Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2000, p. 4187-4192, Vol. 66, No. 10
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Urea Hydrogen Peroxide Reduces the Numbers of
Lactobacilli, Nourishes Yeast, and Leaves No Residues in the
Ethanol Fermentation
N. V.
Narendranath,
K. C.
Thomas, and
W. M.
Ingledew*
Department of Applied Microbiology and Food
Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada
Received 5 April 2000/Accepted 7 July 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Urea hydrogen peroxide (UHP) at a concentration of 30 to 32 mmol/liter reduced the numbers of five Lactobacillus spp.
(Lactobacillus plantarum, L. paracasei,
Lactobacillus sp. strain 3, L. rhamnosus, and
L. fermentum) from ~107 to ~102
CFU/ml in a 2-h preincubation at 30°C of normal-gravity wheat mash at
~21 g of dissolved solids per ml containing normal levels of
suspended grain particles. Fermentation was completed 36 h after
inoculation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the presence of
UHP, even when wheat mash was deliberately contaminated (infected) with
L. paracasei at ~107 CFU/ml. There were no
significant differences in the maximum ethanol produced between
treatments when urea hydrogen peroxide was used to kill the bacteria
and controls (in which no bacteria were added). However, the presence
of L. paracasei at ~107 CFU/ml without added
agent resulted in a 5.84% reduction in the maximum ethanol produced
compared to the control. The bactericidal activity of UHP is greatly
affected by the presence of particulate matter. In fact, only 2 mmol of
urea hydrogen peroxide per liter was required for disinfection when
mashes had little or no particulate matter present. No significant
differences were observed in the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide in
normal-gravity wheat mash at 30°C whether the bactericidal agent was
added as H2O2 or as urea hydrogen peroxide.
NADH peroxidase activity (involved in degrading
H2O2) increased significantly
(P = 0.05) in the presence of 0.75 mM hydrogen
peroxide (sublethal level) in all five strains of lactobacilli tested
but did not persist in cells regrown in the absence of
H2O2. H2O2-resistant
mutants were not expected or found when lethal levels of
H2O2 or UHP were used. Contaminating lactobacilli can be effectively managed by UHP, a compound which when
used at ca. 30 mmol/liter happens to provide near-optimum levels of
assimilable nitrogen and oxygen that aid in vigorous fermentation
performance by yeast.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Bacterial contamination is a major
cause for the reduction in yeast growth, yeast viability, and ethanol
yield during the fermentation of starch- or sugar-based feedstocks by
Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Lactic acid bacteria are the most
persistent contaminants because of their tolerance of ethanol, low pH,
and high temperature and their ability to therefore survive alcoholic
fermentation. Predominant contaminants isolated from distilleries and
fuel alcohol plants belong to the genus Lactobacillus. These
microbes are able to ferment carbohydrates for growth and energy
production, the latter leading to the production of lactic acid and
small amounts of acetic acid which cause reductions in both yeast
growth and ethanol yield (19). A number of commercially
isolated lactobacilli are extremely fast growing and are able to grow
in ethanol concentrations exceeding 10% (vol/vol) (10, 19).
The management of bacterial contaminants is often achieved
in industry by using antibiotics such as penicillin G, streptomycin, tetracycline (4, 9), virginiamycin, and monensin or mixtures of these compounds. Virginiamycin may be a better choice for treatment since this antibiotic, unlike penicillin, retains its activity at lower
pH values (10). However, antibiotics are expensive, and the
concept of antibiotic use in an industrial process is in question in
spite of the absence of antibiotic residues in spent grains subsequent
to distillation. General misuse of antibiotics in society has
contributed to a buildup of reservoirs of antibiotic-resistant bacteria
(17), providing an incentive to examine other antimicrobials which are not antibiotics.
The physiological differences between yeast and lactobacilli suggest
the use of hydrogen peroxide to manage these bacteria in mashes used
for alcoholic fermentations. Literature concerning the antibacterial
effects of hydrogen peroxide covers a period of more than 100 years.
Lactobacilli lack the enzyme catalase, which decomposes hydrogen
peroxide, and therefore are unable to eliminate its toxic effect. In an
attempt to evaluate sulfite and hydrogen peroxide as
bacterial-contamination control agents, Chang et al. (7)
have reported that the viability of Lactobacillus fermentum
could be selectively controlled by hydrogen peroxide at concentrations
of 1 to 10 mM in an ethanol fermentation process with cell recycling.
For maximal bactericidal activity, hydrogen peroxide should be
electrolytically pure and allowed to come into contact with only
stainless steel or other corrosion-resistant materials (18). At higher temperatures, bactericidal efficiency increases
(1). The stability of the compound also decreases as the pH
increases (18). Moreover, in contact with organic matter,
hydrogen peroxide breaks up into nascent oxygen and water. To avoid the
problem of instability, Banerjee (5) prepared a solid
compound containing hydrogen peroxide and urea in his laboratory and
claimed that this compound, urea hydrogen peroxide (UHP), was perfectly
stable in a dry state at ordinary temperatures. UHP has since been used as an antiseptic for topical application on wounds and against gingivitis and dental plaque (25).
