Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1634-1638, Vol. 66, No. 4
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Nitrile Hydratase and Amidase from
Rhodococcus rhodochrous Hydrolyze Acrylic Fibers and
Granular Polyacrylonitriles
M. M.
Tauber,1,2
A.
Cavaco-Paulo,2
K.-H.
Robra,1 and
G. M.
Gübitz1,*
Institut für Mikrobiologie und
Abfalltechnologie, Technische Universität Graz, A-8010 Graz,
Austria,1 and Departamento de
Engenharia Textil, Universidade do Minho, P-4800 Guimaraes,
Portugal2
Received 1 November 1999/Accepted 19 January 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Rhodococcus rhodochrous NCIMB 11216 produced nitrile
hydratase (320 nkat mg of protein
1) and amidase activity
(38.4 nkat mg of protein
1) when grown on a medium
containing propionitrile. These enzymes were able to hydrolyze nitrile
groups of both granular polyacrylonitriles (PAN) and acrylic fibers.
Nitrile groups of PAN40 (molecular mass, 40 kDa) and PAN190 (molecular
mass, 190 kDa) were converted into the corresponding carbonic acids to
1.8 and 1.0%, respectively. In contrast, surfacial nitrile groups of
acrylic fibers were only converted to the corresponding amides. X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy analysis showed that 16% of the surfacial
nitrile groups were hydrolyzed by the R. rhodochrous
enzymes. Due to the enzymatic modification, the acrylic fibers became
more hydrophilic and thus, adsorption of dyes was enhanced. This was
indicated by a 15% increase in the staining level (K/S
value) for C.I. Basic Blue 9.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The ability to degrade nitriles is
quite common among microorganisms. The potential of nitrile-degrading
enzymes for biotransformations, waste treatment, and the production of
herbicide-resistant plants has been assessed (14, 29).
Stereoselective hydrolysis of nitriles and amides with whole cells or
isolated enzymes has been reported for a number of strains, such as
Pseudomonas putida (6, 28), Rhodococcus
erythropolis (10), Rhodococcus equi
(19), and Rhodococcus rhodochrous (13,
21). In Japan, enzymes from Pseudomonas chlororaphis
and R. rhodochrous are used for the production of low-cost
chemicals, such as acrylamide (23).
In nature, three different groups of enzymes are involved in the
microbial hydrolysis of nitriles. Nitrilases (EC 3.5.5.1 and 3.5.5.7)
hydrolyze nitriles to the corresponding carboxylic acids, forming
ammonia; nitrile hydratases (EC 4.2.1.84) form amides from nitriles
which can be subsequently hydrolyzed by amidases (EC 3.5.1.4). The
nocardiaform actinomycete R. rhodochrous has been reported
to produce both the nitrilase and the nitrile hydratase/amidase system,
depending on the inducer used (32).
Various nitrilases that hydrolyze aromatic and aliphatic substrates
have been described for R. rhodochrous. Some of these enzymes were selectively induced with benzonitrile and propionitrile, respectively (11). Nitrilases from R. rhodochrous
have been used for the production of acrylic and methacrylic acid
(23). "Aliphatic" nitrilases, such as those from various
R. rhodochrous strains (NCIMB 11216, K22, and J1), seem to
be quite unusual among microorganisms (11, 15, 23).
Formerly, nitrilases have been thought exclusively to hydrolyze
aromatic substances while aliphatic nitriles have been believed to be
degraded by a nitrile hydratase/amidase enzyme system (15).
The reaction mechanism, regulation, and photoactivation of nitrile
hydratases, which usually consist of
and
subunits containing either nonheme iron or cobalt atoms, have been studied in detail (14, 27). R. rhodochrous has been reported to
produce a high-molecular-weight nitrile hydratase and a
low-molecular-weight nitrile hydratase, which were selectively induced
by the reaction products (amides) and by urea, respectively (16,
22, 32). The high-molecular-weight nitrile hydratase from
R. rhodochrous is used for industrial production (30,000 tons/year) of acrylamide (14, 26, 32).
In this paper, we report on the modification of polyacrylonitrile (PAN)
fibers and granulates using enzymes from R. rhodochrous NCIMB 11216, which has previously been used for chemoselective hydrolysis of nitriles at our university (13). Although
acrylonitrile seems to be one of most suitable substrates for both
nitrile hydratase (25) and nitrilase from R. rhodochrous (15), there are no reports in the
literature on the enzymatic hydrolysis of PANs.
