Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2000, p. 864-868, Vol. 66, No. 2
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Determination of Escherichia coli Contamination with
Chromocult Coliform Agar Showed a High Level of Discrimination
Efficiency for Differing Fecal Pollution Levels in Tropical Waters
of Kampala, Uganda
Dennis
Byamukama,1
Frank
Kansiime,2
Robert L.
Mach,3 and
Andreas H.
Farnleitner4,*
Department of Zoology1
and Institute of Environment and Natural
Resources,2 Makerere University, Kampala,
Uganda, and Institute of Biochemical Technology and
Microbiology, Technical University of Vienna, 1060 Vienna,3 and Institute of Water Quality,
Section Microbial Ecology, Federal Agency for Water Management,
1220 Vienna,4 Austria
Received 10 June 1999/Accepted 4 November 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Escherichia coli, total coliforms, fecal coliforms, and
sulfite-reducing anaerobic spore formers from different polluted sites in a tropical environment were determined in order to test for their
indication ability for fecal contamination. Quantification of E. coli contamination with Chromocult coliform agar proved to be
efficient and feasible for determining fecal pollutions in the
investigated area within 24 h. The other microbial parameters showed a lower ability to differentiate sites and cannot be recommended for monitoring fecal pollution in the studied tropical surface waters.
 |
TEXT |
As a means for assessing fecal
pollution in environmental freshwaters in temperate regions like Europe
and North America, the determination of fecal indicators, such as fecal
coliforms (FC) or Escherichia coli, is widely accepted
(25). In contrast, application of these monitoring
techniques in tropical countries has yielded questionable results, and
the indication value of such parameters is doubted (5, 6, 12, 13,
15, 16, 20, 22-24). There is some evidence that standard fecal
indicators (e.g., FC) may originate from sources other than enteric
ones, survive significantly longer in tropical waters than in temperate ones, or even become part of the aquatic microbial community (13, 25). However, comprehensive investigations which take into
account the indication value of microbial indicators for fecal
pollution in tropical regions are scarce (13).
Like many developing nations, Uganda faces a high population density
accompanied by a relatively poor infrastructure. Especially in the
urban centers, the available sanitary facilities cannot sustain the
population, leading to contamination of surface water sources with
fecal material. As waterborne diseases such as cholera and typhoid
fever have been rampant (18), there is need for appropriate,
cheap, and feasible methods of detecting fecal contamination. The aim
of this work was to analyze and compare the discrimination ability of
different internationally recommended microbial indicators for fecal
pollution on an existing contamination gradient (from highly polluted
waters to waters of minimal human impact) in the area of Kampala, Uganda.
Study area and sampling.
The main study area, the Nakivubo
channel, is a manmade stream that drains Kampala and its suburbs. It
discharges into Lake Victoria at the Inner Murchison Bay (Fig.
1). The channel receives raw sewage from
slums, industrial effluents, and discharge from a sewage treatment
plant and from a complex of slaughterhouses. The Nakivubo channel
passes through a swamp before discharging into the lake. Eight sampling
sites were selected (Fig. 1). Four sites were chosen along the channel.
Station S1, the source of the channel, receives domestic waste,
residential sewage, and discharge from Makerere Kivulu, a slum of the
capital. Station S2 is located downstream of the city center and is
influenced mainly by commercial, industrial, and residential
establishments. Station S5 is downstream of two main effluents, one
from the abattoirs which discharges a mixture of untreated animal waste
and water (S3) and the other from a sewage treatment plant with a
trickling filter mechanism (S4). Station S8 is located at a railway
crossing, after the Nakivubo channel has crossed the upper Nakivubo
swamp. The two other sites are a protected water spring (S7) and a site on the shores of Lake Victoria at Port Bell (S6). Six samples were
taken at each location from July to September 1998 (twice a month),
during a time of year when a mixture of rainy and dry patterns is
evident.
Chemophysical parameters.
Electrical conductivity (EC) and
temperature were measured in situ with an LF-96 calibrated at 25°C
(WTW, Vienna, Austria). Five days' biochemical oxygen demand (BOD),
pH, and total suspended solids (TSS) were determined in the laboratory
according to American Public Health Association standards
(2).
Bacteriological parameters.
