Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 1999, p. 3599-3604, Vol. 65, No. 8
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evidence for Involvement of Gut-Associated Denitrifying Bacteria
in Emission of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) by Earthworms
Obtained from Garden and Forest Soils
Carola
Matthies,*
Anja
Grießhammer,
Martina
Schmittroth, and
Harold L.
Drake
Department of Ecological Microbiology,
BITOEK, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany
Received 1 March 1999/Accepted 23 May 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Earthworms (Aporrectodea caliginosa, Lumbricus
rubellus, and Octolasion lacteum) obtained from
nitrous oxide (N2O)-emitting garden soils emitted 0.14 to
0.87 nmol of N2O h
1 g (fresh
weight)
1 under in vivo conditions. L. rubellus obtained from N2O-emitting forest soil also
emitted N2O, which confirmed previous observations (G. R. Karsten and H. L. Drake, Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63:1878-1882, 1997). In contrast, commercially obtained
Lumbricus terrestris did not emit N2O; however,
such worms emitted N2O when they were fed (i.e.,
preincubated in) garden soils. A. caliginosa, L. rubellus, and O. lacteum substantially increased the
rates of N2O emission of garden soil columns and
microcosms. Extrapolation of the data to in situ conditions indicated
that N2O emission by earthworms accounted for approximately
33% of the N2O emitted by garden soils. In vivo emission
of N2O by earthworms obtained from both garden and forest
soils was greatly stimulated when worms were moistened with sterile
solutions of nitrate or nitrite; in contrast, ammonium did not
stimulate in vivo emission of N2O. In the presence of nitrate, acetylene increased the N2O emission rates of
earthworms; in contrast, in the presence of nitrite, acetylene had
little or no effect on emission of N2O. In vivo emission of
N2O decreased by 80% when earthworms were preincubated in
soil supplemented with streptomycin and tetracycline. On a fresh weight
basis, the rates of N2O emission of dissected earthworm gut
sections were substantially higher than the rates of N2O
emission of dissected worms lacking gut sections, indicating that
N2O production occurred in the gut rather than on the worm
surface. In contrast to living earthworms and gut sections that
produced N2O under oxic conditions (i.e., in the presence
of air), fresh casts (feces) from N2O-emitting earthworms
produced N2O only under anoxic conditions. Collectively, these results indicate that gut-associated denitrifying bacteria are
responsible for the in vivo emission of N2O by earthworms and contribute to the N2O that is emitted from certain
terrestrial ecosystems.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Biological production of the
greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O) is primarily mediated by
microorganisms (8, 16). Soils account for 60 to 80% of the
global emission of N2O (4, 5, 8-10, 21).
Although abiotic processes can contribute, microbial processes are
primarily responsible for the formation of N2O in soils
(8, 9). The net emission of N2O at the soil
surface depends on (i) production of N2O by soil
microorganisms, (ii) consumption of N2O by soil
denitrifying bacteria, and (iii) physical transport of N2O
through the soil column. Denitrification and nitrification are the main
microbial processes involved in emission of N2O by soils
(5, 8-10, 16). However, alternative microbial N2O-producing processes, such as dissimilatory reduction of
nitrate or nitrite to ammonium and assimilatory reduction of nitrate
for biomass synthesis, might also contribute to N2O
emission (3, 19, 20, 29, 30).
It was recently demonstrated that earthworms from forest soil emit
N2O under in vivo conditions (18), which
suggested that earthworms are a mobile N2O-producing
microsite in forest soils. The general occurrence and significance of
N2O-emitting earthworms in terrestrial ecosystems, as well
as the process(es) responsible for the production of N2O by
earthworms, have not been determined. The two main objectives of the
present study were (i) to evaluate the in vivo emission of
N2O by earthworms from two contrasting, earthworm-containing soils (namely, garden and forest soils) and (ii)
to determine if a gut-associated microbial process is involved in the
in vivo emission of N2O by earthworms.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Field sites and collection of earthworms.