Apart from bacterial contamination, "stuck" or sluggish
fermentations, common in the alcohol industry, lead to reductions in
ethanol yield. Stuck fermentations are most often caused by inadequate
levels of yeast nutrients that lead to a cessation of yeast growth with
a concomitant reduction in ethanol yield (12). Two such
nutrients usually deficient in fermentation mashes are usable
(assimilable) nitrogen and oxygen. Yeasts used in alcohol production
are not proteolytic and can use only low-molecular-weight nitrogenous
compounds such as ammonium ion, urea, amino acids, or dipeptides
(11, 20). Urea and liquid ammonia are being used in the fuel
alcohol industry as inexpensive sources of nitrogen for yeast
(12); diammonium phosphate is often added to must in wine
making. In addition to the requirement for usable nitrogen, oxygen is
required in small quantities for the synthesis of unsaturated fatty
acids and sterols, which are both essential components of the yeast
cell membrane (3). Unfortunately, oxygen is not available at
optimal levels due to industrial practices and its lower solubility in
mashes (12). Deficiencies of usable nitrogen and oxygen also affect the ethanol tolerance of yeast (12, 22). The
judicious use of nutrients can lead to the production of more than 23%
(vol/vol) ethanol by commercial yeast strains in batch fermentation
(22).
The use of UHP in fuel and industrial alcohol production offers the
advantages of providing yeast with a nitrogen source (in the form of
urea) and a supply of oxygen, in addition to its bactericidal activity
against lactic bacteria and other microbial contaminants in the mash.
This study therefore investigates the use of UHP to control
lactobacilli in the fermentation of starch-based feedstock (wheat mash)
by yeast.
(This work is covered by U.S. patent application 09/271,877 [W.
M. Ingledew, K. C. Thomas, and N. V. Narendranath, 18 March 1999, U.S. Patent Office] and Canadian patent application 2,300,807 [W. M. Ingledew, K. C. Thomas, and N. V. Narendranath,
17 March 2000, Canadian Patent Office].)
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Organisms.
An industrial strain of Saccharomyces
cerevisiae (Allyeast Superstart; Alltech, Inc., Nicholasville,
Ky.) was used. Five species of industrially important lactobacilli
capable of extensive growth in mash within 36 h at 30°C and
tolerance to >10% (vol/vol) ethanol were used. Two species were
obtained from the Centro de Technologia Copersucar, Piracicaba,
São Paulo, Brazil, and were tentatively identified to the species
level and numbered biotype by API 50 CHL test kits (bioMérieux,
Montreal, Quebec, Canada) as L. plantarum 1 and L. paracasei subsp. paracasei 2 (referred to here as
L. paracasei). Two other strains, L. rhamnosus
(ATCC 15280) and L. fermentum (ATCC 14931), were obtained
from the American Type Culture Collection. The fifth strain was an
industrial isolate labeled Cargill 3 from Cargill Corn Milling
(Eddyville, Iowa). An API 50 CHL test kit for Lactobacillus
identified this latter strain as L. paracasei subsp.
paracasei 2, but it differed in microscopic and colony
morphology compared to the L. paracasei strain obtained from
Copersucar. Therefore, for the purposes of this study, we used the
designation Lactobacillus sp. strain 3.
Preparation of inocula. (i) Yeast.
Eleven grams of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae active dry yeast was dispersed into
99 ml of prewarmed (38°C), sterile, 0.1% (wt/vol) peptone water and
incubated at 38°C for 20 min with periodic shaking. Aliquots (0.25 ml) of this suspension were added to each fermentor to obtain
~106 viable yeast cells/ml.
(ii) Bacteria.
Lactobacilli were grown in 50 ml of MRS broth
(Unipath, Nepean, Ontario, Canada) contained in 250-ml screw-capped
side-arm Erlenmeyer flasks. Then, 4 ml of late-log-phase cultures was
transferred to 1-liter screw-capped flasks containing 200 ml of MRS
broth. The headspace of each flask was flushed with filter-sterilized (0.22-µm-pore-size membrane filter) CO2 gas, and the
flasks were incubated in a G25 Controlled Environmental shaker (New
Brunswick Scientific Co., Inc., Edison, N.J.) at 150 rpm and at 30°C.
