Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 1999, p. 3328-3334, Vol. 65, No. 8
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology,
University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-2131
Received 15 January 1999/Accepted 20 May 1999
A pure culture of an obligately anaerobic marine bacterium was
obtained from an anaerobic enrichment culture in which taurine (2-aminoethanesulfonate) was the sole source of carbon, energy, and
nitrogen. Taurine fermentation resulted in acetate, ammonia, and
sulfide as end products. Other sulfonates, including
2-hydroxyethanesulfonate (isethionate) and cysteate
(alanine-3-sulfonate), were not fermented. When malate was the sole
source of carbon and energy, the bacterium reduced sulfate, sulfite,
thiosulfate, or nitrate (reduced to ammonia) but did not use fumarate
or dimethyl sulfoxide as a terminal electron acceptor for growth.
Taurine-grown cells had significantly lower adenylylphosphosulfate
reductase activities than sulfate-grown cells had, which was consistent
with the notion that sulfate was not released as a result of oxidative
C-S bond cleavage and then assimilated. The name Desulforhopalus
singaporensis is proposed for this sulfate-reducing bacterium,
which is morphologically unusual compared to the previously described
sulfate-reducing bacteria by virtue of the spinae present on the
rod-shaped, gram-negative, nonmotile cells; endospore formation was not
discerned, nor was desulfoviridin detected. Granules of
poly- Organosulfur compounds are widely distributed in the environment
(25), and the range of oxidation states of sulfur in these compounds (+6 in chondroitin sulfate to Chemicals.
The chemicals used were analytical or reagent
grade and were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, Pa.),
Fluka (Milwaukee, Wis.), and Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo.). Gases
were purchased from (Northeast Airgas, Cheshire, Conn.).
Bacterial cultures.
Desulfovibrio desulfuricans IC1 (=
DSM 12129) was obtained from our collection. Desulfitobacterium
hafniense was kindly provided by Jan Gerritse of the University of
Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Enrichment and cultivation of bacteria.
Desulfovibrio
desulfuricans IC1 and strain T1 (see below) were maintained and
grown in the mineral salts medium of Widdel and Pfennig
(53); freshwater, saltwater, and brackish conditions were
created by adjusting the NaCl and MgCl2 concentrations.
Sulfate was omitted when cultures were grown with sulfonates. When
organisms were tested for growth with taurine as the sole carbon,
energy, and nitrogen source, NH4Cl was omitted and the gas
used was a mixture containing 75% (vol/vol) Ar and 25% (vol/vol)
CO2. Titanous chloride (the amount added was just
sufficient to turn the redox indicator colorless) was used as a
reductant when strain T1 was grown with nitrate as a TEA. Substrates
were added from separately sterilized 0.5 to 1 M stock solutions.
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Sulfidogenesis from 2-Aminoethanesulfonate (Taurine) Fermentation
by a Morphologically Unusual Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium,
Desulforhopalus singaporensis sp. nov.

![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-hydroxybutyrate were abundant in taurine-grown cells. This
organism shares with the other member of the genus
Desulforhopalus which has been described a unique 13-base
deletion in the 16S ribosomal DNA. It differs in several ways from a
recently described endospore-forming anaerobe (K. Denger, H. Laue, and
A. M. Cook, Arch. Microbiol. 168:297-301, 1997) that reportedly
produces thiosulfate but not sulfide from taurine fermentation.
D. singaporensis thus appears to be the first example of an
organism which exhibits sulfidogenesis during taurine fermentation.
Implications for sulfonate sulfur in the sulfur cycle are discussed.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
1 in methanethiol) is similar to the range for inorganic
sulfur (+6 for sulfate to
2 for hydrogen sulfide) (21,
50). The nomenclature of the organosulfur compounds differs
according to the oxidation state of the sulfur (50).
Sulfonic acids are a class of organosulfur compounds with the general
structure R-H2C-SO3
, in which the
sulfur is at an oxidation state of +5 (21, 47); the R
represents a carbon-containing residue which can be aliphatic, aromatic, or more complex. Sulfonates are synthesized by diverse biota
(33, 42) and are also synthesized chemically; the sulfonate moiety (-SO3
) is often added to compounds to
increase water solubility (3, 50) or to enhance resistance
to biodegradation (28, 32). Sulfonates are especially
abundant in some environments (28, 33) and thus may serve as
nutrients or sources of energy. The initial focus on the metabolism of
sulfonates was primarily on aerobic utilization of these compounds
(32, 42); cleavage of the carbon-sulfur bond usually
involves monooxygenases (16, 22) and sulfolyases
(27). However, recent reports have demonstrated that
sulfonates can be mineralized under strictly anaerobic conditions (8, 9, 29, 30, 33, 34). In initial studies of the use of
sulfonates as terminal electron acceptors (TEA) by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), we noted that none of the compounds tested served as a
sole source of carbon and energy for growth of strain IC1 (34). Recently, however, cysteate fermentation
(29) and taurine fermentation (9) have been
described for bacteria belonging to two different genera. Although the
sole structural difference between cysteate and taurine is the carboxyl
group of cysteate, the end products formed from cysteate fermentation
(ammonia, acetate, sulfide, sulfate) differed from the end products
formed from taurine fermentation (ammonia, acetate, thiosulfate). Here
we describe the ability of a morphologically unusual sulfate-reducing
bacterium that ferments taurine to form ammonia, acetate, and sulfide
as end products.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Analytical conditions.
