Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2000, p. 3350-3356, Vol. 66, No. 8
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparative Characterization of Complete and Truncated Forms
of Lactobacillus amylovorus
-Amylase and Role of the
C-Terminal Direct Repeats in Raw-Starch Binding
R.
Rodriguez Sanoja,1
J.
Morlon-Guyot,1,*
J.
Jore,2
J.
Pintado,1
N.
Juge,3 and
J. P.
Guyot1
Laboratoire de Biotechnologie Microbienne
Tropicale, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, 34032 Montpellier cedex 1, France1; TNO
VOEDING, Dept. AMGT, 3700 AJ Zeist, The
Netherlands2; and Institute of Food
Research, Norwich Research Park, Obrey, Norwich NR4 7UA, United
Kingdom3
Received 6 March 2000/Accepted 3 May 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Two constructs derived from the
-amylase gene (amyA)
of Lactobacillus amylovorus were expressed in
Lactobacillus plantarum, and their expression products were
purified, characterized, and compared. These products correspond to the
complete (AmyA) and truncated (AmyA
) forms of
-amylase; AmyA
lacks the 66-kDa carboxyl-terminal direct-repeating-unit region. AmyA
and AmyA
exhibit similar amylase activities towards a range of
soluble substrates (amylose, amylopectin and
-cyclodextrin, and
soluble starch). The specific activities of the enzymes towards soluble
starch are similar, but the KM and
Vmax values of AmyA
were slightly higher
than those of AmyA, whereas the thermal stability of AmyA
was lower
than that of AmyA. In contrast to AmyA, AmyA
is unable to bind to
-cyclodextrin and is only weakly active towards glycogen. More
striking is the fact that AmyA
cannot bind or hydrolyze raw starch,
demonstrating that the carboxyl-terminal repeating-unit domain of AmyA
is required for raw-starch binding activity.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Raw-starch-degrading amylases are
commercially important enzymes in the beverage, food, and textile
industries (13). Starch is commonly used as a renewable raw
material for the industrial production of lactic acid (6).
The amylolytic lactic acid bacteria are attractive alternatives for
this type of process, since they can directly produce lactic acid from
starch (37, 38). Various Lactobacillus strains
exhibit amylase activity: Lactobacillus cellobiosus
(32), Lactobacillus amylovorus (26),
Lactobacillus amylophilus (27),
Lactobacillus plantarum (10, 30),
Lactobacillus manihotivorans (24), and
Lactobacillus amylolyticus (2). The
-amylase
genes of L. plantarum A6 (12), L. amylovorus (12), and L. manihotivorans (J. Morlon-Guyot, I. Jacobé, de Haut, J. Boniface, and J. P. Guyot, Abstr. Aff. VI4, 9ème Colloque Club Bact. Lact., 1998)
have been sequenced. These lactobacillus amyA genes have
more than 98% nucleotide sequence identity and a similar level of
identity for the deduced amino acid sequence (Morlon-Guyot et al.,
Abstr. Aff. VI4, 9ème Colloque Club Bact. Lact., 1998). With such
high homologies, it is assumed that the three enzymes possess similar
structure-function relationships. It has been demonstrated that the
first 410 amino acids of L. amylovorus are sufficient to
transfer an amylolytic activity to a nonamylolytic strain of L. plantarum (17), suggesting that the N-terminal parts of
these enzymes contains the active site. The 3'-terminal halves of the
three genes exhibit a special tandem repeated-unit structure
(12; Morlon-Guyot et al., Abstr. Aff., VI4,
9ème Colloque Club Bact. Lact., 1998) whose role is still
unknown. Giraud and Cuny (12) suggested that the region of
repeated sequences might be responsible for raw-starch binding. A
recent study showed that some proteolytic fragments of the L. plantarum A6 amylase lose the raw-starch-digesting ability
(9), but their positions in the primary structure were not
determined. In the present work, the functional role of the
carboxyl-terminal repeat sequences of the L. amylovorus
amylase (AmyA) is investigated using clones encoding either the entire
AmyA or the truncated amylase AmyA
, which has the repeated sequences
deleted (17). Comparison of the enzymatic properties of the
two amylases reveals that the C-terminal part of the enzyme containing
the repeated sequences is involved in the ability of this enzyme to
bind to raw starch.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Material.
Soluble potato starch, calcium carbonate,
dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS), and glucose were from Prolabo, Paris,
France. Raw corn starch, pullulan maltose, amylose (type III from
potato), amylopectin (from corn), glycogen (from mussels), and
-,
-, and
-cyclodextrins were from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis,
Mo.). Sepharose was from Pharmacia Biotech (Uppsala, Sweden).
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and culture conditions.
L.
plantarum LMG9211 was from the Laboratorium voor Microbiologie
Universiteit Gent (Ghent, Belgium) culture collection. Plasmids pLPCR2-3 carrying the 5.5-kb amyA gene from L. amylovorus and pLPCR2-3
B/X carrying the 4.0-kb truncated
amyA gene were constructed as described previously
(17). MRS medium (7) was used to grow the
lactobacillus strains at 30°C. This medium was first made without
glucose, and, depending on the experiments, the carbon source added was
either 1% (wt/vol) glucose, maltose, or soluble or raw starch, with or
without 4% calcium carbonate. For enzyme preparation, cultures were
grown in a 2-liter bioreactor (Biolafitte, Poissy, France) at 30°C
and agitated at 300 rpm. The pH was maintained at 6.0 by automatic
addition of 5 N NaOH.
Transformation of L. plantarum and selection of
transformants.
Plasmids pLPCR2-3 and pLPCR2-3
B/X (Fig.
1) were introduced into L. plantarum LMG9211 by electroporation, as described previously (32). The transformants were selected by adding erythromycin (2.5 µg/ml) to the solid culture medium. The production of
-amylase by the recombinant clones was detected by visualization of
halos due to starch degradation on 1% starch-containing plates after staining them with iodine vapors.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Restriction map of pLPCR2-3 and pLPCR2-3 B/X plasmids.
(A) pLPCR2-3 plasmid, carrying the 2.8-kb amyA gene of
L. amylovorus, ligated at the BglII site of the
pLPCR2 plasmid (dashed line). (B) pLPCR2-3 B/X plasmid derived from
pLPCR2-3 after deletion of the 2-kb BamHI-XhoI
fragment.
|
|
Enzyme purification.
Following an 18-h batch culture, the
fermentation broth was collected and centrifuged at 9,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C.
The intact
L. amylovorus 
-amylase was purified from
L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3) supernatant by affinity
chromatography as described
previously (
34), using a

