Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 1999, p. 4855-4862, Vol. 65, No. 11
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Phylogenetic Differentiation of Two Closely Related
Nitrosomonas spp. That Inhabit Different Sediment
Environments in an Oligotrophic Freshwater Lake
Corinne B.
Whitby,1
Jon R.
Saunders,1
Juana
Rodriguez,1
Roger W.
Pickup,2 and
Alan
McCarthy1,*
School of Biological Sciences, University of
Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB,1 and
Institute of Freshwater Ecology, Far Sawrey, Cumbria, LA22
OLP,2 United Kingdom
Received 23 June 1999/Accepted 23 August 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The population of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in a temperate
oligotrophic freshwater lake was analyzed by recovering 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) from lakewater and sediment samples taken throughout a
seasonal cycle. Nitrosospira and Nitrosomonas
16S rRNA genes were amplified in a nested PCR, and the identity of the
products was confirmed by oligonucleotide hybridization.
Nitrosospira DNA was readily identified in all samples, and
nitrosomonad DNA of the Nitrosomonas europaea-Nitrosomonas
eutropha lineage was also directly detected, but during the
summer months only. Phylogenetic delineation with partial (345 bp) 16S
rRNA gene sequences of clones obtained from sediments confirmed the
fidelity of the amplified nitrosomonad DNA and identified two sequence
clusters closely related to either N. europaea or N. eutropha that were equated with the littoral and profundal
sediment sites, respectively. Determination of 701-bp sequences for 16S
rDNA clones representing each cluster confirmed this delineation. A
PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) system was
developed that enabled identification of clones containing N. europaea and N. eutropha 16S rDNA sequences, including subclasses therein. It proved possible to analyze 16S rDNA
amplified directly from sediment samples to determine the relative
abundance of each species compared with that of the other. N. europaea and N. eutropha are very closely related,
and direct evidence for their presence in lake systems is limited. The
correlation of each species with a distinct spatial location in
sediment is an unusual example of niche adaptation by two genotypically
similar bacteria. Their occurrence and relative distribution can now be routinely monitored in relation to environmental variation by the
application of PCR-RFLP analysis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing
bacteria are largely responsible for the oxidation of ammonia to
nitrite and are important in the global cycling of nitrogen in
terrestrial, aquatic, and marine ecosystems (8, 29).
Difficulties in isolating and cultivating these slow-growing
chemoautotrophs have encouraged the application of molecular biological
methods to the study of their ecology. The existence of two
phylogenetic groups, the nitrosospiras and nitrosomonads, within the
-subdivision of the class Proteobacteria was revealed by
16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequencing (11), and further
studies have considerably expanded the sequence database (15, 28,
37, 41, 42). Although most information on the physiology and
biochemistry of ammonia oxidation has been obtained from experiments
with the nitrosomonad Nitrosomonas europaea, studies of the
molecular ecology of ammonia oxidizers have commonly recovered
nitrosospira 16S rDNA sequences from natural environments (12, 37,
39). N. europaea and its close relative,
Nitrosomonas eutropha, comprise a lineage described as
Nitrosomonas "cluster 7" (15, 35, 37), that
has been associated with enrichment cultures (17, 46),
fertilized soils (9), and sewage treatment systems (13,
20, 44). More recently, sequence information on the functional
ammonia monooxygenase gene (amo) has provided an alternative
target for molecular ecological studies of both nitrosospiras and
nitrosomonads (19, 23, 30, 34, 39).
Temperate freshwater lakes undergo stratification in summer to the
extent that populations of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria become concentrated at the oxythermocline, where oxygen and ammonia gradients combine to produce conditions favorable for their proliferation (8). There is some evidence that differential ammonia
concentrations in activated sludge, lakewater, and sediments have
driven the adaptive evolution of different subpopulations (9, 10,
36, 40). Whether lakes of different nutrient statuses (i.e.,
hypereutrophic, eutrophic, and oligotrophic) also show differences in
ammonia oxidizer community structure that can be equated with
environmental variation is also worthy of investigation. Hastings et
al. (10) studied the relative distribution of nitrosospiras
and nitrosomonads in the water column and sediment of a eutrophic lake
as it progressed through a seasonal stratification cycle. They
confirmed the ubiquity of nitrosospiras and the failure to obtain
direct 16S rDNA evidence for nitrosomonads without enrichment. It has
been suggested that this is due to the targeting of the N. europaea-N. eutropha cluster 7 lineage rather than sequences from
other nitrosomonads, such as Nitrosomonas ureae in
Nitrosomonas cluster 6 (15, 35, 37), that are
more relevant to the freshwater environment (28, 35). Ward
et al. (46) used a range of 16S rDNA primers to study the phylogenetic diversity of ammonia oxidizers in lake samples and found
variation in species composition with depth and between different
aquatic environments. More recently, Phillips et al. (27)
provided evidence for segregation at the genus level between two
distinct environmental niches in seawater. In this paper, we describe
the direct recovery of ammonia oxidizer 16S rDNA from sites within an
oligotrophic lake environment throughout a seasonal cycle. Evidence for
the presence of nitrosomonads of the N. europaea-N. eutropha
lineage is presented, and we attempt to relate genotypic population
composition to site location on the basis of both sequence and
restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) information.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains.
The ammonia-oxidizing bacteria cultures
used in this study were those maintained in the culture collection of
the School of Biological Sciences; the origins and accession numbers of
the strains are given by Head et al. (11). Cultures were
maintained in the medium described by Watson and Mandel
(47). Nucleic acids were extracted from these cultures as
described previously (11) and were used as controls for the
specificity of 16S rDNA PCR primers and oligonucleotide probes throughout.
Environmental sampling.
