Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1622-1628, Vol. 66, No. 4
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Inactivation of a Novel Gene Produces a Phenotypic Variant Cell
and Affects the Symbiotic Behavior of Xenorhabdus
nematophilus
Antonia
Volgyi,1,2
Andras
Fodor,2 and
Steven
Forst1,*
Department of Biological Sciences, University
of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201,1
and Department of Genetics, Eotvos Lorand University,
Budapest, Hungary2
Received 19 October 1999/Accepted 24 January 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Xenorhabdus nematophilus is an insect pathogen that
lives in a symbiotic association with a specific entomopathogenic
nematode. During prolonged culturing, variant cells arise that are
deficient in numerous properties. To understand the genetic mechanism
underlying variant cell formation, a transposon mutagenesis
approach was taken. Three phenotypically similar variant strains of
X. nematophilus, each of which contained a single
transposon insertion, were isolated. The insertions occurred at
different locations in the chromosome. The variant strain, ANV2, was
further characterized. It was deficient in several properties,
including the ability to produce antibiotics and the
stationary-phase-induced outer membrane protein, OpnB. Unlike wild-type
cells, ANV2 produced lecithinase. The emergence of ANV2 from the
nematode host was delayed relative to the emergence of the parental
strain. The transposon in ANV2 had inserted in a gene designated
var1, which encodes a novel protein composed of 121 amino acid residues. Complementation analysis confirmed that
the pleiotropic phenotype of the ANV2 strain was produced by
inactivation of var1. Other variant strains were not
complemented by var1. These results indicate that
inactivation of a single gene was sufficient to promote variant
cell formation in X. nematophilus and that disruption of
genetic loci other than var1 can result in the same
pleiotropic phenotype.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Xenorhabdus nematophilus
is harbored as a symbiont in an intestinal vesicle of the infective
juvenile stage of the entomopathogenic nematode, Steinernema
carpocapsae (19, 20, 24, 25, 31, 35, 36). The bacteria
are carried into a susceptible insect larva by the nematode and
are subsequently released into the insect hemolymph, where
they participate in the killing of the insect host (3, 4, 11,
17). X. nematophilus proliferates within the hemolymph
and eventually enters stationary phase. Under stationary-phase conditions, the bacterium produces numerous products that play roles in
providing a nutrient base for the developing nematodes (25, 42,
45). During the final stages of nematode development, the
bacteria and nematode reassociate, and the symbiotic pair leaves the
insect cadaver in search of a new host (4, 25, 36). The
symbiotic association presumably protects the bacterium so that it can
exist outside of the insect host (3, 11).
The X. nematophilus cells obtained from the infective
juvenile nematode are referred to as primary or phase I cells
(1, 8-10, 12, 13, 43, 48). The primary cells of all
strains of X. nematophilus studied to date
possess the following characteristics: they are motile, are able to
bind dye, can produce antibiotics, hemolysins, proteases, and crystal
proteins, can stimulate hemagglutination, can elaborate fimbriae on
agar surfaces, and are able to synthesize the outer membrane protein,
OpnB, during post-exponential-phase growth (25, 26, 27, 28, 34,
44). These properties will be referred to as primary-specific
traits. Other properties, such as lecithinase and lipase production,
are more variable between strains. During prolonged culturing of the
bacteria, variant cells arise spontaneously at a variable frequency.
The variant cells have been called secondary or phase II cells (8,
9, 12, 13). In the secondary cells, the primary-specific traits
mentioned above are either absent or greatly reduced. In some strains,
lipase and lecithinase activity are increased in the secondary cells (8, 12). The membranes of the variant secondary forms are less fluid than their respective primary forms (21). The
formation of secondary cells occurs in all species of
Xenorhabdus (8) and also occurs in the closely
related Photorhabdus spp. (24). Low osmolarity in
Photorhabdus luminescens (32) and microaerophilic conditions in X. nematophilus (9, 25) have been
shown to enhance formation of the secondary cells. Although the
biological role of the secondary cells remains unsolved, this form has
been shown to grow faster than the primary cells after experiencing starvation conditions (41). It was suggested that the
secondary cells may be better adapted to life as a free-living organism.
The primary and secondary cells are equally pathogenic towards larvae
of the greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella (17, 25,
31, 46). The secondary cells of Xenorhabdus support growth and development of the nematodes in vitro (18, 46). In contrast, they are defective in their ability to support growth of
the nematode in the insect (1). These findings suggest that the products missing in the secondary cells are not essential for
virulence but are required for normal in vivo growth of the nematode. A
major difference between the secondary cells of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus is that the latter do not support in vitro
growth of their symbiotic partner, the Heterorhabditidae
nematodes (18).
The genetic mechanism underlying the formation of the secondary cell
type is not known. DNA rearrangement (5) and loss of
plasmids (33) do not appear to play a role in this process. In Photorhabdus, both posttranscriptional (25,
30) and posttranslational (16, 47) mechanisms have
been proposed to be involved in the loss of primary-specific traits.
Since numerous properties are altered in the secondary cells, it is
conceivable that inactivation of a putative global regulatory gene
could result in the coordinate loss of the primary-specific products.
The question arises whether a unique genetic locus controls variant
cell formation. Alternatively, since secondary cells form under
prolonged incubation conditions, it is possible that the accumulation
of multiple mutations is necessary for the formation of the variant
form. In the present study, a transposon mutagenesis approach was taken
to address these questions.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains, plasmids, media, and growth conditions.
