Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 1999, p. 4543-4548, Vol. 65, No. 10
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Effect of Milk Proteins on Adhesion of Bacteria to
Stainless Steel Surfaces
L.-M.
Barnes,
M. F.
Lo,
M. R.
Adams, and
A. H. L.
Chamberlain*
School of Biological Sciences, University of
Surrey, Guildford, GU2 5XH, United Kingdom
Received 8 April 1999/Accepted 15 July 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Stainless steel coupons were treated with skim milk and
subsequently challenged with individual bacterial suspensions of
Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas fragi,
Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and
Serratia marcescens. The numbers of attached bacteria were determined by direct epifluorescence microscopy and compared with the
attachment levels on clean stainless steel with two different surface
finishes. Skim milk was found to reduce adhesion of S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, and S. marcescens. P. fragi and E. coli attached
in very small numbers to the clear surfaces, making the effect of any
adsorbed protein layer difficult to assess. Individual milk proteins
-casein,
-casein,
-casein, and
-lactalbumin were also found
to reduce the adhesion of S. aureus and L. monocytogenes. The adhesion of bacteria to samples treated with
milk dilutions up to 0.001% was investigated. X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy was used to determine the proportion of nitrogen in the
adsorbed films. Attached bacterial numbers were inversely related to
the relative atomic percentage of nitrogen on the surface. A comparison of two types of stainless steel surface, a 2B and a no. 8 mirror finish, indicated that the difference in these levels of surface roughness did not greatly affect bacterial attachment, and reduction in
adhesion to a milk-treated surface was still observed. Cross-linking of
adsorbed proteins partially reversed the inhibition of bacterial attachment, indicating that protein chain mobility and steric exclusion
may be important in this phenomenon.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Adhesion of microorganisms to food
processing equipment surfaces and the problems it causes are a matter
of concern to the food industry. Biofilms have the potential to act as
a chronic source of microbial contamination which may compromise food
quality and represent a significant health hazard. To control these
problems, it has been recognized that a greater understanding of the
interaction between microorganisms and food-processing surfaces is
required (7, 8, 18, 24, 25, 33, 34). Several groups have reported the ability of bacteria to attach to surfaces commonly found
in the food processing environment, such as rubber and stainless steel
(10, 17, 21, 22, 28). The increased resistance of these
sessile organisms towards disinfectants and sanitizing agents
(13) often exacerbates the problems caused by microbial fouling and can contribute to the inefficacy of cleaning in place systems (4).
Development of adsorbed layers, often termed "conditioning" of a
surface, is considered to be the first stage in biofilm formation and
has been widely demonstrated (9). Because this conditioning film is likely to change the physicochemical properties of the substratum (20, 32) and thus to influence bacterial
attachment, an understanding of these initial interactions is crucial
in identifying control measures. A variety of proteins, including milk
proteins (2, 3), have been shown to affect bacterial
adhesion to surfaces such as polystyrene (12);
hydroxyapatite (26); glass (1), rubber, and
stainless steel (16, 19, 27); silica (2); and
medical implants (30). The nature of the effect appears to
vary with the organism, substratum, and protein under investigation.
This study investigates the effect of preadsorbed, skim milk and its
individual major protein constituents on the adhesion of a number of
bacterial species to stainless steel surfaces.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial maintenance and growth.
Staphylococcus
aureus (University of Surrey Culture Collection [USCC] 1500, ASCDP 2), Listeria monocytogenes (F6861), Serratia marcescens (USCC 2156), Escherichia coli (USCC 2879),
and Pseudomonas fragi (NCIMB 11082) were all maintained on
plastic beads (Protect; Technical Service Consultant Limited,
Lancashire, United Kingdom) stored at
70°C. To produce cultures, a
single bead was placed into 50 ml of nutrient broth (Oxoid,
Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom) in a 250-ml conical flask and
incubated overnight at 25°C and 170 rpm. This culture was then used
to inoculate a second flask of nutrient broth to give an initial
concentration of 103 CFU/ml, which was incubated under the
same conditions until the required growth phase was reached. Growth
curve determinations were made by enumerating each of the organisms on
nutrient agar (Oxoid) by using the Miles and Misra technique
(23).
Cleaning of stainless steel samples.