-cyclodextrin-epoxy-activated Sepharose
6B column (16 by 35 mm).
After being washed with 0.1 M citrate-phosphate
buffer, pH 5.5, the
bound amylase was eluted with

-cyclodextrin
(8 mM) in the same
buffer at a flow rate of 0.5 ml · min
1 for 400
min.
The truncated amylase from
L. amylovorus was purified from
L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3

B/X) supernatant.
(NH
4)
2SO
4 was added to
the
clarified culture to 70% saturation, and the precipitate was
collected
by centrifugation (15,000 ×
g for 15 min at 4°C),
resuspended
in 50 ml of 0.05 M citrate-phosphate buffer (pH 5.5),
concentrated
by ultrafiltration (10,000-Da cutoff [Amicon;
Millipore]) and
loaded onto a Protein Pak 200SW gel exclusion column
(8 by 300
mm; Waters). The enzyme-containing fractions were pooled and
concentrated
(Microcon centrifugal device YM-10 [Amicon; Millipore]).
Electrophoresis analyses.
Sodium dodecyl sulfate-7.5%
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-7.5% PAGE) was performed
according to the method of Laemmli (19). Proteins were
visualized by Coomassie blue staining as described by Blakesly and
Boezi (1). Activity staining was performed in the gel after
renaturation of the enzymes, using the method described by Lacks and
Springhorn (18).
Enzyme activity assay.
Routine
-amylase activity assay
was used to determine the activity of
-amylase in the fractions
collected throughout the purification. The activity of
-amylase
towards soluble potato starch was determined by measurement of its
iodine-complexing ability, using the protocol described by Giraud et
al. (11) with minor modifications: enzyme incubation was
performed at pH 5.0 and 63°C. One enzyme unit is defined as the
amount of enzyme that permits the hydrolysis of 10 mg of soluble starch
over 30 min.
For enzymatic characterization of the recombinant enzymes, amylase
activity was determined by measuring the increase of reducing
sugar
formed by the enzymatic hydrolysis of 1% soluble potato
starch or
other substrates (

