Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 1999, p. 3261-3263, Vol. 65, No. 7
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Development of Bacterial Contamination during
Production of Yeast Extracts
Julie
Barrette,1
Claude P.
Champagne,2,* and
Jacques
Goulet1
Département des Sciences des Aliments
et de Nutrition, Université Laval, Québec, Québec G1K
7P4,1 and Food Research and Development
Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, St. Hyacinthe, Québec
J2S 8E3,2 Canada
Received 21 October 1998/Accepted 23 April 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Baker's yeast suspensions having bacterial populations of
106 and 108 CFU/ml were subjected to autolysis
processes designed to obtain yeast extracts (YE). The bacterial
contaminants added to the yeast cell suspensions were produced with
spent broths obtained from a commercial yeast production plant and
contained 59% cocci (Leuconostoc, Aerococcus,
Lactococcus) as well as 41% bacilli
(Bacillus). Autolyses were conducted at four different pH
levels (4.0, 5.5, 7.0, and 8.5) and with two autolysis-promoting agents
(ethyl acetate and chitosan). Processing parameters were more important
than the initial bacterial population in the development of
contaminating bacteria during manufacture of YE. Drops in the viable
bacterial population after a 24-h autolysis were observed when pH was
adjusted to 4.0 or when ethyl acetate was added. A significant
interaction was found between the effects of pH and autolysis promoters
on the bacterial population in YE, indicating that the activity of ethyl acetate, as opposed to that of chitosan, was not influenced by pH.
 |
TEXT |
Yeast extracts (YE) are used as
ingredients in foods as well as in microbiological growth media.
Various methods can be used to produce YE (11). Although it
is possible to produce them without the use of autolysis promoters
(7), increased production yields are achieved with enzymatic
(11, 12), mechanical (2, 13), or chemical
(4, 10, 11) treatments.
A number of studies have reported on yeast autolysis and YE production
(1, 9, 18), but none has examined the effects of processing
parameters on the development of bacterial contaminants in the yeast
suspension during the YE manufacturing process. Industrial production
of baker's yeast biomass is carried out in large fermentation units
(>300 m3), which makes it almost impossible to avoid some
form of microbial contamination, and the presence of lactic acid
bacteria has been reported (8, 16, 17). There is thus a need
to evaluate the effects of YE processing conditions on the development
of contaminating bacteria in order to ensure the microbiological quality of YE.
The aim of this study was to inoculate bacterial contaminants into
industrial baker's yeast cell suspensions and to evaluate the effects
of autolysis promoters, pH, and bacterial density on their development
during the production of YE.
Yeast.
For commercial baker's yeast, lots (40 liters each)
were obtained from a yeast factory. Each lot, containing approximately 18% dry substance, was divided into 1-liter portions and frozen at
20°C. Sixteen hours prior to autolysis, the 1-liter units of yeast
suspension were thawed at 4°C. Preliminary studies showed that
freezing the yeast suspension for 1 month at
18°C generated initial
lysis but did not have a significant effect on the 24-h autolysis yield
(Fig. 1).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Effect of freezing of baker's yeast suspension on the
appearance of soluble solids during subsequent autolysis. Yield is
expressed as percentages of total solids that became soluble.
|
|
Bacterial contaminants. (i) Production of high-density bacterial
suspensions of contaminating bacteria.
Bacterial contamination of
yeast suspensions was 106 CFU/ml. The experimental plan was
also designed to study the impact of a very high level of bacterial
contaminants, 108 CFU/ml of yeast suspension. To achieve
such a level of bacterial contamination, a bacterial biomass production
step was necessary. The biomass was produced in a solution of 111 ml of
cane molasses (45°Brix), 10 g of YE (Oxoid), 10 ml of
cycloheximide (Acti-Dione; Omega Inc., Lévis, Québec,
Canada) (0.1% stock solution), and 879 ml of spent broth placed in a
2-liter fermentor (Biostat M; Braun, Melsungen, Germany). The
molasses-YE solution was previously sterilized at 121°C for 15 min.