Organic acids, hydrogen sulfide, and
growth were detected and quantified as described previously
(34). Taurine was quantified by the high-performance liquid
chromatography method used to quantify organic acids; a linear response
was observed for taurine concentrations ranging from 2.5 to 20 mM.
Nitrate concentrations were measured by suppressed ion chromatography
with conductivity detection by using an IonPac AS4A-SC analytical
column. The eluant was 1.8 mM Na2CO3-1.7 mM
NaHCO3, and the flow rate was 2 ml/min. Protein was
quantified by a modified Lowry procedure (35).
Poly-
-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) was detected as crotonic acid and was
quantified by using the assay of Law and Slepecky (31).
Desulfoviridin was detected spectrophotometrically by determining the
presence of a peak at 630 nm (26, 44, 53) and also by using
the fluorescence test of Postgate (41). DNA G+C content and
menaquinone analyses were performed by Hans Hippe of the DSMZ.
Electron microscopy. (i) Transmission electron microscopy. Bacteria in the late exponential or early stationary phase were used for transmission electron microscopy. Cells grown in a liquid culture were concentrated by centrifugation and gently resuspended in a smaller volume of culture medium. The resulting concentrate was then pipetted onto UV-irradiated (15 min) Formvar- and carbon-coated grids and allowed to settle for 1 to 2 min. The cells were negatively stained with phosphotungstate for 1 min. Excess stain was removed by blotting, and the preparation was viewed with a Philips model EM 300 electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV.
(ii) Scanning electron microscopy. A few drops of a cell suspension in the mid-exponential to late exponential phase were placed onto cut silicon wafers (area, approximately 1 mm2) that had been coated with poly-L-lysine (0.1%, wt/vol). The cells were allowed to settle for 5 to 10 min. Attached cells were then fixed with a solution containing 1.5% (wt/vol) glutaraldehyde and 1.5% (wt/vol) formaldehyde in 0.1 M HEPES buffer (pH 7.6) containing 3 mM MgCl2 for 1 h. After two washes in distilled water, the cells were postfixed with 1% (wt/vol) OsO4 in distilled water overnight. Samples were washed three times in distilled water and then dehydrated twice in a graded series of ethanol solutions (50, 70, and 100% [vol/vol] ethanol). The wash solutions were partially drained in order to leave ca. 10% of the solution, so that the silicon wafers remained immersed. New solutions were added gently, so spinae were not detached from the cells. The wafers were then dried with a critical point dryer (Polaron model E3000) for 2 h, sputter coated (Polaron model E5100) with gold and palladium, and then viewed with a Zeiss model DSM 982 Gemini field emission scanning electron microscope operated at an accelerating voltage of 2 kV.
Isolation of nucleic acids and sequencing. One milliliter of a culture of strain T1 was placed in a sterile microcentrifuge tube and centrifuged for 10 min at 13,500 × g. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in water. The contents were then vortexed and boiled for 7 min, which yielded a crude DNA template. Nearly full-length 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) was amplified in four sets of 100-µl reaction mixtures containing 3 µl of DNA template, 0.2 µM universal primer fD1, 0.2 µM universal primer rD1 (49), 200 µM dATP, 200 µM dCTP, 200 µM dGTP, 200 µM dTTP, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, and 3.75 U of AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Norwalk, Conn.).
The PCR was performed with a Perkin-Elmer model 2400 thermal cycler by using the following conditions: primary denaturation at 94°C for 2 min and 35 cycles consisting of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, primer annealing at 55°C for 30 s, and DNA extension at 72°C for 1 min. The reaction mixtures were kept at 72°C for 7 min, and then the PCR was terminated. The four PCR mixtures were combined. The presence of nearly full-length 16S rDNA was confirmed by horizontal agarose gel electrophoresis, which yielded a single band of the expected size. The PCR amplicon was then purified with a Qiagen (Chatsworth, Calif.) column and quantified with a model DyNA Quant 200 DNA fluorometer (Hoefer Pharmacia Biotech, Inc., San Francisco, Calif.). The 16S rDNA amplicon was cycle sequenced and analyzed with an Applied Biosystems Prism sequencer (Perkin-Elmer). The initial sequence was generated with primers fD1 and rD1 by using an Applied Biosystems cycle sequencing kit. The entire amplicon was then cycle sequenced with primers spaced approximately 300 bases apart. The 16S rDNA amplicon was completely sequenced in both directions.Phylogenetic inference.
