AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakabachi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ishikawa, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakabachi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ishikawa, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nakabachi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ishikawa, H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2000, p. 3305-3309, Vol. 66, No. 8
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Polyamine Composition and Expression of Genes Related to Polyamine Biosynthesis in an Aphid Endosymbiont, Buchnera

Atsushi Nakabachidagger and Hajime Ishikawa*

Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Sciences University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan

Received 10 March 2000/Accepted 26 May 2000


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Polyamine composition in an aphid endosymbiotic bacterium, Buchnera sp., was determined by high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis. We found that Buchnera contained virtually only a single polyamine, spermidine. The spermidine content of Buchnera was considerably higher in young aphids and tended to decrease with the age of the host. Expression of speD and speE, whose gene products are key enzymes in the synthesis of spermidine, was analyzed by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. It was shown that the levels of their mRNAs fluctuated in line with the spermidine content.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Buchnera spp. are intracellular symbiotic bacteria harbored by aphid bacteriocytes, cells specifically differentiated for this purpose (1, 3, 15). The symbiotic association between Buchnera and aphids is mutualistic and obligate in that neither partner can reproduce in the absence of the other (11). This is partly because Buchnera produce essential amino acids (6, 7, 20, 26) and vitamins (21), which are utilized by the host aphid. Molecular phylogenetic studies of 16S rRNA genes suggested that Buchnera belong to the gamma  subdivision of the Proteobacteria and that they are closely related to Escherichia coli (32). However, there are significant differences between Buchnera and E. coli. Each Buchnera cell has more than 100 copies of the genome (17), whose size is about a seventh of that of the E. coli genome (4). This suggests that these genomic copies must be stabilized in a specific way in the Buchnera cell. In the meantime, Buchnera cells do not divide as frequently as free-living bacteria, suggesting that their proliferation is strictly controlled by the host bacteriocyte (14). Since polyamines are known to be important factors for DNA stabilization, DNA replication, and cell proliferation, we directed our attention to these polycationic compounds.

Polyamines are linear aliphatic compounds that are positively charged under physiological ionic and pH conditions. They are present in all prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells and account for the majority of intracellular cationic charge (29). Among several functions implicated, charge neutralization of intracellular polyanions, especially DNA, may be the most important physiological role of polyamines. The interaction of polyamines with DNA induces such conformational changes as transitions from B to A and Z forms (30), bending (8), and, at higher polyamine concentrations, condensation of DNA (9, 24, 25). These polyamine-induced conformational changes may affect DNA metabolism and modify the interactions of DNA with sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins (23).

As the first step to investigating the roles of polyamines in Buchnera, in this study, we determined the polyamine composition of Buchnera and further assessed the expression of genes involved in the biosynthesis of polyamines.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Host aphids. A long-established parthenogenetic clone of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris, was maintained on young broad bean plants, Vicia faba L., at 15°C in a long-day regimen of 16 h of light and 8 h of dark (13). Insects were collected within 24 h after larviposition by apterous mothers. These nymphs are described as 0-day aphids. Once the aphids reached adulthood, they were transferred twice a week to fresh plants in order to keep the nutritional conditions constant.

Isolation of Buchnera. The aphids were dissected in a drop of buffer A (35 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 25 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 250 mM sucrose) (13) on a petri dish covered with 1% agarose gel. Bacteriocytes freed from the insect body were collected and gently crushed by pipetting. The homogenate was filtered through an isopore membrane filter (Millipore; pore size, 3 µm) to remove cell components of host origin. This filtration method was verified to give purer samples than other methods, such as the Percoll gradient method (26), and was applied to obtain DNA samples for Buchnera genome analysis (27). Shotgun sequencing of purified DNA detected no contaminant DNAs such as those of eukaryotic mitochondria or other bacteria (S. Shigenobu, personal communication), suggesting that this Buchnera sample was virtually free of contaminants.

Estimation of the volume of Buchnera cells used for HPLC analysis. An aliquot of isolated Buchnera cells was used to estimate the volume of Buchnera applied for high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. The number of Buchnera cells was determined using hemocytometers. The volume of Buchnera cells, treated as spheres, was calculated from the diameter, measured with a micrometer. The sum volume of Buchnera cells was calculated by multiplying the number by the average volume.

E. coli strain. E. coli TOP10 cells were cultured overnight at 37°C in LB medium and collected by centrifugation at the stationary phase.

