Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 1999, p. 4601-4605, Vol. 65, No. 10
Department of
Biochemistry1 and Biophysics
Program,3 The Ohio State University, Columbus,
Ohio 43210, and Northeastern Experiment Station, USDA Forest
Service, Delaware, Ohio 430152
Received 1 February 1999/Accepted 18 June 1999
Cleavage of the Cry2Aa1 protoxin (molecular mass, 63 kDa) from
Bacillus thuringiensis by midgut juice of gypsy moth
(Lymantria dispar) larvae resulted in two major protein
fragments: a 58-kDa fragment which was highly toxic to the insect and a
49-kDa fragment which was not toxic. In the midgut juice, the protoxin
was processed into a 58-kDa toxin within 1 min, but after digestion for
1 h, the 58-kDa fragment was further cleaved within domain I,
resulting in the protease-resistant 49-kDa fragment. Both the 58-kDa
and nontoxic 49-kDa fragments were also found in vivo when
125I-labeled toxin was fed to the insects. N-terminal
sequencing revealed that the protease cleavage sites are at the C
termini of Tyr49 and Leu144 for the active fragment and the smaller
fragment, respectively. To prevent the production of the nontoxic
fragment during midgut processing, five mutant proteins were
constructed by replacing Leu144 of the toxin with Asp (L144D), Ala
(L144A), Gly (L144G), His (L144H), or Val (L144V) by using a pair of
complementary mutagenic oligonucleotides in PCR. All of the mutant
proteins were highly resistant to the midgut proteases and
chymotrypsin. Digestion of the mutant proteins by insect midgut extract
and chymotrypsin produced only the active 58-kDa fragment, except that
L144H was partially cleaved at residue 144.
During sporulation, Bacillus
thuringiensis, a group of gram-positive bacteria, produces
crystalline (Cry) proteins which are toxic against a range of insect
groups. Recently, over 120 cry genes have been reported and
a new nomenclature system classifying Cry proteins based on the amino
acid homology of the proteins has been proposed (5). The
mechanism of action of most Cry proteins consists of three major steps:
solubilization and activation of protoxin in the insect midgut
(34), binding of the activated fragment to midgut receptor
(2, 13), and insertion of the toxin into the midgut apical
membrane, which causes destruction of membrane potential (9,
12).
The molecular sizes of most Cry proteins are around 130 to 140 kDa
(14). After digestion by trypsin-like enzymes in the midgut
(23, 34), the active fragment is produced. In general, the
protease-resistant core protein is in the range of 60 to 70 kDa
(1, 14), covering three domains of the active toxin
(10, 19). Deletion of the cry genes beyond the
active sequences completely abolished the toxic activity of the gene
products (33, 35).
Proteolytic processing of Cry protein by midgut proteases is reported
to generate active toxins of varying potency and specificity (11). However, digestion of Cry1A by diamondback moth
(Plutella xylostella) midgut extract generated a core that
lacks Cry2Aa1, a 633-amino-acid toxin with molecular mass of 63 kDa, was
originally described by Yamamoto as a dipteran- and lepidopteran-active protein (6, 36, 37). Even though the sequence of this Cry protein shows rather limited homology to those of the other Cry proteins, its structure has recently been determined and observed to be
similar to those of Cry1Aa and Cry3A, consisting of three distinct
domains (24). English et al. (7) reported the
distinct binding and ion channels formed by Cry2Aa1 in
Helicoverpa zea, indicating a mode of action unique among
the Cry proteins.
Here, we report that Cry2Aa1 is rapidly cleaved at a single position in
domain I by midgut enzymes of gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar).
The cleavage product is not toxic to the insect. Several mutant
proteins were constructed by removing the amino acid targeted by the
proteases. All of these mutants were able to release the active
fragment, which is more resistant to protease digestion than the
wild-type toxin.
All enzymes and reagents were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim
Biochemicals (BMB) unless otherwise stated.
Bacterial strains and plasmids.
