Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 1999, p. 3325-3327, Vol. 65, No. 8
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

The Spheroplast Lysis Assay for Yeast in Microtiter Plate Format

Department of Biological Sciences and Institute for Biomolecular Structure and Function, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, New York 10021

Received 9 February 1999/Accepted 18 May 1999

	ABSTRACT

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion References

A yeast lysis assay in the microtiter plate format improved precision and throughput and led to an improved algorithm for estimating lag time. The assay reproducibly revealed differences of 10% or greater in the maximal lysis rate and 50% or greater in the lag time. Clonal differences were determined to be the major source of variation. Microtiter-based assays should be useful for screening for drug susceptibility and for analyzing mutant phenotypes.

	INTRODUCTION

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion References

Microtiter assays offer advantages for assay miniaturization and throughput (3). Such assays have been used to determine protein contents (24), enzyme activities (14, 26), and ligand binding (4, 18) and are becoming increasingly popular because of the use of colorimetry (12, 27) and fluorescence (10, 18, 26). They have also been used for to determine growth (5, 19, 21).

Interest in yeast cell wall assembly led to development of the spheroplast lysis assay in which light scattering is used to detect cell lysis (8, 13, 25, 29). The uses of this assay include determining cell wall reassembly by yeast spheroplasts (28), determining cell wall weakening by the mating pheromone (16), determining the effects of chemical agents on wall structure (15, 17), and determining the roles of various genes in cell wall assembly (1, 2, 6, 11, 17, 22). We describe here adaptation of the yeast cell wall degradation assay (20) to a microtiter format.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion References

Yeast strain and growth medium. Saccharomyces cerevisiae X2180-1A (MATa SUC2 mal mel gal2 CUP1; Yeast Genetic Stock Center, Berkeley, Calif.) was used in this study, and the medium used was SC medium (23). Yeast cells were grown in 50-ml batches at 30°C with rotation at 150 rpm and an orbital radius of 0.75 cm.

Enzyme preparation and assays. Zymolyase 100T (ICN, Costa Mesa, Calif.) was resuspended in glycerol-water (1:1) to a concentration of 20 mg/ml. The sediment was removed by centrifugation, and the stock solution was stored at 20°C. The stock preparation was suspended in TE buffer (50 mM Tris HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA; pH 7.5) at a concentration of 200 µg/ml. Protease (13) and glucanase (7) activities were assayed as reported previously (20). Other reagents were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo.).

Spheroplast lysis assay. Cultures were harvested after 16 to 20 h to obtain exponential-phase cells or after 48 h to obtain stationary-phase cells. Washed cells were suspended in TE buffer containing 5% polyethylene glycol 8000 (PEG 8000) and diluted to a concentration of 2 × 10⁷ cells/ml. The cells were preincubated for 30 min at 30°C. At the start of each assay, 200 µl of the cell suspension (4 × 10⁶ cells in TE buffer containing 5% PEG) and 50 µl of a Zymolyase solution (0 to 200 µg/ml in TE buffer) were mixed into each well of a 96-well flat-bottom plate. The final PEG concentration was 4%. Individual wells on the same plate were used for replicates. The microtiter plate was placed either in a Biotek Powerwave model 200 reader or in a Bio-Rad model 400 reader. Unless otherwise stated, the plates were shaken with an orbital radius of 0.021 in and rotation frequency of 19 Hz continuously between readings. The temperature was 30 ± 1°C. The first data (see Fig. 1 and 2) were obtained 1 min after mixing was begun.

Data analysis. The optical density at each time point for each well (OD) was divided by the initial optical density for that well (OD_init). Replicate values of the ratio (OD/OD_init) were then averaged, and standard deviations (SD) calculated. The error bars for the first point in each curve are SD of OD_init divided by mean OD_init. Log values for error bars were calculated from log (SD_x) = 0.5 [log (X + SD_x)  log (X  SD_x)], where X is the mean OD/OD_init. The maximal lysis rate (MLR) was the absolute value for the slope of the least-squares fit for 10 consecutive points from the steepest portion of the lysis curve. The formula used to determine lag time (LT) was LT = (y_int/MLR), where y_int is the y intercept of the MLR line.

	RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion References

Adaptation to microtiter format. For X2180-1A, the optical density increased linearly at all densities below 4 × 10⁶ cells per 250 µl of buffer. Settling of the cells resulted in an artifactual increase in the optical density, and inclusion of 4% PEG reduced the sedimentation rate by 60% (data not shown). PEG changed the lysis parameters in complex ways, so the rates obtained at different PEG concentrations are not directly comparable (data not shown). PEG (4%) did not significantly affect the protease or glucanase activities of Zymolyase. Ficoll inhibited cell lysis at all concentrations tested (data not shown).