Growth of these organisms was monitored by measuring absorbance using a
Klett-Summerson colorimeter (Klett Manufacturing Co., New York, N.Y.)
equipped with a no. 66 red filter (420 to 660 nm), and the time for
growth to early stationary phase was determined. A relationship between
Klett units and the number of CFU per milliliter in mid-log-phase cultures was established for each strain. Bacterial cells from 1,000-ml
cultures were aseptically harvested by centrifugation at 10,200 × g for 15 min at 4°C. The pellets were washed twice with
sterile 0.1% (wt/vol) peptone water (Difco Laboratories, Detroit,
Mich.), and the cells were then resuspended in 50 ml of sterile 0.1%
(wt/vol) peptone water and chilled in ice until they were dispensed.
Viable cell count.
Viable cell counts were monitored by the
membrane filtration technique (14). For enumeration of yeast
cells, the membranes were incubated aerobically at 30°C for 48 h
on the surface of YPD plates (10 g of yeast extract per liter, 10 g of peptone per liter, 20 g of dextrose per liter, 15 g of
agar per liter) supplemented with 0.005% (wt/vol) gentamicin and
0.01% (wt/vol) oxytetracycline (Sigma Chemical Co.) to suppress the
growth of bacteria. The plating was done in triplicate for each
dilution used.
For enumeration of bacteria, membrane-filtered samples were placed on
plates of MRS agar containing 0.001% cycloheximide (Sigma Chemical
Co.) to inhibit the growth of yeast and incubated in a CO2
incubator (National Appliance Co., Portland, Oreg.) at 30°C for
48 h after two cycles of evacuating and refilling the chamber with
commercial-grade (>99.5%) CO2. The results were expressed as CFU per milliliter.
Mashing of wheat.
Normal-gravity (~21 g of dissolved
solids/100 ml) wheat mash (with particulates left in the mash) was
prepared as described by Narendranath et al. (19).
Determination of dissolved solids.
Portions of samples were
centrifuged at 10,300 × g for 30 min, and the
supernatants were collected and stored at
20°C until analyzed.
Total dissolved solids in these supernatants were determined by
measuring the specific gravity at 20°C with a DMA45 density meter
(Anton Parr KG, Graz, Austria). The readings were converted to grams of
dissolved solids per 100 ml.
Determination of the most suitable concentration of UHP.
Wheat mash was distributed into sterile, 250-ml screw-capped Erlenmeyer
flasks at 50 ml/flask. For this particular set of experiments, L. paracasei was used since it is well adapted to fermentation
conditions and tolerant of higher concentrations of ethanol.
Appropriate quantities of the bacterial suspension were added to the
mashes so that the bacterial numbers were approximately 107
CFU/ml. Six different concentrations of UHP (Sigma Chemical Co.) were
tested in triplicate (Table 1). A 40%
(wt/vol) solution of UHP was made in deionized water, filter sterilized
through a 0.22-µm-pore-size membrane filter, and dispensed. The
inoculated flasks were then placed at 30°C in an incubator shaker at
150 rpm. After 48 h, samples were withdrawn from the flasks and
centrifuged at 10,200 × g for 30 min, and the
supernatants were analyzed for lactic acid. It was previously
established that there is a linear relationship between final lactic
acid concentration and initial viable bacterial cell numbers
(19).
Evaluation of the effects of UHP on lactobacilli.
Unclarified wheat mash was distributed in 500-ml quantities into 10 jacketed, sterile glass fermentors. Immediately after the 0-h sample
was withdrawn, the mashes were inoculated with L. plantarum,
L. paracasei, L. rhamnosus, L. fermentum, and Lactobacillus sp. strain 3 at
approximately 107 CFU/ml, followed by the addition of a
solution of 40% (wt/vol) UHP (a volume to give a final concentration
of 32 mM). All tests were done in duplicate. Samples were withdrawn at
0, 2, and 4 h and analyzed in triplicate for viable bacterial
numbers (CFU/milliliter) by the membrane filtration technique.
Use of UHP in batch fermentation of unclarified wheat mash.
Jacketed glass fermentors containing 500-ml quantities of wheat mash
were connected to a circulating water bath maintained at 30°C
throughout the fermentation and stirred magnetically (IKA-Labortechnik, Staufen, Germany). The experimental setup is shown in Table 1. Mashes
were infected with L. paracasei at ~107
CFU/ml. Samples were immediately withdrawn from infected fermentors for
the determination of initial viable numbers of bacteria. After 90 min,
0.4 ml of glucoamylase (Allcoholase II; Alltech, Inc.) was added to all
of the fermentors for saccharification. Exactly 30 min after the
addition of glucoamylase, yeast was inoculated into all fermentors at
approximately 106 CFU/ml (so that there was a preincubation
period of 2 h for the UHP and hydrogen peroxide before any yeast
inoculation). Then, samples were withdrawn at 0 h (immediately
after yeast inoculation) and at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h (after
yeast inoculation) for analysis.
Bactericidal effectiveness of UHP in the presence of mash
particles.
