Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 2000, p. 4772-4778, Vol. 66, No. 11
Unité de Recherche de Biochimie et
Structure des Protéines, Institut National de la Recherche
Agronomique, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas Cedex, France
Received 12 May 2000/Accepted 4 August 2000
Streptococcus thermophilus CNRZ 385 expresses a cell
envelope proteinase (PrtS), which is characterized in the present work, both at the biochemical and genetic levels. Since PrtS is resistant to
most classical methods of extraction from the cell envelopes, we
developed a three-step process based on loosening of the cell wall by
cultivation of the cells in the presence of glycine (20 mM), mechanical
disruption (with alumina powder), and enzymatic treatment (lysozyme).
The pure enzyme is a serine proteinase highly activated by
Ca2+ ions. Its activity was optimal at 37°C and pH 7.5 with acetyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-paranitroanilide as substrate. The study of
the hydrolysis of the chromogenic and casein substrates indicated that
PrtS presented an intermediate specificity between the most divergent
types of cell envelope proteinases from lactococci, known as the PI and
PIII types. This result was confirmed by the sequence determination of
the regions involved in substrate specificity, which were a mix between
those of PI and PIII types, and also had unique residues. Sequence
analysis of the PrtS encoding gene revealed that PrtS is a member of
the subtilase family. It is a multidomain protein which is maturated and tightly anchored to the cell wall via a mechanism involving an
LPXTG motif. PrtS bears similarities to cell envelope proteinases from
pyogenic streptococci (C5a peptidase and cell surface proteinase) and
lactic acid bacteria (PrtP, PrtH, and PrtB). The highest homologies were found with streptococcal proteinases which lack, as PrtS, one
domain (the B domain) present in cell envelope proteinases from all
other lactic acid bacteria.
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are
widely used as starters in fermented milk products due to their
properties of milk acidification and flavor development. For these
applications, their capacity to grow fast in milk is of major
importance. LAB are fastidious microorganisms and require an exogenous
source of amino acids or peptides for optimal growth. As milk is poor
in these low-molecular-weight compounds, their growth largely depends
on their proteolytic system to achieve hydrolysis of caseins
(65). The cell envelope proteinase (CEP) is the key enzyme
of this process since it is the only enzyme capable of initiating the
breakdown of caseins into oligopeptides. The latter are then
transported into the bacteria and further degraded by a complex set of
intracellular peptidases (12).
The cell envelope proteinases of lactococci, and to a lesser extent
those of lactobacilli, have been the subject of intensive biochemical
and genetic investigation (for a review, see reference 37). Lactococcal proteinase PrtP is synthesized as
an inactive preproenzyme and maturated via an autoproteolytic process
involving a chaperone lipoprotein PrtM, and it is anchored to the cell
wall. The hydrolysis specificity of CEPs determined on caseins or
casein peptides varies among strains, and several classifications have been proposed (5, 18, 21, 22, 24, 40, 66). The differences
observed in substrate specificity are only due to the variation, in the
CEP sequences, of very few amino acids (8, 61, 68).
The CEPs from LAB and also from pyogenic streptococci are serine
proteinases which belong to the subtilisin-like serine proteinase family known as the subtilase family (60). They are
multidomain proteins with highly conserved catalytic domains. Among
species, more variation exists between these CEPs at their C terminus
(presence or absence of the B domain and of the helical domain
[59]) and in their way of anchoring to the cell envelopes. Most frequently, LAB possess only one CEP, but the presence of two CEPs has been described in lactobacilli
(48, 63).
In spite of the wide utilization of Streptococcus
thermophilus in the production of dairy products (yogurt, hard
cooked cheese, soft cheese), little is known about its CEP. Most
strains of S. thermophilus do not express or express a very
low level of CEP (14, 56, 58). A screening of S. thermophilus strains revealed that only 3 among 97 of them
possessed a level of proteinase activity close to that of the
proteinase-positive lactococcal strain (56). These strains
also grew and produced acid in milk faster than the 94 others. For two
of them, strains CNRZ 385 and 703, the CEPs were characterized in cell
wall fractions and not in pure preparations, as the release treatments
tested remained unsuccessful (57). DNA hybridization and
immunoblot studies suggested that CEP from S. thermophilus
and PrtP from lactococci were not closely related (36, 57).
The present paper describes for the first time the release and
purification of a CEP from S. thermophilus CNRZ 385. We
determined its biochemical properties and its substrate specificity as
well as the sequence of its encoding gene. We propose that this CEP from S. thermophilus be called PrtS.
Bacterial strains, culture conditions, and transformation.
The strain S. thermophilus CNRZ 385 originated from the
Centre National de Recherche Zootechnique culture collection (INRA, Jouy-en-Josas, France). This strain is plasmid free and was previously classified as an H strain, i.e., a strain with a high acidification rate in milk (56). It was grown in M17 medium at 37°C
(64) supplemented with 20 g of lactose · liter Cell wall proteinase release.
S. thermophilus CNRZ 385 was grown in 5 liter of M17 Lac broth (Difco) supplemented with 20 g of lactose · liter Cell wall proteinase purification. (i) Ultrafiltration.
The
cell extract (120 ml) was concentrated by ultrafiltration in 50 mM
Bis-Tris buffer, pH 6.5, containing 2 mM CaCl2 through a
100-kDa cut-off cellulose ester membrane (Spectra Por; Spectrum Medical
Industries, Los Angeles, Calif.). Thirty milliliters was recovered and
checked for proteinase activity with 14C casein as the
substrate (see below).
(ii) Ion-exchange chromatography.
The dialyzed extract was
loaded on a UnoQ column (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.)
equilibrated with 50 mM Bis-Tris buffer, pH 6.5. Bound proteins were
eluted at a flow rate of 2 ml · min (iii) Gel filtration chromatography.
