Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2000, p. 80-86, Vol. 66, No. 1
0099-2240/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Antimicrobial Actions of Degraded and Native
Chitosan against Spoilage Organisms in Laboratory Media and
Foods
J.
Rhoades and
S.
Roller*
School of Applied Science, South Bank
University, London SE1 0AA, United Kingdom
Received 21 April 1999/Accepted 28 September 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The objective of this study was to determine whether chitosan
(poly-
-1,4-glucosamine) and hydrolysates of chitosan can be used as
novel preservatives in foods. Chitosan was hydrolyzed by using
oxidative-reductive degradation, crude papaya latex, and lysozyme. Mild
hydrolysis of chitosan resulted in improved microbial inactivation in
saline and greater inhibition of growth of several spoilage yeasts in
laboratory media, but highly degraded products of chitosan exhibited no
antimicrobial activity. In pasteurized apple-elderflower juice stored
at 7°C, addition of 0.3 g of chitosan per liter eliminated
yeasts entirely for the duration of the experiment (13 days), while the
total counts and the lactic acid bacterial counts increased at a slower
rate than they increased in the control. Addition of 0.3 or 1.0 g
of chitosan per kg had no effect on the microbial flora of houmous, a
chickpea dip; in the presence of 5.0 g of chitosan per kg,
bacterial growth but not yeast growth was substantially reduced
compared with growth in control dip stored at 7°C for 6 days.
Improved antimicrobial potency of chitosan hydrolysates like that
observed in the saline and laboratory medium experiments was not
observed in juice and dip experiments. We concluded that native
chitosan has potential for use as a preservative in certain types of
food but that the increase in antimicrobial activity that occurs
following partial hydrolysis is too small to justify the extra
processing involved.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Chitosan (poly-
-1,4-glucosamine)
is prepared commercially by alkaline deacetylation of chitin obtained
from the exoskeletons of marine crustaceans (6, 17).
Chitosan has a pKa value of approximately 6.3 (18); at lower pH values, the molecule is cationic due to
protonation of the amino groups. Previous reports have indicated that
when chitosan is dissolved in saline, distilled water, or laboratory
media, it exhibits antimicrobial activity against some strains of
filamentous fungi (2, 9, 15), yeasts (15, 18),
and bacteria (21). Considerable variation in the MICs and/or
minimum bactericidal concentrations of chitosan, both between and
within genera, has been described. Nevertheless, on the basis of the
available evidence, bacteria appear to be generally less sensitive to
the antimicrobial action of chitosan than fungi are. The antifungal
activity of chitosan is greater at lower pH values (15).
Chitosan has a mean molecular mass of up to 1 MDa, which corresponds to
a chain length of approximately 5,000 U, but there is considerable
variation between commercial batches. There is limited in vitro
evidence which suggests that partial depolymerization may enhance the
antimicrobial activity of chitosan against phytopathogenic fungi and
some bacteria of medical significance. For example, Uchida et al.
(20) produced chitosan hydrolysates with total reducing
sugar (TRS) contents of 50, 508, and 590 mg/g by using Bacillus chitosanase. The antifungal activities of the
hydrolysates were tested on solid laboratory media at pH 6 by using
three Fusarium spp. isolates. The MIC (around 0.4 g/liter)
of the mildly hydrolyzed chitosan (TRS content, 50 mg/g) was
approximately one-half the MIC of the native chitosan. The most highly
degraded hydrolysate (TRS content, 590 mg/g) was not effective at a
concentration of 10 g/liter, the highest concentration tested. The same
chitosan preparations were also tested by using four bacteria in liquid laboratory media. The native chitosan and the mildly hydrolyzed chitosan (TRS content, 50 mg/g) were equally inhibitory for
Escherichia coli, but the hydrolysate was more active
against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus
subtilis, and Staphylococcus aureus than the native chitosan.
In another study, Kendra and Hadwiger (9) determined the
extent to which the degree of polymerization of chitosan could be
reduced before antifungal activity was adversely affected. Chitosan
oligomers were prepared by digesting chitosan with 6 N HCl and were
separated on a Fractogel size exclusion column. The oligomers were
tested at a range of concentrations in liquid medium by using two
strains of the plant pathogen Fusarium solani. The shortest
oligomer which exhibited the maximum antifungal activity was the
heptamer. Antimicrobial activity then decreased with chain length, and
the dimer and trimer of N-acetylglucosamine were inactive. The results of Hirano and Nagao (7) also suggested that
low-molecular-weight chitosan in an agar system inhibited a range of
phytopathogenic fungi more effectively than high-molecular-weight
chitosan inhibited the organisms, although low-molecular-weight
chitosan was not defined.
Most reports on the antimicrobial effects of hydrolyzed chitosan have
focused on plant-pathogenic fungi and a few bacteria that have medical
significance. The effectiveness of chitosan hydrolysates against
food-associated microorganisms in vitro or in foods has not been
reported previously.