Searches performed with FASTA
(39) and BLAST (54) revealed that the 16S rDNA
gene of strain T1 was closely related to the 16S rDNA genes of
sulfate-reducing members of the
subclass of the class
Proteobacteria (
-Proteobacteria). The GCG
package (10) run on a VAX computer was used to retrieve the
following 16S rDNA signatures: AB015241 of unidentified proteobacterial strain JTB20, L42613 of "Desulforhopalus vacuolatus,"
X99707 of Desulfofustis glycolicus, X95181 of
Desulfocapsa thiozymogenes, M34411 of
Desulfobulbus sp., X95180 of Desulfobulbus
elongatus, M34410 of Desulfobulbus propionicus, L07834
of Geobacter metallireducens, X70954 of Pelobacter
propionicus, M26634 of Desulfuromonas acetoxidans, X83274 of Desulforhabdus amnigenus, L27426 of
Desulfacinum infernum, M34403 of "Desulfoarculus
baarsii," X85131 of Syntrophus buswellii, X85132 of
Syntrophus gentianae, X93994 of Desulfovibrio
sp., and J01695 of Escherichia coli.
Cell extracts and enzymology. Cells were grown in 500-ml bottles capped with screw caps with butyl rubber stoppers, which allowed us to introduce or withdraw substrates with syringes. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and washed with marine buffer (343 mM NaCl, 6 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Tris-HCl; pH 7.2) three times. After resuspension in a small volume of the buffer, the cells were broken with a French pressure cell at 15,000 lb/in2. The preparation was centrifuged at 10,000 × g, and the supernatant (cell extract) was used for enzyme assays. Adenylylphosphosulfate (APS) reductase assays were performed as described previously (33).
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The 16S rRNA-encoding DNA sequence of strain T1 has been deposited in the GenBank database under accession no. AF118453.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Enrichment cultures. In the primary enrichment culture containing malate plus taurine, growth and hydrogen sulfide were detected after about 1 week of incubation at 28°C. The enrichment culture consisted predominantly of vibrios and some rods. A secondary enrichment culture containing taurine (10 mM) as the sole carbon and energy source contained predominantly rod-shaped bacteria after about 1 week; millimolar concentrations of hydrogen sulfide were detected. A pure culture of strain T1 was obtained from the taurine enrichment culture after five sequential streaking procedures to obtain well-separated colonies. Culture purity was confirmed microscopically and by the lack of aerobic or anaerobic growth in complex medium (AC medium [Difco]) under marine and nonmarine conditions.
Morphology and physical characteristics. Cells of strain T1 were rod shaped; the cell lengths ranged from 1.7 to 2.3 µm, and the cell widths ranged from 0.9 to 1.2 µm. Often the cells were in chains containing up to six cells. As determined by electron microscopy, some cells contained nonprosthecate structures called spinae (14, 15) (Fig. 1 and 2). The spinae that were produced appeared to be the type of spinae produced by marine pseudomonad strain D7 (13). The bases of the spinae were flared, and the spinae appeared to be hollow from the base to the tip (Fig. 1, arrow). The spinae appeared to be somewhat flexible, and some of the spinae were as long as 2.5 µm. Spinae were observed on cells grown by anaerobic respiration with malate plus sulfate, as well as on cells fermenting taurine or pyruvate, although we noticed more spinae on cells grown with taurine; no detailed studies were made to determine which conditions resulted in maximum spina production. Cells were not motile, nor were flagella detected by electron microscopy. Spores were not observed, and no growth was detected after pasteurization at 80°C for 10 min; Desulfitobacterium hafniense (which forms endospores) was the positive control used.