Sediment cores and lakewater samples
were collected periodically throughout the year 1996 to 1997 from
Buttermere, an oligotrophic freshwater lake in the English Lake
District, Cumbria, United Kingdom. Both profundal (25-m depth) and
littoral (10-m depth) sediments were sampled by using a modified Jenkin
corer as described by Ohnstadt and Jones (24). Lake
temperature and oxygen profiles were measured with a combined oxygen
electrode and thermistor (model 57; Yellow Springs Instruments, Yellow
Springs, Ohio). Lakewater (60 liters) taken at the oxycline (14-m
depth) was concentrated to 1 liter by using a Pellicon tangential flow
filtration apparatus (Millipore) equipped with three
0.45-µm-pore-size Durapore cassettes (5 ft2 per filter).
Extraction and PCR amplification of DNA from environmental
samples.
For DNA isolation, the protocol of Bruce et al.
(2) was applied to sediments, and the protocol of Schmidt et
al. (33) was used for lakewater. The sequences of the PCR
amplification primers and oligonucleotide probe (AAO258) are detailed
by Hiorns et al. (12). A 100-µl reaction mixture was
prepared that contained the following: 100 mM deoxynucleotide mix
(Pharmacia Biotech), 80 µl of sterile Hypersolv water (BDH), 10 pM
each forward and reverse primer, 10 µl of 10× buffer, template DNA
equivalent to 4 to 10 ng of environmental DNA (or 1 ng of control pure
culture DNA), and 2 U of Super Taq polymerase (HT
Biotechnologies). The reaction mixture was overlaid with 2 to 3 drops
of sterile mineral oil. PCR cycling was performed in a Perkin-Elmer 480 thermal cycler. The reaction parameters for eubacterial primers pAf and
pHr (5) were 26 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, 72°C for 2 min, and 72°C for 5 min. Nested amplifications with
the Nitrosospira-specific primer pair Ns85f and Ns1009r and
Nitrosomonas-specific primer pair Nm75f and Nm1007r were
annealed at 62 and 63°C, respectively. To enhance product yield for
environmental samples, a hot start PCR protocol was adopted. Template
DNA was added to the standard PCR mixture, and the reaction mixture was
heated to 95°C for 6 min and then at 80°C for the addition of 2 U
of Super Taq polymerase (HT Biotechnologies) through the
overlay of mineral oil. Amplification products were resolved by
electrophoresis of 10-µl aliquots of the reaction mixtures on a 0.8%
(wt/vol) agarose gel run in 1× TAE buffer (40 mM Tris-acetate, 1 mM
EDTA) (32).
16S rDNA oligonucleotide probe hybridization.
Electrophoresed PCR products were transferred from agarose gels to
Positive (Appligene) nylon membranes by capillary action according to
the manufacturer's recommendations. In all experiments, 0.4 M NaOH was
used for alkaline transfer of nucleic acids. Probes were end labelled
with [
-32P]dATP (ICN Supplies) by using 10 pM
oligonucleotide, 1 µl of 10× kinase buffer (Tris-HCl, 50 mM;
MgCl2, 10 mM; EDTA, 0.1 mM; dithiothreitol, 5 mM;
spermidine, 0.1 mM [pH 8.2]), 6 µl of sterile Hypersolv water
(BDH), 1 µl of T4 phage polynucleotide kinase (Boehringer-Mannheim),
and 1 µl of [
-32P]dATP (370 kbq) incubated at 37°C
for 1 h. The prehybridization solution contained the following:
blocking reagent (Boehringer; 2% [wt/vol]), 5× SSPE (20× SSPE is
3.6 M NaCl, 0.2 M Na2HPO4, and 20 mM EDTA,
adjusted to pH 7.4), 20% (vol/vol) deionized formamide, 0.02%
(wt/vol) sodium dodecyl sulfate and 0.1% (wt/vol)
N-laurylsarcosine prepared in sterile deionized water.
Prehybridization was for 1 h at 45°C. Hybridization with
oligonucleotide probe (AAO258) was at 10 pM in 20 ml of hybridization
solution (prehybridization solution with blocking reagent omitted) and
was performed at 55°C overnight. Following hybridization, the
membranes were washed three times for 5 min in fresh hybridization
solution at the hybridization temperature. The filters were double
wrapped in cling film and X-ray film (Fuji-film X-O-graphic) exposed
for an appropriate period.
Cloning and sequencing of PCR products.
N. europaea-N.
eutropha PCR amplicons recovered from profundal and littoral
sediment samples were ligated into the pGEM-T vector (Promega) in
accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Recombinant plasmids
were used to transform 50 µl of high-efficiency competent
Escherichia coli cells (Promega). Transformed cells were
plated onto agar containing X-Gal
(5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside) and
ampicillin as recommended by the manufacturer. White colonies were
selected and checked for inserts by PCR amplification with the primers
Nm75f and Nm1007r and by probing with oligonucleotide AAO258. Sequences
were obtained with an automated laser ABI 373A DNA sequencer and
analyzed by using the Genetics Computer Group (GCG) suite of programs
(4). 16S rDNA sequences derived from environmental samples
were aligned in conjunction with representative sequences deposited in
the National Science Foundation Ribosomal Database Project (RDP)
(25). Data analysis and manipulation were performed with the
Genetic Data Environment (GDE) software (6). Phenograms were
generated by using either the Jukes-Cantor (14) correction
in the DNADIST program and the neighbor-joining method (31)
or by maximum parsimony analysis from the PHYLIP 3.4. program. The
robustness of the inferred phylogenies was determined by bootstrap
analysis based on 100 resamplings of the data performed with SEQBOOT
(PHYLIP 3.4). A consensus phenogram was generated by using the program
CONSENSE (PHYLIP 3.4).
RFLP analysis of cloned 16S rDNA.