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are shown in Table
1. X. nematophilus strain
AN6/I (ATCC 19061/I) was maintained on Luria broth (LB) containing 50 µg of ampicillin per ml, 0.0025% bromothymol blue (BTB), and 0.004%
triphenyl-tetrazonium chloride (LBTA) (26, 34). ANV1, ANV2,
and ANV4 were maintained on LB containing 30 µg of kanamycin per ml.
The rifampicin-resistant strain AN6/I was maintained on LB containing
100 µg of rifampicin per ml. Escherichia coli S17-1
(pir) was used to conjugally transfer plasmids to X. nematophilus (40). X. nematophilus strains
were grown at 30°C, and E. coli was grown at 37°C.
Transposon mutagenesis.
The mini-Tn10 transposon
carried on pLOF-Kmr was introduced into X. nematophilus by conjugal transfer. Cultures used for transposon mutagenesis were grown to logarithmic phase, were centrifuged for 10 min at room temperature, and were resuspended in 0.6 ml of LB. One
hundred microliters of E. coli 17-1/pLOF-Kmr and
400 µl of AN6/I were mixed and placed on the surface of an LB plate
containing 0.1 mM isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and were incubated for 12 to 14 h at 30°C. Bacteria were resuspended in 1.5 ml of LB, were serially diluted, and were plated on
LBTA (26) containing 30 µg of kanamycin per ml and 100 µg of rifampicin per ml. The kanamycin-resistant red colonies were screened for several in vitro phenotypes.
In vitro biochemical assays.
Motility on soft agar, outer
membrane proteins, crystal proteins, antibiotic production, hemolysis,
and egg yolk lecithinase reaction were analyzed as described previously
(46).
Fimbria production and hemagglutination.
Fimbria production
was examined by electron microscopy as described by Brehelin et al.
(13). For the hemagglutination assay, cultures from nutrient
broth agar plates incubated at 30°C for 3 days were used
(34). Cells were serially diluted in Grace's medium (25 µl). Twenty-five microliters of sheep blood (4% in phosphate-buffered saline) was added to the cells, and the mixture was
shaken gently to mix. The result was recorded after 2 h of incubation at room temperature.
Initial growth of bacteria released from the nematode.
Infective dauer juveniles raised on a lawn of either AN6 or ANV2 were
harvested from water traps. There was no detectable difference in the
yields of nematodes grown on the respective strains. The bacteria were
subsequently surface sterilized by washing in sterile 0.9% NaCl,
followed by brief vortexing in a mixture of 10% Clorox and 0.9% NaCl,
and were subsequently washed three times with sterile 0.9% NaCl. The
effectiveness of the sterilization procedure in removing bacteria from
the nematode surface was assessed by using the BacLight vital stain
(Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, Oreg.). Bacteria were not detected on
the surface of the sterile nematodes. Five hundred nematodes were
inoculated into 5 ml of either LB (wild-type strain) or LB containing
30 µg of kanamycin per ml (mutant strains). The nematodes were
incubated at 28°C, and the bacterial growth was monitored by
turbidity by using a Klett meter. Each experimental condition was
performed in triplicate. The released bacteria were plated on LBTA
containing either 50 µg of ampicillin per ml (wild-type strain) or 30 µg of kanamycin per ml (mutant strains). X. nematophilus
cultures with plasmids were grown and plated on LBTA containing 10 µg
of gentamicin per ml. The experiment was repeated three times with
nearly identical results.
Natural infection of Manduca sexta.
Fourth-instar
M. sexta larvae were naturally infected with 50 surface-sterilized dauer juveniles per caterpillar. The nematodes were
raised on either the wild-type strain, secondary strains, mutant
strains, or mutant strains carrying plasmids, as described above.
Nematodes were placed on sterile filter paper soaked in 0.9% NaCl
solution prior to infection of the caterpillars. The growth of the
M. sexta larvae was monitored by weight gain. The time at
which 50% of the insects had died (LT50) was determined by
monitoring mortality by lack of movement and loss of body turgor. The
pathogenicity experiments were carried out three times for each
experimental condition (26).
Southern hybridization.
Southern hybridization was carried
out as previously described (38). Briefly, DNA separated on
a 1% agarose gel run in Tris-borate-EDTA buffer was transferred onto a
nylon membrane by capillary transfer and was hybridized with
32P-labeled probes under stringent conditions (65°C).
After hybridization, blots were washed at high stringency (65°C,
0.1× SSC [1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate], 0.1%
sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]) (44).
Cloning var1 and construction of
var1-orf2 plasmids.
Attempts to clone the 6.8-kb
EcoRI fragment containing the inactivated var1 of
ANV2 were unsuccessful (6, 38). To clone the inactivated
var1, we took advantage of the single HindIII site that exists in the Kmr cassette. The chromosome of
ANV2 was digested with HindIII and EcoRI, and
the resulting fragments were cloned into pGEM3Z (Promega). Following
transformation of E. coli, colonies containing the kanamycin resistance cassette were detected by colony hybridization. The 1.5-kb
NotI fragment of pLOFKmr was used as the probe.