|
|
Growth conditions and physiological characteristics. The growth temperature range tested was 17 to 37°C. We found that strain T1 is a mesophile with an optimum growth temperature of about 31°C, and growth occurred at temperatures of 20 to 35°C. No growth occurred at 17 or 37°C. Growth occurred at pH 6.0 to 8.2, and the optimum pH was 7.4. Growth occurred in brackish medium but not in freshwater medium. The electron donors that supported growth with sulfate included formate (40 mM), ethanol (5 mM), propanol (10 mM), butanol (10 mM), lactate (10 mM), pyruvate (10 mM), propionate (10 mM), malate (10 mM), fumarate (10 mM), succinate (10 mM), Casamino Acids (0.2%, wt/vol), butyrate (5 mM), isobutyrate (5 mM), and alanine (10 mM). The electron donors tested that did not support growth included acetone (10 mM), acetate (10 mM), glycolate (5 mM), glyoxylate (5 mM), ethylene glycol (5 mM), tetraethylene glycol (5 mM), ethylamine (5 mM), ethanolamine (5 mM), cysteine (10 mM), glucose (10 mM), and benzoate (2.5 mM). The organic substrates that supported fermentative growth included taurine (5 mM) and pyruvate (10 mM). Growth occurred with sulfite (10 mM) as the sole source of energy when 2.5 mM acetate was a source of carbon; no growth occurred when thiosulate (20 mM) replaced sulfite. Fumarate, lactate, succinate, malate, isethionate, cysteate, coenzyme M, bromoethanesulfonate, sulfosuccinate, and 3-aminoethanesulfonate (each at a concentration of 10 mM) were not fermented. When malate was the carbon and energy source, the TEA that supported growth included sulfite (5 mM), thiosulfate (10 mM), sulfate (10 mM), and nitrate (10 mM). However, when sulfide (final concentration, 0.5 mM) was used as a reductant instead of titanous chloride, strain T1 did not grow with nitrate as the TEA. The TEA that did not support growth included dimethyl sulfoxide (10 mM), fumarate (10 mM), and the sulfonates isethionate (10 mM), cysteate (10 mM), coenzyme M (10 mM), bromoethanesulfonate (10 mM), and sulfosuccinate (10 mM).
Desulfoviridin was not detected in cell extracts; cell extracts of sulfate-grown strain IC1 cells were used as the positive control. The cells contained menaquinone 5 (H2), as revealed by high-performance liquid chromatography. The G+C content of the DNA was 50.6 ± 0.2 mol%.Growth with taurine as a fermentable substrate and production of
inclusion bodies.
Taurine served as a sole source of carbon,
energy, and nitrogen for growth when it was used in the absence of
ammonia and dinitrogen. The soluble end products obtained from taurine
fermentation were ammonia, acetate, and hydrogen sulfide. At taurine
concentrations of approximately 11 and 16 mM, about 83% of the carbon
was recovered (Table 1). Cells grown with
taurine also contained large numbers of inclusion bodies (Fig. 2),
which were found to be PHB. Taurine-grown cells and cells grown on
malate plus sulfate contained 50 mg of PHB per g (wet weight) (25% of
the cell dry weight) and 14 mg of PHB per g (wet weight) (7% of the
cell dry weight), respectively.
|
Stoichiometry of substrate conversion coupled to sulfate
reduction.
Growth with fumarate (4.9 mM) plus sulfate (10 mM)
resulted in production of sulfide (5.7 mM), but acetate was not
detected. In cultures containing lactate (4.8 mM) plus sulfate (10 mM), sulfide (3.6 mM) and acetate (3.5 mM) were detected as end products (Table 2). The final optical densities at
650 nm after growth with lactate and after growth with fumarate were
0.17 and 0.40, respectively.
|
APS reductase levels during growth with various substrates and effects of sulfate analogs on growth with taurine. Cells grown with sulfate as the TEA had a APS reductase specific activity of 0.83 µmol of ferricyanide reduced/min/mg of protein, while taurine-fermenting cells had a lower specific activity (0.31 µmol of ferricyanide reduced/min/mg of protein). Molybdate at a concentration of 5 mM and 10 mM tungstate inhibited strain T1 growth with 10 mM taurine; no growth was observed when the culture was incubated for 1 month.
Phylogenetic characteristics.
The phylogenetic trees generated
by the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and parsimony algorithms
were in virtual agreement for both edited and nonedited alignments.
Agreement of phylogenetic trees for members of the
-Proteobacteria when edited or nonedited alignments were
used has been described previously (20). All of the trees
placed strain T1 close to unidentified strain JTB20 and
"Desulforhopalus vacuolatus" (23).
Desulfofustis glycolicus (20) also branched close
to strain T1. The maximum-likelihood tree (data not shown) suggested
that "Desulforhopalus vacuolatus," strain T1, and strain
JTB20 had a common ancestor. The neighbor-joining tree in Fig.
