Department of Crop & Soil Science, Oregon
State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Frankia strains are
nitrogen-fixing actinomycetes that form symbiotic relationships with 24 genera of woody dicotyledonous plants. The focus of this paper is the
Ceanothus-Frankia symbiosis. Although this symbiotic
relationship is of ecological and practical importance, very little is
known about Ceanothus-infective Frankia strains. The main reason for this is the fact that no isolates that can
reinfect the host after isolation have been recovered from
Ceanothus spp. Consequently, we studied the
diversity of the Ceanothus-infective
Frankia strains by using molecular techniques. Prior studies
in which the PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)
have been used have been useful in discriminating among closely related
Frankia strains obtained from members of other host genera
(8, 13, 15, 17). In this study, we used PCR-RFLP
techniques to characterize the Frankia strains
that infect nine Ceanothus species.
The Ceanothus species studied represent the
taxonomic diversity and geographic distribution of the genus (4,
9). The genus Ceanothus, which is indigenous
only to North America, contains 55 species. Two subgenera of the genus,
subgenera Ceanothus and Cerastes, are
recognized. The subgenus Ceanothus, the more ancient subgenus, includes evergreen species, such as C. cordulatus, C. velutinus, and C. thyrsiflorus, and deciduous species, such as C. integerrimus, C. sanguineus, and
C. americanus. The subgenus Cerastes
includes the evergreen species C. cuneatus,
C. prostratus, and C. pumilus. Because
we included the diversity of the host plants in our study, we expected
that the breadth of the diversity of the Frankia strains
that infect Ceanothus spp. would be represented.
In less comprehensive surveys, other workers have found a considerable
amount of diversity in the Frankia-Ceanothus
symbiosis (2, 14). Baker and Mullin (2) assessed
the Frankia strains inhabiting C. americanus
nodules at seven different locations in a 70-mile radius in eastern
Tennessee by using restriction endonuclease digestion of genomic DNAs
in combination with genetic probes. A total of 25 to 30 nodules were
collected per site. These authors found differences in RFLP patterns
between sites and among different plants collected from a single site.
It is unclear whether they found more than one pattern per nodule.
Murry et al. (14) used repetitive extragenic
palindromic (REP) PCR methods to characterize the diversity of
the Frankia strains associated with six
Ceanothus species located in the coastal region of
southern California. The study area was an area that had a 10-mile
radius and contained seven sites. These authors sampled two to five
mature nodule clusters per species. In addition, they compared nodules
collected from mature and immature plants. The results varied. Murry et
al. found variation within and between sites for some species and found
no variation within or between collection sites for other species.
Also, they found more than one pattern per nodule cluster. No evidence
of contaminating DNA was found, however. The conclusion of Murry et al.
was that we need more collections of Ceanothus
species to further elucidate the diversity of the Frankia
strains that inhabit these plants.
Our study was more extensive than previous studies since we included a
greater number of sites, host species, and environmental conditions.
Therefore, we predicted that we would find even higher levels of
diversity than were found previously.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Sample collection.
Nodule, soil, and shoot samples were
collected from each of the nine Ceanothus species
examined (Table 1). Samples were obtained from 19 sites in Oregon (one site for each of the seven Oregon species
and 12 sites for C. velutinus, which is more widespread than the other species assayed) and from one site in Tennessee. At
least two plants were collected per site (Table 1). The samples consisted of at least five distinct nodule clusters per site (with the
exception of the C. americanus samples [Table 1]).
Each collection was made within the geographic range of the host plant
species. All samples were transported to the laboratory on ice. Upon
arrival, nodule samples were rinsed in deionized water, washed with
Tween 80, surface sterilized with ethanol, and stored at
20°C until they were used.
DNA extraction.
Genomic DNA was prepared by using a protocol
adapted from the protocol of Baker and Mullin (2).
Individual lobe tips were excised with a scalpel and frozen in a dry
ice-ethanol bath (
70°C). DNA was extracted from a minimum of 15 lobes per species (at least three replicates per nodule cluster). No
composites were prepared to increase the chance of capturing the total
genetic diversity of the Frankia strains that infect
individual plants. Individual lobe tips were homogenized with a mortar
and pestle by using 600 µl of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide
extraction buffer (2% cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, 100 mM Tris [pH
8.0], 20 mM EDTA, 1.4 M NaCl) and were incubated at 65°C for 30 min.