The radiolabeled probe was hybridized to the filter at 65°C. Blots
were washed at 65°C in a solution containing 0.1× SSC and 0.1%
SDS. One positive clone containing a 1.2-kb flanking region adjacent to
the kanamycin resistance cassette (pG52) was analyzed by sequencing. To
clone the full-length EcoRI fragment that contained the
wild-type var1, an EcoRI library of the AN6/1 was
created in Lambda ZAPII EcoRI (Stratagene). Plaque hybridization was performed with nylon filters (MagnaGraph). The radiolabeled probe containing the 5' region of var1 (1.2-kb
EcoRI/NotI fragment of pG52) was used for plaque
hybridization. After hybridization, blots were washed at 65°C with a
solution containing 0.5× SSC and 0.5% SDS. The identified
positive lambda clones were converted into plasmid (pBK-CMV) with the
in vivo excision protocol, described by Stratagene, resulting in pBK9
(9.7 kb). A 5.2-kb insert was cut out from pBK9 with BamHI
and XbaI and was subcloned into pJQ200KS, resulting in pJV9
(10.1 kb). In order to delete the open reading frames (ORFs) downstream
of the ybhE-like gene, we used EcoRV, which has
three restriction sites (see Fig. 4). The pBluescript vector (pBK9)
containing the 5.2-kb wild-type fragment from X. nematophilus was digested with EcoRV, and the 8.7-kb
var1-containing fragment was isolated from the gel. The new
construction (pBK10, 8.7 kb in size) was digested with XbaI
and SalI to clone var1 into pJQ200KS, resulting
in pJV10 (9.1 kb in size). To construct pJV12, pBK9 was digested with
Csp45I and ClaI. The larger (8.2-kb) fragment was
isolated from the gel and religated (pBK12). The insert was cut out
with XbaI and SalI and was cloned into identical restriction sites of pJQ200KS.
Mobilization of the plasmids and complementation.
pG52 was
transformed into SB221 as previously described (22). The
plasmids pBK10, pBK12, pJV9, pJV10, and pJV12 were electroporated into
S17-1 in disposable microelectroporation chambers (Life Technologies) as described in the manufacturer's procedure. The plasmids pJV9, pJV10, and pJV12 were conjugated into ANV2.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The sequences reported
herein have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession no.
AF191556.
 |
RESULTS |
Transposon mutagenesis.
The genetic mechanism by which
secondary cells of X. nematophilus are formed is not known.
To determine whether inactivation of a single gene could produce the
pleiotropic phenotype associated with the secondary cell, a transposon
mutagenesis approach was taken. The strain AN6, which is equivalent to
the type strain ATCC 19061 (Table 1), was mutagenized by using a
mini-Tn10 carrying a kanamycin resistance gene. Exconjugants
were selected for kanamycin resistance and simultaneously screened for
lack of BTB binding. Out of 2,600 transposon mutant strains isolated,
50 lacked the ability to bind BTB. These strains were subsequently
tested for numerous phenotypic properties associated with the secondary
cell (Table 2). Eight mutant strains
which displayed the secondary cell phenotype were isolated. Southern
hybridization and restriction enzyme analysis showed that each of the
eight strains contained a single transposon insertion and that the
chromosomal position of the insertion was different in the individual
strains.
During the course of this study, we found that three of the eight
mutant strains did not revert during storage at

80°C or
during
storage on agar plates. In contrast, several phenotypic
characteristics
reverted to the wild-type state in the remaining
five strains. The
phenotypes of the three stable strains, ANV1,
ANV2, and ANV4, were
similar but not identical. They differed
in the amount of
lecithinase, lipase, and the stationary-phase-induced
outer membrane
protein (OpnS) produced. ANV1 and ANV4 produced
higher levels of
lecithinase (Table
3) and lipase (data
not shown)
than ANV2. In addition, OpnS production in ANV2 (Fig.
1, lane
2) and ANV1 (data not
shown) was elevated while ANV4 (data not
shown) produced
wild-type levels of this protein. Finally, ANV2
and ANV4
retained a long rod shape under stationary-phase conditions
while ANV1
exhibited a shorter rod shape (Table
3). ANV2 was
chosen for further
study.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Outer membrane proteins of strains grown under
stationary-phase conditions in LB. Lane 1, AN6; lane 2, ANV2; lane 3, ANV2 with pJV9; lane 4, ANV2 with pJV12; lane 5, ANV2 with pJV10.
|
|
In vitro characterization of ANV2.
The growth rate of ANV2 at
30°C in different growth media was identical to that of the parent
cell. ANV2 did not produce antibiotics, crystal proteins, or OpnB
(Table 2). These products have been previously shown to be
induced during the post-exponential-growth phase (23, 24, 25,
42). ANV2 also possessed dramatically reduced levels of fimbriae,
was unable to stimulate hemagglutination, lacked hemolytic activity,
and did not swarm on agar plates. In contrast, ANV2 was as motile in
broth culture as the parent strain and continued to be motile in
stationary phase, while motility of the parent was reduced. In this
regard, ANV2 and the secondary form of 19061 (19061/II) differed from
secondary cells characterized previously in that the latter were shown
to be nonmotile in liquid culture (Table 3).
Certain products were made at higher levels in ANV2 than in the parent
strain. The production of lecithinase was increased
in ANV2 and was not
detectable in the parent cells (Table
2).
In other strains of
X. nematophilus, lecithinase activity was
detected in the parent
strain and was reduced in the secondary
strains (Table
3). ANV2 also
produced a higher level of OpnS
(Fig.
1, lane 2) than did the parent
strain (lane 1). Overall,
the phenotype of ANV2 closely resembled that
of 19061/II (Table
2). However, ANV2 produced more OpnS and retained
its long rod
shape under stationary-phase conditions while 19061/II
became
shorter in stationary
phase.
In vivo characterization of ANV2.
