Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2000, p. 855-859, Vol. 66, No. 2
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
A Selective Medium and a Specific Probe for
Detection of Vibrio vulnificus
Marta
Cerdà-Cuéllar,*
Joan
Jofre, and
Anicet R.
Blanch
Departament de Microbiologia, Facultat de
Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Received 8 August 1999/Accepted 6 December 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
A selective medium (VVM) and a specific 16S rRNA gene (rDNA) probe
(V3VV) for the detection of Vibrio vulnificus were
developed. The medium contains D-(+)-cellobiose as the main
carbon source and electrolytes (MgCl2-6H2O and
KCl), which stimulate bacterial growth. Polymyxin B, colistin, and
moderate alkalinity and salinity provide selectivity properties.
V. vulnificus grows on VVM as flat, bright yellow colonies.
Other Vibrio species tested either did not grow or showed
green-bluish colonies, with the exception of V. campbelli,
V. carchariae, and V. navarrensis. There
is a higher colony count on VVM agar than on cellobiose-colistin agar or on modified cellobiose-polymyxin B-colistin agar. The specific probe
was evaluated by colony hybridization and dot blot hybridization with
PCR-amplified 16S rDNA using collection strains and environmental isolates. No strain studied other than V. vulnificus showed
positive hybridization with this oligonucleotide. The combined use of
VVM agar and the V3VV probe provided the recovery of V. vulnificus from mixed bacterial suspensions and spiked mussels.
 |
TEXT |
Vibrio vulnificus is a
ubiquitous bacterium found in estuarine and marine environments. It
comprises two biotypes: biotype 1 strains are pathogenic in humans,
while biotype 2 strains are virulent in eels and opportunistic in
humans, although they have been thought to be pathogenic only for eels
until recently (2). It has been isolated from a wide variety
of marine organisms, such as oysters, crabs, fish, mussels, shellfish,
and plankton (10, 17, 18, 36), and from water and sediment
(34). It is well known that raw-shellfish consumption
increases the risk of human vibrio diseases. Particularly, V. vulnificus can cause fulminant and severe systemic human
illness after the consumption of infected raw oysters (30).
Mortality rates of up to 60% have been reported in such infections
(18). It is remarkably virulent in individuals who are
immunocompromised or have liver dysfunction, which results in increased
levels of iron in serum (18, 28). Thus, its occurrence in
aquatic environments is of concern to shellfish industries and public
health agencies.
Because a great number and variety of indigenous bacteria are present
in the environment together with some pathogenic
Vibrio species, the isolation of V. vulnificus is usually performed by enrichment in alkaline
peptone water (APW) or in APW supplemented with polymyxin B. However,
this enrichment also increases the number of other bacteria, which
requires further inoculation of the enriched sample on selective
media (10, 16) such as V. vulnificus agar
(7), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polymyxin B-sucrose (SPS)
agar (21), cellobiose-polymyxin B-colistin (CPC) agar
(23), V. vulnificus enumeration agar
(24), modified CPC (mCPC) agar (33), and
cellobiose-colistin (CC) agar (16). The recovery of
V. vulnificus was higher with CPC agar than with thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose (TCBS), V. vulnificus
enumeration, or SDS-polymyxin-sucrose agar (20, 23, 29, 31,
32). Later, CPC agar was modified (mCPC) by reducing the
concentration of colistin (33), which improved the recovery
and isolation of V. vulnificus from environmental sources.
Recently, a new modification of CPC agar has been described
(16).
To identify presumptive V. vulnificus recovered from these
media, probes based on the cytolysin gene of V. vulnificus
have been developed (11, 25, 37). The possible loss or
rearrangement of nonessential genes, such as the cytotoxin-hemolysin
gene, can lead to a false-negative result (12). Another
method for molecular detection of V. vulnificus based on the
23S rRNA gene (rDNA) using nested PCR has been developed
(4). However, certain molecular techniques cannot be used
for the routine monitoring of environmental samples because of PCR
inhibition (37). In this study, a new selective medium (VVM
agar), which improves the recovery of V. vulnificus, and
a specific probe (V3VV) have been established. The medium contains
electrolytes that improve the recovery of V. vulnificus. The
probe based on 16S rRNA sequences was evaluated by dot blot
hybridization with PCR-amplified 16S rDNA and then by colony hybridization.