Several enzymic and chemical methods for producing chitosan oligomers
have been described. The chemical methods include acid hydrolysis with
either cold nitrous acid (16) or hot hydrochloric acid
(9); both of these methods involve rather long and harsh treatments. Nordtveit et al. (11) used hydrogen peroxide,
which, in the presence of Fe(III), generates hydroxyl radicals which cleave the molecule by nucleophilic attack. Enzymes from a variety of
sources have also been used for chitosan degradation. Lysozyme from
hens' eggs has been investigated and has been shown to be most
efficacious when the chitosan is only partially deacetylated (11,
12). Chitosan-degrading enzymes have been isolated from diverse
bacteria, including Streptomyces griseus, Bacillus
circulans, and members of the actinomycetes (4, 13,
22). Chitosan-degrading enzymes can also be isolated from
vegetable sources. Latex sap from Carica papaya contains
lysozyme (10), as well as chitinase enzymes (3).
Papaya latex itself has been reported to exhibit antifungal activity
against Candida albicans (5).
We found that few studies of chitosan and chitosan hydrolysates have
been concerned with inhibition of food-borne microorganisms in real
food systems. The objective of this study was to investigate the
antimicrobial activity of degraded and native chitosans against spoilage microorganisms in foods and beverages, as well as in laboratory systems, in order to assess their potential for use as novel
food preservatives.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Materials.
Chitosan hydrochloride was obtained from Pronova
Biopolymer (Drammen, Norway). The chloride content was 15.6%, and the
degree of acetylation was 0.11 (data provided by the manufacturer). All microbiological media and diluents (maximum recovery diluent) were
obtained from Oxoid Ltd. (Basingstoke, United Kingdom), and chemicals
were obtained from Sigma Chemical Company Ltd. unless otherwise
indicated. Pasteurized apple-elderflower juice and houmous (a dip
containing pureed chickpeas, vegetable oil [fat content, 25.9%],
sesame seed pulp, lemon juice, water, salt, and garlic) were purchased
from the chill cabinets of a local retailer.
Microorganisms and cultivation.
The microorganisms used in
this study included Saccharomyces cerevisiae 3085 from
spoiled fruit juice and Zygosaccharomyces bailii 906 from a
spoiled carbonated beverage; both of these strains were gifts from
Pepsico International (Valhalla, N.Y.). Saccharomycodes ludwigii, an isolate from spoiled cider, was a gift from Ron Board (University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom). Pseudomonas
fragi, an isolate from spoiled meat, was obtained from the
Leatherhead Food Research Association, Leatherhead, United Kingdom.
Cryptococcus albidus and Bacillus sp. were
isolated in our laboratory from a tomato-based dip, Candida
sp. was isolated from houmous, and Rhodotorula sp. was
isolated from a mayonnaise-based dip; our own isolates were identified
by using API biochemical profile strips (Biomerieux, Marcy l'Etoile,
France). The bacteria were cultured on plate count agar (PCA) and in
nutrient broth, while the yeasts were cultured on malt extract agar and
in malt extract broth supplemented with 2.5 g of glucose per liter (MEBG).
Degradation of chitosan.
The following three methods were
used to degrade chitosan: oxidative-reductive degradation with hydrogen
peroxide and iron(III), treatment with crude papaya latex, and
hydrolysis with lysozyme.
In the oxidative-reductive method (11), 5.0 g of
chitosan hydrochloride per liter was dissolved in 1.0% (vol/vol)
acetic acid. Aliquots (8.5 ml) of the chitosan solution were mixed with 1.0 ml of 10 mM aqueous FeCl3. Hydrogen peroxide (1 M) was
added to final concentrations of 0.0, 0.05, 0.2, 1.0, 5.0, 10.0, 25.0, and 50.0 mM, and the volume of each reaction mixture was increased to
10.0 ml by using distilled water. After 18 h of incubation at the
ambient temperature, the viscosity of each mixture was measured by
using a U-tube viscometer at 25°C. Samples were drawn up above the
upper etched line of the glass tube of the viscometer and were allowed
to fall due to gravity. The interval between the time that the meniscus
of a sample crossed the upper etched line and the time that the
meniscus crossed the lower etched line was measured in seconds.
Distilled water was used as a blank, and its viscosity was subtracted
from all experimental measurements. Degraded chitosan solutions were
stored at 4°C for no more than 24 h before antimicrobial
activity was tested.
Freeze-dried crude papaya latex powder (catalog no. P3250; Sigma
Chemical Company Ltd.) was dissolved in distilled water at
a
concentration of 2.0 g/liter and was filtered through Whatman
no. 1 paper. A 5.0-g/liter solution of chitosan hydrochloride
was prepared in
10 mM acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.5).
The papaya latex and
chitosan solutions were mixed at a 1:4 ratio
and then allowed to stand
at room temperature for 20 h. Our initial
investigations showed
that the reduction in viscosity followed
first-order kinetics; rapid
hydrolysis occurred within the first
10 min, and this was followed by a
slower but steady reaction
for up to 20 h. The degraded chitosan
solution was autoclaved
and stored at 4°C for no more than 24 h
before antimicrobial activity
was
tested.
