INTRODUCTION

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and methods Results and discussion References

Carbon dioxide has a dual physiological role in microorganisms since it can both stimulate and inhibit cell development. The inhibitory action has been increasingly exploited to improve the hygiene of both liquid and solid foodstuffs by protecting them from bacterial spoilage (6, 7, 9, 20). Blickstad et al. (3) reported the effect of carbon dioxide on the microflora of pork and found that increasing the partial pressure of carbon dioxide added to the packaging atmosphere prolonged the shelf life of the meat.

The effect of compressed carbon dioxide on different types of microorganisms has been studied by several researchers (1, 4, 5, 8-11, 15-17). Microbial inactivation by CO₂ is dependent on many parameters. Some of the experimental conditions, such as temperature, pressure, and moisture, contribute to a more effective treatment by increasing the diffusivity of CO₂ (10, 11, 16, 19). Within certain limits, a longer duration of exposure to carbon dioxide permits better sterilization; exposure time can be decreased by increasing the temperature (1). Microbial resistance to CO₂ also depends on the type of microorganism, the phase of growth, and the suspension medium, the last of which can inhibit the bactericidal effect of compressed CO₂, especially in some food systems rich in proteins (20).

Various hypotheses have been proposed to explain the microbicidal activity of carbon dioxide. Lin et al. (13, 14) have observed that, at high pressure, supercritical carbon dioxide penetrates cells and ruptures them when it is released suddenly. They were even able to improve the rate of disruption by repeatedly releasing the CO₂ pressure. Fraser (8) has also evoked this subject; he observed that the best microbial destruction results were obtained when the CO₂ pressure was released as rapidly as possible. In food with a high water content, CO₂ dissolves in the water to form carbonic acid, according to the following equilibrium reactions: Thus, dissolved CO₂ acts by lowering the pH of the medium, and the resulting acidity leads to a disturbance of some biological systems within the cells. It was therefore suggested that microbial inhibition was due to an alteration in the properties of the cell (membrane, cytoplasm, enzymes, etc.) (6). However, a reduction in the pH of the medium is not sufficient to account for the antimicrobial action of CO₂, since it shows a specific inhibitory effect which is greater than that of the other acids used to lower medium acidity (hydrochloric acid, phosphoric acid, etc.) (2, 9, 12, 16). These acids do not penetrate the microbial cells as easily as carbon dioxide.

This paper describes the feasibility of using a new pressurizable reactor system, developed by our laboratory, to destroy microorganisms. Our work focused on the study of the inactivation by compressed carbon dioxide of three microorganism strains inoculated onto filter paper disks. The parameters explored were mainly exposure time and pressure at room temperature. The effect of each parameter was investigated in a systematic study and followed up by response-surface methodology. The end point acidity of the samples was determined by measuring the pH of the suspensions in which the filter paper disks were disintegrated. Moreover, we observed the effect of water content on cell destruction and compared the results obtained with sudden and slow decompression rates.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and methods Results and discussion References

Growth of cells. Three microbial strains were used as test organisms: Escherichia coli IP 6532, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 400. Before each test, microorganisms from cultures stored at 4°C were grown overnight in recovery medium containing (per liter) 5 g of peptone, 2 g of yeast extract, 5 g of NaCl, and 5 g of glucose. The bacteria were incubated at 37°C; the yeast was incubated at 30°C. The cell concentration in the resulting suspensions was generally about 10⁸ CFU/ml. The absence of contamination in the suspensions was confirmed by Gram staining.

Sample preparation. Hydrophilic filter paper disks (50-mm diameter, Whatman no. 1) were autoclaved at 120°C for 20 min. Just before the tests were conducted, each microbial suspension was aseptically dispersed onto a filter paper disk, which will retain all the deposited suspension volume (100 µl). The inoculated disk was placed vertically inside a sterile flask (50 ml) containing a small Teflon-covered magnetic stirring bar and five sterile glass beads (5-mm diameter). Flasks were kept closed until it was time to perform the experiment.

Apparatus. The processing reactor used in this work was made entirely of stainless steel (Fig. 1). The reactor consisted of a pressure vessel with an internal volume of 5 liters (Fig. 1b) connected to a 1,600-liter vacuum tank (Fig. 1c); the two tanks were separated by a large-diameter valve (Fig. 1d). Compressed carbon dioxide was supplied from a gas cylinder (Fig. 1a) which was linked, by a valve (Fig. 1g), to the pressure vessel. A precision manometer (Fig. 1f), CITEC (AISI 316 TI/L), was installed in the vessel to measure the pressure. Except where mentioned, experiments were carried out with a sudden release of pressure, which was obtained by opening the decompression valve (Fig. 1d) between the two tanks. The pressure in the vacuum tank could be adjusted between 5 kPa and atmospheric pressure, and the pressure at the end of the experiment could be controlled. On the other hand, the vacuum was maintained in the vessel before application of CO₂ pressure, and this avoided any possibility of having a CO₂-air mixture at the beginning of the experiment.