To assess the pathogenic
properties of ANV2, approximately 300 bacterial cells were injected
into either fourth- or fifth-instar M. sexta. The
LT50s of the injected animals were determined. The LT50 was 24 h when the bacteria were injected into
fourth-instar caterpillars and was 27 h when cells were injected
into fifth-instar M. sexta. These values were identical to
those found for the parent strain. These findings indicated that ANV2
was fully pathogenic towards the larval insect host and that the
properties missing in the variant strain were not essential for virulence.
We next addressed the question of whether ANV2 was defective in its
interaction with the nematode host. It was previously
shown that
S. carpocapsae was able to mature and reproduce on
secondary
cells of
X. nematophilus (
18,
46). The ability of
the nematode to grow on, retain, and subsequently release the
bacteria
was evaluated as described in Materials and Methods.
Figure
2 shows a representative experiment. The
release and subsequent
growth of AN6 were initially detected 14.7 h after inoculation.
In contrast, the initial appearance of ANV2 in the
culture did
not occur until 20.7 h after inoculation. These
findings suggest
that ANV2 was defective in some aspect of its survival
within,
or in its release from, the nematode.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Nematode-bacteria assay. Five hundred surface-sterilized
dauer juvenile nematodes were inoculated into 5 ml of LB, and the
bacterial growth was monitored.
|
|
Cloning and sequence analysis of var1 and
orf2.
Since a single Tn10 insertion was found in
ANV2, it was possible that inactivation of a single gene was
responsible for the pleiotropic phenotype of this variant cell. To
confirm this possibility, the location of the Tn10 insertion
in ANV2 was determined. A 2.1-kb fragment containing the upstream
sequence flanking the transposon was cloned and sequenced. A partial
ORF that encoded 279 amino acid residues was found to share 43%
identity with the ybhE gene of E. coli. The
function of ybhE in E. coli is not known. The final nine codons of the ybhE-like gene of X. nematophilus are shown in Fig. 3.
The transposon was found to be inserted 320 base pairs downstream of
the stop codon of the ybhE-like gene. An ORF encoding 84 residues to the point of the transposon insertion was identified. This
ORF was named var1 since its inactivation appeared to be
involved in the formation of the variant type cell. To obtain the
entire nucleotide sequence of var1, a
var1-containing clone was obtained from the chromosomal
library of the wild type. Sequence analysis of the DNA region
containing var1 is shown in Fig. 3. The var1 gene
encodes a protein consisting of 121 amino acid residues. The transposon
had inserted into the codon for Ala84. A consensus ribosome binding
site was found 10 bp upstream of the predicted start codon. Var1 showed
no sequence similarity to any protein in the GenBank database.

View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Nucleotide sequences of var1 and
orf2 and their deduced amino acid sequences. The putative
ribosome binding sites are underlined. The putative promoter consensus
sequences are double underlined. The site of transposon insertion is
marked with an arrowhead. Restriction sites used for complementation
analysis are indicated with small letters and are labeled above the
sequence.
|
|
The ORF located downstream of
var1 was named
orf2. The
orf2 gene encoded a protein of 192 amino acid residues and showed no
sequence similarity to any known
gene. The
orf2 gene, which is
transcribed in the opposite
direction of
var1, contained an identifiable
ribosome
binding site and consensus

10 and

35
70
promoter sequences. The nucleotide sequence of the region
upstream
of
orf2 was also determined (Fig.
4). Three genes which shared
amino acid
identity with the
E. coli genes
bioA,
bioB, and
bioF were identified. The level of
sequence identity was 72, 69, and
58%, for
bioA,
bioB, and
bioF, respectively. These genes are
involved
in biotin biosynthesis in
E. coli and other enteric
bacteria.
The level of identity for
bioA was based on the
complete sequence
of this gene while that for
bioB and
bioF was based on a partial
sequence. This sequence analysis
revealed that in
X. nematophilus the six
ybh
genes found in this region of the
E. coli chromosome
have
been replaced with the
var1-
orf2 sequence in
X. nematophilus.
Interestingly, the guanine-plus-cytosine
content of
var1 and
orf2 was 41 and 36%,
respectively, while the average guanine-plus-cytosine
content of the
X. nematophilus genes so far sequenced, including
those
presented in this study, is 46%.

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Comparison of the ybh-bio regions in X. nematophilus and E. coli. The site where the
Tn10 inserted is marked with the circle. E,
EcoRI; RV, EcoRV; C, Csp45I; Cl,
ClaI.
|
|
Complementation of in vitro phenotypes.
The above results
suggested that the variant cell phenotype of ANV2 was caused by
inactivation of var1. Because orf2 was
transcribed in the opposite direction, it was not likely that the
Tn10 insertion had a polar effect on this gene. To ensure
that it was inactivation of var1 alone that produced the
ANV2 phenotype, complementation experiments were carried out. The
plasmid pJV9, carrying a 5.3-kb fragment containing var1,
orf2, and the bio genes, was constructed. Introduction of pJV9 into ANV2 completely complemented the variant type
cell (Table 4) and restored the OpnS
production to wild-type levels (Fig. 1, lane 3). These results
supported the idea that var1 function was required for the
expression of the numerous traits that were altered in ANV2. To further
analyze whether var1 alone was sufficient for the
complementation of ANV2, the DNA sequence spanning the upstream
regulatory region and the first 10 amino acid residues of
orf2 was deleted, generating pJV12. This plasmid contained
the var1 and bio genes but lacked the
orf2 gene. ANV2 containing pJV12 was almost completely
complemented (Table 4). Thus, var1 function alone was
sufficient to restore almost all of the phenotypic traits altered in
ANV2. Interestingly, pJV12 only partially restored the production of
OpnB and OpnS to wild-type levels (Fig. 1, lane 4), suggesting that
orf2 may play a role in the production and/or processing of
these stationary-phase outer membrane proteins. To be certain that the
bio genes were not involved in the complementation of ANV2,
the plasmid pJV10, which lacked var1 and orf2 but
retained the bio genes, was constructed. As expected, pJV10
was unable to complement ANV2 (Table 4 and Fig. 1, lane 5). These
results confirm that the var1 gene itself is required for
the production of the numerous phenotypic traits altered in ANV2 and
that the inactivation of this gene resulted in the formation of the
variant type cell.