Thirty-eight collection strains, mainly Vibrio
strains, were first used to evaluate the VVM medium and the V3VV
probe (Table 1). Moreover, 232 Vibrio strains from several environmental origins were
used to assess the selectivity of the new medium and the specificity of
the probe (Table 2). These strains
are available from the LMG collection (Laboratory of Microbiology,
Ghent, Belgium). Sixteen V. vulnificus strains, from culture
collections, of clinical and environmental origins, were used in
the plating efficiency experiments. Sixty-four V. vulnificus strains of clinical and environmental origins (13 and 51 strains, respectively) were used for confirmation of the
species specificity studies with the V3VV probe. V. cholerae
CECT 658, V. mimicus LMG7896T, and V. vulnificus NCIMB 2046T were used to determine the
threshold of detection when mixed bacterial suspensions were analyzed.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
List of the collection strains used to evaluate the
selectivity of VVM and the specificity of the V3VV probe
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Results obtained with environmental isolates used to
evaluate the selective medium VVM and the specificity of the
V3VV probe
|
|
Selective VVM agar.
The potential components of the medium
were evaluated according to the differential metabolic features of the
genus Vibrio and V. vulnificus (1,
15). After several compositions and growth conditions were
assayed, the selective medium chosen had the following
composition: D-(+)-cellobiose, 15 g; NaCl, 10 g, yeast extract, 4 g; MgCl2·6H2O, 4 g; KCl, 4 g; cresol red, 40 mg; bromothymol blue, 40 mg; polymyxin
B, 105 U/liter; colistin methanesulfonate, 105
U/liter; agar, 15 g; distilled water, 1,000 ml. The compounds were
dissolved with stirring and boiling. The pH was adjusted to 8.5 with 5 M NaOH after cooling to 50°C. VVM does not require autoclaving. The
uninoculated VVM plates are violet-blue. The presumptive identification
of V. vulnificus is based on the fermentation of
D-(+)-cellobiose, which determines the color of the
colonies. The colonies are bright yellow with a yellow diffusion halo.
Overnight cultures of each of the 38 collection strains and the 232 Vibrio spp. were plated on nonselective Trypticase soy agar
supplemented with 1.5% NaCl (TSA2). Cell suspensions (McFarland
standard no. 3) of these cultures were made in sterile
phosphate-buffered saline complemented with 1.5% NaCl at pH 7.2 (marine PBS). The specificity of the medium was studied by inoculation
of 10 µl of each cell suspension onto a plate of VVM agar. Inoculated
plates were incubated at 37°C and examined after 24 and 48 h of
incubation. As a control, 10 µl of the same suspension was spotted
onto TSA2. Plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C or at 25°C
in the case of Vibrio spp. which do not grow at 37°C
(V. costicola, V. logei, V. ordalii, and V. splendidus).
In VVM agar,
V. vulnificus was easily distinguishable from
other
Vibrio strains and other gram-negative bacteria. All
of the
culture collection strains of
V. vulnificus tested
showed bright
yellow colonies with a yellow diffusion halo on VVM agar
because
of the fermentation of
D-(+)-cellobiose (Table
1).
Most of the
culture collection strains tested either did not grow or
showed
green-bluish colonies on VVM agar. Three type strains also
displayed
bright yellow colonies on the medium:
V. campbellii,
V. carchariae,
and
V. navarrensis (Table
1). When the environmental strains
were
assayed, all of the
V. vulnificus strains tested presented
bright yellow colonies with a yellow diffusion halo on VVM agar.