HPLC analysis. Buchnera and E. coli cells were homogenized in 5% perchloric acid (PCA), and the acid-soluble fractions were obtained by centrifugation at 18,000 × g for 5 min. Supernatants were analyzed in a JASCO HPLC system using a Crestpak C18S column (4.6 by 150 mm) heated to 40°C. Elution was done using a stepwise gradient with solvent A (0.1 M sodium acetate, 10 mM sodium 1-hexanesulfonate [pH 4.5]) and solvent B (methanol). The gradient parameters were as shown in Fig. 1A. The flow rate of the solvents was 1.0 ml/min. Polyamines were detected by fluorescence after mixing the column effluent with an o-phthalaldehyde solution containing 0.06% o-phthalaldehyde, 0.4% borate buffer (pH 10.5), 0.1% Brij 35, and 12 mM 2-mercaptoethanol at 40°C. Fluorescence was measured at an excitation wavelength of 365 nm and an emission wavelength of 455 nm. Quantification was achieved by determining the peak area of the fluorescence tracings and reference to standard curves prepared using polyamine standard solutions.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Analysis of polyamine composition by HPLC. (A) Elution from the reversed-phase column was done using a stepwise gradient with solvent A and solvent B. The gradient parameters are shown as percentages of solvent A. (B) Typical chromatogram of polyamines in Buchnera. (C) Typical chromatogram of polyamines in E. coli. PUT, putrescine; CAD, cadaverine; TYRA, tyramine; AGM, agmatine; SPD, spermidine.

Protein assay. The PCA precipitates were dissolved in 0.1 N NaOH, and their protein contents were assayed using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay reagent (Pierce).

RNA preparation. Total RNA extraction from bacteriocytes was performed using TRIzol reagent (Gibco-BRL). To remove chromosomal DNA contamination, RNA samples were treated with DNase I.

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR. Total RNAs were prepared from bacteriocytes as described above, and the cDNAs were synthesized with 1 µg of total RNA, 1 µl of 200 mM dithiothreitol, and 1 µl of 0.2-µg/µl pd(N)6 primer using the First-Strand cDNA synthesis kit (Pharmacia). PCRs were carried out using reverse-transcribed (RT) samples from the preceding step, 0.2 µM (each) target-specific primers (Table 1) (these primers were designed on the basis of sequence data [GenBank accession number AP000398]), 3 mM MgCl2, and LightCycler-DNA Master SYBR Green I (Roche Diagnostics). To prevent the formation of primer dimers, TaqStart antibody (Clontech) was added to the PCR mixture for the hot start. This antibody keeps the DNA polymerase inactive until the temperature rises above 70°C and is inactivated by the same heating step that denatures the target DNA. A LightCycler (Boehringer Mannheim) instrument was used for real-time quantitative PCR. Temperature parameters for PCR amplification were 95°C for 0 s, 55°C for 5 s, and 72°C for 30 s for 40 cycles. The fluorometric intensity of SYBR Green I, a specific dye for double-stranded DNA, was measured at the end of each elongation phase, and a relative amount of each target cDNA was calculated by kinetic analysis (32). Fluorescence signals caused by primer dimers and nonspecific background were discriminated by melting-curve analysis, as recommended by the manufacturer.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Sequences of the primers used in quantitative RT-PCR


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Cell size of Buchnera. Buchnera cells were isolated from about 20 individuals each of 10-, 20-, 30-, 40-, and 50-day-old adult aphids. The volume of Buchnera cells did not change significantly as the host aphids aged (Table 2).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   Cell size of Buchneraa

Polyamine composition of Buchnera. Irrespective of the age of the host aphids, Buchnera contained virtually only a single polyamine, spermidine (Fig. 1B). Although putrescine and cadaverine are major polyamines in many prokaryotic organisms, no significant amounts of these polyamines were detected in Buchnera. The polyamine composition of E. coli was also examined by the same method (Fig. 1C). In E. coli, considerable amounts of putrescine, spermidine, cadaverine, agmatine, and tyramine were detected, which was consistent with the previous reports (10, 16, 28).

In Fig. 2, we present changes in the spermidine content in terms of the amount per cell (A), per volume (B), and per milligram of protein (C). In each case, spermidine was the most abundant in Buchnera isolated from 10-day-old aphids and amounted to (1.97 ± 0.17) × 10-16 mol/cell, 16.8 ± 3.2 mM, and 49.6 ± 3.7 nmol/mg of protein. According to the value expressed as the amount per cell, each Buchnera cell at day 10 contained about 1.2 × 108 molecules of spermidine, each of which has trivalent positive charges. In the meantime, it has been shown that a Buchnera cell in adult aphids contains about 6.4 × 107 bp of DNA (about 100 copies of the genome, whose size is about 640 kb) (17). This suggests that spermidine amounts sufficient to neutralize the total negative charges of phosphates due to the double-stranded DNA in a Buchnera cell of young aphids are present.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   Spermidine content in Buchnera. Buchnera cells were isolated from about 20 individuals each of 10-, 20-, 30-, 40-, and 50-day-old adult aphids. Spermidine content is presented in terms of the amount per cell (A), per volume (B), and per milligram of protein (C). Each data point is the mean ± standard error of five replicate groups.

