Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 1999, p. 4241-4244, Vol. 65, No. 9
Dipartimento Scientifico e Tecnologico,
Received 10 February 1999/Accepted 1 July 1999
PCR assays with primers targeted to the genes encoding 16S rRNA
were developed for detection of dairy propionibacteria.
Propionibacterium thoenii specific oligonucleotide PT3 was
selected after partial resequencing. Tests allowed the detection of
less than 10 cells per reaction from milk and cheese and
102 cells per reaction from forage and soil.
Dairy or "classical"
propionibacteria have great technological importance for Swiss-type
cheeses, where they are responsible for "holes" and flavor
formation. Strains belonging to the four Propionibacterium
species P. freudenreichii, P. jensenii, P. acidipropionici, and P. thoenii, are frequently present
in raw milk, in numbers varying between 10 and 104 CFU/ml
(20), as a consequence of environmental contamination. A
prevalence of the species P. freudenreichii and P. jensenii has been observed in milk and derived products after
isolation in plates (1, 14, 15, 18, 19). Propionibacteria
can also cause defects in cheeses, mainly anomalous blowing (2, 11), and pigmented P. thoenii and P. jensenii strains cause the "brown spot" of cheese paste
(7). To reduce economic losses in dairy productions, the
propionibacterium content of raw milk should be better controlled,
limiting their diffusion in the dairy environment. Few reports exist
regarding the isolation of propionibacteria from substrates like feed
or soil coming into contact with raw milk (5, 17, 21). An
explanation could be the major inhibiting effects exerted in plates by
the typical microflora of such substrates towards propionibacteria.
Growth media currently used for propionibacterium isolation are not
sufficiently selective, and moreover, typical propionibacterium
colonies appear after at least 6 days (20). PCR-based
specific assays are a valuable alternative to plating methods, being
far more rapid, more specific, and unhindered by the presence of
non-target microorganisms. Dasen et al. (6) have developed a
multiplex PCR assay using a genus-specific primer, targeted to the
genes encoding the 16S rRNA, together with two universal primers
(6). Specific DNA fragments, differing slightly in size,
were amplified from both dairy and cutaneous species of
Propionibacterium. The present study regards the selection of a different primer set for each dairy species and PCR detection of
propionibacteria from various substrates without previous isolation.
The following type (T) and reference strains plus
propionibacterium isolates were used in all the specificity tests:
P. freudenreichii subsp. freudenreichii NCFB
564T, P. freudenreichii subsp.
shermanii NCFB 853T, 35 P. freudenreichii isolates (19), P. jensenii
NCFB 572, NCFB 565, NCFB 571, 15 P. jensenii isolates
(19), P. acidipropionici NCFB 563T,
NCFB 570, four P. acidipropionici isolates (19),
P. thoenii NCFB 568T, NCFB 569, two P. thoenii isolates (19), Propionibacterium acnes LMG 16711T, Bifidobacterium animalis
LMG 10508T, Bifidobacterium longum LMG
13197T, Enterococcus faecalis LMG
7937T, Enterococcus faecium LMG
11423T, Escherichia coli LMG 2092T,
Lactobacillus brevis LMG 7944T,
Lactobacillus zeae ATCC 393, Lactobacillus
coryneformis DSM 20001T, Lactobacillus
curvatus LMG 12006, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp.
bulgaricus LMG 6901T, Lactobacillus
fructivorans LMG 9201T, Lactobacillus
gasseri NCFB 2233T, Lactobacillus
helveticus ATCC 10797T, Lactobacillus
hilgardii LMG 6895T, Lactobacillus
plantarum ATCC 14917T, Lactobacillus pontis
ATCC 14187T, Lactobacillus reuteri DSM
20016T, Lactococcus lactis subsp.
lactis LMG 6890T, Leuconostoc
mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum LMG 6908T,
Kocuria varians 55, Pediococcus acidilactici LMG
11384T, and Streptococcus thermophilus LMG
6896T.
Dairy propionibacteria were cultured in sodium lactate (SL) broth
(9) in jars for anaerobiosis using the Anaerocult A system (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at 30°C for 48 to 72 h. Lactic acid bacteria were grown at 30 or 37°C in anaerobiosis in MRS broth (Oxoid, Basingtoke, United Kingdom) for 24 to 72 h. The other bacteria were grown at 37°C for 24 to 72 h in brain heart
infusion broth (Oxoid); P. acnes and bifidobacteria were
incubated by anaerobiosis. Propionibacterium counts in samples were
carried out on SL agar.
Genomic DNA was purified from 1 ml of bacterial culture in late
exponential growth phase as previously described (19).
Samples of milk, cheese, forage, and soil used to determine the
detection limits had been checked by plate count for absence of dairy
propionibacteria and stored frozen until use. Each solid material was
homogenized in 1:1 (wt/vol) sterile 1/4-strength Ringer solution.
