Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 1999, p. 1789-1793, Vol. 65, No. 4
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Effects of Nickel and Cobalt on Kinetics of
Methanol Conversion by Methanogenic Sludge as Assessed by On-Line
CH4 Monitoring
Graciela
Gonzalez-Gil,*
Robbert
Kleerebezem, and
Gatze
Lettinga
Department of Agricultural, Environmental and
Systems Technology, Subdepartment of Environmental Technology,
Wageningen Agricultural University, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands
Received 10 August 1998/Accepted 12 January 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
When metals were added in a pulse mode to
methylotrophic-methanogenic biomass, three methane production rate
phases were recognized. Increased concentrations of Ni and Co
accelerated the initial exponential and final arithmetic increases in
the methane production rate and reduced the temporary decrease in the
rate. When Ni and Co were added continuously, the temporary decrease
phase was eliminated and the exponential production rate increased. We
hypothesize that the temporary decrease in the methane production rate
and the final arithmetic increase in the methane production rate were due to micronutrient limitations and that the precipitation-dissolution kinetics of metal sulfides may play a key role in the biovailability of
these compounds.
 |
TEXT |
Previous research (7, 19, 25,
27) has shown that metal deficiencies can limit the performance
of anaerobic digestion systems and that metal supplementation may
substantially improve the performance of such systems. In particular,
the benefits of nutrient supplements during methanization of industrial
wastewaters have been recognized (26, 27).
Methanogenesis from methanol is known to proceed by the following
pathways: (i) methanol can be directly converted to methane by
methylotrophs, (ii) methanol can be converted with bicarbonate to
acetate by acetogens, and the acetate can be metabolized by acetoclastic methanogens, and (iii) methanol can be converted to
H2 and CO2, which can be used by
hydrogenophilic methanogens and/or acetogens to form methane and
acetate, respectively (7). Methanosarcina type
bacteria are responsible for direct conversion of methanol to methane,
and Ni, Co, and Fe are components of the enzymes that catalyze many of
the reactions of this methylotrophic pathway (4, 5, 10, 12,
28). It has been reported that metal supplementation may
substantially improve anaerobic treatment of different types of waste
streams (8, 9, 20, 27). However, the previously described
metal additions that are optimal vary by several orders of magnitude
(29). Furthermore, previously published information
concerning the relationship between kinetic data and "optimum"
metal concentrations is rather unclear. This is illustrated by the fact
that for similar batch systems, the metal (Ni or Co) doses can vary
from 0 to 40 µM (16, 21-23).
Since methanol-consuming methanogens have specific trace metal
requirements and since many industrial waste streams contain methanol
as an important contaminant, in the present study we examined the
kinetics of methanol consumption by methanogenic biomass in the
presence of different Ni and Co concentrations.
Anaerobic granular sludge from a full-scale expanded granular sludge
bed, a Biobed EGSB reactor (location, Caldic Europort) developed by
Biothane Systems (Delft, The Netherlands), was used. The sludge
treated wastewater generated during production of formaldehyde. The
waste stream contained primarily methanol and formaldehyde as organic
substrates (30). To prevent mass transfer limitations, the
granular structure was disrupted with a blender, and the sludge suspension obtained was used as the inoculum. The initial concentration of the inoculum expressed as the amount of volatile suspended solids
(VSS) in the reactor, was 1.5 g liter
1. The standard
medium used contained the following components: 15 mM
NH4Cl, 7 mM KH2PO4, 4 mM
MgSO4, 5 mM CaCl2, and 35.74 mM NaHCO3. This medium also contained yeast extract (100 mg/liter) and trace elements, which were present at the following
concentrations: H3BO3, 4.03 µM;
ZnCl2, 1.84 µM; CuCl2, 1.11 µM;
MnCl2, 12.63 µM; (NH4)6Mo7O24, 0.2 µM;
AlCl3, 1.86 µM; Na2SeO3, 3.12 µM; and FeCl2, 50 µM. Ni and Co were added as
NiCl2 and CoCl2, respectively, at the
concentrations indicated below. Methanol was used as the carbon source
at an initial concentration of 208 mM (10 g of chemical oxygen demand
[COD] per liter). The pH in each reactor during the experimental
period was 7 to 7.2. All chemicals were analytical grade, and most
chemicals were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany); yeast extract
was purchased from Oxoid Unipath Ltd. (Hampshire, England).