Escherichia coli BL21
and plasmids pDL103 (20) and pOS4201 (8), which
carry the cry2Aa1 and cry1Aa1 genes,
respectively, were obtained from our laboratory stocks and from the
Bacillus Genetic Stock Center, The Ohio State University.
Gut juice preparation.
Fourth-instar larvae of L. dispar were dissected, and the midguts were recovered. The midguts
were centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 30 min, and the
supernatant was collected and used as the midgut extract.
Protein purification.
E. coli harboring the
cry2Aa1 gene was cultured in Luria-Bertani broth containing
100 µg of ampicillin per ml at 37°C for 72 h. Inclusion bodies
were purified from the bacteria as previously described
(20). The bacterial cells from a 500-ml culture were resuspended in 100 ml of lysis buffer (15% sucrose, 50 mM EDTA, 50 mM
Tris [pH 8.0]) containing 10 µg of lysozyme per ml at 37°C for
2 h, followed by sonication and washing three times in 100 ml of
2% Triton X-100-0.5 M NaCl, five times in 100 ml of 0.5 M NaCl, and
three times in distilled water. The crystal protein was solubilized in
100 mM Na3PO4, pH 12, at 37°C for 1 h.
The soluble protein samples were then dialyzed in 50 mM
Na2CO3, pH 10.5. Protein concentration was
determined by the bicinchoninic acid (Pierce) method with a gel
densitometer (Kodak Digital Science Electrophoresis Documentation and
Analysis System).
Protein digestion.
Midgut extract digestion reaction was
performed at room temperature as indicated. The reaction was stopped by
the addition of Complete (a protease inhibitor [final concentration,
1×]; BMB), 2 µM E-64 (a papain inhibitor), and 0.4 N NaOH. Sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-loading buffer was added, and the samples were
boiled. The protein samples were neutralized with equal molar
concentrations of HCl and then separated by SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (15). Chymotrypsin digestion was
performed by using a mass of the enzyme that was 20% that of the
protein. The reaction was stopped by adding Complete (Roche; final
concentration, 1×) and boiling the samples in SDS-loading buffer. The
molecular masses of the digested products were determined by Kodak
Digital Science 1D Image Analysis Software.
Autoradiography and in vivo cleavage of Cry2Aa1.
The
protoxin of Cry2Aa1 was iodinated with IODO-BEAD (Pierce) as previously
described (18). Twenty-five micrograms of the toxin was
iodinated with 1 mCi of [125I]NaI. Each overnight-starved
fourth-instar larva of gypsy moth was fed a diet contaminated with 1 µg of 125I-labeled protein per cm2. After
feeding for 1 h, the insect was longitudinally dissected. The
peritrophic membrane and contents were gently removed from the midgut
membrane. The midgut tissue was washed in 50 ml of binding buffer (150 mM NaCl, 8 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM
KH2PO4 [pH 7.4]) for 10 min twice. The
peritrophic membrane, with its contents, and the midgut were separately
placed on a piece of Whatman filter paper and then vacuum dried before
being subjected to autoradiography for 48 h. To determine the
midgut-processed fragments in vivo, another group of the insects were
separately treated with 125I-labeled toxin as described
above. After dissecting, the midgut contents in the peritrophic
membrane were centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 30 min.
The supernatant was diluted with distilled water (1:10) before
Complete, E-64, and NaOH were added as described above. After boiling
in SDS-loading buffer, the protein samples were neutralized with HCl
and analyzed by gel electrophoresis. The bound toxin on the midgut
tissue was extracted by boiling the whole gut tissue in 200 µl of a
solution containing 1× Complete, 2 µM E-64, and 1× SDS-loading
buffer. The samples were centrifuged at 15,000 × g for
15 min, and the supernatant was analyzed by gel electrophoresis. The
gel was vacuum dried and autoradiographed for 48 h.
Site-directed mutagenesis.
