermentation are shown in Table 6.
During silage fermentation of alfalfa and Italian ryegrass, the numbers
of lactobacilli, leuconostocs, and weissellae in the treated
silages were higher in the first few days of ensiling than those in the
control silage. However, by day 10, the numbers of lactobacilli in FG
5- and FG 13-treated silages were lower than that in SL 1-treated
silage. By day 30, the leuconostocs and weissellae had decreased
to a low level (103 CFU g
1) or were too few
to count in all the silages. The number of aerobic bacteria decreased
from day 2 after ensiling in all silages, and the most rapid decline in
the aerobic bacteria was observed in the SL 1-treated silages. The
number of clostridia decreased to a lower level (<102 CFU
g
1) in SL-treated silages during the first 10 days of
incubation. However, in the FG 5- and FG 13-treated silages, the
clostridia had increased to a high level (107 CFU
g
1) in the same time period.
Silage quality and dry matter loss.
The silage quality and DM
loss are shown in Table 7. In the alfalfa
and Italian ryegrass silages, the SL 1 treatments gave the same values,
the pH value and butyric acid and ammonia nitrogen contents were
significantly (P < 0.05) lower, and the lactic acid contents were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than
those of the control silage. However, in the FG 5- and FG 13-treated
silages, these values were similar to those of the control. Compared
with the control silage, SL 1 treatments reduced the proportion of D-isomer to total lactic acid, DM loss, and gas production
significantly (P < 0.05) in two kinds of silage, but
the FG 5 and FG 13 treatments resulted in similar values in alfalfa
silages and increased them significantly (P < 0.05) in
Italian ryegrass silages.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Generally, leuconostocs are found living in association with plant
material and dairy products and several studies have reported leuconostocs as the dominant microbial population on forage crops and
silage (3, 21). Some isolates from silage forages have been
identified as Leuconostoc mesenteroides. In this study, the strains in group B were phenotypically similar to L. pseudomesenteroides JCM 9696T. However, the strains in
group A could not be identified to the species level on the basis
of phenotypical characteristics. The DNA-DNA hybridization
results demonstrated that the group A isolates and Weissella
paramesenteroides and the group B isolates and L. pseudomesenteroides had DNA homology values of above 84 and 85%, respectively, showing that the strains in groups A and B could be
assigned to the species W. paramesenteroides and L. pseudomesenteroides, respectively. This is the first report of the
identification of Weissella strains from forage crops.
Lin et al. (12) reported that epiphytic LAB play a major
role in silage fermentation, and the numbers of LAB have become a
significant factor in predicting the adequacy of silage fermentation and determining whether to apply silage bacterial inoculants. Among
epiphytic LAB, lactic acid-producing cocci, e.g., streptococci, leuconostocs, pediococci, lactococci, and enterococci, start lactate fermentation in silage, creating an aerobic environment suitable for
the development of lactobacilli, although it was shown that they grew
vigorously only in the early stage of ensiling processes (2). In contrast with these lactic acid-producing cocci,
lactobacilli play an important role in promoting lactic acid
fermentation for a longer time. Epiphytic lactobacilli counts on silage
crops are usually low and variable when the lactobacilli reach a level
of at least 105 CFU g of FM
1 silage stores
well (9). However, as shown in Table 1, the low number of
lactobacilli (<103 CFU g of FM
1) and high
numbers of aerobic bacteria (>105 CFU g of
FM
1) present in the material suggested that the
numbers of microbes during silage fermentation should be controlled.
In this study, higher numbers of LAB were observed at an early stage of
ensiling in LAB-treated silages than in the control silage. The FG 5- and FG 13-treated silages were unable to inhibit the growth of aerobic
bacteria and clostridia and to improve silage quality. The most
plausible explanation lies in the physiological properties of LAB. The
FG 5 and FG 13 strains were heterofermentative LAB which could not grow
below pH 4.5. During silage fermentation, the leuconostocs grew
vigorously only in the early stage of ensiling and they ferment WSC to
produce D-lactate, CO2, and acetate; in addition, the pH value of silage did not decline to less than 4.0, allowing the butyric fermentation by clostridia to occur. On the other
hand, the SL 1-treated silages had significantly (P < 0.05) lower pHs, ammonia nitrogen contents, DM losses, and gas
production but significantly (P < 0.05) higher lactic
acid content and higher proportions of L-isomer to total
lactic acid compared with the control silage. These results may be
evidence that the SL 1 strain used in this study was a
homofermentative LAB which produced only L-lactic acid
and may grow at low pH conditions. Therefore, inoculation with the SL 1 may result in beneficial effects by promoting the propagation of LAB
and by inhibiting the growth of clostridia and aerobic bacteria, as
well as by decreasing the amount of gas production and DM loss.