To address the question whether
var1 was inactivated in
other variant cells, pJV9 was conjugated into the secondary cells
of
both 19061 and AN6. These strains were not complemented by
pJV9,
indicating that genes other than
var1 were altered in these
variant cells. Finally, while restriction analysis suggested that
the
transposon had inserted into different chromosomal locations
in ANV1,
ANV2, and ANV4, it was possible that the transposon had
actually
inserted into different positions of
var1. This was not
the
case, since pJV9 did not complement ANV1 and ANV4, indicating
that
genes other than
var1 were affected in these variant
strains.
Complementation of in vivo phenotypes.
Since plasmids
containing var1 were able to complement ANV2 in vitro, we
addressed whether the defect in its interaction with, or survival
within, the nematode could be complemented. Dauer juveniles grown on
ANV2 carrying either pJV9, pJV10, or pJV12 were surface sterilized and
were inoculated in LB. The initial time of bacterial growth was
monitored as shown in Table 5. The initial growth of ANV2 was previously shown to be delayed for 6 h
relative to that of AN6 (Fig. 2 and Table 5). When ANV2 carried plasmids containing var1 (pJV9 or pJV12), the time of
initial bacterial growth was comparable to that of AN6, indicating that var1 was able to correct the defect in the interaction with
the nematode. In contrast, this defect was not corrected in ANV2
carrying pJV10, further supporting the conclusion that var1
was required for normal interaction with, or survival within the
nematode.
The question of whether a delay in the initial time of bacterial growth
would be reflected in a delay in killing of the insect
host during
natural infection was next addressed. Fourth-instar
M. sexta
larvae were naturally infected with nematodes carrying
the
different bacterial strains described above. As shown in Table
6, the LT
50 for nematodes
containing ANV2/pJV10 was 45.8 h, which
was 7 to 8 h longer
than that for nematodes carrying the parent
strain. In contrast,
the LT
50s of ANV2 carrying either pJV9 or
pJV12 were
comparable to that of AN6. These findings indicated
that the delay in
the initial growth of ANV2 correlated with a
delay in the killing
of the insect when the bacteria were introduced
via the nematode. When
ANV2 contained
var1-bearing plasmids, both
the delay in
initial growth and the delay in insect killing were
corrected.
 |
DISCUSSION |
During prolonged culturing of Xenorhabdus spp.,
secondary cells that lack numerous primary-specific traits arise
spontaneously at an unpredictable frequency. Secondary variants have
not been isolated during exponential growth. At least eight
diverse primary-specific characteristics are consistently affected
in the secondary cells of all strains of X. nematophilus
studied to date (Table 2). Other characteristics, such as lecithinase
production, swimming motility, and cell shape, were more variable. The
mechanism underlying secondary cell formation is not known. We show
that disruption of a single gene, var1, produced a secondary
cell that was very similar to the spontaneously formed 19061/II strain.
This result suggests that spontaneous formation of the secondary
variant cell could result from a mutation in a single gene. This event
appears to occur under prolonged culturing conditions but not during
exponential growth. Our results show that var1 is not the
only gene involved in secondary cell formation since plasmids
containing the var1 gene did not complement the
19061/II, AN6/II, ANV1, and ANV4 strains. Furthermore, Tn10
insertions in the ANV1, ANV2, and ANV4 strains were located in
different chromosomal positions. Thus, the expression of
primary-specific traits is complex and may involve multiple levels of regulation.
The fact that a single transposon insertion eliminated the production
of the primary-specific traits, and that these traits are also
affected in the secondary variants of all strains of X. nematophilus examined, suggests that the
primary-specific genes are coordinately regulated. Since none of the
primary-specific genes have been cloned, we can only speculate about
how inactivation of var1 affects the production of the
primary-specific genes. It is conceivable that the primary-specific
genes are coordinately regulated at the level of transcription.
Although BLAST search analysis indicated that the Var1 protein was not
similar to any known regulatory protein, it may function as a small DNA
binding protein, such as integration host factor, that globally
regulates gene expression. Primary-specific genes may require this type of regulatory protein for their expression. It is also possible that
the production of individual gene products is controlled posttranscriptionally or at the level of protein processing and/or protein secretion. For example, Var1 may function as a specific chaperone that is necessary for the proper folding or secretion of
primary-specific products. The pleiotropic phenotype of ANV2 may also
be due to an alteration in protein transport and secretion pathways or altered membrane properties. The primary-specific products
may be secreted via the specific transport system which would be absent
or nonfunctional in secondary cells. It is conceivable that OpnB
participates in these transport processes. Since crystal protein
production and stationary-phase cell shape were also altered in
ANV2, it appears that var1 affects other cellular functions as well. Understanding the level of regulation of the individual primary-specific traits should help to elucidate whether, and how, these genes are coordinately regulated.