3 shows that the bootstrap value for
separation of Desulfofustis glycolicus from
"Desulforhopalus vacuolatus," strain T1, and JTB20 was
99%. The levels of similarity between strain T1 and JTB20,
"Desulforhopalus vacuolatus," and Desulfofustis glycolicus were 95.3, 93.0, and 91.5%, respectively. Additional phylogenetic support for clustering "Desulforhopalus
vacuolatus" with strain T1 and JTB20 includes the presence of a
unique 13-base deletion found in the unedited 16S rDNA alignment for
only these three organisms. The 16S rDNA of Desulfofustis
glycolicus does not contain this deletion. Many of the members of
the
-Proteobacteria in our alignment have an
approximately 18-base insertion between E. coli nucleotide
positions 186 and 187. The 13-base deletion is found in this insertion
region. Because this stretch of 16S rDNA was found to be hypervariable,
these sites were not used in the alignments used to produce Fig. 3.
However, we consider the deletion significant and believe that it may
be a phylogenetic characteristic of species belonging to the genus
"Desulforhopalus."
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Taurine fermentation.
The detected products of taurine
fermentation by strain T1 were acetate, ammonia, and sulfide. Based on
measurements of the substrates utilized and the products detected, we
believe that the fermentation is represented by the following equation:
C2H7O3NS
0.5 C2H4O2 + CO2 + NH4+ + HS
, where
G°' =
136.99 kJ/mol of taurine (46). This contrasts with
taurine fermentation in another obligate anaerobe, in which the
sulfurous end product was thiosulfate, not sulfide (9). Whether taurine fermentation in strain T1 proceeds by the initial reactions demonstrated for the taurine-fermenting syntrophomonad (9) remains to be determined. The proposal of Cook
(6) that transamination of taurine to sulfoacetaldehyde is
followed by hydrolytic release of sulfite from sulfoacetaldehyde and
that this process occurs during taurine metabolism in both aerobes and
anaerobes, either for assimilatory or dissimilatory purposes, is an
attractive proposal and is consistent with the overall stoichiometry proposed above.
Growth with taurine under nitrate-reducing conditions. When sulfide (ca. 0.5 mM) was used as a reductant, strain T1 did not grow with malate plus nitrate; when titanous chloride was used as a reductant, growth via nitrate reduction to ammonia occurred. The apparent inhibition by sulfide is consistent with the sulfide inhibition of nitrate ammonification reported for a freshwater Desulfovibrio isolate (7).
Since strain T1 could ferment taurine but also reduced nitrate, we attempted to grow this isolate with taurine and nitrate as the electron donor and the electron acceptor, respectively (these conditions supported growth of a strain of Acaligenes sp. [8]). Titanous chloride was used as a reductant, and the inoculum had previously been grown with nitrate so as to not carry over any contaminating sulfide. We were surprised to observe that coupling of taurine oxidation to nitrate reduction did not occur and that instead taurine was fermented preferentially. Whether the sulfur of taurine is released as sulfide, thereby inhibiting the ability to grow with nitrate, or whether the sulfur is released as sulfite, which is then reduced in preference to nitrate, remains to be studied. Desulfovibrio desulfuricans Essex 6 (43) reduced nitrate in preference to sulfate when both TEA were present; however, other Desulfovibrio spp. could reduce nitrate and sulfate simultaneously (24, 36). Clearly, regulation of the metabolism of nitrate and sulfur compounds needs further study.Oxidation of substrates during sulfate reduction. The fact that acetate accumulated during lactate oxidation and fermentation of taurine by strain T1 suggests that this isolate should be considered an incomplete oxidizer; the lack of acetate accumulation when fumarate was oxidized indicates otherwise. Other than Desulfobacter spp., SRB that are considered complete oxidizers are known to excrete acetate, or not to excrete acetate, depending on the electron donor respired (51); one such SRB had (19) a ratio of amount of lactate consumed to amount of acetate (and sulfide) accumulated similar to the ratio obtained for strain T1.
Spinae. Spina production is not limited to a particular physiological group (13), and thus far spinae have been found in Pseudomonas spp. (15), a Chlorobium sp. (4, 5), and a Synechococcus sp. (40). This apparently is the first report of spina production by a SRB. Whether the spinae in this SRB play roles that have been proposed for spinae in other bacteria (2, 13) remains to be determined.
Ecological significance. Significant concentrations of sulfonates occur in the environment; these compounds account for 20 to 40% of the total organic sulfur in marine sediments (48) and at least 50% of the total organic sulfur in a variety of forest soils (1). This report and other reports of sulfidogenesis from anaerobic sulfonate dissimilation (29, 30, 33, 34) underscore the potential for sulfonates to be significant sources of hydrogen sulfide, as well as carbon sources, in various habitats. Sulfonate sulfur reduction may thus account for reported sulfide concentrations that are significantly higher than the concentrations expected based on the pool of sulfate present (11, 17). Since taurine fermentation by members of two physiologically distinct bacterial groups leads to production of different sulfurous end products (thiosulfate [9] and the bisulfide ion [this study]), important implications for the participation of sulfonate sulfur in the global sulfur cycle are evident.
