This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dunfield, P. F. Articles by Conrad, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dunfield, P. F. Articles by Conrad, R. Agricola Articles by Dunfield, P. F. Articles by Conrad, R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2000, p. 4136-4138, Vol. 66, No. 9
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Starvation Alters the Apparent Half-Saturation Constant for Methane in the Type II Methanotroph Methylocystis Strain LR1

Max-Planck-Institut für terrestrische Mikrobiologie, Karl-von-Frisch Strasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany

Received 5 May 2000/Accepted 30 June 2000

	ABSTRACT

Top Abstract Text References

When cells of a type II methanotrophic bacterium (Methylocystis strain LR1) were starved of methane, both the K_m(app) and the V_max(app) for methane decreased. The specific affinity (a^o_s) remained nearly constant. Therefore, the decreased K_m(app) in starved cells was probably not an adjustment to better utilize low-methane concentrations.

	TEXT

Top Abstract Text References

Microbial oxidation of atmospheric methane (CH₄) takes place in most aerobic upland soils (5, 10). Because these soils exhibit a lower half-saturation constant [K_m(app)] for CH₄ than do pure cultures of methanotrophic bacteria, it has been postulated that the active bacteria are unknown species. These have been popularly dubbed "high-affinity" methane oxidizers (5, 10). Recently, a novel group of pmoA-like sequences was detected in several soils which oxidize atmospheric CH₄ (11, 12), and incubation of soils under ¹⁴CH₄ resulted in the labeling of signature phospholipid fatty acids which differed from those of known type II methanotrophs (18). It is therefore likely that as-yet-uncultured species are involved in atmospheric CH₄ uptake. However, it remains unknown whether atmospheric CH₄ oxidation is limited to particular species and whether these possess a specialized high-affinity CH₄ oxidation enzyme.

We previously demonstrated that high-affinity CH₄ oxidation is probably not limited to uncultured methanotrophic groups. We enriched a methane-oxidizing bacterium (strain LR1) from an organic soil and identified it based on 16S rDNA, pmoA, and mxaF gene sequences as a type II methanotrophic species of the Methylosinus/Methylocystis cluster (8). Mixed cultures containing strain LR1, when grown under <275 ppm volume CH₄, had a low K_m(app) for CH₄ (56 to 188 nM) similar to the value measured in soil. This increased to >1 µM when cells were grown under >1% CH₄. In the present study, we investigated the kinetics of the isolated bacterium (culture is available upon request). Instead of the time-consuming process of growing the organism under low CH₄ mixing ratios, we tested the effect of starving cells of CH₄.

Kinetics of strain LR1. Culture was grown in liquid nitrate-mineral salts (NMS) medium (8) under 10% CH₄. Purity was controlled microscopically and by plating onto NMS agar, R2A agar, 10% strength Nutrient Agar, and 10% strength AC Broth (Difco). After 1 to 2 months, the culture was diluted to about 10⁹ cells ml¹ with 0.5 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.0), and 7.5-ml amounts were added to 13-ml serum vials. The vials were capped with sterile butyl rubber stoppers and incubated with gentle shaking (6 rpm) at 25°C without added CH₄. After 1 to 2 weeks, some vials were injected with CH₄ to a final mixing ratio of 1% and incubated for a further 24 h ("unstarved"). Others remained without CH₄ ("starved"). Cell counts were made using a Neubauer chamber and showed that no population growth occurred during the 24-h incubation with 1% CH₄ (data not shown).

For determination of kinetic properties, CH₄ was injected into these vials to final mixing ratios ranging from 5 to 1,500 ppm volume. The unstarved vials still contained >0.5% CH₄ after 24 h and were first flushed well with air. Vials were shaken at 280 rpm. Starting 5 min after CH₄ addition and at 30-min intervals thereafter, CH₄ was measured by gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (8). Methane oxidation rates and kinetic parameters were estimated as previously described (8).