Double-primer site-directed
mutagenesis was performed by using double-stranded pDL103 as a template
DNA. The method was a modification of the QuikChange
site-directed mutagenesis method (Stratagene). Two complementary
oligonucleotides were used as the mutagenic primers,
5'-CAAAACCCTGTTCCTCACTCAATAACTTCTTCG-3' to
replace Leu144 by His and
5'-CGAAGAAGTTATTGAGNCAGGAACAGGGTTTTG-3' to
replace Leu144 by Ala, Asp, Gly, and Val (the underlined portions indicate the codons that were altered). The mutagenic double-stranded DNA was amplified by PCR (25). Pwo was used as a
DNA polymerase enzyme in the reaction. The temperatures and times for
annealing, extension, and denaturing were 48°C for 1 min, 68°C for
10 min, and 95°C for 30 s, respectively. The reactions were
performed for 15 cycles. PCR products were treated with DpnI
for 1 h to digest methylated parental DNA template before
transforming E. coli BL21.
N-terminal sequencing of the protein fragments.
The protein
samples from the midgut juice digestion reaction were separated on an
SDS-10% PAGE gel and then transferred by electrophoresis to an
Immobilon-P polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Bio-Rad). The peptide
fragments were analyzed by Edman degradation with an Applied Biosystems
model 477A pulsed liquid-sequencer equipped with an on-line
high-performance liquid chromatograph for PTH amino acid analysis at
the USDA Forest Service facility (Delaware, Ohio).
Bioassays.
Gypsy moth diet (F9631B; Bioserv) was used in all
experiments. The protein samples were treated as indicated in Results,
and the digestion products were examined by SDS-PAGE just prior to bioassay experiments. The 58-kDa fragment was prepared by digestion of
the protoxin in the diluted (1:50 [vol/vol]) gut extract for 10 min,
and the reaction was stopped by adding Complete and was stored at
4°C. The 49-kDa fragment was prepared by the same procedure, except
that digestion was for 16 h. The proteins were added to the
surface of the diet in Multiwell-24 plates. The 50% lethal concentration (LC50) was determined after 5 days of
intoxication of the insect neonates. The 50% growth inhibition dose
(ID50) was determined by using second-instar larvae. The
weight of each larva was measured before transfer to the
toxin-contaminated diet and 5 days after intoxication. The growth
inhibition effect was considered positive when the larvae failed to
gain weight. The data was analyzed by the Probit method
(32).
Digestion of Cry proteins by midgut extract.
Proteolysis of Cry proteins after adding loading buffer has been
reported by Choma and Kaplan (4). At high concentrations of
L. dispar gut extract (greater than 1:10 [vol/vol]), we
also observed degradation of the protein after adding protein-loading buffer. The degradation might be from the digestion of SDS-induced denatured toxin proteins by SDS-resistant proteases in the insect midgut juice. Therefore, both protein inhibitors and NaOH were added
before mixing the protein samples with protein-loading buffer.
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Production of Chymotrypsin-Resistant Bacillus
thuringiensis Cry2Aa1
-Endotoxin by Protein
Engineering
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-helix 1 in domain I of Cry1A (27). Similarly,
digestion of Cry3A with chymotrypsin caused a nick at the region
between
-helix 3 and
-helix 4 of domain I (3). The
protease cleavage inside domain I was also found in Cry9Ca1, and
more-stable protein was produced after removal of the trypsin-cleaved
residue (16).
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

View larger version (96K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the
products of Cry2Aa1 and Cry1Aa1 processed by gypsy moth larval midgut
extract at different periods of incubation. The protein solutions were
mixed with the gut extract at a ratio of 10:1 (vol/vol) and incubated
at room temperature. The reactions were stopped by adding protease
inhibitors, as described in Methods and Materials. Lanes: 1, molecular
size markers (phosphorylase b, 97 kDa; bovine serum albumin, 66 kDa;
aldolase, 39 kDa; triosephosphate isomerase, 26 kDa); 2, Cry2Aa1
protoxin; 3, Cry2Aa1 digested for 1 min; 4, Cry2Aa1 digested for 1 h; 5, Cry1Aa1 protoxin; 6, Cry1Aa1 digested for 1 h; 7, Cry1Aa1
digested for 16 h. The arrowhead indicates a trace amount of the
58-kDa fragment.