Lysozyme from the albumen of hens' eggs (catalog no. L6876; Sigma
Chemical Company Ltd.), which had an activity of 50,000
U/mg of protein
(1 U was defined as the amount of enzyme that
produced a change in
absorbance at 450 nm of 0.001 U per min in
2.6 ml of a suspension of
Micrococcus luteus at pH 6.24 and 25°C
in a cuvette with a
1-cm light path), was dissolved in 0.1 M potassium
chloride and added
to a solution containing 2.5 g of chitosan
hydrochloride per liter
in 10 mM acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer
(pH 4.5) so that the final
enzyme concentration was 0.025% (wt/vol).
The reaction mixture was
stirred at room temperature, and samples
were taken periodically for up
to 10 min in order to determine
the viscosity with a U-tube viscometer
as described above. Samples
were boiled for 30 min to inactivate the
enzyme and were stored
at 4°C for no more than 24 h before
antimicrobial activity was
tested.
Evaluation of antimicrobial activity in vitro.
Experiments
to determine inactivation in saline solutions (9.0 g of NaCl per liter
in distilled water, pH 6.4) were carried out by using
Candida sp., Rhodotorula sp., C. albidus, P. fragi, and Bacillus sp. Native
chitosan and chitosan hydrolyzed by papaya latex were used for these
inactivation experiments. Cultures were grown to the stationary phase
(for up to 3 days, depending on the growth rate of the organism) in
MEBG at 25°C (yeasts) or in nutrient broth at 30°C (bacteria). The
cells were washed three times by using centrifugation and a sterile
saline solution to remove the residual culture medium. Washed cells
were added to sterile saline solutions at 25°C, and the viable counts
were determined before the antimicrobial agent was added. Yeasts were
enumerated on malt extract agar plates that were incubated at 25°C
for 5 days, and bacteria were enumerated on PCA plates that were
incubated at 30°C for 3 days. Native and degraded chitosan solutions
that had been autoclaved at 121°C for 15 min were added to the cell suspensions at final concentrations of 0.5 g/liter for yeasts and 1.0 g/liter for bacteria. Samples were removed periodically for up to
1 h, and viable counts were determined as described above. When we
calculated viable count values, the initial counts were adjusted to
compensate for the volume changes resulting from addition of the
chitosan solutions.
Inhibition of growth of microorganisms by chitosan and chitosan
hydrolysates produced by using hydrogen peroxide or lysozyme
was
assessed by using MEBG (pH 5.5) and monitoring absorbance
at 620 nm.
Aliquots (250 µl) of sterile MEBG containing the required
concentration of chitosan were dispensed into wells containing
either
30 µl of an overnight culture of a test organism or 30
µl of
sterile MEBG alone (blanks). Inoculated wells were prepared
in
quintuplicate, and blanks were prepared in triplicate. Inocula
were
first counted with a hemocytometer and then diluted with
MEBG so that
the final inoculum contained 10
5 cells/ml. The microtiter
plates were incubated at 25°C for up
to 5 days, and we measured the
absorbance of the wells periodically
at 620 nm after 1 min of shaking
by using an automated plate reader
(Dynatech, Chantilly, Va.). For each
sample, the mean value obtained
for the blanks was subtracted from the
mean value obtained for
the inoculated
wells.
Evaluation of antimicrobial activities in beverages and
foods.
Sterile native chitosan and degraded chitosan (hydrolyzed
by papaya latex) were added to pasteurized apple-elderflower juice at a
final concentration of 0.3 g/liter. The juice was stored at 7°C for
up to 13 days and was tested periodically by spread plating to
determine the total viable count (on PCA), the lactic acid bacterial
count (on de Man-Rogosa-Sharpe agar), and the yeast count (on
oxytetracycline-glucose-yeast extract agar). All microbiological media
were obtained from Oxoid Ltd. The agar plates were incubated aerobically at 25°C for 5 days. The PCA and
oxytetracycline-glucose-yeast extract agar plates were incubated
aerobically, while the de Man-Rogosa-Sharpe agar plates were placed in
candle jars in order to provide a
low-O2-high-CO2 atmosphere.
We also investigated the antimicrobial effects of chitosan and chitosan
hydrolysates (produced by using papaya latex) at concentrations
of 0.3, 1.0, and 5.0 g/kg in houmous (see above). Duplicate houmous
samples
were stored at 7°C for 6 days and were tested periodically
to
determine the total viable count, the lactic acid bacterial
count, and
the yeast count as described above for the juice
experiments.
 |
RESULTS |
Preparation of chitosan hydrolysates.