Earthworms
(Aporrectodea caliginosa Savingny, Octolasion
lacteum Örley, and Lumbricus rubellus
Hoffmeister) were collected in the summer of 1997 from tilled soils
(sandy loam soils) in two gardens (Heinersreuth and Weidenberg) in the
vicinity of Bayreuth, Germany; properties of these soils are outlined
in Table 1. The average soil dry weights
of the garden soils were 78.2% ± 2.4% (Heinersreuth) and 76.2% ± 6.2% (Weidenberg). L. rubellus Hoffmeister earthworms were
collected in the summer of 1996 from beech forest soils at Geisberger
Forst in Germany; this site has been described previously
(22). The earthworms were transported and stored in the dark
in aseptic beakers containing soil or soil and litter at 10 or 15°C
(depending on the in situ soil temperature) until they were used.
Lumbricus terrestris L. was obtained from a local store and
was stored at 4°C (the temperature used during commercial storage).
The earthworms were stored for a maximum of 2 weeks before they were
used and were identified by using standard protocols (28).
In situ emission of N2O.
To evaluate
N2O emission at the soil surface, the concentrations of
N2O inside gas-tight static chambers were determined over a
period of several hours. Stainless steel rings were driven about 3 cm
into the ground. Plexiglas chamber tops (height, 6.5 cm; diameter, 17 cm) were placed inside the rings and sealed with large rubber seals.
Gas samples were withdrawn through a rubber-stoppered port with
syringes at various times after closure and were injected into
evacuated, rubber stopper-sealed vials.
N2O emission by earthworms.
In vivo emission of
N2O by earthworms was evaluated by using aerobic microcosms
that did not contain soil. Each microcosm consisted of an aseptic 38-ml
serum vial that contained one living earthworm that had been washed
with sterile water to remove soil particles; excess moisture was
removed by blotting the earthworm with sterile tissue paper. For
L. terrestris (a very large worm), 150-ml infusion flasks
were utilized. The vials and flasks were closed with rubber stoppers
and seals; the gas phase was air. To evaluate the effects of mineral
salts, earthworms were moistened with 0.4 ml (1.0 ml for L. terrestris) of sterile mineral salt solutions or water (control)
as indicated below. The microcosms were incubated at 20°C in the
dark. The procedures used did not appear to affect the activity of the
earthworms; i.e., the earthworms behaved normally until the end of the
experiment. Gas samples were withdrawn with sterile syringes and were
analyzed by gas chromatography over a period of approximately 8 h.
The N2O emission rate of an individual earthworm was
determined during the initial period of emission.
Soil columns and soil microcosms.
Each soil column consisted
of a Plexiglas cylinder (height, 20 cm; diameter, 17 cm) that had a
ceramic plate at the bottom and contained 2.8 kg (fresh weight) of
garden soil. To assess the emission of N2O from soil
columns, columns were closed with Plexiglas covers (height, 5.6 cm;
diameter, 17 cm) and gas-tight rubber seals for 26 h. Each soil
microcosm was constructed by placing 30 g (fresh weight) of soil
into a 150-ml infusion flask, which was then sealed with a rubber
stopper and a metal screw cap. Earthworms were added at a density of
one worm per microcosm or eight worms (four A. caliginosa, three L. rubellus, and one O. lacteum) per soil column. The soil columns and microcosms were incubated at 15°C; the gas phase was air. Gas samples were withdrawn with syringes at different times after closure.
Preincubation of earthworms in soil supplemented with
antibiotics.
To evaluate the effect of antibiotics on in vivo
emission of N2O, four earthworms (L. rubellus) that were obtained from forest soil were preincubated
for 3 days at 10°C in 80 g of forest soil supplemented with
streptomycin and tetracycline (each at a concentration of 10 mg g [dry
weight] of soil
1).
Preparation of gut sections.
Freshly collected earthworms
were narcotized with 100% CO2 prior to dissection.
Earthworm gut sections (posterior to the gizzard) were dissected out at
a lab bench under air. The dissected gut sections and the remaining
worm material were washed with sterile water to remove gut debris and
then placed into 38-ml serum vials. The vials were sealed, incubated in
the dark at 20°C, and analyzed for N2O.
Preparation of microcosms with fresh casts from
N2O-emitting earthworms.