16S rDNA sequences of
ammonia oxidizers in the GenBank and RDP databases were examined by
using the MAPSORT program (GCG) to identify potential restriction
sites. Restriction enzymes which theoretically distinguished between
species were applied to 16S rDNA amplified from pure cultures of
ammonia oxidizers, and restriction patterns were examined by agarose
gel electrophoresis as described above. Restriction digestions were
performed with enzymes supplied by Boehringer-Mannheim in accordance
with the manufacturer's instructions. 16S rDNA amplified from sediment
samples by using Nitrosomonas-specific nested PCR
amplification as described above was subjected to this restriction analysis.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The 16S rDNA sequences
obtained from the environmental samples have been deposited in GenBank
under accession no. AF134441 to AF134470.
 |
RESULTS |
Buttermere has an area of 0.94 km2, a maximum depth of
28.6 m, and a mean depth of 16.6 m. The pH of the lakewater
was constant at pH 6.6 to 6.9 throughout the year. Lake stratification
became established in July and persisted until overturned in November. The oxythermocline was at a 14-m depth, which was used as the lakewater
sampling point. Water column and sediment samples were analyzed by a
nested PCR technique. Products obtained from the initial eubacterial
PCR amplification by using the pAf-pHr primer pair were diluted
appropriately and used as template DNA for PCRs with either the
Nitrosospira-specific or N. europaea-N.
eutropha-specific primers designed by Head et al. (11).
Amplification of a 0.93-kb region of the 16S rRNA gene was achieved in
all sediment and lakewater samples by using the
Nitrosospira-specific primer pair Ns85f and Ns1009r as
confirmed by hybridization to the oligonucleotide probe AAO258
(11). Nitrosospira spp. were therefore detected
in Buttermere sediment and lakewater throughout the seasonal cycle
(1995 to 1996). PCR amplification with the N. europaea-N.
eutropha-specific primers (Nm75f and Nm1007r) (11)
generated products of the correct size (0.9 kb) from a number of
sediment and lakewater samples collected during the summer months (Fig.
1). The amplicons were confirmed as
ammonia oxidizer rrn genes by Southern hybridization with
the radioactively labelled oligonucleotide probe AAO258 (Fig. 1).
Nitrosomonad DNA could not be detected in any of the sediment or
lakewater samples taken during the winter months. The
Nitrosomonas primer pair (Nm75f and Nm1007r) is highly
specific for the N. europaea-N. eutropha lineage, but does
not amplify 16S rDNA from other Nitrosomonas spp.
(43). The N. europaea-N. eutropha environmental 16S rDNA obtained from this oligotrophic lake was subjected to further
analysis.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Nitrosomonas-specific 16S rDNA amplification
products from lakewater and sediment samples. (A and B) Littoral
sediment. (A) Agarose gel. (B) Southern blot with AAO258. (C and D)
Profundal sediment. (C) Agarose gel. (D) Southern blot with AAO258. (E
and F) Lakewater. (E) Agarose gel. (F) Southern blot with AAO258.
Lanes: 1, July 1995; 2, August 1995; 3, September 1995; 4, November
1995; 5, March 1996; 6, May 1996; 7, N. europaea (Nm50); 8, N. eutropha (Nm57); 9, Nitrosospira sp. (NV141);
10, sterile distilled water; M, MBI molecular weight marker, 21.
|
|
Ammonia-oxidizing bacterium 16S rDNA sequence diversity.
The
N. europaea-N. eutropha amplification products were ligated
into the pGEM-T cloning vector, and high transformation efficiencies were obtained (up to 5.86 × 109 CFU
µg
1). A total of 73 clones were recovered, all of which
hybridized to the ammonia oxidizer oligonucleotide probe AAO258. This
further confirmed the widespread occurrence of the AAO258 target
sequence in
-Proteobacteria ammonia oxidizers
(37). A total of 27 of these clones (14 from littoral
sediment samples and 13 from profundal sediment samples) were selected
for partial sequence analysis (345 bp of the V3 region of the 16S rRNA
gene). The inserts in each of the clones were sequenced in both
directions with corroboration by a third analysis by using three
primers: Nm75f, Nm1007r, and pDr. The primer sequences and E. coli positions for Nm75 and Nm1007r are described by Hiorns et al.
(12), and the sequence and E. coli position for
the third primer (pDr) are given by Edwards et al. (5). Data
obtained from FASTA and BLAST searches of the GenBank database
confirmed that the 14 clones from littoral sediment DNA (L) showed
>95% homology to the 16S rDNA sequence of the N. europaea
type strain. The 13 clones from profundal sediment DNA (P) were >95%
homologous with the 16S rDNA sequence of the N. eutropha
type strain. In all cases, the next 10 best alignments were also
sequences from ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. These data suggest that the
Nitrosomonas cluster 7 (15, 35, 37) population at
each site is characteristic, with either N. europaea or
N. eutropha-like organisms predominating. Furthermore, the
specificity of the primer-probe combination used to obtain cloned DNA
from environmental samples was confirmed by the sequence alignments without exception.
A phylogenetic tree constructed by the analysis of alignments of 27 unambiguous environmental DNA sequences and generated by the
Jukes-Cantor DNA distance method (14) is presented in Fig.
2. The topology of the trees was
confirmed by using maximum parsimony analysis of the bootstrapped
sequence data. The branching order of the tree (Fig. 2) demonstrated
that the sequences of 16S rDNA amplified by the N. europaea-N.
eutropha primers from Buttermere sediments formed two clusters
that corresponded to the location of the sampling site (i.e., profundal
versus littoral sediment). The sequences (345 bp) from the littoral
sediment samples (L) grouped with the N. europaea type
strain, and the sequences (345 bp) derived from profundal sediment (P)
grouped with N. eutropha. The relatively high bootstrap
values confirmed the distinction between these two clusters. Bootstrap
values within each group were low due to the high intracluster sequence
homology and the relatively short length of sequence analyzed. Two
clones (designated PV3 and LV3) from profundal
and littoral sediments, respectively, were selected from each cluster,
and extended sequences (701 bp) were determined. The phenogram
generated was analogous to that previously obtained from the shorter
sequences (345 bp) with comparable bootstrap values (data not shown).