ANV2 and ANV4 were longer rods under stationary-phase conditions while
the parent strain bacteria were shorter rods under these
conditions. E. coli cells also become short rods under
stationary-phase conditions. The alternative sigma factor,
rpoS, is involved in controlling genes that regulate this
stationary-phase cell shape phenotype (39). It remains to be
determined whether var1 affects rpoS function in
X. nematophilus.
While the primary-specific properties are thought to be important for
the growth of the nematode in the insect cadaver, it was not known
whether they were directly involved in the interaction between
the bacterium and the nematode. We show that when nematodes carrying either ANV2 or 19061/II were placed in broth culture, initial
bacterial growth was delayed relative to that seen with the parent
strain (Fig. 2). The LT50 for natural infection with ANV2-bearing nematodes was also increased (Table 5). The delay in
initial bacterial growth may indicate that the ANV2 and secondary strains survive less well in the nematode than does the parent strain.
Fewer bacterial cells in the intestinal sac would result in a longer
lag phase for initial bacterial growth. One intriguing possibility is
that the crystal proteins play a role in survival of the bacterium in
the nematode. Another possible explanation for the delay in initial
growth is that X. nematophilus may require an active process
such as swarming motility to leave the nematode. Since ANV2 and
secondary cells do not swarm, they may leave the nematode via a slower,
passive process. To elucidate the role of primary-specific traits in
the interaction between the nematode and the bacteria, it will be
necessary to create mutant strains in which individual primary-specific
genes are inactivated.
Secondary (phase II) variants have also been isolated during prolonged
culturing of Photorhabdus spp. (1, 3, 24). The
secondary variants of Photorhabdus are pathogenic but do not support growth of the Heterorhabditidae nematodes in vitro
(1, 8). It was recently shown that an inactivation of either
one of the two different crystal genes, cipA and
cipB, resulted in a pleiotropic phenotype that resembled
secondary cells (7). The cipA mutant and
cipB mutant strains grew normally and were fully
pathogenic, but did not support growth of nematodes in
vitro. Taken together, these findings support the idea that
primary-specific traits are involved in the symbiotic interaction
between the bacteria and the nematode. Several primary-specific
products, such as antibiotic and crystal protein production, are shared
by both Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus. However,
the biochemical properties of these products are very different.
The antibiotics produced by Xenorhabdus are either
indole derivatives or belong to the xenocoumacin or xenorhabdin
family of compounds, while the antibiotics of Photorhabdus are hydroxystilbenes (2, 24, 42). The biochemical properties of the crystal proteins of the respective bacteria are also very different (7, 14). It is therefore probable that the genes responsible for these phenotypic traits were acquired laterally and
have been retained to participate in the symbiotic function of the
bacterium. The acquired genes presumably came under the control of a
preexisting regulatory network in the cell.
While primary-specific traits were altered in all secondary cells so
far studied, several traits, such as lecithinase and OpnS production,
stationary-phase cell shape, and swimming motility, varied among the
various strains. For example, ANV2 overproduced OpnS and grew as long
rods during stationary phase, whereas OpnS was not overproduced in
19061/II and cells were short rods under stationary-phase conditions.
There were also significant differences among the secondary cells of
different strains of X. nematophilus. 19061/II was able to
swim and produced lecithinase while the secondary cells of other
strains (Table 3) were nonmotile and lacked lecithinase activity. These
findings suggest that the regulation of the primary-specific and
variable traits is complex. Identifying the genes that have been
altered in the various secondary and ANV strains would help to
elucidate the genetic network involved in the formation of secondary
cells of X. nematophilus. With this information, it may be
possible to understand the role of primary-specific and variable traits
in the symbiotic interaction between the bacterium and the nematode.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank H. Owen for her assistance in the electron microscopy
analysis performed in this study and J. Witten for kindly providing M. sexta larvae. We are also grateful to B. Jester for
helping with figure design and editing the manuscript. We thank B. Boylan and A. Givaudan for their critical reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin, P.O. Box 413, Lapham Hall 458, Milwaukee, WI 53201. Phone: (414) 229-6373. Fax: (414) 229-3926. E-mail: sforst{at}csd.uwm.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Akhurst, R. J.
1980.
Morphological and functional dimorphisms in Xenorhabdus spp., bacteria symbiotically associated with the insect pathogenic nematodes Neoaplectana and Heterorhabditis.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
121:303-309.
|
| 2.
|
Akhurst, R. J.
1982.
Antibiotic activity of Xenorhabdus spp., bacteria symbiotically associated with insect pathogenic nematodes of the families Heterorhabditidae and Steinernematidae.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
128:3061-3065[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Akhurst, R. J., and N. Boemare.
1990.
Biology and taxonomy of Xenorhabdus, p. 75-90.
In
R. Gaugler, and H. K. Kaya (ed.), Entomopathogenic nematodes in biological control. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 4.
|
Akhurst, R. J., and G. B. Dunphy.
1993.
Tripartite interactions between symbiotically associated entomopathogenic bacteria, nematodes, and their insect hosts, p. 1-23.
In
N. Beckage, S. Thompson, and B. Federici (ed.), Parasites and pathogens of insects, vol. 2. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 5.
|
Akhurst, R. J.,
A. J. Smigielski,
J. Mari,
N. Boemare, and R. G. Mourant.
1992.
Restriction analysis of phase variation in Xenorhabdus spp. (Enterobacteriaceae), entomopathogenic bacteria associated with nematodes.
Syst. Appl. Microbiol.
