Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2000, p. 1057-1061, Vol. 66, No. 3
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Flow Cytometry for Determination of the Efficacy of
Contact Lens Disinfecting Solutions against
Acanthamoeba spp.
Roya N.
Borazjani,
Lauren
L.
May,
Judith A.
Noble,
Simon V.
Avery, and
Donald G.
Ahearn*
Department of Biology, Georgia State
University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Received 2 August 1999/Accepted 10 December 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Flow cytometric analyses of cellular staining with fluorescent
viability dyes and direct microscopic observations of methylene blue
exclusion were compared for evaluation of the effects of a
chlorhexidine gluconate-based contact lens disinfectant solution and a
polyhexamethylene biguanide solution against cysts and trophozoites of
Acanthamoeba castellanii and Acanthamoeba
polyphaga. The flow cytometric procedure with propidium iodide
(used to stain dead cells) indicated that more than 90% of
trophozoites of both species (inocula of 105 to
106/ml) at 22°C lost their viability after 4 h of
exposure to chlorhexidine. When propidium iodide was used in
combination with fluorescein diacetate (for live cells), the apparent
number of propidium iodide-stained cells was reduced, but the relative
efficacies of the two biguanide solutions appeared unchanged from those
evident with the single dyes; the chlorhexidine solution was more
effective than the polyhexamethylene biguanide solution. Similar data
were obtained with the more cumbersome methylene blue exclusion
procedure. Flow cytometric analyses provided a statistically
reproducible and rapid procedure for determining the relative
antiamoebal efficacies of the disinfecting solutions.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
An average of 50% of contact lens
wearers have contaminating microorganisms in their contact lens cases
at some time during their use of lenses (16, 17).
Gram-negative bacteria in lens cases, particularly Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, present a risk for serious keratitis. Contamination of
lens care systems, in particular with gram-negative bacteria, seems to
be a prerequisite for the establishment of potentially infectious
populations of Acanthamoeba spp. (1, 15).
Compared to the incidence of contact lens-related bacterial keratitis,
amoebic keratitis is a rare infection, but its recalcitrance to
treatment and potential to cause blindness are a serious concern
(8, 10, 12). The incidence of amoebic keratitis has been
particularly centered among users of home-prepared saline solutions or
tap water (particularly if the water supply was from a roof storage
facility deficient in disinfectant) as a means of rinsing lenses
(9, 13). In the United States, the discontinuation of salt
tablets for home-prepared saline from the market in the mid-1980s
resulted in a decrease in the incidence of Acanthamoeba keratitis.
Acanthamoeba spp. are widespread in fresh and marine aqueous
environments, and they are common in moisture reservoirs in buildings. The genus is characterized by typically uninucleate trophozoites with
fine protoplasmic acanthopodia. This active motile stage feeds by
phagocytosis and pinocytosis and divides by binary fission. Trophozoites can undergo a transition to a double-walled cyst stage
within a few hours (1). Early cyst stages often are less resistant than mature cysts to adverse environmental conditions, and
mature cysts of a given strain may have varied resistance (1,
7). The relative susceptibilities of Acanthamoeba spp. to biguanide-type and other contact lens disinfectant solutions have
been determined from postexposure enumeration of surviving amoebae from
tracks or plaques in a bacterial lawn (3, 4) and by dye
exclusion procedures (3, 5, 14). No single procedure for in
vitro evaluation of antiamoebal compounds has been accepted, and
disadvantages in methods used for Acanthamoeba testing have
been presented (2).
Khunkitti et al. (6) determined the lethal effects of
chlorhexidine diacetate and polyhexamethylene biguanide
(PHMB) on Acanthamoeba castellanii by flow cytometry and
plaque assay procedures. Minimal lethal concentrations (12.5 µg/ml)
detected for trophozoites were generally the same by both procedures,
whereas minimal lethal concentrations (25 to 50 µg/ml) detected for
cysts were occasionally higher by the flow cytometry procedure. Herein
we compare the dye exclusion and flow cytometry procedures.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cultivation of amoebae.