It is known that a single cell of E. coli contains 5.6 × 106 molecules of putrescine and 1.1 × 106 molecules of spermidine (22). As the host aphids grew older, the spermidine content in Buchnera decreased (Fig. 2A, B, and C), although the level was still higher than that detected in E. coli (1 to 2 mM).

Quantitative RT-PCR of mRNAs for speD and speE. Total RNAs were extracted from bacteriocytes of 10-, 20-, 30-, 40-, and 50-day-old aphids and reverse transcribed. In the beginning, we quantified 16S rRNA in samples derived from the same amount of total RNAs (Fig. 3A). The amount of 16S rRNA in each age sample was used as an internal standard to calibrate the amounts of mRNAs for speD and speE (each value obtained was divided by the amount of 16S rRNA). Relative amounts of these mRNAs are shown in Fig. 3B and C. The mRNAs for speD and speE were the most abundant in the bacteriocytes isolated from 10-day-old aphids and decreased in amount with the age of the host. These results plausibly account for changes in the amount of spermidine estimated in Fig. 2.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.   Relative amounts of speD and speE mRNAs analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR. Total RNA was prepared from bacteriocytes of aphids at the indicated ages (days). cDNAs were synthesized with pd(N)6 primer using the First-Strand cDNA synthesis kit (Pharmacia) and quantified by PCR amplification with a LightCycler instrument (Boehringer Mannheim). Amounts of target cDNAs in each sample are expressed as a proportion of that in Buchnera from 10-day-old aphids. Each data point is the mean ± standard error of five replicate groups. (A) Relative amount of 16S rRNA. The value of each data point was used for calibration in panels B and C. (B) Relative amount of speD mRNA. (C) Relative amount of speE mRNA.


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The present study revealed that Buchnera contained a large amount of only one polyamine, spermidine. This represented a marked difference in the polyamine composition between Buchnera and E. coli, a bacterium closely related to Buchnera (31). In E. coli, like most other prokaryotes, the most abundant polyamine is putrescine (10, 16, 28), a divalent amine. Spermidine is a trivalent amine with high affinity to DNA and thus, compared with putrescine, much higher activity to stabilize DNA molecules (5, 24, 25). In this context, it is important to consider the cell size and unique genome structure of Buchnera. The cell volume of Buchnera (ca. 10 µm3; Table 2) is about 10 times that of E. coli (0.5 to 1.0 µm3 [19]). Since Buchnera has more than 100 copies of the genome (17), whose size is about a seventh of that of the E. coli genome (4), the total amount of DNA molecules in a Buchnera cell is also about 10 times as great as that of an E. coli cell. Therefore, the DNA volume in Buchnera is roughly similar to that of E. coli, indicating that an extraordinarily large number of circular DNA molecules have to be stabilized in a large Buchnera cell. For this reason, it is conceivable that a unique mechanism for dealing with DNA molecules is needed by Buchnera. A high concentration of spermidine, which is an efficient stabilizer of DNA, in Buchnera can be involved in this mechanism. We also found that the spermidine content decreased with the age of the host aphid. It was demonstrated that the distribution of DNA in the Buchnera cell changes with the age of the host aphid (18). DNA molecules apparently spread uniformly throughout the cell that was isolated from young (18-day) aphids, while the Buchnera cells from middle-aged (30-day) or older (40-day) aphids showed heterogeneous distribution of DNA. These findings may support the hypothesis that spermidine is required to stabilize the large number of DNA molecules in Buchnera cells. However, this does not necessarily mean that all organisms containing large amounts of spermidine have many genomic copies. Spermidine is known as the major polyamine in Bacillus subtilis also, which is a gram-positive bacterium phylogenetically distant from Buchnera (12). In the case of B. subtilis, spermidine is essential for sporulation, which requires compaction of the genomic DNA into a small specialized cell, the spore.