TABLE 1.
Toxicity against L. dispar larvae of Cry2Aa1
protoxin and protein fragments from the processing of larval
midgut extract
Cleavage of Cry2Aa1 in vivo. To investigate whether the 58-kDa and 49-kDa fragments were produced in vivo, 125I-labeled Cry2Aa1 was applied to the diet. After the larvae fed on toxin-contaminated diet for 1 h, we found diffusion of the toxin throughout the food tract (Fig. 2A, image 1), and the toxin was also found on the midgut membrane (Fig. 2A, image 2). More bound toxin was detected in the anterior and the middle regions of the midgut. After intoxication for 16 h, the toxin was equally detected on all midgut regions (results not shown). The 49-kDa fragment was found in the midgut fluid (Fig. 2B, lane 2), while the 58-kDa fragment and small amounts of 49-kDa fragment were found on the midgut membrane (Fig. 2B, lane 3).
|
Toxicity of the digested Cry2Aa1 to L. dispar larvae. The LC50 of Cry2Aa1 protoxin against the insect neonate larvae was 5.6 ng/cm2, and similarly, the LC50 of the 58-kDa fragment was 4.7 ng/cm2 (Table 1). The toxicities of these two proteins were not significantly different. The results were confirmed by measuring the ID50s for second-instar larvae. The ID50s of the protoxin and the 58-kDa fragment were 26.9 and 30.4 ng/cm2, respectively. In contrast to the protoxin and the 58-kDa fragment, the 49-kDa fragment was not toxic to the insect in treatment concentrations of up to 5,000 ng/cm2. This 49-kDa fragment was insoluble and found in the precipitation form (results not shown). It was easily separated from solution by centrifugation. However, we still found a trace amount of 58-kDa protein coprecipitated with this fragment (Fig. 1, lane 4). This contaminating active fragment might be the protein that caused growth inhibition and lethality when a higher concentration of the 49-kDa fragment was applied to the insects.
Mutagenesis.
Site-direct mutagenesis was used to replace
Leu144 of Cry2Aa1 with different amino acids. The reverse primer was
designed to have His at this position because we expected that the
residue in this position might have the same properties as His161 in
the loop between
3 and
4 of Cry3A. The "spin" codon designed
in the forward primer allowed other small amino acids, Ala, Asp, Gly,
and Val, to replace Leu144 so that the stability and toxicity of the
new mutant proteins could be studied. With these two oligonucleotides, five mutant proteins, Leu144Asp (L144D), Leu144Ala (L144A),
Leu144Gly (L144G), Leu144His (L144H), and Leu144Val (L144V), were
produced. All mutations yielded highly expressed protoxins, and these
proteins were more stable than the wild-type protoxin (Fig.
3).
|
Protease resistance of the mutant proteins. Digestion of the L144D, L144V, L144A, and L144G protoxins with a 10:1 dilution (vol/vol) of protein solution and gut juice produced only a 58-kDa fragment. Stability of these mutants was also found with gut juice digestion for 16 h (results not shown). Digestion of L144H yielded two protein fragments, 58 kDa and 49 kDa, respectively (Fig. 3A, lane 7). The remaining 58-kDa fragment indicates a higher degree of protease resistance in the L144H protein. Digestion of these proteins with chymotrypsin produced the same results as midgut extract digestion (Fig. 3B).
Toxicity of the mutant proteins.
Results from a bioassay of
the mutant proteins treated with the midgut extract and chymotrypsin
against second-instar larvae of gypsy moth are shown in Table
2. Even though all mutant proteins were
more resistant to protease cleavage, compared to the wild-type protein,
they did not show higher toxicity. We tested the toxicity of the
protoxin and confirmed the data by treating the proteins with either
gut extract or chymotrypsin before applying them to the insect diets.
