Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 1998, p. 3313-3319, Vol. 64, No. 9
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Identification and Characterization of
Leuconostoc carnosum, Associated with Production and
Spoilage of Vacuum-Packaged, Sliced, Cooked Ham
K. J.
Björkroth,1,*
P.
Vandamme,2 and
H.
J.
Korkeala1
Department of Food and Environmental Hygiene,
University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland,1
and
Department of Microbiology, University of Ghent, Ghent,
Belgium2
Received 26 February 1998/Accepted 15 June 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Leuconostoc carnosum was shown to be the specific
spoilage organism in vacuum-packaged, sliced, cooked ham showing
spoilage during 3 weeks of shelf life. Identification of the specific
spoilage organism was done by use of phenotypic data and
ClaI, EcoRI, and HindIII reference
strain ribopatterns. One hundred L. carnosum isolates
associated with the production and spoilage of the ham were further
characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), together with
some meat-associated Leuconostoc species: L. citreum, L. gelidum, L. mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum, and L. mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides. ApaI and
SmaI digests divided the industrial L. carnosum
strains into 25 different PFGE types, ApaI and
SmaI types being consistent. Only one specific PFGE type was associated with the spoiled packages. This type also was detected in air and raw-meat mass samples. The spoilage strain did not produce
bacteriocins. Only seven isolates belonging to three different PFGE
types produced bacteriocins. Similarity analysis of the industrial L. carnosum strains revealed a homogeneous cluster which
could be divided into eight subclusters consisting of strains having at
most three-fragment differences. The L. carnosum cluster
was clearly distinguished from the other meat-associated leuconostoc clusters, with the exception of the L. carnosum type
strain. Ribotyping can be very helpful in the identification of
L. carnosum, but its discriminatory power is too weak for
strain characterization. PFGE provides good discrimination for studies
dealing with the properties of homogeneous L. carnosum
strains.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are the
major spoilage bacteria in vacuum-packaged, cooked meat products
(1, 2, 10, 13, 25, 27, 31, 38, 44, 47, 56).
Lactobacillus and Leuconostoc have been the main
genera associated with the spoilage of these products,
Lactobacillus sake and Lactobacillus curvatus
being isolated commonly (12, 16, 18, 19, 24, 27, 30, 35, 39,
43-46). Compared to aerobic spoilage bacteria, spoilage LAB produce their typical sensory changes, such as souring, gas formation, and/or slime formation, later, at the stationary phase (29, 44), and a vacuum-packaged product is usually expected to
maintain good sensory quality for at least 3 to 4 weeks. However,
due to an increased level of LAB contamination or particularly active spoilage strains, spoilage may occur during the shelf-life period, subjecting the producer to recalls (30, 31, 33, 46).
In an LAB contamination study of vacuum-packaged, sliced, cooked ham,
982 LAB isolates from the spoiled product and production line were
characterized in order to determine the underlying reasons for
fluctuations in product quality (4, 6). Many lots had been
showing spoilage changes, i.e., sour odor and taste, before the sell-by
date. In that study, ribotyping (21) was used as a tool for
contamination analysis. Based on EcoRI and
HindIII ribopatterns, two major spoilage LAB types,
types G and A, were detected. Contamination with these spoilage LAB was
shown to have occurred postcooking, and a probable site of air-mediated
contamination from the macerated raw-meat mass to the cooked product
was revealed. Because type G showed the typical EcoRI and
HindIII ribopatterns of L. sake
(5), no further identification or characterization studies
were warranted. However, the most important specific spoilage organism,
type A, was not identified to the species level. Type A had been
detected as the dominant type in the macerated raw-meat mass and in the
spoiled packages with the strongest changes in sensory characteristics
(6). It had also persisted in the plant during the 1-year
study period, consisting of two separate large-scale contamination
experiments (4, 6).
In this study, we set out to identify type A LAB to the species level
and characterize in more detail the 100 isolates possessing the type A
EcoRI and HindIII ribopatterns. Since
phenotypic characteristics alone are seldom sufficient for
species identification of LAB (15), a reference strain
library was created by ribotyping and was used with phenotypic
data. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was applied in
order to provide further strain-level characterization. Production of
bacteriocins was determined for evaluation of the impact of this
characteristic in a population associated with process contamination
and product spoilage.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains.
One hundred type A LAB possessing the
same EcoRI and HindIII ribopatterns had been
isolated during a contamination study of a meat plant (6).
All isolates were gram-positive, oval cocci isolated from a macerated
raw-meat mass, air in the macerating room, surfaces and air in the
cooking room, worker's gloves, surfaces of the ham prior to slicing,
and vacuum-packaged, sliced, cooked ham cultured on the sell-by date.
Isolates originating from different sources are listed in Table
1.