Most
of the environmental strains either did not grow or gave
green-bluish
colonies on VVM agar (Table
2). The use of
D-(+)-cellobiose
as the main carbon source, the antibiotics polymyxin B and colistin,
and moderate alkalinity and salinity provides the medium with
the
selectivity and differential properties needed to detect
V. vulnificus. Taxonomic studies (
15) reported that over
90% of
the strains of
V. vulnificus ferment
D-(+)-cellobiose and are
resistant to colistin and
polymyxin B. These properties are not
common among members of the
family
Vibrionaceae. However, there
are a few
Vibrio species that ferment
D-(+)-cellobiose,
are resistant
to colistin and polymyxin B, and grow at 37°C:
V. aestuarianus,
V. alginolyticus,
V. anguillarum,
V. campbellii,
V. carchariae,
V. harveyi, and
V. navarrensis (
1,
15). Our results are consistent
with these observations (Table
1
and
2). The pH of VVM agar
was adjusted to 8.5, which has been reported
to be optimum for
the growth of
Vibrio spp. (
14).
Specific 16S rDNA probe.
Full sequences of the 16S rDNAs of 47 Vibrio strains deposited in the EMBL genomic database were
compared. Five of them belonged to V. vulnificus. Multiple
alignment and visualization of homologies were performed by the methods
of Needleman and Wunsch (26) and Devereux et al.
(13), respectively. An oligonucleotide of 24 nucleotides
(5'-GTC TGC CAG TTT CAA ATG CAG TTC-3') located between positions 618 and 641 of the sequence of the 16S rDNA of Escherichia coli
(8) was defined for use as a probe (V3VV). The specificity of V3VV was initially evaluated by comparing its sequences with the
sequences of the EMBL database using the FASTA software
(13). The oligonucleotide was synthesized and labeled at the
5' end with digoxigenin (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany). The
specificity was evaluated by DNA-DNA hybridization using culture
collection strains (Table 1). To that end, the 16S rDNAs of the 38 collection strains were first amplified. A colony from an overnight
culture on TSA2 at 37°C was used to extract the DNA template
using the Instagene Matrix Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.).
PCR was performed using the AmpliTaq DNA polymerase kit (The
Perkin-Elmer Corp., Norwalk, Conn.) in accordance with the instructions
of the manufacturer. The PCR program was 1 cycle of 95°C for 0.5 min;
35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2.5 min; and 1 cycle of 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for
3 min. An aliquot of 200 µl of a 1:10 dilution in 2× SSC (1× SSC is
0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate) of the amplified DNA was
blotted onto nylon membranes (Hybond N; Amersham, Amersham, United
Kingdom), using Minifold-I equipment (Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel,
Germany) and cross-linked. After the establishment of the conditions of stringency, the hybridization was performed at 68°C as described by
Martínez-Picado et al. (22), with minor
modifications. The washing steps after hybridization were performed
using 2× SSC-0.1% SDS at 68°C and 0.5× SSC-0.1% SDS at room
temperature. Detection of probe chemiluminescence was performed with
CSPD (Boehringer) as the substrate for alkaline phosphatase.
Later, specificity was also tested by colony hybridization using
collection and environmental strains (Table 2). To perform colony
hybridization, bacteria were grown on nylon membranes (Hybond
N+; Amersham) deposited onto TSA2 plates and incubated
overnight at 37°C. Membranes were processed for hybridization
as described above and by Martínez-Picado et al.
(22).
In order to study the ecology of
V. vulnificus and to
evaluate the public health threat it constitutes, several biochemical
and molecular methods have been developed. PCR tools for the detection
of
V. vulnificus have been used for environmental samples
(
4,
5,
6,
9). The presence of PCR inhibitors in such samples
can hinder the amplification of the target molecules. Other molecular
methods, such as hybridization with probes (plCVD702 and VVAP)
directed
against the cytolysin gene (
25,
37), are sensitive
and
specific for the detection of strains carrying this gene.
The
V. vulnificus strains that do not have this gene cannot be
detected by hybridization with these probes. On the other hand,
hybridization based on cytolysin probes may give signal strength
variations due to loss or rearrangement of the gene (
12).