The last purification
step was performed on a Superose 6 column (Pharmacia-Amersham, Uppsala,
Sweden) with 50 mM Bis-Tris buffer, pH 6.5, containing 0.15 M NaCl. The
concentrated sample was applied to the column and eluted at a flow rate
of 0.2 ml · min Protein quantification and proteinase activity measurement.
Protein concentrations were determined in the cellular extract and
purified fractions by the method of Bradford (6) using the
Pierce (Rockford, Ill.) protein assay reagent with bovine serum albumin
as the standard.
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Streptococcus thermophilus Cell
Wall-Anchored Proteinase: Release, Purification, and Biochemical and
Genetic Characterization

![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
1. Escherichia coli TG1 (29)
was transformed according to the method of Hanahan et al.
(32) except that E. coli cells were grown
overnight in Luria-Bertani medium (53) containing 10 mM MgCl2 instead of SOB medium (53) and that KCl
was used to replace RbCl in the washing buffers.
1 and 20 mM glycine. Cells
were collected at the end of the exponential growth phase by
centrifugation at 8,500 × g at 4°C for 20 min. They
were washed twice with 50 mM
-glycerophosphate buffer, pH 7, and
then resuspended in 125 ml of 50 mM Bis-Tris buffer, pH 6.5. Alumina
powder (2.5-fold the pellet weight) was added, and the mixture was
manually crushed for 5 min with a pestle. The alumina powder was
removed by centrifugation at 500 × g for 5 min, and
the supernatant obtained was centrifuged at 20,000 × g
for 15 min at 4°C. The pellet was resuspended in 125 ml of 50 mM
Bis-Tris buffer, pH 6.5, supplemented with 2 mM CaCl2 and 1 mg of lysozyme · ml
1 and then incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Cell debris were removed by centrifugation at 4°C for 15 min at 8,500 × g, and the supernatant, referred to as
cell wall extract, was used for proteinase purification.
1 with a
four-step linear gradient of NaCl: firstly, 0 to 0.15 M for 5 min;
secondly, 0.15 M for 5 min; thirdly, 0.15 to 0.4 M for 40 min; and
finally, 0.4 to 1 M for 5 min. Fractions (2 ml) were collected and
checked for their [14C]casein hydrolysis activity; those
which were active were pooled and concentrated using a 50-kDa
Centriplus concentrator (Amicon, Damers, Mass.) for further purification.
1, and 0.6-ml fractions were
collected. The column was calibrated with thyroglobulin (670 kDa),
gamma globulin (158 kDa), ovalbumin (44 kDa), myoglobin (17 kDa), and
vitamin B12 (1.35 kDa).
-caseins
used as described above, the incubation conditions were 15 min at
30°C in the presence of 5 mM CaCl2. With the
S1-casein-(1-23) fragment, synthesized with a Peptide Synthesizer Synergy device (model 432A; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.), the reaction conditions were 10 µl of pure proteinase solution (100 ng), 40 µM substrate, and 10 mM CaCl2 in
buffers with different pH (4, 5.2, 6.2, and 8) and at different
temperatures (18, 30, and 37°C) for different incubation times (from
2 to 8 h). The reactions were stopped by the addition of 1%
(final concentration) trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). The hydrolysates were
then analyzed by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography
using a C18 column (Nucleosyl C18; Shandon) in
a TFA-acetonitrile (CH3CN) solvent system (solvent A:
0.115% TFA; solvent B: 0.1% TFA-60% CH3CN) and recorded
at 214 nm. The column was equilibrated with buffer A at a flow rate of
1 ml · min
1. Elution was carried out using a
linear gradient of 0 to 100% solvent B for 30 min. Peaks were
collected, dried, and identified by mass spectrometry using a LD-TOF
system (model G2025A; Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, Calif.).
Biochemical characterization of proteinase. (i) Electrophoresis, blotting, and N-terminal protein sequencing. The purified fraction was analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using 8 to 25% gradient acrylamide gels (Pharmacia) according to the method of Laemmli (38). The proteins were silver stained according to the method of Blum et al. (3). The purified enzyme (10 µg) was fixed on a polyvinylidene difluoride ProSorb cartridge (Applied Biosystems) and directly applied onto a sequencer (model 477A; Applied Biosystems).
(ii) Effect of pH and temperature on proteinase activity. The effect of pH was determined on Ac-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNa (0.75 mM) as described above at 37°C for 10 min in microplates in the presence of 5 mM CaCl2. pH was tested in the range of 4.5 to 8.5 with the following 0.1 M buffers: sodium acetate, pH 4.5 to 5.5; Bis-Tris, pH 5.5 to 7; and Tris, pH 7 to 8.5.
The temperature effect was determined at temperatures ranging from 15 to 45°C. The enzyme was incubated for 10 min in 0.1 M Tris buffer, pH 8, containing 5 mM CaCl2 at the required temperature with Ac-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNa (0.75 mM) as the substrate, and the activity was measured as described above.(iii) Effect of inhibitors and ions on proteinase activity. The purified enzyme was preincubated for 10 min at room temperature in microplates containing 0.1 M Tris (pH 8) with various inhibitors or ions; Ac-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNa (0.75 mM) was then added to the reaction mixture, the mixture was incubated for 10 min at 20°C; and proteinase activity was measured as described above. CaCl2 (5 mM) was added to all reactions. Inhibitors tested were phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (1 mM), chymostatin (0.1 mM), dithiothreitol (1 mM), L-trans-epoxysuccinyl leucylamide-(4-guanidino)butane (E64) (10 µM), iodoacetic acid (1 mM), EDTA (1 mM), antipain (0.1 mM), and bestatin (0.01 mM); ions tested were CaCl2 (2, 5, and 10 mM) and NaCl (0.6 and 1.2 M).
Genetic characterization of proteinase. (i) Total DNA preparation. Total DNA of S. thermophilus CNRZ 385 was prepared as described by Pospiech and Neumann (50).
(ii) PCRs. The S. thermophilus CNRZ 385 proteinase gene was amplified in a two-step PCR process using a Perkin-Elmer DNA thermal cycler (model 480). Oligonucleotides were from Eurogentec (Seraing, Belgium) or Genaxis (Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France).