PAN fibers have a slightly increasing share of 2,700 tons/year in 1997, holding approximately 10% of the global synthetic fiber market.
Several attempts have been made in the last few years to increase the
ecoefficiency of the production processes, including the subsequent
dyeing of the fibers. However, various chemical methods for the
modification of PAN fibers to make them more hydrophilic and thereby
enhance dye uptake have not been very successful. Partial hydrolysis of
surfacial nitrile groups into amides and acids, which resist strong
acids and alkali, leads to irreversible yellowing of the fabrics.
Additionally, elevated reaction temperatures, aggressive chemicals, and
higher concentrations of dimethyl sulfoxide (12) would lead
to unwanted changes in the macroscopic behavior of the fibers.
Long-term mild alkali treatment led to lower dye uptake, which was
explained by hydrolysis of ester groups of the copolymers to less
hydrophilic hydroxyl (-OH) groups. Thus, selective enzymatic hydrolysis
of surfacial nitrile groups of PAN fibers offers a promising
alternative to chemical processes. The utilization of endoglucanases to
enhance the properties of cellulosic fibers has been studied
extensively, including contributions from our laboratories (2, 3,
9, 18), and several cellulase-based processes have been
introduced into the textile industry. Similarly, nitrile-degrading
enzymes could have an immense potential in this area.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Organism and culture conditions.
R. rhodochrous NCIMB
11216 was inoculated from agar stock cultures on potato dextrose agar
and grown in three steps using two rich media (media 1 and 2) and a
minimal medium containing propionitrile as described previously
(13). Additionally, a trace element solution containing the
following (concentrations in milligrams per liter are in parentheses)
was added: ZnSO4 · 7H2O (100),
MnCl2 · 4H2O (30),
H3BO3 (300), CoCl2 · 6H2O (200), CuSO4 · 5H2O
(10), NiCl2 · 6H2O (20), and
NaMoO4 · 2H2O (30). Cultures were grown
for 24 h in each medium at 30°C and 180 rpm. A quarter of the
cell harvest was used for inoculation of medium 2, and the total cell
harvest was used for inoculation of the minimal medium. Harvesting of
cells was performed at 2,500 × g for 10 min at 4°C.
Cells were disrupted by ultrasonic treatment on ice and centrifuged
again to obtain the cell-free supernatant (enzyme preparation).
Enzyme assay.
The incubation mixture for the determination
of nitrile-degrading enzyme activity contained 40 mg of the enzyme
preparation (protein) per liter, 25 mM acrylonitrile or acrylamide, and
20 mM K2HPO4/KH2PO4 as
a buffer (pH 6.5). The mixture was incubated at 30°C and 200 rpm, and
samples were taken every 5 min. The reaction was stopped after 60 min
by thermal inactivation of the enzymes, which were subsequently removed
by centrifugation. Gas chromatography was used for analysis of the
reaction products. The measurement was carried out using an HP5890
SerII gas chromatograph equipped with an HP-Innowax cross-linked
polyethylene glycol column (30 m by 0.25 mm). The column temperature
was raised to 220°C in accordance with the following profile: 0 to 1 min, 120°C; 1 to 11 min, increase to 220°C; 11 to 13 min, 220 °C.
Protein assay.
Protein adsorbed to the fabric was measured
by the Lowry method using bovine serum albumin as the standard
(8). A 150-mg fabric sample was incubated with 5 ml of a
solution containing (grams per liter) 16.6 Na2CO3, 4.0 NaOH, 0.2 Na-K tartrate, and 0.1 CuSO45H2O while shaking for 10 min at 22°C.
Thereafter, 10% (vol/vol) Folin Ciocalteau phenol reagent (1 N; Merck)
was added and the A750 was read after 30 min of
incubation at 22°C. The protein content in solution was determined by
the Bradford method (1). Specific enzyme activities were
calculated based on the protein content of the enzyme preparation.
Enzymatic treatment of PAN.
Two granular PAN standards (40 and 190 kDa; PSS Polymer Standards Service GmbH, Mainz, Germany) were
treated with the crude enzyme preparation. The incubation mixture
contained 1% (wt/vol) PAN and 0.36 or 0.0036% (wt/vol) enzyme
preparation (protein) in 1 ml of 57 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0).