In order to obtain a library for species identification, the following
reference strains were ribotyped with
ClaI,
EcoRI,
and
HindIII:
Leuconostoc
carnosum NCFB (National Collection of
Food Bacteria)
2776
T,
Leuconostoc citreum (
Leuconostoc
amelibiosum) D1 (
35),
Leuconostoc fallax
CCUG (Culture Collection of University of Gothenburg)
30061
T,
Leuconostoc gelidum NCFB
2775
T,
Leuconostoc lactis CCUG
30064
T,
Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp.
mesenteroides DSM (Deutsche
Sammlung von Mikroorganismen)
20343
T,
Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp.
cremoris CCUG 21965
T,
Leuconostoc
mesenteroides subsp.
dextranicum DSM
20484
T,
Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides DSM
20193
T,
Weissella halotolerans ATCC (American
Type Culture Collection)
35410
T,
Weissella
viridescens ATCC 12706
T, and
Weissella
paramesenteroides DSM 20288
T. In addition, the
previously established (
5,
7)
ClaI,
EcoRI,
and
HindIII
Lactobacillus
ribotypes were compared with the
Leuconostoc and
Weissella ribotypes characterized in this study.
The meat-associated reference strains
L. carnosum NCFB
2776
T,
L. citreum (
L. amelibiosum) D1
(
35),
L. gelidum NCFB 2775
T,
L. mesenteroides subsp.
dextranicum DSM
20484
T,
L. mesenteroides subsp.
mesenteroides DSM 20343
T,
L. pseudomesenteroides DSM 20193
T, and
W. paramesenteroides DSM 20288
T were characterized by
PFGE along with the industrial isolates.
All strains were maintained in MRS broth (Difco, Detroit, Mich.) at

70°C and cultured with MRS broth or MRS agar (Oxoid,
Basingstoke,
United Kingdom) as previously described (
28).
Phenotypic characterization.
The anaerobic growth of all
industrial isolates on Rogosa selective Lactobacillus agar
(Orion Diagnostica, Espoo, Finland) was determined, and the scheme of
Villiani et al. (55) was used for the presumptive
identification of Leuconostoc spp. Gas production from
glucose was tested with modified MRS broth in Durham tubes (51). Production of ammonia from arginine was observed by
the method of Briggs (14), and dextran formation was studied
with 5% sucrose-containing agar (22). Fermentation of
carbohydrates was determined by use of the API 50 CH
Lactobacillus identification system (Biomerieux, Marcy
l'Etoile, France) for five randomly selected isolates (I27a, M1f, V8a,
M6f, and P31a), which were also tested for the ability to produce
different lactic acid isomers by an enzymatic method (57)
with D- and L-lactate dehydrogenases (Boehringer GmbH, Mannheim, Federal Republic of Germany). The five
randomly selected isolates were also tested for growth in MRS broth at
8, 10, 15, and 37°C.
Bacteriocin determination.
The agar spot test method
modified by Schillinger and Lücke (48) was used for
screening bacteriocin activity. Based on existing literature, L. mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides DSM 20343T was selected as the indicator bacterium (3, 26,
40, 54, 58).
In vitro isolation of DNA and ribotyping for species
identification.
Reference strains and the five randomly selected
industrial isolates, already known to possess similar EcoRI
and HindIII ribotypes, were characterized with
ClaI, EcoRI, and HindIII (New
England BioLabs, Beverly, Mass.). These enzymes were selected because they characterize LAB well (4-6). DNA was isolated by the
guanidium thiocyanate method of Pitcher et al. (42) as
modified by Björkroth and Korkeala (4) by combined
lysozyme and mutanolysin treatments. Restriction endonuclease treatment
of 3 µg of DNA was done as specified by the manufacturer (New England
BioLabs). Genomic blotting was done by vacuum blotting (Vacugene;
Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden), and the ribosomal DNA probe for ribotyping
was labeled by reverse transcription (avian myeloblastosis virus
reverse transcriptase [Promega, Madison, Wis.]; Dig DNA labeling kit
[Boehringer]) as previously described by Blumberg et al.
(11). Membranes were hybridized at 68°C as described by
Björkroth and Korkeala (5). Similarity between all
ribopatterns was determined visually.
In situ DNA isolation and PFGE.
Cells were harvested from 2 ml of MRS broth cultures grown overnight at 30°C. DNA isolation in
situ from agarose blocks was performed as described by Maslow et al.
(37) with the modifications described by Björkroth et
al. (9). Initially, 11 rare-cutting restriction enzymes,
ApaI, AscI, EagI, MluI,
NotI, NruI, RsrII, SacII,
SmaI, XbaI, and XhoI, were tested for
the cleavage of DNA of three strains (NCFB 2776T, M6f, and
I27a). ApaI and SmaI, which produced convenient
numbers of fragments with discriminatory patterns, were chosen for the cleavage of all strains. The samples were electrophoresed through a
1.2% (wt/vol) agarose gel (SeaKem Gold; FMC BioProducts, Rockland, Maine) in 0.5× TBE (45 mM Tris, 4.5 mM boric acid [pH 8.3], 1 mM
sodium EDTA) at 14°C by use of a Gene Navigator system with the
hexagonal electrode (Pharmacia). Interpolation ramping from 0.5 to
15 s for 20 h at 200 V was used for both enzyme digests.