-,

-, and

-cyclodextrins, amylopectin,
amylose, glycogen, maltose, pullulan, and raw corn starch). The
reducing sugars were quantified by the DNS method using glucose
as a
standard (
22) at pH 5.0 and 63°C. One unit of amylase
activity
was defined as the amount of enzyme which liberated 1 µmol
of
reducing sugars per min. The protein concentration was estimated
by
the method of Bradford (
4), using bovine serum albumin as
a
standard (Bio-Rad [Richmond, Calif.] protein
assay).
The apparent Michaelis constant (
KM) of each
enzyme was determined at 10 different concentrations of soluble starch
(from
0 to 20 g/liter) at their temperature and pH optima. Kinetic
parameters
were calculated by fitting initial velocities and substrate
concentrations
to the Michaelis-Menten equation using the quasi-Newton
minimization
method (Microsoft Excel, version
5).
Effects of pH and temperature.
The amylase activity was
determined at various pH values (ranging from 3 to 7) and at various
temperatures (from 45 to 75°C) in 0.1 M citrate-phosphate buffer. A
second-order factorial design was used (3, 25) in order to
study the combined effect of pH and temperature on amylase activity.
To determine the thermostabilities of the recombinant enzymes, samples
were preincubated in 0.1 M citrate-phosphate buffer
at optimum pH and
at several temperatures (from 35 to 75°C) for
various times (from 0 to 2 h). The samples were then chilled on
ice for at least 30 min,
and the residual activity was determined
at pH 5.0 and 63°C, using
the DNS method as described
above.
Adsorption of
-amylase on raw starch.
Various amounts
(from 0 to 140 µg/ml) of recombinant enzyme (AmyA or AmyA
) were
added to a raw-corn-starch suspension (10 mg/ml) in 0.1 M
citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 5, to a final volume of 60 µl. The
mixture was incubated at 4°C for 30 min under gentle shaking (6 rpm)
and centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 5 min. The protein concentration in the supernatant was assayed, and the amount of adsorbed enzyme was calculated by subtraction (35).
Adsorption constants (Kad [in milliliters per
milligram of starch]) were calculated from the slopes obtained from
the linear adsorption using 10 initial concentrations of purified
enzyme (5).
SEM.
Samples were prepared from L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3) and L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3
B/X)
cultures incubated for various times (up to 48 h) with 1% raw
starch. The samples were then centrifuged, and the resulting pellets
were lyophilized and submitted to homogenous gold metallization. SEM
examination was performed using a JEOL JSM-6300F microscope (Montpellier).
 |
RESULTS |
Amylase production.
-Amylase constructs (Fig. 1) were
transferred by electroporation into L. plantarum LMG9211,
and the resulting transformants, L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3) and
L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3
B/X), were tested for the production
of
-amylase in the medium. Recombinant clones from both
transformants formed halos on starch-containing plates, which indicate
secretion of active
-amylase (data not shown). In order to select
transformants with the best amylase secretion efficiencies, L. plantarum transformants were grown for 24 h on various
carbon sources, using L. plantarum LMG9211 as a
negative control. The recombinant transformants displayed
comparable growth rates in all media tested. The cultures were
harvested in the late logarithmic growth phase (optical density at 600 nm, 2), and amylolytic activities on soluble starch were measured in
the supernatant. Amylase produced by the L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3
B/X) recombinant strain was found to be
secreted at a much higher yield (from 2- to 15-fold, depending on the
carbon source) than that produced by L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3)
(Table 1). The carbon source had an
effect on the amylase production of L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3): the highest amylolytic activity was obtained using soluble starch as a
carbon source, while glucose decreased amylase production (from 1.5- to
8.5-fold, depending on the carbon source to which it is compared). Such
an effect was not observed with the L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3
B/X) transformant, which exhibited the
same level of
-amylase activity independent of the carbon
source. For both recombinant strains, the presence of calcium carbonate
in the growth medium slightly increased amylase production, except for
the transformants grown on soluble starch, where the effect was
negligible.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Levels of -amylase activity in the culture
supernatants of L. plantarum strains in response to
medium compositiona
|
|
Purification of the recombinant AmyA and AmyA
amylases.
The
amylase (AmyA) produced by the L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3)
transformant (grown on soluble starch) was purified from the culture supernatant by affinity chromatography on
-cyclodextrin-Sepharose. The elution pattern showed a unique peak of protein which was superimposable on the amylase activity of the enzyme. The recombinant enzyme, purified to homogeneity, migrated as a single band on SDS-PAGE
which was active on the zymogram (data not shown). Thus, using a single
chromatography step, about 75-fold purification was obtained with a
yield of 69% (Table 2).
Since the amylase (AmyA