Experiments were carried out in 1.5-ml screw-cap plastic flasks, which
were shaken at 300 rpm at 25°C for 72 h. The reaction was
stopped by centrifugation, and ammonia that had been released into the
supernatant was monitored as described previously during incubation for
15 min at 50°C (4).
Enzymatic treatment of acrylic fibers.
Commercial acrylic
fibers consisting of PAN and 7% (wt/wt) vinyl acetate as a copolymer
were obtained from Fisipe SA, Lavradio, Portugal. The acrylic fibers
were washed twice with tap water at 60°C for 1 h each time.
Enzymatic treatment was performed in screw-cap plastic flasks (100 ml)
at 30°C on a Linitest machine (horizontal shaker commonly used for
treatment of fabrics) rotating at 30 rpm for 3 days. The incubation
mixture contained 1.0 g of acrylic fibers, 5.0 mg of enzyme
preparation (protein) or heat-inactivated enzymes (control), and 0.5%
(vol/vol) dimethyl formamide (DMF) in 40 ml of 57 mM phosphate buffer
set to different pH values as indicated below. Subsequently, the
fabrics were washed with 1% (wt/vol) Na2CO3 at
pH 11 for 30 s, rinsed with distilled water for 10 s, and
dried for 1 h at 60°C. The release of acetic acid was monitored
using an enzyme-based assay kit from Boehringer.
Dyeing experiments.
Dyeing of enzymatically treated fabrics
was carried out using the Ahiba Spectradye system from Datacolor
International (Lucerne, Switzerland). A 2.0-g fabric sample, 80 mg of
methylene blue (C.I. 52015 Basic Blue 9; Sigma), and 20 mg of Coomassie
brilliant blue G (C.I. 42655 Acid Blue 90; Sigma) were incubated in 40 ml of distilled water (bath ratio, 1:20) at 50°C and 60 rpm for 60 min (temperature increase to 40°C from 0 to 5 min, addition of dye from 5 to 10 min at 40°C, increase to 50°C from 10 to 20 min, 50°C from 20 to 80 min, and cooling down to 20°C from 80 to 85 min). Dye uptake was quantified by measuring the K/S value,
which correlates to the reflectance (R in percent) in the
following way:
K/S values of the fabrics were measured using an ACS
reflectance spectrometer.
XPS.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was
carried out on an ESCALAB 200A (VG Scientific, West Sussex, United
Kingdom). The X-ray tube had Mg K
radiation, and the analyzing mode
was CAE. The following parameters were set for region spectra: maximum count rate, 29,905/s; analyze, 20 eV; step size, 0.10 eV; dwell time,
200 ms; number of channels, 201; number of scans, 10; time for region,
402 s.
If not otherwise stated, all experiments were carried out in duplicate
using analytical-grade chemicals from Merck.
 |
RESULTS |
Production of nitrile-degrading enzymes.
R. rhodochrous
NCIMB 11216 produced nitrile-degrading enzymes (nitrilase and/or the
nitrile hydratase/amidase enzyme system), as indicated by the formation
of propionic acid when the bacteria were grown on culture medium
containing propionitrile. During cultivation (24 h), 10% of the
propionitrile present was transformed into propionic acid.
On acrylonitrile as the biocatalytic substrate, a nitrile hydratase
activity of 14.2 nkat mg
1 (cell dry weight) was measured
in the cell extract, corresponding to a specific activity of 320 nkat
mg
1 (based on the measured protein content of the enzyme
preparation). Using acrylamide as a substrate for the enzyme the
R. rhodochrous enzyme preparation showed amidase activities
of 1.7 nkat mg
1 (cell dry weight) and 38.4 nkat
mg
1 (protein), respectively.
Enzymatic treatment of PANs.
The R. rhodochrous
enzymes were able to hydrolyze nitrile groups of granular PAN, as
indicated by the release of ammonia. Less ammonia was released from a
high-molecular-mass PAN (190 kDa; PAN190) (Fig.