Oxidative-reductive
depolymerization of chitosan with hydrogen peroxide in the presence of
iron(III) produced several chitosan hydrolysates, and the viscosities
obtained ranged from >800 s for native chitosan to <9 s for the
highly degraded samples. Overnight treatment of chitosan with crude
papaya latex also resulted in degraded forms of chitosan with
viscosities as low as 87 s. Depolymerized chitosan with a viscosity of
140 s was also obtained by using lysozyme. However, boiling for up to
30 min failed to inactivate lysozyme, and thus it was difficult to
obtain chitosan oligomers with intermediate viscosities (and hence
intermediate sizes). Consequently, all samples were ultimately degraded
to the same extent as the enzyme continued to depolymerize the chitosan
during the heating procedure.
Inactivation of microorganisms in saline solutions.
The
antimicrobial activities of native chitosan and degraded chitosan in
saline solutions (pH 6.4) were assessed by using the following five
target organisms: Candida sp., Rhodotorula sp.,
P. fragi, Bacillus sp., and C. albidus. Neither native chitosan nor degraded chitosan at a
concentration of 1 g/liter inactivated the latter three organisms.
Approximately 2 log CFU of Candida sp. per ml was
inactivated by 0.5 g of native chitosan per liter or 0.5 g of
degraded chitosan per liter (Fig. 1A). In
contrast, the level of inactivation of Rhodotorula sp. in
the presence of 1 g of native chitosan per liter was low (0.5 log
CFU/ml), but the level of inactivation in the presence of the same
concentration of degraded chitosan was 1 log CFU/ml (Fig. 1B). Figure 1
shows that chitosan degraded with papaya latex exhibited somewhat
greater antimicrobial activity than native chitosan, but the effect was not great.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Inactivation of Candida sp. (A) and
Rhodotorula sp. (B) in saline solutions at 25°C ( ), in
the presence of 0.5 g of native chitosan per liter ( ), and in
the presence of 0.5 g of a chitosan hydrolysate per liter prepared by
using papaya latex ( ).
|
|
Inhibition of yeast growth in laboratory media.
The inhibitory
activities of native chitosan and chitosan hydrolysates prepared by
oxidative-reductive degradation were assessed by using the following
concentrations: 0.2 g/liter for S. ludwigii (Fig.
2) and 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 g/liter for
Z. bailii (Fig. 3) and
S. cerevisiae (Fig. 4). These
experiments were performed with MEBG at room temperature by using
absorbance to measure growth. In addition to the results shown in Fig.
2 through 4, growth curves for controls containing only MEBG, only
N-acetylglucosamine, only FeCl3, and
N-acetylglucosamine plus hydrogen peroxide were obtained for
all three spoilage yeasts; since the growth data for all of the control
cultures were very similar, not all of the results are shown in Fig. 2
to 4 in order to keep the presentation clear.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Growth of S. ludwigii in laboratory media at
25°C in the presence of no chitosan (control) ( ), 0.2 g of
native chitosan per liter ( ), and chitosan hydrolysates with
viscosities of 96 s ( ), 24 s ( ), 17 s ( ), and 9 s ( ). The
hydrolysates were prepared by the oxidative-reductive degradation
method. The results are means based on five replicate values for
absorbance at 620 nm (A620). Bars indicate standard
error.
|
|

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Growth of Z. bailii in laboratory media at
25°C in the presence of native chitosan ( ) and hydrolyzed chitosan
at concentrations of 0.1 g/liter (A), 0.2 g/liter (B), and 0.3 g/liter
(C). The viscosities of the hydrolysates were 154 s ( ), 96 s ( ),
54 s ( ), 11 s ( ), and 0 s for the control containing
N-acetylglucosamine plus hydrogen peroxide ( ). The
hydrolysates were prepared by the oxidative-reductive degradation
method. The results are means based on five replicate values for
absorbance at 620 nm (A620). Bars indicate standard
error.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Growth of S. cerevisiae in laboratory media
at 25°C in the presence of native chitosan ( ) and hydrolyzed
chitosan at concentrations of 0.1 g/liter (A), 0.2 g/liter (B), and 0.3 g/liter (C). The viscosities of the hydrolysates were 154 s ( ), 96 s
( ), 54 s ( ), 11 s ( ), and 0 s for the control containing
N-acetylglucosamine plus hydrogen peroxide ( ). The
hydrolysates were prepared by the oxidative-reductive degradation
method. The results are means based on five replicate values for
absorbance at 620 nm (A620). Bars indicate standard
error.
|
|
Overall, Figures
2 to
4 show that extensive degradation of chitosan to
a viscosity of 11s or less (compared with 802s for
the native polymer)
resulted in a complete loss of inhibitory
activity against all three
spoilage yeasts. Hydrolysates with
viscosities of 17 s and 24 s
exhibited some antimicrobial activity
but inhibited growth of
S. ludwigii less than native chitosan
inhibited growth of this
organism (Fig.
2). Sensitivity to the
antimicrobial action of the
hydrolysate with a viscosity of 54
s depended on the target organism,
and
S. cerevisiae was less
sensitive than
Z. bailii at concentrations of 0.2 g/liter (Fig.
3B and
4B) and 0.3 g/liter (Fig.