The reactors used were completely stirred plastic vessels. They were
filled with 2.5 liters of mineral medium and flushed with a 70%
N2-30% CO2 mixture for 20 min, after which
Na2S · 8H2O was added to a final
concentration of 0.54 mM; finally, Ni and/or Co was added. After a 24-h
period, in which we assumed that chemical equilibrium was established,
the inoculum and methanol were added. The reactors were operated in
batch mode in a temperature-controlled (30 ± 1°C) room. The
biogas produced was passed through an Erlenmeyer flask filled with a
20% NaOH solution and then through a tube filled with soda lime
pellets with thymol blue indicator. Finally, the gas was passed through
a Mariotte flask system containing water for quantification of methane
production. The methane produced was monitored continuously by
measuring the weight of the displaced water with a pressure sensor
(model QB 745; DS-Europe) connected to a programmable data logger
system (model CR10; Campbell). The data were recorded every 10 s
and were averaged over a 30-min interval. A personal computer
programmed to function as a terminal emulator was used to communicate
with the data logger. All assays were performed in duplicate.
To assess the main pathway of methanol conversion, methane production
by the biomass during degradation of methanol was monitored in 250-ml
serum bottles by adding specific inhibitors to 100 ml of the reaction
medium in order to block different metabolic routes (6). The
inhibitors used were bromoethanesulfonic acid and vancomycin, which
were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo.) and Janssen
(Tilburg, The Netherlands), respectively. The biomass added (previously
activated with methanol) contained 0.8 g of VSS
liter
1; methanol and inhibitors were added at
concentrations of 31 and 50 mM, respectively. The methanol, methane,
volatile fatty acids (VFA), and hydrogen in the headspace were measured
during the experiment. H2 and CH4 contents were
determined as previously described (6). VFA and methanol
contents were analyzed by the method of Kortekaas et al.
(11), except that for methanol the temperature of the oven
was 70°C. A spectrophotometric method (2) was used to
routinely analyze preparations for the presence of formaldehyde. VSS
contents were determined by standard methods (1). Granule
samples were prepared and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy as
described previously (29).
The equilibrium concentrations of dissolved and precipitated species
were calculated with a chemical equilibrium program written in Turbo
Pascal. Phosphate, carbonate, and sulfide species, including metal
sulfide complexes, were included. The input concentrations were the
concentrations in the standard medium used. The mass balances and
reaction equations were solved iteratively by using the Newton-Raphson
method. Most of the equilibrium constants were obtained from reference
24; the metal sulfide complex constants were
obtained from reference 15.
Scanning electron microscopy observations showed that the predominant
bacteria in the sludge were Methanosarcina type bacteria. This was confirmed by assessing the main metabolic route of methanol degradation. The results indicated that methanol was converted via
direct methanogenesis and that methane formation through acetate or
H2-CO2 did not play an important role.
The kinetics of methanogenesis from methanol in the sludge were
characterized by the following three phases: (i) an exponentially increasing rate (phase I), (ii) a temporary decrease in the rate (phase
II), and (iii) an additional arithmetic increase in the rate (phase
III) (Fig. 1). A possible explanation for
the decrease in the rate was that the biomass was micronutrient
limited. Hence, experiments with different Co and Ni additions were
performed.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Methane production rate curve for methanol-degrading
sludge. The following three phases were distinguished: (i) an
exponential methane production rate (phase I), (ii) a decrease in the
rate (phase II), and (iii) an additional arithmetic increase in the
rate (phase III). Ni and Co were each added at a concentration of 1 µM.
|
|
Either Ni or Co was added at a concentrations of 0, 4, 40, and 400 µM, while the other metal was added at a concentration of 40 µM.