All
of the
V. vulnificus strains tested hybridized with the
probe
V3VV (Tables
1 and
2). No strain studied, other than
V. vulnificus (of environmental, clinical, and culture collection
origins),
showed yellow colonies on VVM and positive hybridization with
this
oligonucleotide.
Comparison of VVM and other selective agars.
The
efficiency of recovery on VVM agar was determined by comparing
the colony counts of V. vulnificus on this medium with those
on TSA2 and TCBS. Moreover, recovery on VVM agar was also compared with
that on other selective media: mCPC and CC agars. TCBS (Oxoid) agar was
prepared in accordance with the instructions of the manufacturer. The
composition and preparation of the CC and mCPC agars have been
described elsewhere (16, 33). Overnight cultures of each of
the 16 V. vulnificus strains tested were prepared by
growing them in Trypticase soy broth supplemented with 1.5% NaCl at
37°C. Tenfold dilutions of the overnight cultures in marine PBS
were prepared. An aliquot of 10 µl of each dilution was inoculated in
triplicate onto CC, mCPC, VVM, TCBS, and TSA2, and the spots were
allowed to be absorbed. TSA2, TCBS, and VVM plates were incubated at
37°C, and mCPC and CC plates were incubated at 40°C as
previously recommended (16, 33). Colonies were counted at
24 h and confirmed at 48 h. Efficiency of recovery was
calculated by determining plating efficiency as described by Høi et
al. (16). This term is defined as the percentage of CFU that
can be recovered on a selective medium compared to the CFU encountered
on a corresponding reference medium. Plating efficiencies on the
different selective media were compared by using one-way analysis of
variance with least significant differences between means using
Student's t test (Statgraphics Statistical Graphics System;
Manugistics, Inc. and Statistical Graphica Corporation; Rockville,
Md.).
VVM agar yielded, with respect to TSA2, a mean plating efficiency of
V. vulnificus of 89%, while the mCPC and CC agars showed
plating efficiencies of 37 and 67%, respectively (Table
3). Variations
in plating efficiency
among the 16
V. vulnificus strains tested
caused elevated
standard deviations. VVM agar showed significantly
higher plating
efficiency than mCPC or CC agar with respect to
TSA2 (
P < 0.05). It is worth pointing out that CC agar contains
less
antibiotic than VVM agar. The higher recovery on VVM agar
could be due
to MgCl
2·6H
2O and KCl, which have been
described
as stimulation growth factors for pathogenic
Vibrio spp. (
14).
No differences were observed at
24 or 48 h in any of the tested
media. No significant differences
in plating efficiency with respect
to TCBS were observed between the
VVM and CC agars. However, significantly
higher plating efficiency
(
P < 0.01) was obtained with respect
to TCBS
agar between the VVM and mCPC agars (Table
3). Although
VVM agar
seems to be more stressful than TCBS agar, it allows
much clearer
differentiation of
V. vulnificus. TCBS agar was originally
developed for the isolation of
Vibrio spp. that are
pathogenic
in humans. It has been widely recommended for the isolation
of
V. vulnificus from clinical samples, but it has also been
frequently
used as the primary isolation medium in ecological studies.
However,
several studies have reported brand-to-brand variations
in the
growth of pathogenic
Vibrio spp., such as
V. vulnificus, on TCBS,
as well as considerable variations
in the recovery rate (
27,
35).
Recovery of V. vulnificus from mixed bacterial
populations.
In order to determine the efficiency of recovery and
the sensitivity of the medium, V. vulnificus from mixed
bacterial cell suspensions was detected. Cultures of V. vulnificus NCIMB 2046T V. cholerae
CECT 658, and V. mimicus LMG 7896T grown
overnight in Trypticase soy broth-1.5% NaCl at 37°C were prepared. Sets of 10-fold dilutions of each culture were obtained in
marine PBS. Several cell proportions (1:10, 1:100, and 1:1,000) of
V. vulnificus and V. cholerae and of V. vulnificus and V. mimicus were assayed. Aliquots
of 100 µl of each mixed suspension were inoculated in duplicate on
VVM agar and TSA2. Inoculated plates were incubated at 37°C for
24 h. Colony counts on both media were performed. Yellow (V. vulnificus) and blue (V. cholerae or V. mimicus) colonies on VVM agar were counted.