Cycloheximide was included to prevent the development of yeast present
in the fermentation medium. Fermentation was carried out at 30°C for
24 h, with agitation at 100 rpm and aeration at 0.1 volume of air
per volume of growth medium per min. The pH was controlled at 5.5 with
5 N H2SO4 and 5 N NaOH. These conditions were
designed to simulate conditions of baker's yeast production (medium,
aeration, pH). After this 24-h fermentation, cells were harvested by
centrifugation at 5,600 × g (Beckman JA-10 rotor) for
25 min at 4°C. The cell pellet was resuspended in a 10% solution of
sterile glycerol (Aldrich Chemical Company Inc., Milwaukee, Wis.) at
1/10 of the original volume. This high-density bacterial suspension was
divided into 15-ml fractions and frozen at
40°C without delay.
(ii) Isolation.
Samples from bacterial suspensions were
diluted in sterile peptone (0.1%)-water; plated on PCA, M17, and MRS
agars (Difco, Detroit, Mich.); and incubated at 30°C for 48 h.
Colonies from each lot were chosen randomly and subcultured twice prior
to a microscopic purity check.
(iii) Strain storage.
All isolates were grown on MRS agar
slants (duplicate) covered with sterile mineral oil (previously heated
at 150°C for 6 h). The samples were stored at 4°C.
(iv) Characterization and identification.
Gram staining, spore
staining, and oxidase testing were carried out as described previously
(14). Production of lactic and acetic acids, as well as of
ethanol, was determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography
(6) following growth in a medium composed of 2% glucose,
0.5% peptone, 0.5% YE, and 0.3% potassium phosphate. Identification
of bacterial isolates was attempted with the API 50 CH, API 20 STREP,
API 20E (BioMérieux Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.), and Biolog (GP
Microplate and MicroStation System, version 3.50; Biolog Inc., Hayward,
Calif.) commercial kits. The tests were performed according to the
instructions of the manufacturers.
Bacterial enumerations.
Total bacterial population was
estimated by plating peptone (0.1%)-water dilutions on a PCA medium
(Difco) supplemented with cycloheximide (0.001%). Plates were
incubated at 30°C for 48 h.
Autolysis.
Three process parameters were modified for the
production of YE: autolysis promoters (ethyl acetate [1.5%],
chitosan [0.2%], and negative control), pH (4.0, 5.5, 7.0, and 8.5),
and the presence of contaminating subcultured bacteria from spent yeast
broths (108 CFU/ml). A random experimental plan was
designed and applied with four identical Biostat M (Braun) fermentors;
four independent assays were conducted, each treatment being applied
once in each fermentation unit to avoid a fermentor effect.
(i) General procedure.
Glass jars were sterilized (autoclaved
at 121°C for 35 min). Under aseptic conditions, 1 liter of thawed
(24°C) yeast suspension was added to the jar, along with the
autolysis promoter and contaminants if required. Constant agitation
(100 rpm), temperature (48°C), and pH were maintained during
autolysis. Following 24 h of incubation under these conditions, a
sample of autolysate (10 ml) was taken for bacterial enumeration.
(ii) Autolysis with ethyl acetate.
Ethyl acetate (15 ml) was
added to the yeast suspension, and the mixture was incubated as for the
general (control) procedure.
(iii) Autolysis with chitosan.
The chitosan autolysis method
was adapted from the patent of Origane and Sato (10). A
stock solution of 4% shrimp chitosan (Alpha-Biotech 2000, Québec, Canada) was prepared with glacial acetic acid (99.7%).
To 1 liter of yeast suspension, 50 ml of the 4% solution of chitosan
was added. Five milliliters of sterile (autoclaved for 15 min at
121°C) antifoam (Dow Corning Corporation, Midland, Mich.) was added
immediately after the chitosan to prevent foaming. Chitosan combined
with yeast suspension induced high viscosity. Therefore, autolysis with
chitosan required agitation of 450 rpm during the first 3 h, after
which the agitation rate was lowered to 200 rpm.
(iv) Autolysis with a high level of bacterial contaminants.
At
the beginning of autolysis, 10 ml of the frozen high-density bacterial
suspension was thawed at 24°C and added to the yeast suspension.
Statistical analyses.
Analysis of variance (F test) was
performed on bacterial cell viabilities after 24 h of autolysis
(with log10 values). Analysis of variance was calculated
with the Genstat 5 statistical program. All interactions between
parameters were verified. Multiple comparisons were done to detect
significant differences (P < 0.001) between treatments, and the least significant differences test was used to form
regrouping. Variance homogeneity was verified by graphic analysis of
residues and by the Bartlett test.