DNA molecules stabilized by spermidine do not form tight aggregates but form highly fluid liquid crystal structures, which cannot be accomplished by inorganic cations or proteins (24). This fluidity enables DNA-binding proteins to get access to DNA molecules, which is prerequisite to gene expression and DNA replication, although it is uncertain whether all the copies of the Buchnera genome function actively. The concentration of spermidine in Buchnera was higher when the host aphids were young, suggesting that this polyamine also plays an important role in DNA replication in Buchnera, since the genomic copy number of Buchnera increases with time when aphids are young (18). This is consistent with the previous reports indicating that an increase in polyamine biosynthesis was required for DNA replication of many other prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells (5, 28).

We examined the expression of the speD and speE genes in Buchnera, whose products are key enzymes in spermidine synthesis. The mRNAs for speD and speE were the most abundant in Buchnera isolated from 10-day-old aphids and decreased with age of the host, which was in line with the change in spermidine content. This finding suggests that spermidine detected in Buchnera (Fig. 2) is synthesized through Buchnera's own metabolism. Whole-genome analysis of Buchnera revealed that this bacterium has no other genes than speD and speE that are involved in the polyamine biosynthetic pathway (28), while E. coli has six of them, speA, speB, speC, speD, speE, and speF (2) (Fig. 4). In other words, Buchnera conserves genes that are essential to synthesize spermidine in spite of a drastic reduction in the genome size, suggesting that spermidine is an indispensable substance for Buchnera. However, it is yet to be answered how Buchnera produces spermidine without the ability to synthesize its precursors, such as agmatine and putrescine. The most probable scenario is that the host provides Buchnera with these precursors. It is already known that Buchnera and host aphids exchange amino acids to meet their metabolic requirements (26, 27). Therefore, it is not farfetched to suppose that host aphids affect the physiology of Buchnera through controlling the supply of polyamine precursors.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.   Biosynthetic pathway of polyamines. In Buchnera, the pathways to synthesize putrescine are absent. The enzymes encoded by the genes are as follows: speA, arginine decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.19); speB, agmatinase (EC 3.5.3.11); speC, ornithine decarboxylase isozyme (EC 4.1.1.17); speD, S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.50); speE, spermidine synthase=putrescine aminopropyl transferase (EC 2.5.1.16); speF, ornithine decarboxylase, inducible (EC 4.1.1.17). Genes present in the Buchnera genome are boxed, while those absent are in parentheses.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Research Fellowships of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists, a grant from the Program for Promotion of Basic Research Activities for Innovation Biosciences (ProBRAIN) of the Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution, and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. Phone: 81-3-5800-3553. Fax: 81-3-5800-3553. E-mail: iskw{at}biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