The DNA was extracted twice with an equal volume of chloroform-isoamyl
alcohol (24:1) and was precipitated with 1 volume of ice-cold
isopropanol. The precipitated DNA was resuspended in 50 µl of TE (10 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 0.1 mM EDTA) (10:0.1), reprecipitated by adding
0.25 volume of 10 M ammonium acetate and 1 volume of ice-cold
isopropanol, and washed with 70% ethanol. DNA pellets were resuspended
in 50 µl of TE (10:0.1). Samples were further purified by adding 1 volume of a polyethylene glycol-NaCl mixture (20% polyethylene glycol
8000, 2.5 M NaCl). Samples were kept at 37°C for 15 min and
centrifuged. The DNA pellets were washed twice with 80% ethanol,
dried, resuspended in 50 µl of TE (10:0.1), and stored at
20°C
until they were used.
PCR amplification.
Purified genomic DNA (5 to 10 ng) was
used to amplify a 2,098-bp region of the 16S and 23S rRNA genes by the
PCR. The amplified portion included the 3' end of the 16S rRNA gene,
the intergenic spacer (IGS), and a large portion of the 23S rRNA gene.
All reactions were performed in 50-µl (final volume) reaction
mixtures containing 1.5 µl of template DNA, 5 µl of GeneAmp 10×
PCR buffer II (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Branchburg, N.J.), 1.5 mM
MgCl2, each deoxynucleoside triphosphate (Perkin-Elmer) at
a concentration of 0.2 mM, 0.2 µM forward primer 1649F
(5'-GATTGGGACGAAGTCGT-3') (20), 0.2 µM reverse
primer 2309R (5'-ATCGCATGCCTACTACC-3') (6), and 2 U of AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer). An initial denaturation at
95°C for 2 min was followed by 35 cycles consisting of denaturation
at 95°C for 45 s, annealing at 53°C for 45 s, and
extension at 72°C for 1.5 min (Coy Thermocycler, Ann Arbor, Mich.).
There was a final extension step consisting of 72°C for 5 min. The
PCR products were loaded onto a 1% agarose gel (Sea Kem; FMC
BioProducts, Rockland, Maine) and electrophoresed. After
electrophoresis, bands were excised, purified with GeneClean II (BIO
101, Vista, Calif.), resuspended in 18 µl of TE (10:0.1), and stored
at
20°C until they were used.
RFLP analysis.
Purified PCR products were digested with
restriction endonucleases for at least 4 h by using the
suppliers' instructions. The following 12 restriction enzymes were
used: HaeIII, HhaI, HinFI,
TaqI, RsaI, NciI, NdeII,
MvnI, AluI, MspI, BstUI,
and Sau96I. The digested products were electrophoresed on
chilled 3 to 5% Metaphor gels (FMC BioProducts). Gels containing
higher percentages of Metaphor were used for smaller fragments. Each
digestion was repeated at least twice to verify the patterns obtained.
Phylogenetic analysis.
The sizes and numbers of bands were
determined manually, and the results were used to calculate similarity
indices for each strain. Relationships were inferred from restriction
patterns by using both parsimony (PAUP) (18) and
distance-based (NT-SYS) methods.
Sequencing.
Amplification reactions were performed by using
the primers used for the RFLP analysis. The PCR products were ethanol
precipitated, resuspended in deionized water, and subjected to
double-stranded sequencing. Primers 1649F and 23S12R
(5'-TCCACCGTGTGCCCTTA-3'; synthesized for this study) were
used to determine the sequence of the IGS region. Taq dye
terminator chemistry was used to determine sequences with an ABI cycle
sequencer (Center for Gene Research and Biotechnology, Central Services
Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis).
Sequence data analysis.
All of the sequences obtained were
compared with sequences in the GenBank database by using BLAST
(1). The sequences were aligned by using the ASSEMBLE
CONTIGS option of the Genetic Data Environment (version 2.2) sequence
analysis software (provided by Steven Smith, Millipore Corp.,
Marlborough, Mass.). The alignment was optimized by manual adjustment.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The nucleotide
sequences determined in this study have been deposited in the GenBank
database under accession no. AF050760 to AF050768.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
The data suggested that there were some geographic and taxonomic
relationships between Ceanothus spp. and the
microsymbiont genus Frankia. These relationships were not as
clear as we anticipated, however.
PCR-RFLP analysis.