The colonies of
V. vulnificus (flat, yellow colonies with a
yellow halo) were easily differentiated from
V. cholerae and
V. mimicus on VVM agar, which showed round, blue-green
colonies when
the detection of
V. vulnificus in mixed
bacterial suspensions
was studied. It was possible to visualize 1 colony of
V. vulnificus among 10
3 colonies
of
V. cholerae. A similar situation took place when
V. vulnificus and
V. mimicus were mixed. This level of
detection
is difficult to surpass because of the limitations of the
visualization
of colonies growing on a
plate.
Recovery of V. vulnificus from spiked mussels.
Since the occurrence of virulent strains of V. vulnificus
has been related, in some cases, to shellfish consumption, the
threshold of detection of this species on VVM agar was tested with
mussel samples. Mussels were spiked with a pure culture of V. vulnificus NCIMB 2046T with a known concentration
(3.16 × 105 CFU/ml). The mussels were collected in
the Delta de l'Ebre (Spanish Mediterranean coast) and processed as
follows. They were aseptically shucked with an autoclaved oyster knife
to obtain 50 g of mussel meat, which was homogenized in a sterile
blender. The homogenate of mussels was diluted in 50 ml of marine PBS
and stirred for 20 min. The resulting suspension was filtered through
nylon gauze with a 54-µm pore size to remove thick particles. The
filtered suspension was then distributed in 5 aliquots of 5 ml each. An overnight culture of V. vulnificus NCIMB 2046T
was prepared in TSB2 at 37°C, and 10-fold dilutions in marine PBS
were prepared to obtain concentrations of 105 to
102 CFU of bacteria per ml. Four aliquots of the
filtered suspension of mussels were spiked with 1 ml of each dilution
of the V. vulnificus culture. One, the negative
control, was not spiked. Thereafter, 10-fold dilutions of the spiked
and control suspensions in marine PBS were prepared. An aliquot of 100 µl of each dilution was plated in duplicate on TSA2 and VVM agar
plates, which were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Total and
presumptive V. vulnificus (yellow) colony counts were
performed. Replica plating was carried out on nylon membranes (Hybond
N+; Amersham) in order to confirm the detection of V. vulnificus colonies on VVM agar. Later, colony hybridization
with the specific digoxigenin-labeled V3VV probe was performed at
68°C as described above. The locations of probe-positive signals on
autoradiograms were compared with the positions of yellow
colonies on VVM agar.
Yellow colonies were observed on the plates from the control sample,
where no
V. vulnificus was added. However, none of them
hybridized with the V3VV probe. Consequently, they were not
V. vulnificus. The final concentrations of
V. vulnificus
in the different
aliquots of the spiked homogenate ranged from
5.27 · 10
4 to 5.27 · 10
1 CFU/ml.
A slightly higher concentration of yellow colonies was
observed on VVM
agar than the estimated number of cells added
to each aliquot. The
counts of the pathogen were as expected when
the enumeration of
V. vulnificus cells was confirmed by colony
hybridization
with the probe (Table
4). There were
differences
between the total counts on TSA2 agar and those on VVM
agar. Slightly
higher counts on TSA2 agar might be due to the stressing
effect
of the selective medium.
In a recent study (
3), CPC agar showed higher detection and
recovery of
V. vulnificus from marine samples than PCR
approaches.