The LC50s of all the mutant proteins were the same as that
of the wild type, between 2.8 and 8.8 ng/cm2.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is commonly believed that the products from the proteolytic cleavage of the Cry protoxins in the insect larval gut are the active fragments that play the major roles in binding to the receptors on the midgut columnar epithelial cells (13, 18, 30, 31) and irreversible insertion into the cell membrane, which destroys the electric potential on the apical midgut membrane (9, 12). Furthermore, the proteolytic activation of the protoxins was also reported as an important factor for the mechanism of resistance of the insects to B. thuringiensis toxins (28). Since it was observed that the intact Cry3A and chymotrypsin-treated protein exhibited different affinity binding (22), it is important to investigate which portion of the polypeptides from the proteolytic process plays a role in toxicity.
Structural analysis of the trypsinized Cry1Aa and Cry3A revealed three
domains in both Cry proteins of which seven helices are the main
secondary structure in domain I, and
-sheets and loops are the main
secondary structures in both domain II and domain III (10,
19). This led to the hypothesis that all Cry proteins may exhibit
three-domain structures (10). The protease-resistant core
polypeptide starts at Ile29 of Cry1Aa, Cry1Ab, and Cry1Ac and at Asp58
of Cry3A. Both residues are located just before
1 on domain I. Further removal of codons from the N terminus of the peptide leads to
the loss of toxicity of the proteins (33).
The three-dimensional structure of Cry2Aa1 has been determined
(24). Compared to the structures of Cry1Aa and Cry3A, there is one more
-helix in domain I of Cry2Aa1, designated
0, based on
the nomenclature of Cry3A structure given by Li et al. (19). Tyr49 is on the loop between
0 and
1. Removal of
0 from the mutant protoxin by midgut protease or chymotrypsin generates the protease-resistant core that is comparable to the trypsinized Cry3A and
Cry1Aa that starts from
1. Another cleavage site in Cry2Aa1 is
Leu144 that is on the loop before
4. The cleavage after Leu144 was
expected as an activity of chymotrypsin-like proteases in the insect
gut extract. This cleavage was found during digestion of Cry2Aa1 with
chymotrypsin (Fig. 3B, lane 3). Unlike Nicolls et al. (26),
who reported the N-terminal sequences of these protease-resistant cores
using limited proteolysis by chymotrypsin, we prepared the protein
fragments by using insect midgut extract. The obtained sequences were
the same for both digestions, indicating the prevalence of the enzyme
in the insect midgut.
Carroll et al. (3) reported that cabbage white butterfly
(Pieris brassicae) gut extract and chymotrypsin cleaved
Cry3A at the N termini of Arg158 and His161, respectively. These
residues are aligned around the loop region between
3 and
4.
However, because the small component is still associated with the major component, the nicked toxin is soluble and as active as the protoxin. Different results were found in experiments with Cry9Ca1
(16). Cry9Ca1 contains a protease cleavage site at Arg164,
but trypsinization of this protein generated a nontoxic 55-kDa fragment
without the small additional N-terminal fragment. In contrast to Cry3A
and Cry9Ca1, Cry2Aa1 cleaved by gut protease or by chymotrypsin at the
carboxyl terminus of Leu144 tended to form precipitation. We digested
Cry2Aa1 in different buffers with pH values ranging from 7 to 12, but
the precipitation was still found. The insoluble form might be an
aggregation of Cry2Aa1 pieces created when domain I loses helices
0
to
3. SDS-PAGE analysis of the precipitate showed that almost all of
it was the nontoxic 49-kDa fragment, contaminated by a trace amount of
the 58-kDa fragment (Fig. 1, lane 4).
