Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2000, p. 449-452, Vol. 66, No. 1
0099-2240/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Isolation and Characterization of
Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni from Macaroni
Penguins (Eudyptes chrysolophus) in the
Subantarctic Region
T.
Broman,1,2
S.
Bergström,2
S.
L. W.
On,3
H.
Palmgren,1
D. J.
McCafferty,4
M.
Sellin,5 and
B.
Olsen1,6,*
Department of Infectious
Diseases,1 Department of
Microbiology,2 and Department of
Bacteriology,5 Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, and Danish Veterinary Laboratory, DK-1790 Copenhagen
V,3 Denmark; Department of Infectious
Diseases, Kalmar County Hospital, SE-381 95 Kalmar,6 Sweden; and British Antarctic
Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Cambridge,
CB3 OET, United Kingdom4
Received 3 June 1999/Accepted 19 October 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
On Bird Island, South Georgia, albatrosses (n = 140), penguins (n = 100), and fur seals
(n = 206) were sampled for Campylobacter jejuni.
C. jejuni subsp. jejuni was recovered from three
macaroni penguins (Eudyptes chrysolophus). These isolates,
the first reported for the subantarctic region, showed low genetic
diversity and high similarity to Northern Hemisphere C. jejuni isolates, possibly suggesting recent introduction to the area.
 |
TEXT |
Campylobacter jejuni
subsp. jejuni is one of the most common causes of human
bacterial enteritis in the world and is commonly found in the
intestines of a variety of animals, with birds considered to be a major
natural reservoir (4, 17). In domestic birds, the bacteria
spread rapidly within flocks by coprophagy and through contaminated air
or water (1, 5), but vertical transmission of
Campylobacter is considered unlikely (13). The
impact of C. jejuni subsp. jejuni on wildlife
populations has not yet been clarified.
Antarctica and the subantarctic region are often regarded as virgin,
pristine landscapes, unaffected by human activity. Little is known
about naturally occurring, and possibly introduced, infectious agents
there and their influence on animal population dynamics. Accordingly,
we sampled seabirds and fur seals on Bird Island (54°00'S, 38°02'W)
in the South Georgian archipelago to investigate the possible
occurrence of zoonotic enteropathogens and to determine if certain
bacteria could be used as tools for detecting biological pollution in
this and other remote areas. Bird Island was an ideal location for our
study because of its large colonies of Antarctic fur seals
(Arctocephalus gazella) and seabirds, its relatively isolated location, and its comparatively low level of human activity. In this study we successfully isolated C. jejuni subsp.
jejuni from 3% of Macaroni penguins (Eudyptes
chrysolophus) sampled, with this apparently being the first
recorded finding of such isolates for the subantarctic region.
In March 1998, fecal samples from 100 macaroni penguin nestlings, 40 black-browed albatross (Diomedea melanophrys) nestlings, 100 grey-headed albatross (Diomedea chrysostoma) nestlings, and 206 Antarctic fur seal pups were collected on Bird Island. The samples
were collected with cotton wool swabs inserted into the cloaca or
rectum. Samples were kept in charcoal transport medium (Transwab;
BioDisc, Solna, Sweden) at 5 to 10°C and analyzed within 3 weeks of
the sampling date. Samples were plated on Campylobacter selective
medium (42.5 g/liter of Columbia agar base [Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.] supplemented with 5% citrated horse blood, 10 mg
of vancomycin per liter, 500 IU of polymyxin B per liter, 5 mg of
trimethoprim per liter) and incubated for 48 h at 42°C under
microaerobic conditions. Isolates showing a gram-negative seagull-like
cell morphology under light microscopy, positive reactions in catalase,
oxidase and hippurate hydrolysis tests, and an ability to grow at
42°C under microaerobic conditions but not at 37°C under aerobic
conditions, were presumptively identified as C. jejuni
subsp. jejuni. Samples were stored at
80°C in trypticase soy broth supplemented with 15% glycerol until further species confirmation by phenotypic and genotypic methods. A total of 58 phenotypic characteristics were determined for the three isolates by
standardized methods, and the results were subjected to
computer-assisted analysis, as described previously (8). The
16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) (from two isolates) and flaA (from
three isolates) genes were amplified by PCR with chemically lysed
(2) or boiled cells as the template (Tables
1 and 2).
PCR products were purified and ligated into pGEM-T Easy Vector
(Scandinavian Diagnostic Services, Falkenberg, Sweden) and subsequently
transformed into Escherichia coli DH5
. Plasmids were then
isolated (QIAprep Spin Miniprep kit; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and used
as the templates for DNA sequencing (dye terminator cycle ready
reaction; Perkin-Elmer, Calif.; and Thermo Sequenase II dye terminator
cycle sequencing premix kit; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech,
Buckinghamshire, England) (Tables 1 and 2). Nucleotide sequence
analyses were performed by using the University of Wisconsin Genetics
Computer Group (Madison, Wis.) sequence analysis software.