Liquefied wheat mash (
-amylase treated) was filtered
through Whatman no. 1 filter paper, and the insoluble mash solids were collected, washed three times with sterile distilled water, and refiltered. Collected solids were spread on stainless steel trays and
frozen at
40°C. Trays were placed in a tray dryer (Labconco Corp.,
Kansas City, Mo.) and lyophilized for 48 h. Once the particles were dry, the lumps were broken and powdered with a mortar and pestle
and stored at room temperature.
The experiment was done in 250-ml screw-capped, side-arm flasks with 50 ml of MRS broth in each flask. The treatments included
the use of UHP
at two different doses (2 and 42.6 mM) in the presence
or absence of
wheat mash particles (10% [wt/vol]). Doses were
chosen based on the
observations made by Anders et al. (
2)
that (i) >1.5
mmol/liter of H
2O
2 would induce the cell death
of
lactic acid bacteria and (ii) 42.6 mmol/liter was the maximum
concentration of UHP tested to manage lactic acid bacteria in
grain
mashes (although 30 mmol/liter is quite effective). All
treatments
contained
L. paracasei inoculated at ~10
7
CFU/ml, and all were done in duplicate. In treatments in which
clear
media were used, the growth of the organism was measured
by determining
the optical density using a Klett-Summerson colorimeter.
In the
presence of particles, samples were withdrawn at 0, 2,
4, 6, 12, and
24 h, and viable CFU counts (per milliliter) were
assessed (in
triplicate) using the membrane filtration
technique.
Decomposition of hydrogen peroxide and UHP in wheat mash.
Normal-gravity wheat mash was prepared and distributed into two,
jacketed glass fermentors in 400-ml quantities. The fermentors were
connected through a circulating water bath maintained at 30°C and
magnetically stirred. Hydrogen peroxide at 40 mM was added to one
fermentor, while UHP at 40 mM was added to the other. This experiment
was repeated three times. Samples were withdrawn at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 5 h after addition of the agents and analyzed for the presence
of hydrogen peroxide by fluorometry. The method involved (i) the
hydrolysis of the stable reagent L-dichlorofluorescein diacetate by sodium hydroxide to the less-stable nonfluorescent compound L-dichlorofluorescein and (ii) the subsequent
oxidation of L-dichlorofluorescein and measurement of the
formed fluorescent compound dichlorofluorescein by the horseradish
peroxidase-catalyzed reaction with hydrogen peroxide (18).
Fluorescence was measured by using the primary filter 405 and the
secondary filter 2A-12 (corresponding to a 468-nm excitation wavelength
and a 519-nm emission wavelength) using a fluorometer (Model 111; GK
Turner Associates, Palo Alto, Calif.). Concentrations of hydrogen
peroxide were calculated from the standard curve prepared by using
different known concentrations of hydrogen peroxide.
HPLC analysis.
Ethanol and lactic acid were determined by
high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) analysis. A 5-µl
aliquot from a suitably diluted fermentation sample was analyzed using
an HPX-87H column maintained at 40°C (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Ltd.,
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) which analyzes sugars, alcohols, and
organic acids. Sulfuric acid (5 mM) was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.7 ml/min. The components were detected with a
differential refractometer (Model 410; Waters Chromatographic Division,
Milford, Mass.). Boric acid (2% [wt/vol]) was used as the internal
standard. The data were processed using the Maxima 810 computer program (Waters Chromatographic Division).
Preparation of cell extracts.
Cells of lactobacilli were
grown, harvested, washed, and resuspended at (~1.5 × 1010 cells/ml) in 40 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH
7.2). The cell suspensions were passed three times through a French
pressure cell (American Instrument Co., Inc., Silver Spring, Md.) at
20,000 lb/in2. Cell debris was removed from each extract by
centrifugation at 10,300 × g for 30 min. The
supernatants (cell extracts) were used as the enzyme source. The entire
procedure was carried out at 4°C. The enzyme assays were done
immediately, and for the estimation of total protein cell extracts were
stored at 4°C for no longer than 24 h.
Specific activity of NADH peroxidase.
Oxidation of NADH
(Sigma Chemical Co.) by hydrogen peroxide at 30°C was monitored
spectrophotometrically at 340 nm. The NADH oxidizing activity (in the
absence of H2O2) was subtracted. The reaction
mixture (1 ml) contained 40 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2), 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.17 mM NADH, 0.02 mM FAD, cell extract (0.05 ml), and 1.3 mM
H2O2. The reaction was initiated by adding H2O2. All solutions used in the assay were
flushed with oxygen-free nitrogen gas for about 10 min. Total protein
in the cell extract was measured using the Bio-Rad Protein Assay Kit
II. The specific activities presented are the means of three separate
assays using a different cell extract for each assay.
 |
RESULTS |
Most suitable concentration of UHP for controlling
lactobacilli.