However, the percentage of confirmed
V. vulnificus cells on CPC
agar was quite low. On the other hand, CC
agar shows higher recoveries
and is less stressful than CPC agar for
V. vulnificus, probably
because of the absence of polymyxin
B in CC agar (
16). Here,
we show that VVM agar gives higher
recovery than CC agar. It is
interesting that VVM has the same
proportion of polymyxin B and
colistin methanesulfonate as mCPC agar
and gives better recoveries
than CC agar. The electrolytes
(MgCl
2·6H
2O and KCl), which stimulate
bacterial growth, or the different main source of nitrogen on
VVM could
explain such differences. Thus, VVM agar could be used
as a selective
medium in the standard protocol for the isolation
of
V. vulnificus. Such a protocol is used for the environmental
monitoring of
V. vulnificus. This is performed in two steps:
first,
an enrichment step in APW supplemented with polymyxin B or
colistin
(
16) or in a recently described selective broth
(
19); second,
inoculation of the enriched sample on
selective agar and usually
confirmation by specific immunoassays or DNA
hybridizations. In
this study, VVM agar and the V3VV probe showed their
usefulness
for differential detection of
V. vulnificus in
mixed bacterial
suspensions and spiked mussel samples. Their use in the
second
step of the standard protocol used to detect
V. vulnificus is
feasible. However, further studies with natural
environmental
samples should be performed to evaluate if the combined
use of
VVM agar and the specific probe V3VV could improve the standard
protocol for the environmental monitoring of
V. vulnificus
in
shellfish and estuarine
waters.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This study was supported by the program 1999SGR00023 of the
Generalitat de Catalunya.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Departament de
Microbiologia, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av.
Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Spain. Phone: 34 93 402 14 89. Fax: 34 93 411 05 92. E-mail: cerda{at}porthos.bio.ub.es.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alsina, M., and A. R. Blanch.
1994.
A set of keys for biochemical identification of environmental Vibrio species.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
76:79-85[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Amaro, C., and E. G. Biosca.
1996.
Vibrio vulnificus biotype 2, pathogenic for eels, is also an opportunistic pathogen for humans.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
62:1454-1457[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Arias, C. R.,
R. Aznar,
M. J. Pujalte, and E. Garay.
1998.
A comparison of strategies for the detection and recovery of Vibrio vulnificus from marine samples of the western Mediterranean coast.
Syst. Appl. Microbiol.
21:128-134[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Arias, C. R.,
E. Garay, and R. Aznar.
1995.
Nested PCR method for rapid and sensitive detection of Vibrio vulnificus in fish, sediments, and water.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
61:3476-3478[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Aznar, R.,
W. Ludwig,
R. I. Amann, and K. H. Schleifer.
1994.
Sequence determination of rRNA genes of pathogenic Vibrio species and whole-cell identification of Vibrio vulnificus with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
44:330-337[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Brauns, L. A., and J. D. Oliver.
1994.
Polymerase chain reaction of whole cell lysates for the detection of Vibrio vulnificus.
Food Biotechnol.
8:1-6.
|
| 7.
|
Brayton, P. R.,
P. A. West,
E. Russek, and R. R. Colwell.
1983.
New selective plating medium for isolation of Vibrio vulnificus biogroup 1.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
17:1039-1044[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Brosius, J.,
J. L. Palmer,
J. P. Kennedy, and H. F. Naler.
1978.
Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomal RNA gene from Escherichia coli.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
75:4801-4805[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Coleman, S. S.,
D. M. Melanson,
E. G. Biosca, and J. D. Oliver.
1996.
Detection of Vibrio vulnificus biotypes 1 and 2 in eels and oysters by PCR amplification.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
62:1378-1382[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Dalsgaard, A.,
N. Frimodt-Møller,
B. Bruun,
L. Høi, and J. L. Larsen.
1996.
Clinical manifestations and molecular epidemiology of Vibrio vulnificus infections in Denmark.
Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
15:227-232[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Dalsgaard, A.,
I. Dalsgaard,
L. Høi, and J. L. Larsen.
1996.
Comparison of a commercial biochemical kit and an oligonucleotide probe for identification of environmental isolates of Vibrio vulnificus.
Lett. Appl. Microbiol.
22:184-188[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
DePaola, A.,
M. L. Motes,
D. W. Cook,
J. Veazey,
W. E. Garthright, and R. Blodgett.
1997.
Evaluation of an alkaline phosphatase-labeled DNA probe for enumeration of Vibrio vulnificus in Gulf Coast oysters.