Aliquots of suspensions were artificially inoculated with
propionibacterium pure cultures in numbers ranging between 108 and 1 cell/ml.
Prior to nucleic acid extraction, inoculated cheese, soil, and forage
suspensions of 1:1 (wt/vol) in 1/4 strength sterile Ringer solution
(Oxoid) were filtered under vacuum through 17- to 25-µm-pore-size
filter paper (Forlab Carlo Erba, Milan, Italy). One milliliter of
filtered suspension or milk was centrifuged at 8,000 rpm for 10 min.
For forage and soil samples of unknown Propionibacterium
content, 50 ml of suspension was centrifuged as described above. The
pellet was resuspended in 500 µl of lysis solution (0.1 M NaOH and
1% sodium dodecyl sulfate). After chloroform extraction, nucleic acids
were precipitated with 2 volumes of absolute ethanol and washed once
with 70% ethanol. In the nucleic acid extraction from forage and soil,
10% polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) was added to the 70% ethanol in the
final washing step (22). Nucleic acids were finally vacuum
dried and dissolved in 20 µl of Tris-EDTA buffer.
Oligonucleotides reported in Table 1 were
designed by comparison of the 16S rDNA sequences available in the EMBL
database for dairy and non-dairy propionibacteria (P. acidipropionici X53221, P. freudenreichii X53217,
P. jensenii X53219, P. thoenii X53220, P. acnes X53218, Propionibacterium cyclohexanicum D82046,
Propionibacterium propionicus X53216) (3, 4), some taxonomically related species (Mycobacterium komossense
X55591, Eubacterium combesii L34614, Corynebacterium
xerosis X84446, Arthrobacter globiformis X80739,
Micrococcus luteus M38242, Actinomyces israelii
X53228, Brevibacterium linens X76566) and microorganisms
commonly found in milk and dairy products (L. helveticus
X61141, L. delbrueckii X52654, L. casei M23928, L. brevis X61134, S. thermophilus X68418).
Sequence alignment was carried out with the ClustalX software (EMBL,
Heidelberg, Germany).
The amplification programs of genus-specific, species-specific, and
seminested PCR (10) consisted of denaturation at 94°C for
4 min, 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing for
15 s at temperatures varying with the upstream primer used, and
extension at 72°C for 1 min followed by a final extension at 72°C
for 5 min. The 20-µl reaction mixture contained 100 µM each dNTP,
0.5 µM each primer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 2 µl of 10× reaction buffer, 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim,
Mannheim, Germany), and 1 µl of DNA sample. Seminested or double-step
PCR was applied to the 1:10 dilutions of the specific PCR mixtures. PCR
products were electrophoresed at 100 V on 1.5% (wt/vol) agarose gel
stained with 0.5 µg of ethidium bromide in 0.5× TAE buffer (40 mM
Tris-acetate, 1 mM EDTA [pH 8.0])/ml.
A PCR product amplified from the 16S rDNA of P. thoenii NCFB
568T (DSM 20276T) was partially sequenced by
the ABI Prism Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing System (Perkin-Elmer Co.,
Norwalk, Conn.) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Six combinations of genus-specific oligonucleotides selected by 16S
rDNA sequence comparison were tested in amplification experiments using
purified DNA from all the type and reference strains reported above.
Primer pair PB1-PB2 (Table 2) proved specific for dairy propionibacteria and P. acnes, providing
only one product of the expected size (610 bp). Amplification reactions were carried out with annealing temperatures and time that did not
affect product yield. The number of cycles was set to 40, as this
determined an increase in product yield from diluted DNA of
propionibacteria without appearance of additional PCR products.
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Genus- and Species-Specific PCR-Based Detection of
Dairy Propionibacteria in Environmental Samples by Using Primers
Targeted to the Genes Encoding 16S rRNA
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
TABLE 1.
Alignment of the 16S rDNA regions corresponding to
E. coli nucleotide positions 435 to 478 for
dairy propionibacteria
TABLE 2.
Primers used in PCR identification-detection assays for
dairy propionibacteria
Upstream primers for species-specific amplification (Tables 1 and 2) were selected within a region showing the highest variability among the species (E. coli positions 435 to 478). Using primer PB2 as the downstream oligonucleotide, amplification products of sizes 868, 867, 865, and 864 bp were expected from P. acidipropionici, P. freudenreichii, P. thoenii, and P. jensenii, respectively. Excellent specificity was obtained for P. freudenreichii, P. jensenii and P. acidipropionici. Primer PT1 (Table 1), selected for P. thoenii in the same variable region, did not allow amplification from the four P. thoenii strains tested while it permitted the amplification of a fragment of the expected size from the three reference strains of P. jensenii. Oligonucleotide PT2 (Table 2), which was potentially specific for P. thoenii, permitted the amplification of a 1,148-bp DNA fragment from P. thoenii strains and from P. acnes with equal efficiency, proving not selective.