dagger Present address: Laboratory of Microbiology, RIKEN (The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research), Hirosawa 2-1, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Baumann, P., L. Baumann, C.-Y. Lai, D. Rouhbakhsh, N. A. Moran, and M. A. Clark. 1995. Genetics, physiology, and evolutionary relationships of the genus Buchnera: intracellular symbionts of aphids. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 49:55-94[CrossRef][Medline].
2. Blattner, F. R., G. Plunkett III, C. A. Bloch, N. T. Perna, V. Burland, M. Riley, J. Collado-Vides, J. D. Glasner, C. K. Rode, G. F. Mayhew, J. Gregor, N. W. Davis, H. A. Kirkpatrick, M. A. Goeden, D. J. Rose, B. Mau, and Y. Shao. 1997. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 277:1453-1474[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Buchner, P. 1965. Endosymbiosis of animals with plant microorganisms, p. 297-332. Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, N.Y.
4. Charles, H., and H. Ishikawa. 1999. Physical and genetic map of the genome of Buchnera, the primary endosymbiont of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. J. Mol. Evol. 48:142-150[CrossRef][Medline].
5. Cohen, S. S. 1998. A guide to the polyamines. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, N.Y.
6. Douglas, A. E. 1998. Nutritional interactions in insect-microbial symbioses: aphids and their symbiotic bacteria Buchnera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43:17-37[CrossRef][Medline].
7. Febvay, G., I. Liadouze, J. Guillaud, and G. Bonnot. 1995. Analysis of energetic amino acid metabolism in Acyrthosiphon pisum: a multidimensional approach to amino acid metabolism in aphids. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 29:45-69[CrossRef].
8. Feuerstein, B. G., N. Pattabiraman, and L. J. Marton. 1986. Spermine-DNA interactions: a theoretical study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:5948-5952[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Gosule, L. C., and J. A. Schellmann. 1976. Compact form of DNA induced by spermidine. Nature 259:333-335[CrossRef][Medline].
10. Hamana, K. 1996. Distribution of diaminopropane and acetylspermidine in Enterobacteriaceae. Can. J. Microbiol. 42:107-114[Medline].
11. Houk, E. J., and G. W. Griffiths. 1980. Intracellular symbiotes of the homoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 25:161-187[CrossRef].
12. Ishii, I., H. Takada, K. Terao, T. Kakegawa, K. Igarashi, and S. Hirose. 1994. Decrease in spermidine content during logarithmic phase of cell growth delays spore formation of Bacillus subtilis. Cell. Mol. Biol. 40:925-931.
13. Ishikawa, H. 1982. Host-symbiont interactions in the protein synthesis in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Insect Biochem. 12:613-622[CrossRef].
14. Ishikawa, H. 1984. Control of macromolecule synthesis in the aphid endosymbiont by the host insect. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 78B:51-57[CrossRef].
15. Ishikawa, H. 1989. Biochemical and molecular aspects of endosymbiosis in insects. Int. Rev. Cytol. 116:1-45[Medline].
16. Kashiwagi, K., and K. Igarashi. 1988. Adjustment of polyamine contents in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 170:3131-3135[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17. Komaki, K., and H. Ishikawa. 1999. Intracellular bacterial symbionts of aphids possess many genomic copies per bacterium. J. Mol. Evol. 48:717-722[CrossRef][Medline].
18. Komaki, K., and H. Ishikawa. 2000. Genomic copy number of intracellular bacterial symbionts of aphids varies in response to developmental stage and morph of their host. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 30:253-258[CrossRef][Medline].
19. Mongold, J. A., and R. E. Lenski. 1996. Experimental rejection of a nonadaptive explanation for increased cell size in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 178:5333-5334[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20. Nakabachi, A., and H. Ishikawa. 1997. Differential display of mRNAs related to amino acid metabolism in the endosymbiotic system of aphids. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 27:1057-1062[CrossRef][Medline].
21. Nakabachi, A., and H. Ishikawa. 1999. Provision of riboflavin to the host aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, by endosymbiotic bacteria, Buchnera. J. Insect Physiol. 45:1-6[CrossRef][Medline].
22. Neidhardt, F. C., R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.). 1996. Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
23. Panagiotidis, C. A., S. Artandi, K. Calame, and S. J. Silverstein. 1995. Polyamines alter sequence-specific DNA-protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:1800-1809[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24. Pelta, J., F. Livolant, and J.-L. Sikorav. 1996. DNA aggregation induced by polyamines and cobalthexamine. J. Biol. Chem. 271:5656-5662[Abstract/Free Full Text].
25. Saminathan, M., T. Antony, A. Shirahata, L. H. Sigal, T. Thomas, and T. J. Thomas. 1999. Ionic and structural specificity effects of natural and synthetic polyamines on the aggregation and resolubilization of single-, double-, and triple-stranded DNA. Biochemistry 38:3821-3830[CrossRef][Medline].
26. Sasaki, T., and H. Ishikawa. 1995. Production of essential amino acids from glutamate by mycetocyte symbionts of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. J. Insect Physiol. 41:41-46.
27. Shigenobu, S., H. Watanabe, M. Hattori, Y. Sakaki, and H. Ishikawa. Mutualism as revealed at the genomic level: the whole genome sequence of Buchnera sp. APS, an endocellular bacterial symbiont of aphids. Nature, in press.
28. Tabor, C. W., and H. Tabor. 1964. Spermidine, spermine, and related amines. Pharmacol. Rev. 16:245-300[Free Full Text].
29. Tabor, C. W., and H. Tabor. 1984. Polyamines. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 53:749-790[CrossRef][Medline].
30. Thomas, T. J., U. B. Gunnia, and T. Thomas. 1991. Polyamine-induced B-DNA to Z-DNA conformational transition of a plasmid DNA with (dG-dC)n insert. J. Biol. Chem. 266:6137-6141[Abstract/Free Full Text].
31. Unterman, B. M., P. Baumann, and D. L. McLean. 1989. Pea aphid symbiont relationships established by analysis of 16S rRNAs. J. Bacteriol. 171:2970-2974[Abstract/Free Full Text].
32. Wittwer, C. T., M. G. Herrmann, A. A. Moss, and R. P. Rasmussen. 1997. Continuous fluorescence monitoring of rapid cycle DNA amplification. BioTechniques 22:130-138[Medline].


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2000, p. 3305-3309, Vol. 66, No. 8
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakabachi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ishikawa, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakabachi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ishikawa, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nakabachi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ishikawa, H.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals