Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2000, p. 995-1000, Vol. 66, No. 3
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40546-0215
Received 30 August 1999/Accepted 12 December 1999
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus is a gram-positive
thermophile that produces considerable amounts of ethanol from
soluble sugars and polymeric substrates, including starch. Growth on
maltose, a product of starch hydrolysis, was associated with the
production of a prominent membrane-associated protein that had an
apparent molecular weight of 43,800 and was not detected in cells grown on xylose or glucose. Filter-binding assays revealed that cell membranes bound maltose with high affinity. Metabolic labeling of
T. ethanolicus maltose-grown cells with
[14C]palmitic acid showed that this protein was
posttranslationally acylated. A maltose-binding protein was
purified by using an amylose resin affinity column, and the binding
constant was 270 nM. Since maltase activity was found only in the
cytosol of fractionated cells and unlabeled glucose did not compete
with radiolabeled maltose for uptake in whole cells, it appeared that
maltose was transported intact. In whole-cell transport assays, the
affinity for maltose was approximately 40 nM. Maltotriose and
-trehalose competitively inhibited maltose uptake in transport
assays, whereas glucose, cellobiose, and a range of disaccharides
had little effect. Based on these results, it appears that T. ethanolicus possesses a high-affinity, ABC type transport system
that is specific for maltose, maltotriose, and
-trehalose.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus is a gram-positive anaerobic thermophile (11) that produces considerable amounts of ethanol from a wide range of polymeric and soluble carbohydrates (15, 24, 25). The physiology of T. ethanolicus type strain JW200 and strain 39E has been studied in some detail, and the high specific rate of ethanol production makes this species an attractive candidate for use in bioconversion processes (7-9). Starch is a potentially useful substrate for biomass conversion because of its availability and relatively low cost (26). The physiology (24) and enzymology (7) of starch breakdown in T. ethanolicus have been studied previously. However, there are still many gaps in our knowledge concerning fundamental processes, such as substrate transport. T. ethanolicus grows more slowly on maltose, cellobiose, or starch than on glucose (16, 23, 25) and apparently lacks disaccharide phosphorylase activities possessed by other thermophiles (16); it was therefore hypothesized that in this organism a glucose permease is responsible for uptake of monosaccharides derived from extracellularly degraded maltose and starch (7). However, there has been no systematic comparison of the substrate transport systems of T. ethanolicus cultures grown on glucose, maltose, or starch, and an alternative hypothesis is that the differences in growth rates observed are due to discrete sugar transport systems for mono- and disaccharides.
Maltose transport systems in mesophilic bacteria have been widely
studied (2), and several systems in thermophiles have been
characterized to different degrees (12, 19, 27). The thermophilic transporters that have been examined in thermophiles are
binding-protein-dependent systems, which constitute a subfamily within
the ABC transporter superfamily (5). Each of these systems is composed of a periplasmic or membrane-associated binding protein that transfers the substrate to integral membrane components which mediate ATP-dependent uptake. Substrate specificity is mediated in
large measure by the binding protein (2). Since little
information concerning sugar transport mechanisms in T. ethanolicus is available, we decided to determine whether T. ethanolicus possesses a discrete uptake system for maltose. In
this paper we describe biochemical characterization of a
discrete maltose/maltotriose-binding protein and an associated
transport system that recognizes
-linked oligomers in T. ethanolicus.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell growth. T. ethanolicus 39E (= ATCC 33323) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, Md.) and was grown in a basal medium as previously described (4) at 70°C with a carbon source supplied at a concentration of 4 g/liter unless otherwise noted. Cell growth was measured spectrophometrically at 600 nm.
Analyses. Maltose and glucose concentrations in culture medium were determined enzymatically as previously described (13). The protein contents of samples were determined by the method of Lowry et al. (14) after the samples were boiled in 0.1 N NaOH for 20 min. Bovine serum albumin (catalog no. A4503; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.) was used as the standard. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) was performed by standard procedures (10).