) produced by
L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3

B/X) was not retained on

-cyclodextrin-Sepharose, a different
purification strategy was
undertaken. Following ammonium sulfate
precipitation and concentration
by ultrafiltration, the enzyme
preparation was separated by gel
filtration chromatography (Table
2). Using this procedure, the enzyme
was purified about 60-fold,
with a yield of 3%, and showed a single
band on SDS-PAGE and the
zymogram (data not
shown).
The apparent molecular mass of the purified amylases deduced from the
gel analysis was 127 kDa, and it was 59 kDa for AmyA
and AmyA

.
The specific activities of the enzymes on soluble starch were similar:
4,076 U · mg
1 for AmyA and 3,511 U · mg
1 for AmyA

.
Effects of temperature and pH.
Response surfaces of AmyA and
AmyA
amylase activities as a function of pH and temperature are
shown in Fig. 2. AmyA showed optimal
activity at pH 5.0 and 62°C, whereas AmyA
had optimal activity at
pH 4.8 and 64°C. A given percentage of AmyA activity was maintained
over a broader range of temperatures than was AmyA
activity; as an
example, a minimum of 80% of optimum activity was obtained between 47 and 75°C for AmyA, whereas for AmyA
, the same percentage was
observed between 59 and 69°C.
The thermostabilities of the enzymes were similar at temperatures below
65°C. However, at 65°C, the activity of AmyA

was
totally lost
after 120 min, whereas AmyA still exhibited about
40% of its optimum
activity (Fig.
3). At higher
temperatures,
AmyA activity decreased less rapidly than that of
AmyA

. AmyA
thus exhibited higher thermostability than AmyA

.
Substrate specificity.
AmyA and AmyA
relative activities
towards various polysaccharide substrates were tested (Table
3). For both enzymes, the best
hydrolyzing substrates were found to be amylopectin, soluble starch,
and
-cyclodextrin, while amylose was hydrolyzed at a lower rate.
Both enzymes were unable to hydrolyze either pullulan or
- and
-cyclodextrins. With glycogen, a relatively high activity was
observed with AmyA, whereas it was very low with AmyA
. AmyA was
active towards raw starch, while AmyA
was unable to hydrolyze it.
The affinities of both enzymes for soluble starch were determined at
their pH and temperature optima. Both amylases followed
a typical
Michaelis-type kinetic. The apparent
KM and
Vmax values
for AmyA were 3 mg · ml
1 and 0.13 µmol · ml
1 · s
1 (equivalent to a
kcat of 5,652 s
1), respectively, while AmyA