Macrorestriction profiling by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)
of SmaI- and KpnI-digested DNA was performed by a
modified version of previously described methods (9, 11).
Briefly, cultures were suspended to an optical density of 1.4 at 405 nm, and a 400-µl aliquot of the cell suspension was mixed with an
equal amount of 2% low melt preparative grade agarose (Bio-Rad
Laboratories, Sundbyberg, Sweden). DNA fragments were separated on an
automated PFGE apparatus (Gene Path strain typing system; Bio-Rad).
Ramping parameters for SmaI were 5.3 to 32.3 s for
4.9 h, 32.3 to 44.5 s for 7.7 h, and 44.5 to 49.9 s
for 7.1 h, and ramping parameters for KpnI were 1.0 to
14.3 s for 4.6 h, 14.3 to 20.4 s for 7.2 h, and
20.4 to 23.0 s for 6.7 h. Restriction profile photographs
were analyzed using the GelCompar software version 4.0 (Applied Maths,
Kortrijik, Belgium). Similarities between banding patterns were
assessed by using the Dice coefficient. Results were clustered by the
unweighted pair group method with arithmetic average. A band position
tolerance of 1.2% was applied.
We obtained three C. jejuni subsp. jejuni
isolates, all from Macaroni penguin chicks. We believe this to be the
first report of C. jejuni subsp. jejuni in the
Antarctic region and the first report of it being part of the microbial
flora of a wild penguin species. No differences between the three
strains were noted in any of the 58 phenotypic tests used to
characterize them. Comparison of the phenotypic profile of the Bird
Island isolates with similar data on 37 campylobacterial taxa by
probabilistic methods (8) clearly identified the strains as
C. jejuni subsp. jejuni, since a score (Willcox
probability) exceeding 99.9% for identity to this taxon was obtained.
Several results atypical of C. jejuni subsp.
jejuni were observed, namely, failure to grow on
unsupplemented nutrient agar or potassium permanganate-, cefoperazone-,
or sodium deoxycholate nutrient agar-based media and ability to grow on MacConkey agar. However, key reactions in hippurate hydrolysis, hydrogen sulfide production, growth on a minimal medium and
alpha-hemolysis tests were all typical of C. jejuni subsp.
jejuni (8). The identity of the isolates as
C. jejuni subsp. jejuni was validated by
comparative analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained. These
were identical among the Bird Island isolates and differed in one and
four bases, respectively, from published sequences derived from the
type strain and a serotype reference strain of C. jejuni
(GenBank accession no. L04315 and Z29326, respectively).
Two genotyping methods were applied to the penguin strains to
investigate their epidemiological relationships. Sequence analysis of
the flaA gene has been suggested as a sensitive tool for
molecular typing of C. jejuni subsp. jejuni
(6). This gene shows high intraspecies variability in
Campylobacter and was 100% identical for the three
isolates. In a comparison of the flaA sequence of the Bird
Island isolates to published sequences, the homology was between 77.6 and 95.9%. The highest percentage of similarity obtained was to the
flaA sequence of strain D772 (GenBank accession no.
AF050185), isolated in 1983 or 1984 from a retail chicken in Seattle,
Washington (R. J. Meinersmann, personal communication).
Macrorestriction profiling of whole-cell DNA by PFGE is a powerful
method for epidemiological studies of Campylobacter species (3, 11). Two subsequent digestions with SmaI and
KpnI, respectively, were performed, as it has been shown
that KpnI can distinguish further certain
SmaI-defined macrorestriction types (3, 11). A previous study of 43 (8.3%) C. jejuni subsp.
jejuni isolates sampled from migratory birds (n = 498) arriving in Sweden and of 12 isolates originating from
poultry showed a high variability in macrorestriction profiles (MRPs)
(T. Broman, unpublished data). In contrast, SmaI- and
KpnI-derived MRPs of the three Bird Island isolates were
indistinguishable (Fig. 1 and
2). In accord with previously published
criteria (11), these results, combined with those of the
other phenotypic and genotypic analyses presented here, strongly
indicate that the strains represent a single clone and may be
genetically identical.

View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
C. jejuni subsp. jejuni strains
from different birds and having indistinguishable or near-identical
MRPs after digestion by restriction endonuclease SmaI. Sbhg,
Swedish black-headed gull; Sr, Swedish rook; Mp, Macaroni penguin; Sp,
Swedish poultry. Lanes , molecular weight marker ( ladder).