PCR amplification was successful with
nodular microsymbionts of the nine Ceanothus species
assayed. Only one 2,098-bp band was present after most amplification
reactions. Twelve different restriction enzymes were utilized.
HaeIII digestion resolved four distinct RFLP groups (Fig.
1). Digestion with HhaI,
HinFI, TaqI, RsaI, NciI,
NdeII, MvnI, AluI, MspI,
BstUI, and Sau96I separated the microsymbionts
into only two RFLP groups (data not shown). Only one RFLP group was
identified for all of the individual lobe tips from each plant
analyzed. Actually, except for sites A, D, and L, all of the lobe tips
from a given site assayed produced the same RFLP pattern (Fig.
2).

View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
PCR fingerprints generated after HaeIII
digestion of amplified sequences from uncultured microsymbionts of
Ceanothus spp. Lanes 1 and 13, 100-bp ladder; lanes
3 to 12, symbiotic Frankia strains obtained from
C. velutinus (site J), C. velutinus
(site E), C. thyrsiflorus, C. sanguineus, C. pumilus, C. prostratus, C. integerrimus, C. cuneatus, C. cordulatus, and C. americanus nodule DNA, respectively. Lane 2 contained the marker
pBR322:MspI. There are four different band patterns. The
pattern in lane 12 is the RFLP group I pattern; the pattern in lane 10 is the RFLP group II pattern; the pattern in lanes 3 and 5 is the RFLP
group III pattern; and the pattern in lanes 4, 6 to 9, and 11 is the
RFLP group IV pattern. All band patterns were verified by repeating
each digestion experiment a minimum of five times.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Map of Ceanothus sites as identified
by RFLP group. RFLP group I Frankia strains were collected
in Tennessee (site 1). Site 6 is the only place where RFLP group II
Frankia strains were collected. The shaded region in the
Willamette Valley of Oregon (sites AII, DI, I,
J, K, LII, and 7) contained Ceanothus
species exhibiting the RFLP group III Frankia pattern. RFLP
group IV Frankia strains were collected from
Ceanothus species growing in the unshaded region of
Oregon.
|
|
Data obtained with only 7 of the 12 enzymes (HaeIII,
HinFI, TaqI, NciI, NdeII,
AluI, and Sau96I) were used for analysis. We used
data only from digestions that generated clear, coherent band patterns,
which enabled us to quantify the number of bands and determine the
differences between samples. A total of 57 bands were generated with
the seven enzymes used, and each strain was scored either positive or
negative for each band. The resulting information was used to create a
similarity index (Table 2) and to perform
a cluster analysis (Fig. 3). The
dendrogram in Fig. 3 is consistent with the results of the parsimony
analysis (data not shown).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Dendrogram (as determined by the NT-SYS method) showing
the relationships of amplified 16S ribosomal DNA-23S ribosomal DNA
sequences based on the results of a PCR-RFLP analysis performed with
seven restriction endonucleases (HaeIII, HinFI,
TaqI, NciI, NdeII, AluI,
and Sau96I). Unless otherwise noted, the
Ceanothus species are members of the subgenus
Ceanothus.
|
|
We expected to find a taxonomic relationship between Frankia
strains and the host species that they infect; however, this was not
the case. There are two subgenera in the genus
Ceanothus, the subgenera
Ceanothus and Cerastes. We studied the
Frankia strains associated with nine species, six species
belonging to subgenus Ceanothus (C. americanus, C. cordulatus, C. integerrimus, C. sanguineus, C. thyrsiflorus, and C. velutinus) and three species
belonging to subgenus Cerastes (C. cuneatus,
C. prostratus, and C. pumilus). The
C. cuneatus-infective Frankia strains
belonged to a single group (RFLP group II); however, the
Frankia strains associated with the two other members of
subgenus Cerastes were members of RFLP group IV, which
includes Frankia strains obtained from nodules of members of
subgenus Ceanothus. Thus, there does not appear to
be a strong taxonomic relationship between the genus
Ceanothus and the genus Frankia at this
level of resolution.
The four RFLP groups did generally follow a geographic pattern (Fig.
2). RFLP group I contained Frankia strains obtained from C. americanus, the only plant species assayed outside
Oregon. The C. cuneatus-infective Frankia
strains (RFLP group II) and all members of RFLP group III were
collected in the Willamette Valley. RFLP group IV was the largest and
most wide-ranging group. The strains from six of the nine plant species
studied are members of this group. Many of the
Ceanothus-infective Frankia strains in
RFLP group IV were collected in the Cascades. The
Frankia strains obtained from C. velutinus
nodules collected in the mountainous areas of eastern Oregon, in
the Coast Range, and in the Siskiyous were also members of RFLP group IV.