Whole-cell transport assays.
Cultures (10 ml) were harvested
anaerobically by centrifugation (10,000 × g, 5 min,
25°C) during mid-exponential growth and were washed twice with
anaerobically prepared 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0) containing 10 mM MgCl2. The cells were resuspended in the same buffer to
a protein concentration of approximately 6 µg/ml. Individual lots of
cells (100 µl) were prewarmed by incubating them at 70°C for 1 min,
and sugar uptake was initiated by adding radiolabeled
[14C]maltose (360 mCi/mmol). Uptake was terminated after
5, 10, and 15 s by diluting the cells with 2 ml of cold 100 mM
LiCl and immediately filtering the preparations through
0.45-µm-pore-size nitrocellulose membrane filters. The filters were
dried at 105°C for 20 min, and radioactivity was determined by liquid
scintillation counting (Econo-Safe; RPI Corp., Mount Prospect, Ill.).
All uptake values were calculated after subtraction of the value for a
control reaction that was immediately terminated after the radioisotope
was added. Preliminary experiments established that uptake was linear
for 10 s when radiolabeled maltose was provided at concentrations ranging from 2.5 to 100 nM and that the adherence of radiolabeled maltose to nitrocellulose filters in the absence of cells was negligible. Uptake values were transformed by using a Lineweaver-Burk double-reciprocal plot to calculate the apparent transport affinity (Km) and Vmax for maltose
transport. Competition studies were performed by providing radiolabeled
maltose at concentrations of 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 200 nM and
measuring the initial rates of uptake in the presence of each of the
following unlabeled sugars at concentrations between 40 and 200 nM:
-trehalose, maltotriose, maltotetraose, and maltopentaose. The
apparent inhibition constant (KI) was calculated
for each unlabeled saccharide from a plot of
(Km/Vmax)×(1 + I/KI) versus I (where I is the
unlabeled sugar concentration).
Enzyme assays. Maltase activity was measured in a discontinuous fashion by using the same fractions that were used for partial purification of the binding protein. Each initial reaction mixture contained approximately 20 µg of protein, 50 mM piperazine-N,N'-bis-2(ethanesulfonic acid) (PIPES) (pH 6.8), and 20 mM maltose. The reaction mixture (1 ml) was incubated at 70°C for 2 min, and samples (250 µl) were removed at various times. The glucose concentrations in the samples were then determined by determining NADPH formation in an end point spectrophotometric assay (340 nm) at 37°C; each assay mixture contained 50 mM PIPES (pH 6.8), 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ATP, 1 mM NADP, 5 U of hexokinase (EC 2.7.1.1), and 5 U of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.49) (13). The control reaction mixtures lacked substrate or crude extract. Since maltase activity was not detected in the culture supernatant of cells growing on maltose, the extracellular protein present in the supernatant of an 80-ml culture was concentrated. Approximately 100 µg of protein was precipitated with a saturated ammonium sulfate solution at 4°C for 1 h, pelleted by centrifugation (32,000 × g, 20 min, 4°C), and then resuspended in 100 µl of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). The sample was then dialyzed overnight against 5 liters of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) at 4°C before the assay was performed.
Purification of binding protein.
Cells (5 liters) were
harvested by centrifugation (10,000 × g, 20 min,
4°C) during late-exponential growth (optical density at 600 nm
[OD600], 0.6), washed twice with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5),
resuspended in the same buffer to an OD600 of 50, and then frozen at
80°C. Cells prepared and stored in this manner retained binding activity for at least 6 months (data not shown). A 2-ml sample
of concentrated cells (approximately 30 mg of protein) was thawed and
passed twice through a chilled French pressure cell (1,200 kg/cm2). Whole cells and cellular debris were removed
by centrifugation (32,000 × g, 30 min, 4°C), which
resulted in a crude extract fraction.
-glucoside. The membranes were extracted by gentle agitation for 75 min at 4°C. The resulting mixture was centrifuged (105,000 × g, 60 min, 4°C), and the
supernatant fraction containing the solubilized binding protein was
retained and used for the assay.