More evidence that the 58-kDa peptide is the active fragment against L. dispar is the absence of the 49-kDa fragment from proteolytic processing of our mutant proteins. Leu144 was replaced so that the cleavage site was eliminated. These proteins were highly resistant to both chymotrypsin and gut juice digestion (Fig. 3). They were stable even in digestion by midgut juice for 16 h (results not shown). Initially, we expected that these more resistant proteins might show higher toxicity against L. dispar. But the results from Table 2 indicate that their toxicities were not significantly different from that of the wild-type protein.
Taking together the change in protease resistance of the mutants compared to that of the wild-type toxin and a degree of toxicity similar among all of these protoxins, we propose that the process of solubilization, proteolytic processing, and binding (or insertion) of Cry2Aa1 must happen more rapidly in vivo than in vitro. We further propose that the cleavage to produce the 58-kDa toxin in vivo occurs more rapidly than that which produces the 49-kDa protein. The evidence for this is obvious as more amounts of the 58-kDa fragment were found on the midgut membrane (Fig. 2B, lane 3), indicating that this fragment is bound to the midgut membrane and protected by the membrane components before being cleaved at Leu144. Another possible mechanism is that binding of the 55-kDa fragment to the receptor renders a conformational change in such a way that the second cleavage site, Leu144, is away from the active site of the proteases.
The rapid toxicity of Cry2Aa1 against H. zea larvae was previously observed by English et al. (7), who reported that Cry2Aa1-fed larvae of this insect stopped feeding about 1 min after intoxication and showed morbidity within 4 min. Experiments performed with the other Cry proteins also showed that the apical cell membrane electrical potential response was detected within a few minutes after adding the toxins (21, 29). The results from our experiments also imply that the toxin binds and inserts very rapidly in the insect midgut membrane before proteolytic cleavage by chymotrypsin-like protease of the midgut enzymes.
In vivo and in vitro cleavage at Leu144 of Cry2Aa1 might produce
different forms of the processed fragments. Digestion at Leu144 in the
midgut environment, which is more viscous and contains many more
biochemical carriers, might only create a nick on the protein molecule,
leaving the active fragment. The nick fragment of wild-type Cry2Aa1 is
as toxic as the 58-kDa fragment produced by the mutants. This might
explain why both mutant proteins and wild-type Cry2Aa1 showed the same
degree of toxicity. On the other hand, nicking at Leu144 during in
vitro digestion might cause dissociation of
1 to
3 helices from
the rest of the protein molecule.
Making chymotrypsin-resistant Cry proteins by site-directed mutagenesis is an alternative method that can facilitate the production of the active fragment that is used in an investigation of the mode of action of these toxins. In addition, this strategy can be used in production of more stable proteins. Protease cleavage generating an inactive protein is one of those limitations. Furthermore, we expect this technique to be used to stabilize other labile Cry proteins like Cry20Aa1, which loses its mosquitocidal activity due to degradation (17).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Gary Bernon (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service [APHIS], USDA, OTIS ANGB, MA) for kindly supplying L. dispar eggs.
This work was supported by a National Institutes of Health grant to D.H.D. (RØ1AI29Ø92).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, 484 West 12th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210-1292. Phone: (614) 292-8829. Fax: (614) 292-6773. E-mail: dean.10{at}osu.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Aronson, A. I.,
W. Beckman, and P. Dunn.
1986.
Bacillus thuringiensis and related insect pathogens.
Microbiol. Rev.
50:1-24 |
| 2. | Bravo, A., K. Hendrickx, S. Jensens, and M. Peferoen. 1992. Immunocytochemical analysis of specific binding of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crystal proteins to lepidopteran and coleopteran midgut membranes. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 60:247-253. |
| 3. |
Carroll, J.,
D. Convents,
J. Van Damme,
A. Boets,
J. Van Rie, and D. J. Ellar.
1997.
Intramolecular proteolytic cleavage of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3A -endotoxin may facilitate its coleopteran toxicity.