UHP, when used at a concentration of 32 mmol/liter
in unclarified wheat mash contaminated with L. paracasei,
reduced the final lactic acid produced (after 48 h at 30°C) from
1.14% (wt/vol) (in the control) to 0% (wt/vol) (Table
2). When added to mash, UHP breaks down
into urea and hydrogen peroxide. If yeast is added at the beginning or
immediately after the addition of UHP, the hydrogen peroxide would be
decomposed into water and molecular oxygen, resulting in the loss of
the bactericidal effect of hydrogen peroxide on contaminating
lactobacilli. Therefore, it is necessary to preincubate the mash with
UHP for a specified duration prior to yeast inoculation. This may be
done during saccharification of the mash or postsaccharification (in
the fermentor) prior to yeast addition. For maximal bactericidal action
on high levels of contaminating bacteria, a preincubation period for
2 h with UHP was required before mashes were inoculated with yeast
(data not shown).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
The 48-h concentration of lactic acid produced by
L. paracasei inoculated at ~107 CFU/ml into
unclarified wheat mash at 30°C in the presence of UHP at
various levels
|
|
Reduction of lactobacilli in the presence of UHP.
All five
industrially important isolates of lactobacilli exhibited 4- to 5-log
reductions in viable cell numbers in 2 h in the presence of UHP
(Table 3). The results indicate that UHP is effective in preventing the growth of yield-reducing bacterial contaminants in the fuel alcohol industry. The bactericidal
effectiveness of UHP did not differ significantly when added as a
powder or in the form of a filter-sterilized 40% (wt/vol) solution in
deionized water (data not shown).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Survival of various Lactobacillus strains in
unclarified wheat mash at 30°C in the presence of UHP at
32.1 mmol/liter
|
|
Batch fermentations of unclarified wheat mash contaminated (infected)
with
L. paracasei at ~10
7 CFU/ml were carried
out in the presence or absence of UHP. The
details of the treatments
are given in Materials and Methods.
The fermentations were complete
(<0.05 g of dissolved solids remaining/100
ml) within 36 h in all
of the treatments. Viable yeast counts
reached a maximum during the
first 24 h. Compared to the controls,
the yeast viable numbers
were higher in treatments with UHP and
with hydrogen peroxide. The
numbers of viable yeast cells were
lowest in samples treated with
bacteria but in which no agents
were added (Fig.
1). In samples with bacteria but without
agents
this is likely due to the competition for nutrients by the
bacteria
as well as the production of lactic acid, which at levels of
0.8%
(wt/vol) begin to stress the yeast (
13).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Growth of yeast during the fermentation of wheat mash at
30°C. Symbols: , control (yeast plus 30 mM urea, no bacteria);
, yeast plus L. paracasei plus 30 mM urea (no agents);
, yeast plus UHP at 30 mM; , yeast plus L. paracasei
plus UHP at 30 mM; , yeast plus 30 mM H2O2
plus 30 mM urea (added separately); , yeast plus L. paracasei plus 30 mM H2O2 plus 30 mM urea
(added separately). In all cases, yeast was inoculated at
~106 CFU/ml. Where added, L. paracasei was
inoculated at ~107 CFU/ml.
|
|
The number of viable bacteria in mash dropped from ~10
7
to ~2 × 10
2 CFU/ml in the first 2 h when
treated with UHP or hydrogen peroxide.
Once yeast was inoculated,
residual hydrogen peroxide in the medium
was decomposed by the action
of catalase known to be present in
microbodies of yeast cells
(
24). We have verified the presence
of catalase in this
yeast strain by using the traditional catalase
test. Once hydrogen
peroxide is degraded, the remaining viable
bacteria are able to
reinitiate growth (Fig.
2). Even though
the
fermentation was effectively over at 36 h, however, the
bacteria
continue to grow (Fig.
2), presumably on substrates not used
by
yeast and on lytic products from yeast. At 36 h, the bacterial
numbers were too low to have caused significant reductions of
ethanol
yield; control of the fermentation at the critical time
was effected by
this practice.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Growth of L. paracasei in fermenting wheat
mash at 30°C in the presence or absence of hydrogen peroxide or UHP.
All treatments had yeast inoculated at ~106 CFU/ml (at
0 h) following a 2-h preincubation with the antimicrobials. UHP
(30 mM) yields 30 mmol/liter of H2O2 and 30 mmol/liter of urea.
|
|
The lactic acid concentration in the medium when UHP was used was as
low as that in the treatment with yeast alone with no
bacteria
(~0.03% [wt/vol]) (Fig.
3). In the
treatment in which
hydrogen peroxide alone was used, 0.05% (wt/vol)
lactic acid was
detected. In the medium in which neither of the
bactericidal agents
was used, however, 0.9% (wt/vol) lactic acid was
found at the
time when the ethanol production was maximal in all
treatments.
This level (0.9% [wt/vol]) severely affected yeast
viability (Fig.