PFGE data management.
Photographs of the PFGE banding
patterns were scanned with a ScanJet 4c/T scanner (Hewlett-Packard Co.,
Boise, Idaho). Numerical analysis of macrorestriction patterns was
performed with a GelCompar system (version 4.0; Applied Maths, Kortijk,
Belgium). The similarity between all pairs was expressed by Dice
coefficient correlation, and clustering by the unweighted pair-group
method with arithmetic averages was used for the construction of the
dendrogram. Types were considered closely related (53) in
the presence of at most a three-band difference (one genetic event).
This relationship was indicated in the type nomination by a shared
roman numeral.
 |
RESULTS |
The 100 isolates did not grow on Rogosa selective
Lactobacillus agar; all produced gas from glucose but did
not produce ammonia from arginine. Fifteen isolates (11 different PFGE
types) produced slime from sucrose, and bacteriocins were produced
by 7 isolates (Table 1). The five isolates tested produced only
D-lactic acid and had similar fermentation patterns for the
utilization of ribose, D-glucose,
D-fructose,
-methyl-D-glucoside,
N-acetylglucosamine, cellobiose, saccharose, trehalose,
-gentiobiose, D-turanose, and gluconate. Growth occurred
at 8, 10, and 15°C but not at 37°C.
Previously determined oval cell morphology and the phenotypic
characteristics typical of leuconostocs led to the comparison with the
Leuconostoc and Weissella type strains. Figures
1, 2, and
3 show that the ClaI,
EcoRI, and HindIII ribotypes, respectively, of the reference strains differed clearly from the
Lactobacillus ribotypes obtained previously (5,
7). The ClaI, EcoRI, and HindIII ribopatterns of the industrial isolates were
found to be identical to those of L. carnosum NCFB
2776T (Fig. 1, 2, and 3, lanes 10). All of the other type
strains were distinct from L. carnosum NCFB
2776T. Based on the phenotypic data and the identical
ribopatterns, the industrial isolates were classified as L. carnosum. HindIII and EcoRI generated
the least distinguishing ribotypes for the Leuconostoc and
Weissella species. ClaI was the only enzyme
distinguishing L. mesenteroides subsp.
mesenteroides from L. mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum (Fig. 1, lanes 5 and 7).

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
ClaI ribopatterns. Lanes 4 and 11, phage
lambda DNA cleaved with HindIII as a fragment size
marker; lane 1, Weissella viridescens ATCC
12706T; lane 2, Weissella halotolerans ATCC
35410T; lane 3, Weissella paramesenteroides DSM
20288T; lane 5, Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp.
mesenteroides DSM 20343T; lane 6, Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. cremoris CCUG
21965T; lane 7, Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp.
dextranicum DSM 20484T; lane 8, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides DSM 20193T; lane
9, Leuconostoc carnosum NCFB 2776T; lane 10, Leuconostoc gelidum NCFB 2775T; lane 12, Leuconostoc lactis CCUG 30064T; lane 13, Leuconostoc fallax CCUG 30061T; lane 14, Leuconostoc citreum (Leuconostoc amelibiosum)
D1.
|
|

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
EcoRI ribopatterns. Lanes 4 and 11, phage
lambda DNA cleaved with HindIII as a fragment size
marker; lane 1, Weissella viridescens ATCC
12706T; lane 2, Weissella halotolerans ATCC
35410T; lane 3, Weissella paramesenteroides DSM
20288T; lane 5, Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp.
mesenteroides DSM 20343T; lane 6, Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. cremoris CCUG
21965T; lane 7, Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp.
dextranicum DSM 20484T; lane 8, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides DSM 20193T; lane
9, Leuconostoc carnosum NCFB 2776T; lane 10, Leuconostoc gelidum NCFB 2775T; lane 12, Leuconostoc lactis CCUG 30064T; lane 13, Leuconostoc fallax CCUG 30061T; lane 14, Leuconostoc citreum (Leuconostoc amelibiosum)
D1.
|
|

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
HindIII ribopatterns. Lanes 4 and 11, phage lambda DNA cleaved with HindIII as a fragment size
marker; lane 1, Weissella viridescens ATCC
12706T; lane 2, Weissella halotolerans ATCC
35410T; lane 3, Weissella paramesenteroides DSM
20288T; lane 5, Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp.
mesenteroides DSM 20343T; lane 6, Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. cremoris CCUG
21965T; lane 7, Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp.
dextranicum DSM 20484T; lane 8, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides DSM 20193T; lane
9, Leuconostoc carnosum NCFB 2776T; lane 10, Leuconostoc gelidum NCFB 2775T; lane 12, Leuconostoc lactis CCUG 30064T; lane 13, Leuconostoc fallax CCUG 30061T; lane 14, Leuconostoc citreum (Leuconostoc amelibiosum)
D1.
|
|
Both ApaI and SmaI generated 25 different
patterns for the meat plant isolates when one-band differences are
noted. The ApaI types were consistent with the
SmaI types (Table 1). All meat-associated reference strains,
with the exception of L. carnosum NCFB 2776T,
were clearly distinguished from the industrial isolates (Fig. 4 and 5).