Phylogenetic position. The results of the phylogenetic analyses, as well as the presence of a unique 13-base deletion in both "Desulforhopalus vacuolatus" and strain T1, indicate strongly that strain T1 should be considered a member of the genus "Desulforhopalus." The fact that a third uncharacterized bacterium (strain JTB20) may also fall into this genus is interesting; unfortunately, no information concerning this bacterium's physiology is available.
Description of Desulforhopalus singaporensis sp. nov. Desulforhopalus singaporensis (sin.ga.po'rensis. M.L. n. Singapore, Republic of Singapore; L. suff. -ensis, native of; M.L. adj. Singaporensis, native of Singapore, referring to the place of isolation). Gram-negative cells that are 1.7 to 2.3 µm long and 0.9 to 1.2 µm wide. Endospores not detected. Cells may grow as chains containing two to six cells. No flagella. Cells able to produce the nonprosthecate structures called spinae. Strict anaerobe. Grows with 2-aminoethanesulfonate (taurine) as a sole carbon, energy, and nitrogen source without an additional TEA. Grows with sulfite as the sole source of energy with acetate as the source of assimilatory carbon. Grows chemotrophically with oxidation of formate, lactate, pyruvate, fumarate, succinate, butyrate, ethanol, butanol, or Casamino Acids coupled to reduction of sulfate; slow growth occurs with propionate, isobutyrate, and caproate. Acetate accumulates from lactate oxidation but not from fumarate oxidation. H2 and acetate are not utilized. Pyruvate is fermented. Sulfite, thiosulfate, and nitrate serve as alternate TEA for growth; 0.5 mM sulfide inhibits growth on nitrate. Desulfoviridin not detected. Cells contain menaquinone 5(H2). The pH range for growth is 6.0 to 8.2, and the optimum pH is 7.4. The temperature range for growth is 20 to 35°C, and the optimum temperature is 31°C. Isolated from marine sulfidogenic mud from a saltwater marsh in the Republic of Singapore. The G+C content of the genomic DNA is 50.6 ± 0.2 mol%. The type strain is S'pore T1, which has been deposited in the DSMZ as strain DSM 12130.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Terry Beveridge of the University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, for comments on bacterial spinae and David Benson and Jeffrey Gawronski for helpful advice and discussions about the phylogeny of strain T1. We thank Marie Cantino, Lamia Khairallah, Steve Daniels, and Jim Romanow of the Electron Microscopy Facility (University of Connecticut) for the excellent electron microscans. We appreciate helpful discussions with Pieter Visscher, the use of his ion chromatograph, and the technical assistance of Shelley Hoeft and Dan Rogers. Valuable comments from anonymous reviewers improved the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-2131. Phone: (860) 486-1931. Fax: (860) 486-1936. E-mail: erl{at}uconnvm.uconn.edu.
Present address: Department of Microbiology, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Autry, A. R., and J. W. Fitzgerald. 1990. Sulfonate S: a major form of forest soil organic sulfur. Biol. Fertil. Soils 10:50-56. |
| 2. | Bayer, M. E., and K. Easterbrook. 1991. Tubular spinae are long-distance connectors between bacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol. 137:1081-1086[Medline]. |
| 3. | Bickerton, J., J. I. MacNab, H. A. Skinner, and G. Pilcher. 1993. Enthalpies of solution of some aromatic sulphonic acids and of some aminosulphonic acids. Thermochim. Acta 222:69-71. |
| 4. | Brooke, J. S., S. F. Koval, and T. J. Beveridge. 1995. Unusually stable spinae from a freshwater Chlorobium sp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:130-137[Abstract]. |
| 5. | Brooke, J. S., J. B. Thompson, T. J. Beveridge, and S. F. Koval. 1992. Frequency and structure of spinae on Chlorobium spp. Arch. Microbiol. 157:319-322. |
| 6. | Cooke, A. M. 1998. Sulfonated surfactants and related compounds: facets of their desulfonation by aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Tenside Surfact. Deterg. 35:52-56. |
| 7. |
Dalsgaard, T., and F. Bak.
1994.
Nitrate reduction in a sulfate-reducing bacterium, Desulfovibrio desulfuricans, isolated from rice paddy soil: sulfide inhibition, kinetics, and regulation.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
60:291-297 |
| 8. | Denger, K., H. Laue, and A. M. Cook. 1997. Anaerobic taurine oxidation: a novel reaction by a nitrate-reducing Alcaligenes sp. Microbiology 143:1919-1924[Abstract]. |
| 9. | Denger, K., H. Laue, and A. M. Cook. 1997. Thiosulfate as a metabolic product: the bacterial fermentation of taurine. Arch. Microbiol. 168:297-301[Medline]. |
| 10. | Devereux, J., P. Haeberli, and O. Smithies. 1984. A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:387-395. |
| 11. | Dunnette, D. A., D. P. Chynoweth, and K. H. Mancy. 1985. The source of hydrogen sulfide in anoxic sediment. Water Res. 19:875-884. |
| 12. |
Dzier ewicz, Z.,
B. Cwalina,
E. Chodurek, and L. Bula .
1997.