The influence of geography was most evident when we evaluated the
C. velutinus-infective Frankia strains.
Interestingly, C. velutinus-infective
Frankia strains were members of both RFLP group III and RFLP
group IV. With the exception of strains obtained from three sites
(sites A, D, and L), all of the C. velutinus-infective Frankia strains collected in the Willamette Valley were
members of RFLP group III. The Frankia strains associated
with the plants collected at sites A, D, and L were not the same; some
of these strains were members of RFLP group III, and others were
members of RFLP group IV. These sites are on the boundary between the valley floor and the adjacent foothills. All of the other C. velutinus-infective Frankia strains were members of
RFLP group IV.
A number of environmental properties were characterized (Table
3). In a previous study, pH played a
significant role in determining what kind of Frankia strains
were present in Elaeagnus nodules (8). There did
not appear to be a relationship between pH and the Frankia
type present in this study, however. We did observe a trend in RFLP
type with elevation.
RFLP group IV Frankia strains were obtained from nodules
that were collected at a higher average elevation than the elevation at
which RFLP group III strains were collected (P < 0.1,
as determined by Student's t test) (Fig.
4). The elevation of the site with the
RFLP group II strains was significantly lower than the elevations of
the sites with RFLP group III or IV strains; however, there was only
one RFLP group II site. More samples containing RFLP group II strains
are needed to adequately evaluate the potential relationship between
elevation and RFLP group II Frankia strains.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Relationship between elevations of collection sites and
RFLP groups. Data were compiled for each of the 19 sites (RFLP group
II, 1 site; RFLP group III, 7 sites; RFLP group IV, 14 sites); 3 sites
had representatives belonging to two groups. The data for samples from
each RFLP group were averaged, and standard errors were calculated.
|
|
In two previous studies performed with rhizobia the workers also found
a correlation between elevation and nodule occupancy (11,
19). Bacterial strains are presumably affected by ecological factors determined by elevation, such as temperature and precipitation.
Other environmental features, such as soil type, soil classification,
and parent material, were assessed (Table 3). Qualitatively, there
did not appear to be a connection between any of these characteristics and the infective Frankia strains present.
The diversity of the Oregon Ceanothus-infective
strains appeared to be related to sample collection location rather
than to host taxonomy or to any of the environmental properties
measured. The differences that did exist among Frankia
strains assayed in Oregon were not great. These strains shared >91%
of all of the bands identified (Table 2). The differences that were
present were based only on HaeIII digestion results (the
results obtained with all of the other enzymes indicated that these
strains were identical) and consisted of the results for either one or
two restriction sites; there was one difference between the restriction sites of RFLP groups III and IV, there was one difference between the
restriction sites of RFLP groups II and III, and there were two
differences between the restriction sites of RFLP groups II and IV.
There was, however, a marked decrease in similarity (to 47 to 52%)
when the samples were compared with the microsymbionts associated with
C. americanus, a species found in the eastern United
States. The microsymbionts associated with C. americanus are very different from those that nodulate the Oregon species.
Prior to using the IGS region used in this study, we tried to
specifically amplify Frankia sequences located in the IGS
between nifD and nifK (8).
Unfortunately, we were able to amplify the sequences of only a subset
of our samples. The sequences that we were able to amplify (the
sequences of the C. americanus, C. thyrsiflorus, C. prostratus, C. cordulatus, and C. integerrimus microsymbionts)
were digested with two restriction endonucleases, HhaI and
HaeIII (data not shown). The results of this limited survey
were the same as the results obtained with the IGS region between
16S rRNA and 23S rRNA genes. It appeared that the same Frankia strain infected C. prostratus,
C. cordulatus, and C. integerrimus, whereas a different strain infected C. thyrsiflorus.
Again, the Frankia strains associated with C. americanus were markedly different than any strain found in Oregon.
Sequencing.
Because RFLP group IV contains
Frankia strains obtained from six of the nine
Ceanothus species sampled, we sequenced the
IGS between the 16S rRNA and 23S rRNA genes to confirm the
homogeneity of this group. Almost all of the members of RFLP group IV
had identical sequences; the only exceptions were the C. pumilus-infective Frankia strains. The C. pumilus-infective Frankia strains differed from the
rest of the strains in the group at 2 of 450 bases (level of
similarity, 99.6%). The exception of the C. pumilus-infective Frankia strains is not surprising
since C. pumilus grows only in a chemically unique
environment, serpentine soils.