Both ApaI and SmaI resulted in convenient numbers
of fragments for macrorestriction analysis (Fig. 4). However,
SmaI cleaved the DNA efficiently, whereas some partial
digestion was occasionally noted with ApaI. Because of the
better reproducibility, SmaI patterns were chosen for the
numerical analysis.

View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
SmaI (lanes 1 to 9) and ApaI
(lanes 10 to 18) ribopatterns. Lanes 1, 9, 10, and 18, Leuconostoc carnosum NCFB 2776T; lanes 2 and 11, Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides
DSM 20343T; lanes 3 and 12, Leuconostoc
mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum DSM
20484T; lanes 4 and 13, Leuconostoc
pseudomesenteroides DSM 20193T; lanes 5 and 14, Weissella paramesenteroides DSM 20288T; lanes 6 and 15, Leuconostoc gelidum NCFB 2775T; lanes 7 and 16, Leuconostoc citreum (Leuconostoc
amelibiosum) D1; lanes 8 and 17, Leuconostoc carnosum
V-8a.
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Dendrogram based on SmaI ribopatterns. The
similarity between all pairs was expressed by Dice coefficient
correlation, and the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic
averages was used for the construction of the dendrogram.
|
|
Figure 5 shows the dendrogram of the industrial isolates and the
reference strains. L. carnosum formed a homogeneous cluster, within which eight subclusters consisted of strains having at most
three-band differences. Reference strains, with the exception of the
L. carnosum type strain, clustered separately from the industrial isolates. Isolates associated with the sensorially spoiled
products all showed the type A I-h pattern (Fig. 4, lanes 8 and 17) and
belonged to the largest cluster, consisting of A I types (Fig. 5 and
Table 1). Type A I-h was also detected in two raw-meat mass samples and
two air samples, one from the macerating room and one from the
postcooking form removal area.
 |
DISCUSSION |
L. carnosum was identified as the specific spoilage
organism in the vacuum-packaged, cooked ham studied here. This species was described along with L. gelidum by Shaw and Harding in
1989 (50). It belongs to the main Leuconostoc
cluster designated Leuconostoc sensu stricto and shares 97 to 99% rRNA homology with the other sensu stricto species: L. citreum, L. gelidum, L. lactis, L. mesenteroides, and L. pseudomesenteroides
(15). Characterization studies of L. carnosum
have been sparse and have been done with a limited number of strains
(50, 58). Studies associated with L. carnosum
have mainly focused on the production and purification of bacteriocins
produced by this species (3, 20, 23, 26, 40, 41, 49, 52,
54).
L. carnosum seems to be strongly associated with ham
products. In an earlier meat production plant contamination study
(6), type A was found to dominate in the microflora of the
raw-pork mass macerated overnight. In this plant, we noted that
L. carnosum contamination occurred mainly in ham, whereas
L. sake and L. curvatus have been detected in a
variety of products (4, 6). Approximately 36% of the
spoilage flora in Vienna sausages has been reported to consist of
leuconostocs (17). When these Leuconostoc species were identified (18), the absence of L. carnosum
was emphasized. In another characterization study of the LAB causing
spoilage in vacuum-packaged, processed meats, a high prevalence of
bacteriocin-producing psychrotropic leuconostocs was revealed
(58). In that study, nine isolates were identified as
L. carnosum; eight of these nine originated from different
types of ham and one originated from sliced turkey. The strains forming
the L. carnosum cluster (III) in the work describing this
species (50) were from cold-stored, vacuum-packaged beef,
pork, bacon, cooked ham, and luncheon meat. Compared with ham and other
whole-meat products, emulsion sausages have more variable raw
materials, such as different meat mixtures, pork skin emulsion, and
spices, and undergo a different type of processing. The process and
ingredients used for ham manufacturing may favor the survival and/or
growth of L. carnosum. However, an adequate cooking process,
considered to be the most important factor destroying LAB on products
prior to packaging (1, 33, 34, 36), and the use of nitrite
are similar in the production of emulsion sausages and whole-meat
products.