Washed earthworms were
moistened with 0.4 ml of 2 mM potassium nitrate and incubated in
microcosms under air as described above. The earthworms were removed
from the microcosms after they produced casts. The microcosms
containing the fresh casts were then supplemented with 0.4 ml of 2 mM
potassium nitrate, resealed, and analyzed for N2O under
either oxic (air) or anoxic (100% argon) conditions.
Analytical procedures.
N2O was analyzed with a
Hewlett-Packard model 5890 series II gas chromatograph equipped with a
Porapak Q column and an electron capture detector (18).
Acetylene was generated from calcium carbide (CaC2) and
water in a gas formation flask immediately before it was used. All
chemicals and gases were of the highest purity available. Unless
otherwise indicated, the data are means based on four replicates.
 |
RESULTS |
In situ emission of N2O at field sites.
The field
sites emitted N2O under in situ conditions during the
summer months when earthworms were collected. The rates of in situ
emission of N2O at the garden sites ranged from 71 to 714 nmol of N2O h
1 m
2 (2 to 20 µg
of N2O N h
1 m
2). The rates of
in situ emission of N2O at the beech forest site ranged
from 7 to 54 nmol of N2O h
1 m
2
(0.2 to 1.5 µg of N2O N h
1
m
2). These in situ emission rates were approximately the
same as those of similar terrestrial ecosystems (4).
In vivo emission of N2O by earthworms from garden soils
and other sources.
A. caliginosa, O. lacteum, and
L. rubellus obtained from garden soils emitted
N2O under in vivo conditions (Table
2), and emission was relatively linear
over a 3- to 6-h period (data not shown). The mean N2O
emission rates ranged from 0.14 to 0.87 nmol h
1 g (fresh
weight)
1 (Table 2). L. rubellus obtained from
beech forest soils also emitted N2O under in vivo
conditions (Table 2), which confirmed previous observations
(18). Some individual earthworms did not emit
N2O, and the rates of emission of N2O by
earthworms were highly variable (Table 2). The emission of
N2O by commercially obtained L. terrestris worms
was negligible; however, such worms emitted low amounts of
N2O when they were preincubated in garden soils (Table 2).
Although the vegetation of the garden soils and the vegetation of the
forest soils were different, the rates of N
2O emission
by
the earthworms obtained from these soils were relatively similar.
Thus,
the theoretical quality of the soil organic carbon (decomposed
beech
litter in the forest soils and decomposed crops in tilled
soils) did
not appear to significantly affect the capacity of
earthworms to emit
N
2O. Other soil characteristics may more directly
influence
N turnover processes in earthworms. When the two garden
sites were
compared, the highest mean in vivo N
2O emission rates
were
obtained with earthworms collected from the Heinersreuth
site, which
contained the highest amount of soil nitrate and had
the highest soil
C/N ratio (Tables
1 and
2).
Emission of N2O by garden soil columns and
microcosms.
The emission of N2O by
earthworm-supplemented garden soil columns was significantly greater
than the emission of N2O by garden soil columns lacking
earthworms (Fig. 1). The emission of
N2O by soil columns containing or lacking earthworms was
relatively linear for extended periods of time (Fig. 1). The
N2O emission rates were 1.4 ± 0.2 pmol
h
1 g (dry weight) of soil
1 for columns
containing both garden soil and worms and 0.3 ± 0.1 pmol
h
1 g (dry weight) of soil
1 for columns
containing garden soil alone. With garden soil microcosms, N2O emission was also relatively linear (data not shown),
and the emission rates were 7.6 ± 4.8 pmol h
1 g
(dry weight) of soil
1 for microcosms containing both
garden soil and worms and 0.3 ± 0.4 pmol h
1 g (dry
weight) of soil
1 for microcosms containing garden soil
alone. The calculated mean N2O emission rates for the
earthworms in soil columns (0.40 nmol h
1 g [fresh
weight]
1) and microcosms (0.17 nmol h
1 g
[fresh weight]
1) were similar to the in vivo emission
rates obtained with individual worms (Table 2).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Emission of N2O by garden soil columns
containing ( ) or lacking ( ) earthworms. Experiments were
performed in triplicate.
|
|
Effect of mineral salts on in vivo emission of
N2O.