All of the curves showed that there was a decrease in the methane
production rate after approximately 40 h (Fig.
2A and B). However, as the concentration
of Co increased, the size of the temporary decrease in the methane
production rate decreased and the slope of the arithmetic increase
became greater (Fig. 2A). On the other hand, nickel concentrations of 4 and 40 µM increased the methane production rate during phase I (Fig.
2B). Furthermore, it seemed that nickel affected phase I most, whereas
cobalt affected phase III most. However, in contrast to the cobalt
experiments, addition of 400 µM nickel was inhibitory.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Methane production rate curves obtained with methanol.
(A) Different initial Co concentrations. In all cases Ni was added at a
concentration of 40 µM. (B) Different initial Ni concentrations. In
all cases Co was added at a concentration of 40 µM. (C) Different Ni
and Co concentrations added simultaneously. (D) Continuous addition of
Ni and Co during methanol degradation. Different rates of addition were
tested. The arrow indicates when the metals were first added. The rates
at which the metals were added were 0 µmol h 1 (line
a), 0.05 µmol h 1 (line b), 0.2 µmol h 1 (line c), and 2 µmol
h 1 (line d).
|
|
Additions containing Ni plus Co were also tested. These micronutrients
were simultaneously added at concentrations of 0, 1, 4, and 40 µM
each. As in the previous experiments, the metals were added 24 h
prior to inoculation. The results (Fig. 2C) clearly demonstrated that
metal bioavailability was limited since as the amount of metal
increased, the exponential growth during phase I increased, the
temporary decrease in phase II was less pronounced, and the arithmetic
rate of increase during phase III was faster. However, the observed
limitations were not completely eliminated even with metals
concentrations as high as 40 µM Ni and 40 µM Co. Therefore,
continuous addition of the metals was studied to see whether
micronutrient limitations could be overcome.
Co and Ni were added continuously at rates of 0, 0.05, 0.2, and 2 µmol h
1; hence, the concentrations in the reactor after
50 h of addition or an 80-h experimental period (the first doses
were added after 30 h) were 0, 1, 4, and 40 µM, respectively.
The results of this test are shown in Fig. 2D.
Doses of 0.05 and 0.2 µmol h
1 (1 and 4 µM,
respectively) seemed to eliminate limitations, and the previously
observed decrease in the methane production rate during phase II was
not observed in these experiments. Also, the period of exponential
increases in the methane production rate was extended. However, a dose
of 2 µmol h
1 (40 µM) appeared to be inhibitory.
Rate curves having the shape shown in Fig. 1 and 2A to C can reflect
either (i) limitations due to substrate or nutrient depletion or (ii)
production of a toxic compound. The temporary decrease in the methane
production rate could not be attributed to substrate limitations since
in all cases the methanol concentration at 40 h was more than
3,000 mg of COD liter
1 and the reported apparent
substrate affinity coefficient (Ks) for
methylotrophic methanogens was 12 mg of COD liter
1
(6). Possible limitations due to the production of
formaldehyde, which is a toxic compound and an intermediate (at the
oxidation level) during the oxidation of methanol (10), were
not detected. Furthermore, the limitations could not be attributed to
macronutrient limitations since in separate experiments performed with
different amounts of macronutrients the methane production rate was not affected (data not shown).
Spiked addition of metals.