All samples were collected in
sterile glass bottles, immediately placed into dark cooling boxes, and
processed within 6 h of collection. The most-probable-number (MPN)
technique (2), with five tubes per water sample dilution
(10
1 to 10
7), was used for total coliforms
(TCM), FC, and sulfite-reducing anaerobic spore formers (SASF) by using
lauryl sulfate broth, EC medium, and differential reinforced
clostridial medium broth (all media from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany),
respectively (2, 11). Bottles (10 ml) containing the media
and inverted Durham tubes (for TCM and FC) were inoculated with 1-ml
volumes of the respective dilutions. TCM bottles were incubated at
37°C in a dry incubator; FC bottles were incubated at 44°C in a
water bath. Gas and turbidity production within 48 h was
considered to be a positive response. For detection of SASF the
inoculated differential reinforced clostridial media were covered with
a paraffin oil layer (4 mm) and pasteurized for 25 min at 75°C,
followed by incubation at 37°C for 2 days. Bottles that turned black
due to sulfite reduction were considered to contain samples that were
positive for SASF (11). The surface plate technique was used
for simultaneous detection of total coliforms (TCC) and E. coli with Chromocult coliform agar (CCA) (1, 10, 19)
which was enriched with 5 mg of cefsulodin (Sigma, Vienna, Austria) per
ml. Portions (100 µl) of the respective sample dilutions
(10
1 to 10
4) were applied to plates
(triplicate plates for each dilution step) and incubated at 37°C for
24 h. Pink colonies resulting from salmon-galactoside cleavage by
-D-galactosidase were classified as TCC, whereas dark
blue colonies resulting from salmon-galactoside and X-glucuronide
cleavage by
-D-galactosidase and
-D-glucuronidase were classified as presumptive E. coli colonies. For samples of S6 and S7, 100-ml sample
enrichments were performed by means of membrane filtration with
cellulose nitrate filters (pore size, 0.45 µm; Sartorius, Vienna,
Austria). The membranes were placed on CCA plates and incubated as
described above.
Chemophysical sampling site characterization.
The sampling
sites showed distinct patterns of EC, TSS, and BOD values (Table
1), differing significantly from each
other (P < 0.001; by the Kruskal-Wallis test,
n = 3 × 8 × 6). In addition, a significant
correlation between EC, TSS, and BOD values was observed (Table
2). Temperature and pH values were
uniform for all sampling stations, except that the pH values of the
protected spring water site were lower, most likely due to
CO2 saturation (Table 1). The pronounced differences of EC,
TSS, and BOD values at the respective sampling sites correspond highly
to infrastructural conditions and to the various kinds of usage of the
water. As a consequence, sampling sites could be ranked in the
following sequence, with habitats showing a gradual decrease in the
level of anthropogenic influence: S3 and S4 (slaughterhouse and sewage treatment plant effluent, respectively) > S1 (channel
source) > S2 and S5 (main channel stations) > S8 (channel
station after swamp) > S7 and S8 (protected spring and Lake
Victoria shore site, respectively). This ranking was the basis for
testing the discrimination ability of selected microbial indicators for
fecal pollution.
Discrimination ability of fecal pollution indicators.
Microbial indicator concentrations observed at the different polluted
sites are given in Table 3. Although all
indicator concentrations correlated significantly with EC, TSS, and BOD values (Table 2), remarkable differences in the fecal pollution indicator discrimination potential between selected sampling sites could be detected. Pairwise comparisons of detectable and nondetectable differences between representative sampling sites or habitat types (i.e., pulled data sets from comparable sampling locations, e.g., channel stations) for the selected microbial parameters revealed in a
high discrimination ability for E. coli contamination as determined with CCA (Table 4). E. coli concentrations showed significant differences between 8 out
of the 10 pairs of stations or habitats, whereas TCC, TCM, FC, and SASF
showed significant differences for only six, four, three, and two
pairs, respectively. The high discrimination ability of E. coli concentrations as determined by CCA is further supported by
the fact that E. coli contamination could not be detected at
the least-influenced sampling station, S6, whereas the other indicators
were detected at all stations during the whole study (Table 3). These
results provide good evidence that the extent of E. coli
contamination as determined by CCA is highly efficient in
discriminating between waters influenced by different levels of
anthropogenic activity. This fact was further underlined by the
maximum-to-minimum ratios of the observed microbial indicator
concentrations (i.e., the highest observed value divided by the lowest
observed value of pulled data sets), showing ratios of 107
for E. coli, 106 for TCC, 106 for
FC, 105 for TCM, and 105 for SASF.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 4.