3C and
4C). In general, the hydrolysates
with viscosities
of 96 s and 154 s were more effective in inhibiting
the growth of all
three spoilage organisms than native chitosan
was. In most cases, the
hydrolysates with viscosities of >96 s
completely prevented growth of
all three target organisms for
the duration of the experiments (5 days). Notably, all of the
hydrolysates except the very highly degraded
11 s hydrolysate
inhibited growth of
Z. bailii and
S. cerevisiae at a concentration
of 0.3 g/liter (Fig.
3C and
4C).
Figure
5A shows that growth of
Z. bailii was completely inhibited in the presence of 0.1 g of
lysozyme-degraded chitosan per
liter for up to 4 days, while growth
occurred in the presence
of native chitosan, albeit at a slower rate
than in the control
preparation. Autoclaved lysozyme alone had no
effect on the growth
of the organism, but when native chitosan and
autoclaved lysozyme
were added together, they completely inhibited
growth for the
duration of the experiment (4 days). These results
differed from
the results shown in Fig.
3A, which shows that
Z. bailii growth
was largely unaffected by the presence of 0.1 g
of native chitosan
per liter or 0.1 g of hydrolysates per liter
prepared by the oxidative-reductive
depolymerization method. In
contrast,
S. cerevisiae growth was
not inhibited in the
presence of 0.1 g of chitosan per liter,
whether the chitosan was
in the native form or was degraded by
either oxidative-reductive
depolymerization or lysozyme (Fig.
4A and
5B).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Growth of Z. bailii (A) and S. cerevisiae (B) in laboratory media at 25°C in the presence of
0.1 g of native chitosan per liter ( ) and lysozyme-degraded
chitosan ( ). The controls consisted of unsupplemented laboratory
medium ( ), autoclaved lysozyme ( ), and chitosan plus autoclaved
lysozyme ( ). The results are means based on five replicate values
for absorbance at 620 nm (A620). Bars indicate standard
error.
|
|
Inhibition of spoilage in beverages and foods.
We assessed the
antimicrobial activities of native chitosan and degraded chitosan
against the natural microbial flora in a beverage (pasteurized
apple-elderflower juice, pH 3.3) and in houmous (a popular
chickpea-based dip, pH 4.2). Both products are sold refrigerated and
have a relatively short shelf life once they are opened. These products
were selected as model foods due to their low pH values and relative
homogeneity (which allowed easy mixing with chitosan). As shown in Fig.
6, the total counts, lactic acid
bacterial counts, and yeast counts in the apple-elderflower juice were
reduced from the initial level (about 3 to 4 log CFU/ml) to a level
below the sensitivity limit of the plating technique when either native
or degraded chitosan was added at a concentration of 0.3 g/liter. After
4 days of storage at 7°C (this temperature was selected to represent
domestic refrigeration conditions), the total counts and the lactic
acid bacterial counts were approximately 2 log CFU/ml lower in the
chitosan-supplemented juice samples than in the control samples;
however, after 8 days, there were no differences in the total and
lactic acid bacterial counts between the controls and the
chitosan-supplemented samples (both reached a maximum population size
of around 7 log CFU/ml). In contrast, yeast growth was completely
suppressed; the levels of yeast were below the sensitivity limit of the
plating technique for nearly 2 weeks in juice supplemented with
chitosan (Fig. 6C). No substantial differences between the
antimicrobial activities of native chitosan and degraded chitosan were
noted.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Effects of native chitosan and degraded chitosan at a
concentration of 0.3 g/liter on the natural flora of apple-elderflower
juice stored at 7°C. The total mesophilic organisms (A), lactic acid
bacteria (B), and yeasts (C) were enumerated on selective media.
Symbols: , juice alone; , juice treated with native chitosan;
, juice treated with chitosan degraded with papaya latex. The
results are means based on duplicate viable count values.
|
|
Native chitosan and degraded chitosan added at concentrations of 0.3 and 1.0 g/kg had no detectable effect on the development
of the natural
microflora of houmous (pH 4.2) stored at 7°C (results
not shown).
However, at a concentration of 5.0 g/kg, both native
chitosan and
degraded chitosan inhibited the growth of the total
flora in general
(Fig.
7A) and of lactic acid bacteria in
particular
(Fig.
7B). After 6 days of storage, the total viable counts
and
the lactic acid bacterial counts in the chitosan-containing samples
were approximately 4 log CFU/g lower than the counts in the control
(Fig.
7A and B). Notably, the yeast population was not affected
by
chitosan (either native or degraded), although the overall
counts were
generally low compared with the total counts and the
lactic acid
bacterial counts (Fig.
7C). We detected no differences
in the counts
for any of the microorganisms tested when we compared
samples treated
with native chitosan and samples treated with
degraded
chitosan.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Effects of native chitosan and degraded chitosan at a
concentration of 5.0 g/liter on the natural flora of a houmous-water
slurry stored at 7°C. Total mesophilic organisms (A), lactic acid
bacteria (B), and yeasts (C) were enumerated on selective media.