Coupons of stainless
steel AISI 304 with a 2B finish (Rigidised Metals, Ltd., Middlesex,
United Kingdom) and no. 8 mirror finish (Parker Steel, Andover, United
Kingdom) were cut to dimensions of 2.5 by 1.0 cm (1.25 by 1.00 cm for
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy [XPS] samples) and boiled in a 2%
solution of RBS 25 (Medline Scientific, Ltd.) for 30 min. Coupons were
then sonicated (38 kHz, Kerry ultrasonication unit; Kerry,
Hertfordshire, United Kingdom) in the same solution for 30 min and then
rinsed (five times) by vortexing in 10 ml of sterile reverse osmosis
(RO) water. Degreasing in acetone for 30 min was followed by rinsing,
as previously described, and drying in a laminar air flow cabinet. The
stainless steel coupons were flame sterilized with ethanol and rinsed
briefly in sterile RO water immediately prior to use. This procedure
was found by XPS to reduce contaminating carbon to extremely low levels.
Treatment of stainless steel coupons with skim milk.
Three
cleaned stainless steel samples were placed horizontally into a glass
beaker, avoiding overlap, and 5 ml of ultrahigh-temperature-treated skim milk was added. The samples were gently swirled at approximately 40 rpm, and adhesion was allowed to take place for 2 h at 20°C. At the end of this period, the samples were each rinsed (twice) in 10 ml of sterile RO water by gently rocking three times. When investigating the effect of precoating samples with a range of milk
dilutions, samples were treated as described above by using three
samples for each milk dilution.
Treatment of stainless steel samples with individual milk
proteins.
Each of the following proteins,
-casein,
-casein,
-casein, and
-lactalbumin, was used to treat three stainless
steel coupons. The proteins were freeze-dried extracts of bovine milk
(Sigma, Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom) and solutions were prepared at a
concentration of 0.5 mM (allowing for purity status, resulting in
solutions which are the equivalent of 0.5 mM 100% protein) by adding 5 ml of sterile RO water. The solution was poured over the samples, and
adhesion was allowed to take place over 2 h at 20°C, with
swirling at 40 rpm. At the end of the adhesion period, the samples were
removed and rinsed twice in sterile RO water as described previously.
Exposure of milk-treated samples to glutaraldehyde.
Triplicate milk-treated stainless steel samples were exposed to either
5 or 10% solutions of glutaraldehyde (prepared by dilution of a stock
solution [Agar Scientific, Ltd., Essex, United Kingdom] with sterile
RO water). Samples were left in the glutaraldehyde solution for a
period of 2 h (20°C), after which they were rinsed three times
in sterile RO water. The results were compared against those from a
number of controls. These comprised samples which had received no milk
treatment, a sample treated with milk as described previously, and a
milk-treated sample exposed to sterile RO water in lieu of a
glutaraldehyde solution.
Bacterial adhesion.
Bacterial suspensions were prepared from
early-stationary-phase cultures. These were centrifuged at
approximately 900 × g for 15 min (room temperature)
and resuspended in sterile 1/4-strength Ringer's solution. This
washing process was carried out twice more. The cells were finally
resuspended in sterile 1/4-strength Ringer's solution (or a variety of
salt solutions, as specified in the Results section) and adjusted to a
concentration of 108 CFU/ml (optical density at 620 nm).
Protein-treated and untreated samples were placed vertically in
individual sterile bottles (25 ml). Ten milliliters of bacterial
suspension was added to each bottle and incubated for 2 h at
20°C under static conditions. At the end of this period, the samples
were removed and gently rinsed twice by rocking three times in sterile
1/4-strength Ringer's solution. Adhesion to both protein-treated and
untreated samples was determined on three replicate coupons. For
certain of the bacterial species, tests were also carried out in a
modified suspension solution. This involved substituting the Ringer's
suspension medium and rinse solution with Ringer's solution plus 0.1%
glucose or maximum recovery diluent (MRD [1 g of bacteriological
peptone per liter and 8.5 g of NaCl per liter]) plus 0.1%
glucose. Postadhesion rinse solutions were also modified accordingly.
Glucose solutions were made up separately, filter sterilized, and added
to media after autoclaving.
Enumeration of adhered population.