This more detailed sequence analysis of the representative clones
resulted in greater definition of the two Nitrosomonas
clusters and their linkage to the N. eutropha and N. europaea type strains, with bootstrap values of 100%. This is the
first reported recovery of a spatial distinction between N. europaea and N. eutropha sequence homologues directly
from the environment.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Phylogenetic tree showing the position within members of
the class -Proteobacteria of partial 16S rDNA sequences
recovered from Buttermere lake sediments by using primers designed to
amplify sequences from the -subgroup ammonia-oxidizing bacteria.
Sequences from the strains named were obtained from the RDP
(25). Sequence analysis was performed for 345 base
positions. E. coli was used as an outgroup. Bootstrap values
represent percentages from 100 resamplings of the data (14,
31). The scale bar indicates 0.1 substitutions per nucleotide
base. Environmental clones are referred to with reference to the sample
site from which they were recovered, with PV3 indicating
profundal sediment (September), PV2 indicating profundal
sediment (August), LV1 indicating littoral sediment (July),
and LV3 indicating littoral sediment (September). cons,
consensus.
|
|
Restriction analysis of 16S rRNA genes of ammonia-oxidizing
bacteria.
PCR-RFLP analysis can be used to analyze genotypes
within complex microbial populations and was developed here on the
basis of published sequence information. The objective was to provide a
system for rapidly screening environmental clones (and ultimately amplified environmental DNA preparations) to make cluster assignments. Analysis of suitable restriction sites within a 0.93-kb region of the
16S rRNA gene from selected strains of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria was
undertaken with the MAPSORT program in the GCG package (4).
Three restriction enzymes (EagI, EaeI, and
HinfI) could in theory be applied to differentiate N. europaea and N. eutropha 16S rDNA. In addition,
EaeI discriminates between the Nitrosospira group
and the N. europaea-N. eutropha lineage. A combination of the three restriction enzymes HaeIII, RsaI, and
TaqI revealed theoretical RFLP patterns that further
delineated six published Nitrosospira sequences from one
another and from the two Nitrosomonas spp. (N. europaea and N. eutropha).
The 0.93-kb regions of 16S rDNA amplified from laboratory cultures of
N. europaea,
N. eutropha, and two strains of
Nitrosospira (Nv141 and Nsp22) were digested with
EagI,
HinfI,
TaqI, and
HaeIII.
The banding patterns (Fig.
3) gave the restriction profiles
predicted
by the MAPSORT analysis described above. The RFLP patterns
with
either
HaeIII or
TaqI differentiated the two
Nitrosospira strains
from one another, suggesting that this
RFLP analysis has the potential
to discriminate genotypes within the
Nitrosospira group.
EagI,
HinfI, and
HaeIII digestion of
N. europaea and
N. eutropha 16S
rDNA gave RFLP patterns that discriminated between
these two species
(Fig.
3). Clones of 16S rDNA PCR amplified from
Buttermere littoral
and profundal sediment samples by using
N. europaea-N. eutropha lineage primer pairs were similarly analyzed.
Initially, the restriction
analysis was applied to four sequenced
clones of
N. europaea and
N. eutropha to confirm
the validity of species identification
based on the RFLP system. An
example of the restriction profiles
obtained is presented in Fig.
4. As expected from the data in
Fig.
2
and
4, by RFLP, the LV
3L and LV
3K clones were
identified
as
N. europaea sequences, and the PV
3
and PV
2P clones were identified
as
N. eutropha
sequences. A total of 19 clones from amplified
sediment 16S rDNA which
had not been sequenced were then selected
at random for similar
analysis, and the RFLP data are presented
in Table
1. Each of the clones was identified
accordingly as
either
N. europaea or
N. eutropha,
and the distribution of these
two
Nitrosomonas spp. was
again segregated between the two sediment
sampling locations in
complete agreement with the sequence data
(Fig.
2). Further analysis of
the RFLP banding patterns obtained
with the three restriction enzymes
enabled the recognition of
five RFLP classes (Table
1). Two of the
classes (A and B) were
recovered from profundal sediment (
N. eutropha), and three (C,
D, and E) were recovered from littoral
sediment (
N. europaea).
It is noteworthy that the
N. europaea type strain was located
in the RFLP class (E) that
clearly predominated in littoral sediment
(Table
1).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Agarose gel electrophoresis demonstrating the
restriction patterns of a selection of ammonia oxidizer pure culture
16S rDNA sequences digested with EagI (lanes 1 to 4),
HinfI (lanes 5 to 8), TaqI (lanes 9 to 12), or
HaeIII (lanes 13 to 16). Lanes: A, Nitrosospira
sp. (NV141); B, Nitrosospira sp. (Nsp.22); C, N. europaea (Nm50); D, N. eutropha (Nm57); M, MBI
molecular weight marker, 21; X, 100-bp ladder (Gibco).
|
|

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Agarose gel electrophoresis demonstrating the
restriction patterns of cloned 16S rDNA from Buttermere sediments
digested with HaeIII (lanes 5 to 8), HinfI (lanes
9 to 12), EagI (lanes 13 to 16), or uncut DNA (lanes 1 to
4). Lanes: A, clone LV3K; B, clone LV3; C,
clone PV2P; D, clone PV3K; M, MBI molecular
weight marker, 21; X, 100-bp ladder (Gibco).
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Distribution of RFLP classes amongst
Nitrosomonas 16S rDNA clones from sediment samples and
pure cultures
|
|
The amplified
Nitrosomonas 16S rDNA products from the two
profundal and two littoral sediment samples cloned and sequenced
to
produce the phylogenetic tree (Fig.
2) were analyzed, and the
RFLP
patterns are presented in Fig.