A. castellanii (ATCC 30234)
and Acanthamoeba polyphaga (ATCC 30461) were obtained from
the American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Va. For preparation of
inocula, trophozoites and cysts were transferred to a peptone
(0.1%)-yeast extract (0.1%)-glucose (1.8%) (PYG) medium containing
penicillin G sulfate (400 U) and streptomycin sulfate (400 µg) with
incubation for 48 h. Axenic strains were maintained in 10 ml of
PYG medium at 25°C in 75-cm2 tissue culture flasks or in
250 ml of PYG in 500-ml Erlenmeyer flasks. The flasks were incubated on
a rotary shaker (150 rpm). Incubation times varied from 72 to 96 h
for production of trophozoites (>98%) and from 3 to 6 weeks for
development of cysts (70 to 97%). Trophozoites were harvested in the
exponential growth phase and washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS
[pH 7.4]; 8 g of NaCl, 0.2 g of KCl, 1.44 g of
Na2HPO4, and 0.24 g of
KH2PO4 per liter of distilled H2O).
Washed amoebae were suspended in PBS and adjusted to a concentration of
107 cells/ml as determined from cell counts performed in a
hemocytometer counting chamber (Hausser Scientific, Inc., Horsham,
Pa.). Cyst inocula were prepared from cultures incubated in flasks for
up to 6 weeks and were harvested as described above. Inocula with at
least 85% cysts were used in the comparative experiments. Washed trophozoites or cysts were suspended to appropriate concentrations (~106/ml) in the disinfectant solutions. All experiments
were conducted at least in triplicate.
Disinfection.
A disinfection solution for use with soft and
rigid gas-permeable contact lenses composed mainly of a borate-buffered
saline with 50 µg of chlorhexidine per ml (Flexcare; Alcon, Fort
Worth, Tex.) was compared with a borate-buffered saline solution
containing 0.5 µg of PHMB per ml. Flexcare was employed as a standard
positive solution. In our experience, this solution is one of the more active antiamoebal contact lens disinfection solutions, typically killing more than 90% of trophozoite inocula within 4 h. Our
borate-buffered PHMB solution (pH 7.2) did not represent the activities
of all current commercially available PHMB solutions for hydrogel
lenses, but it was selected because it provided a medium range of
activity (of such solutions available commercially) after 4 h at
25°C, i.e., treated-cell suspensions yielded recoverable cysts.
An inoculum of 0.01 ml of buffered saline containing 107
Acanthamoeba organisms/ml was added to the wells of
microplates (24-well, flat-bottom, sterile polystyrene microplates with
lid; Corning, Corning, N.Y.) containing 0.99 ml of disinfectant
solution. The suspension was mixed with a single aspiration step from a
1,000-µl pipettor. The microplates were held in static culture at
25°C for 4 h. (No glass containers or pipettes were used in this
protocol because of potential adsorption of biocide noted in
preliminary experiments.) In separate experiments, the tests were
conducted in polypropylene vials (sterile, 2-ml capacity, cryogenic
vials; Nalgene, Rochester, N.Y.). The amoeba suspensions in
disinfectant solutions for each test run were compared with the
inoculum suspended in PBS. Between 2 and 10% of the cells suspended in
PBS were found to lose viability over the 4-h period. PBS controls for
each test series were employed to normalize the data obtained with the
disinfectant solutions.
Flow cytometry.