Discrimination potential of microbial indicators by
pairwise comparison of representative sampling sites and
habitat typesa
|
|
E. coli detection with CCA.
Recently, application
of defined substrate medium technology with particular selective growth
conditions and the simultaneous detection of
-D-galactosidase and
-D-glucuronidase
activity have become widespread tools for the detection of E. coli in water and wastewater (3, 4, 7, 21, 26). In
fact, CCA has proven to be efficient for E. coli detection
in temperate regions (1, 10, 14, 19). The results of this
study proved that CCA could be applied successfully to tropical waters
as well (i.e., in Kampala, Uganda). Using appropriate dilution steps of
various samples of polluted waters, presumptive E. coli
colonies could be readily counted on the CCA after 24 h of
incubation. Overgrowth of competitive microorganisms was not observed.
The surface plating technique could be successfully applied for
spreading respective dilutions of water samples on CCA, hence saving
expensive membrane filters and reducing costs dramatically. In
practice, E. coli determination with CCA took significantly
less processing time and was less prone to cross-contamination than MPN
methodology. In order to further characterize the presumptive E. coli colonies from CCA, indole testing was performed on 290 randomly selected presumptive E. coli colonies from CCA,
resulting in 281 indole-positive colonies. According to these results,
an error of 3% could be estimated, suggesting that reliable
simultaneous E. coli isolation and identification by CCA
could be carried out in tropical waters of this kind.
Sampling stations from moderately to highly polluted sites yielded
concentrations for
E. coli, as determined with CCA, that
were consistently higher than FC concentrations in EC medium.
In
contrast, low-impact sites such as S7, the protected spring
site, and
S6, the sampling site on Lake Victoria, yielded higher
values for FC.
These observations may be explained by the following:
CCA seems to
favor the growth of
E. coli at 37°C more effectively
than
EC medium does for FC. This hypothesis is strengthened by
the findings
of Mercado and Hazen (
17), who reported that values
obtained
by MPN were lower than those obtained by four different
membrane
filtration methods for FC isolation. In contrast, at
less influenced
and low-pollution sites, FC values were significantly
higher than
counts of
E. coli obtained with CCA; this was true
for the
spring site (S7), and in particular for the Lake Victoria
shore (S6),
where no
E. coli could be detected with CCA. This
could be
due either to the fact that no
E. coli cells were present
at
the Lake Victoria sampling site and the recorded FC were composed
of
bacteria other than
E. coli or to the fact that the high
values
were caused by false-positive FC, i.e., low specificity of
testing
with EC medium. Mercado and Hazen (
17) previously
suggested
that in tropical waters there would be more bacteria of types
other than
E. coli that would yield a positive FC reaction
for
MPN methods than in temperate waters. Since the ambient water
temperature in tropical waters is much higher than that in temperate
climates, more thermotolerant bacteria can be expected as background
flora. This is also supported by Evison and James (
9), who
reported a higher proportion of 44°C
E. coli II,
Citrobacter freundii II, and
Klebsiella aerogenes
I isolated from samples in Kenya
than from samples in the United
Kingdom. It is rather unlikely
that the use of CCA resulted in a
failure to detect
E. coli cells
that were members of the FC
fraction at the Lake Victoria station,
as CCA clearly proved more
efficient in isolating
E. coli in highly
polluted sites than
EC medium (Table
3).
In conclusion, the results of this study recommend the determination of
E. coli contamination with CCA for the detection of
fecal
pollution in the area of Kampala, Uganda. All other microbial
indicators were less efficient in detecting and discriminating
selected
tropical waters bearing diverse contamination, and therefore
cannot be
recommended for monitoring fecal pollution. The high
fecal indication
value revealed for
E. coli in this study is in
contradiction
to the results of former investigations carried
out in other tropical
environments. There,
E. coli concentrations
did not seem to
coincide with known sources of fecal pollution
(
13), and
furthermore,
E. coli could even be isolated from pristine
sites of a tropical rain forest (
22). However, it is
important
to note that there are major differences between Uganda and
other
tropical countries, especially the lower temperature range due
to
the high altitude of the country. For example, Oluwande et
al.