1). The maximum concentrations of ethanol produced in
all of the
treated fermentors were not significantly different from
each
other, but in the fermentor that had neither UHP nor hydrogen
peroxide to kill the
L. paracasei there was a 5.84%
reduction
in ethanol yield compared to the control with yeast alone and
no agents added (Fig.
4).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Concentration of lactic acid produced (after 36 h)
by L. paracasei in the presence or absence of UHP or
hydrogen peroxide in fermenting wheat mash at 30°C. Columns: A,
control (yeast plus 30 mM urea, no bacteria); B, yeast plus L. paracasei plus 30 mM urea (no agents); C, yeast plus UHP at 30 mM;
D, yeast plus L. paracasei plus UHP at 30 mM; E, yeast plus
30 mM H2O2 plus 30 mM urea (added separately);
F, yeast plus L. paracasei plus 30 mM
H2O2 plus 30 mM urea (added separately). In all
cases, yeast was inoculated at ~106 CFU/ml. Where added,
L. paracasei was inoculated at ~107 CFU/ml.
Error bars indicate the mean of duplicate values ± the standard
deviation.
|
|

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Concentration of ethanol after 36 h of fermentation
of wheat mash by S. cerevisiae at 30°C. Columns are as
defined in Fig. 3. Error bars indicate mean of duplicate values ± the standard deviation.
|
|
Decomposition and bactericidal effectiveness of UHP in the presence
of particulate matter.
Hydrogen peroxide (released from the
breakdown of UHP in the medium) is presumed to be quickly decomposed in
the presence of particulate materials. Results indicated that a dose of
2 mmol of UHP per liter is enough to kill L. paracasei in a
clear medium (MRS broth), whereas a much higher dose is needed in the
presence of grain particles (Table 4). A
similar kind of experiment was conducted with clarified wheat mash (in
which the mash particles were filtered out using Whatman no. 4 filter
paper, followed by a filtration using diatomaceous earth). The
clarified mash was then passed through a 0.45-µm (pore-size)
Versaflow filter (Gelman Sciences, Ltd.) and used. It was then found
that UHP at a dose as low as 2 mmol/liter killed L. paracasei when inoculated at ~107 CFU/ml. There was
absolutely no bacterial growth observed for up to 48 h after the
addition of UHP (data not shown). It was previously found that UHP in
wheat mash at a concentration of 40 mM was totally decomposed in 5 h. No significant differences were observed in the decomposition of
hydrogen peroxide, whether added as H2O2 or as
UHP (Fig. 5).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Decomposition of hydrogen peroxide when applied as
H2O2 ( ) or in the form of UHP ( ) in
normal-gravity wheat mash at 30°C. The error bars indicate ± the standard deviation obtained from triplicate analyses.
|
|
NADH peroxidase activity.
The NADH peroxidase activities of
all five selected industrially important lactobacilli were assayed.
Assays were performed on cultures grown in MRS broth at 30°C in
screw-capped Erlenmeyer flasks flushed with sterile CO2
gas, on cultures grown in MRS broth with H2O2
at a sublethal level (0.75 mM), and on cultures transferred to fresh
MRS broth without H2O2 from those grown in the
presence of 0.75 mM H2O2. The final set of
experiments was done to see if the activity was reduced in the absence
of hydrogen peroxide. The data were subjected to Duncan's multiple
range test (SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.). A significant increase
(P = 0.05) in NADH peroxidase activity was observed
with all five Lactobacillus strains studied, when grown in
the presence of a sublethal concentration (0.75 mM) of
H2O2 (Table 5).
Upon transferring them back to fresh MRS broth without
H2O2 (for ~18 h), there was a significant
loss (P = 0.05) in the specific activity. These data
suggest that if a high-enough concentration of
H2O2 was administered, the organisms would be
unable to adapt quickly enough to enzymatically degrade the
antimicrobial at a meaningful rate and would therefore be killed.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 5.
NADH peroxidase activity in various
Lactobacillus strains grown in MRS broth at 30°C in the
presence or absence of hydrogen peroxide (0.75 mmol/liter)
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The occurrence of contaminants in an industrial-scale ethanol
fermentation process using starch- or sugar-based feedstocks is
unavoidable. UHP (which eliminates the risk of the emergence of
antibiotic-resistant microorganisms) appears to be an ecologically friendly agent for effectively managing lactic acid bacteria and other
bacterial contaminants in the production of industrial or fuel ethanol.