J. Invertebr. Pathol.
70:41-49[Medline].
|
| 4. | Choma, C. T., and H. Kaplan. 1990. Folding and unfolding of the protoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis: evidence that the toxic moiety is present in an active conformation. Biochemistry 29:10971-10977[Medline]. |
| 5. |
Crickmore, N.,
D. R. Zeigler,
J. Feitelson,
E. Schnepf,
J. Van Rie,
D. Lereclus,
J. Baum, and D. H. Dean.
1998.
Revision of the nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal crystal proteins.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62:807-813 |
| 6. |
Donovan, W. P.,
C. C. Dankocsik,
M. P. Gilbert,
W. C. Gawron-Burke,
R. R. Groat, and B. C. Carton.
1988.
Amino acid sequence and entomocidal activity of the P2 crystal protein. An insect toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki.
J. Biol. Chem.
263:561-567 |
| 7. | English, L., H. L. Robbins, M. A. Von Tersch, C. A. Kulesza, D. Ave, D. Coyle, C. S. Jany, and S. L. Slatin. 1994. Mode of action of CryIIA: a Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 24:1025-1035. |
| 8. |
Ge, A. Z.,
N. I. Shivarova, and D. H. Dean.
1989.
Location of the Bombyx mori specificity domain on a Bacillus thuringiensis -endotoxin protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:4037-4041 |
| 9. |
Giordana, B.,
M. Tasca,
M. Villa,
C. Chiantore,
G. M. Hanozet, and P. Parenti.
1993.
Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. aizawai -endotoxin inhibits the K+/amino acid cotransporters of lepidopteran larval midgut.
Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C
106:403-407.
|
| 10. | Grochulski, P., L. Masson, S. Borisova, M. Pusztai-Carey, J.-L. Schwartz, R. Brousseau, and M. Cygler. 1995. Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA(a) insecticidal toxin: crystal structure and channel formation. J. Mol. Biol. 254:447-464[Medline]. |
| 11. |
Haider, M. Z.,
B. H. Knowles, and D. J. Ellar.
1986.
Specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis var. colmeri insecticidal -endotoxin determined by differential proteolytic processing of the protoxin by larval gut proteases.
Eur. J. Biochem.
156:531-540[Medline].
|
| 12. |
Harvey, W. R., and M. G. Wolfersberger.
1979.
Mechanism of inhibition of active potassium transport in isolated midgut of Manduca sexta by Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin.
J. Exp. Biol.
83:293-304 |
| 13. |
Hofmann, C.,
H. Vanderberggen,
H. Höfte,
J. Van Rie,
S. Jansens, and H. Van Mellaert.
1988.
Specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis -endotoxin is correlated with the presence of high-affinity binding sites in the brush border membrane of target insect midguts.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:7844-7848 |
| 14. |
Höfte, H., and H. R. Whiteley.
1989.
Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis.
Microbiol. Rev.
53:242-255 |
| 15. | Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680-685[Medline]. |
| 16. | Lambert, B., L. Buysse, C. Decock, S. Jansens, C. Piens, B. Saey, J. Seurinck, K. Van Audenhove, J. Van Rie, A. Van Vliet, and M. Peferoen. 1996. A Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crystal protein with a high activity against members of the family Noctuidae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:80-86[Abstract]. |
| 17. | Lee, H.-K., and S. S. Gill. 1997. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel mosquitocidal protein gene from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. fukuokaensis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:4664-4670[Abstract]. |
| 18. |
Lee, M. K.,
R. E. Milne,
A. Z. Ge, and D. H. Dean.
1992.
Location of Bombyx mori receptor binding on a Bacillus thuringiensis -endotoxin.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:3115-3121 |
| 19. |
Li, J.,
J. Carroll, and D. J. Ellar.
1991.
Crystal structures of insecticidal -endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis at 2.5 Å resolution.