Differences in hydrogenase and APS-reductase activity between Desulfovibrio desulfuricans strains growing on sulphate or nitrate.
Acta Biol. Cracov. Ser. Bot.
39:9-15.
|
| 13. | Easterbrook, K. B. 1989. Spinate bacteria, p. 1991-1993. In J. T. Staley, M. P. Bryant, N. Pfennig, and J. G. Holt (ed.), Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, vol. 3. The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, Md. |
| 14. | Easterbrook, K. B., and R. W. Coombs. 1976. Spinin: the subunit protein of bacterial spinae. Can. J. Microbiol. 22:438-440[Medline]. |
| 15. | Easterbrook, K. B., J. H. M. Willison, and R. W. Coombs. 1976. Arrangement of morphological subunits in bacterial spinae. Can. J. Microbiol. 22:619-629[Medline]. |
| 16. |
Eichhorn, E.,
J. R. van der Ploeg,
M. A. Kertesz, and T. Leisinger.
1997.
Characterization of -ketoglutarate-dependent taurine dioxygenase from Escherichia coli.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:23031-23036 |
| 17. | Federle, T. W., and B. S. Schwab. 1992. Mineralization of surfactants in anaerobic sediments of a laundromat waste pond. Water Res. 26:123-127. |
| 18. | Felsenstein, J. 1993. PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package), version 3.5c. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle. |
| 19. | Friedrich, M., and B. Schink. 1995. Isolation and characterization of a desulforubidin-containing sulfate-reducting bacterium growing with glycolate. Arch. Microbiol. 164:217-279. |
| 20. |
Friedrich, M.,
N. Springer,
W. Ludwig, and B. Schink.
1996.
Phylogenetic positions of Desulfofustis glycolicus gen. nov., sp. nov., and Syntrophobotulus glycolicus gen. nov., sp. nov., two new strict anaerobes growing with glycolic acid.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
46:1065-1069 |
| 21. | Hanselmann, K. W. 1991. Microbial energetics applied to waste repositories. Experientia 47:645-687. |
| 22. | Higgins, T. P., M. Davey, J. Trickett, D. P. Kelly, and J. C. Murrell. 1996. Metabolism of methansulfonic acid involves a multicomponent monooxygenase enzyme. Microbiology 142:1-10. |
| 23. | Isaksen, M. F., and A. Teske. 1996. Desulforhopalus vacuolatus gen. nov., sp. nov., a new moderately psychrophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium with gas vacuoles isolated from a temperate estuary. Arch. Microbiol. 166:160-168. |
| 24. | Keith, S. M., and R. A. Herbert. 1983. Dissimilatory nitrate reduction by a strain of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 18:55-59. |
| 25. | Kelly, D. P., and N. A. Smith. 1990. Organic sulfur compounds in the environment. Biogeochemistry, microbiology and ecological aspects. Adv. Microb. Ecol. 11:345-385. |
| 26. |
Kobayashi, K.,
E. Takahashi, and M. Ishimoto.
1972.
Biochemical studies on sulfate-reducing bacteria. XI. Purification and some properties of sulfate-reductase, desulfoviridin.
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
72:879-887 |
| 27. |
Kondo, H., and M. Ishimoto.
1975.
Purification and properties of sulfoacetaldehyde sulfo-lyase, a thiamine pyrophosphate-dependent enzyme forming sulfite and acetate.
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
78:317-325 |
| 28. | Kuhn, E. P., and J. M. Suflita. 1989. Anaerobic biodegradation of nitrogen-substituted and sulfonated benzene aquifer contaminants. Haz. Waste Haz. Mater. 6:121-133. |
| 29. | Laue, H., K. Denger, and A. M. Cook. 1997. Fermentation of cysteate by a sulfate-reducing bacterium. Arch. Microbiol. 168:210-214. |
| 30. | Laue, H., K. Denger, and A. M. Cook. 1997. Taurine reduction in anaerobic respiration of Bilophila wadsworthia RZATAU. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:2016-2021[Abstract]. |
| 31. |
Law, J. H., and R. A. Slepecky.
1961.
Assay of poly- -hydroxybutyric acid.