(
20) and Collazo et al. (
8) reported water
temperatures
of up to 32.0 and 33.4°C in Nigerian streams and Puerto
Rican
waters, respectively. In this study, a water temperature range
of
about 23 to 26°C was observed. Furthermore, there exist also
methodological differences, as previous investigations used detection
media which identified TCC or FC colonies as a first step and
then
deduced
E. coli concentrations from isolation and
identification
of representative colonies. In our study we used CCA for
direct
quantification of
E. coli CFU, leading to
statistically sound
numbers. The results of this study strongly call
for further evaluation
of our approach in different tropical regions,
especially in developing
countries.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This research was funded by a grant (612-01-96) from the Austrian
government awarded to Dennis Byamukama.
We thank the staff of the National Water and Sewerage Corporation
Central Laboratories, Kampala, Uganda, for their assistance. Many
thanks also to G. Winkler, C. Beiwl, L. Sebela, and G. Kavka for
helpful discussions, and to S. Grillenberger for proofreading the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of
Water Quality, Section Microbial Ecology, Federal Agency for Water
Management, Schiffmühlenstraße 120, 1220 Vienna, Austria. Phone:
0043/2630/30650. Fax: 0043/2630/363439. E-mail:
A.FARNLEITNER{at}aon.at.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alonso, J. L.,
K. Soriano,
I. Amoros, and M. A. Ferrus.
1998.
Quantitative determination of E. coli and fecal coliforms in water using a chromogenic medium.
J. Environ. Sci. Health
33:1229-1248.
|
| 2.
|
American Public Health Association.
1995.
Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th ed.
American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
|
| 3.
|
Brenner, K. P.,
C. C. Rankin,
Y. R. Roybal,
G. N. Stelma, Jr.,
P. V. Scarpino, and A. P. Dufour.
1993.
New medium for the simultaneous detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
59:3534-3544[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Brenner, K. P.,
C. C. Rankin,
M. Sivaganesan, and P. V. Scarpino.
1996.
Comparison of the recoveries of Escherichia coli and total coliforms from drinking water by the MI agar method and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-approved membrane filter method.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
62:203-208[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Burlingame, G. A.,
J. McElhaney, and W. O. Pipes.
1984.
Bacterial interference with coliform colony sheen production on membrane filters.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
47:56-60[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Carillo, M.,
E. Estrada, and T. C. Hazen.
1985.
Survival and enumeration of the fecal indicators Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Escherichia coli in a tropical rain forest watershed.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
50:468-476[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Clark, D. L.,
B. B. Milner,
M. H. Stewart,
R. L. Wolfe, and B. H. Olson.
1991.
Comparative study of commercial 4-methylumbelliferyl- -D-glucuronide preparations with the Standard Methods membrane filtration fecal coliform test for the detection of Escherichia coli in water samples.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
57:1528-1534[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Collazo, L. V.,
J. A. Shultz, and T. C. Hazen.
1987.
Survival of Candida albicans in tropical marine fresh waters.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
53:1762-1767[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Evison, L. M., and A. James.
1973.
A comparison of the distribution of intestinal bacteria in British and East African waters.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
36:109-118[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Frampton, E. W.,
L. Restaino, and N. Blaszko.
1988.
Evaluation of the -glucuronidase substrate 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl- -D-glucuronide (X-GLUC) in a 24 h direct plating method for Escherichia coli.
J. Food Prot.
51:402-404.
|
| 11.
|
Freame, B., and B. W. F. Fitzpatrick.
1972.
The use of differential reinforced clostridial medium for the isolation and enumeration of clostridia from food, p. 48-55.
In
D. A. Shapton, and R. G. Board (ed.), Isolation of anaerobes. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 12.
|
Fujioka, R. S., and O. T. Narikawa.
1982.
Effect of sunlight on the enumeration of fecal indicator bacteria under field conditions.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
44:395-401[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Hazen, T. C., and G. A. Toranzos.
1990.
Tropical source water, p. 32-53.