The maltose-binding protein was purified by performing affinity
chromatography with an amylose resin column (New England Biolabs, Beverly, Mass.). The column (15 ml of resin) was prepared,
chromatographed, and regenerated as recommended by the manufacturer.
All steps were carried out at 4°C. Our initial attempts to purify the
maltose-binding protein from the membrane fractions were unsuccessful
(data not shown). However, preliminary experiments revealed that the
maltose-binding activity present in crude extracts bound to the amylose
resin. Therefore, freshly prepared crude extract (170 mg of protein) was loaded onto the affinity column, and proteins that did not bind to
the amylose resin were eluted with 12 column volumes of 20 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 7.4) containing 200 mM NaCl and 1 mM EDTA. Maltose-binding activity
was then eluted with the same buffer supplemented with 10 mM maltose.
The fractions that contained the most binding protein (as estimated by
SDS-PAGE) were pooled and concentrated by using a centrifugal filter
(10,000-molecular-weight cutoff; MSI, Westboro, Mass.). The
concentrated fraction was dialyzed to reduce the maltose concentration
to less than 10 nM prior to reapplication to the amylose affinity
resin. The fractions containing the most binding activity after elution
were again pooled, concentrated, and dialyzed.
Maltose-binding assay. The maltose-binding activities in various cell fractions were determined essentially as described previously (17). Crude extract, cytosol, or membrane fractions (100 µl) and pooled, concentrated, and dialyzed fractions obtained from the affinity chromatography procedure (2 µl) were prewarmed in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) for 30 s at 70°C before radiolabeled D-[14C]maltose (final concentration, 0.69 µM; 360 mCi/mmol) was added. The reaction mixtures were then placed in an ice bath and diluted with 2 ml of ice-cold 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) saturated with ammonium sulfate. After 10 min of incubation, samples were passed through a 0.45-µm-pore-size nitrocellulose filter and washed with an additional 2 ml of the Tris-ammonium sulfate solution. The filters were then dried for 20 min at 105°C, and the radioactivity in each sample was determined by scintillation counting. Preliminary experiments revealed that there was linearity with respect to protein concentration, and there was negligible nonspecific adsorption (<5%) of radiolabeled maltose to filters in the absence of protein.
Detergent-extracted membrane samples were used to investigate the effect of temperature and pH on maltose binding. In these experiments, reaction mixtures were incubated at the different temperatures or pH values for 5 min before radiolabeled sugar was added. Sugar competition studies were performed with the extracted membranes by adding a 50-fold excess (34.5 µM) of unlabeled sugar to the reaction mixture 5 s before radiolabeled maltose was added. Maltose and maltooligomers were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. The purity of the maltooligomers was sufficiently high that any contaminating maltose did not significantly affect the competition experiments.Equilibrium dialysis. An assay based on the retention of ligand by binding protein (20) was used to determine the binding affinity (Kd) of the maltose-binding protein. Purified binding protein from the affinity chromatography experiments was diluted with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) to a concentration of 0.67 µM. A 100-µl sample of the resulting solution was pipetted into a 10,000-molecular-weight cutoff Slide-a-Lyzer Mini dialysis unit (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, Ill.). An identical control unit contained only 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). Both units were equilibrated for 16 h at 4°C against a 40-ml Tris-HCl solution containing [14C]maltose (594 mCi/mmol) at a final concentration of 198 nM. The dialysis units were then removed and placed in separate flasks containing 1 liter of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) that was gently stirred. Samples (10 µl) were removed from both units over time, and radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting. The half-life of retention of ligand in the unit containing binding protein was theoretically greater by a factor of 1 + ([P]/Kd) (where [P] is the molar concentration of ligand) than the half-life of retention of ligand in the unit that did not contain any binding protein; Kd was expressed as a nanomolar concentration (20).