J. Bacteriol.
82:33-36 |
| 32. | Leidner, H., R. Gloor, D. Wüest, and K. Wuhrmann. 1980. The influence of the sulphonic group on the biodegradability of n-alkylbenzene sulphonates. Xenobiotica 10:47-56[Medline]. |
| 33. | Lie, T. J., J. R. Leadbetter, and E. R. Leadbetter. 1998. Metabolism of sulfonic acids and other organosulfur compounds by sulfate-reducing bacteria. Geomicrobiol. J. 15:135-149. |
| 34. | Lie, T. J., T. Pitta, E. R. Leadbetter, W. Godchaux III, and J. R. Leadbetter. 1996. Sulfonates: novel electron acceptors in anaerobic respiration. Arch. Microbiol. 166:204-210[Medline]. |
| 35. | Markwell, M. A. K., S. M. Hass, L. L. Bieber, and N. E. Tolbert. 1978. A modification of Lowry procedure to simplify protein determination in membrane and lipoprotein samples. Anal. Biochem. 87:206-210[Medline]. |
| 36. | McCready, R. G. L., W. D. Gould, and F. D. Cook. 1983. Respiratory nitrate reduction by Desulfovibrio sp. Arch. Microbiol. 146:63-67. |
| 37. | Oremland, R. S., and D. G. Capone. 1988. Use of specific inhibitors in biogeochemistry and microbial ecology. Adv. Microb. Ecol. 10:285-383. |
| 38. |
Page, R. D. M.
1996.
TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers.
Comput. Applic. Biosci.
12:357-358 |
| 39. |
Pearson, W. R., and D. J. Lipman.
1988.
Improved tools for biological sequence comparison.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:2444-2448 |
| 40. | Perkins, F. O., L. W. Haas, D. E. Phillips, and K. L. Webb. 1981. Ultrastructure of a marine Synechococcus possessing spinae. Can. J. Microbiol. 27:318-329[Medline]. |
| 41. | Postgate, J. R. 1984. The sulphate-reducing bacteria, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. |
| 42. | Seitz, A. P., and E. R. Leadbetter. 1995. Microbial assimilation and dissimilation of sulfonate sulfur, p. 365-376. In M. A. Vairavamurthy, and A. A. Schoonen (ed.), Geochemical transformation of sedimentary sulfur. American Chemical Society Symposium Series, no. 612. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. |
| 43. | Seitz, H.-J., and H. Cypionka. 1986. Chemolithotrophic growth of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans with hydrogen coupled to ammonification of nitrate or nitrite. Arch. Microbiol. 146:63-67. |
| 44. | Steuber, J., H. Cypionka, and P. M. H. Kroneck. 1994. Mechanism of dissimilatory sulfite reduction by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans: purification of a membrane-bound sulfite reductase and coupling with cytochrome c3 and hydrogenase. Arch. Microbiol. 162:255-260. |
| 45. | Strimmer, K., and A. V. Haeseler. 1996. Quartet puzzling: a quartet maximum likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:964-969. |
| 46. |
Thauer, R. K.,
K. Jungermann, and K. Decker.
1977.
Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria.
Bacteriol. Rev.
41:100-180 |
| 47. | Vairavamurthy, A., B. Manowitz, G. W. Luther III, and Y. Jeon. 1993. Oxidation state of sulfur in thiosulfate and implications for anaerobic energy metabolism. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 57:1619-1623. |
| 48. | Vairavamurthy, A., W. Zhou, T. Eglinton, and B. Manowitz. 1994. Sulfonates: a novel class of organic sulfur compounds in marine sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 58:4681-4687. |
| 49. |
Weisburg, W. G.,
S. M. Barns,
D. A. Pelletier, and D. J. Lane.
1991.
16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study.
J. Bacteriol.
173:697-703 |
| 50. | Whitham, G. H. 1995. Organosulfur chemistry. Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 51. | Widdel, F. 1988. Microbiology and ecology of sulfate- and sulfur-reducing bacteria, p. 469-585. In A. J. B. Zehnder (ed.), Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y. |
| 52. | Widdel, F., and F. Bak. 1992. Gram-negative mesophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria, p. 33353-3378. In A. Balows, H. G. Truper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder, and K.-H. Schleifer (ed.), The prokaryotes. A handbook on the biology of bacteria: ecophysiology, isolation, identification, applications, 2nd ed., vol. 4. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y. |
| 53. | Widdel, F., and N. Pfennig. 1981. Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. I. Isolation of new sulfate-reducing bacteria enriched with acetate from saline environments. Description of Desulfobacter postgatei gen. nov., sp. nov. Arch. Microbiol. 129:395-400[Medline]. |
| 54. |
Zhang, J., and T. L. Madden.
1997.
PowerBLAST: a new network BLAST application for interactive or automated sequence analysis and annotation.
Genome Res.
7:649-656 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Eukaryot. Cell | All ASM Journals |
|---|