The results of this work clearly
show that the biomass was nickel and cobalt limited. Two main
theoretical aspects should be considered in order to understand the
limitations observed. (i) Assuming that Methanosarcina
barkeri Fusaro cells grown on methanol contained 0.135 and 0.06 mg
of Ni and Co per g of cells, respectively (18), and that the
yield was 0.088 g of cells/g of methanol COD (23), then 2 µM Ni and 0.89 µM Co would be required for conversion of the
10 g of methanol COD liter
1 added in the experiments
(Table 1). According to this reasoning, addition of more than 2 µM metal should fulfill the nutrient
requirements. However, as the spiked dose experiments showed, this was
not the case, and the metals added (>2 µM) seemed to be not
available for biomass since limitations were still observed. (ii) If it is assumed that there is chemical equilibrium, then the following trends can be expected: the calculated concentrations of free Ni and Co
should increase sharply only when the initial dose of Ni and the
initial dose of Co are more than 100 µM, corresponding to the moment
that the amount of sulfide added becomes limiting for precipitation
reactions (Fig. 3). Although metal
sulfide complexes may be important soluble species at pH values greater
than 7 (15), at metal concentrations below 100 µM the
concentrations of dissolved metals that occur as (i) free metals
(M2+), as well as and the concentrations of (ii) free metal
plus sulfide complexes (MHS+), should be less than 0.01 and
0.05 µM, respectively (Fig. 3). If dissolution of the precipitated
metals were negligible, these concentrations of dissolved metals would
not fulfill the nutrient requirements, as indicated in Table 1.
Therefore, we concluded that metal shortage must have been compensated
for by dissolution of precipitated metal sulfides.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Calculated equilibrium dissolved metal concentrations
with different initial doses of Ni and Co.
|
|
Based on these considerations, the general trend in the methane
production rate (Fig. 1) can be explained as follows. During the first
30 to 40 h of the process (phase I), readily dissolved precipitates provide the required nutrients, which results in an
exponential increase in the methane production rate of the methylotrophic population. However, if the metal uptake rate is higher
than the rate of dissolution, then metal-limited conditions for the
bacteria prevail. This situation occurred during phase III, when the
growth rate increased arithmetically; this increase was determined
by the rate of dissolution of metal sulfides. The temporary decrease in
the methane production rate (phase II) may have been due to severe
metal limitation that was even greater than that in phase III,
suggesting that in addition to bacterial growth the specific methane
conversion rate is affected by limiting concentrations of Co and/or Ni.
It should be noted that different types of precipitates of the same
metal can be present in a system (some compounds dissolve faster than
others) and that the dissolution rate of a specific metal sulfide may
not be constant since it depends on the total surface area.
Continuous addition of metals.
Nutrient limitations can be
overcome if the essential metals are added continuously at a proper
rate so that their availabilities in solution can fulfill the
requirement for biomass activity and growth. The results obtained in
the continuous addition experiments clearly show this effect and thus
indicate the importance of the dissolution rate kinetics of metal
sulfide precipitates in anaerobic digestion processes.
When the metals were added continuously at a rates of 0.05 to 0.2 µmol h
1, the temporary decrease in the methane
production rate was eliminated and the period of exponential production
was extended (Fig. 2D). These rates of addition corresponded to metal
concentrations of 1 to 4 µM and agree well with the calculated metal
requirements based on the biomass yield and Ni and Co contents of
biomass (Table 1) for Methanosarcina spp. grown on methanol.
Other studies have also shown that when essential nutrients are added
continuously in fed batch systems, the period of exponential growth of
M. barkeri is drastically extended compared to a system in
which nutrients are added in one dose (17). Thus, when the
amount of substrate is not limiting, metal dissolution might become the
rate-limiting step.
Practical implications.
During operation of a continuous
reactor, less metal may be required than the amount required in a batch
system, because more biological ligands may be produced (3, 13,
14) and because continuous addition of nutrients ensures free
metal availability for biomass uptake. In practice, in view of the
clear evidence that supplying metal enhances the treatment of several
effluents, there is a tendency to add nutrients in excessive amounts.
This could lead to inhibitory effects on the biomass and/or to metal accumulation in the sludge. Hence, in order to determine a more rational way to add essential metals, studies to understand the process
kinetics of precipitation and dissolution in anaerobic systems in
combination with the kinetics of nutrient uptake by the microorganisms
are necessary. In this paper we show that a rational supply of metals
can be achieved, which in turn may open the possibility of either
enhancing or diminishing the production of biomass depending on the
treatment and remediation needs.