5. Each of
the three enzymes
generated RFLP patterns that were in agreement in
their classification
of each 16S rDNA sample. The two profundal 16S
rDNAs identified
as showing the relative predominance of
N. eutropha over
N. europaea by cloning and sequencing
(Fig.
2) were also classified as such
by the RFLP analysis (Fig.
5,
lanes 1 and 2). Similarly, one of
the littoral 16S rDNAs demonstrated a
relative predominance of
N. europaea over
N. eutropha (Fig.
2 and Fig.
5, lane 4). The
other littoral 16S rDNA
(Fig.
5, lane 3) gave a pattern that suggested
a mixture of the two
species, although all 11 of the clones sequenced
from this sample had
been identified as
N. europaea (Fig.
2).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Agarose gel electrophoresis of 16S rDNA amplified from
profundal and littoral sediment samples with N. europaea-N.
eutropha lineage primers and restriction digested with
EaeI, HinfI, and HaeIII. (A) Uncut
DNA. (B) HaeIII. (C) HinfI. (D) EaeI.
Lanes: 1, profundal sediment (September); 2, profundal sediment
(August); 3, littoral sediment (September); 4, littoral sediment
(July); M, MBI molecular weight marker, 21; X, 100-bp DNA mass ladder
(Gibco).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Analysis of bacterial DNA amplified directly from environmental
samples has become a well-established approach to the determination of
community structure in an ecological context. Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria are functionally important in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. In the study reported here, the presence of autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in sediment and lakewater was detected by
nested PCR amplification and subsequent oligonucleotide probing. While
direct amplification of ammonia oxidizer 16S rDNA from the environment
in a single step has been demonstrated (15, 18, 35, 38), the
nested approach has the advantage that species of limited abundance may
also be recovered. The application of oligonucleotide probe
hybridization to PCR products throughout also ensured the fidelity of
the amplified DNA, confirmed by the observation that all sequenced
clones gave close matches with ammonia oxidizer 16S rDNA sequences in
the GenBank database. The data for the oligotrophic Buttermere
environment reported here corroborate those reported previously for the
eutrophic Esthwaite Water environment (12) and indeed
elsewhere (15, 37) in demonstrating the ubiquity of
nitrosospiras. There is accordingly no shortage of phylogenetic
analyses of environmental Nitrosospira sequences, while
direct detection of Nitrosomonas 16S rDNA is less frequently
reported and is usually associated with nutrient-rich environments
(9, 13, 20). Nitrosomonas 16S rDNA can readily be
detected in enrichment cultures inoculated with either freshwater (10, 12) or marine (17) samples from which
nitrosomonad 16S rDNA could not be recovered directly. A number of
subclusters within the nitrosomonad group of
-Proteobacteria have been described in recent
publications, with the N. europaea-N. eutropha lineage designated as cluster 7 (15, 35, 38). It has been suggested that failure to detect nitrosomonads directly has been due to the use
of primers that target only the closely related species N. europaea and N. eutropha, which have a limited
environmental distribution that does not include the natural freshwater
environment (28). The data presented here clearly show
direct detection of the N. europaea-N. eutropha lineage in
both freshwater and sediment samples from Buttermere, but only in the
summer months, perhaps suggesting that these organisms are not
predominant within the freshwater ammonia-oxidizing community. It may
be significant that the only other report of direct detection of
N. europaea-N. eutropha 16S rDNA in freshwater was also from
an oligotrophic lake (35).
The direct amplification of Nitrosomonas spp. from
Buttermere was only achieved with samples taken during the summer
months (July to September). This seasonal occurrence corresponds to a slight increase in ammonia concentration from 5 µg
liter
1 (January) to 12 µg liter
1 (July)
at a 5-m depth (7), which may have led to an increase in
Nitrosomonas cell numbers. This relationship between
Nitrosomonas population size and nutrient concentration
would explain the direct molecular biological detection of N. europaea in sewage treatment systems (20, 45),
enrichment cultures (12), and amended soils (9),
but not the failure to detect these species in eutrophic lakes
(10, 12). The relative distribution of species within the
ammonia-oxidizing community of complex environments such as freshwater
lakes is, however, likely to be influenced by many parameters. Ward et
al. (46) reported that oxygen concentration, temperature,
and inorganic nutrient concentrations across the oxic-anoxic interface
of the Plussee, a eutrophic environment, all affected the distribution
of ammonia oxidizers.
Due to the relative paucity of 16S rDNA sequence information about
nitrosomonad DNA recovered directly from the environment, we
concentrated our cloning and sequencing study on these samples. The
high specificity of the primer pair used to amplify DNA from members of
the N. europaea-N. eutropha lineage was confirmed by the
alignment of all environmental sequences obtained with this group (Fig.
2). In fact, the sequences formed two clusters centered on each of the
type strains, demonstrating the occurrence of both species in
Buttermere sediment. N. europaea and N. eutropha
are very closely related on the basis of full 16S rDNA sequence
alignments (11), to the extent that separate species status
is doubtful. The recovery of distinct clusters here, with bootstrap
support (93% [Fig. 2]), at least confirms that there are two centers
of variation within this lineage. The complete segregation of clones from profundal and littoral sediment into two Nitrosomonas
clusters most closely related to each of these named species is
surprising, given their close 16S rDNA sequence similarity. The data
suggest that the genotypes are location specific and have adapted to
the conditions present at each site. Unlike higher organisms, examples of the relationship between environmental niche and speciation are
relatively rare in environmental microbiology, where speciation is less
well defined and the structure of the bacterial community is
heterogeneous and complex. In the marine environment, Phillips et al.
(27) recently used 16S rDNA data to demonstrate the
predominance of N. eutropha in particle-associated samples
in contrast to planktonic samples that were dominated by
Nitrosospira spp. In terrestrial environments, niches are
isolated and distinct ammonia oxidizer species compositions have been
described and related to environmental parameters (15, 18,
39). Oxygen tension is the most likely significant difference
between the littoral (10 m) and profundal (25 m) sediment sites
studied, because the oxycline in summer was recorded at a 14-m depth.