15:469-473.
|
| 6.
|
Ausubel, F. M.,
R. Brent,
R. E. Kingston,
D. D. Moore,
J. A. Smith,
J. G. Seidman, and K. Struhl (ed.).
1987.
Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria, p. 2.4.1-2.4.2.
In
Current protocols in molecular biology. Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital. Wiley Interscience, New York, N.Y.
|
| 7.
|
Bintrim, S. B., and J. C. Ensign.
1998.
Insertional inactivation of genes encoding the crystalline inclusion proteins of Photorhabdus luminescens results in mutants with pleiotropic phenotypes.
J. Bacteriol.
180:1261-1269[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Boemare, N. E., and R. J. Akhurst.
1988.
Biochemical and physiological characterization of colony form variants in Xenorhabdus spp. (Enterobacteriaceae).
J. Gen. Microbiol.
134:751-761.
|
| 9.
|
Boemare, N. E., and R. J. Akhurst.
1990.
Physiology of phase variation in Xenorhabdus nematophilus, p. 208-212.
In
D. J. Cooper, J. Drummond, and D. E. Pinnock (ed.), Proceedings of the 5th International Colloquium on Invertebrate Pathology and Microbial Control.Adelaide, Australia.
|
| 10.
|
Boemare, N.,
R. J. Akhurst, and R. G. Mourant.
1993.
DNA relatedness between Xenorhabdus spp. (Enterobacteriaceae), symbiotic bacteria of entomopathogenic nematodes, and a proposal to transfer Xenorhabdus luminescens to a new genus, Photorhabdus gen. nov.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
43:249-255[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Boemare, N.,
A. Givaudan,
M. Brehelin, and C. Laumond.
1997.
Symbiosis and pathogenicity of nematode-bacterium complexes.
Symbiosis
22:21-45.
|
| 12.
|
Boemare, N.,
J.-O. Thaler, and A. Lanois.
1997.
Simple bacteriological tests for phenotypic characterization of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus phase variants.
Symbiosis
22:167-175.
|
| 13.
|
Brehelin, M. A.,
L. Cherqui,
L. Drif,
L. Luciani,
R. J. Akhurst, and N. E. Boemare.
1993.
Ultrastructure study of surface components of Xenorhabdus sp. in different cell phases and culture conditions.
J. Invertebr. Pathol.
61:188-191[CrossRef].
|
| 14.
|
Couche, G. A., and R. P. Gregson.
1987.
Protein inclusions produced by the entomopathogenic bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophilus subsp. nematophilus.
J. Bacteriol.
169:5279-5288[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
de Lorenzo, V., and K. N. Timmis.
1994.
Analysis and construction of stable phenotypes in Gram-negative bacteria with Tn5 and Tn10-derived mini transposons.
Methods Enzymol.
235:386-405[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Dowds, B. C. A.
1997.
Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus gene structure and expression, and genetic manipulation.
Symbiosis
22:67-83.
|
| 17.
|
Dunphy, G. B., and J. M. Webster.
1988.
Interaction of Xenorhabdus nematophilus subsp. nematophilus with the haemolymph of Galleria mellonella.
Int. J. Parasitol.
30:883-889.
|
| 18.
|
Ehlers, R.-U.,
S. Stoessel, and U. Wyss.
1990.
The influence of phase variants of Xenorhabdus spp. and Escherichia coli (Enterobacteriaceae) on the propagation of entomopathogenic nematodes of the genera Steinernema and Heterorhabditis.
Rev. Nematol.
13:417-424.
|
| 19.
|
Fodor, A.
1996.
Genetic analysis of Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus, p. 93-108.
In
N. Boemare, R.-U. Ehlers, A. Fodor, and A. Szentirmai (ed.), Symbiosis and pathogenicity of nematode-bacteria complexes. COST 819 entomopathogenic nematodes report EUR 167727 EN, ECSC-EC-EAEC. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
|
| 20.
|
Fodor, A.,
G. Vecseri, and T. Farkas.
1990.
Caenorhabditis elegans as a model for the study of entomopathogenic nematodes, p. 249-284.
In
R. Gaugler, and H. Kaya (ed.), Entomopathogenic nematodes in biological control. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 21.
|
Fodor, E.,
E. Szallas,
Z. Kiss,
A. Fodor,
L. I. Horvath,
D. J. Chitwood, and T. Farkas.
1997.
Composition and biophysical properties of lipids in Xenorhabdus nematophilus and Photorhabdus luminescens, symbiotic bacteria associated with entomopathogenic nematodes.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63:2826-2831[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Forst, S.,
D. Comeau,
S. Norioka, and M. Inouye.
1987.
Localization and membrane topology of EnvZ, a protein involved in osmoregulation of OmpF and OmpC in Escherichia coli.
J. Biol. Chem.
262:16433-16438[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Forst, S.,
J. Waukau,
G. Leisman,
M. Exner, and R. Hancock.
1995.
Functional and regulatory analysis of the OmpF-like porin, OpnP, of the symbiotic bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophilus.
Mol. Microbiol.
18:779-789[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Forst, S., and K. H. Nealson.
1996.
Molecular biology of the symbiotic-pathogenic bacteria Xenorhabdus spp. and Photorhabdus spp.
Microbiol. Rev.
60:21-43[Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Forst, S.,
B. Dowds,
N. Boemare, and E. Stackebrandt.
1997.
Xenorhabdus spp. and Photorhabdus spp.: bugs that kill bugs.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
51:47-72[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Forst, S., and N. Tabatabai.
1997.