had a
KM of 4 mg · ml
1 and a
Vmax of 0.20 µmol · ml
1 · s
1 (equivalent to a
kcat of 3,878 s
1).
Ability to bind to raw starch.
Adsorption of AmyA and AmyA
to raw-starch granules was assayed at various protein concentrations
(5). As shown in Fig. 4, AmyA
was adsorbed to raw starch whereas AmyA
was unable to bind to it.
For AmyA, the Kad (see Material and Methods) was
0.26 ml of protein suspension per mg of raw starch, and the curve
reached a plateau when 30 µg of protein was bound to 1 mg of raw
starch, indicating limited availability or accessibility of raw starch for the enzyme. This maximum is reached when the protein forms a
monolayer on the starch surface (35).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Adsorption of AmyA ( ) and AmyA ( ) on raw
starch. The linear adsorption isotherms indicate the apparent
equilibrium distribution of enzymes between the solid phase (bound
protein) and the liquid phase (unbound protein) at various protein
concentrations.
|
|
SEM observation of raw-starch granules after fermentation with the
recombinant L. plantarum strains.
Enzymatic attack on
raw-starch granules was observed by SEM during fermentation. In each
fermentation sample, the aspects of starch granules were relatively
homogenous (Fig. 5A, C, and D). When the
fermentation was carried out with L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3
B/X), the initially smooth granules (Fig. 5A
and B) did not show any measurable degradation after 24 (Fig. 5C and E)
or 48 (Fig. 5G) h. In contrast, the starch granules became rougher and
perforated after 24 h when fermentation was carried out with
L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3) (Fig. 5D and F). After 48 h of
fermentation with this transformant, many starch granules displayed
large cavities, and their lamellar organization could be observed (Fig.
5H).

View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Scanning electron micrographs showing the effects of
-amylases produced by recombinant L. plantarum strains on
raw corn starch granules after fermentation. Shown are native raw
starch (A and B) and raw-starch granules after 24 (C and E) or 48 (G) h
of fermentation with L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3 B/X) and after
24 (D and F) or 48 (H) h of fermentation with L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Expression and secretion.
Since L. plantarum is
easily electroporable (31) and had already been used for
efficient L. amylovorus
-amylase gene expression and
secretion (8, 17), it was chosen as the host for
transformation of the two
-amylase constructs, pLPCR2-3 and
pLPCR2-3
B/X. Despite identical promoter and signal sequences,
AmyA
was expressed at a higher level of amylase than AmyA. This
variation in amylase production could be due to a difference in plasmid
copy number among the transformants or to the folding of the
recombinant protein.
One form of catabolite repression in the gram-positive bacteria is
mediated by the
cis-acting catabolite responsive element
(
cre) and a
trans-acting repressor protein
(
14). A putative
cre sequence has been identified
in the three
Lactobacillus amyA genes which have been
sequenced so far (
12; Morlon-Guyot et
al., Abstr.
Aff. VI4 9ème Colloque Club Bact. Lact., 1998), and
it is
therefore postulated that the carbon source should have
an effect on
the amylase production of these strains. Despite
the presence of this
sequence in both AmyA and AmyA

constructs,
the carbon source had an
effect only on amylase produced by
L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3)
and not on amylase produced by
L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3

B/X).
As suggested above, if the copy number of the plasmid pLPCR2-3

B/X
is
high, the number of
cre sequences would be higher than the
number of available repressor molecules and might therefore prevent
their
titration.
Enzymatic activities.
AmyA
specific activity was very
similar to that of AmyA on all substrates tested. These data are in
agreement with those obtained previously with AmyA and AmyA
on
soluble starch (17), suggesting that the C-terminal part of
the amylase is not involved in the activity of the enzyme. These data
also suggest that the truncated amylase folds correctly, as already
shown for Bacillus stearothermophilus and Bacillus
subtilis C-terminally truncated amylases (28, 33).
However, AmyA
showed lower activity for soluble starch, with
one-third-fold increase in KM and one-third decrease in kcat compared to AmyA, indicating
altered substrate binding in AmyA
. A similar effect of C-terminal
truncation was observed with the B. stearothermophilus
amylase (33).
AmyA was found to be slightly more thermostable than AmyA