Stainless steel samples
were placed in 10 ml of 0.0025% acridine orange solution and left to
stain for 30 min. They were then rinsed twice with 10 ml of RO water
and allowed to air dry. A Leitz Dialux 20 fluorescence microscope
[Leica Microsystems (UK) Limited, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom]
fitted with an I 2 filter block was used to view the samples under oil
immersion, using a nonfluorescing immersion oil. Twenty fields were
counted for each of the three replicate coupons, unless otherwise stated.
XPS analysis of milk-coated stainless steel.
Stainless steel
coupons (1.25 by 1.0 cm) were coated with various milk dilutions and
rinsed, as previously described. The samples were allowed to air dry in
a laminar air flow cabinet and then placed in a desiccator under
vacuum, until analyzed. Samples were mounted onto specimen stubs with
double-sided tape. XPS data were collected with a VG ESCALAB Mk.II
spectrometer interfaced to a VGS 5000S data system based on a DEC PDP
11/73 computer (VG Scientific, Crawley, United Kingdom). The operating
conditions were as follows: the X-ray source (A1 K
[1486.6 eV]
radiation) was operated at a power level of 450 W (i.e., 13-kV
potential and 34-mA emission current). The spectrometer was operated in the fixed analyzer transmission mode at a pass energy of 50 eV (survey
spectra) or 20 eV (high-resolution spectra). The base pressure in the
sample chamber during analysis was approximately 3 × 10
3 mPa. Survey spectra were obtained with one scan;
high-resolution spectra were integrated over 1 to 25 scans, depending
on the intensity of the spectral region of interest. Spectral analysis
was carried out using the standard VGS 500s software for quantification
and peak fitting; quantification was based on peak areas calculated from the high-resolution spectra.
Surface roughness measurements.
Cleaned samples of 2B and
no. 8 mirror finish stainless steel were analyzed with a Zeiss confocal
laser-scanning microscope (CLSM) (Zeiss, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom)
to measure the Ra value (defined below). A
633-nm wavelength beam with a ×50 objective and a ×100 zoom was used
to analyze five random areas for each sample, and an average was
calculated. The Ra value provides the arithmetical average value of all departures from the mean line throughout the sampling length. The equation used to calculate a value
for Ra is given as:
where Zn is the sample height for each
data point and
is the mean height for a
roughness curve containing N data points.
 |
RESULTS |
Effect of milk and milk proteins on bacterial adhesion.
Pretreatment of stainless steel coupons (2B finish) with skim milk was
shown to substantially reduce attachment of S. aureus, S. marcescens, and L. monocytogenes (Fig.
1). E. coli and P. fragi attached in very small numbers to both clean and pretreated
surfaces alike (less than 1 organism/field of view). Pretreatments
conducted with the individual milk proteins
-,
-, and
-casein
and
-lactalbumin, at equal concentrations also reduced attachment of
S. aureus compared with attachment to the untreated surface
(Fig. 2). However, this effect was least
marked with
-lactalbumin. A similar effect was observed with
L. monocytogenes (data not shown).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Adhesion of a number of bacterial species to both
untreated stainless steel 2B samples and samples which have been
treated with skim milk (bars represent the standard error of the
mean).
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Effect upon the adhesion of S. aureus of
pretreating stainless steel samples with individual milk proteins (0.5 mM) (bars represent the standard error of the mean).
|
|
Effect of suspension medium.
Attachment of S. aureus to the cleaned steel surface was critically dependent on
the ionic strength of the suspending medium. With RO-purified water,
attachment was less than 1% of that observed with 1/4-strength
Ringer's solution. Individual components of Ringer's solution gave
increasing attachment in proportion to their contribution to the
overall ionic strength (Table 1). Sodium chloride, at 40 mM the major component in Ringer's solution, gave levels of attachment to clean stainless steel that were 81% of those
seen when Ringer's solution was used. When solutions of salts of other
divalent and monovalent cations were used at similar molar
concentrations (20 to 40 mM), they all showed a similar enhancement of
attachment to the clean stainless steel; however, salts of divalent
cations showed an increase of attachment to milk-treated surfaces,
particularly marked with calcium, an effect that was not apparent with
monovalent cations (Table 2).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Effect of 1/4-strength Ringer's solution and its
components on attachment levels of S. aureus to clean and
milk-treated stainless steel
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Effect of different salt solutions on the attachment
levels of S. aureus to clean and milk-treated
stainless steel
|
|
P. fragi exhibited low adhesion to clean, untreated
stainless steel. Little difference in attachment was observed when the
suspension medium of 1/4-strength Ringer's solution was supplemented
with 0.1% glucose or replaced with MRD plus 0.1% glucose (data
not
shown).