Production of high-density bacterial suspensions.
The spent
broth obtained after removal of yeast cells by continuous
centrifugation from the industrial fed-batch fermented culture medium
was deemed representative of bacterial contaminants of the yeast
suspension. The initial bacterial counts of the four tested lots varied
from 1.1 × 105 to 5.0 × 105 CFU/ml,
with an average of 1.7 × 105 CFU/ml.
After the lab fermentation step, the bacterial population was 4.7 × 109 CFU/ml, and it was further concentrated to 4.5 × 1010 CFU/ml by batch centrifugation. Freezing of the
concentrate produced some mortality, and the thawed culture had a
viable population of 1 × 1010 CFU/ml. In order to
examine the development of these bacteria during the YE production
process, the bacterial concentrate was inoculated into the yeast
suspension to obtain an initial population of 1 × 108
CFU/ml. This bacterial contamination level is much higher than the
average contamination level of yeast suspensions (105 to
106 CFU/ml) but is representative of the extremes that can
be reached.
Growth of yeast was inhibited by cycloheximide, and the final
population (after 24 h) was limited to 6 × 10
6
CFU/ml, which was approximately 800 times lower than the inoculated
bacterial
count.
Identification of bacterial contaminants.
Thirty-four colonies
of bacteria were selected randomly from the higher dilution
(109) of the high-density suspensions. In all, 41% of the
isolated bacteria were aerobic sporulating rods, characteristic of the genus Bacillus. Cocci represented 59% of the isolates and
were all oxidase negative, as well as catalase negative. The carbon balance, determined by glucose assimilation and acid production, permitted identification of homofermentative lactic cultures. Among the
cocci, 70% were homofermentative and 15% produced some ethanol. All
isolates were gram positive.
Of the bacilli, 11 isolates were found to be
Bacillus sp.,
of which 6 were identified as
B. megaterium and 2 were
identified
as
B. circulans. No definite identification was
obtained with
the cocci, but growth patterns on Biolog and API plates,
catalase
tests, and high-pressure liquid chromatography analyses
suggested
that
Leuconostoc,
Aerococcus, and
Lactococcus were the most probable
genera.
A concern should be raised as to the exact representation of the
high-density bacterial suspension with respect to the contamination
flora of baker's yeast suspensions. This study suggests that
Bacillus sp. would constitute a significant fraction of
fresh baker's yeast,
but Viljoen and Lues (
17) reported
that lactobacilli were the
main contaminating bacteria of compressed
yeast
blocks.
Effects of initial bacterial population levels.
Two initial
bacterial populations were examined: the native uninoculated yeast
suspensions at 106 CFU/ml and the yeast suspensions
inoculated at 108 CFU/ml with the high-density bacterial
concentrate. Inoculation of the high-density bacterial suspension did
not significantly influence populations obtained after 24 h of
incubation (P = 0.265). In instances in which
conditions were favorable for growth, bacterial populations reached up
to 6.3 × 108 CFU/ml irrespective of the initial
contamination level (Fig. 2). Under
detrimental conditions, counts dropped to as low as 15 CFU/ml
irrespective of the initial contamination level. No interaction between
bacterial inoculation and pH (P = 0.592) or between
inoculation and the use of autolysis promoters was found (P = 0.889).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Effects of pH adjustment to 4, 5.5, 7.0, and 8.5 on
bacterial cell counts after 24 h of baker's yeast autolysis.
Error bars represent standard errors of the means. Different letters (A
and B) above columns indicate statistically significant differences
(P < 0.05).
|
|
Effects of autolysis parameters.
Significant effects of pH and
autolysis promoters on bacterial populations after 24 h of
autolysis were observed (Fig. 2). A pH of 4.0 or the addition of ethyl
acetate generated drops in the viable bacterial population. A
significant interaction was found between pH and the autolysis
promoters. This reflects the fact that the effectiveness of chitosan is
influenced by pH (15, 19), chitosan being inhibitory at pH
5.5 but not at pH 7 or 8.5, in contrast to the effectiveness of ethyl
acetate. These results are consistent with previous reports that
organic solvents have the ability to inhibit bacterial growth (5,
11).