Firstly, the N-terminal part of the gene was amplified using convergent degenerated oligonucleotides 1 (5'AAYATHGAYAGYAAYAC3') and 2 (5'YTTRTANCCRCTRTACCA3'), both deduced from the N-terminal sequence of the proteinase. Streptococcal DNA (50 ng) was added to a PCR mixture (2.5 U of Appligene Taq polymerase, 6 µM oligonucleotide 1) and, after 5 min of denaturation at 95°C, oligonucleotide 2 (6 µM) was added. Then, 30 cycles of 30 s of denaturation at 95°C, 30 s of annealing at 37°C, and 30 s of elongation at 72°C were performed. The amplified fragment was purified from 4% Nusieve agarose gel with the Spin-X system (Corning Costar Co., Cambridge, Mass.); it was then cloned in pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega Corp., Madison, Wis.) by transformation of thermocompetent TG1 E. coli cells. This fragment was then sequenced from the recombinant vector as described below. A 57-bp sequence was determined. Secondly, the whole gene was sequenced by successive inverse PCRs, using two divergent oligonucleotides in the first reaction (5'AAAGTTTGGTACAGYGGYTACA3' and 5'AATGATCGTRTTACTRTCGATG3') deduced from the 57-bp sequence obtained in the first step and using the LA PCR in vitro cloning kit (Takara Biomedicals, Shiga, Japan). The latter is a cloning system to specifically amplify long unknown regions of DNA when the DNA sequence of only one end of the region of interest is known. Amplification was accomplished by PCR with restriction enzyme-specific cassettes (double-stranded synthetic oligonucleotides which are ligated to the region of interest) and cassette-specific primers in combination with primers designed from the sequence of interest (34).(iii) DNA sequencing. Amplified DNA fragments were extracted from 0.7% agarose gels with the Qiaquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen Inc., Chatsworth, Calif.) and sequenced. The Sanger method of DNA sequencing was carried out on double-strand DNA plasmids and on PCR products with the BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit (370A DNA sequencer; Applied Biosystems). The reported sequences were determined at least twice for both strands. The DNA and protein sequences were analyzed with the Genetics Computer Group sequence analysis software package from the University of Wisconsin (16) and Mail Fasta (National Center for Biotechnology Information).
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The GenBank nucleotide accession number for prtS and its flanking regions is AF243528.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PrtS is a serine proteinase highly activated by CaCl2. The methods used for releasing CEPs from other LAB were not efficient for the S. thermophilus PrtS proteinase; in particular, the easiest method, which consists of incubating the cells in a Ca2+-free buffer, was inefficient (data not shown) (57). Several other classical methods usually used for protein extraction from the cell envelopes, such as cell wall or cell membrane destabilization treatments, or cell breaking processes also remained unsuccessful, as a maximum of 12.5% of initial proteinase activity was recovered (data not shown). We were thus led to develop a specific method to release PrtS from the cell envelopes. It combined the three following treatments: firstly, the loosening of the cell wall during cellular growth by the addition of glycine (20 mM) to the culture medium; secondly, breaking of the cells with alumina powder; and finally, digestion of the cell wall by lysozyme.
PrtS was then purified to homogeneity through a three-step process including ultrafiltration and ion-exchange and gel filtration chromatographies; 60 µg of pure enzyme was recovered from a 5-liter culture, with a purification factor of about 110-fold and an activity recovery of 36%. The molecular mass of PrtS was estimated to be 153 kDa by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The 19 N-terminal amino acids (aa) of PrtS were as follows: H2N-Asn-Ile-Asp-Ser-Asn-Thr-Ile-Ile-Thr-Val-Pro-Lys-Val-Trp-Tyr-Ser-Gly-Tyr-Lys. PrtS was active over a pH range of 5.5 to 8.5 with Ac-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNa as the substrate, with maximum activity at pH 7.5 and about 70% of the activity remaining at pH 7 and 8. The optimum temperature was 37°C with the same substrate. PrtS is a serine proteinase, as it was strongly inhibited by serine proteinase inhibitors such as phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (100% inhibition) and, to a lesser extent, chymostatin (75% inhibition). Inhibition was also observed with iodoacetic acid (a cystein proteinase inhibitor) (83% inhibition), whereas little or no inhibition of PrtS activity occurred with EDTA (a metal chelating reagent) (30% inhibition), bestatin (an aminopeptidase inhibitor) (no inhibition), or E64 (a strictly cystein proteinase inhibitor) (no inhibition). We tested PrtS activity with Ac-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNa as the substrate in the presence of two concentrations of NaCl, 0.6 M (3.5%) or 1.2 M (7%); PrtS was still active and even slightly activated, as 111 and 120% of initial activity were recovered, respectively. CaCl2 highly activated PrtS; initial activity increased by 2- to 10-fold after addition of 2 to 10 mM CaCl2, respectively. Furthermore, after conservation for several weeks at
20°C, PrtS activity was observable only in presence of
CaCl2.
PrtS has a substrate specificity close to that of CEPs from other LAB. Regarding its activity towards both chromogenic and casein substrates, PrtS presents a mixed substrate specificity of lactococcal PI and PIII types.
Of the seven chromogenic substrates tested (Table 1), PrtS was capable of hydrolyzing the four substrates sharing an aromatic amino acid at position P1 and a proline at position P2 (according to the nomenclature of Schechter and Berger [54]), but its activity was severely reduced when a negatively charged amino acid was located at position P3. The other three substrates, which possess a positively charged amino acid at position P1 instead of an aromatic one, were not hydrolyzed. One of the two best hydrolyzed substrates was MS-Arg-Pro-Tyr-pNA (MS-Arg), which is the preferential substrate of PI type lactococcal proteinase (9), whereas S-Ala-Glu-Pro-Phe-pNA (S-Glu), which is more specific of PIII-type lactococcal proteinase (9), was poorly degraded by PrtS.
|
-casein at about the same rate (
casein/whole casein hydrolysis ratio of 0.8), which indicates that
PrtS, as a PIII-type lactococcal proteinase, does not present a marked
preference for
-casein.