PFGE characterization of L. carnosum confirmed the
assumption that the raw-meat mass was the major source of
contamination. The type of LAB contamination in a product has been
considered to reflect the type of contamination in the processing
facility (25, 38). Various LAB types were shown to
contaminate the environment associated with the ham processing line
studied here (4, 6). The greatest diversity in the different
types of LAB was found in the environmental surface samples (4,
6). However, the majority of these LAB types have never been
isolated from packaged products (4, 6). Only type A I-h
isolates associated with the spoiled packages (V isolates), raw
material (M5o and M6a isolates), and air of the macerating room
(isolate I2b) and postcooking form removal area (isolate I27a)
contaminated the products before they were transferred to the
slicing-packaging department. The products were contaminated with a
spoilage organism from the raw-meat mass before they entered the
slicing line. In this case, the slicing line and the slicing room were
not the main site and source of contamination, as is so often thought (25, 38). This route of contamination may be more common
than is generally considered, also explaining the link between raw-meat mass and cooked ham.
Identification of species of the genus Leuconostoc is
difficult (15, 55), which apparently is the main reason for
the sparse population characterizations published.
Leuconostoc spp. are phenotypically related to
Weissella spp., heterofermentative lactobacilli, and
pediococci and form a natural phylogenetic group with Weissella
confusa, W. halotolerans, Weissella
kandleri, Weissella minor, and W. viridescens (15). Due to the variable results obtained,
sugar fermentation patterns are of little value in the species
identification and could lead to misclassification (15). For
presumptive identification, the scheme proposed by Villiani et al.
(55) was found practical. However, in this scheme L. carnosum is supposed to form dextran. Only 15 of the 100 isolates tested here (11 of the established 25 PFGE types) formed slime from
sucrose, lessening the value of this characteristic in L. carnosum identification.
It has been stated that reliable differentiation between L. carnosum and L. gelidum is impossible without DNA-DNA
hybridization (15). Our results indicate that ribotyping can
be used to distinguish L. carnosum from the other
phenotypically related leuconostocs. However, care must be taken when
enzymes are selected for species identification by ribotyping. Using
HindIII-based ribopatterns, Villiani et al.
(55) could not distinguish L. mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides from L. mesenteroides subsp.
dextranicum and L. lactis. We found
HindIII and EcoRI to be the least
distinguishing enzymes and ClaI to be the only enzyme
generating a clear one-band shift in the patterns of these two
subspecies (Fig. 1, lanes 5 and 7). ClaI may thus provide
better results for the discrimination of L. mesenteroides
subspecies. However, the HindIII pattern of the L. lactis type strain was clearly distinguished from the patterns of
the L. mesenteroides subspecies (Fig. 3, lanes 5, 7, and
12). Despite its value in species identification and LAB contamination studies dealing with a diversity of species, ribotyping cannot be used
for strain characterization when such a homogeneous population, such as
the population of L. carnosum isolated from the meat
production plant studied here, is assessed.
Only one type, A I-h (Fig. 4, lanes 8 and 17), from the largest
lineage, was associated with the sensorially spoiled packages; however,
even the production environment was not overwhelmingly contaminated by
this specific organism. Strains of this type may possess
characteristics that aid in growth niche occupation. Specific spoilage
organisms have been considered to have better competitive ability,
enabling them to prevail in the microflora present (8, 13,
32). Differences in the generation time, production of bacteriocins, strong ability to produce slime or volatile compounds causing sensorial spoilage, and better resistance to different stress
factors, such as cold, heat, and disinfectants, are factors considered
to be associated with specific spoilage organisms. For the L. carnosum population studied here, the production of bacteriocins
was not found to be a common characteristic, as reported by Yang and
Ray (58). The nine L. carnosum isolates studied by Yang and Ray (58) all inhibited L. mesenteroides. The true general impact of bacteriocin production
in the development of spoilage flora is still not clear. Studies of
bacteriocin production have mainly focused on the use of bacteriocins
or cultures producing bacteriocins as biopreservatives.
Biopreservatives are inoculated at a high initial concentration or a
dense population in a freshly prepared product. This situation differs
clearly from the situation in which some or one species in a
contaminating flora gradually occupies a niche in a package and,
finally, when reaching the stationary phase, spoils the product.
Molecular typing methods also provide valuable information for applied
microbiology. They can contribute to knowledge of different bacterial
populations associated with food processing and enable future research
to be focused accurately on specific spoilage organisms and their
specific characteristics. Such work will rely mainly on the reliable
species identification and good strain characterization of specific
spoilage organisms.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Food and Environmental Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,
University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 57, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Phone: 358-50-5976555. Fax: 358-9-70849718. E-mail:
johanna.björkroth{at}helsinki.fi.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Allen, J. R., and E. M. Foster.
1960.
Spoilage of vacuum-packed sliced processed meats during refrigerated storage.
Food Res.
25:19-25.
|
| 2.
|
Alm, F.,
I. Erichsen, and N. Molin.
1961.
The effect of vacuum packaging on some sliced processed meat products as judged by organoleptic and bacteriological analysis.
Food Technol.
15:199-203.
|
| 3.
|
Becker, B.,
W. H. Holzapfel, and A. von Holy.
1994.