1).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Hydrolysis of granular PANs with R. rhodochrous enzymes at different concentrations after 72 h of
incubation (expressed as a percentage of total possible conversion;
0.36 and 0.0036 g of enzyme g of PAN 1; control, 0.36 g of heat-inactivated enzyme g of PAN 1).
|
|
Surprisingly, no release of ammonia could be detected when acrylic
fabrics were treated with the R. rhodochrous enzyme
preparation. In addition, no acetic acid could be detected although the
enzyme preparation was able to hydrolyze ethyl acetate and naphthyl
acetate (data not shown). However, increases in the efficiency of
subsequent dyeing of 37 and 81% based on K/S values were
measured using methylene blue (C.I. Basic Blue 9) and Coomassie
brilliant blue G (C.I. Acid Blue 90), respectively, compared to a
control with heat-inactivated enzymes (Fig.
2). These results indicated that
surfacial nitrile groups were hydrolyzed to the corresponding amides.
The basic dye methylene blue interacts both with the carbonyl groups
from the copolymer vinyl acetate and with amides formed enzymatically from PAN. The acid dye Coomassie brilliant blue G interacts with its
sulfonylic groups with the protonated nitrogen of enzymatically formed
amide groups.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Dyeing of enzymatically pretreated acrylic fibers with
methylene blue and Coomassie brilliant blue G and effect of
posttreatment with Na2CO3 (control,
heat-inactivated enzyme).
|
|
The treatment was performed at different pH values. The best results
were obtained at pH 6.5 (Table 1).
Addition of DMF to increase the accessibility of nitrile groups at a
concentration no higher than 0.5% (vol/vol) was found to be beneficial
for the treatment. An enzyme concentration of 5 mg g
1 did
not show any substantial increase in the K/S value compared to 1 mg g
1; however, this concentration was used in all
further experiments to detect any potential leveling effect (Table 1).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Influence of enzymatic hydrolysis of acrylic fibers at
different pHs and DMF and protein concentrations on dyeing with
methylene blue
|
|
Measurements of the protein concentration of the incubation mixture and
of the protein on the washed fabrics revealed that 4.4 of the 5.0 mg g
of protein
1 added had adsorbed to the fibers.
Ninety-seven percent of the adsorbed protein could be removed by
posttreatment with Na2CO3. The posttreatment
reduced the beneficial effect of the enzyme treatment from a 37 to a
15% K/S increase for methylene blue, while the enzyme
effect was more pronounced when dyeing with Coomassie brilliant blue G
was followed by posttreatment (100% increase in the K/S
value; Fig. 2). Removal of the adsorbed protein was necessary to avoid
nonleveling of the fabrics due to adsorption of the dye on the protein.
This effect was less pronounced for Coomassie brilliant blue G.
To confirm our hypothesis that the increase in dyeing efficiency
resulted from the formation of surfacial amide groups, we compared
several techniques for the quantification of the enzyme effect on
acrylic fibers. Both the Fourier-transform infrared and RAMAN
microspectroscopy methods failed for this purpose. XPS is a surface
analysis technique allowing measurement of the sample composition to a
depth of 5 nm. Using this technique, we were able to detect the changes
caused by the enzyme treatment.
Measuring the elementary composition of acrylic fibers with XPS, we
found that the oxygen content increased significantly in the
enzyme-treated samples. There was a 45% increase between the blank and
enzyme-treated samples. Compared to a control with heat-inactivated
enzyme, a 27% increase can be ascribed to the effect of the active
enzymes. The enzyme effect was less pronounced when PAN was posttreated
with Na2CO3, which could be due to alkaline hydrolysis of the nitrile groups. The carbon content of all
enzyme-treated samples decreased slightly in response to the increase
in oxygen, while the nitrogen content showed only insignificant
variations (Fig. 3). These results
indicate that nitrile groups were converted into amides. About 16%
(5% for Na2CO3-posttreated samples) of the
nitrile groups in enzymatically treated PAN fibers were converted to
amides. However, the actual values reveal the elementary composition of
the fiber surface and not that of the whole sample (Fig.
4), which is in agreement with the
substantial increases in dyeing efficiency caused by the enzyme
treatment.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Changes in the elementary composition of enzymatically
treated acrylic fibers (determined by XPS analysis; error bars indicate
values from two separate experiments).