View larger version (47K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1.   Schematic representation of the pressurizable reactor configuration. a, compressed CO2; b, pressure vessel; c, vacuum tank; d, decompression valve; e, vacuum pump; f, precision manometer; g, compression valve; h, outlet; i, pressure regulator.

Process. Open flasks containing filter paper disks were placed in the pressure vessel at the beginning of each experiment. The vessel was immediately sealed, and when all the tubing connections were secured, the vacuum was established by connecting the vessel to the vacuum tank. After the decompression valve was closed, carbon dioxide (Air Liquide, 99.7% pure) was injected into the vessel at the selected pressure. Microbial cells were treated at pressures ranging from 1.5 to 5.5 MPa and for various exposure times. The apparatus allows carbon dioxide to be injected very quickly (within 10 s). The holding time began as soon as the vessel reached the experimental pressure and ended with a sudden (0.4-s) release of the CO₂ pressure. All of the experiments were carried out at room temperature. The flasks in the vessel were closed and removed, and the surviving cells were immediately counted. Before each test, the inside surfaces of the vessel were wiped clean with cotton moistened with a 70% alcohol solution. The reported results are the average of at least duplicate tests.

Enumeration of living microorganisms. The viability of S. cerevisiae, E. coli, and E. faecalis was determined by counting the number of CFU per milliliter. Each processed disk was diluted with 30 ml of an aqueous TS solution (1 g of tryptone per liter, 8.5 g of NaCl per liter). The contents of the flask were then mixed well by magnetic stirring for 30 min. This mixing led to a total disintegration of the filter paper, and the microorganisms were subsequently dispersed in the solution. The dispersion obtained was then diluted, and 1 ml of the appropriate dilution was plated on duplicate petri dishes containing a suitable growth medium. Yeast was grown on yeast glucose agar (Biokar Diagnostics, BK 053) (per liter: yeast extract, 5 g; glucose, 20 g; bacteriological agar, 15 g). The bacteria were grown on nutrient agar (Biokar Diagnostics, BK 021) (per liter: meat extract, 5 g; tryptone, 10 g; NaCl, 5 g; bacteriological agar, 15 g). Colonies were counted after 24 h of incubation at 37°C (bacteria) and at 30°C (yeast). Microbial cells in the control samples were counted by the same procedures described for treated samples. The acidity of each inoculated disk was expressed by measuring the pH of the TS solution in which the filter paper was suspended after its disintegration. Measurements were realized with an electrode connected to a pH meter (pH 539, Wissenschaftlich-Technische-Werkstätten). Whenever necessary, the water content of the inoculated disks was determined at 100°C with an infrared balance (Mettler LP16).

Design of experiments. Response surface is a statistical methodology which consists of two distinct parts, the design of the experiment and the analysis of the data (18). As for the experimental design, two factors, CO₂ pressure (P) and exposure time (t), were studied at five levels. The response for each treatment level is the response variable. It was assumed that the main response variables were the rate of inactivation and the acidity. Response-surface methodology is used to study the relationship between the response variables and the factors; it also allows a mathematical model to be developed that can predict the value of the response variable for given levels of pressure and exposure time. A central composite design with two factors was used (Table 1). This set of designs consists of a full or fractional two-level experiment (coded as ±1), designed to value all of the linear and interaction terms, and of center points and star points (coded as 0 and ±, respectively) used to estimate the quadratic terms (18). This randomized design yielded 10 experiments with 4 (2²) factorial points, 4 (2²) star points with  = 1.68, and 2 replications of the center point. The levels of the two factors were chosen on the basis of preliminary trials. Response-surface contours and other statistical analyses were obtained by the appropriate procedures described in STATGRAPHICS Plus 1.4 (Manugistics, Inc., Rockville, Md.).

	RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and methods Results and discussion References

Systematic study of pressure and exposure time. The rate of inactivation of the three microorganisms as a function of exposure time was expressed as the logarithm of the ratio of surviving cells after treatment with CO₂ (N) to the cell count in the control culture (N₀) (Fig. 2). The error of the initial countable population (N₀) of an inoculated filter paper disk was about 25% (12 replicates). The treatment pressure chosen was 5 MPa. Zero time of treatment represents the control samples. The inactivation of the microbial cells was enhanced by increasing the exposure time. The curve for each strain has a characteristic shape that defines its own resistance. E. coli was destroyed the most quickly. The survival curves showed that E. coli was inactivated by about 3.6 log cycles after 60 min of treatment, whereas only 1.5-log and 0.2-log inactivation occurred for S. cerevisiae and E. faecalis, respectively. Experimental plots corresponding to the inactivation of E. faecalis could be placed on a straight line, showing a linear regression with a 158.7-min D value (decimal reduction time). The mechanism of destruction, ruled by a first-order kinetics, agreed with results obtained by Cuq et al. (5) at constant pressure (0.6 MPa) and temperature (55°C). Carbon dioxide under pressure exhibited a different effect against S. cerevisiae and E. coli. The results presented survival curves of two linear stages. The rate of inactivation is rapid at first, with a significantly slower rate at the later stage. The two biphasic curves showed an inflexion point which occurred after about 90 min of exposure time. These results suggest that the microorganisms were destroyed more easily at the first straight portion; the second one involved an increase in the destruction resistance. At higher pressure and temperature, Lin et al. (15) and Ballestra et al. (1) have reported the presence of the first linear regression in the kinetics of the inactivation of S. cerevisiae and E. coli, respectively. But in their studies, this stage was preceded by an earlier one with a slower rate of inactivation; it corresponded to little values of exposure time (<30 min) not exploited in this paper.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 2.   Rate of destruction of different strains of microorganisms as a function of exposure time at a CO2 pressure of 5 MPa.

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 3.   Rate of destruction of different strains of microorganisms as a function of CO2 pressure with 30 min of exposure time.

Methodology of response surfaces. The effects of the two factors (P and t) were studied only with E. coli and S. cerevisiae; E. faecalis was much more resistant than these two strains, and a very slow rate of destruction occurred at the explored levels. Analysis of variance showed that the destruction rate, expressed as log N/N₀, was dependent on these two factors, which confirms our results obtained previously. The regression coefficients are shown in Table 2, where the P values (probability) should be less than 0.05 to indicate whether a correlation exists between the two factors and the response variable.

View larger version (42K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 4.   Response surfaces and contour plots for the rate of destruction of E. coli (a) and S. cerevisiae (b) at different levels of independent variables.

End-point acidity. The second response variable investigated with the same experimental design was the variation in acidity of the samples before and after treatment. Building on the previous work, the effect of acidity and its correlation with the rate of destruction were investigated. The results of these measurements were practically the same for both strains, and so the average values were reported in Table 3. The pHs of the treated samples were the same, regardless of the treatment pressure and exposure time.

Influence of moisture. We conducted further experiments with E. coli and S. cerevisiae to investigate the influence of water content of the samples on microbial inactivation. Six filter papers were, as usual, inoculated with the microbial suspension, but the water contents of five of them were increased by addition of different volumes of sterile distilled water. The water contents of the six filter papers were 37, 52, 62, 67, 72, and 75%. All of these samples were treated under the same experimental conditions (5 MPa over 300 min). After treatment, it appeared that the rate of destruction and the drop in pH were similar for all the samples and for the two microbial strains (data not shown). A minimum of water content seems to allow the mechanism of inactivation. Thus, to clearly show the effect of a small water content, two filter papers were inoculated with an E. coli suspension and treated at 5 MPa for 300 min. Before treatment, one of the samples was dried at 30°C for 7 h; the second kept its initial water content.

Influence of the rate of decompression. We have also looked at the effect of the rate of decompression. All of the experiments in this work were undertaken with as rapid a release of pressure as possible: only 0.4 s was necessary to obtain a vacuum in the processing reactor. In order to evaluate the influence of this factor, comparative pressurization tests were performed with three different decompression times: 0.4 s, 15 min, and 50 min. The experiments were conducted for 195 min at 4 MPa for all microbial strains studied. The microorganism counts after treatment showed that there was no significant difference, with similar rates of destruction in the three experiments. Although the rate of decompression had no effect in our study, some researchers (8, 13, 14) have insisted that rapid decompression is a parameter that enhances the inactivation process. The explanation that we suggest is that these authors worked under CO₂-supercritical conditions (pressure and temperature), in which the fluid penetrates more easily into the cells. Rapid decompression may provoke cell rupture as a result of the expansion of CO₂ within the cells. This hypothesis will require further investigation.