In vivo emission of N2O was greatly
stimulated when earthworms were moistened with small amounts of
potassium nitrate or potassium nitrite (Fig.
2). Such stimulation was not observed
with potassium chloride, ammonium chloride, or sodium sulfate (Fig.
3). Nitrate also rapidly stimulated the
emission of N2O after earthworms were preincubated for
12 h in the absence of soil (Fig. 3; data not shown). The
N2O emission rates increased with increasing nitrate concentrations from 0.025 to 2 mM, and the N2O emission
rates were similar with 2 and 10 mM nitrate (data not shown). In all cases, the N2O emission rates obtained with nitrite were
substantially greater than the N2O emission rates obtained
with nitrate, and ammonium did not stimulate emission of
N2O (Table 3).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Effects of 2 mM potassium nitrate ( ) and potassium
nitrite ( ) on in vivo emission of N2O by L. rubellus obtained from forest soil. Water was added instead of
mineral salts to the controls ( ).
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Effects of various mineral salts (10 mM each) (arrows)
on in vivo emission of N2O by L. rubellus
obtained from forest soil.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
In vivo emission of N2O by earthworms
moistened with 2 mM potassium nitrate, potassium nitrite, or
ammonium chloride
|
|
Effect of antibiotics on in vivo emission of N2O.
The in vivo emission of N2O by L. rubellus
obtained from forest soil (1.95 ± 0.59 nmol h
1 g
[fresh weight]
1) decreased by approximately 80% (to
0.42 ± 0.06 nmol h
1 g [fresh
weight]
1) when earthworms were preincubated for 3 days
in soil containing streptomycin and tetracycline. These results
indicate that bacterial processes were involved in the production of
N2O. The earthworms had a normal appearance and behaved
normally after 3 days of preincubation in the antibiotic-containing
soil, which indicated that the general health of the earthworms was not
affected by this treatment.
Anatomical site of N2O production.
Under oxic
conditions, the capacity of nitrate-supplemented earthworm gut sections
to produce N2O was substantially greater than the capacity
of dissected worms lacking gut sections to produce N2O
(Fig. 4), which indicated that the
N2O that was produced under in vivo conditions originated
in the gut rather than on the surface of the earthworm. On a fresh
weight basis, the initial capacity of gut sections to produce
N2O in response to supplemental nitrate was substantially
greater than the capacity of living earthworms to produce
N2O under the same conditions (Fig. 4).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Emission of N2O by L. rubellus
gut sections ( ), degutted earthworms ( ), and living earthworms
( ) obtained from forest soil. The gas phase was air, and the arrow
indicates when potassium nitrate (2 mM) was added.
|
|
Effect of O2 on emission of N2O by
casts.
Fresh casts from N2O-emitting earthworms
produced negligible amounts of N2O under oxic conditions
(i.e., in the presence of air) (Fig. 5).
However, under anoxic conditions, such casts rapidly produced
N2O (Fig. 5). These results indicated that the microbial process responsible for the formation of N2O in the
earthworm gut was sensitive to O2.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Effects of oxic ( and ) and anoxic ( and )
conditions on emission of N2O by fresh casts produced by
four N2O-emitting earthworms (L. rubellus) ( ,
, , and ) obtained from forest soil.
|
|
Effect of acetylene on in vivo emission of N2O.
Collectively, the findings described above indicated that
nitrate-reducing bacteria in the gut were primarily responsible for
emission of N2O by earthworms. Acetylene is an inhibitor of nitrous oxide reductase and increases the production of N2O
by denitrifiers by blocking the last reductive step in denitrification (37). In contrast, acetylene inhibits, rather than enhances, the production of N2O during dissimilatory reduction of
nitrite to ammonium (20).
Acetylene increased the mean N
2O emission rates of
earthworms that were moistened with potassium nitrate (Table
4). The increase
was statistically
significant for garden soil earthworms and commercially
obtained,
garden soil-fed
L. terrestris. In contrast, acetylene
had
little or no effect on the mean N
2O emission rates of
earthworms
that were moistened with potassium nitrite (data not shown).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 4.