Tests performed in the presence of osmotic stabilizers confirmed that cell lysis caused most of the measured changes in optical density. For both exponential-phase and stationary-phase cells, KCl (1 M) or sorbitol (1 M) reduced the changes in optical density by 90% when it was included during digestion with Zymolyase. The digested cells lysed spontaneously when water was added.

Assays of experimental cultures. Exponential-phase cells were exposed to different concentrations of Zymolyase (Fig. 1A). The MLR increased linearly with enzyme concentration up to a concentration of 20 µg/ml, and the LT decreased as the enzyme concentration increased (Fig. 1B). The lysis rates reached a plateau at high enzyme concentrations; for one clone, the limiting MLR was 0.036, while the minimal LT was 3.8 min at Zymolyase concentrations greater than 50 µg/ml. At a constant enzyme concentration, the MLR and 1/LT decreased linearly with the log of cell number (data not shown).

View larger version (23K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1.   Effect of Zymolyase concentration on the rate of lysis of S. cerevisiae. (A) Lysis curves for exponential-phase cells. The MLR line is shown for each data set. The enzyme concentrations used were 0 (), 2 µg/ml (), 5 µg/ml (), 10 µg/ml (), 20 µg/ml (), and 50 µg/ml (). SD are shown for all points, but some error bars are smaller than the symbols. (B) MLR () and LT1 () values from panel A. OD, optical density.

We compared the lysis rates for cells grown to the exponential and stationary phases (Fig. 2). A comparison of three exponential-phase cultures harvested over a period of several weeks revealed that the variability within replicates was low and the day-to-day variability was moderate (Fig. 2A). Replicates of a clone in the same assay yielded an SD of the optical density ratio that was 5% of the mean. When the same clone was assayed independently twice in a day, the results were similar (Fig. 2A). For this clone, the mean LT was 2.5 ± 0.3 min, and the mean MLR was 0.028 ± 0.001. The variation was somewhat greater for cultures of different clones of X2180-1A assayed over a period of several weeks (Fig. 2A). The grand mean had an LT of 3.5 ± 1 min and an MLR of 0.026 ± 0.003 (Fig. 2C). This result implies that the variation between harvested clones was greater than the variation in other factors in the assay.

View larger version (26K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 2.   Lysis curves for exponential- and stationary-phase cultures derived from independent clones. (A) Lysis curves for three exponential cultures. Two clones ( and ) assayed on separate dates and one clone () and () assayed twice on the same day were compared. The MLR line is shown for each data set. The Zymolyase concentration was 20 µg/ml. SD are shown for the outermost curves (n = 3). (B) Lysis curves for six stationary-phase cultures. The Zymolyase concentration was 40 µg/ml. (C) Grand means of lysis curves for exponential-phase () and stationary-phase cultures (). OD, optical density.

There was greater variability among stationary cultures (Fig. 2B). Six clones were grown to the stationary phase, each clone was grown in duplicate cultures, and the separate flasks were tested after 48 h of growth. For all trials performed with the same clone, the SD of the optical density ratio, the MLR, and the LT were 1.4, 5.3, and 9.9% of the mean, respectively.

For different clones of stationary cells, the MLR was 0.004 ± 0.001 (Fig. 2C). Thus, the variation among the MLR for clones was fivefold greater than the variation between MLR for the same clone. The mean LT was 4.1 ± 0.8 min. When the clones were reassayed after 72 h of growth, resistance to Zymolyase had increased, but the relative order of the lysis values remained the same; i.e., the most resistant clone after 48 h was also the most resistant clone after 72 h, etc. (data not shown). Therefore, the variation in resistance to Zymolyase was due mainly to clonal variation and not to variability in enzyme activity or cell number.

Data analysis. The shape of the lysis curve was the same as the shape of the curve obtained in tube-based assays and could be characterized by the parameters LT (the time to the beginning of lysis) and MLR. Determinations of both of these parameters were more precise in the microtiter format assays than in test tube assays. Normalization of the optical density readings corrected for minor variations in absorbance between replicates. LT was previously calculated as the period of time required for the optical density to decrease by 0.050 U. In the microtiter assay, the increased frequency of sampling led to a more accurate estimate of LT based on the MLR.