Nature
353:815-821[Medline].
|
| 20. | Liang, Y., and D. H. Dean. 1994. Location of a lepidopteran specificity region in insecticidal crystal protein CryIIA from Bacillus thuringiensis. Mol. Microbiol. 13:569-575[Medline]. |
| 21. | Liebig, B., D. L. Stetson, and D. H. Dean. 1995. Quantification of the effect of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins on short-circuit current in the midgut of Bombyx mori. J. Insect. Physiol. 41:17-22. |
| 22. | Martínez-Ramírez, A. C., and M. D. Real. 1996. Proteolytic processing of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIIIA toxin and specific binding to brush-border membrane vesicles of Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Colorado potato beetle). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 54:115-122. |
| 23. | Milne, R., and H. Kaplan. 1993. Purification and characterization of trypsin-like digestive enzyme from spruce budworm Choristoneura fumiferana responsible for the activation of delta endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 23:663-673[Medline]. |
| 24. | Morse, R. J., G. Powell, V. Ramalingam, M. Audtho,
D. H. Dean, T. Yamamoto, and R. M. Stroud. Unexpected
binding epitope and specificity determinants of insecticidal
-endotoxins revealed by structure of the Cry2Aa protoxin. Submitted
for publication.
|
| 25. | Mullis, K. B., and F. A. Faloona. 1987. Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. Methods Enzymol. 155:335-350[Medline]. |
| 26. |
Nicolls, C. N.,
W. Ahmad, and D. J. Ellar.
1989.
Evidence for two different types of insecticidal P2 toxins with dual specificity in Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies.
J. Bacteriol.
171:5141-5147 |
| 27. |
Ogiwara, K.,
L. S. Indrasith,
S. Asano, and H. Hori.
1992.
Processing of -endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki HD-1 and HD-73 by gut juices of various insect larvae.
J. Invertebr. Pathol.
60:121-126[Medline].
|
| 28. | Oppert, B., K. J. Kramer, R. W. Beeman, D. Johnson, and W. H. McGaughey. 1997. Proteinase-mediated insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. J. Biol. Biochem. 272:23473-23476. |
| 29. | Peyronnet, O., V. Vachon, R. Brousseau, D. Baines, J.-L. Schwartz, and R. Laprade. 1997. Effect of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins on the membrane potential of lepidopteran insect midgut cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:1679-1684[Abstract]. |
| 30. |
Rajamohan, F.,
O. Alzate,
J. A. Cotrill,
A. Curtiss, and D. H. Dean.
1996.
Protein engineering of Bacillus thuringiensis -endotoxin: mutations at domain II of CryIAb enhance receptor affinity and toxicity toward gypsy moth larvae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:14338-14343 |
| 31. |
Rajamohan, F.,
S. R. A. Hussain,
J. A. Cotrill,
F. Gould, and D. H. Dean.
1996.
Mutations at domain II, loop 3, of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIAa and CryIAb delta-endotoxins suggest loop 3 is involved in initial binding to lepidopteran midguts.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:25220-25226 |
| 32. | Raymond, M. 1985. Présentation d'un programme d'analyse log probit pour micro-ordinateur. Cah. ORSTOM Ser. Entomol. Med. Parasitol. 22:117-121. |
| 33. |
Schnepf, H. E., and H. R. Whiteley.
1985.
Delineation of a toxin-encoding segment of a Bacillus thuringiensis crystal protein gene.
J. Biol. Chem.
260:6273-6280 |
| 34. |
Tojo, A., and K. Aizawa.
1983.
Dissolution and degradation of Bacillus thuringiensis -endotoxin by gut juice protease of the silkworm Bombyx mori.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
45:576-580 |
| 35. | Wabiko, H., K. C. Raymond, and L. A. Bulla, Jr. 1986. Bacillus thuringiensis entomocidal protoxin gene sequence and gene product analysis. DNA 5:305-314[Medline]. |
| 36. | Yamamoto, T., and R. E. McLaughlin. 1981. Isolation of a protein from the parasporal crystal of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki toxic to mosquito larva, Aedes taeniorhynchus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 103:414-421[Medline]. |
| 37. | Yamamoto, T. 1983. Identification of entomocidal toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis by high performance liquid chromatography. J. Gen. Microbiol. 129:2595-2603. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»