Effect of acetylene (10 kPa) on in vivo emission of
N2O by earthworms moistened with 2 mM potassium nitrate
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Garden and forest soils that emitted N2O under in situ
conditions contained earthworms that emitted N2O under in
vivo conditions. To estimate the contribution of earthworms to the in
situ emission of N2O at the garden sites, we assumed that
(i) the zone of earthworm activity in the soil was 20 cm deep, (ii) the
in situ earthworm population density was 100 worms per m2 (an average population density for soils of central and northern Europe
[27]), and (iii) the density of the garden soils was 1,200 kg (fresh weight) m
3 (this value was the mean of
values from 10 analyses). When these assumptions were used, the mean
N2O emission rates of garden soil columns with and without
earthworms were approximately 2 and 1.3 µg of N2O N
h
1 m
2, respectively. Thus, based on these
calculations, the contribution of earthworms to the total
N2O emitted from garden soils under field conditions was
approximately 33%. Similar values were obtained when the data from
soil microcosms were extrapolated to in situ earthworm population
densities. Our estimates are higher than the values calculated
previously for forest soils (18) and indicate that
earthworms can contribute to N2O emission in certain tilled soils. Since agricultural soils can have earthworm population densities
as high as 400 worms per m2 (11), the
contribution might be even higher under certain conditions. The
nitrate- and nitrite-dependent stimulation of in vivo production of
N2O which has been observed suggests that fertilization of soil might trigger a short-term increase in the in situ emission of
N2O by earthworms. Soil parameters (e.g., water content and C/N ratio) and processes (e.g., competing processes in the turnover of
soil nitrogen) might also affect the in situ emission of
N2O by earthworms.
N2O can be produced during nitrification, denitrification,
and dissimilatory and assimilatory reduction of nitrate (5, 9). The enhancement of in vivo emission of N2O by
nitrate but not by ammonium which was observed indicated that
nitrate-reducing processes, rather than nitrification, were primarily
responsible for the emission of N2O by the earthworms
examined in this study. Since acetylene did not inhibit emission of
N2O by nitrite-treated earthworms, it seems unlikely that
production of N2O was coupled to dissimilatory reduction of
nitrite to ammonium (20).
N2O is an intermediate in the reduction of nitrate to
N2 by respiratory denitrifying bacteria (34),
and N2O is often a product of denitrification in soils
(6, 14, 32). The acetylene-dependent increase in the
emission of N2O from garden and forest soil earthworms implied that denitrifying bacteria are involved in the emission of
N2O by earthworms. Certain denitrifying bacteria produce
various amounts of N2O in addition to N2 or
produce N2O as an intermediate prior to production of
N2 (2, 34). Since the rate constants for the
sequential steps in the reduction of nitrate to N2 are probably not equivalent, the relative amounts of N2O and
N2 may depend on whether nitrate or nitrite is utilized
during denitrification (2). Thus, differences in the flow of
reductant might account for the high N2O emission rates
observed with nitrite (Fig. 2 and Table 3). In a number of denitrifying
bacteria, nitrous oxide reductase is absent (31). In these
bacteria, N2O is the end product of denitrification, and
acetylene probably has little effect on N2O production. The
effect of acetylene on N2O emission therefore probably
depends on the composition of the resident N2O-producing
gut microflora. The apparent nitrate- and nitrite-dependent stimulation
of N2O emission may have involved nonrespiratory
denitrification. In general, nonrespiratory denitrification (i) does
not couple the reduction of nitrogen oxides to electron transport
phosphorylation, (ii) does not yield N2, (iii) is
facilitated by a number of bacteria, including propionibacteria, and
(iv) can yield large amounts of N2O via the reduction of
nitrate or nitrite (1, 19, 35).
Based on the results obtained with dissected earthworms, the
N2O that was emitted by earthworms originated from
gut-associated microorganisms. Since nitrate and nitrite significantly
stimulated in vivo emission of N2O, it seems likely that
supplemental nitrate or nitrite was transported into the gut, where
denitrifying bacteria (18) and production of N2O
were localized. Uptake of water or dissolved salts by earthworms
usually does not involve oral ingestion of fluids (26).