On-line CH4 monitoring.
With on-line measurements
of methane production very detailed kinetic information can be
obtained. To our knowledge, there are no previous reports of kinetic
data being analyzed by on-line measurement of the CH4
production rate. Furthermore, the informative value of the results can
be maximized when rate-time curves are plotted instead of cumulative
curves for CH4 production.
Accurate rate data can be obtained only by on-line measurements. The
observed decrease and subsequent increase in the rate (Fig. 1, phase
II) would have been overlooked with cumulative plots or may have been
treated as an analytical error.
Finally, although kinetic data are commonly assessed by assuming that
only carbon is limited, discrepancies in previously reported kinetic
constants could be due to nutrient limitations in batch experiments, as
shown in this study. This suggests that straightforward comparisons of
previously published kinetic parameter data are not possible.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Merle de Kreuk for help during experimental work and
Herman van Leeuwen and Jim Field for valuable discussions.
This work was supported by Biothane Systems International, Delft, The Netherlands.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Agricultural, Environmental and Systems Technology, Subdepartment of Environmental Technology, Wageningen Agricultural University, Bomenweg 2, P.O. Box 8129, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-317483432. Fax: 31-317482108. E-mail:
graciela.gonzalez{at}algemeen.mt.wau.nl.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
American Public Health Association.
1985.
Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, 16th ed.
American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
|
| 2.
|
Bailey, B. W., and J. M. Rankin.
1971.
New spectrophotometric method for determination of formaldehyde.
Anal. Chem.
43:782-784[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Becker, U., and S. Peiffer.
1997.
Heavy-metal ion complexation by particulate matter in the leachate of solid waste: a multi-method approach.
J. Contam. Hydrol.
24:313-344.
|
| 4.
|
Deppemier, U.,
V. Müller, and G. Gottschalk.
1996.
Pathways of energy conservation in methanogenic archaea.
Arch. Microbiol.
165:149-163.
|
| 5.
|
Diekert, G.,
U. Konheiser,
K. Piechulla, and R. K. Thauer.
1981.
Nickel requirement and factor F430 content of methanogenic bacteria.
J. Bacteriol.
148:459-464[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Florencio, L.,
A. J. Field, and G. Lettinga.
1994.
The importance of cobalt for individual trophic groups in an anaerobic methanol-degrading consortium.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
60:227-234[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Florencio, L.,
P. Jenicek,
A. J. Field, and G. Lettinga.
1993.
Effect of cobalt on the anaerobic degradation of methanol.
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
75:368-374.
|
| 8.
|
Hoban, D. J., and L. van den Berg.
1979.
Effect of iron on conversion of acetic acid to methane during methanogenic fermentations.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
47:153-159[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Kelly, C. R., and M. S. Switzenbaum.
1984.
Anaerobic treatment: temperature and nutrient effects.
Agric. Wastes
10:135-154.
|
| 10.
|
Keltjens, J. T., and C. van der Drift.
1986.
Electron transfer reactions in methanogens.
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
39:259-303.
|
| 11.
|
Kortekaas, S.,
G. Vidal,
H. Yan-Ling,
G. Lettinga, and J. A. Field.
1998.
Anaerobic-aerobic treatment of toxic pulping black liquor with upfront effluent recirculation.
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
86:97-110.
|
| 12.
|
Kräutler, B.
1990.
Chemistry of methylcorrinoids related to their roles in bacterial C1 metabolism.
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
87:349-354.
|
| 13.
|
Kuo, W. C., and G. F. Parkin.
1996.
Characterization of soluble microbial products from anaerobic treatment by molecular weight distribution and nickel-chelating properties.
Water Res.
30:915-922.
|
| 14.
|
LaPaglia, C., and P. L. Hartzell.