In conclusion, this study shows that development of bacterial
contaminants in baker's yeast suspensions can be suppressed
during the
autolysis process. Use of a pH of 4.0 will achieve
this goal, but
yields are lower at this level (
3). Since YE
are
traditionally produced at a pH of about 5.5, and growth of
contaminating bacteria occurs at this pH level, the use of an
inhibitory compound such as ethyl acetate or chitosan is
suggested.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
The support of John Conway and Nicolas Chagnon is gratefully
acknowledged. We also thank Michel Guillet for support in statistical analyses.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Food Research
and Development Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 3600 Casavant, St. Hyacinthe, Quebec J2S 8E3, Canada. Phone: (514) 773-1105. Fax: (514) 773-8461. E-mail: CHAMPAGNEC{at}em.agr.ca.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Arnold, W. N. (ed.).
1981.
Yeast cell envelopes: biochemistry, biophysics, and ultrastructure, p. 129-137.
CRC Press Reprints, Blaker Wood.
|
| 2.
|
Baldwin, C., and C. W. Robinson.
1990.
Disruption of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using enzymatic lysis combined with high-pressure homogenization.
Biotechnol. Tech.
4:329-334.
|
| 3.
|
Barrette, J.
1997.
Production d'extraits de levures biostimulants destinés à la prolifération de lactocoques. M.S. thesis.
Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
|
| 4.
|
Breddam, K., and T. Beenfeldt.
1991.
Acceleration of yeast autolysis by chemical methods for production of intracellular enzymes.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
35:323-329.
|
| 5.
|
Chao, K. C.,
E. F. McCarthy, and G. A. McConaghy.
1980.
Yeast autolysis process. U.S. patent 4,218,481
.
|
| 6.
|
Doyon, G.,
G. Gaudreau,
D. St.-Gelais,
Y. Beaulieu, and C. J. Randail.
1991.
Simultaneous HPLC determination of organic acids, sugars and alcohols.
Can. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. J.
24:87-94.
|
| 7.
|
Hough, J. S., and I. S. Maddox.
1970.
Yeast autolysis.
Process Biochem.
5:50-52.
|
| 8.
|
Jenson, I.
1998.
Bread and baker's yeast, p. 172-198.
In
B. J. B. Wood (ed.), Microbiology of fermented foods, 2nd ed., vol. 1. Blakie Academic & Professional, London, England.
|
| 9.
|
Lurton, L.,
J.-P. Segain, and M. Feuillat.
1989.
Étude de la protéolyse au cours de l'autolyse de levures en milieu acide.
Sci. Aliments
9:111-124.
|
| 10.
|
Origane, A., and T. Sato.
1993.
Production of yeast extract. U.S. patent 5,188,852
.
|
| 11.
|
Peppler, H. J.
1982.
Yeast extracts.
Econ. Microbiol.
7:293-312.
|
| 12.
|
Reed, G., and T. W. Nagodawithana.
1991.
Yeast-derived products, p. 369-412.
In
V. N. Reinhold (ed.), Yeast technology, 2nd ed. AVI, New York, N.Y.
|
| 13.
|
Slaughter, J. C., and T. Nomura.
1992.
Autocatalytic degradation of proteins in extracts of a brewing strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The role of endopeptidases and exopeptidases.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
37:638-642.
|
| 14.
|
Speck, M. L.
1984.
Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods, 2nd ed.
American Public Health Association, Washington D.C.
|
| 15.
|
Sudarshan, N. R.,
D. G. Hoover, and D. Knorr.
1992.
Antibacterial action of chitosan.
Food Biotechnol.
6:257-272.
|
| 16.
|
Sugimoto, H.
1974.
Synergistic effect of ethanol and sodium chloride on autolysis of baker's yeast for preparing food-grade yeast extracts.
J. Food Sci.
39:939-942.
|
| 17.
|
Viljoen, B. C., and J. F. R. Lues.
1993.
The microbial populations associated with post-fermented dough and compressed baker's yeast.
Food Microbiol.
10:379-386.
|
| 18.
|
Vosti, D. C., and M. A. Joslyn.
1954.
Autolysis of baker's yeast.
Appl. Microbiol.
2:70-78.
|
| 19.
|
Wang, G.-H.
1992.
Inhibition and inactivation of five species of foodborne pathogens by chitosan.
J. Food Prot.
55:916-919.
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 1999, p. 3261-3263, Vol. 65, No. 7
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.