. It is
therefore suggested that the C terminus of AmyA plays a
positive role
in the thermostability of the enzyme by maintaining
the intact
conformation of the enzyme. These results are in agreement
with those
previously observed with the amylases from
Cryptococcus sp.
strain S-2 (
15) but are different from those obtained with
the amylases from
Bacillus (
28,
33), for which
the carboxyl-terminally
truncated enzymes were more thermostable than
the entire
enzymes.
Surprisingly, AmyA

was almost unable to hydrolyze glycogen but was
active towards amylopectin, whose structure is similar
to that of
glycogen. These data could be explained by the fact
that in contrast to
glycogen, amylopectin is often contaminated
with small
oligosaccharides, which were used as substrates for
AmyA

.
Binding to raw starch.
Only weak amylolytic activity was
obtained in the culture supernatant of L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3) grown in the presence of raw starch compared
to that obtained with L. plantarum(pLPCR2-3
B/X) on the
same medium. These data can be explained by the fact that the
intact amylase (AmyA) was adsorbed on raw starch whereas AmyA
was
not retained on raw starch and was thus totally recovered in the supernatant.
As has been demonstrated by Leloup et al. (
20), enzyme
adsorption is the limiting parameter of hydrolysis. The method used
in
this work for measuring the adsorption of the enzyme to raw
starch
clearly separates raw-starch binding ability from enzymatic
activity.
Under these conditions, AmyA bound raw starch whereas
AmyA