Effect of pH and the bacteriocin carnocin 54 on growth and cell morphology of two Leuconostoc strains.
Lett. Appl. Microbiol.
19:126-128.
|
| 4.
|
Björkroth, J., and H. Korkeala.
1996.
Evaluation of Lactobacillus sake contamination in vacuum packaged sliced cooked meat products by ribotyping.
J. Food Prot.
59:398-401.
|
| 5.
|
Björkroth, J., and H. Korkeala.
1996.
rRNA gene restriction patterns as a characterization tool for Lactobacillus sake strains producing ropy slime.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
30:293-302[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Björkroth, J., and H. Korkeala.
1997.
Use of rRNA gene restriction patterns to evaluate lactic acid bacterium contamination of vacuum-packaged sliced cooked whole-meat products in a meat processing plant.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63:448-453[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Björkroth, J., and H. Korkeala.
1997.
Characterization of Lactobacillus fructivorans spoilage in ketchup.
J. Food Prot.
60:505-509.
|
| 8.
|
Björkroth, J., and H. Korkeala.
1997.
Ropy slime-producing Lactobacillus sake strains possess a strong competitive ability against a commercial biopreservate.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
38:117-123[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Björkroth, J.,
J. Ridell, and H. Korkeala.
1996.
Characterization of Lactobacillus sake strains associated with production of ropy slime by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
31:59-68[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Blickstad, E., and G. Molin.
1983.
The microbial flora of smoked pork loin and frankfurter sausage stored in different gas atmospheres at 4°C.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
54:45-56[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Blumberg, H. M.,
J. A. Kielbauch, and I. K. Wachsmuth.
1991.
Molecular epidemiology of Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 infections: use of chromosomal DNA restriction fragment length polymorphism of rRNA genes.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:2368-2374[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Borch, E., and G. Molin.
1988.
Numerical taxonomy of psychrotrophic lactic acid bacteria from prepacked meat and meat products.
Antonie Leeuwenhoek
54:301-323.
|
| 13.
|
Borch, E.,
M.-L. Kant-Muermans, and Y. Blixt.
1996.
Bacterial spoilage of meat and cured meat products.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
33:103-120[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Briggs, M.
1953.
The classification of lactobacilli by means of physiological tests.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
54:45-56.
|
| 15.
|
Dellaglio, F.,
L. M. T. Dicks, and S. Torriani.
1995.
The genus Leuconostoc, p. 235-278.
In
B. J. B. Wood, and W. Holzapfel (ed.), The genera of lactic acid bacteria. Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
|
| 16.
|
Dykes, G. A.,
T. J. Britz, and A. von Holy.
1994.
Numerical taxonomy and identification of lactic acid bacteria from spoiled, vacuum-packaged Vienna sausages.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
76:246-252[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Dykes, G. A.,
T. E. Cloete, and A. von Holy.
1991.
Quantification of microbiological populations associated with the manufacture of vacuum-packaged, smoked Vienna sausages.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
13:239-248[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Dykes, G. A.,
T. E. Cloete, and A. von Holy.
1994.
Identification of Leuconostoc species associated with the spoilage of vacuum-packaged Vienna sausages by DNA-DNA hybridization.
Food Microbiol.
11:271-274.
|
| 19.
|
Dykes, G. A.,
T. E. Cloete, and A. von Holy.
1995.
Taxonomy of lactic acid bacteria associated with vacuum-packaged processed meat spoilage by multivariate analysis of cellular fatty acids.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
28:89-100[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Felix, J. V.,
M. A. Papathanasopoulos,
A. A. Smith,
A. von Holy, and J. W. Hastings.
1994.
Characterization of leucocin B-Ta11a: a bacteriocin from Leuconostoc carnosum Ta11a isolated from meat.
Curr. Microbiol.
29:207-212[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Grimont, F., and P. A. D. Grimont.
1986.
Ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene restriction as potential taxonomic tools.
Ann. Inst. Pasteur/Microbiol.
137B:165-175.
|
| 22.
|
Harrigan, W. F., and M. E. McCance.
1976.
Laboratory methods in food and dairy microbiology.
Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 23.
|
Hastings, J. W.,
M. E. Stiles, and A. von Holy.
1994.
Bacteriocins of leuconostocs isolated from meat. A review paper.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
24:75-81[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Holzapfel, W. H., and E. S. Gerber.
1986.
Predominance of Lactobacillus curvatus and Lactobacillus sake in the spoilage association of vacuum-packaged meat products, p. 26.
In
Abstracts of the 32nd European Meeting of Meat Research Workers.
|
| 25.
|
Kempton, A. G., and S. R. Bobier.
1970.
Bacterial growth in refrigerated, vacuum-packed luncheon meats.
Can. J. Microbiol.
16:287-297[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Keppler, K.,
R. Geisen, and W. H. Holzapfel.
1994.
An -amylase sensitive bacteriocin of Leuconostoc carnosum.