Symbols: , houmous alone; , houmous treated with native chitosan;
, houmous treated with chitosan degraded with papaya latex. The
results are means based on duplicate viable count values.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The inactivation experiments performed in simple saline
solutions at pH 6.4 showed that Bacillus sp., P. fragi, and C. albidus were not sensitive to chitosan or
chitosan degradation products at the limited number of concentrations
tested in this study. Since some bacteria have been shown to exhibit
sensitivity to the biocidal action of chitosan in relatively clean
systems, such as buffers and distilled water (14, 21), it is
possible that greater bacterial inactivation rates might have been
observed in this study if higher concentrations of chitosan had been tested.
In contrast, the initial rapid decrease in the Candida sp.
population (Fig. 1A) suggested that exposure to chitosan either rapidly
killed the cells or rendered the cells nonculturable in a short time
(i.e., less than 2 min). The surviving cells may have been members of a
more resistant subpopulation or may have survived because much of the
chitosan had been removed from solution by binding to the other cells
or both. Interpretation of experimental results in terms of cell death
is hampered by the lack of definitive information concerning the
kinetics of chitosan-cell interactions and the mode of chitosan
antimicrobial action.
Whereas the Candida sp. was affected equally by native
chitosan and hydrolyzed chitosan, Rhodotorula sp. (Fig. 1B)
was inactivated to a greater extent by degraded chitosan than by native
chitosan. However, the antimicrobial activity observed with the
degraded polymer was not extraordinarily greater. Additional simple
saline-based inactivation experiments were not performed as we thought
that results obtained with nutrient-deficient experimental systems were
a poor indication of likely microbial responses to preservatives in the
nutrient-rich environments found in most foods and beverages.
The results shown in Fig. 2 to 5 suggest that mild hydrolysis of
chitosan enhanced the inhibitory activity of chitosan against some
species of spoilage yeasts grown in complex laboratory media. Thus, we
estimated that for Z. bailii, mild hydrolysis of chitosan decreased the MIC by a factor of about 2 (Fig. 3). However, highly degraded forms of chitosan exhibited no antimicrobial activity; this
observation emphasized the importance of maintaining strict control
over the process conditions used during chitosan degradation (Fig. 2 to
4). These results agree with the results of other authors obtained with
nonfood organisms, such as the plant-pathogenic organisms
Fusarium spp. (9, 20).
Degradation of chitosan by hydrogen peroxide differs fundamentally from
enzymic depolymerization in three important respects. First, the
chemical method is a random process, while enzymic attack is nonrandom
and bond specific. Second, chitosan can be completely degraded to its
constituent monomers by chemical methods provided that the reagents are
present in excess amounts, as shown by the almost total loss of
viscosity relative to water of the most highly hydrolyzed samples
prepared in this study (viscosity, 11 s) (Fig. 2 to 4). In contrast,
hexamers containing three or four acetylated residues must be present
to initiate the lysozyme hydrolysis reaction (11, 12), and
so lysozyme cannot be used to degrade chitosan completely, as shown by
the generally higher viscosities obtained for the lysozyme-degraded
chitosans in this study. Third, the hydroxyl radicals generated from
hydrogen peroxide may react with parts of the chitosan molecule other
than the
-1,4 linkage to form oligomers with nonnative oxidized
groups. In this study, it was not possible to establish whether the
improvement in the antimicrobial potency of chitosan degraded by
hydrogen peroxide was due to variation in the degree of polymerization or to the presence of oxidized groups on the oligomers. It is possible
that oxidation increased the biological activity of the polymer, while
excessive hydrolysis of the polymeric backbone resulted in a loss of
activity. The most active hydrolysates may represent the optimum
balance between these two factors. In contrast, enzyme-degraded
chitosan would not be expected to contain oxidized groups.
In more general terms, using hydrogen peroxide to degrade chitosan
could be problematic in terms of potential toxicity and product
licensing. The oligomers prepared by this method would probably need to
be purified further to remove the excess iron, which could lead to
off-flavors in foods. Additional processing of this nature would lead
to extra costs for the ingredient manufacturer, the food processor, and
ultimately the consumer. Enzymic methods of depolymerization may, in
this context, provide a more "natural" and cheaper means of
producing oligomers of chitosan. Lysozyme is readily available and is
used as a food preservative in its own right to guard against
clostridial spoilage of hard-cooked cheeses (8).
Although a degraded form of chitosan was successfully produced in this
study by using lysozyme, oligomers having intermediate viscosities (and
therefore intermediate molecular weights) could not be prepared because
it was difficult to inactivate the enzyme by conventional heating
methods. Nevertheless, increased antimicrobial activity of
lysozyme-degraded chitosan against Z. bailii in laboratory media was observed (Fig. 5A), although we could not entirely rule out
the possibility that the lysozyme in the oligomer preparation played a
role in the inhibition of the organism.