could not
bind to it. Taken together, these results demonstrate
the existence in
AmyA of a C-terminal region affecting binding
to raw starch. Some
amylases have been shown to contain a starch
binding domain located at
the C terminus of the enzyme (for a
review, see reference
16), but structurally different from the
repeat unit
structure characteristic of the
Lactobacillus amylases.
The
role of the C-terminal repeat unit regions in ligand binding
has also
been demonstrated in other proteins (for reviews, see
references
21,
23,
29, and
36), but this is
the first
report of such a role in the amylase
family.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
R. Rodriguez was supported by a personal grant from the Conacyt
(Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Technologia) Mexico.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: I.R.D. (ORSTOM),
Laboratoire de Biotechnologie Microbienne Tropicale (LBMT), BP 5045, 34032 Montpellier cedex 1, France. Phone: 33 4 67 41 62 78. Fax: 33 4 67 54 78 00. E-mail:
Juliette.Morlon-Guyot{at}mpl.ird.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Blakesly, R. W., and J. A. Boezi.
1977.
A new staining technique for protein in polyacrylamide gels using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250.
Anal. Biochem.
82:580-582[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bohak, I.,
W. Back,
L. Richter,
M. Eirman,
W. Ludwig, and K. H. Schleifer.
1998.
Lactobacillus amylolyticus sp. nov., isolated from beer malt and beer wort.
Syst. Appl. Microbiol.
21:360-364[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Box, G. E. P.,
W. G. Hunter, and J. S. Hunter.
1978.
Statistics for experimenters: an introduction to design, data analysis, and model building.
John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 4.
|
Bradford, M. M.
1976.
A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.
Anal. Biochem.
72:248-254[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Chen, L.,
P. M. Coutinho,
Z. Nikolov, and C. Ford.
1995.
Deletions analysis of the starch-binding domain of Aspergillus glucoamylase.
Protein Eng.
8:1049-1055[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Cheng, P.,
R. E. Mueller,
S. Jaeger,
R. Bajpai, and E. L. Iannotti.
1991.
Lactic acid production from enzyme-thinned corn starch using Lactobacillus amylovorus.
J. Ind. Microbiol.
7:27-34.
|
| 7.
|
De Man, J. C.,
M. Rogosa, and M. E. Sharpe.
1960.
A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
23:130-135.
|
| 8.
|
Fitzsimmons, A.,
P. Hols,
J. Jore,
R. J. Leer,
M. O'Connell, and J. Delcour.
1994.
Development of an amylolytic Lactobacillus plantarum silage strain expressing the Lactobacillus amylovorus -amylase gene.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
60:3529-3535[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
| Florencio, J. A., M. Raimbault, J. P. Guyot,
D. R. Eiras-Stofella, C. R. Soccol, and J. D. Fontana. Lactobacillus plantarum amylase acting on
crude starch granules: native isoforms and activity changes after
limited proteolysis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., in press.
|
| 10.
|
Giraud, E.,
A. Brauman,
S. Keleke,
B. Lelong, and M. Raimbault.
1991.
Isolation and physiological study of an amylolytic strain of Lactobacillus plantarum.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
36:379-383.
|
| 11.
|
Giraud, E.,
L. Gosselin,
B. Marin,
J. L. Parada, and M. Raimbault.
1993.
Purification and characterization of an extracellular amylase activity from Lactobacillus plantarum strain A6.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
75:276-282.
|
| 12.
|
Giraud, E., and G. Cuny.
1997.
Molecular characterization of the -amylase genes of Lactobacillus plantarum A6 and Lactobacillus amylovorus reveals an unusual 3' end structure with direct tandem repeats and suggests a common evolutionary origin.
Gene
198:149-157[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Glazer, A. N., and H. Nikado.
1994.
Microbial Biotechnology. W. H.
Freeman and Co., New York, N.Y.
|
| 14.
|
Hueck, C. J., and W. Hillen.
1995.
Catabolite repression in Bacillus subtilis, a global regulatory mechanism for the gram-positive bacteria?
Mol. Microbiol.
15:395-401[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Iefuji, H.,
M. Chino,
M. Kato, and Y. Iimura.
1996.
Raw-starch-digesting and thermostable -amylase from the yeast Cryptococcus sp. S-2: purification, characterization, cloning and sequencing.
Biochem. J.
318:989-996.
|
| 16.
|
Janecek, S., and J. Sevcik.
1999.
The evolution of starch-binding domain.
FEBS Lett.
456:119-125[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Jore, J. P. M., and J. De Parasis.
1993.
Studies on the -amylase of Lactobacillus amylovorus as a model for heterologous protein secretion by lactobacilli.
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
12:26.
|
| 18.
|
Lacks, S. A., and S. S. Springhorn.
1980.
Renaturation of enzymes after polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate.
J. Biol. Chem.
225:7467-7473.
|
| 19.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
1970.
Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.
Nature
227:680-685[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Leloup, V. M.,
P. Colonna, and S. G. Ring.
1991.
-Amylase adsorption on starch crystallites.
Biotechnol. Bioeng.
38:127-134[CrossRef].
|
| 21.
|
Lemaire, M., and P. Beguin.
1993.
Nucleotide sequence of the celG gene of Clostridium thermocellum and characterization of its product, endoglucanase CelG.
J. Bacteriol.