Swedish gulls were sampled in an urban park during a 2-week period.
|
|

View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Endonuclease KpnI MRPs of the C. jejuni subsp. jejuni isolates listed in Fig. 1. Sbhg,
Swedish black-headed gull; Sr, Swedish rook; Mp, Macaroni penguin; Sp,
Swedish poultry. Lanes , molecular weight marker ( ladder).
|
|
Should we consider C. jejuni subsp. jejuni
endemic or introduced to Bird Island? Despite the comparatively remote
location of Bird Island, a number of possible vectors, or routes of
infection, exist. Seabirds are known to cover large distances in their
search for food and could encounter infectious organisms found in areas with higher levels of human activity. Further, an increasing number of
humans visit Antarctica and the subantarctic region, for professional or recreational reasons, and such human activity could result in the
introduction of exotic microorganisms to the area. Some of our results
suggest that C. jejuni subsp. jejuni may have
been transmitted to the area relatively recently. If C. jejuni subsp. jejuni was indigenous to the area, it
would be reasonable to expect other bird species on Bird Island to be
carriers as well, especially since this bacterium is known to have a
broad host range (14). It is also noteworthy that the same
clone was isolated from each of the three birds. This could be a
reflection of the existence of a well-adapted strain that has
out-competed all others, of this particular strain having a higher
ability to survive prolonged transportation, or of contamination of
samples. The latter is most unlikely, due to the susceptibility of
C. jejuni subsp. jejuni to excessive amounts of
oxygen, which reduces its ability to survive in the environment. Also,
at the time of culturing the samples, no other bird samples were
handled in the laboratory.
The similarity of the isolates could also be the result of a common
source of infection for the three carrier penguins. In many respects a
Macaroni penguin colony could be considered analogous to a domestic
poultry flock. In both cases, large numbers of individuals are
congregated together in a relatively small area. Macaroni chicks leave
the nest at an early age and roam around in groups, and the birds
therefore are at increased risk of encountering and spreading
infectious organisms compared to more sedentary or solitary species.
Poultry frequently peck the floor or ground looking for food, while
penguins have the habit of pecking at each other and picking up objects
like stones from the ground. Considering the low number of C. jejuni subsp. jejuni bacteria needed to establish an
infection (12), the natural behavior of both chickens and
Macaroni penguins could facilitate the rapid spread of this
microorganism through a flock or colony. Consequently, when a single
C. jejuni subsp. jejuni strain is introduced to a
previously uninfected domestic poultry flock, individual birds may be
rapidly colonized (1), carrying the same clone in their feces. Genetic diversity in Campylobacter strains can arise
by several different mechanisms and may be detected by a variety of
genotypic methods (10, 16). These phenomena may account for
the results of a recent study of C. jejuni subsp.
jejuni in poultry, which indicated that different genotypes
could be found within the same flock or the same batch of poultry
products from a manufacturer (15, 16). Similar effects could
be expected with penguins. In view of the above-mentioned studies, we
cannot exclude the possibility that C. jejuni subsp.
jejuni was recently introduced to the area. In this respect,
it is noteworthy that the dendrogram (Fig.
3) based on combined SmaI- and
KpnI-based PFGE patterns (Fig. 1 and 2) indicates that the
Bird Island isolates resemble those found among many Swedish bird
isolates (69 to 95% similarity). Moreover, for one poultry isolate
investigated (Sp 1157-1), the SmaI MRP is indistinguishable
from those of the Bird Island isolates, and the corresponding
KpnI MRP shows a higher resemblance to those of the Bird
Island isolates than to any others. These similarities are reflected in
the dendrogram (Fig. 3). Nevertheless, further investigations of the
natural microbiological flora of wildlife in the subantarctic region
are needed before we can determine if the presence there of C. jejuni subsp. jejuni is a result of microbial
pollution.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Dendrogram showing relationship of combined
SmaI and KpnI MRPs from C. jejuni
subsp. jejuni of different bird origin. Sbhg, Swedish
black-headed gull; Sr, Swedish rook; Mp, Macaroni penguin; Sp, Swedish
poultry.
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We gratefully acknowledge the support given to this project by the
late Peter Prince. We also thank Simon Berrow and staff at the British
Antarctic Survey Base on Bird Island for assistance in collecting
samples and Ian Collinge and Kath Nicholson (BAS) for arranging the
transport of materials. Swedish poultry samples were kindly provided by
the Department of Food Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,
Uppsala, Sweden. Furthermore, we thank Penny Jordan for excellent
technical assistance, and John Croxall, Peter Vandamme, and Paul Haemig
for valuable comments on the manuscript.