Thus, it is likely that nitrate and nitrite were translocated through
the body wall and into the gut via either passive diffusion or active
transport (23, 26). Differences in the efficiencies by which
nitrate and nitrite were transported into the gut might be partially
responsible for the differences observed in the N2O
emission rates of earthworms treated with nitrate and nitrite. The
nitrate- and nitrite-dependent stimulation of N2O emission
by earthworms and gut sections was rapid and occurred without an
appreciable delay, indicating that (i) the source of reductant used for
the production of N2O was not limiting and (ii) the
N2O-producing microflora of the gut was poised to respond quickly to nitrate and nitrite.
In contrast to living earthworms and gut sections that produced
N2O under oxic conditions (i.e., in the presence of air), fresh casts from N2O-emitting earthworms produced
N2O only under anoxic conditions. These results indicate
that the N2O production process in the earthworm gut occurs
optimally under anoxic conditions and, furthermore, suggests that the
interior of the earthworm gut provides an anoxic (or partially anoxic)
habitat for microbial production of N2O. The microflora of
the earthworm gut is enriched with bacteria capable of anaerobic growth
and activity (17), and several strictly anaerobic bacteria,
as well as facultatively anaerobic bacteria, have been obtained from
the earthworm gut and earthworm casts and characterized (7, 15,
18, 24). Denitrifiers have been observed in earthworm casts
collected from agricultural soils (12, 13, 25, 33) and have
been enumerated from the gut material of earthworms collected from
forest soil (18). Commercially obtained earthworms emitted
N2O only when they were preincubated in fresh soil (Table
2), indicating that (i) N2O-producing microbes in the soil
were ingested or (ii) ingested soil provided essential nutrients to the
N2O-producing microflora of the gut. Characterization of
the N2O-producing bacteria of the earthworm gut is
currently under way.
The activities of gastrointestinal microfloras are linked to the
greenhouse gas budget. For example, it has been estimated that the gut
microfloras of livestock and termites are responsible for approximately
30% of the global methane budget (36) and that the gut
microflora of cattle is responsible for approximately 2% of the global
N2O budget (i.e., 0.5 Tg year
1)
(21). Our findings indicate that the gastrointestinal
microflora of the earthworm contributes to the global N2O
budget. Determining the extent of this contribution will require
extensive evaluation of the diverse terrestrial ecosystems in which
earthworms are endemic.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Kirsten Küsel for reviewing the manuscript and
Anita Gößner and Andreas Popp for technical assistance.
This study was supported by grant PT BEO 51-0339476B from the German
Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Technology.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Ecological Microbiology, BITOEK, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany. Phone: (49) (0)921-555 642. Fax: (49) (0)921-555
799. E-mail: carola.matthies{at}bitoek.uni-bayreuth.de.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Allison, C., and G. T. Macfarlane.
1989.
Dissimilatory nitrate reduction by Propionibacterium acnes.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
55:2899-2903[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Betlach, M. R., and J. M. Tiedje.
1981.
A kinetic explanation for accumulation of nitrite, nitric oxide, and nitrous oxide during bacterial denitrification.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
42:1074-1084[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Bleakley, B. H., and J. M. Tiedje.
1982.
Nitrous oxide production by organisms other than nitrifiers or denitrifiers.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
44:1342-1348[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Bouwman, A. F.
1990.
Exchange of greenhouse gases between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere, p. 61-127.
In
A. F. Bouwman (ed.), Soils and the greenhouse effect. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York, N.Y.
|
| 5.
|
Bremner, J. M.
1997.
Sources of nitrous oxide in soils.
Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.
49:7-16.
|
| 6.
|
Burth, I., and J. C. G. Ottow.
1983.
Influence of pH on the production of N2O and N2 by different denitrifying bacteria and Fusarium solani.
Ecol. Bull.
35:207-215.
|
| 7.
|
Citernesi, U.,
R. Neglia,
A. Seritti,
A. A. Lepidi,
C. Filippi,
G. Bagnoli,
M. P. Nuti, and R. Galluzzi.
1977.