Depending on the reaction conditions (e.g., pH, salinity), PrtS
hydrolyzed
s1-casein-(1-23) fragment at different sites
(Fig. 1), all corresponding to hydrolysis
sites already identified for PI- and PIII-type lactococcal proteinases.
Under all conditions tested, hydrolysis occurred preferentially and
primarily at bonds 16-17 and 17-18 (as indicated in Fig. 1). Near the
optimum pH and temperature, i.e., at pH 8 and 37°C, PrtS cleaved the
same bonds as PI-type lactococcal proteinase. At a pH corresponding to
that prevailing in cheese (pH 5.2), the proteinase hydrolyzed only
three bonds, corresponding to those recognized by the PIII-type lactococcal proteinase (21). At a more acidic pH (pH 4, as
observed in yogurts) or in the presence of a high concentration of NaCl (4%, as observed in cheeses), the activity was no longer visible under
our measurement conditions. The hydrolysis of 8-9 and 9-10 bonds of the
s1-casein-(1-23) fragment along with the absence of
hydrolysis of these two bonds at acidic pH (5.2), which are typical of
PI type proteinase, indicate that, qualitatively, PrtS specificity on
this substrate is closer to that of PI- than to that of PIII-type
lactococcal proteinase (19).
|
PrtS is a multidomain protein, maturated and anchored to the cell
wall. (i) Sequencing and analysis of prtS gene.
The
prtS gene was sequenced first by performing PCR with two
degenerated oligonucleotides deduced from the N-terminal amino acid
sequence of the protein PrtS. A DNA fragment of 57 bp was amplified;
its deduced amino acid sequence fitted perfectly with the N-terminal
sequence of PrtS, indicating that the expected gene had been
identified. Then, by successive inverse and LA PCRs, a sequence of
6,142 bp containing the entire prtS gene was determined. Sequence analysis of the 6,142-bp fragment revealed one complete open
reading frame (ORF1) and three incomplete and overlapping ORFs: ORF2,
ORF3, and ORF4 (Fig. 2). ORF1, which
corresponded to the prtS gene, was 4,755 bp long and encoded
a putative protein of 1,585 amino acids, with a calculated molecular
mass of 169 kDa. A potential ribosome binding site complementary to the
3' end of S. thermophilus 16S rRNA (Genbank sequence
accession number X68418) was found 5 bp upstream of the putative ATG
start codon (bases 333 to 335) of ORF1. Consensus sequences
corresponding to potential promoters were not clearly identified in the
overall sequence. About 80 bp downstream of ORF1, an inverted repeat
resembling a putative terminator of transcription was present. No ORFs
were found in the 330 bp upstream of prtS gene, unlike what
was observed for lactococci, where an ORF encoding a maturation
lipoprotein (PrtM) was present upstream of prtP
(36). No consensus sequence corresponding to the specific
binding site of the transcriptional activator Mga of protein M and C5a
peptidase from group A streptococci (42), involved in
virulence, was found in the 330-bp sequence upstream of
prtS.
|
(ii) Homology search. Comparison of the amino acid sequence of PrtS with the proteins from the databases revealed high homology with CEPs from pyogenic streptococci (C5a peptidase from Streptococcus agalactiae [11] and Streptococcus pyogenes [10], and Csp from S. agalactiae [59]) and LAB (PrtP from lactococci [36, 67] and Lactobacillus casei [33], PrtB from Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus [30], and PrtH from Lactobacillus helveticus [48]). PrtS is organized in several structural and/or functional domains (Fig. 2) as recently described by Siezen (59) for the CEP of the above-mentioned species. Compared to the latter, PrtS differs mainly in its organization by the absence of a B domain (located between the A and H domains), as is the case for the pyogenic streptococcal proteinases (Fig. 2).
The first domain, the preprodomain, is removed during exportation and maturation processes. It is composed of a prosequence (109 aa) preceded by a probable classical 35-aa signal peptide common to exported proteins from gram-positive bacteria (45). The cleavage site for the signal peptide was predicted to be located between Ala35 and Asp36 by both the neural networks and the hidden Markov models developed by Nielsen et al. (47). The proof of the prosequence's removal was established firstly because the following amino acids corresponded to those of the N-terminal sequence of the purified protein, i.e., of the mature proteinase. Secondly, the molecular mass of the purified enzyme (153 kDa) was close to that deduced from the whole nucleotide sequence of prtS (169 kDa) without the propeptide (15.6 kDa). The subsequent domain (PR) (495 aa), corresponding to the N-terminal part of the mature proteinase, is the catalytic domain (Fig. 2). It has homologies with the subtilisin-like proteinases known as subtilases (60) and contains, as that of CEPs from LAB and pyogenic streptococci, a large insert (140 residues) that is absent in subtilisins. The PR domain is the domain best conserved between PrtS and the other CEPs, with amino acid identities ranging from 35% with CEPs from LAB to 40% with C5a peptidase from streptococci (Fig. 2). The PR domain of the cell wall proteinase Csp from S. agalactiae is composed of 495 aa and, among the 356 already reported, 77% are identical to those of PrtS (59). The central region of PrtS (the A domain [438 aa]) also shows homologies, to a lower extent, with that of the other CEPs, as 23 to 35% of the amino acids were identical (Fig. 2). The C-terminal part of PrtS is composed of three domains (Fig. 2). The first domain, the H domain (367 aa), is predicted to be rich in
-helix secondary structure (66%) and presents only low homology
with PrtP from lactococci and L. casei. The second domain,
the W domain (106 aa), has no homologies with CEPs or with other
proteins from the databases. It has the usual composition of the cell
wall domain of gram-positive bacteria since it contains unusually high
levels of Pro-Gly and Ser-Thr residues (16 and 20%, respectively)
(26). Finally, the third domain, the AN domain (35 aa), most
probably constitutes an anchor, with a typical LPXTG sorting motif
(here, LPNTG) (25) followed by a stretch of hydrophobic residues, predicted to constitute an
-helix and ending with a charged tail (55). It has homologies with the corresponding domain of PrtP from lactococci and L. casei (25 to 35%