1997.
Stress-induced production of biofilm in the hyperthermophile Archaeoglobus fulgidus.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63:3158-3163[Abstract].
|
| 15.
|
Luther, G. W.,
D. T. Rickard,
S. Theberge, and A. Olroyd.
1996.
Determination of metal (bi)sulfide stability constants of Mn2+, Fe2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+ by voltammetric methods.
Environ. Sci. Technol.
30:671-679.
|
| 16.
|
Maestrojuán, G. M., and D. R. Boone.
1991.
Characterization of Methanosarcina barkeri MST and 227, Methanosarcina mazei S-6T, and Methanosarcina vacuolata Z-761T.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
41:267-274[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Nishio, N.,
T. Kakizono,
R. G. Silveira,
S. Takemoto, and S. Nagai.
1992.
Nutrient control by the gas evolution in methanogenesis of methanol by Methanosarcina barkeri.
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
73:481-485.
|
| 18.
|
Scherer, P.,
H. Lippert, and G. Wolff.
1983.
Composition of the major elements and trace elements of 10 methanogenic bacteria determined by inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry.
Biol. Trace Element Res.
5:149-163.
|
| 19.
|
Scherer, P., and H. Sahm.
1981.
Effect of trace elements and vitamins on the growth of Methanosarcina barkeri.
Acta Biotechnol.
1:57-65.
|
| 20.
|
Shen, C. F.,
N. Korsaric, and R. Blaszczyk.
1993.
Properties of anaerobic granular sludge as affected by yeast extract, cobalt and iron supplements.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
39:132-137.
|
| 21.
|
Silveira, R. G.,
T. Kakizono,
S. Takemoto,
N. Nishio, and S. Nagai.
1991.
Medium optimization by an orthogonal array design for the growth of Methanosarcina barkeri.
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
72:20-25.
|
| 22.
|
Silveira, R. G.,
N. Nishio, and S. Nagai.
1991.
Growth characteristics and corrinoid production of Methanosarcina barkeri on methanol-acetate medium.
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
71:28-34.
|
| 23.
|
Smith, M. R., and R. A. Mah.
1978.
Growth and methanogenesis by Methanosarcina strain 227 on acetate and methanol.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
36:870-879[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Smith, R. M., and A. E. Martell.
1976.
Critical stability constants, vol. 4. Inorganic complexes.
Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 25.
|
Speece, R. E.,
G. F. Parkin, and D. Gallagher.
1983.
Nickel stimulation of anaerobic digestion.
Water Res.
17:677-683.
|
| 26.
|
Speece, R. E.,
G. F. Parkin,
S. Bhattacharya, and M. Takashima.
1986.
Trace nutrient requirements of anaerobic digestion, p. 177-188.
In
Proceedings of the European Water Pollution Control Association Conference on Anaerobic Waste Water Treatment 1986. Industrial Presentations B. V., Schiedam, The Netherlands.
|
| 27.
|
Takashima, M., and R. E. Speece.
1990.
Mineral requirements for methane fermentation.
Crit. Rev. Environ. Control
19:465-479.
|
| 28.
|
Thauer, R.
1997.
Biodiversity and unity in biochemistry.
Antonie Leeuwenhoek
71:21-32.
|
| 29.
|
van Houten, R. T.,
S. J. W. H. Oude-Elferink,
S. E. van Hamel,
L. W. Hulshoff Pol, and G. Lettinga.
1995.
Sulphate reduction by aggregates of sulphate reducing bacteria and homo-acetogenic bacteria in a lab-scale gas-lift reactor.
Biores. Technol.
54:73-79.
|
| 30.
|
Zoutberg, G. R., and P. de Been.
1997.
The biobed EGSB (expanded granular sludge bed) system covers shortcomings of the upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor in the chemical industry.
Water Sci. Technol.
35:183-188.
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 1999, p. 1789-1793, Vol. 65, No. 4
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.