The sequences of the C. cuneatus-infective
Frankia strains and the RFLP group IV strains differed by
three mismatches and two indels (level of similarity, 98.9%). There
was a difference of 22 nucleotides and 18 indels between the sequences
of the C. americanus-infective strains and the
RFLP group IV Frankia strains (level of similarity, 91.1%).
These differences between the sequences of the RFLP group IV strains
and the group RFLP II and I strains are consistent with the findings of
the PCR-RFLP analysis. Therefore, the sequencing results
verified the PCR-RFLP analysis results, suggesting that
RFLP group IV is quite homogeneous.
When the results of the PCR-RFLP analysis and the results of the
sequencing analysis were combined, the
Ceanothus-infective Frankia strains
could be separated into five groups. This is far less diversity than
previous workers have observed in
Ceanothus-infective Frankia strains
(2, 14) and other host-infective groups (7, 8,
17).
Rouvier et al. (17) used PCR-RFLP analysis to assess the
diversity of Casuarina and Allocasuarina
microsymbionts. They also examined the IGS regions in the ribosomal and
nif operons and found host specificity and high levels of
diversity among their symbionts. The method which they used allowed
them to assess strain level variations. In addition, the IGS between
the 16S rRNA and 23S rRNA genes has been used successfully to
characterize strains of other microbes, such as Escherichia
coli and Nitrobacter spp. (5, 15).
Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that if there were high levels of
diversity among Oregon Ceanothus microsymbionts, we
would have been able to detect them with this method.
There are a few reasons why previous studies may have found more
diversity than we did. One reason may be that we examined only limited
regions of the genome (the ribosomal operon and nifDK with
limited success). Murry et al. (14) assessed the entire genome by using REP-PCR methods, and it is possible that we would have
found greater diversity if we had assessed the entire genome. In
subsequent work in our laboratory, workers have used REP-PCR methods to
assess the population level diversity of Frankia strains in
C. prostratus-C. velutinus, C. integerrimus-C. sanguineus, and C. velutinus-C. integerrimus copopulations (10).
These workers found eight different patterns in 10 nodules; however,
many of the patterns were quite similar. The differences observed among different sites were often greater than the differences between infected plant species at a given site, which is consistent with our
finding that some factor besides host plant taxonomy dictates which
Frankia type is present.
A second potential reason for the discrepancy between diversity levels
is the possibility that the Ceanothus microsymbionts assayed by Murry et al. (14) may have been much different
than the microsymbionts which we studied. We characterized some of the
Ceanothus microsymbionts used in this study by using
full-length 16S rRNA sequences (16) and found that our
Ceanothus-infective Frankia strains were
much different than the strains studied by Murry et al. (14)
and were more similar to the strains studied by Benson et al.
(3).
Third, Murry et al. (14) assessed the diversity of
Ceanothus symbionts in southern California, which
harbors a greater diversity of Ceanothus spp. More
than 40 species of Ceanothus are endemic to
California, which is believed to be the center of distribution of the
genus (12). Thus, the greater diversity of the
Ceanothus microsymbionts characterized by Murry et
al. (14) may be related to the greater diversity of
actinorhizal hosts in southern California.
The results obtained with two different methods (PCR-RFLP
analysis and sequencing) and two different locations on the
genome (16S rRNA-23S rRNA and nifDK) lead us to conclude
that there is little genetic diversity in the Frankia
strains that infect Oregon Ceanothus species and
that C. americanus microsymbionts are considerably different than Oregon microsymbionts. The limited diversity that is
present is not related to plant taxonomy or any known environmental condition. More samples and potentially more discriminatory methods may
be needed to further clarify the diversity of Frankia
strains associated with Ceanothus species.
We thank Katharine Field, Ena Urbach, and Soon-Chun Jeong for
their advice and criticisms; Beth Mullin for providing nodules; and the
staff at the Oregon State University Herbarium and Central Services
Laboratory for their assistance.
This research was supported by USDA-NRICGP grant 93-60017860-A4.
| 1.
|
Altschul, S. F.,
W. Gish,
W. Miller,
E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman.
1990.
Basic local alignment search tool.