identity) and of the C5a peptidase of S. agalactiae and
S. pyogenes (32% identity).
Amino acid alignments of PrtPs with subtilisin allowed the
identification of relevant substrate binding regions in CEP sequences (regions 126 to 147, 161 to 171, 216 to 225, 742 to 753)
(61). In these regions, the involvement of amino acids at
positions 138, 166, and 748 in substrate specificity has been
demonstrated by punctual mutagenesis (61). Alignment of the
PrtS sequence with those of other LAB CEPs showed a related but
different sequence for the proteinase of S. thermophilus, as
PrtS possesses original amino acids at positions 126, 128, 132 to 136, 143 to 144, 146, 161, 165, 167, 169, 171, 217 to 219, 222, 224, 743 to
746, 748, and 750 to 751 (Fig. 3). The
substrate binding sequences considered are only 40 and 41.5% identical
between PrtS and L. lactis PrtPI and PrtPIII, respectively,
while they are 93% identical between PrtP from L. casei and
L. lactis PrtPI.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PrtS, a member of the subtilase family. The proteinase PrtS from S. thermophilus is a subtilisin-like serine proteinase (subtilase), and as such, shares with the CEPs from LAB and streptococci a serine base catalysis and highly conserved residues around the catalytic triad (Asp95, Ser196, His424) (60). In the subtilase family, PrtS from S. thermophilus is more homologous to streptococcal proteinase due to its sequence and the absence of a B domain that is present in CEPs from the other LAB. As with the majority of subtilases, PrtS is synthesized as a preproenzyme, which is subsequently maturated. In lactococci and some lactobacilli, a lipoprotein (PrtM) acting as a chaperone is required in this maturation step (69). The gene encoding PrtM is located directly upstream of the prtP gene, and the promoters of the two genes overlap in lactococci and L. casei (33, 36). As in L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (30) and L. helvetivus (48), no gene potentially encoding a lipoprotein was found in the close vicinity of prtS from S. thermophilus. Thus, we don't know whether a PrtM-like protein is required for PrtS maturation.
Cell envelope anchoring and release of PrtS. PrtS is a cell wall-associated proteinase, with typical cell wall sorting signals of gram-positive bacteria located at its C terminus, i.e., an LPXTG motif followed by a hydrophobic domain and a charged tail constituting a cell wall anchor (55). This anchor is preceded by a Pro-, Gly-, Thr-, and Ser-rich region, which probably allows PrtS to span the cell wall with strong and tight linkage to the peptidoglycan, as proposed for the fructosyltransferase of Streptococcus salivarius (52). Thanks to its LPXTG motif, PrtS is probably covalently associated to the cell wall; such motifs present in surface proteins of Gram-positive bacteria are specifically recognized by a sortase that amide links the threonine residue to the peptidic cross-bridge of the peptidoglycan (41).
The CEPs from most LAB are released by incubating the cells in a Ca2+-free buffer (43), which induces the loss of weakly bound Ca2+ ions, leading to the exposure of a site susceptible to autoproteolysis (20). This Ca2+-binding site and the autoproteolytic site are most probably located in the B domain of the CEP (8). As PrtS lacks this B domain, it could not be released from the cell envelope in the same way as lactococcal PrtP. The probable cell wall covalent linkage of PrtS could explain the failure of detergent and cell wall-destabilizing treatments to release it. Lytic enzymes were successfully used for the release of lactococcal and lactobacilli PrtP (13, 23), lactobacilli PrtB (63), and C5a peptidase from group B streptococci (4) but allowed only a low level of PrtS release, perhaps because the S. thermophilus cell wall has a different susceptibility or accessibility to lysozyme. Finally, we succeeded in releasing PrtS from the cell wall by cultivating the cells in the presence of glycine followed by mechanical cell disruption and enzymatic treatment of the cell envelopes. Glycine is known to inhibit the peptide cross-linking of the peptidoglycan since it is incorporated in peptidoglycan precursors instead of alanine (31). Cultivation of the cells in the presence of glycine could thus enhance the susceptibility of the cell wall to lysozyme by leading to a more loosely cross-linked peptidoglycan.Substrate specificity of PrtS.
The substrate specificity of
PrtS from S. thermophilus on both chromogenic and casein
substrates indicated that PrtS from strain CNRZ 385 is intermediate
between the most divergent types, PrtPI and PrtPIII, as is the case for
the lactobacillus CEPs (24, 40) and for the majority of
lactococcal PrtP (5, 18). The PrtS sequence is consistent
with this observation, since the substrate binding residues of PrtS are
totally identical to neither those of PrtPI nor those of PrtPIII but
are a combination of them, with unique residues as well. Furthermore,
the variability in substrate specificity towards the
s1-casein-(1-23) fragment of CEPs is correlated with a
variability in the substrate binding residues (18). In this
regard, PrtS from strain CNRZ 385 possesses a unique substrate binding
site among the CEPs from LAB which have been characterized up to now.
Origin of PrtS. The presence of a high cell wall proteinase activity is common in L. lactis, whereas it is unusual in S. thermophilus (56). In L. lactis, this property probably results in an adaptation of the bacterium to the milk environment. The lactococcal prtP gene is indeed most frequently located on a plasmid that also carries the genes necessary for lactose utilization (35). In S. thermophilus, this infrequent characteristic could result from a different way that S. thermophilus ensures its growth in milk with regards to nitrogen nutrition. In dairy products, S. thermophilus is in fact often associated, in a symbiotic way, with lactobacilli which are known to be more proteolytic than S. thermophilus (51, 58) and to supply the latter with assimilable nitrogen compounds (2, 49, 58). Furthermore, S. thermophilus is qualitatively less demanding in regard to amino acids than lactococci are (15, 46; C. Letort and V. Juillard, personal communication).