Lysozymes are found in many plants, animals, and microorganisms
(10, 19), and papaya latex is only one of many possible alternative sources of the enzyme. The enzyme structure differs slightly depending on source, and different structures can be expected
to lead to different heat stabilities. Unlike the depolymerizing activity of lysozyme from hens' eggs, the depolymerizing activity of
papaya latex can be arrested by heating by using conventional laboratory techniques (1). Papaya latex also contains other enzymes, such as papain, and has itself been reported to exhibit antifungal activity against C. albicans (5).
In this study, both native chitosan and papaya-degraded chitosan
inactivated the natural yeast population of pasteurized
apple-elderflower juice stored at 7°C to the extent that the
organisms could not be detected for up to 2 weeks when conventional
plating techniques were used (Fig. 6). These results are in agreement
with the results of previous work that demonstrated that several
spoilage yeasts were very sensitive to chitosan in clear
ultrahigh-temperature-processed apple juice spiked with each organism
individually and stored at room temperature (15).
Although the total counts and the lactic acid bacterial counts in the
apple-elderflower juice were reduced by about 2 log CFU/ml immediately
after exposure to chitosan, some of the remaining viable organisms
appeared to recover and to resume growing at the same rate as the
organisms in the control culture containing no added chitosan (Fig. 6A
and B). It is possible that chitosan was irreversibly bound by some of
the microbial cells, particulates, or negatively charged compounds
present in the juice and thus rendered inactive against the remaining
unbound microorganisms.
We noted that much higher concentrations of chitosan were required to
inhibit microbial growth in houmous (5 g/kg) than in apple-elderflower
juice (0.3 g/liter) in spite of the lower initial microbial load in
houmous (<102 CFU/ml) than in juice (<104
CFU/ml). It is possible that the more particulate nature of the dip
compared with the juice restricted mass transfer of the relatively large, polymeric chitosan molecules, which reduced the chance of
contact with a microbial cell in the houmous. In addition, a number of
other factors, such as pH (pH 4.2 in houmous and pH 3.3 in juice), fat
content (25.6% fat in houmous and no fat in juice), and type of acid
present (citric acid from the lemon juice in houmous and malic acid in
apple juice), may have contributed to the differences in the
antimicrobial activities of chitosan. In both juice and houmous, the
activities of native chitosan and hydrolyzed chitosan did not differ.
Conclusions.
Chitosan has potential for use as a preservative
in low-pH foods, either alone or in combination with other preservative
systems. The constituents of the food matrix appear to have an
important effect on the antimicrobial efficacy of chitosan, and this
observation should be investigated further. Mild depolymerization of
chitosan may slightly enhance its antimicrobial action, but the
improvement is not considered sufficient to justify the extra
processing steps involved.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was carried out with the support of the European
Union's FAIR Programme (contract CT96-1066) and with the sponsorship of Aplin and Barrett Ltd. (United Kingdom), CPC International (United
Kingdom), Gist-brocades (The Netherlands), the Meat and Livestock
Commission (United Kingdom), and Norsk Hydro (Norway).
We thank Kim Ilsley for technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: School of
Applied Science, South Bank University, 103 Borough Road, London SE1
0AA, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 171 815 7961. Fax: 44 171 815 6280. E-mail: rollers{at}sbu.ac.uk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ahern, T. J., and A. M. Klibanov.
1985.
The mechanism of irreversible enzyme inactivation at 100°C.
Science
228:1280-1284[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Allan, C. R., and L. A. Hadwiger.
1979.
The fungicidal effect of chitosan on fungi of varying cell wall composition.
Exp. Mycol.
3:285-287.
|
| 3.
|
Azarkan, M.,
A. Amrani,
M. Nijs,
A. Vandermeers,
S. Zerhouni,
N. Smoulders, and Y. Looze.
1997.
Carica papaya latex is a rich source of class II chitinase.
Phytochemistry.
46:1319-1325[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Brzezinski, R.,
I. Boucher,
A. Dupuy, and B. Plouffe.
1997.
Actinomycetes as model organisms for the study of chitosanases, p. 291-296.
In
R. A. A. Muzzarelli, and M. G. Peter (ed.), Chitin handbook. European Chitin Society, Grottammare, Italy.
|
| 5.
|
Giordani, R.,
M. L. Cardenas,
J. Moulin-Traffort, and P. Régli.
1996.
Fungicidal activity of latex sap from Carica papaya and antifungal effect of D(+)-glucosamine on Candida albicans growth.
Mycoses
39:103-110[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Goosen, M. F. A. (ed.).
1997.
Applications of chitin and chitosan.
Technomic Publishing Co., Inc., Lancaster, Pa.
|
| 7.
|
Hirano, S., and N. Nagao.
1989.
Effects of chitosan, pectic acid, lysozyme, and chitinase on the growth of several phytopathogens.
Agric. Biol. Chem.
53:3065-3066.
|
| 8.
|
Johansen, C.,
L. Gram, and A. S. Meyer.
1994.