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
XPS analysis of acrylic fibers. A typical peak survey
diagram is shown. KLL peaks are due to the Auger effect.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
R. rhodochrous NCIMB 11216 can transform a wide range
of nitriles (11, 13). In this paper, we report for the first
time that the enzymes of R. rhodochrous can also hydrolyze
surfacial nitrile groups of PAN fibers and granulates. R. rhodochrous hydrolyzed monomeric acrylonitrile and acrylamide with
nitrile hydratase and amidase, respectively, when grown in the presence
of propionitrile. Recently, a nitrilase from R. rhodochrous
NCIMB 11216 hydrolyzing aliphatic nitriles has been described which was
produced during cultivation of the organism in the presence of
propionitrile and benzonitrile (11). Previously, other
authors reported the existence of both a nitrile hydratase/amidase
system and a nitrilase in R. rhodochrous NCIMB 11216 (13).
On acrylonitrile, the nitrile hydratase activity of the R. rhodochrous enzyme preparation was 14.2 nkat mg
1
(cell dry weight). Previously, on the same substrate, nitrilase activities of 11 and 63 nkat mg
1 were measured for
R. rhodochrous NCIMB 11216 and J1, respectively, when these
strains had been cultivated in the presence of caprolactam (24). However, this "nitrilase" activity on
acrylonitrile could also result from the cooperative action of nitrile
hydratase and amidase because the intermediately formed amides cannot
be detected if instantly hydrolyzed by amidase. In this case, the
presence of nitrile hydratase can be determined if amidase is
selectively inhibited (17). We found that the nitrile
hydratase activity of R. rhodochrous NCIMB was significantly
higher than amidase activity (1.7 nkat mg
1 on
acrylamide), which is in contrast to observations for enzymes from
R. erythropolis (17).
Hydrolysis of nitrile groups of PANs with enzymes from R. rhodochrous was studied with two granular PAN standards (40 and 190 kDa) and commercial acrylic fibers containing vinyl acetate as a
copolymer. Interestingly, nitrile groups of both PAN40 and PAN190 were
partially converted to the corresponding acid while nitrile groups of
acrylic fibers were only hydrolyzed to the amide. Thus, nitrile
hydratases hydrolyzed surfacial nitrile groups of acrylic fibers but
the resulting amides were obviously not accessible to amidases. In
agreement with these results, amidases from R. rhodochrous
NCIMB 11216 and AJ270 have been reported to be generally more sensitive
to the geometry of the substrate than nitrile hydratases (5,
20). Esterases from R. rhodochrous have previously
caused problems during biotransformations of nitriles with ester
function (13). Nevertheless, we have not observed any
concurrent hydrolysis of vinyl acetate by esterases during hydrolysis
of surfacial nitrile groups of acrylic fibers.
Pretreatment of acrylic fibers with R. rhodochrous enzymes
improved fabric-dyeing efficiency, as indicated by K/S value
increases. However, in the case of methylene blue, posttreatment of the
fabrics with sodium carbonate to remove adsorbed enzymes seemed to be necessary to gain leveling. Nonleveling during dyeing is caused by
adsorption of dye to the fiber-bound enzymes. This phenomenon depends
both on the type of enzyme and on the dyeing conditions, as we have
previously shown for indigo backstaining during cellulose washing
(3).
Surfacial nitrile groups of acrylic fibers were hydrolyzed by the
R. rhodochrous enzymes to a maximum of only 16%, although acrylonitrile is known to be a very good substrate for both nitrilases and nitrile hydratases from these organism (15, 25).
However, the enzyme reaction on PAN is restricted by several factors
related to the properties of the polymer. The structure of PAN is
assumed to have a rigid, irregularly helical conformation of the
polymer chain including planar zigzag packing (Fig.
5). The cylinders, with a diameter of 6 nm, can bind to each other through the antiparallel orientation of the
side groups. In the model of Warner, fibers are composed of fibrillar
subunits containing distinct regions of amorphous and partially ordered
material (30).
Enzyme adsorption to and desorption from the polymer affect the
hydrolysis rate. Additionally, the crystallinity and hydrophobicity of
PAN fibers may limit the accessibility of nitrile groups to the enzyme.
Similarly, the structure and properties of cellulose influence its
enzymatic degradation. It has been suggested that endoglucanases
randomly cleave cellulose into smaller fragments, generating new ends,
which are then hydrolyzed endwise by the action of cellobiohydrolases.
These latter enzymes are also thought to erode crystalline regions of
cellulose, making them more susceptible to endoglucanase attack
(31).