Batch fermentations of mashes were complete by 36 h in all cases
in which the effect of UHP on L. paracasei was studied. This was due to the increased availability of assimilable nitrogen under all
conditions. Since grain mashes are, in general, deficient in usable
nitrogen, both yeast growth and fermentation rate benefit from urea
whether it is added as free urea or as UHP. It was reported by Thomas
and Ingledew (23) that the fermentation of wheat mash without supplementation with an assimilable nitrogen source is slow
(ca. 120 h), but with added urea the fermentation completed in
less than 72 h. The fermentation rate in the present study, in
which urea from UHP served as the assimilable nitrogen source, was
similar to that reported by these workers. Jones and Ingledew (15) have shown complete utilization of urea by yeast during the early stages of fermentation. In experiments done to compare diammonium phosphate with urea (in equimolar quantities, so that both
would provide yeast with equal amounts of nitrogen), along with
hydrogen peroxide, urea appeared to be a better source of nitrogen in
combination with hydrogen peroxide at 30 mmol/liter (unpublished
results). Interestingly, the availability of UHP (in a solid, stable
form) makes this compound a good choice for use in the production of
industrial or fuel ethanol.
Hydrogen peroxide is a natural product of the action of some
flavoprotein oxidases of lactic acid bacteria with oxygen, and it may
accumulate in the "aerobic" cultures of many strains. In lactococci
sensitive to hydrogen peroxide, preexposure to a sublethal concentration of the compound allowed the organism to grow in the
presence of a lethal concentration of hydrogen peroxide (8). Codon (8) also observed a simultaneous induction of NADH
peroxidase and, to a lesser extent, of NADH oxidase. Since lactic acid
bacteria lack catalase (due to their inability to synthesize
hemoporphyrins), they use NADH peroxidase to rid themselves of hydrogen
peroxide when it is present at sublethal levels (2, 21).
NADH peroxidase catalyzes the following reaction: NADH + H+ + H2O2
2H2O + NAD. As the
activity of NADH peroxidase is rapidly lost when the organism grows in
the absence of H2O2 (Table 5), the chances of
resistant mutants (organisms that would constitutively express high
levels of NADH peroxidase) is reduced.
UHP not only exhibits excellent bactericidal activity against
lactobacilli but also has the important advantage of providing the
fermentation yeast with usable nitrogen in the form of urea which, with
oxygen, are essential nutrients for stimulating yeast growth and
fermentation rate (12). This serves to prevent
"sluggish" or "stuck" fermentations that would lead to a
reduction in alcohol yields. UHP leaves no residues when added to the
fermentation medium. The pH of the mash is not affected as it would be
if ammonium salts were employed, nor are there residues in the whole or
thin stillage. Moreover, hydrogen peroxide (at the dose recommended) can also eliminate a wide variety of contaminating bacteria that are
present in low levels in the mash. We found that UHP (2 mM) was enough
to kill Pediococcus damnosus (ATCC 29358),
Pediococcus sp. (BSO 77), and Zymomonas anaerobia
in MRS broth when inoculated at ~107 CFU/ml. Block
(6) has shown hydrogen peroxide to be lethal to other
bacterial species, such as Staphylococcus aureus,
Escherichia coli, Streptococcus spp., and
spore-forming Bacillus spp.
UHP proves to be an ideal additive for use in the production of
industrial or fuel ethanol. We advocate the use of 2 mmol of urea
hydrogen peroxide or hydrogen peroxide per liter as a disinfectant only
in clear mashes. Yeast nutrients would still be required. For mashes
with particulates, ~32 mmol of UHP (or hydrogen peroxide) per liter
is required. At this concentration, UHP provides all of the usable
nitrogen and oxygen needed to ensure predictable, trouble-free
fermentations; hydrogen peroxide at 32 mmol/liter would only serve as a disinfectant.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank J. Finguerut, Centro de Technologia Copersucar,
Piracicaba, SP, Brazil, and Cargill Corn Milling, Eddyville, Iowa (D. Schisler) for the strains provided and D. A. Bautista for aid with
the statistical analyses.
N.V.N. thanks the University of Saskatchewan for providing scholarship
support. The Western Grains Research Foundation, the College of
Agriculture, and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
are acknowledged for grant support (to W.M.I.).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Applied Microbiology and Food Science, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Dr., Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada. Phone: (306) 966-5028. Fax:
(306) 966-8898. E-mail: ingledew{at}sask.usask.ca.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Amin, V. M., and N. F. Olson.
1967.
Effect of temperature on stability of hydrogen peroxide in milk.
J. Dairy Sci.
50:1336-1338[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Anders, R. F.,
D. M. Hogg, and G. R. Jago.
1970.
Formation of hydrogen peroxide by group N streptococci and its effects on their growth and metabolism.
Appl. Microbiol.
19:608-612[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Andreasen, A. A., and T. Stier.
1954.
Anaerobic nutrition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Cell. Comp. Physiol.
43:271-281[CrossRef].
|
| 4.
|
Aquarone, E.
1960.
Penicillin and tetracycline as contamination control agents in alcoholic fermentation of sugarcane molasses.
Appl. Microbiol.
8:263-268[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Banerjee, N. L.
1947.
Use of hydrogen peroxide as a milk preservative.
Ind. Med. Gazette
1947:156-159.
|
| 6.
|
Block, S. S.