Food Microbiol.
11:39-45.
|
| 27.
|
Korkeala, H., and P. Mäkelä.
1989.
Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from vacuum-packed cooked ring sausages.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
9:33-43[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Korkeala, H., and S. Lindroth.
1987.
Differences in microbial growth in the surface layer and at the center of vacuum-packaged cooked ring sausage.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
4:105-110.
|
| 29.
|
Korkeala, H.,
T. Alanko,
P. Mäkelä, and S. Lindroth.
1989.
Shelf-life of vacuum-packed cooked ring sausages at different chill temperatures.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
9:237-247[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Korkeala, H.,
T. Suortti, and P. Mäkelä.
1988.
Ropy slime formation in vacuum-packed cooked meat products caused by homofermentative lactobacilli and a Leuconostoc species.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
7:339-347[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Korkeala, H. J., and K. J. Björkroth.
1997.
Microbiological spoilage and contamination of vacuum-packaged cooked sausages: a review.
J. Food Prot.
60:724-731.
|
| 32.
|
Leisner, J.,
G. G. Greer, and M. E. Stiles.
1996.
Control of beef spoilage by a sulfide-producing Lactobacillus sake strain with bacteriocinogenic Leuconostoc gelidum UAL187 during anaerobic storage at 2°C.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
62:2610-2614[Abstract].
|
| 33.
|
Mäkelä, P., and H. Korkeala.
1987.
Lactobacillus contamination of cooked ring sausages at sausage processing plants.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
5:323-330.
|
| 34.
|
Mäkelä, P.,
H. Korkeala, and J. Laine.
1990.
Raw materials of cooked ring sausages as a source of spoilage lactic acid bacteria.
J. Food Prot.
53:965-968.
|
| 35.
|
Mäkelä, P.,
U. Schillinger,
H. Korkeala, and W. H. Holzapfel.
1992.
Classification of ropy slime producing lactic acid bacteria based on DNA-DNA homology, and identification of Lactobacillus sake and Leuconostoc amelibiosum as dominant spoilage organisms in meat products.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
16:167-172[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Mäkelä, P. M.,
H. J. Korkeala, and J. J. Laine.
1992.
Survival of ropy slime producing lactic acid bacteria in heat processes used in the meat industry.
Meat Sci.
31:463-471.
|
| 37.
|
Maslow, J. N.,
A. M. Slutsky, and R. D. Arbeit.
1993.
Application of pulsed-field electrophoresis to molecular epidemiology, p. 563-572.
In
D. H. Persing, T. F. Smith, F. C. Tenover, and T. J. White (ed.), Diagnostic molecular microbiology: principles and application. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 38.
|
Mol, J. H. H.,
J. E. A. Hietbring,
H. W. M. Mollen, and J. van Tinteren.
1971.
Observations on the microflora of vacuum packaged sliced cooked meat products.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
34:377-397[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Morishita, Y., and K. Shiromizu.
1986.
Characterization of lactobacilli isolated from meat and meat products.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
3:19-29.
|
| 40.
|
Papathanosopoulos, M. A.,
J. W. Hastings, and A. von Holy.
1994.
Antibacterial activity of three Leuconostoc strains isolated from vacuum-packaged processed meats.
J. Basic Microbiol.
34:173-182[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Parente, E.,
M. Moles, and A. Riccardi.
1996.
Leucocin F10, a bacteriocin from Leuconostoc carnosum.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
33:231-234[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Pitcher, D. G.,
N. A. Saunders, and R. J. Owen.
1989.
Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate.
Lett. Appl. Microbiol.
8:151-156.
|
| 43.
|
Reuter, G.
1970.
Laktobazillen und eng verwandte Mikroorganismen in Fleisch und Fleischerzeugnissen. 2. Mitteilung: die Charakterisierung der isolierten Laktobazillenstämme.
Fleischwirtschaft
50:954-962.
|
| 44.
|
Reuter, G.
1970.
Untersuchungen zur Mikroflora von verpackten, aufgeschnittenen Brüh- und Kochwürsten.
Arch. Lebensmittelhyg.
21:257-264.
|
| 45.
|
Reuter, G.
1970.
Laktobazillen und eng verwandte Mikroorganismen in Fleisch und Fleischwaren. 4. Mitteilung: die Ökologie von Laktobazillen, Leuconostoc-Species und Pediokokken.
Fleischwirtschaft
50:1397-1399.
|
| 46.
|
Reuter, G.
1975.
Classification problems, ecology and some biochemical activities of lactobacilli of meat products, p. 221-229.
In
J. C. Can, C. V. Cutting, and G. C. Whiting (ed.), Lactic acid bacteria in beverages and food. Academic Press Ltd., London, England.
|
| 47.
|
Schillinger, U., and F.-K. Lücke.
1987.
Lactic acid bacteria on vacuum-packaged meat and their influence on shelf life.