J. Mol. Biol.
215:403-410[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Baker, D. D., and B. C. Mullin.
1994.
Diversity of Frankia nodule endophytes of the actinorhizal shrub Ceanothus as assessed by RFLP patterns from single nodule lobes.
Soil Biol. Biochem.
26:547-552.
|
| 3.
|
Benson, D. R.,
D. W. Stephens,
M. L. Clawson, and W. B. Silvester.
1996.
Amplification of 16S rRNA genes from Frankia strains in root nodules of Ceanothus griseus, Coriaria arborea, Coriaria plumosa, Discaria toumatou, and Purshia tridentata.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
62:2904-2909[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Conrad, S. G.,
A. E. Jaramillo,
K. Cromack, Jr., and S. Rose.
1985.
The role of the genus Ceanothus in western forest ecosystems. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-182.
Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oreg.
|
| 5.
|
García-Martínez, J.,
A. Martínez-Murcia,
A. I. Antón, and F. Rodríguez-Valera.
1996.
Comparison of the small 16S to 23S intergenic spacer region of the rRNA operons of some Escherichia coli strains of the ECOR collection and Escherichia coli K-12.
J. Bacteriol.
178:6374-6377[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Hönerlage, W.,
D. Hahn,
K. Zepp,
J. Zeyer, and P. Normand.
1994.
A hypervariable 23S rRNA region provides a discriminating target for specific characterization of uncultured and cultured Frankia.
Syst. Appl. Microbiol.
17:433-443.
|
| 7.
|
Jamann, S.,
M. P. Fernendez, and A. Moiroud.
1992.
Genetic diversity of Elaeagnaceae-infective Frankia strains isolated from various soils.
Acta col.
13:395-406.
|
| 8.
|
Jamann, S.,
M. P. Fernendez, and P. Normand.
1993.
Typing method for N2-fixing bacteria based on PCR-RFLP analysis application to the characterization of Frankia strains.
Mol. Ecol.
2:17-26[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Jeong, S.-C.,
A. Liston, and D. D. Myrold.
1997.
Molecular phylogeny of the genus Ceanothus using ndhF and rbcL sequences.
Theor. Appl. Genet.
94:852-857.
|
| 10.
| Jeong, S.-C., A. Liston, and D. D. Myrold. Specific genomic fingerprinting of microsymbiont
Frankia from Ceanothus copopulations
using repetitive sequences and PCR. Submitted for publication.
|
| 11.
|
Mahler, R. L., and D. F. Bezdicek.
1980.
Distribution of Rhizobium leguminosarium in peas in the Palouse of eastern Washington.
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.
44:292-295.
|
| 12.
|
McMinn, H. E.
1942.
Ceanothus vol. II: a systematic study of the genus Ceanothus.
Santa Barbara Botanical Garden, Santa Barbara, Calif.
|
| 13.
|
Mirza, M. S.
1993.
Characterization of uncultured Frankia strains by 16S rRNA sequence analysis. Ph.D. thesis.
Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
|
| 14.
|
Murry, M. A.,
A. S. Konopka,
S. D. Pratt, and T. L. Vandergon.
1997.
The use of PCR-based typing methods to assess the diversity of Frankia nodule endophytes of the actinorhizal shrub Ceanothus.
Physiol. Plant.
99:714-721.
|
| 15.
|
Navarro, E.,
P. Simonet,
P. Normand, and R. Bardin.
1992.
Characterization of natural populations of Nitrobacter spp. using PCR/RFLP analysis of the ribosomal intergenic spacer.
Arch. Microbiol.
157:107-115[Medline].
|
| 16.
| Ritchie, N. J., and David D. Myrold.
Phylogenetic placement of uncultured Ceanothus
microsymbionts using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Can. J. Bot., in press.
|
| 17.
|
Rouvier, C.,
Y. Prin,
P. Reddell,
P. Normand, and P. Simonet.
1996.
Genetic diversity among Frankia strains nodulating members of the family Casuarinaceae in Australia revealed by PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis with crushed nodules.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
62:979-985[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Swofford, D. L.
1991.
PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.0.
Illinois National History Survey, Champaign.
|
| 19.
|
Woomer, P.,
P. W. Singleton, and B. B. Bohlool.
1988.
Ecological indicators of native rhizobia in tropical soils.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
54:1112-1116[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
| Yaeger, C., and D. D. Myrold. 1996. Unpublished data.
|