On the basis of the infrequent presence of highly active CEPs in S. thermophilus, we can speculate that PrtS originates from a transfer of a proteinase gene from another bacterium, as suggested by the presence of signals of DNA rearrangement in the close vicinity of the prtS gene.Role of PrtS. Strains CNRZ 385 and 703 of S. thermophilus were first characterized by their rapid growth and high acidification rate in milk (1, 56). This rapid growth was then correlated with the presence of high proteinase activity associated with the cell wall of these strains, since a nitrosoguanidine proteinase-negative mutant of strain CNRZ 385 presented a low acidification rate in milk (56). Thus, as observed for the CEPs from the other LAB, the main role of PrtS concerns the amino acid supply to the cell via casein hydrolysis (56).
As already demonstrated for LAB CEPs (7, 27, 28, 62), PrtS, via its substrate specificity, probably has two main technological implications: firstly, in bacterial optimal development and consequently in milk acidification rate; secondly, in cheese ripening and flavor development. In addition, LAB cell wall proteinases could be involved in the development of dairy product health properties via bioactive peptide production, as has already been demonstrated with antihypertensive peptide production by the L. helveticus proteinase (39). With a proteinase-negative mutant, under construction, we will specify the functions of PrtS and the consequences of its presence during symbiotic growth and during ripening. In addition, the specificity studies presented in this work need to be widened to include other S. thermophilus strains in order to evaluate the biodiversity of the S. thermophilus cell wall proteinase.| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
M.D.F.-E. was a recipient of a training grant from the European Union (contract BIO4-CT98-5043).
We thank J. C. Huet for N-terminal protein sequencing, C. Beauvallet for mass spectrometry analysis, C. Ouali for
51-casein-(1-23) fragment synthesis, and A. Lopez for
her technical suggestion for gene sequencing. We are grateful to
J. C. Gripon for critical reading of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Unité de Recherche de Biochimie et Structure des Protéines, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas Cedex, France. Phone: (33) 1 34 65 21 49. Fax: (33) 1 34 65 21 63. E-mail: rul{at}jouy.inra.fr.
Present address: Instituto del Frío (CSIC), Departamento de
Cienca y Tecnología de Productos Lácteos, Ciudad
Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Accolas, J. P., R. Bloquel, R. Didienne, and J. Regnier. 1977. Propriétés acidifiantes des bactéries lactiques thermophiles en relation avec la fabrication du yoghourt. Lait 561-562:1-23. |
| 2. | Bautista, E. S., R. S. Dahiya, and M. L. Speck. 1966. Identification of compounds causing symbiotic growth of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus in milk J. Dairy Res. 33:299-307. |
| 3. | Blum, H., H. Beier, and H. J. Gross. 1987. Improved silver staining of plant proteins, RNA and DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis 8:93-99[CrossRef]. |
| 4. | Bohnsack, J. F., X. Zhou, P. A. Williams, P. P. Cleary, C. J. Parker, and H. R. Hill. 1991. Purification of the proteinase from group B streptococci that inactivates human C5a. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1079:222-228[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. | Boutrou, R., A. Sepulchre, J. C. Gripon, and V. Monnet. 1998. Simple tests for predicting the lytic behaviour and proteolytic activity of lactococcal strains in cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 81:2321-2328[Abstract]. |
| 6. | Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248-254[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. | Broadbent, J. R., M. Strickland, B. C. Weimer, M. E. Johnson, and J. Steele. 1998. Peptide accumulation and bitterness in Cheddar cheese made using single-strain Lactococcus lactis starters with distinct proteinase specificity. J. Dairy Sci. 81:327-337[Abstract]. |
| 8. | Bruinenberg, P. G., W. M. De Vos, and R. J. Siezen. 1994. Prevention of C-terminal processing of Lactococcus lactis SK11 cell-envelope proteinase by engineering of an essential surface loop. Biochem. J. 302:957-963. |
| 9. | Bruinenberg, P. G., and G. K. Y. Limsowtin. 1995. Diversity of proteolytic enzymes among lactococci. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 50:47-50. |
| 10. |
Chen, C. C., and P. P. Cleary.
1990.
Complete nucleotide sequence of the streptococcal C5a peptidase gene of Streptococcus pyogenes.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:3161-3167 |
| 11. | Chmouriguina, I., A. Suvorov, P. Ferrieri, and P. P. Cleary. 1996. Conservation of the C5a peptidase genes in group A and B streptococci. Infect. Immun. 64:2387-2390[Abstract]. |
| 12. | Christensen, J. E., E. G. Dudley, J. A. Pederson, and J. L. Steele. 1999. Peptidases and amino acid catabolism in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 76:217-246. |
| 13. |
Coolbear, T.,
J. R. Reid, and G. G. Pritchard.
1992.
Stability and specificity of the cell wall-associated proteinase from Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris H2 released by treatment with lysozyme in the presence of calcium ions.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
58:3263-3270 |
| 14. | Coolbear, T., C. J. Pillidge, and V. L. Crow. 1994. The diversity of potential cheese ripening characteristics of lactic acid starter bacteria. 1. Resistance to cell lysis and levels and cellular distribution of proteinase activities. Int. Dairy J. 4:697-721[CrossRef]. |
| 15. | Desmazeaud, M. 1983. L'état des connaissances en matière de nutrition des bactéries lactiques. Lait 63:267-316[CrossRef]. |
| 16. | Devereux, J., P. Haerberli, and O. Smithies. 1984. A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:387-395. |
| 17. | Donnelly, W. J., J. G. Barry, and Y. Richardson. 1980. 14C-Methylated casein as a substrate for plasmin and its application to the study of milk protein transformations. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 626:117-126[Medline]. |
| 18. | Exterkate, F. A. 1995. The lactococcal cell envelope proteinases: differences, calcium-binding effects and role in cheese ripening. Int. Dairy J. 5:995-1018[CrossRef]. |
| 19. |
Exterkate, F. A., and A. C. Alting.