A primer specific for P. thoenii, PT3 (Tables 1 and 2), could be designed by partially sequencing the PT2-PB2 fragment amplified from strain NCFB 568T (EMBL accession no. AJ132324).
The ability of all primer sets to amplify DNA from other strains belonging to the target species was confirmed without exception in amplifications from previously identified isolates (19).
Primer pairs PB1-PB2, PF-PB2, PJ-PB2, PA-PB2, and PT3-PB2 were used in detection assays from samples of milk, cheese, forage, and soil artificially inoculated with known numbers of propionibacteria. The short procedure described above for nucleic acid purification directly from samples provided better sensitivity compared with the DNA extraction method from pure cultures (19) and other reported procedures (8, 12).
The detection limit was similar for all the specific primer sets and varied with the kind of sample. In milk and cheese, multiples of 10 cells in the PCR were detected after one amplification step. Figures 1 and 2 show examples of amplification with genus-specific primer set PB1-PB2 and with primer set PF-PB2, respectively. A seminested PCR with primers PB1-PB2 from milk and cheese permitted the detection of less than 10 cells of dairy propionibacteria in the reaction mixture. The signal was never obtained from uninoculated aliquots of the same samples used as negative controls.
|
|
One-step amplification from forage and soil was considerably less sensitive; cell numbers lower than 105 could not be detected and addition of 10% PVP to the 70% ethanol in the final washing step was necessary to allow amplification. The addition of 400 ng of nonacetylated bovine serum albumin/ml in the PCR mixture (12) was also performed, but amplification products were not obtained. In case of PVP addition, the seminested PCR assay permitted the amplification of the 610-bp genus-specific fragment from reactions containing multiples of 102 propionibacterium cells. Figure 3 shows an example of seminested amplification on species-specific products from soil suspensions inoculated with P. acidipropionici NCFB 563T.
|
The PCR assays were applied to the detection of propionibacteria from six raw milk and 14 forage samples not previously analyzed for their presence. Three samples of milk and two samples of forage were positive after single-step PB1-PB2 amplification. One more forage sample was positive after two-step amplification with the same primers. The single species could be detected by the seminested assay after species-specific PCR; in one milk sample and in two forage samples, positive to one-step PB1-PB2 amplification, none of the dairy species was present. This can be explained with amplification from P. acnes or other nondairy propionibacteria. In one PB1-PB2 PCR-positive milk sample, the presence of all four dairy species was demonstrated with the seminested assay. One more milk sample was positive for P. freudenreichii, P. jensenii, and P. acidipropionici; one more forage sample was positive for P. jensenii and P. acidipropionici.
This study has provided rapid PCR identification-detection assays for P. acnes and each dairy species of the genus Propionibacterium. Single-species detection can facilitate studies regarding the diffusion and ability to survive in different environments.
The possibility to selectively detect P. acnes with primers PT2-PB2 could allow its distinction from the other cutaneous propionibacteria, and, therefore, it should be further investigated.
Sequence comparison shows three different nucleotide positions between oligonucleotide PF and the homologous region reported for the recently proposed species Propionibacterium cyclohexanicum (13). The discriminating power of the P. freudenreichii-specific assay towards this closely related species must be experimentally evaluated.
The species-specific assays evaluated here can substitute time-consuming phenotypic identification for these slowly growing microorganisms. The preliminary individuation of samples to be further analyzed is an advantage for both practical and research applications, considering the rapidity of the whole procedure of nucleic acid extraction and amplification. The possibility to individuate milk samples containing more than 10 cells of dairy propionibacteria is useful for the choice of raw milk suitable for particular dairy productions where even initial numbers as low as 102 cells/ml are undesired (16).
For forage and soil, the sensitivity of one-step amplification is rather low and must be improved by seminested or double-step amplification. The problem can also be overcome by concentrating cells by centrifugation from larger volumes of sample suspension.
The application of PCR tests here described can give more precise indications on the seasonal variation of propionibacteria in milk and in the dairy environment.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This research was supported by a grant of the Italian Ministry of the University and Technological and Scientific Research (MURST ex 40%).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dipartimento Scientifico e Tecnologico, Facoltà di Scienze MM.FF.NN., Università degli Studi di Verona, Strada Le Grazie, Cà Vignal, 1-37134 Verona, Italy. Phone: 39 045 8098917. Fax: 39 045 8098929. E-mail: dellaglio{at}sci.univr.it.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Britz, T. J., and K.-H. J. Riedel. 1994. Propionibacterium species diversity in Leerdammer cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 22:257-267[Medline]. |
| 2. | Carcano, M., R. Todesco, R. Lodi, and M. Brasca. 1995. Propionibacteria in Italian hard cheeses. Lait 75:415-425. |
| 3. |
Charfreitag, O.,
M. D. Collins, and E. Stackenbrandt.
1988.