Effect of precoating the surface with milk dilutions.
Treating
stainless steel (2B finish) with a range of milk dilutions prior to
bacterial contact was investigated. The level of S. aureus
attachment remained relatively constant for steel treated with milk and
10 and 1% milk solutions. Between treatments with 1 and 0.01% milk
solutions, the numbers adhering increased sharply. A similar effect was
also observed for S. marcescens and L. monocytogenes, although with these organisms, the step-like increase in attached numbers was observed between treatments with 0.1 and 0.01% milk solutions and the numbers of S. marcescens cells adhering at the higher dilutions were lower (around 16 per field)
(Fig. 3).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Adhesion of S. aureus (A), L. monocytogenes (F6861) (B), and S. marcescens (C) to
stainless steel samples with a 2B surface finish which have been
pretreated with a range of milk dilutions (bars represent the standard
error of the mean). An asterisk indicates that the results represent
the average of 40 readings from two replicate samples.
|
|
XPS analysis of the relative atomic composition of the top 3 to 5 nm of
the different surfaces generally showed an increasing
nitrogen content
with increasing concentrations of milk applied.
When treated with
undiluted milk, the iron signal was reduced
to background levels. The
data obtained from these analyses, combined
with the bacterial adhesion
data for
S. aureus, suggested that
as the amount of nitrogen
(protein) at the surface decreased,
the bacterial attachment increased
(Fig.
4). Since there was an
inverse
relationship between the relative levels of nitrogen and
iron,
bacterial attachment and the amount of iron detected followed
a similar
trend.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
XPS analysis of stainless steel 2B surfaces indicating
levels of nitrogen (N 1s) and iron (Fe 2p) following treatment with a
range of milk dilutions, combined with adhesion data for S. aureus.
|
|
Surface roughness and wettability.
Average
Ra values for the 2B finish and the no. 8 mirror
finish, as determined by using the CLSM, were 0.412 ± 0.011 and
0.035 ± 0.004 µm (mean ± standard error), respectively.
Contact angle measurements underwater with octane droplets
(15) on a 2B surface finish, before and after milk
treatment, showed a small decrease (approximately 100) in
contact angle, indicating a slight decrease in surface hydrophilicity.
Numbers of
S. aureus and
L. monocytogenes cells
attaching to both surfaces, with and without milk treatment, are
presented
in Fig.
5. Numbers of
S. aureus cells adhering to the polished
surface were 29% less than
for the rougher 2B finish.
L. monocytogenes cells adhered in
lower numbers, with no difference between the
two surface finishes.
Bacterial adhesion to both surface finishes
was reduced substantially
following milk treatment (by 117 [79%]
and 81 [77%]
bacteria/field of view for
S. aureus and by 20 [96%]
and
22 [97%] bacteria/field of view for
L. monocytogenes on
the
2B and no. 8 finishes, respectively).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Adhesion of S. aureus and L. monocytogenes to stainless steel surfaces with either a 2B or a
no. 8 mirror surface finish, with and without surface pretreatment with
undiluted milk.
|
|
Effect of glutaraldehyde on adhesion to milk-treated stainless
steel.
Cross-linking of proteins on milk-treated steel with
glutaraldehyde increased the subsequent attachment of S. aureus and L. monocytogenes. After cross-linking,
numbers of S. aureus and L. monocytogenes cells
attaching were greater than those attaching to the native milk-treated
surface, an effect more marked with L. monocytogenes. These
levels represented 37.1 and 19.7%, respectively, of the levels
obtained with a clean stainless steel surface (Fig. 6).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Effect upon the adhesion of S. aureus and
L. monocytogenes of treating a preadsorbed milk layer with
glutaraldehyde (glut.) for 2 h compared with that of an untreated
control (bars represent the standard error of the mean). An asterisk
indicates that the results represent the average of 40 readings from
two replicate samples.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Milk is a highly perishable commodity which can be frequently in
contact with stainless steel surfaces during its processing and
storage. Skim milk was used in this work to minimize the effects of fat
and to focus on the role of proteins in bacterial attachment, since
these are likely to interact most with the hydrophilic surface of
stainless steel. A number of organisms were chosen for use in the study
due to their association with foods and potential as food-borne
pathogens or as food-spoilage organisms.