Labeling with [1-14C]palmitate. Ten milliliters of medium containing either 0.4% maltose or glucose was inoculated to obtain an initial OD600 of approximately 0.1. The cultures were grown to an OD600 of 0.25, and then 10 µCi of [1-14C]palmitic acid (52 mCi/mmol) was added. Growth was allowed to continue until the OD600 reached 0.65. Cells were then harvested by centrifugation (10,000 × g, 20 min, 4°C), washed twice with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and resuspended with 100 µl of lysis solution containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 2% SDS, and 0.1% 2-mercaptoethanol. Samples were incubated at 70°C for 15 min and centrifuged at 15,000 × g, 20 min, 25°C), and a sample (approximately 15 µg of protein in 25 µl) of each resulting supernatant was loaded onto a 10% polyacrylamide SDS-PAGE gel. Proteins were visualized by staining the gels with Coomassie brilliant blue and were fixed with 10% methanol before the gels were dried. Radiolabeled proteins were visualized by autoradiography after the gels were exposed to Kodak XOMAT LS film for 2 weeks.
Protein sequence analysis. The proteins present in detergent-extracted membranes from maltose-grown cells were resolved by SDS-PAGE and then were electroblotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.). Protein alkylation, enzymatic cleavage, peptide purification, and peptide sequence analysis were performed at the Macromolecular Structure Analysis Facility at the University of Kentucky. Briefly, the putative maltose-binding protein (approximately 40 µg on a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane) was alkylated and then cleaved with 0.1 µg of endopeptidase LysC (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.) at 37°C for 18 h. The resulting peptides were separated by reverse-phase chromatography by using a model 1050 high-performance liquid chromatograph (Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, Calif.) equipped with a Vydec column (Vydec, Hesperia, Calif.). Absorbing peaks (214 nm) were collected manually, and one peak was used for amino acid sequence analysis. A peptide sequence analysis was performed with a model 477A peptide sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Maltase activity in cell fractions. Maltase activity (3.1 nmol/min/mg of protein) was detected in crude extracts derived from maltose-grown cells, but activity was not detected in glucose-grown cell extracts. After further fractionation, it was established that maltase activity (3.9 nmol/min/mg of protein) was present only in the cytosol. Activity was not detected in either the membrane samples or the extracellular culture fluid of maltose-grown cells. In addition, there was little glucose accumulation (<20 µM) in the extracellular culture fluid of T. ethanolicus logarithmic- or stationary-phase cells supplied with 11 mM maltose. Together, these data suggested that rather than maltose being cleaved to glucose by extracellular enzymes and then monomers being internalized via a glucose permease, as had been hypothesized previously (7), the disaccharide was actually transported intact across the cell membrane prior to intracellular cleavage.
Maltose transport by whole cells.
Given the lack of
extracellular maltase activity, we hypothesized that T. ethanolicus possesses a transport system(s) that is specific for
maltose uptake. To test this hypothesis, mid-logarithmic-growth-phase cells grown on maltose were used in uptake studies. These cells transported the disaccharide (Fig. 1),
and no effect on radiolabeled maltose uptake was observed if a 50-fold
excess of unlabeled glucose, galactose, sucrose, or lactose (data
not shown) was added to the incubation mixture. In addition, there was
virtually no maltose uptake in glucose-grown cells. Since 15 min of
incubation of cells at 70°C prior to transport abolished 95% of the
original activity, uptake appeared to be an energy-dependent process
and not simply the result of maltose binding to the external surfaces
of the cells.
|
-trehalose strongly
inhibited maltose uptake in a competitive manner (data not shown), and
the KI values for these sugars were 48 and 51 nM, respectively. In contrast, the kinetic studies revealed mixed competition for maltotetraose and maltopentaose, whose
KI values were 470 and 1,650 nM, respectively.
This is the first quantitative data which indicates the relative
affinities of maltose, malto-oligomers, and
-trehalose for a maltose
transport system in a thermophile.
|
Purification of maltose-binding activity.
In general,
bacterial and archaeal high-affinity transport systems, such as the
maltose transport system in T. ethanolicus, achieve their
high affinity in large measure due to binding proteins which are
specific for the substrate and either are present in the periplasm
or are associated with the cell surface. Therefore, we performed
experiments to determine whether T. ethanolicus possesses a
D-maltose-binding protein as one of the components of its
high-affinity maltose transport system. Radiolabeled maltose was bound
by crude extracts of cells grown on the disaccharide (Table
1), and this activity did not appear to
be caused by nonspecific binding since extracts obtained from
glucose-grown cells bound less than 5% as much maltose as extracts
obtained from maltose-grown cells. In addition, maltose-binding
activity was not detected in membrane fractions of cultures grown on
glucose, xylose, sucrose, cellobiose, lactose, or mannitol (data not
shown).
|
-glucoside, and the
detergent-extracted material appeared to be enriched for a protein with
an apparent molecular weight of 43,800 (Fig.
3, lane 4). However, the specific
activity for maltose binding was only sixfold greater than the specific
activity of the crude extract (Table 1).
|
Metabolic labeling and peptide sequencing. Since T. ethanolicus has a gram-positive cell envelope and possesses a membrane-bound lipoprotein for xylose binding (4), it seemed reasonable to hypothesize that the putative maltose-binding protein is also a lipoprotein. Therefore, T. ethanolicus cells grown on either maltose or glucose were incubated with [14C]palmitate to label any lipoproteins. The results indicated that the prominent 43.8-kDa membrane-associated protein in maltose-grown cells (Fig. 3, lane 4) incorporated radiolabeled palmitate (Fig. 3, lane 5) and that this labeled protein was not present in membrane samples from glucose-grown cells (data not shown). Thus, the putative maltose-binding protein appeared to be lipidated and located on the T. ethanolicus cell surface.
Since the 43.8-kDa protein appeared in the membrane fraction of maltose-grown cells and since its presence was correlated with maltose-binding activity, it was partially sequenced to determine its identity. Since this protein was apparently lipidated as shown by the metabolic labeling experiment, most likely at the N terminus (21), it was probably resistant to N-terminal Edman degradation. Therefore, peptides were derived by cleavage with LysC and were subsequently purified by high-performance liquid chromatography. One of the resulting products was sequenced (Fig. 4), but no matches were found when this peptide was compared to sequences in the GenBank database by using the BLAST algorithim (1). This was not entirely unexpected since the query sequence was only 17 amino acids long and the maltose-binding proteins currently available from the GenBank database exhibit considerable sequence diversity (data not shown). However, when the peptide was individually aligned with several thermophilic maltose-binding proteins using ClustalW (22), we found that it exhibited 41% sequence identity and 82% similarity (Fig. 4) with a portion of the C-terminal region of Thermococcus litoralis MalE (gi2828820 [6]) and was less similar to maltose-binding proteins from Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurigenes (gi565382 [19]) and Thermotoga maritima (gi1850900 [12]) (data not shown). In fact, the C-terminal portion of the T. litoralis
-trehalose/maltose-binding protein exhibited a higher level of identity to the T. ethanolicus peptide sequence than to any
other maltose-binding protein. This sequence comparison provided
further evidence that the 43.8-kDa protein was probably a
maltose-binding protein.
|
Biochemical characteristics.
Equilibrium dialysis
(20) was used to determine the binding affinity of the
purified T. ethanolicus maltose-binding protein. In this
assay, the rates at which a radiolabeled substrate left a dialysis
membrane in the presence and in the absence of binding protein were
compared (Fig. 5), and the
Kd for maltose was 270 nM.
|
-trehalose decreased binding of labeled maltose
by more than 85%. These data are consistent with results
obtained in the whole-cell uptake studies. Maltose binding was
also decreased by adding excess maltotetraose and maltopentaose.
However, binding activity was largely unaffected by unlabeled glucose,
cellobiose, or
-trehalose.
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The elucidation of mechanisms by which thermophilic bacteria utilize maltose during starch degradation is of interest with regard to the use of these microorganisms in production of vendable chemicals (15, 26). The amylosaccharide metabolism pathways in T. ethanolicus 39E (formerly Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum) were investigated in detail by Hyun et al. (7). These authors concluded that maltose and other soluble dextrins derived from starch are hydrolyzed to glucose by an array of extracellular enzymes before the monosaccharide is taken up via a glucose permease. This hypothesis apparently was confirmed by the observation that glucose accumulated in the extracellular culture fluid of cells grown in the presence of high concentrations of maltose or starch. However, since all enzyme activities in the study of Hyun et al. were measured by using crude cell extracts, the cellular locations of the activities could not be definitively established. In addition, there was no attempt to determine whether T. ethanolicus actually possessed only a glucose transport system or whether there were also mechanisms for transporting oligomers that arise from starch degradation.
In contrast to the previous studies of maltose utilization by T. ethanolicus, we found no evidence that glucose accumulates in the extracellular culture fluid of cells growing on maltose. Additionally, maltase activity was not detected either in membranes of maltose-grown T. ethanolicus cells or in the extracellular culture fluid; maltase activity was found only in the cytosolic fraction. Finally, radiolabeled maltose uptake was specifically associated with maltose-grown cells, and uptake was not affected by glucose. Therefore, our results support the hypothesis that maltose is transported intact across the cell membrane prior to cleavage by cytoplasmic maltase activity. The observations described above show that a thorough analysis of both the biochemistry and the genetics of maltose uptake is particularly important in developing a more complete understanding of the starch bioconversion process in T. ethanolicus.
As appears to be the case in T. ethanolicus, maltose
transport is mediated by binding-protein-dependent systems in the
thermophiles T. litoralis (27) and T. thermosulfurigenes (19). The affinity of the T. ethanolicus transport system for maltose is very similar to the
affinity of the maltose-binding protein of T. litoralis (40 and 20 nM, respectively). In addition,
-trehalose is a common substrate for each transporter in these two organisms. Accumulation of
-trehalose has been mentioned as a possible osmoprotective mechanism
when an organism encounters high salt conditions (6). However, in other respects, the T. ethanolicus system
appears to be different from the systems in other thermophiles. Unlike the T. ethanolicus system, maltotriose does not appear to be
a substrate for binding or transport by the T. litoralis
MalEFG transport system (6, 27). Maltotriose has been
reported to be a possible substrate for the T. thermosulfurigenes maltose transporter, but no kinetic data was
presented (19). Maltose was also transported with a higher
affinity in T. ethanolicus than in T. thermosulfurigenes (40 nM versus 7 µM). In contrast to the
kinetics of transport of other sugars in T. thermosulfurigenes (19), Thermoanaerobacter
thermosulfuricus (3), and T. ethanolicus (4), the kinetics of maltose transport in T. ethanolicus are monophasic. The substrate specificity of the
T. ethanolicus maltose transport system appears to be more
similar to the substrate specificities of mesophilic systems
exemplified by Escherichia coli, in which the
maltose-binding protein binds both maltose and maltotriose with similar
affinities, albeit in the micromolar range (2). This is the
first study in which the relative affinities of substrates for a
maltose transport system in a thermophile were quantified.
Since the Km of whole-cell transport was 40 nM,
it was somewhat surprising that the binding constant of the
purified protein was 270 nM. However, an eightfold difference between
whole-cell transport affinity and the binding constant of T. litoralis MalE was noted by Horlacher et al. (6). This
difference was attributed to the nature of the interaction of the
binding protein with the membrane components of the maltose transport
system (6). The 43.8-kDa membrane protein specifically
associated with maltose-grown cells undergoes fatty acyl modification
in the presence of radiolabeled palmitate, and a peptide derived from
the protein was found to have a sequence very similar to the sequence
of a portion of the C-terminal region of the T. litoralis
-trehalose/maltose-binding protein (6).
Together, our results provide presumptive evidence that the maltose-binding protein in T. ethanolicus is covalently attached to the cell membrane, as are other binding proteins of gram-positive organisms that have been characterized, including binding proteins of T. ethanolicus (4, 18, 20). Maltose-binding activity in T. ethanolicus was remarkably insensitive to changes in temperature. In contrast, in T. litoralis there was no significant maltose-binding activity at room temperature (6). Future crystallographic studies should provide interesting comparative data for the active sites and overall structures of maltose-binding proteins from mesophilic and thermophilic organisms.
Our description of maltose transport and a binding protein in T. ethanolicus is the first detailed characterization of a maltose/maltotriose transport system in a thermophile, and we found that T. ethanolicus possesses a functional ATP-dependent transport system for maltose. Short, degenerate oligonucleotide probes obtained from reverse translation of the known sequence of the T. ethanolicus maltose-binding protein and degenerate PCR primers based on alignment of the conserved sequences of MalG, one of the membrane-bound components of the maltose ABC transport system (2, 5), are currently being used to clone and analyze the components that encode the maltose ABC transporter in T. ethanolicus.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by Hatch project KY007007. C.R.J. was supported by a University of Kentucky Presidential Graduate Fellowship.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: 212 W. P. Garrigus Building, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0215. Phone: (606) 257-7554. Fax: (606) 257-5318. E-mail: strobel{at}pop.uky.edu.
Published with the approval of the Director of the Kentucky
Agricultural Experiment Station as Journal article no. 00-07-7.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Altschul, S. F.,
T. L. Madden,
A. A. Schaffer,
J. Zhang,
Z. Zhang,
W. Miller, and D. J. Lipman.
1997.
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.
Nucleic Acids Res.
25:3389-3402 |
| 2. |
Boos, W., and H. Shuman.
1998.
Maltose/maltodextrin system of Escherichia coli: transport, metabolism and regulation.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62:204-229 |
| 3. | Cook, G. M., P. H. Janssen, J. B. Russell, and H. W. Morgan. 1994. Dual mechanisms of xylose uptake in the thermophilic bacterium Thermoanaerobacter thermosulfuricus. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 116:257-262[CrossRef]. |
| 4. |
Erbeznik, M.,
K. A. Dawson,
H. J. Strobel, and C. R. Jones.
1998.
D-Xylose-binding protein, XylF, from Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus 39E: cloning, molecular analysis, and expression of structural gene.
J. Bacteriol.
180:3570-3577 |
| 5. | Higgins, C. F. 1992. ABC transporters: from microorganisms to man. Annu. Rev. Cell. Biol. 8:67-113[CrossRef]. |
| 6. |
Horlacher, R.,
K. B. Xavier,
S. Santos,
J. DiRuggiero,
M. Kossman, and W. Boos.
1998.
Archaeal binding protein-dependent ABC transporter: molecular and biochemical analysis of the trehalose/maltose transport system of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus litoralis.
J. Bacteriol.
180:680-689 |
| 7. |
Hyun, H. H.,
G.-J. Shen, and J. G. Zeikus.
1985.
Differential amylosaccharide metabolism of Clostridium thermosulfurigenes and Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum.
J. Bacteriol.
164:1153-1161 |
| 8. |
Lacis, L. S., and H. G. Lawford.
1985.
Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus in a comparison of the growth efficiencies of thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobes.
J. Bacteriol.
163:1275-1278 |
| 9. |
Lacis, L. S., and H. G. Lawford.
1992.
Strain selection in carbon-limited chemostats affects reproducibility of Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus fermentations.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
58:761-764 |
| 10. | Laemelli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680-685[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. | Lee, Y.-E., M. K. Jain, C. Lee, S. E. Lowe, and J. G. Zeikus. 1993. Taxonomic distinction of saccharolytic thermophilic anaerobes: description of Thermoanaerobacterium xylanolyticum gen. nov., sp. nov., and Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum gen. nov., sp. nov.; reclassification of Thermoanaerobium brockii, Clostridium thermosulfurigenes, and Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum E100-69 as Thermoanaerobacter brockii comb. nov., Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurigenes comb. nov., and Thermoanaerobacter thermohydrosulfuricus comb. nov., respectively; and transfer of Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum 39E to Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 43:41-51. |
| 12. |
Liebl, W.,
I. Stemplinger, and P. Ruile.
1997.
Properties and gene structure of the Thermotoga maritima alpha-amylase AmyA, a putative lipoprotein of a hyperthermophilic bacterium.
J. Bacteriol.
179:941-948 |
| 13. | Lou, J., K. A. Dawson, and H. J. Strobel. 1997. Glycogen biosynthesis via UDP-glucose in the ruminal bacterium Prevotella bryantii B14. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:4355-4359[Abstract]. |
| 14. |
Lowry, O. H.,
N. J. Rosebrough,
A. L. Farr, and R. J. Randall.
1951.
Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.
J. Biol. Chem.
193:265-275 |
| 15. | Lynd, L. R. 1989. Production of ethanol from lignocellulosic materials using thermophilic bacteria: critical evaluation of potential and review. Adv. Biochem. Eng. 38:1-52. |
| 16. |
Ng, T. K., and J. G. Zeikus.
1982.
Differential metabolism of cellobiose and glucose by Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum.
J. Bacteriol.
150:1391-1399 |
| 17. | Richarme, G., and A. Kepes. 1983. Study of binding protein-ligand interactions by ammonium sulfate-assisted adsorption on cellulose ester filters. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 742:16-24[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. |
Russell, R. R.,
J. Aduse-Opoku,
I. C. Sutcliffe,
L. Tao, and J. J. Ferretti.
1992.
A binding protein-dependent transport system in Streptococcus mutans responsible for multiple sugar metabolism.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:4631-4637 |
| 19. |
Sahm, K.,
M. Matuschek,
H. Muller,
W. J. Mitchell, and H. Bahl.
1996.
Molecular analysis of the amy gene locus of Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurigenes EM1 encoding starch-degrading enzymes and a binding protein-dependent maltose transport system.
J. Bacteriol.
178:1039-1046 |
| 20. |
Silhavy, T. J.,
W. Boos,
S. Szmelcman, and M. Schwartz.
1975.
On the significance of retention of ligand by protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
72:2120-2124 |
| 21. |
Sutcliffe, I. C., and R. R. B. Russell.
1995.
Lipoproteins of gram-positive bacteria.
J. Bacteriol.
177:1123-1128 |
| 22. |
Thompson, J. D.,
D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson.
1994.
ClustalW: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:4673-4680 |
| 23. | Wiegel, J. 1980. Formation of ethanol by bacteria. A pledge for the use of extreme thermophilic bacteria in industrial ethanol fermentation processes. Experientia 36:1434-1446[CrossRef]. |
| 24. | Wiegel, J., L. H. Carriera, C. P. Mothershed, and L. G. Ljungdahl. 1983. Production of ethanol from biopolymers by anaerobic, thermophilic and extreme thermophilic bacteria. II. Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus JW200 and its mutants in batch cultures and resting cell experiments. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 13:193-205. |
| 25. | Wiegel, J., and L. G. Ljungdahl. 1981. Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus gen. nov., spec. nov., a new, extreme thermophilic, anaerobic bacterium. Arch. Microbiol. 128:343-348[CrossRef]. |
| 26. | Wyman, C. E., and B. J. Goodman. 1993. Biotechnology for production of fuels, chemicals, and materials from biomass. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 39:41-59. |
| 27. |
Xavier, K. B.,
L. O. Martins,
R. Peist,
M. Kossmann,
W. Boos, and H. Santos.
1996.
High-affinity maltose/trehalose transport system in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus litoralis.
J. Bacteriol.
178:4773-4777 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Eukaryot. Cell | All ASM Journals |
|---|