It is well-known that silage containing very large amounts of
D-lactic acid may result in lactic acidosis in ruminants
(7). Schadt and Johnson (19) found that the
production of lactate in silage largely involves the
D-isomer. Cai and Kumai (2) reported that on
dairy farms, the proportion of D-isomer to total lactic acid in silage was 62 to 68%. In this study, the leuconostocs and weissellae were isolated from silage samples and when
silage was reinoculated with these strains, the proportions of
D-lactate increased. Therefore, the epiphytic
Leuconostoc and Weissella species might change
and influence the proportion of lactate isomer during silage
fermentation.
These results confirmed that the inoculation with L-lactic
acid-producing lactobacilli had beneficial effects on decreasing the
proportion of D-isomer to total lactic acid and improving silage quality. However, the heterofermentative LAB strains
Weissella paramesenteroides FG 5 and Leuconostoc
pseudomesenteroides FG 13 did not improve silage quality and may
cause some fermentation loss.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
We thank J. A. Hudson (Environmental Science and
Research Ltd., Christchurch Science Centre, New Zealand) for reading
the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Japan Collection
of Microorganisms, The Institute of Physical and Chemical
Research, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan. Phone: (81)
48-467-9562. Fax: (81) 48-462-4619. E-mail:
cai{at}ulmus.riken.go.jp.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Benno, Y.
1996.
A semi-automatic system for bacterial identification.
Riken reviw.
12:57-58.
|
| 2.
|
Cai, Y., and S. Kumai.
1994.
The proportion of lactate isomers in farm silage and the influence of inoculation with lactic acid bacteria on the proportion of L-lactate in silage.
Jpn. J. Zootech. Sci.
65:788-795.
|
| 3.
|
Cai, Y.,
S. Ohmomo, and S. Kumai.
1994.
Distribution and lactate fermentation characteristics of lactic acid bacteria on forage crops and grasses.
J. Jpn. Soc. Grassl. Sci.
39:420-428.
|
| 4.
|
Cai, Y.,
S. Ohmomo,
M. Ogawa, and S. Kumai.
1997.
Effect of NaCl-tolerant lactic acid bacteria and NaCl on the fermentation characteristics and aerobic stability of silage.
J. Appl. Microbiol.
83:307-313[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Dewar, W. A., and P. McDonald.
1961.
Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with toluene.
J. Sci. Food Agricul.
12:790-795.
|
| 6.
|
Duncan, D. B.
1955.
Multiple range and multiple F test.
Biometrics
11:1-42.
|
| 7.
|
Dunlop, R. H.
1972.
Pathogenesis of ruminant lactic acidosis.
Adv. Vet. Sci. Comp. Med.
16:250-302.
|
| 8.
|
Ezaki, T.,
Y. Hashimoto, and E. Yabuuchi.
1989.
Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
39:224-229[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Hellings, P.,
G. Bertin, and M. Vanbelle.
1985.
Effect of lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation, p. 932-933.
In
Proceedings of the 15th International Grassland Congress. Kyotosyppan, Kyoto, Japan.
|
| 10.
|
Kozaki, M.,
T. Uchimura, and S. Okada.
1992.
Experimental manual for lactic acid bacteria, p. 29-72.
Asakurasyoten, Tokyo, Japan.
|
| 11.
|
Lin, C.,
K. K. Bolsen,
B. E. Brent,
R. A. Hart,
J. T. Dickerson,
A. M. Feyerherm, and W. R. Aimutis.
1991.
Epiphytic microflora on alfalfa and whole-plant corn.