Enrichment studies of Esthwaite Water provided evidence of distinct
ammonia oxidizer communities on the basis of ammonia sensitivity
(10), and we have obtained similar data for Buttermere (not
shown). However, the phylogenetic analysis presented in Fig. 2 actually
demonstrates that the nitrosomonad 16S rDNA sequences recovered from
two distinct sites are related to two species. It is worth noting that
this kind of fine-scale observation of the relationship between ammonia
oxidizer species composition and habitats within an environment can
only be made by the application of molecular biological techniques.
Descriptions of the genotypic composition of natural microbial
communities is best achieved by cloning and sequencing 16S rDNA
recovered from environmental samples. This is time-consuming and
laborious, and methods based on DNA fingerprinting are therefore attractive. Denaturing or temperature gradient gel electrophoresis is
emerging as a powerful technique in this respect (21) and has been applied to ammonia-oxidizing bacterial communities (15, 16, 38). Sequence information and the phylogenies produced can
also be used to develop protocols for direct detection of well-defined
genotypes or species by RFLP, and this was the approach adopted here
for N. europaea and N. eutropha. When using 16S
rDNA amplified with N. europaea-N. eutropha-specific
primers, restriction enzymes can be selected which differentiate pure
cultures of each species and clones that have been identified by
sequence analysis (Fig. 3 and 4). The utility of this RFLP method was
demonstrated by identifying clones with one or the other of the two
species without the need to sequence the 16S rDNA, and the RFLP data
further confirmed the segregation of N. europaea and
N. eutropha-like 16S rDNA sequences between two sediment
sites. We extended this analysis to 16S rDNA amplified from each site
and were able to classify the samples in relation to the relative
abundance of N. europaea and N. eutropha 16S rDNA
sequences, one against the other (Fig. 5), in accordance with the
detailed phylogenetic analysis. In one of the four samples analyzed,
the data suggested that both species were present, but the protocol can
at least be applied to screen samples for further analysis. We used
four restriction enzymes and suggest that environmental samples can be
processed in this way to rapidly determine both the presence and
relative predominance of these two ammonia-oxidizing species and
monitor shifts between them in relation to environmental variation.
Again, this information on the occurrence and distribution of N. europaea and N. eutropha would be virtually impossible
to obtain without the application of molecular biological techniques
and would be cumbersome by conventional cloning and sequence analysis.
In addition to the differentiation of environmental 16S rDNA sequences
which form clades with either N. europaea or N. eutropha, our RFLP data on classes within this group and on
nitrosospiras (Table 1) show that the technique could be further
developed to refine genotypic analysis of ammonia-oxidizing communities
in general. Previous studies have applied PCR-RFLP analysis to analyze
the sequence diversity of bacterial populations in the environment
(3, 22, 26, 45). Ward (45) identified intra- and
intersite diversity of sequences from isolates of aquatic denitrifying
bacteria by RFLP analysis. In a similar study, Navarro et al.
(22) characterized populations of Nitrobacter
from soils and a freshwater lake. They applied PCR-RFLP analysis to DNA
sequences from the intergenic spacer region (IGS) and suggested that
the Nitrobacter populations which coexisted in the same
niches were genetically divergent. For ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, RFLP
identification based on PCR-amplified 16S rDNA should be unequivocal,
because ribotyping of the 16S and 23S rDNA from 12 isolates of
ammonia-oxidizing bacteria revealed the presence of only one
rrn operon per genome (1), an observation that is
probably correlated with the slow growth rate of these chemoautotrophic bacteria.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are grateful to Glenn Rhodes and Paul Loughnane for assistance
with lakewater and sediment sampling and Angela Rosin for technical
assistance with DNA sequencing. This work was funded by the Natural
Environment Research Council (NERC) of the United Kingdom.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: School of
Biological Sciences, Life Sciences Building, University of Liverpool,
Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom. Phone: 151 794 4413. Fax: 151 794 4401. E-mail: aj55m{at}liverpool.ac.uk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aakra, A.,
J. B. Utåker, and I. F. Nes.
1999.
Restriction fragment length polymorphism of rRNA genes and sequencing of the 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer region of ammonia-oxidising bacteria: a phylogenetic approach.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
49:123-130[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Bruce, K. D.,
W. D. Hiorns,
J. L. Hobman,
A. M. Osborn,
P. Strike, and D. A. Ritchie.
1992.
Amplification of DNA from native populations of soil bacteria by using the polymerase chain reaction.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
58:3413-3416[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Bruce, K. D.
1997.
Analysis of mer gene subclasses within bacterial communities in soils and sediments resolved by fluorescent-PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism profiling.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63:4914-4919[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Devereux, J.,
P. Haeberli, and O. Smithies.
1984.
A comprehensive set of sequence-analysis programs for the VAX.
Nucleic Acids Res.
12:387-395.
|
| 5.
|
Edwards, U.,
T. Rogall,
H. Blöcker,
M. Emde, and E. C. Böttger.
1989.
Isolation and direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes. Characterisation of a gene encoding 16S ribosomal RNA.
Nucleic Acids Res.
17:7843-7853[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Felsenstein, J.
1993.
PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.5c.
Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle
|
| 7.
|
Freshwater Biological Association.
1998.
Annual reports 1938-1998.
Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, United Kingdom
|
| 8.
|
Hall, G. H.
1986.
Nitrification in lakes, p. 127-156.
In
J. I. Prosser (ed.), Nitrification. IRL Press, Oxford, United Kingdom
|
| 9.
|
Hastings, R. C.,
M. T. Ceccherini,
N. Miclaus,
J. R. Saunders,
M. Bazzicalupo, and A. J. McCarthy.
1997.