This work was financially supported by the Center for Environmental
Research, the Medical Faculty of Umeå University, the Swedish Council
for Forestry and Agricultural Research (23.0161), the Swedish Society
of Medicine, and the Swedish Medical Research Council (07922).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Infectious Diseases, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden. Phone: 46-90-7852301. Fax: 46-90-133006. E-mail:
bjorn.olsen{at}infdis.umu.se.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Berndtson, E.
1996.
Campylobacter in broiler chickens. Ph.D. thesis.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
|
| 2.
|
Fox, J. G.,
L. L. Yan,
F. E. Dewhirst,
B. J. Paster,
B. Shames,
J. C. Murphy,
A. Hayward,
J. C. Belcher, and E. N. Mendes.
1995.
Helicobacter bilis sp. nov., a novel Helicobacter species isolated from bile, livers, and intestines of aged, inbred mice.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:445-454[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Gibson, J. R.,
C. Fitzgerald, and R. J. Owen.
1995.
Comparison of PFGE, ribotyping and phage-typing in the epidemiological analysis of Campylobacter jejuni serotype HS2 infections.
Epidemiol. Infect.
115:215-225[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Kapperud, G., and O. Rosef.
1983.
Avian wildlife reservoir of Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni, Yersinia spp., and Salmonella spp. in Norway.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
45:375-380[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Kapperud, G.,
E. Skjerve,
L. Vik,
K. Hauge,
A. Lysaker,
I. Aalmen,
S. M. Ostroff, and M. Potter.
1993.
Epidemiological investigation of risk factors for Campylobacter colonization in Norwegian broiler flocks.
Epidemiol. Infect.
111:245-255[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Meinersmann, R. J.,
L. O. Helsel,
P. I. Fields, and K. L. Hiett.
1997.
Discrimination of Campylobacter jejuni isolates by fla gene sequencing.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:2810-2814[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Nachamkin, I.,
K. Bohachick, and C. M. Patton.
1993.
Flagellin gene typing of Campylobacter jejuni by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:1531-1536[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
On, S. L. W.,
B. Holmes, and M. J. Sackin.
1996.
A probability matrix for the identification of campylobacters, helicobacters, and allied taxa.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
81:425-432[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
On, S. L. W., and P. Vandamme.
1997.
Identification and epidemiological typing of Campylobacter hyointestinalis subspecies by phenotypic and genotypic methods and description of novel subgroups.
Syst. Appl. Microbiol.
20:238-247.
|
| 10.
|
On, S. L. W.
1998.
In vitro genotypic variation of Campylobacter coli documented by pulsed-field gel electrophoretic DNA profiling: implications for epidemiological studies.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
165:341-346[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
On, S. L. W.,
E. M. Nielsen,
J. Engberg, and M. Madsen.
1998.
Validity of Sma-defined genotypes of Campylobacter jejuni examined by SalI, KpnI and BamHI polymorphisms: evidence of identical clones infecting humans, poultry, and cattle.
Epidemiol. Infect.
120:231-237[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Ruiz-Palacios, G. M.,
E. Escamilla, and N. Torres.
1981.
Experimental Campylobacter diarrhea in chickens.
Infect. Immun.
34:250-255[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Shane, S. M.,
A. Lee, and T. C. Sorrell.
1986.
Campylobacter jejuni in broilers: the role of vertical transmission.
J. Hyg. Camb.
96:153-159.
|
| 14.
|
Skirrow, M. B.
1994.
Diseases due to Campylobacter, Helicobacter and related bacteria.
J. Comp. Pathol.
111:113-149[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Thomas, L. M.,
K. A. Long,
R. T. Good,
M. Panaccio, and P. R. Widders.
1997.
Genotypic diversity among Campylobacter jejuni isolates in a commercial broiler flock.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63:1874-1877[Abstract].
|
| 16.
|
Wassenaar, T. M.,
B. Geilhausen, and D. G. Newell.
1998.
Evidence of genomic instability in Campylobacter jejuni isolated from poultry.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:1816-1821[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Yogasundram, K.,
S. M. Shane, and K. S. Harrington.
1989.
Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in selected domestic and wild birds in Louisiana.
Avian Dis.
33:664-667[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2000, p. 449-452, Vol. 66, No. 1
0099-2240/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Petersen, L., Nielsen, E. M., Engberg, J., On, S. L. W., Dietz, H. H.
(2001). Comparison of Genotypes and Serotypes of Campylobacter jejuni Isolated from Danish Wild Mammals and Birds and from Broiler Flocks and Humans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
67: 3115-3121
[Abstract]
[Full Text]