Adhesion to the milk-treated stainless steel varied with the organism
used. With the gram-positive S. aureus and L. monocytogenes cells and the gram-negative S. marcescens
cells, attachment was reduced to levels
20% of clean surface values.
In contrast, the gram-negative E. coli and P. fragi cells adhered in small numbers to the clean stainless steel
surface, with less than 1 organism per field of view, making any effect
of the protein film difficult to assess. While it has previously been
found that gram-negative organisms attached to stainless steel in
larger numbers than gram-positive organisms (27), this was
with different strains and under experimental conditions very different
from those used here. The results presented here demonstrate very
clearly the effects of a conditioning layer and of the ionic
composition of the suspending medium on attachment.
None of the proteins studied was shown to augment attachment of the
bacteria used. In 1976, Fletcher (12) found that while preadsorbed serum albumin, gelatin, fibrinogen, and pepsin all inhibited bacterial attachment to petri dishes, the basic proteins, protamine, and histone had no effect. Austin and Bergeron
(4) suggested that contact with milk solids is one reason
for lower attachment on the inside diameter of gaskets in milk
processing equipment.
In this work, adsorbed protein was clearly inhibiting the initial
attachment of bacteria. As the concentration of milk used to treat the
stainless steel surface was reduced, the iron signal initially remained
stable, indicating surface coverage with a protein layer thicker than
the iron photoelectron escape depth. However, below 1% milk, there was
a sharp increase in the iron signal, as well as a simultaneous increase
in bacterial attachment. This suggested a possible dual effect of
protein directly inhibiting bacterial attachment while increased
availability of surface iron promotes it. The presence of high
concentrations of ferrous ions in the suspending medium produced a
27.4% reduction in adhesion to clean stainless steel, possibly as a
result of its competition with surface iron for bacterial surface
binding sites (Table 2). With milk-treated steel, however, ferrous ions
in solution increased attachment, presumably as a result of their
interaction with surface-adsorbed protein, either by acting as a
bridging cation between protein and bacterium or by cross-linking the
protein molecules and thus reducing their potential for interaction
with the bacteria. Increased attachment as a result of protein
cross-linking was demonstrated by glutaraldehyde treatment, which for
L. monocytogenes resulted in at least a fourfold increase in
bacterial numbers adhering to milk-treated steel.
The ionic composition of the suspending medium had the most effect when
clean stainless steel was exposed to bacteria, presumably as a result
of the dissolved cations shielding the surface-negative charge on
bacteria and steel. With adsorption of a conditioning layer, bacterial
adhesion was decreased and was less affected by the ionic composition
of the suspension medium, with the exception of iron (discussed above)
and calcium. Since calcium is a component of native milk proteins, its
reintroduction may cause conformational changes in the adsorbed
proteins facilitating attachment.
It has been suggested that surface roughness may play an important role
in the adhesion of microorganisms by protecting from shear forces and
increasing available surface area (5, 6, 14, 31). In the
present study, greater numbers of S. aureus adhered to the
untreated steel with the rougher surface. For L. monocytogenes, little difference between the two surfaces was observed. Scanning electron microscopy micrographs showed that organisms did not orient themselves exclusively along polishing lines
(not shown). This may reflect the fact that our system was static while
the above observations were made in flowing systems in which higher
shear forces may be experienced. Duddridge and Pritchard
(11) suggested that in a static system, a rougher substratum
offers the prospect of a larger surface area available for adsorption.
When adhesion to both rough and smooth milk-treated surfaces was
examined, it was noted that the substratum topography still has an
important effect, because adhesion to a milk-treated rougher surface
was greater than adhesion to a milk-treated smooth surface. This effect
has also been noted by Taylor et al. (29).