Unstarved cells had both a higher K_m(app) and a higher V_max(app) for CH₄ than did starved cells (Table 1). Addition of KCl may also have decreased the K_m(app). The increase of both K_m(app) and V_max(app) in unstarved culture was about 1 order of magnitude, and the specific affinity (a^o_s) (V_max(app)/K_m(app)) therefore remained nearly constant. The specific affinity is the initial slope of the hyperbolic curve, or the pseudo first-order rate constant, and directly indicates how rapidly the culture metabolized limiting substrate (4). At low CH₄ concentrations, the rate of CH₄ uptake was therefore similar in starved and unstarved culture.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 1.   Kinetic coefficients of starved and unstarved cultures of Methylocystis strain LR1 in several trialsa

These results extend our previous observations on strain LR1 by demonstrating that (i) the K_m(app) can vary in pure culture, (ii) starvation of CH₄ decreases the K_m(app), (iii) the specific affinity (a^o_s) changes little with K_m(app), and (iv) K_m(app) varies in rapid (<2 h) tests without added chloramphenicol (previous tests were run over several days and chloramphenicol was necessary to prevent enzyme production). As previously discussed (8), the variable K_m(app) could have resulted because type II methanotrophs possesses different forms of methane monooxygenase (MMO): a particulate (pMMO) and a soluble (sMMO) form. Multiple catalytic forms of pMMO also exist, depending on Cu availability (15, 17). However, while the K_m(app) values of these MMOs are different (10, 15, 21), all measured values in pure culture are above 0.8 µM. The values measured in strain LR1 are as low as 56 to 336 nM (present results and reference 8).

Multiple enzymes may be responsible for the variable K_m(app) in LR1, but because the a^o_s per cell remained constant, it cannot be concluded that a high-affinity enzyme was induced to better utilize limiting CH₄. This possibility is consistent with the data only if reactivation of inactive cells and expression of a lower-affinity enzyme compensated for each other in the unstarved culture and caused the a^o_s to remain constant. However, if this were so, a biphasic kinetic curve should have been evident, and this was never observed. A better explanation for our results is that measured K_m(app) values do not always represent true, constant enzyme properties. Because of diffusion limitation in experimental systems, many reported K_m(app) values are gross overestimates (14). In order to control for this in our experiments, the CH₄ oxidation rate constants in the linear portion of the hyperbolic curve were also often measured with culture diluted 50%. These rate constants were close to 50% of the rate constants in undiluted culture (in six cases, rate constants were 42, 54, 61, 73, 74, and 81%), indicating that there was only a slight limitation in CH₄ movement from the gas phase to the liquid phase. We also used the minimum incubation times which yielded reproducible data (<2 h) to estimate CH₄ oxidation rates. To illustrate the effect of longer incubation times, we measured an initial 0 to 2 h rate at five CH₄ concentrations in a 10-day-starved culture, and then after 4 h (during which the CH₄ declined <40%) reinjected enough CH₄ to bring each vial back to its initial CH₄ concentration and measured a 4 to 6 h rate (Fig. 1). The CH₄ oxidation rate increased with time, most strikingly at the higher CH₄ concentrations. This trend leads to an overestimation of the K_m(app) with increasing incubation times.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1.   CH4 oxidation rates at five CH4 concentrations in a 10-day-starved culture of Methylocystis strain LR1, measured 0 to 2 h () and 4 to 6 h () after adding CH4.

Although we minimized these methodological problems, there are further ways in which an apparent K_m in a complex system can vary. The K_m(app) of MMO for CH₄ is affected by the CH₄ association and dissociation constants, the rate of CH₄ diffusion across the cell envelope, and the concentrations of cosubstrates (O₂ and reductant). One explanation for the lower K_m(app) in starved cells is low reductant availability. The mechanism of pMMO is not well elucidated, but sMMO follows a catalytic sequence in which O₂, CH₄, and NADH sequentially bind (9, 20). If in starved cells CH₄ binds normally but the overall catalytic cycle is slowed by NADH limitation, the rate-limiting step may cease to be the association and dissociation of CH₄ to the enzyme (i.e., the affinity constant) and instead become the reaction rate (i.e., the kinetic constant). In such a case, both the V_max(app) and the K_m(app) for CH₄ decrease (19). To illustrate this, the following reaction diagram has been simplified to consider only CH₄ as a reactant. The binding of O₂ and NADH and the formation of methanol are considered by the rate constant k_p:
Here, K_m(app) = [k_(s) + k_p]/[k_s + k_(p)]. Limitation of reductant will decrease the reaction rate constant k_p and in turn decrease K_m(app) (i.e., cause a higher apparent affinity). The above model is a very simple explanation of the observed variability. The truth may of course be more complex.