Nitrogen fixation in the gastro-enteric cavity of soil animals.
Soil Biol. Biochem.
9:71-72.
|
| 8.
|
Conrad, R.
1995.
Soil microbial processes involved in production and consumption of atmospheric trace gases, p. 207-250.
In
J. G. Jones (ed.), Advances in microbial ecology, vol. 14. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 9.
|
Conrad, R.
1996.
Soil microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases (H2, CO, CH4, OCS, N2O, and NO).
Microbiol. Rev.
60:609-640[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Davidson, E. A.
1991.
Fluxes of nitrous oxide and nitric oxide from terrestrial ecosystems, p. 219-235.
In
J. E. Rogers, and W. B. Whitman (ed.), Microbial production and consumption of greenhouse gases: methane, nitrogen oxides, and halomethanes. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 11.
|
Edwards, C. A., and P. J. Bohlen.
1996.
Biology and ecology of earthworms.
Chapman and Hall, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 12.
|
Elliot, P. W.,
D. Knight, and J. M. Anderson.
1990.
Denitrification in earthworm casts and soil from pastures under different fertilizer and drainage regimes.
Soil Biol. Biochem.
22:601-605.
|
| 13.
|
Elliot, P. W.,
D. Knight, and J. M. Anderson.
1991.
Variables controlling denitrification from earthworm casts and soil in permanent pastures.
Biol. Fertil. Soils
11:24-29.
|
| 14.
|
Firestone, M. K.,
R. B. Firestone, and J. M. Tiedje.
1980.
Nitrous oxide from soil denitrification: factors controlling its biological production.
Science
208:749-751[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Furlong, M. A.,
W. B. Whitman, and D. C. Coleman.
1998.
Phenotypic comparison of bacterial isolates obtained from drilosphere soil, bulk soil and earthworm guts, abstr. N-10, p. 367.
In
Abstracts of the 98th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 1998. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 16.
|
Hutchinson, G. L.
1995.
Biosphere-atmosphere exchange of gaseous N oxides, p. 219-236.
In
R. Lal, J. Kimble, E. Levine, and B. A. Stewart (ed.), Soils and global change. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 17.
|
Karsten, G. R., and H. L. Drake.
1995.
Comparative assessment of the aerobic and anaerobic microflora of earthworm guts and forest soils.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
61:1039-1044[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Karsten, G. R., and H. L. Drake.
1997.
Denitrifying bacteria in the earthworm gastrointestinal tract and in vivo emission of nitrous oxide (N2O) by earthworms.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63:1878-1882[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Kaspar, H. F.
1982.
Nitrite reduction to nitrous oxide by propionibacteria: detoxication mechanism.
Arch. Microbiol.
133:126-130.
|
| 20.
|
Kaspar, H. F., and J. M. Tiedje.
1981.
Dissimilatory reduction of nitrate and nitrite in the bovine rumen: nitrous oxide production and effect of acetylene.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
41:705-709[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Khalil, M. A. K., and R. A. Rasmussen.
1992.
The global sources of nitrous oxide.
J. Geophys. Res.
97:14651-14660.
|
| 22.
|
Küsel, K., and H. L. Drake.
1995.
Effects of environmental parameters on the formation and turnover of acetate by forest soils.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
61:3667-3675[Abstract].
|
| 23.
|
Lee, K. E.
1985.
Earthworms their ecology and relationships with soils and land use, p. 56-66.
Academic Press, North Ryde, Australia.
|
| 24.
|
Márialigeti, K.
1979.
On the community-structure of the gut-microbiota of Eisenia lucens (Annelida, Oligochaeta).
Pedobiologia
19:213-220.
|
| 25.
|
Mulongoy, K., and A. Bedoret.
1989.
Properties of worm casts and surface soils under various plant covers in the humid tropics.
Soil Biol. Biochem.
21:197-203.
|
| 26.
|
Oglesby, L. C.
1978.
Salt and water balance, p. 555-658.
In
P. J. Mill (ed.), Physiology of annelids. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 27.
|
Schachtschabel, P.,
H.-P. Blume,
G. Brümmer,
K.-H. Hartge, and U. Schwertmann.