In
G. A. McFeters (ed.), Drinking water microbiology: progress and recent developments. Springer-Verlag KG, Berlin, Germany.
|
| 14.
|
Manafi, M., and W. Kneifel.
1989.
A combined chromogenic fluorogenic medium for the simultaneous detection of total coliforms and E. coli in water.
Zentbl. Hyg. Umweltmed.
189:225-234.
|
| 15.
|
McCambridge, J., and T. A. McMeekin.
1981.
Effect of solar radiation and predacious microorganisms on survival of fecal and other bacteria.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
41:1083-1087[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Means, E. G., and B. H. Olson.
1981.
Coliform inhibition by bacteriocin-like substances in drinking water distribution systems.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
42:506-512[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Mercado, J. S., and T. C. Hazen.
1987.
Comparison of four membrane filter methods for fecal coliform enumeration in tropical waters.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
53:2922-2928[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Ministry of Natural Resources Uganda.
1996.
State of the environment report for Uganda.
Ministry of Natural Resources Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
|
| 19.
|
Ogden, I. D.,
G. C. Brown,
S. Gallacher,
P. H. Garthwalle,
M. Gennari,
M. P. Gonzalez,
L. B. Jorgensen,
B. T. Lunestad,
M. Macrae,
M. C. Nunes,
A. C. Petersen,
J. T. Rosnes, and J. Vlingenthart.
1998.
An interlaboratory study to find an alternative to the MPN technique for enumerating Escherichia coli in shellfish.
J. Food Microbiol.
40:57-64[CrossRef].
|
| 20.
|
Oluwande, P. A.,
M. K. C. Sridhar,
A. O. Bammeke, and A. O. Okubadejo.
1983.
Pollution levels in some Nigerian streams.
Water Res.
17:957-963[CrossRef].
|
| 21.
|
Rice, E. W.,
M. J. Allen, and S. C. Edberg.
1990.
Efficacy of -glucuronidase assay for identification of Escherichia coli by the defined-substrate technology.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
56:1203-1205[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Rivera, S. C.,
T. C. Hazen, and G. A. Toranzos.
1988.
Isolation of fecal coliforms from pristine sites in a tropical rain forest.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
54:513-517[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Robertson, J. S.,
J. M. Croll,
A. James, and J. Gay.
1966.
Pollution of underground water from pea silage.
Mon. Bull. Minist. Health Public Health Lab. Serv. Directed Med. Res. Counc.
25:172.
|
| 24.
|
Roll, B. M., and R. S. Fujioka.
1997.
Sources of fecal indicator bacteria in a brackish, tropical stream and their impact on recreational water quality.
Water Sci. Technol.
35:179-186.
|
| 25.
|
Toranzos, G. A., and G. A. McFeters.
1997.
Detection of indicator microorganisms in environmental fresh waters, p. 184-194.
In
C. J. Hurst, G. R. Knudsen, M. J. McInerney, L. D. Stetzenbach, and M. V. Walter (ed.), Manual of environmental microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 26.
|
Venkateswaran, K.,
A. Murakoshi, and M. Satake.
1996.
Comparison of commercially available kits with standard methods for the detection of coliforms and Escherichia coli in foods.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
62:2236-2243[Abstract].
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2000, p. 864-868, Vol. 66, No. 2
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Byamukama, D., Mach, R. L., Kansiime, F., Manafi, M., Farnleitner, A. H.
(2005). Discrimination Efficacy of Fecal Pollution Detection in Different Aquatic Habitats of a High-Altitude Tropical Country, Using Presumptive Coliforms, Escherichia coli, and Clostridium perfringens Spores. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 65-71
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Isobe, K. O., Tarao, M., Chiem, N. H., Minh, L. Y., Takada, H.
(2004). Effect of Environmental Factors on the Relationship between Concentrations of Coprostanol and Fecal Indicator Bacteria in Tropical (Mekong Delta) and Temperate (Tokyo) Freshwaters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
70: 814-821
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
McLellan, S. L., Daniels, A. D., Salmore, A. K.
(2001). Clonal Populations of Thermotolerant Enterobacteriaceae in Recreational Water and Their Potential Interference with Fecal Escherichia coli Counts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
67: 4934-4938
[Abstract]
[Full Text]