J. Dairy Sci.
75:2484-2493.
|
| 12.
|
Lin, C.,
K. K. Bolsen,
B. E. Brent, and D. Y. C. Fung.
1992.
Epiphytic lactic acid bacteria succession during the pre-ensiling and ensiling periods of alfalfa and maize.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
73:375-387.
|
| 13.
|
McDonald, P.,
N. Henderson, and S. Heron.
1991.
The biochemistry of silage, 2nd ed., p. 48-249.
Chalcombe Publications, Marlow, Berkshire, Great Britain.
|
| 14.
|
Morimoto, H.
1971.
Experimental method of animal nutrition, p. 284-285.
Youkendo, Tokyo, Japan.
|
| 15.
|
Muck, R. E.
1989.
Initial bacterial numbers on lucerne prior to ensiling.
Grass Forage Sci.
44:19-25.
|
| 16.
|
Ohmomo, S.,
O. Tanaka, and H. Kitamoto.
1993.
Analysis of organic acids in silage by high-performance liquid chromatography.
Bull. Nat. Grassl. Res. Inst.
48:51-56.
|
| 17.
|
Ruser, B.
1989.
Erfassung und Identifizierung des epiphytischen Milchsaurebakterienbesatzes auf Gras und Mais in abhangigkeit von Standort, Sorte, Entwicklungsstadium sowie Ernte- und Klimaeinflussen. Ph.D. Dissertation.
Institute of Grassland and Forage Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
|
| 18.
|
Saitou, H., and K. Miura.
1963.
Preparation of transforming deoxyribonucleic acid by phenol treatment.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
72:619-629[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Schaadt, H., and R. R. Johnson.
1968.
Effect of maturity treatment on D( ) and L(+)lactic acid in corn silage.
J. Dairy Sci.
51:802-805[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Sharp, R.,
P. G. Hooper, and D. G. Armstrong.
1994.
The digestion of grass silages produced using inoculants of lactic acid bacteria.
Grass Forage Sci.
49:42-53.
|
| 21.
|
Stirling, A. R., and R. Whittenbury.
1963.
Sources of lactic acid bacteria occurring in silage.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
26:86-92.
|
| 22.
|
Tamaoka, J., and K. Komagata.
1984.
Determination of DNA base composition by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
124:11-16.
|
| 23.
|
Tanaka, O., and S. Ohmomo.
1994.
A repeatable model system for silage fermentation in culture tubes.
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.
58:1407-1411.
|
| 24.
|
Ueno, K.
1982.
Procedures for isolation and identification of anaerobic bacteria, p. 79-93.
Saikonsyupan, Tokyo, Japan.
|
| 25.
|
Weinberg, Z. G.,
G. Ashbell,
Y. Hen, and A. Azrieli.
1993.
The effect of applying lactic acid bacteria at ensiling on the aerobic stabiling of silages.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
75:512-518.
|
| 26.
|
Yamamoto, K. S.,
S. Utagawa,
T. Kodama, and T. Morichi.
1986.
Isolation method of microorganisms, p. 435-444.
R and D Planning, Tokyo, Japan.
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 1998, p. 2982-2987, Vol. 64, No. 8
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Ennahar, S., Cai, Y.
(2004). Genetic evidence that Weissella kimchii Choi et al. 2002 is a later heterotypic synonym of Weissella cibaria Bjorkroth et al. 2002. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.
54: 463-465
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ennahar, S., Cai, Y., Fujita, Y.
(2003). Phylogenetic Diversity of Lactic Acid Bacteria Associated with Paddy Rice Silage as Determined by 16S Ribosomal DNA Analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 444-451
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kitamoto, H. K., Hasebe, A., Ohmomo, S., Suto, E. G., Muraki, M., Iimura, Y.
(1999). Prevention of Aerobic Spoilage of Maize Silage by a Genetically Modified Killer Yeast, Kluyveromyces lactis, Defective in the Ability To Grow on Lactic Acid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65: 4697-4700
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cai, Y., Kumai, S., Ogawa, M., Benno, Y., Nakase, T.
(1999). Characterization and Identification of Pediococcus Species Isolated from Forage Crops and Their Application for Silage Preparation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65: 2901-2906
[Abstract]
[Full Text]