Direct molecular biological analysis of ammonia-oxidising bacteria populations in cultivated soil plots treated with swine manure.
FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.
23:45-54.
|
| 10.
|
Hastings, R. C.,
J. R. Saunders,
G. H. Hall,
R. W. Pickup, and A. J. McCarthy.
1998.
Application of molecular biological techniques to a seasonal study of ammonia oxidation in a eutrophic freshwater lake.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:3674-3682[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Head, I. M.,
W. D. Hiorns,
T. M. Embley,
A. J. McCarthy, and J. R. Saunders.
1993.
The phylogeny of autotrophic ammonia-oxidising bacteria as determined by analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
139:1147-1153.
|
| 12.
|
Hiorns, W. D.,
R. C. Hastings,
I. M. Head,
A. J. McCarthy,
J. R. Saunders,
R. W. Pickup, and G. H. Hall.
1995.
Amplification of 16S ribosomal RNA genes of the autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria demonstrates the ubiquity of Nitrosospiras in the environment.
Microbiology
141:2793-2800[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Hovanec, T. A., and E. F. DeLong.
1996.
Comparative analysis of nitrifying bacteria associated with freshwater and marine aquaria.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
62:2888-2896[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Jukes, T. H., and C. R. Cantor.
1969.
Evolution of protein molecules, p. 21-132.
In
H. N. Munro (ed.), Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York, N.Y
|
| 15.
|
Kowalchuk, G. A.,
J. R. Stephen,
W. De Boer,
J. I. Prosser,
T. M. Embley, and J. W. Woldendorp.
1997.
Analysis of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria of the subdivision of the class Proteobacteria in coastal sand dunes by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and sequencing of PCR-amplified 16S ribosomal DNA fragments.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63:1489-1497[Abstract].
|
| 16.
|
Kowalchuk, G. A.,
Z. S. Naoumenko,
P. Derikx,
A. Felske,
J. R. Stephen, and I. A. Arkhipchenko.
1999.
Molecular analysis of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria of the subdivision of the class Proteobacteria in compost and composted materials.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:396-403[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
McCaig, A. E.,
T. M. Embley, and J. I. Prosser.
1994.
Molecular analysis of enrichment cultures of marine ammonia-oxidisers.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
120:363-368[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
McCaig, A. E.,
C. J. Phillips,
J. R. Stephen,
G. A. Kowalchuk,
S. M. Harvey,
R. A. Herbert,
T. M. Embley, and J. I. Prosser.
1999.
Nitrogen cycling and community structure of proteobacterial -subgroup ammonia-oxidizing bacteria within polluted marine fish farm sediments.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:213-220[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
McTavish, H.,
J. A. Fuchs, and A. B. Hooper.
1993.
Sequence of the gene coding for ammonia monooxygenase in Nitrosomonas europaea.
J. Bacteriol.
175:2436-2444[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Mobarry, B. K.,
M. Wagner,
V. Urbain,
B. E. Rittmann, and D. A. Stahl.
1996.
Phylogenetic probes for analyzing abundance and spatial organization of nitrifying bacteria.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
62:2156-2162[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Muyzer, G.,
E. C. De Waal, and A. G. Uitterlinden.
1993.
Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
59:695-700[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Navarro, E.,
P. Simonet,
P. Norman, and R. Bardin.
1992.
Characterization of natural populations of Nitrobacter spp. using PCR/RFLP analysis of the ribosomal intergenic spacer.
Arch. Microbiol.
157:107-115[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Norton, J. M.,
J. M. Low, and M. G. Klotz.
1996.
The gene encoding ammonia-monooxygenase subunit A exists in three nearly identical copies in Nitrosospira sp. NpAV.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
139:181-188[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Ohnstad, F. R., and J. G. Jones.
1982.
The Jenkin surface mud sampler. User manual. Freshwater Biological Association annual report no. 15.
Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, United Kingdom. (Occasional publication.)
|
| 25.
|
Olsen, G. J.,
N. Larsen, and C. R. Woese.
1991.
The ribosomal RNA database project (RDP).
Nucleic Acids Res.
19(Suppl.):2017-2021.
|
| 26.
|
Osborn, A. M.,
K. D. Bruce,
P. Strike, and D. A. Ritchie.
1993.
Polymerase chain reaction-restriction length polymorphism analysis shows divergence among mer determinants from gram-negative soil bacteria indistinguishable by DNA-DNA hybridization.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
59:4024-4030[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Phillips, C. J.,
Z. Smith,
T. M. Embley, and J. I. Prosser.
1999.
Phylogenetic differences between particle-associated and planktonic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria of the subdivision of the class Proteobacteria in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:779-786[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Pommerening-Röser, A.,
G. Rath, and H.-P. Koops.
1996.
Phylogenetic diversity within the genus Nitrosomonas.
Syst. Appl. Microbiol.
19:344-351.
|
| 29.
|
Prosser, J. I.
1989.
Autotrophic nitrification in bacteria.
Adv. Microb. Physiol.
30:125-181[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Rotthauwe, J.-H.,
K.-P. Witzel, and W. Liesack.
1997.
The ammonia monooxygenase structural gene amoA as a functional marker: molecular fine-scale analysis of the natural ammonia-oxidizing populations.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63:4704-4712[Abstract].
|
| 31.
|
Saitou, N., and M. Nei.
1987.
The neighbour joining method; a new method for constructing phylogenetic trees.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
4:406-425[Abstract].
|
| 32.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y
|
| 33.
|
Schmidt, T. M.,
E. F. DeLong, and N. R. Pace.
1991.
Analysis of a marine picoplankton community by 16S rRNA gene cloning and sequencing.
J. Bacteriol.
173:4371-4378[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Sinigalliano, C. D.,
D. N. Kuhn, and R. D. Jones.
1995.