1991.
Peroxygen compounds, p. 167-181.
In
S. S. Block (ed.), Disinfection, sterilization, and preservation, 4th ed. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 7.
|
Chang, I. S.,
B. H. Kim, and P. K. Shin.
1997.
Use of sulfite and hydrogen peroxide to control bacterial contamination in ethanol fermentation.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63:1-6[Abstract].
|
| 8.
|
Condon, S.
1987.
Responses of lactic acid bacteria to oxygen.
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
46:269-280[CrossRef].
|
| 9.
|
Day, W. H.,
W. C. Serjak,
J. R. Stratton, and L. Stone.
1954.
Antibiotics as contamination control agents in grain alcohol fermentations.
J. Agric. Food Chem.
2:252-258.
|
| 10.
|
Hynes, S. H.,
D. M. Kjarsgaard,
K. C. Thomas, and W. M. Ingledew.
1997.
Use of virginiamycin to control the growth of lactic acid bacteria during alcoholic fermentation.
J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
18:284-291[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Ingledew, W. M.
1993.
Yeast for the production of fuel ethanol, p. 245-291.
In
A. H. Rose, and J. S. Harrison (ed.), The yeasts, vol. 5. Yeast technology. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 12.
|
Ingledew, W. M.
1995.
The Biochemistry of alcohol production, p. 55-79.
In
T. P. Lyons, D. R. Kelsall, and J. E. Murtagh (ed.), The alcohol textbook, 2nd ed. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
|
| 13.
|
Ingledew, W. M.
1999.
Alcohol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a yeast primer, p. 49-87.
In
K. Jacques, T. P. Lyons, and D. R. Kelsall (ed.), The alcohol textbook, 3rd ed. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
|
| 14.
|
Ingledew, W. M.,
J. D. Burton,
D. W. Hysert, and G. Van Gheluwe.
1980.
Membrane filtration: survival of brewing microbes on membranes during storage at reduced humidities.
J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem.
38:125-129.
|
| 15.
|
Jones, A. M., and W. M. Ingledew.
1994.
Fuel alcohol production: appraisal of nitrogenous yeast foods for very high gravity wheat mash fermentation.
Proc. Biochem.
29:483-488[CrossRef].
|
| 16.
|
Keston, A. S., and R. Brandt.
1965.
The fluorometric analysis of ultramicro quantities of hydrogen peroxide.
Anal. Biochem.
11:1-5[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Khachatourians, G. G.
1998.
Agricultural use of antibiotics and the evolution and transfer of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Can. Med. Assoc. J.
159:1129-1136[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Luck, H.
1956.
The use of hydrogen peroxide as a dairy preservative.
Dairy Sci. Abstr.
18:363-386.
|
| 19.
|
Narendranath, N. V.,
S. H. Hynes,
K. C. Thomas, and W. M. Ingledew.
1997.
Effects of lactobacilli on yeast-catalyzed ethanol fermentations.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63:4158-4163[Abstract].
|
| 20.
|
Patterson, C. A., and W. M. Ingledew.
1999.
Utilization of peptides by a lager brewing yeast.
J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem.
57:1-8.
|
| 21.
|
Piard, J. C., and M. Desmazeaud.
1991.
Inhibiting factors produced by lactic acid bacteria. 1. Oxygen metabolites and catabolism end products.
Lait
71:525-541.
|
| 22.
|
Thomas, K. C.,
S. H. Hynes,
A. M. Jones, and W. M. Ingledew.
1993.
Production of fuel ethanol from wheat by VHG technology: effect of sugar concentration and fermentation temperature.
Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
43:211-226.
|
| 23.
|
Thomas, K. C., and W. M. Ingledew.
1992.
Relationship of low lysine and high arginine concentrations to efficient ethanolic fermentation of wheat mash.
Can. J. Microbiol.
38:626-634[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Walker, G. M.
1998.
Yeast physiology and biotechnology.
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, England.
|
| 25.
|
Zinner, D. D.,
L. F. Duany, and M. Liorente.
1978.
Effects of urea peroxide in anhydrous glycerol on gingivitis and dental plaque.
J. Preventive Dent.
5:38-40.
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2000, p. 4187-4192, Vol. 66, No. 10
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Jacob, M. E., Fox, J. T., Narayanan, S. K., Drouillard, J. S., Renter, D. G., Nagaraja, T. G.
(2008). Effects of feeding wet corn distillers grains with solubles with or without monensin and tylosin on the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of fecal foodborne pathogenic and commensal bacteria in feedlot cattle. J ANIM SCI
86: 1182-1190
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Narendranath, N. V., Power, R.
(2005). Relationship between pH and Medium Dissolved Solids in Terms of Growth and Metabolism of Lactobacilli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae during Ethanol Production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 2239-2243
[Abstract]
[Full Text]