The above results demonstrate the important role that preconditioning
layers of adsorbed organics can play in the attachment of
microorganisms to food processing surfaces. In particular, the
observation that layers can inhibit attachment suggests that a
pretreatment with macromolecules possessing the required properties could offer at least a short-term solution to the problem of biofouling in the food industry and its attendant problems.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by studentships from the Ministry for
Agriculture Fisheries and Food (M.F.L. and L.-M.B.).
We also acknowledge the assistance of J. Watts and S. Greaves (School
of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Surrey) with the
XPS work and the staff of the Micro-Structural Studies Unit (University
of Surrey) for their cooperation with CLSM and scanning electron microscopy.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: School of
Biological Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 5XH,
United Kingdom. Phone: 44 1483 259718. Fax: 44 1483 300374. E-mail:
A.Chamberlain{at}surrey.ac.uk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Abbott, A.,
P. R. Rutter, and R. C. W. Berkeley.
1983.
The influence of ionic strength, pH and a protein layer on the interaction between Streptococcus mutans and glass surfaces.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
129:439-445[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Al-Makhlafi, H.,
J. McGuire, and M. Daeschel.
1994.
Influence of preadsorbed milk proteins on adhesion of Listeria monocytogenes to hydrophobic and hydrophilic silica surfaces.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
60:3560-3565[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Al-Makhlafi, H.,
A. Nasir,
J. McGuire, and M. Daeschel.
1995.
Adhesion of Listeria monocytogenes to silica surfaces after sequential and competitive adsorption of bovine serum albumin and -lactoglobulin.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
61:2013-2015[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Austin, J. W., and G. Bergeron.
1995.
Development of bacterial biofilms in dairy processing lines.
J. Dairy Res.
62:509-519[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Baker, J. H.
1984.
Factors affecting the colonisation of various surfaces in a river.
Can. J. Microbiol.
30:511-515.
|
| 6.
|
Beeftink, H. H., and P. Staugaard.
1986.
Structure and dynamics of anaerobic bacterial aggregates in a gas-lift reactor.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
52:1139-1146[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Bryers, J. D.
1994.
Biofilms and the technological implications of microbial cell adhesion.
Colloids Surf.
2:9-23.
|
| 8.
|
Carpentier, B., and O. Cerf.
1993.
Biofilms and their consequences with particular reference to hygiene in the food industry.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
75:499-511[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Chamberlain, A. H. L.
1992.
The role of adsorbed layers in bacterial adhesion, p. 59-67.
In
L. F. Melo, T. R. Bott, M. Fletcher, and B. Capdeville (ed.), Biofilms science and technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
|
| 10.
|
Czechowski, M. H.
1990.
Bacterial attachment to Buna-N gaskets in milk processing equipment.
Aust. J. Dairy Technol.
45:113-114.
|
| 11.
|
Duddridge, J. E., and A. M. Pritchard.
1983.
Microbial corrosion, p. 28-35.
The Metals Society, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 12.
|
Fletcher, M.
1976.
The effects of proteins on bacterial attachment to polystyrene.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
94:400-404[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Frank, J. F., and R. A. Koffi.
1990.
Surface adherent growth of Listeria monocytogenes is associated with increased resistance to surfactant sanitisers and heat.
J. Food Prot.
53:550-554.
|
| 14.
|
Geesey, G. G., and J. W. Costerton.
1979.
Microbiology of a northern river: bacterial distribution and relationship to suspended sediment and organic carbon.
Can. J. Microbiol.
25:1058-1062[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Hamilton, W. C.
1972.
A technique for the characterisation of hydrophilic solid surfaces.
J. Coll. Interface Sci.
40:219-222.
|
| 16.
|
Helke, D. M.,
E. B. Somers, and A. C. L. Wong.
1993.
Attachment of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella typhimurium to stainless steel and Buna-N in the presence of milk and individual milk components.
J. Food Prot.
56:479-484.
|
| 17.
|
Holah, J. T.
1992.
Industrial monitoring: hygiene in food processing, p. 645-659.
In
L. F. Melo, T. R. Bott, M. Fletcher, and B. Capdeville (ed.), Biofilms science and technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
|
| 18.
|
Hood, S. K., and E. A. Zottola.
1995.
Biofilms in food processing.
Food Cont.
6:9-18.
|
| 19.
|
Hood, S. K., and E. A. Zottola.