J. Microbiol. Methods
29:115-120[CrossRef].
|
| 13.
|
Devereux, J.,
P. Haeberli, and O. Smithies.
1984.
A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX.
Nucleic Acids Res.
12:387-395.
|
| 14.
|
Donovan, T. J., and P. van Netten.
1995.
Culture media for the isolation and enumeration of pathogenic Vibrio species in foods and environmental samples.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
26:77-91[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Farmer, J. J., III, and F. W. Hickman-Brenner.
1992.
The genera Vibrio and Photobacterium, p. 2952-3011.
In
A. Balows, H. G. Trüper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder, and K. H. Schleifer (ed.), The prokaryotes: a handbook on the biology of bacteria, 2nd ed., vol. III. Ecophysiology, isolation, identification, applications. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y.
|
| 16.
|
Høi, L.,
I. Dalsgaard, and A. Dalsgaard.
1998.
Improved isolation of Vibrio vulnificus from seawater and sediment with cellobiose-colistin agar.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:1721-1724[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Høi, L.,
J. L. Larsen,
I. Dalsgaard, and A. Dalsgaard.
1998.
Occurrence of Vibrio vulnificus biotypes in Danish marine environments.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:7-13[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Horré, R.,
G. Marklein, and K. P. Schaal.
1996.
Vibrio vulnificus, an emerging human pathogen.
Zentbl. Bakteriol.
284:273-284.
|
| 19.
|
Hsu, W. Y.,
C. I. Wei, and M. L. Tamplin.
1998.
Enhanced broth media for selective growth of Vibrio vulnificus.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:2701-2704[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Kaysner, C. A.,
M. L. Tamplin,
M. M. Wekell,
R. F. Stott, and K. G. Colburn.
1989.
Survival of Vibrio vulnificus in shellstock and shucked oysters (Crassostrea gigas and Crassostrea virginica) and effects of isolation medium on recovery.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
55:3072-3079[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Kitaura, T.,
S. Doke,
I. Azuma,
M. Imaida,
K. Miyano,
K. Harada, and E. Yabuuchi.
1983.
Halo production by sulfatase activity in V. vulnificus and V. cholerae O1 on a new selective sodium dodecyl sulfate-containing agar medium: a screening marker in environmental surveillance.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
17:205-209.
|
| 22.
|
Martínez-Picado, J.,
M. Alsina,
A. R. Blanch,
M. Cerdà, and J. Jofre.
1996.
Species-specific detection of Vibrio anguillarum in marine aquaculture environments by selective culture and DNA hybridization.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
62:443-449[Abstract].
|
| 23.
|
Massad, G., and J. D. Oliver.
1987.
New selective and differential medium for Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio vulnificus.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
53:2262-2264[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Miceli, G. A.,
W. D. Watkins, and S. R. Rippey.
1993.
Direct plating procedure for enumerating Vibrio vulnificus in oysters (Crassostrea virginica).
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
59:3519-3524[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Morris, J. G., Jr.,
A. C. Wright,
D. M. Roberts,
P. K. Wood,
L. M. Simpson, and J. D. Oliver.
1987.
Identification of environmental Vibrio vulnificus isolates with a DNA probe for the cytotoxin-hemolysin gene.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
53:193-195[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Needleman, S. B., and C. D. Wunsch.
1970.
A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins.
J. Mol. Biol.
48:443-453[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Nicholls, K. M.,
J. V. Lee, and T. J. Donovan.
1976.
An evaluation of a commercial thiosulfate citrate bile salt sucrose agar (TCBS).
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
41:265-269[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Oliver, J. D.
1981.
The pathogenicity and ecology of Vibrio vulnificus.
Mar. Technol. Soc. J.
15:45-52.
|
| 29.
|
Oliver, J. D.,
K. Guthrie,
J. Preyer,
A. C. Wright,
L. M. Simpson,
R. Siebling, and J. G. Morris.
1992.
Use of colistin-polymyxin B-cellobiose agar for isolation of Vibrio vulnificus from the environment.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
58:737-739[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Rippey, S. R.