We obtained several atypical curves with no LT or no transition from the lag period to the rapid lysis phase. The latter was observed most often with very old stationary-phase cells or in assays in which the enzyme levels were very low; in either case, the LT was infinite. Such assays can be repeated at a higher enzyme concentration. There may be no LT if enzyme concentrations are too high or cell walls have been weakened by either genetic dysfunction or chemical pretreatment (15, 20); these assays should be repeated with lower enzyme concentrations.

Summary. The microtiter format provided a great advantage for the spheroplast assay since both the optimum cell number and enzyme usage were reduced 15-fold. Therefore, the limiting factor in throughput was growth and preparation of yeast cells. We made seven major observations, as described below. (i) The spheroplast lysis assay in the microtiter format produced results similar to the results obtained with the test tube format. (ii) Rotary shaking alone was not sufficient to prevent sedimentation during the assay; the microtiter format required shaking and addition of PEG 8000 to retard sedimentation of the cells during the assay. (iii) The enzyme activities and lysis rates varied with the PEG concentration. (iv) At a constant PEG concentration, MLR and 1/LT increased with the enzyme concentration and decreased with the log of the cell concentration. (v) The SD of the optical density for replicates of a trial were usually 1% for stationary-phase cells and 5% for log-phase cells. (vi) The SD of the optical density was the same when cells of a clone were grown in different flasks under identical conditions or were assayed twice on the same day. (vii) Clonal variation was the largest source of day-to-day variation.

Applications. The spheroplast lysis assay can now be used to monitor changes in cell wall structure with more precision. The uses of this assay can include screening of different strains for susceptibility to a drug (15) and screening in order to determine cell wall effects of different agents with a single yeast strain (9). In these cases, the minimum significant differences (twice the SD) between values for the same clone are 10% for the MLR and 20% for the LT. For large-scale screening to determine mutant phenotypes from different clones (17, 22), variances in the MLR greater than 10% for log-phase cells and greater than 50% of the mean for stationary-phase cells are required for statistically significant findings.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Faeza Moghul for assistance.

This work was supported by grant 1RO1-GM47176 from the National Institute of General Medical Science to Janet Kurjan, University of Vermont, and by grant RR03037 from the Research Centers in Minority Institutions program of the National Institutes of Health. M. Spencer was supported by grants from the NIGMS MBRS and MARC programs to Hunter College.

	FOOTNOTES

^* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biological Sciences, Hunter College, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10021. Phone: (212) 772-5235. Fax: (212) 772-5227. E-mail: lipke{at}genectr.hunter.cuny.edu.