1993.
The conversion of the s1-casein (1-23)-fragment by the free and bound form of the cell-envelope proteinase of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris in conditions prevailing in cheese.
Syst. Appl. Microbiol.
16:1-8.
|
| 20. |
Exterkate, F. A., and A. C. Alting.
1999.
Role of calcium in activity and stability of the Lactococcus lactis cell envelope proteinase.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:1390-1396 |
| 21. |
Exterkate, F. A.,
A. C. Alting, and C. J. Slangen.
1991.
Specificity of two genetically related cell-envelope proteinases of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris towards s1-casein-(1-23)-fragment.
Biochem. J.
273:135-139.
|
| 22. |
Exterkate, F. A.,
A. C. Alting, and P. G. Bruinenberg.
1993.
Diversity of cell envelope specificity among strains of Lactococcus lactis and its relationship to charge characteristics on the substrate-binding region.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
59:3640-3647 |
| 23. | Fernández de Palencia, P., C. Peláez, T. Requena, and M. C. Martín-Hernández. 1995. Release and partial characterization of cell-envelope proteinases from Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis IFPL 359 and Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei IFPL 731 isolated from goat's-milk cheese. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. 201:87-90[CrossRef]. |
| 24. | Fernández de Palencia, P., C. Peláez, C. Romero, and M. C. Martín-Hernández. 1997. Purification and characterization of the cell wall proteinase of Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei IFPL 731 isolated from raw goat's milk cheese. J. Agric. Food Chem. 45:3401-3405[CrossRef]. |
| 25. | Fischetti, V. A., V. Pancholi, and O. Schneewind. 1990. Conservation of a hexapeptide sequence in the anchor region of surface proteins from Gram-positive cocci. Mol. Microbiol. 4:1603-1605[Medline]. |
| 26. | Fischetti, V. A., V. Pancholi, and O. Schneewind. 1991. Common characteristics of the surface proteins from gram-positive cocci. Appendix 1, p. 290-294. In G. M. Dunny, P. P. Clear, and L. L. McKay (ed.), Genetics and molecular biology of streptococci, lactococci, and enterococci. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
| 27. | Flambard, B., J. Richard, and V. Juillard. 1997. Interaction between proteolytic strains of Lactococcus lactis influenced by different types of proteinase during growth in milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:2131-2135[Abstract]. |
| 28. |
Flambard, B.,
S. Helinck,
J. Richard, and V. Juillard.
1998.
The contribution of caseins to the amino acid supply for Lactococcus lactis depends on the type of cell envelope proteinase.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:1991-1996 |
| 29. | Gibson, T. J. 1984. Studies on the Epstein Barr virus genome. Ph.D. thesis. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England. |
| 30. |
Gilbert, C.,
D. Atlan,
B. Blanc,
R. Portalier,
J. E. Germond,
L. Lapierre, and B. Mollet.
1996.
A new cell surface proteinase: sequencing and analysis of the prtB gene from Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus.
J. Bacteriol.
178:3059-3065 |
| 31. |
Hammes, W.,
K. H. Schleifer, and O. Kandler.
1973.
Mode of action of glycine on the biosynthesis of peptidoglycan.
J. Bacteriol.
116:1029-1053 |
| 32. | Hanahan, D., J. Jessee, and F. R. Bloom. 1985. Plasmid transformation of Escherichia coli and other bacteria. Methods Enzymol. 204:63-113. |
| 33. |
Holck, A., and H. Naes.
1992.
Cloning, sequencing and expression of the gene encoding the cell-envelope-associated proteinase from Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei NCDO 151.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
138:1353-1364 |
| 34. | Isegawa, Y., J. Sheng, Y. Sokawa, K. Yamanishi, O. Nakagomi, and U. Shigeharu. 1992. Selective amplification of cDNA sequence from total RNA by cassette-ligation mediated polymerase chain reaction (PCR): application to sequencing 6.5 kb genome segment of hantavirus strain B-1. Mol. Cell. Probes 6:467-475[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 35. | Kok, J. 1990. Genetics of proteolytic system of lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 76:2056-2064. |
| 36. |
Kok, J.,
K. J. Leenhouts,
A. J. Haandrikman,
A. M. Ledeboer, and G. Venema.
1988.
Nucleotide sequence of the cell wall proteinase gene of Streptococcus cremoris Wg2.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
54:231-238 |
| 37. | Kunji, E. R. S., I. Mierau, A. Hagting, B. Poolman, and W. N. Konings. 1996. The proteolytic systems of lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 70:187-221[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 38. | Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature (London) 227:680-685[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 39. | Maeno, M., N. Yamamoto, and T. Takano. 1996. Identification of an hypertensive peptide from casein hydrolysate produced by a proteinase from Lb. helveticus CP790. J. Dairy Sci. 79:1316-1321[Abstract]. |
| 40. | Martín-Hernández, M. C., A. C. Alting, and F. A. Exterkate. 1994. Purification and characterization of the mature, membrane-associated cell-envelope proteinase of Lactobacillus helveticus L89. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 40:828-834[CrossRef]. |
| 41. |
Mazmanian, S.,
G. K. Liu,
H. Ton-That, and O. Schneewind.
1999.
Staphylococcus aureus sortase, an enzyme that anchors surface proteins to the cell wall.
Science
285:760-763 |
| 42. |
McIver, K. S.,
A. S. Heath,
B. D. Greenand, and J. R. Scott.
1995.
Specific binding of the activator Mga to promoter sequences of the emm and scpA genes in the group A Streptococcus.