Amplification of the amoA gene from diverse species of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and from an indigenous bacterial population from seawater.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
61:2702-2706[Abstract].
|
| 35.
|
Speksnijder, A.,
G. A. Kowalchuk,
K. Roest, and H. Laanbroek.
1998.
Recovery of a Nitrosomonas-like 16S rDNA sequence group from freshwater habitats.
Syst. Appl. Microbiol.
21:321-330[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Stehr, G.,
B. Bottcher,
P. Dittberner,
G. Rath, and H.-P. Koops.
1995.
The ammonia-oxidizing nitrifying populations of the River Elbe estuary.
FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.
17:177-186.
|
| 37.
|
Stephen, J. R.,
A. E. McCaig,
Z. Smith,
J. I. Prosser, and T. M. Embley.
1996.
Molecular diversity of soil and marine 16S rRNA gene sequences related to -subgroup ammonia-oxidizing bacteria.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
62:4147-4154[Abstract].
|
| 38.
|
Stephen, J. R.,
G. A. Kowalchuk,
M.-A. V. Bruns,
A. E. McCaig,
C. J. Phillips,
T. M. Embley, and J. I. Prosser.
1998.
Analysis of -subgroup proteobacterial ammonia oxidizer populations in soil by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis and hierarchical phylogenetic probing.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:2958-2965[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Stephen, J. R.,
Y.-J. Chang,
S. J. Macnaughton,
G. A. Kowalchuk,
K. T. Leung,
C. A. Flemming, and D. C. White.
1999.
Effect of toxic metals on indigenous soil -subgroup proteobacterium ammonia oxidizer community structure and protection against toxicity by inoculated metal-resistant bacteria.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:95-101[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Suwa, Y.,
T. Sumino, and K. Noto.
1997.
Phylogenetic relationships of activated sludge isolates of ammonia-oxidisers with different sensitivities to ammonium sulphate.
J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol.
43:373-379.
|
| 41.
|
Teske, A.,
E. Alm,
J. M. Regan,
S. Toze,
B. E. Rittmann, and D. A. Stahl.
1994.
Evolutionary relationships among ammonia- and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria.
J. Bacteriol.
176:6623-6630[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Utåker, J. B.,
L. R. Bakken,
Q. Q. Jiang, and I. F. Nes.
1995.
Phylogenetic analysis of seven new isolates of the highly related ammonia-oxidising bacteria based on 16S rRNA gene sequences.
Syst. Appl. Microbiol.
18:549-559.
|
| 43.
|
Utåker, J. B., and I. F. Nes.
1998.
A qualitative evaluation of the published oligonucleotide specific for the 16S rRNA gene sequences of the ammonia-oxidising bacteria.
Syst. Appl. Microbiol.
21:1-17[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Wagner, M.,
G. Rath,
R. Amann,
H.-P. Koops, and K.-H. Schleifer.
1995.
In situ identification of ammonia-oxidising bacteria.
Syst. Appl. Microbiol.
18:251-264.
|
| 45.
|
Ward, B. B.
1995.
Diversity of culturable denitrifying bacteria-limits of rDNA RFLP analysis and probes for the functional gene, nitrite reductase.
Arch. Microbiol.
163:167-175.
|
| 46.
|
Ward, B. B.,
M. A. Voytek, and K.-P. Witzel.
1997.
Phylogenetic diversity of natural populations of ammonia-oxidisers investigated by specific PCR amplification.
Microb. Ecol.
33:87-96[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Watson, S. W., and M. Mandel.
1971.
Comparisons of the morphology and deoxyribonucleic acid components of 27 strains of nitrifying bacteria.
J. Bacteriol.
107:563-569[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 1999, p. 4855-4862, Vol. 65, No. 11
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Coci, M., Bodelier, P. L. E., Laanbroek, H. J.
(2008). Epiphyton as a Niche for Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria: Detailed Comparison with Benthic and Pelagic Compartments in Shallow Freshwater Lakes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 1963-1971
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bent, S. J., Gucker, C. L., Oda, Y., Forney, L. J.
(2003). Spatial Distribution of Rhodopseudomonas palustris Ecotypes on a Local Scale. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 5192-5197
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bollmann, A., Bar-Gilissen, M.-J., Laanbroek, H. J.
(2002). Growth at Low Ammonium Concentrations and Starvation Response as Potential Factors Involved in Niche Differentiation among Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68: 4751-4757
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zehr, J. P., Ward, B. B.
(2002). Nitrogen Cycling in the Ocean: New Perspectives on Processes and Paradigms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68: 1015-1024
[Full Text]
-
Regan, J. M., Harrington, G. W., Noguera, D. R.
(2002). Ammonia- and Nitrite-Oxidizing Bacterial Communities in a Pilot-Scale Chloraminated Drinking Water Distribution System. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68: 73-81
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Burrell, P. C., Phalen, C. M., Hovanec, T. A.
(2001). Identification of Bacteria Responsible for Ammonia Oxidation in Freshwater Aquaria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
67: 5791-5800
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Purkhold, U., Pommerening-Röser, A., Juretschko, S., Schmid, M. C., Koops, H.-P., Wagner, M.
(2000). Phylogeny of All Recognized Species of Ammonia Oxidizers Based on Comparative 16S rRNA and amoA Sequence Analysis: Implications for Molecular Diversity Surveys. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
66: 5368-5382
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ward, B. B., Martino, D. P., Diaz, M. C., Joye, S. B.
(2000). Analysis of Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria from Hypersaline Mono Lake, California, on the Basis of 16S rRNA Sequences. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
66: 2873-2881
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bano, N., Hollibaugh, J. T.
(2000). Diversity and Distribution of DNA Sequences with Affinity to Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria of the beta Subdivision of the Class Proteobacteria in the Arctic Ocean. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
66: 1960-1969
[Abstract]
[Full Text]