In contrast to that of synthetic PAN polymers, enzymatic hydrolysis of
natural polymers like cellulose has been investigated for decades. The
architecture of cellulose-degrading enzymes has been studied in detail,
and the function of the active sites and binding domains related to
specificities for cellulose has been elucidated. Based on this
knowledge, these enzymes and genetically improved products have been
successfully applied in the textile industry. Similarly,
nitrile-degrading enzymes could have an immense potential for the
improvement of PAN fibers. Thus, future investigations could focus on
the reaction mechanisms of nitrilases and nitrile hydratases in
relation to the structure and properties of PANs.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Eurotex-Leonardo for scholarship support of M. M. Tauber.
We thank J. Andreaus and N. Klempier for valuable discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut
für Mikrobiologie und Abfalltechnologie, Technische
Universität Graz, Petersgasse 12, A-8010 Graz, Austria. Phone: 43 316 8738312. Fax: 43 316 8738815. E-mail:
guebitz{at}ima.tu-graz.ac.at.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bradford, M.
1976.
A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.
Anal. Biochem.
72:248-254[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Cavaco-Paulo, A.,
L. Almeida, and D. Bishop.
1998.
Hydrolysis of cotton cellulose by engineered cellulases from Trichoderma reesei.
Text. Res. J.
68:273-280.
|
| 3.
|
Cavaco-Paulo, A.,
J. Morgado,
L. Almeida, and D. Kilburn.
1998.
Indigo backstaining during cellulase washing.
Text. Res. J.
68:398-401.
|
| 4.
|
Cramp, R.,
M. Gilmour, and D. A. Cowan.
1997.
Novel thermophilic bacteria producing nitrile degrading enzymes.
Microbiology (Reading)
143:2313-2320.
|
| 5.
|
De Raadt, A.,
N. Klempier,
K. Faber, and H. Griengl.
1992.
Chemoselective enzymatic hydrolysis of aliphatic and alicyclic nitriles.
J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans.
1:137-140.
|
| 6.
|
Fallon, R. D.,
B. Stieglitz, and I. M. Turner.
1997.
A Pseudomonas putida capable of stereoselective hydrolysis of nitriles.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
47:156-161[CrossRef].
|
| 7.
|
Frushour, B. G.
1995.
Acrylic polymer characterization in solid state and solution, p. 207.
In
J. C. Masson (ed.), Acrylic fiber technology and application. Mercel Dekker Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 8.
|
Ghose, T.
1987.
Measurement of cellulase activities.
Pure Appl. Chem.
58:257-268.
|
| 9.
|
Gübitz, G. M.,
T. Lischnig,
D. Stebbing, and J. N. Saddler.
1997.
Enzymatic removal of hemicellulose from dissolving pulps.
Biotechnol. Lett.
19:491-495[CrossRef].
|
| 10.
|
Hirrlinger, B., and A. Stolz.
1997.
Formation of a chiral hydroxamic acid with an amidase from Rhodococcus erythropolis MP50 and subsequent chemical Lossen rearrangement to a chiral amine.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63:3390-3393[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Hoyle, A. J.,
A. W. Bunch, and C. J. Knowles.
1998.
The nitrilases of Rhodococcus rhodochrous NCIMB11216.
Enzyme Microb. Technol.
23:475-482[CrossRef].
|
| 12.
|
Katritzky, A. R.,
B. Pilarsky, and L. Urogdi.
1989.
Efficient conversion of nitriles to amides with basic hydrogen peroxide in dimethyl sulfoxide.
Synthesis
12:949-950[CrossRef].
|
| 13.
|
Klempier, N.,
G. Harter,
A. De Raadt,
H. Griengl, and G. Braunegg.
1996.
Chemoselective hydrolysis of nitriles by Rhodococcus rhodochrous NCIMB 11216.
Food Technol. Biotechnol.
34:67-70.
|
| 14.
|
Kobayashi, M., and S. Shimizu.
1998.
Metalloenzyme nitrile hydratase structure, regulation, and application to biotechnology.
Nat. Biotechnol.
16:733-736[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Kobayashi, M.,
N. Yanaka,
T. Nagasawa, and H. Yamada.
1990.
Purification and characterization of a novel nitrilase of Rhodococcus rhodochrous K22 that acts on aliphatic nitriles.
J. Bacteriol.
172:4807-4815[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Komeda, H.,
M. Kobayashi, and S. Shimizu.
1996.