Fleischwirtschaft
67:1244-1249.
|
| 48.
|
Schillinger, U., and F.-K. Lücke.
1989.
Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus sake isolated from meat.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
55:1901-1906[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Schillinger, U.,
B. Becker, and W. H. Holzapfel.
1995.
Antilisterial activity of carnocin 54, a bacteriocin from Leuconostoc carnosum.
Food Microbiol.
12:31-37.
|
| 50.
|
Shaw, B. G., and C. D. Harding.
1989.
Leuconostoc gelidum sp. nov. and Leuconostoc carnosum sp. nov. from chill-stored meats.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
39:217-223[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Smittle, R. B., and M. C. Cirigcliano.
1992.
Salad dressings, p. 975-983.
In
C. Vanderzandt, and D. F. Splittstoesser (ed.), Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
|
| 52.
|
Stiles, M. E.
1994.
Bacteriocins produced by Leuconostoc species.
J. Dairy Sci.
77:2718-2724[Abstract].
|
| 53.
|
Tenover, F. C.,
R. D. Arbeit,
R. V. Goering,
P. A. Mickelsen,
B. E. Murray,
D. H. Persing, and B. Swaminathan.
1995.
Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:2233-2239[Medline].
|
| 54.
|
van Laack, R. L. J. M.,
U. Schillinger, and W. H. Holzapfel.
1992.
Characterization and partial purification of a bacteriocin produced by Leuconostoc carnosum LA44A.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
16:183-195[Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Villiani, F.,
G. Moschetti,
G. Blaiotta, and S. Coppola.
1997.
Characterization of Leuconostoc mesenteroides by analysis of soluble whole-cell protein pattern, DNA fingerprinting and restriction of ribosomal DNA.
J. Appl. Microbiol.
82:578-588[Medline].
|
| 56.
|
von Holy, A.,
T. E. Cloete, and W. H. Holzapfel.
1991.
Quantification and characterization of microbial populations associated with spoiled, vacuum-packed Vienna sausages.
Food Microbiol.
8:95-104.
|
| 57.
|
Von Krush, U., and A. Lompe.
1982.
Schnellest zum qualitativen Nachweiss von L (+) and D ( ) Milchsaure für die Bestimmung von Milchsaurebakterien.
Milchwissenshaft
37:65-68.
|
| 58.
|
Yang, R., and B. Ray.
1994.
Prevalence and biological control of bacteriocin-producing psychrotrophic leuconostocs associated with spoilage of vacuum-packaged processed meats.
J. Food Prot.
57:209-217.
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 1998, p. 3313-3319, Vol. 64, No. 9
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Tominaga, T., Hatakeyama, Y.
(2007). Development of Innovative Pediocin PA-1 by DNA Shuffling among Class IIa Bacteriocins. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
73: 5292-5299
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vihavainen, E., Lundstrom, H.-S., Susiluoto, T., Koort, J., Paulin, L., Auvinen, P., Bjorkroth, K. J.
(2007). Role of Broiler Carcasses and Processing Plant Air in Contamination of Modified-Atmosphere-Packaged Broiler Products with Psychrotrophic Lactic Acid Bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
73: 1136-1145
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Svec, P., Vancanneyt, M., Koort, J., Naser, S. M., Hoste, B., Vihavainen, E., Vandamme, P., Swings, J., Bjorkroth, J.
(2005). Enterococcus devriesei sp. nov., associated with animal sources. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.
55: 2479-2484
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Koort, J., Murros, A., Coenye, T., Eerola, S., Vandamme, P., Sukura, A., Bjorkroth, J.
(2005). Lactobacillus oligofermentans sp. nov., Associated with Spoilage of Modified-Atmosphere-Packaged Poultry Products. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 4400-4406
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Helmark, S., Hansen, M. E., Jelle, B., Sorensen, K. I., Jensen, P. R.
(2004). Transformation of Leuconostoc carnosum 4010 and Evidence for Natural Competence of the Organism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
70: 3695-3699
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hamasaki, Y., Ayaki, M., Fuchu, H., Sugiyama, M., Morita, H.
(2003). Behavior of Psychrotrophic Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Spoiling Cooked Meat Products. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 3668-3671
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rudi, K., Flateland, S. L., Hanssen, J. F., Bengtsson, G., Nissen, H.
(2002). Development and Evaluation of a 16S Ribosomal DNA Array-Based Approach for Describing Complex Microbial Communities in Ready-To-Eat Vegetable Salads Packed in a Modified Atmosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68: 1146-1156
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Björkroth, K. J., Geisen, R., Schillinger, U., Weiss, N., De Vos, P., Holzapfel, W. H., Korkeala, H. J., Vandamme, P.
(2000). Characterization of Leuconostoc gasicomitatum sp. nov., Associated with Spoiled Raw Tomato-Marinated Broiler Meat Strips Packaged under Modified-Atmosphere Conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
66: 3764-3772
[Abstract]
[Full Text]