Role of the histidine kinase, EnvZ, in the production of outer membrane proteins in the symbiotic-pathogenic bacterium, Xenorhabdus nematophilus.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63:962-968[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Givaudan, A.,
S. Baghdiguian,
A. Lanois, and N. E. Boemare.
1995.
Swarming and swimming changes concomitant with phase variation in Xenorhabdus nematophilus.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
61:1408-1413[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Givaudan, A.,
A. Lanois, and N. E. Boemare.
1996.
Cloning and nucleotide sequence of a flagellin encoding genetic locus from Xenorhabdus nematophilus: phase variation leads to differential transcription of two flagellar genes (fliCD).
Gene
183:243-253[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Herrero, M.,
V. de Lorenzo, and K. N. Timmis.
1990.
Transposon vectors containing non-antibiotic resistance selection markers for cloning and stable chromosomal insertion of foreign genes in gram-negative bacteria.
J. Bacteriol.
172:6557-6567[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Hosseini, P. K., and K. H. Nealson.
1995.
Symbiotic luminous soil bacteria: unusual regulation for an unusual niche.
Photochem. Photobiol.
62:633-640.
|
| 31.
|
Hurlbert, R. E.
1994.
Investigations into the pathogenic mechanisms of the bacterium-nematode complex: the search for virulence determinants of Xenorhabdus nematophilus ATTC 19061 could lead to agriculturally useful products.
ASM News
60:473-489.
|
| 32.
|
Krasomil-Osterfeld, K. C.
1995.
Influence of osmolarity on phase shift in Photorhabdus luminescens.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
61:3748-3749[Abstract].
|
| 33.
|
Leclerc, M.-C., and N. E. Boemare.
1991.
Plasmids and phase variation in Xenorhabdus spp.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
57:2597-2601[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Leisman, G. B.,
J. Waukau, and S. A. Forst.
1995.
Characterization and environmental regulation of outer membrane proteins in Xenorhabdus nematophilus.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
61:200-204[Abstract].
|
| 35.
|
Nealson, K. H.,
T. M. Smith, and B. Bleakley.
1990.
Biochemistry and physiology of Xenorhabdus, p. 271-284.
In
R. Gaugler, and H. K. Kaya (ed.), Entomopathogenic nematodes in biological control. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 36.
|
Poinar, G. O., Jr.
1990.
Biology and taxonomy of Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae and physiology of Xenorhabdus, p. 271-284.
In
R. Gaugler, and H. K. Kaya (ed.), Entomopathogenic nematodes in biological control. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 37.
|
Quandt, J., and M. F. Hynes.
1993.
Versatile suicide vectors which allow direct selection for gene replacement in Gram-negative bacteria.
Gene
127:15-21[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 39.
|
Siegele, D. A., and R. Kolter.
1992.
Life after log.
J. Bacteriol.
174:345-348[Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Simon, R.,
U. Priefer, and A. Puhler.
1983.
A broad range host mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in gram negative bacteria.
Bio/Technology
1:784-791[CrossRef].
|
| 41.
|
Smigielski, A.,
R. J. Akhurst, and N. E. Boemare.
1994.
Phase variation in Xenorhabdus nematophilus and Photorhabdus luminescens: differences in respiratory activity and membrane energization.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
60:120-125[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Sundar, L., and F. N. Chang.
1993.
Antimicrobial activity and biosynthesis of indole antibiotics produced by Xenorhabdus nematophilus.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
139:3139-3148[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Szallas, E.,
C. Koch,
A. Fodor,
J. Burghardt,
O. Buss,
A. Szentirmai,
K. H. Nealson, and E. Stackebrandt.
1997.
Phylogenetic evidence for the taxonomic heterogeneity of Photorhabdus luminescens.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
47:402-407[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Tabatabai, N., and S. Forst.
1995.
Molecular analysis of the two-component genes, ompR and envZ, in the symbiotic bacterium, Xenorhabdus nematophilus.
Mol. Microbiol.
17:643-652[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Thaler, J.-O.,
B. Duvic,
A. Givaudan, and N. Boemare.
1998.
Isolation and entomotoxic properties of the Xenorhabdus nematophilus F1 lecithinase.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:2367-2373[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Volgyi, A.,
A. Fodor,
A. Szentirmai, and S. Forst.
1998.
Phase variation in Xenorhabdus nematophilus.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:1188-1193[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Wang, H., and B. C. A. Dowds.
1993.
Phase variation in Xenorhabdus luminescens: cloning and sequencing of the lipase gene and analysis of its expression in primary and secondary phases of the bacterium.
J. Bacteriol.
175:1665-1673[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Yamanaka, S.,
A. Hagiwara,
Y. Nishimura,
H. Tanabe, and N. Ishibashi.
1992.
Biochemical and physiological characteristics of Xenorhabdus species, symbiotically associated with entomopathogenic nematodes including Steinernema kushidai and their pathogenicity against Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).
Arch. Microbiol.
158:387-393.
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1622-1628, Vol. 66, No. 4
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Goetsch, M., Owen, H., Goldman, B., Forst, S.
(2006). Analysis of the PixA Inclusion Body Protein of Xenorhabdus nematophila.. J. Bacteriol.
188: 2706-2710
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
O'Neill, K. H., Roche, D. M., Clarke, D. J., Dowds, B. C. A.
(2002). The ner Gene of Photorhabdus: Effects on Primary-Form-Specific Phenotypes and Outer Membrane Protein Composition. J. Bacteriol.
184: 3096-3105
[Abstract]
[Full Text]