The combined inhibitory effect of lysozyme and low pH on growth of Listeria monocytogenes.
J. Food Prot.
57:561-566.
|
| 9.
|
Kendra, D. F., and L. A. Hadwiger.
1984.
Characterisation of the smallest chitosan oligomer that is maximally antifungal to Fusarium solani and elicits pisatin formation in Pisum sativum.
Exp. Mycol.
8:276-281.
|
| 10.
|
Lakhtin, V. M.,
E. A. Kostanova, and N. P. Arbatski.
1995.
Isolation and characterisation of multiple forms of papaya latex lysozyme.
Appl. Biochem. Microbiol.
31:214-220.
|
| 11.
|
Nordtveit, R. J.,
K. M. Vårum, and O. Smidsrød.
1994.
Degradation of fully water-soluble, partially N-acetylated chitosans with lysozyme.
Carbohydr. Polymers
23:253-260[CrossRef].
|
| 12.
|
Nordtveit, R. J.,
K. M. Vårum, and O. Smidsrød.
1996.
Degradation of partially N-acetylated chitosans with hen egg white and human lysozyme.
Carbohydr. Polymers
29:163-167[CrossRef].
|
| 13.
|
Ohtakara, A.,
H. Matsunaga, and M. Mitsutomi.
1990.
Action pattern of Streptomyces griseus chitinase on partially N-acetylated chitosan.
Agric. Biol. Chem.
54:3191-3199[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Papineau, A. M.,
D. G. Hoover,
D. Knorr, and D. F. Farkas.
1991.
Antimicrobial effect of water-soluble chitosans with high hydrostatic pressure.
Food Biotechnol.
5:45-57.
|
| 15.
|
Roller, S., and N. Covill.
1999.
The antifungal properties of chitosan in laboratory media and apple juice.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
47:67-77[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Sekiguchi, S.,
Y. Miura,
H. Kaneko,
S.-I. Nishimura,
N. Nishi,
M. Iwase, and S. Tokura.
1994.
Molecular weight dependency of antimicrobial activity by chitosan oligomers, p. 71-76.
In
K. Nishinari, and E. Doi (ed.), Food hydrocolloids: structures, properties, and functions. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 17.
|
Skjak-Braek, G.,
T. Anthonsen, and P. Sandford.
1989.
Chitin and chitosan.
Elsevier Applied Science, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 18.
|
Sudarshan, N. R.,
D. G. Hoover, and D. Knorr.
1992.
Antibacterial action of chitosan.
Food Biotechnol.
6:257-272.
|
| 19.
|
Tranter, H. S.
1994.
Lysozyme, ovotransferrin and avidin, p. 65-97.
In
V. M. Dillon, and R. G. Board (ed.), Natural antimicrobial systems and food preservation. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
|
| 20.
|
Uchida, Y.,
M. Izume, and A. Ohtakara.
1989.
Preparation of chitosan oligomers with purified chitosanase and its application, p. 373-382.
In
G. Skjåk-Br k, T. Anthonsen, and P. Sandford (ed.), Chitin and chitosan: sources, chemistry, biochemistry, physical properties and applications. Elsevier Applied Science, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 21.
|
Wang, G.-H.
1992.
Inhibition and inactivation of five species of foodborne pathogens by chitosan.
J. Food Prot.
55:916-919.
|
| 22.
|
Yabuki, M.
1989.
Characterisation of chitosanase produced by Bacillus circulans MH-K1, p. 197-206.
In
G. Skjåk-Br k, T. Anthonsen, and P. Sandford (ed.), Chitin and chitosan: sources, chemistry, biochemistry, physical properties and applications Elsevier Applied Science, London, United Kingdom.
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2000, p. 80-86, Vol. 66, No. 1
0099-2240/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Raafat, D., von Bargen, K., Haas, A., Sahl, H.-G.
(2008). Insights into the Mode of Action of Chitosan as an Antibacterial Compound. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 3764-3773
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zakrzewska, A., Boorsma, A., Delneri, D., Brul, S., Oliver, S. G., Klis, F. M.
(2007). Cellular Processes and Pathways That Protect Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cells against the Plasma Membrane-Perturbing Compound Chitosan. Eukaryot Cell
6: 600-608
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zakrzewska, A., Boorsma, A., Brul, S., Hellingwerf, K. J., Klis, F. M.
(2005). Transcriptional Response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the Plasma Membrane-Perturbing Compound Chitosan. Eukaryot Cell
4: 703-715
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gallaher, D. D., Gallaher, C. M., Mahrt, G. J., Carr, T. P., Hollingshead, C. H., Hesslink, R. Jr, Wise, J.
(2002). A Glucomannan and Chitosan Fiber Supplement Decreases Plasma Cholesterol and Increases Cholesterol Excretion in Overweight Normocholesterolemic Humans. J. Am. Coll. Nutr.
21: 428-433
[Abstract]
[Full Text]