1994.
Infectious diseases associated with molluscan shellfish consumption.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
7:419-425[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Sloan, E. M.,
C. J. Hagen,
G. A. Lancette,
J. T. Peeler, and J. N. Sofos.
1992.
Comparison of five selective enrichment broths and two selective agars for recovery of Vibrio vulnificus from oysters.
J. Food Prot.
55:356-359.
|
| 32.
|
Sun, Y., and J. D. Oliver.
1995.
Value of cellobiose-polymyxin B-colistin agar for isolation of Vibrio vulnificus from oysters.
J. Food Prot.
58:439-440.
|
| 33.
|
Tamplin, M. L.,
A. L. Martin,
A. D. Ruple,
D. W. Cook, and C. W. Kaspar.
1991.
Enzyme immunoassay for identification of Vibrio vulnificus in seawater, sediment, and oysters.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
57:1235-1240[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Vanoy, R. W.,
M. L. Tamplin, and J. R. Schwarz.
1992.
Ecology of Vibrio vulnificus in Galveston Bay oysters, suspended particulate matter, sediment and seawater: detection by monoclonal antibody-immunoassay-most probable number procedures.
J. Ind. Microbiol.
9:219-223.
|
| 35.
|
West, P. A.,
E. Russek,
P. R. Brayton, and R. R. Colwell.
1982.
Statistical evaluation of a quality control method for isolation of pathogenic Vibrio species on selected thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose agars.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
16:1110-1116[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Wright, A. C.,
R. T. Hill,
J. A. Johnson,
M. C. Roghman,
R. R. Colwell, and J. G. Morris.
1996.
Distribution of Vibrio vulnificus in Chesapeake Bay.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
62:717-724[Abstract].
|
| 37.
|
Wright, A. C.,
G. A. Miceli,
W. L. Landry,
J. B. Christy,
W. D. Watkins, and J. G. Morris, Jr.
1993.
Rapid identification of Vibrio vulnificus on nonselective media with an alkaline phosphatase-labeled oligonucleotide probe.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
59:541-546[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2000, p. 855-859, Vol. 66, No. 2
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Brown, R. N., Gulig, P. A.
(2008). Regulation of Fatty Acid Metabolism by FadR Is Essential for Vibrio vulnificus To Cause Infection of Mice. J. Bacteriol.
190: 7633-7644
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Adin, D. M., Visick, K. L., Stabb, E. V.
(2008). Identification of a Cellobiose Utilization Gene Cluster with Cryptic {beta}-Galactosidase Activity in Vibrio fischeri. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 4059-4069
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Warner, E., Oliver, J. D.
(2007). Refined Medium for Direct Isolation of Vibrio vulnificus from Oyster Tissue and Seawater. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
73: 3098-3100
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sanjuan, E., Amaro, C.
(2007). Multiplex PCR Assay for Detection of Vibrio vulnificus Biotype 2 and Simultaneous Discrimination of Serovar E Strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
73: 2029-2032
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Alcaide, E., Blasco, M.-D., Esteve, C.
(2005). Occurrence of Drug-Resistant Bacteria in Two European Eel Farms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 3348-3350
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sanjuan, E., Amaro, C.
(2004). Protocol for Specific Isolation of Virulent Strains of Vibrio vulnificus Serovar E (Biotype 2) from Environmental Samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
70: 7024-7032
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Thompson, F. L., Iida, T., Swings, J.
(2004). Biodiversity of Vibrios. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
68: 403-431
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vogan, C. L., Costa-Ramos, C., Rowley, A. F.
(2002). Shell disease syndrome in the edible crab, Cancer pagurus - isolation, characterization and pathogenicity of chitinolytic bacteria. Microbiology
148: 743-754
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Marco-Noales, E., Milan, M., Fouz, B., Sanjuan, E., Amaro, C.
(2001). Transmission to Eels, Portals of Entry, and Putative Reservoirs of Vibrio vulnificus Serovar E (Biotype 2). Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
67: 4717-4725
[Abstract]
[Full Text]