1997.
Growth media and surface conditioning influence the adherence of Pseudomonas fragi, Salmonella typhimurium, and Listeria monocytogenes cells to stainless steel.
J. Food Prot.
60:1034-1037.
|
| 20.
|
Johal, S.
1988.
Ph.D. thesis. Bacterial adhesion to food processing surfaces in the meat industry.
University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
|
| 21.
|
Krysinski, E. P.,
L. J. Brown, and T. J. Marchisello.
1992.
Effect of cleaners and sanitisers on Listeria monocytogenes attached to product contact surfaces.
J. Food Prot.
55:246-251.
|
| 22.
|
Mafu, A. A.,
D. Roy,
J. Goulet, and P. Magny.
1990.
Attachment of Listeria monocytogenes to stainless steel, glass, polypropylene and rubber surfaces after short contact times.
J. Food Prot.
53:742-746.
|
| 23.
|
Miles, A. A., and S. S. Misra.
1938.
The estimation of the bacteriocidal power of the blood.
J. Hyg.
38:732-748.
|
| 24.
|
Notermans, S.,
J. A. M. A. Dormans, and G. C. Mead.
1991.
Contribution of surface attachment to the establishment of micro-organisms in food processing plants: a review.
Biofouling
5:21-36.
|
| 25.
|
Pontefract, R. D.
1991.
Bacterial adherence: its consequence in food processing.
Can. Inst. Sci. Technol. J.
24:113-117.
|
| 26.
|
Reynolds, E. C., and A. Wong.
1983.
Effect of adsorbed protein on hydroxyapatite zeta potential and Streptococcus mutans adherence.
Infect. Immun.
39:1285-1290[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Speers, J. G. S., and A. Gilmour.
1985.
The influence of milk and milk components on the attachment of bacteria to farm dairy equipment surfaces.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
59:325-332[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Suárez, B.,
C. M. Ferreirós, and M.-T. Criado.
1992.
Adherence of psychrotrophic bacteria to dairy equipment surfaces.
J. Dairy Res.
59:381-388[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Taylor, R. L.,
J. Verran,
G. C. Lees, and A. J. P. Ward.
1998.
The influence of substratum topography on bacterial adhesion to polymethyl methacrylate.
J. Mater. Sci.
9:17-22.
|
| 30.
|
Vaudaux, P. E.,
P. Francois,
R. A. Proctor,
D. McDevitt,
T. J. Foster,
R. M. Albrecht,
D. P. Lew,
H. Wabers, and S. L. Cooper.
1995.
Use of adhesion-defective mutants of Staphylococcus aureus to define the role of specific plasma proteins in promoting bacterial adhesion to canine arteriovenous shunts.
Infect. Immun.
63:585-590[Abstract].
|
| 31.
|
Verran, J., and C. J. Maryan.
1997.
Retention of Candida albicans on acrylic and silicone of different surface topographies.
J. Prosthet. Dent.
77:535-539[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Yang, J.,
J. McGuire, and E. Kolbe.
1991.
Use of the equilibrium contact angle as an index of contact surface cleanliness.
J. Food Prot.
54:879-884.
|
| 33.
|
Zottola, E. A.
1994.
Microbial attachment and biofilm formation: a new problem for the food industry?
Food Technol.
48:107-114.
|
| 34.
|
Zottola, E. A., and K. C. Sasahara.
1994.
Microbial biofilms in the food industry should they be a concern?
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
23:125-148[Medline].
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 1999, p. 4543-4548, Vol. 65, No. 10
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Vejborg, R. M., Klemm, P.
(2008). Blocking of Bacterial Biofilm Formation by a Fish Protein Coating. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 3551-3558
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gollwitzer, H., Ibrahim, K., Meyer, H., Mittelmeier, W., Busch, R., Stemberger, A.
(2003). Antibacterial poly(D,L-lactic acid) coating of medical implants using a biodegradable drug delivery technology. J Antimicrob Chemother
51: 585-591
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bagge, D., Hjelm, M., Johansen, C., Huber, I., Gram, L.
(2001). Shewanella putrefaciens Adhesion and Biofilm Formation on Food Processing Surfaces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
67: 2319-2325
[Abstract]
[Full Text]