175:3353-3356[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Miller, G. L.
1959.
Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar.
Anal. Chem.
31:426-428[CrossRef].
|
| 23.
|
Monchois, V.,
A. Reverte,
M. Remaud-Simeon,
P. Monsan, and R. M. Willemot.
1998.
Effect of Leuconostoc mesenteroides NRRL B-512F dextransucrase carboxy-terminal deletions on dextran and oligosaccharide synthesis.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:1644-1649[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Morlon-Guyot, J.,
J. P. Guyot,
B. Pot,
I. Jacobe de Haut, and M. Raimbault.
1998.
Lactobacillus manihotivorans sp. nov., a new starch-hydrolyzing lactic acid bacterium isolated from cassava sour starch fermentation.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
48:1101-1109[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Murado, M. A.,
I. G. Siso,
P. Gonzalez,
I. Montemayor,
L. Pastrana, and J. Pintado.
1993.
Characterization of microbial biomasses and amylolytic preparations obtained from mussel processing waste treatment.
Bioresour. Technol.
43:117-125[CrossRef].
|
| 26.
|
Nakamura, L. K.
1981.
Lactobacillus amylovorus, a new starch-hydrolyzing species from cattle waste corn fermentation.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
31:56-63.
|
| 27.
|
Nakamura, L. K., and C. D. Crowell.
1979.
Lactobacillus amylovorus, a new starch-hydrolysing species from swine waste-corn fermentation.
Dev. Ind. Microbiol.
20:535-540.
|
| 28.
|
Ohdan, K.,
T. Kuriki,
H. Kaneko,
J. Shimada,
T. Takada,
Z. Fujimoto,
H. Mizuno, and S. Okada.
1999.
Characteristics of two forms of -amylases and structural implication.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:4652-4658[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Ohura, T.,
K. I. Kasuya, and Y. Doi.
1999.
Cloning and characterization of the polyhydroxybutyrate depolymerase gene of Pseudomonas stutzeri and analysis of the function of substrate binding domains.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:189-197[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Olympia, M.,
H. Fukuda,
H. Ono,
Y. Kaneko, and M. Takano.
1995.
Characterisation of starch hydrolyzing Lactic Acid Bacteria isolated from a fermented fish and rice food Burong Isda and its amylolytic enzyme.
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
80:124-130[CrossRef].
|
| 31.
|
Rodriguez, S. R.,
J. Morlon-Guyot, and J. P. Guyot.
1999.
Electrotransformation of Lactobacillus manihotivorans LMG 18010T and LMG 18011.
J. Appl. Microbiol.
87:99-107[CrossRef].
|
| 32.
|
Sen, S., and S. L. Chakrabarty.
1986.
Amylase from Lactobacillus cellobiosus D-39 isolated from vegetable wastes; purification and characterisation.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
60:419-423.
|
| 33.
|
Vihinen, M.,
T. Peltonen,
A. Litia,
I. Suominen, and P. Mantsala.
1994.
C-terminal truncations of thermostable Bacillus stearothermophilus -amylase.
Protein Eng.
7:1255-1259[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Vretblad, P.
1974.
Immobilization of ligands for biospecific affinity chromatography via their hydroxyl groups. Their cyclo-hexaamylose- -amylase system.
FEBS Lett.
47:86-89[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Williamson, G.,
N. J. Belshaw, and M. P. Williamson.
1992.
O-Glycosylation in Aspergillus glucoamylase.
Biochem. J.
282:423-428.
|
| 36.
|
Wren, B. W.
1991.
A family of clostridial and streptococcal ligand-binding proteins with conserved C-terminal repeat sequences.
Mol. Microbiol.
5:797-803[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Xiaodong, W.,
G. Xuan, and S. K. Rakhit.
1997.
Direct fermentative production of lactic acid on cassava and other starch substrates.
Biotechnol. Lett.
19:841-843[CrossRef].
|
| 38.
|
Zhang, D. X., and M. Cheryan.
1994.
Starch to lactic acid in a continuous membrane bioreactor.
Processes Biochem.
29:145-150.
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2000, p. 3350-3356, Vol. 66, No. 8
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Guillen, D., Santiago, M., Linares, L., Perez, R., Morlon, J., Ruiz, B., Sanchez, S., Rodriguez-Sanoja, R.
(2007). Alpha-Amylase Starch Binding Domains: Cooperative Effects of Binding to Starch Granules of Multiple Tandemly Arranged Domains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
73: 3833-3837
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ramsay, A. G., Scott, K. P., Martin, J. C., Rincon, M. T., Flint, H. J.
(2006). Cell-associated {alpha}-amylases of butyrate-producing Firmicute bacteria from the human colon.. Microbiology
152: 3281-3290
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rodriguez-Sanoja, R., Ruiz, B., Guyot, J. P., Sanchez, S.
(2005). Starch-Binding Domain Affects Catalysis in Two Lactobacillus {alpha}-Amylases. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 297-302
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shigechi, H., Koh, J., Fujita, Y., Matsumoto, T., Bito, Y., Ueda, M., Satoh, E., Fukuda, H., Kondo, A.
(2004). Direct Production of Ethanol from Raw Corn Starch via Fermentation by Use of a Novel Surface-Engineered Yeast Strain Codisplaying Glucoamylase and {alpha}-Amylase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
70: 5037-5040
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shiau, R.-J., Hung, H.-C., Jeang, C.-L.
(2003). Improving the Thermostability of Raw-Starch-Digesting Amylase from a Cytophaga sp. by Site-Directed Mutagenesis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 2383-2385
[Abstract]
[Full Text]