The viability of trophozoites and cysts
exposed to disinfectants was assessed by flow cytometry by procedures
adapted from those of Khunkitti et al. (6). Suspensions of 1 ml containing exposed trophozoites or cysts were transferred from the
polypropylene vials to 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tubes. Cells were stained
either with fluorescein diacetate (FDA) (Molecular Probes, Eugene,
Oreg.) in combination with propidium iodide (PI) (Molecular Probes) or with PI alone. FDA and PI were added to the amoeba suspensions to give
final concentrations of 10 and 25 mg/liter, respectively. Flow
cytometric analyses were performed with a FACSCalibur
fluorescence-activated cell sorter system (Becton Dickinson,
Heidelberg, Germany). Illumination was from a 15-mW, 488-nm argon-ion
laser. Viable cells stained with FDA gave a green fluorescence with a
530/30 filter (FL1-H [height of fluorescence intensity]). Nonviable
cells stained with PI fluoresced red with a 585/42 filter (FL2-H).
Heat-killed cells (90°C for 20 min) that all fluoresced red with PI
stain served as a control for the staining procedure. The dyes were
used separately and simultaneously. Because of some overlap in the
fluorescence emissions of FDA and PI, the stains routinely were used
independently in the flow cytometric analyses. Suspensions containing
viable untreated amoebae served as controls. Control amoeba populations that excluded PI (viable cells) were used to select analysis gates in
FL2-H versus FSC-H (forward scattered light measure of cell size) dot
plots. The dot plots were also gated by forward scatter to eliminate
analysis of noise and smaller particles (<3 µm in diameter). Treated
amoebae were superimposed into the previously selected analysis gates,
and the percent viability based on the number of cells analyzed (at
least 10,000 amoebae) was determined after treatment in chlorhexidine
and PHMB. Setting of analysis gates (see figure legends for details),
data handling, manipulation, and presentation were performed with
CELLQuest software (Becton Dickinson).
Methylene blue exclusion.
After a 4-h incubation (the most
common recommended disinfection time for cold disinfection systems),
0.1 ml of the amoeba-disinfectant suspension was removed and stained
with 0.1 ml of 0.3% basic methylene blue. Unstained (viable) and
stained (nonviable) cells were enumerated in the counting chamber
within 10 min after stain addition. More than 100 amoebae were examined
in each of triplicate samples. The relative percent killing was
determined by comparison with triplicate amoeba suspensions in buffered
saline. The percentage of viable amoebae of the initial inoculum was
adjusted for mortality in PBS.
We used a low-speed centrifugation step (<3,000 × g)
during the methylene blue exclusion procedure prior to staining. The trophozoites tended to gather on the surfaces of culture flasks and
vials; with centrifugation, the trophozoites became spherical and more
dispersed. When an outlying number was obtained in the triplicate
counting of a given cell suspension in a cell counting chamber, we
examined an additional sample and also counted at least 100 cells
within 25 grids when numbers were less than 100 in the five standard grids.
 |
RESULTS |
The numbers of trophozoites stained with PI and methylene blue
after exposure in PBS to chlorhexidine and PHMB, normalized for loss of
viability in PBS, are presented in Table
1. The percent stained varied in repeat
experiments (±10%). In experiments with chlorhexidine, some
trophozoites lysed within the first few minutes after exposure to the
disinfectant (confirmed microscopically) and therefore were not
detected on the flow cytometric dot plots. The percent loss of
viability was calculated, in all cases, as the number of detected
viable cells divided by the total number of cells originally in the
sample analyzed (Fig. 1 and
2). Experiments showed that when amoeba
cells were stained with FDA and PI simultaneously, the number of cells
stained with PI (dead cells) was much lower than when only PI was used
(Fig. 3).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Loss of viability of A. castellanii and
A. polyphaga in disinfectant solutions containing
chlorhexidine and PHMB as determined by PI staining and methylene
blue exclusion
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Effect of chlorhexidine solution (50 µg/ml) on
trophozoites (A) and cysts (B) on A. polyphaga (2 × 106 cells/ml) stained with PI. FL2-H versus FSC-H dot plots
were used to discriminate viable (PI excluded; lower quadrant) from
dead (PI stained; upper quadrant) cells. The dot plots were gated by
forward scatter to eliminate analysis of noise and smaller particles
(<3 µm in diameter). Analysis gates were set with fluorescence from
control live (FL2-H, 540) and heat-killed (FL2-H, >540) amoebae.
|
|

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Effect of PHMB solution (0.5 µg/ml) on viability of
trophozoites (A) and cysts (B) of A. castellanii; cells were
stained with PI. Analysis gates were set as described previously.
|
|

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Effect of staining with PI alone (A) and PI and FDA
simultaneously (B) after exposure of A. polyphaga cysts to
PHMB for 4 h. Of 10,000 treated cells, 50% appeared viable after
staining with PI alone (A [lower quadrant]) and 80% appeared viable
after staining with PI and FDA (B [upper right quadrant]). The
analysis gates (from amoebae stained with PI and FDA) were set with
fluorescence from control live (FL1-H, 400; FL2-H, 520) and
heat-killed (FL1-H, <400; FL2-H, 520) cells. Analysis gates for
cells stained with PI were set as previously described.
|
|
The relative disinfection capacities of the model disinfectant
solutions, as indicated by flow cytometry with PI and the microscopy procedure with methylene blue exclusion, were similar (Table 1). Replicate samples of trophozoites of both species (106
cells) essentially were killed within 4 h by the chlorhexidine solution. In fact, most trophozoites in chlorhexidine were stained intensely within 30 s, whereas in the PHMB solution exposure, only
about 75% of the trophozoite preparation was intensely stained after
4 h. The staining procedures for the methylene blue determinations were all performed within 10 min, because various numbers of viable cells were stained by 15 min, and nearly all cells were stained by 20 min. Trophozoites were recovered from the disinfectant solutions upon
culture in PYG for 20 min, but not after 96 h following a 4-h
exposure to the chlorhexidine. Amoebae were recovered in PYG after a
4-h exposure to the PHMB solution. The recovery steps included transfer
to lawns of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and inoculation of
PYG broth (data not shown). Occasional cyst preparations stained mainly
as dead cells, and the nonstained cysts lost viability with incubation
in PBS and were not recoverable after 4 h. These sensitive cyst
preparations were excluded from the data in Table 1. A gradual lysis of
trophozoites or clumping occasionally was observed microscopically,
more often in the presence of PHMB than with chlorhexidine. This
gradual lysis phenomenon and the observation that the presence of PHMB
(during the 4-h exposures) tended to delay the uptake of methylene blue
resulted in occasional outlying data for numbers of live and dead cells.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The flow cytometry procedure and the methylene blue exclusion
procedure in repeat tests with the same preparations of inocula gave
comparable data on the relative efficacies of two disinfectant solutions, but the actual numbers killed, particularly for cysts, varied. When extensive lysis of trophozoites and precysts occurred after exposure to the disinfectants, insufficient numbers of cells were
available for transfer to the cell counting chamber by the methylene
blue procedure, and accuracy was reduced when the counting step was
extended to the full 10-min period. The lysis events varied with the
inocula. In contrast, flow cytometric analysis provided a rapid and
quantitative evaluation of efficacy based on 104 individual
cell counts within 3 min. Moreover, clumps of trophozoites and cysts
that occasionally formed in the disinfectant solutions (an episodic
obstacle for the methylene blue method) were dispersed. This dispersal
most probably resulted from passage of the cells through the
hydrodynamically focused sample core of the flow cytometer. This type
of phenomenon was observed with several preparations of inocula
analyzed with a Coulter counter (data not shown). The numbers of viable
trophozoites and cysts detected after exposure to disinfectants
typically were greater by the flow cytometric procedure than by the
methylene blue procedure. Khunkitti et al. (6) had similar
results with comparisons of flow cytometry (employing FDA and PI
simultaneously) and a plaque assay. They proposed that dying cells
retain their ability to hydrolyze fluorescein diacetate.
Khunkitti et al. (6) found minimal lethal concentrations of
chlorhexidine diacetate and PHMB of 12.5 µg/ml for initial inocula of
106 trophozoites/ml and 25 to 50 µg of each inhibitor per
ml for 106 cysts of A. castellanii per ml. The
actual numbers of recoverable trophozoites and cysts in the inocula
preparations were closer to 104/ml. The higher values (50 µg/ml) for cysts were obtained for both inhibitors by the flow
cytometric procedure. Khunkitti et al. (7) reported that
different encystment stages (pre-excystment cyst, pre-encystment
trophozoite, and mature cysts) showed different sensitivities to these
inhibitors. The biocidal values cited above for trophozoites and cysts
with chlorhexidine diacetate and PHMB are similar to those found by a
variety of procedures (including different contact times) by Hay et al.
(5), Burger et al. (3), and Tirado-Angel et al.
(15). Values in the latter paper are taken from their Table
1 (15). (Values in the text of their report are listed
incorrectly as milligrams per milliliter.) All of the above values for
PHMB exceed the 0.5-µg/ml concentration (a concentration at the lower
range used in current commercial systems) used in this study. The
chlorhexidine and PHMB formulations were both borate buffered and
included emulsifiers. Borate formulations and various emulsifiers may
potentiate the antimicrobial activity of biguanides in commercial
preparations (3, 6, 11).
Our current interpretation of the data from the literature and our
investigation suggest that relative efficacies of disinfectant solutions against Acanthamoeba are obtainable by a variety
of methods, including flow cytometric analyses. The obvious advantages of the use of flow cytometric procedures over the exclusion of methylene blue and culture procedures were the speed with which results
were obtained and avoidance of the microscopic counting procedure.
Potential problems or miscalculations because of lysis were more
quickly evaluated by flow cytometry. The stains used in both procedures
were time and concentration based, but the 10-min staining period with
methylene blue was less discerning than the shorter staining period in
flow cytometric analyses. With both methods (and with others given in
the literature), there is the possibility that unstained amoebae were
nonrecoverable by the culture techniques used. Our data indicate the
relative efficacies of disinfectants against a given inoculum. A major question in all studies of susceptibilities of cysts to biocides is
variation within the cyst population and potentially reduced resistance
of cysts induced from an axenic culture with MgCl2. More
definitive data on physiology and regulation of trophozoite-cyst transition and excystment will be needed to validate a standardized quantitative method for the evaluation of disinfection efficacies. For
the present, we recommend that contact lens solutions be compared for
efficacy against cysts by using a chlorhexidine-borate control formulation similar to that studied herein. At least a 1-log reduction in viability of cysts of A. castellanii (104 to
105/ml) should be obtained with this solution. When lesser
values are obtained, the cyst preparation should be considered unacceptable.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Biology, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 4010, Atlanta, GA
30302-4010. Phone: (404) 651-3110. Fax: (404) 651-2509.
Present address: Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY 14603-0450.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ahearn, D. G., and M. M. Gabriel.
1997.
Contact lenses, disinfectants, and Acanthamoeba keratitis.
Adv. Appl. Microbiol.
43:35-56[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Buck, S. L., and R. A. Rosenthall.
1996.
A quantitative method to evaluate neutralizer toxicity against Acanthamoeba castellanii.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
62:3521-3526[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Burger, R. M.,
R. J. Franco, and K. Drlica.
1994.
Killing acanthamoebae with polyaminopropyl biguanide: quantitation and kinetics.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:886-888[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Davies, D. J. G.,
Y. Anthony,
B. J. Meakin,
S. Kilvington, and C. B. Anger.
1990.
Evaluation of the anti-acanthamoebal activity of five contact lens disinfectants.
Int. Contact Lens Clin.
17:14-20[CrossRef].
|
| 5.
|
Hay, J.,
C. M. Kirkness,
D. V. Seal, and P. Wright.
1994.
Drug resistance and Acanthamoeba keratitis: the quest for alternative antiprotozoal chemotherapy.
Eye
8:555-563.
|
| 6.
|
Khunkitti, W.,
S. V. Avery,
D. Lloyd,
J. R. Furr, and A. D. Russell.
1997.
Effects of biocides on Acanthamoeba castellanii as measured by flow cytometry and plaque assay.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
40:227-233[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Khunkitti, W.,
D. Lloyd,
J. R. Furr, and A. D. Russell.
1998.
Acanthamoeba castellanii: growth, encystment, excystment and biocide susceptibility.
J. Infect.
36:43-48[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Kilvington, S., and D. G. White.
1994.
Acanthamoeba: biology, ecology, and human disease.
Rev. Med. Microbiol.
5:12-20.
|
| 9.
|
Kirn, T. F.
1987.
As the number of contact lens users increases, research seeks to determine risk factors and how best to prevent potential eye infections.
JAMA
258:17-18[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Ledee, D. R.,
J. Hay,
T. J. Byers,
D. V. Seal, and C. M. Kirkness.
1996.
Acanthamoeba griffini. Molecular characterization of a new corneal pathogen.
Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
37:544-550[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Meisler, D. M.,
I. H. Ludwig, and I. Rutherford.
1991.
Acanthamoeba and disinfection of soft contact lenses.
Rev. Infect. Dis.
13:390-391.
|
| 12.
|
Modi, P. A.,
W. Gresh, and K. Shih.
1995.
Antimicrobial efficacy of two commercial rgp contact lens care systems.
CLAO J.
21:242-246[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Moore, M. B.,
J. Ubelaker, and R. Silvany.
1985.
Scanning electron microscopy of Acanthamoeba castellanii: adherence to surfaces of new and used contact lenses and to human corneal button epithelium.
Rev. Infect. Dis.
13:423-424.
|
| 14.
|
Talamo, J. D., and D. S. Larkin.
1993.
Bilateral Acanthamoeba keratitis and gas-permeable contact lenses.
Am. J. Ophthalmol.
116:651[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Tirado-Angel, J.,
M. M. Gabriel,
L. A. Wilson, and D. G. Ahearn.
1996.
Effects of polyhexamethylene biguanide and chlorhexidine on four species of Acanthamoeba in vitro.
Curr. Eye Res.
15:225-228[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Ubelaker, J. E.
1991.
Acanthamoeba spp.: opportunistic pathogens.
Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc.
110:289-299[CrossRef].
|
| 17.
|
Wilson, L. A.,
A. D. Sawant,
R. B. Simmons, and D. G. Ahearn.
1990.
Microbial contamination of contact lens storage cases and solutions.
Am. J. Ophthalmol.
110:193-198[Medline].
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2000, p. 1057-1061, Vol. 66, No. 3
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
McBride, J., Ingram, P. R., Henriquez, F. L., Roberts, C. W.
(2005). Development of Colorimetric Microtiter Plate Assay for Assessment of Antimicrobials against Acanthamoeba. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 629-634
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Greub, G., Raoult, D.
(2004). Microorganisms Resistant to Free-Living Amoebae. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
17: 413-433
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hughes, R., Heaselgrave, W., Kilvington, S.
(2003). Acanthamoeba polyphaga Strain Age and Method of Cyst Production Influence the Observed Efficacy of Therapeutic Agents and Contact Lens Disinfectants. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 3080-3084
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Noble, J. A., Ahearn, D. G., Avery, S. V., Crow, S. A. Jr.
(2002). Phagocytosis Affects Biguanide Sensitivity of Acanthamoeba spp.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
46: 2069-2076
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Greub, G., Raoult, D.
(2002). Crescent Bodies of Parachlamydia acanthamoeba and Its Life Cycle within Acanthamoeba polyphaga: an Electron Micrograph Study. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68: 3076-3084
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pougnard, C., Catala, P., Drocourt, J.-L., Legastelois, S., Pernin, P., Pringuez, E., Lebaron, P.
(2002). Rapid Detection and Enumeration of Naegleria fowleri in Surface Waters by Solid-Phase Cytometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68: 3102-3107
[Abstract]
[Full Text]