Reclassification of Arachnia propionica as Propionibacterium propionicus comb. nov.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
38:354-357 |
| 4. |
Charfreitag, O., and E. Stackenbrandt.
1989.
Inter- and intrageneric relationship of the genus Propionibacterium as determined by 16S rRNA sequences.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
135:2065-2070 |
| 5. | Cummins, C. S., and J. L. Johnson. 1986. Genus Propionibacterium, p. 1346-1353. In P. H. A. Sneath, N. S. Mair, and M. E. Sharpe (ed.), Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, vol. 2. The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, Md. |
| 6. | Dasen, G., J. Smutny, M. Teuber, and L. Meile. 1998. Classification and identification of propionibacteria based on ribosomal RNA genes and PCR. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 21:251-259[Medline]. |
| 7. | de Carvalho, A. F., S. Guezenec, M. Gautier, and P. A. D. Grimont. 1995. Reclassification of "Propionibacterium rubrum" as P. jensenii. Res. Microbiol. 146:51-58[Medline]. |
| 8. | Drake, M., C. L. Small, K. D. Spence, and B. G. Swanson. 1996. Rapid detection and identification of Lactobacillus spp. in dairy products by using the polymerase chain reaction. J. Food Prot. 59:1031-1036. |
| 9. | Drinan, F. D., and T. M. Cogan. 1992. Detection of propionibacteria in cheese. J. Dairy Res. 59:1-5[Medline]. |
| 10. | Herman, L. M. F., J. H. G. E. De Blick, and R. J. B. Moermans. 1995. Direct detection of Listeria monocytogenes in 25 milliliters of raw milk by a two-step PCR with nested primers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:817-818[Abstract]. |
| 11. | Hettinga, D. H., and G. W. Reinbold. 1975. Split defects of Swiss cheese. II. Effects of low temperatures on metabolic activities of Propionibacterium. J. Milk Food Technol. 38:31-35. |
| 12. | Kreader, C. A. 1996. Relief of amplification inhibition in PCR with bovine serum albumin or T4 gene 32 protein. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:1102-1106[Abstract]. |
| 13. |
Kusano, K.,
H. Yamada,
M. Niwa, and K. Yamasato.
1997.
Propionibacterium cyclohexanicum sp. nov., a new acid-tolerant -cyclohexyl fatty acid-containing Propionibacterium isolated from spoiled orange juice.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
47:825-831 |
| 14. | Malik, A. C., G. W. Reinbold, and E. R. Vedamuthu. 1968. An evaluation of the taxonomy of Propionibacterium. Can. J. Microbiol. 14:1185-1191[Medline]. |
| 15. | Merilaeinen, V., and M. Antila. 1976. The propionic acid bacteria in Finnish Emmental cheese. Meijerit. Aikakaus. 34:107-116. |
| 16. | Pauchard, J. P. 1993. La fermentation secondaire dans le Gruyère. Annual report. Federal Dairy Research Institute, Liebefeld-Bern, Switzerland. |
| 17. | Riedel, K. H. J., B. D. Wingfield, and T. J. Britz. 1998. Identification of classical Propionibacterium species using 16S rDNA restriction fragment length polymorphism. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 21:419-428[Medline]. |
| 18. | Rossi, F., M. Sammartino, and S. Torriani. 1997. 16S-23S Ribosomal spacer polymorphism in dairy propionibacteria. Biotechnol. Tech. 11:159-161. |
| 19. | Rossi, F., S. Torriani, and F. Dellaglio. 1998. Identification and clustering of dairy propionibacteria by RAPD-PCR and CGE-REA methods. J. Appl. Microbiol. 85:956-964[Medline]. |
| 20. | Thierry, A., and M. N. Madec. 1995. Enumeration of propionibacteria in raw milk using a new selective medium. Lait 75:315-323. |
| 21. | Vaughn, R. H. 1981. Lactic acid fermentation of cabbage, cucumbers, olives and other products, p. 220-224. In G. Reed (ed.), Prescott and Dunn's industrial microbiology. Saybrook Press, Saybrook, Conn. |
| 22. |
Young, C. C.,
R. L. Burghoff,
L. G. Keim,
V. Minak-Bernero,
J. R. Lute, and S. M. Hinton.
1993.
Polyvinylpyrrolidone-agarose gel electrophoresis purification of polymerase chain reaction-amplifiable DNA from soils.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
59:1972-1974 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»