1992.
Scheffer/Schachtschabel Lehrbuch der Bodenkunde, 13th ed.
Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.
|
| 28.
|
Schaefer, M.
1992.
Brohmer Fauna von Deutschland.
Quelle & Meyer, Heidelberg, Germany.
|
| 29.
|
Smith, M. S.
1982.
Dissimilatory reduction of nitrite to ammonium and nitrous oxide by a soil Citrobacter sp.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
43:854-860[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Smith, M. S., and K. Zimmermann.
1981.
Nitrous oxide production by nondenitrifying soil nitrate reducers.
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.
45:865-871.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] |
| 31.
|
Stouthamer, A. H.
1988.
Dissimilatory reduction of oxidized nitrogen compounds, p. 245-303.
In
A. J. B. Zehnder (ed.), Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 32.
|
Struwe, S., and A. Kjøller.
1994.
Potential for N2O production from beech (Fagus silvaticus) forest soils with varying pH.
Soil Biol. Biochem.
26:1003-1009.
|
| 33.
|
Svensson, B. H.,
U. Boström, and L. Klemedtson.
1986.
Potential for higher rates of denitrification in earthworm casts than in the surrounding soil.
Biol. Fertil. Soils
2:147-149.
|
| 34.
|
Tiedje, J. M.
1982.
Denitrification, p. 1011-1026.
In
A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney (ed.), Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Agronomy Monograph no. 9. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wis.
|
| 35.
|
Tiedje, J. M.
1988.
Ecology of denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium, p. 179-244.
In
A. J. B. Zehnder (ed.), Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 36.
|
Tyler, S. C.
1991.
The global methane budget, p. 7-38.
In
J. E. Rogers, and W. B. Whitman (ed.), Microbial production and consumption of greenhouse gases: methane, nitrogen oxides, and halomethanes. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 37.
|
Yoshinari, T., and R. Knowles.
1976.
Acetylene inhibition of nitrous oxide reduction by denitrifying bacteria.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
69:705-710[Medline].
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 1999, p. 3599-3604, Vol. 65, No. 8
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Wust, P. K., Horn, M. A., Henderson, G., Janssen, P. H., Rehm, B. H. A., Drake, H. L.
(2009). Gut-Associated Denitrification and In Vivo Emission of Nitrous Oxide by the Earthworm Families Megascolecidae and Lumbricidae in New Zealand. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
75: 3430-3436
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wust, P. K., Horn, M. A., Drake, H. L.
(2009). In Situ Hydrogen and Nitrous Oxide as Indicators of Concomitant Fermentation and Denitrification in the Alimentary Canal of the Earthworm Lumbricus terrestris. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
75: 1852-1859
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Horn, M. A., Mertel, R., Gehre, M., Kastner, M., Drake, H. L.
(2006). In Vivo Emission of Dinitrogen by Earthworms via Denitrifying Bacteria in the Gut. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
72: 1013-1018
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Horn, M. A., Drake, H. L., Schramm, A.
(2006). Nitrous Oxide Reductase Genes (nosZ) of Denitrifying Microbial Populations in Soil and the Earthworm Gut Are Phylogenetically Similar. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
72: 1019-1026
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Horn, M. A., Ihssen, J., Matthies, C., Schramm, A., Acker, G., Drake, H. L.
(2005). Dechloromonas denitrificans sp. nov., Flavobacterium denitrificans sp. nov., Paenibacillus anaericanus sp. nov. and Paenibacillus terrae strain MH72, N2O-producing bacteria isolated from the gut of the earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.
55: 1255-1265
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ihssen, J., Horn, M. A., Matthies, C., Gossner, A., Schramm, A., Drake, H. L.
(2003). N2O-Producing Microorganisms in the Gut of the Earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa Are Indicative of Ingested Soil Bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 1655-1661
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Horn, M. A., Schramm, A., Drake, H. L.
(2003). The Earthworm Gut: an Ideal Habitat for Ingested N2O-Producing Microorganisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 1662-1669
[Abstract]
[Full Text]