	REFERENCES

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion References

1.	Boone, C., S. S. Sommer, A. Hensel, and H. Bussey. 1990. Yeast KRE genes provide evidence for a pathway of cell wall beta-glucan assembly. J. Cell Biol. 110:1833-1843[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2.	Brown, J. L., Z. Kossaczka, B. Jiang, and H. Bussey. 1993. A mutational analysis of killer toxin resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies new genes involved in cell wall (16)-beta-glucan synthesis. Genetics 133:837-849[Abstract].
3.	Burbaum, J. J., and N. H. Sigal. 1997. New technologies for high-throughput screening. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1:72-78[Medline].
4.	Cairns, A. J. 1987. Colorimetric microtiter plate assay of glucose and fructose by enzyme-linked formazan production: applicability to the measurement of fructosyl transferase activity in higher plants. Anal. Biochem. 167:270-278[Medline].
5.	Dermoumi, H. 1994. In vitro susceptibility of fungal isolates of clinically important specimens to intraconazole, fluconazole and amphotericin B. Chemotherapy 40:92-98[Medline].
6.	Douglas, C. M., J. A. Marrinan, W. Li, and M. B. Kurtz. 1994. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant with echinocandin-resistant 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase. J. Bacteriol. 176:5686-5696[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7.	Dubois, M., K. A. Gilles, J. K. Hamilton, P. A. Rebers, and F. Smith. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 28:350-356.
8.	Elorza, M. V., E. Munoz Ruiz, and J. R. Villaneueva. 1966. Production of yeast cell-wall lytic enzymes on a semi-defined medium by a Streptomyces. Nature 210:442-443[Medline].
9.	Georgopadakou, N. H., and J. S. Tkacz. 1995. The fungal cell wall as a drug target. Trends Microbiol. 3:98-104[Medline].
10.	Hector, R. F., and P. C. Braun. 1986. A 96-well epifluorescence assay for rapid assessment of compounds inhibitory to Candida spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 24:620-624[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11.	Hong, Z., P. Mann, N. H. Brown, L. E. Tran, K. J. Shaw, R. S. Hare, and B. DiDomenico. 1994. Cloning and characterization of KNR4, a yeast gene involved in (1,3)-beta-glucan synthesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:1017-1025[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12.	Jahn, B., A. Stuben, and S. Bhakdi. 1996. Colorimetric susceptibility testing for Asperigillus fumigatus: comparison of menadione-augmented 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide and Alamar blue tests. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2039-2041[Abstract].
13.	Kitamura, K., T. Kaneko, and Y. Yamamoto. 1971. Lysis of viable yeast cells by enzymes of Arthrobacter luteus. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 145:402-404[Medline].
14.	Koritsas, V. M., and H. J. Atkinson. 1995. An assay for detecting nanogram levels of proteolytic enzymes. Anal. Biochem. 227:22-26[Medline].
15.	Lim, S. T., C. K. Jue, C. W. Moore, and P. N. Lipke. 1995. Oxidative cell wall damage mediated by bleomycin-Fe(II) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 177:3534-3539[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16.	Lipke, P. N., A. Taylor, and C. E. Ballou. 1976. Morphogenic effects of alpha-factor on Saccharomyces cerevisiae A cells. J. Bacteriol. 127:610-618[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17.	Lussier, M., A. M. White, J. Sheraton, T. di Paolo, J. Treadwell, S. B. Southard, C. I. Horenstein, J. Chen-Weiner, A. F. Ram, J. C. Kapteyn, T. W. Roemer, D. H. Vo, D. C. Bondoc, J. Hall, W. W. Zhong, A. M. Sdicu, J. Davies, F. M. Klis, P. W. Robbins, and H. Bussey. 1997. Large scale identification of genes involved in cell surface biosynthesis and architecture in Saccharomyes cerevisiae. Genetics 147:435-450[Abstract].
18.	Nyren, P., and V. Edwin. 1994. Inorganic pyrophosphatase-based detection systems. II. Detection and quantification of cell lysis and cell-lysing activity. Anal. Biochem. 220:46-52[Medline].
19.	Odds, F. C., L. Vranckx, and F. Woestenborghs. 1995. Antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts: evaluation of technical variables for test automation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:2051-2060[Abstract].
20.	Ovalle, R., S. T. Lim, B. Holder, C. K. Jue, C. W. Moore, and P. N. Lipke. 1998. A spheroplast rate assay for determination of cell wall integrity in yeast. Yeast 14:1159-1166[Medline].
21.	Quindos, G., R. Salesa, A. J. Carrillo-Munoz, V. Lipperheide, L. Jaudenes, R. San Millan, J. M. Torres-Rodriguez, and J. Ponton. 1994. Multicenter evaluation of ATB fungus: a standardized micromethod for yeast susceptibility testing. Chemotherapy 40:245-251[Medline].
22.	Ram, A. F., A. Woltes, R. Ten Hoopen, and F. M. Klis. 1994. A new approach for isolating cell wall mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by screening for hypersensitivity to calcofluor white. Yeast 10:1019-1030[Medline].
23.	Rose, M. D., F. Winston, and P. Hieter. 1990. Methods in yeast genetics, p. 179. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Plainview, N.Y.
24.	Schoel, B., M. Welzel, and S. H. Kaufmann. 1995. Quantification of protein in dilute and complex samples: modification of the bicinchoninic acid assay. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 30:199-206[Medline].
25.	Scott, J. H., and R. Schekman. 1980. Lyticase: endoglucanase and protease activities that act together in yeast cell lysis. In J. Bacteriol. 142:414-423.
26.	Shedletzky, E., C. Unger, and D. P. Delmer. 1997. A microtiter-based fluorescence assay for (1,3)-beta-glucan synthases. Anal. Biochem. 249:88-93[Medline].
27.	Tellier, R., M. Krajden, G. A. Grigoriew, and I. Campbell. 1992. Innovative endpoint determination system for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:1619-1625[Abstract/Free Full Text].
28.	Villanueva, J. R., M. Gacto, and J. M. Sierra. 1973. Enzymic composition of a lytic system from Micromonospora chalcea AS, p. 3-24. In J. R. Villanueva (ed.), Yeast, mould, and plant protoplasts: proceedings, vol. 3. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
29.	Zlotnik, H., M. P. Fernandez, B. Bowers, and E. Cabib. 1984. Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannoproteins form an external cell wall layer that determines wall porosity. J. Bacteriol. 159:1018-1026[Abstract/Free Full Text].