A novel gene-cluster including the Rhodococcus rhodochrous J1 nhlBA genes encoding a low-molecular-mass nitrile hydratase (L-NHase) induced by its reaction product.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:15796-15802[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Langdahl, B. R.,
P. Bisp, and K. Ingvorsen.
1996.
Nitrile hydrolysis by Rhodococcus erythropolis BL1, an acetonitrile-tolerant strain isolated from a marine sediment.
Microbiology (Reading)
142:145-154.
|
| 18.
|
Mansfield, S. D.,
J. N. Saddler, and G. M. Gübitz.
1998.
Characterisation of two endoglucanases from the brown-rot fungi Gloeophyllum sepiarium and Gloeophyllum trabeum.
Enzyme Microb. Technol.
23:133-140.
|
| 19.
|
Martinkova, L.,
A. Stolz, and H. J. Knackmuss.
1996.
Enantioselectivity of the nitrile hydratase from Rhodococcus equi A4 towards substitutes (R,S)-2-arylpropionitriles.
Biotechnol. Lett.
18:1073-1076[CrossRef].
|
| 20.
|
Methcohn, O., and M. X. Wang.
1997.
An in-depth study of the biotransformation of nitriles into amides and/or acids using Rhodococcus rhodochrous AJ270.
J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans.
1:1099-1104.
|
| 21.
|
Methcohn, O., and M. X. Wang.
1997.
Rationalization of the regioselective hydrolysis of aliphatic dinitriles with Rhodococcus rhodochrous AJ270.
Chem. Commun.
11:1041-1042[CrossRef].
|
| 22.
|
Mizunashi, W.,
M. Nishiyama,
S. Horinouchi, and T. Beppu.
1998.
Overexpression of high-molecular-mass nitrile hydratase from Rhodococcus rhodochrous J1 in recombinant Rhodococcus cells.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
49:568-572[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Nagasawa, T.,
T. Nakamura, and H. Yamada.
1990.
Production of acrylic acid and methacrylic acid using Rhodococcus rhodochrous J1 nitrilase.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
34:322-324.
|
| 24.
|
Nagasawa, T.,
T. Nakamura, and H. Yamada.
1990.
-Caprolactam, a new powerful inducer for the formation of Rhodococcus rhodochrous J1 nitrilase.
Arch. Microbiol.
155:13-17[CrossRef].
|
| 25.
|
Nagasawa, T.,
H. Shimizu, and H. Yamada.
1993.
The superiority of the third-generation catalyst, Rhodococcus rhodochrous J1 nitrile hydratase, for industrial production of acrylamide.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
40:189-195.
|
| 26.
|
Nagasawa, T., and H. Yamada.
1995.
Microbial production of commodity chemicals.
Pure Appl. Chem.
67:1241-1256.
|
| 27.
|
Odaka, M.,
K. Fujii,
M. Hoshino,
T. Noguchi,
M. Tsujimura,
S. Nagashima,
M. Yohda,
T. Nagamune,
Y. Inoue, and I. Endo.
1997.
Activity regulation of photoreactive nitrile hydratase by nitric oxide.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
119:3785-3791[CrossRef].
|
| 28.
|
Payne, M. S.,
S. J. Wu,
R. D. Fallon,
G. Tudor,
B. Stieglitz,
I. M. Turner, and M. J. Nelson.
1997.
A stereoselective cobalt-containing nitrile hydratase.
Biochemistry
36:5447-5454[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Sugai, T.,
T. Yamazaki,
M. Yokoyama, and H. Ohta.
1997.
Biocatalysis in organic-synthesis the use of nitrile-hydrolyzing and amide-hydrolyzing microorganisms.
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.
61:1419-1427.
|
| 30.
|
Warner, S. B.
1975.
Structure of acrylics.
J. Mater. Sci.
10:758[CrossRef].
|
| 31.
|
Wood, M. T.
1992.
Fungal cellulases.
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
20:46-53[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Yamada, H., and M. Kobayashi.
1996.
Nitrile hydratase and its application to industrial production of acrylamide.
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.
60:1391-1400[Medline].
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1634-1638, Vol. 66, No. 4
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Asara, J. M., Schweitzer, M. H., Freimark, L. M., Phillips, M., Cantley, L. C.
(2007). Protein Sequences from Mastodon and Tyrannosaurus Rex Revealed by Mass Spectrometry. Science
316: 280-285
[Abstract]
[Full Text]