J. Bacteriol.
177:6619-6624 |
| 43. | Mills, O. E., and T. D. Thomas. 1978. Release of cell wall-associated proteinase(s) from lactic streptococci. N. Z. J. Dairy Sci. Technol. 13:209-215. |
| 44. | Monnet, V., D. Le Bars, and J. C. Gripon. 1987. Partial characterization and comparison of cell wall proteinases from 5 strains of Streptococcus lactis. Lait 67:51-61[CrossRef]. |
| 45. |
Navarre, W. W., and O. Schneewind.
1999.
Surface proteins of Gram-positive bacteria and mechanisms of their targeting to the cell wall envelope.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
63:174-229 |
| 46. | Neviani, E., G. Giraffa, A. Brizzi, and D. Carminati. 1995. Amino acid requirements and peptidase activities of Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 79:302-307[Medline]. |
| 47. |
Nielsen, H.,
J. Engelbrecht,
S. Brunak, and G. Von Heijne.
1997.
Identification of procaryotic and eucaryotic signal peptides prediction of their cleavage sites.
Protein Eng.
10:1-6 |
| 48. |
Perderson, J. A.,
G. J. Mileski,
B. C. Weimer, and J. L. Steele.
1999.
Genetic characterization of a cell envelope-associated proteinase from Lactobacillus helveticus CNRZ32.
J. Bacteriol.
181:4592-4597 |
| 49. | Pette, J. W., and H. Lolkema. 1950. Yogurt. II. Growth stimulating factor for Streptococcus thermophilus. Neth. Milk Dairy J. 4:209-224. |
| 50. | Pospiech, A., and B. Neumann. 1995. A versatile quick-prep of genomic DNA from Gram-positive bacteria. Trends Genet. 11:217-218[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 51. | Rajagopal, S. N., and W. E. Sandine. 1990. Associative growth and proteolysis of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus in skim milk. J. Dairy Sci. 73:894-899[Abstract]. |
| 52. |
Rathsam, C., and N. A. Jacques.
1998.
Role of C-terminal domains in surface attachment of the fructosyltransferase of Streptococcus salivarius ATCC 25975.
J. Bacteriol.
180:6400-6403 |
| 53. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 54. | Schechter, I., and A. Berger. 1967. On the size of the active site in proteases. I. Papain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 27:157-162[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 55. | Schneewind, O., D. Mihaylova-Petkov, and P. Model. 1993. Cell wall sorting signals in surface proteins of Gram-positive bacteria. EMBO J. 12:4801-4811. |
| 56. | Shahbal, S., D. Hemme, and M. Desmazeaud. 1991. High cell wall-associated proteinase activity of some Streptococcus thermophilus strains (H-strains) correlated with a high acidification rate in milk. Lait 71:351-357[CrossRef]. |
| 57. |
Shahbal, S.,
D. Hemme, and P. Renault.
1993.
Characterization of a cell envelope-associated proteinase activity from Streptococcus thermophilus H-strains.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
59:177-172 |
| 58. | Shankar, P. A., and F. L. Davies. 1978. Proteinase and peptidase activities of yogurt starter bacteria, p. 473. In Proceedings of the XX International Dairy CongressParis. |
| 59. | Siezen, R. J. 1999. Multi-domain, cell-envelope proteinases of lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 76:139-155. |
| 60. | Siezen, R. J., and J. A. M. Leunissen. 1997. Subtilases: the superfamily of subtilisin-like serine proteases. Protein Sci. 6:501-523[Medline]. |
| 61. |
Siezen, R. J.,
P. G. Bruinenberg,
P. Vos,
I. J. Van Alen-Boerrigter,
M. Nijhuis,
A. C. Alting,
F. A. Exterkate, and W. M. De Vos.
1993.
Engineering of the substrate-binding region of the subtilisin-like, cell envelope proteinase of Lactococcus lactis.
Protein Eng.
6:927-937 |
| 62. | Stadhouders, J., L. Toepoel, and J. T. M. Wouters. 1988. Cheese making with prt- and prt+ variants of N-streptococci and their mixtures. Phage sensitivity, proteolysis and flavour development during cheese ripening. Neth. Milk Dairy J. 42:183-193. |
| 63. | Stefanisti, D., G. Sakellaris, and J. R. Garel. 1995. The presence of two proteinases associated with the cell wall of Lactobacillus bulgaricus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 128:53-58[CrossRef]. |
| 64. | Terzaghi, B. E., and W. E. Sandine. 1975. Improved medium for lactic streptococci and their bacteriophages. Appl. Microbiol. 29:807-813. |
| 65. | Thomas, T. D., and O. E. Mills. 1981. Proteolytic enzymes of starter bacteria. Neth. Milk Dairy J. 35:255-273. |
| 66. |
Visser, S.,
F. A. Exterkate,
C. J. Slangen, and J. C. M. De Veer.
1986.
Comparative study of action of cell wall proteinases from various strains of Streptococcus cremoris on bovine s1-, -, and -casein.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
52:1162-1166 |
| 67. |
Vos, P.,
G. Simons,
R. J. Siezen, and W. M. De Vos.
1989.
Primary structure and organization of the gene for a procaryotic cell envelope-associated serine proteinase.
J. Biol. Chem.
264:13579-13589 |
| 68. |
Vos, P.,
I. J. Van Alen-Boerrigter,
G. Buist,
A. J. Haandrikman,
M. Nijhuis,
M. B. de Reuver,
R. J. Siezen,
G. Venema,
W. M. de Vos, and J. Kok.
1991.
Engineering of the Lactococcus lactis serine proteinase by construction of hybrid enzymes.
Protein Eng.
4:479-484 |
| 69. |
Vos, P.,
M. Van Asseldonk,
F. Van Jeveren,
R. J. Siezen,
G. Simons, and W. M. de Vos.
1989.
A maturation protein is essential for production of active forms of Lactococcus lactis SK11 serine proteinase located in or secreted from the cell envelope.
J. Bacteriol.
171:2795-2802 |
| 70. | Zevaco, C., V. Monnet, and J. C. Gripon. 1990. Intracellular X-prolyl dipeptidyl peptidase from Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis: purification and properties. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 68:357-366. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»