Bender and Conrad (2) observed that incubation of various soils under 20% CH₄ increased methanotrophic K_m(app) and V_max(app) values by 1 to 3 orders of magnitude, but increased methanotrophic cell counts only 3- to 10-fold. When specific affinities were calculated (Table 2), two of these soils (a meadow cambisol and a cultivated cambisol) had a similar pattern as LR1that a^o_s varied little despite large changes (30- to 100-fold) of K_m(app). A third soil (forest luvisol) had a much lower a^o_s after enrichment than before, suggesting that a different population had become active in CH₄-enriched soil. Comparisons must be cautiously made, but these data suggest that the pattern noted in LR1 is applicable to some, but not all, soils.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 2.   Michaelis-Menten apparent half-saturation constants for CH4 oxidation in three soils, and calculated specific affinities from data given in reference 2a

It is clear from this and other work (3, 8) that the K_m(app) for CH₄ changes with culture conditions. Nevertheless, our lowest measured K_m(app) is still higher than the lowest measured values in soil of about 10 nM (8), so we hesitate to conclude that no true high-affinity MMO exists. Calculations based on maintenance energy requirements suggest that methanotrophic bacteria cannot survive on atmospheric CH₄ without a more efficient CH₄-oxidizing system (6). However, soil methanotrophs may not consume only atmospheric methane but also alternate substrates, such as methanol (3, 13), or CH₄ produced in anaerobic soil microsites (1, 7, 16, 22). Our present results show that the observed high-affinity activity in soil cannot in itself be taken as proof that the responsible bacteria are novel oligotrophic species with a specialized form of MMO.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

P.F.D. was supported by a stipendium from the Max Planck Society and a grant from the EC RTD Programme Biotechnology.

	FOOTNOTES

^* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Max-Planck-Institut für terrestrische Mikrobiologie, Karl-von-Frisch Strasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany. Phone: (49) 6421-178-733. Fax: (49) 6421-178-809. E-mail: dunfield{at}mailer.uni-marburg.de.

	REFERENCES

Top Abstract Text References

1.	Andersen, B. L., G. Bidoglio, A. Leip, and D. Rembges. 1998. A new method to study simultaneous methane oxidation and methane production in soils. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 12:587-594[CrossRef].
2.	Bender, M., and R. Conrad. 1992. Kinetics of CH4 oxidation in oxic soils exposed to ambient air or high CH4 mixing ratios. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 101:261-270[CrossRef].
3.	Benstead, J., G. M. King, and H. G. Williams. 1998. Methanol promotes atmospheric methane oxidation by methanotrophic cultures and soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:1091-1098[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4.	Button, D. K. 1998. Nutrient uptake by microorganisms according to kinetic parameters from theory as related to cytoarchitecture. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:636-645[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5.	Conrad, R. 1996. Soil microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases (H2, CO, CH4, OCS, N2O, and NO). Microbiol. Rev. 60:609-640[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6.	Conrad, R. 2000. Soil microorganisms oxidizing atmospheric trace gases (CH4, CO, H2, NO). Ind. J. Microbiol. 39:193-203.
7.	Dunfield, P. F., E. Topp, C. Archambault, and R. Knowles. 1995. Effect of nitrogen fertilizers and moisture content on CH4 and N2O fluxes in a humisol: measurements in the field and intact soil cores. Biogeochemistry 29:199-222[CrossRef].
8.	Dunfield, P. F., W. Liesack, T. Henckel, R. Knowles, and R. Conrad. 1999. High-affinity methane oxidation by a soil enrichment culture containing a type II methanotroph. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:1009-1014[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9.	Gassner, G. T., and S. J. Lippard. 1999. Component interactions in the soluble methane monooxygenase system from Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath). Biochemistry 38:12768-12785[CrossRef][Medline].
10.	Hanson, R. S., and T. E. Hanson. 1996. Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 60:439-471[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11.	Henckel, T., U. Jäckel, S. Schnell, and R. Conrad. 2000. Molecular analyses of novel methanotrophic communities in forest soil that oxidize atmospheric methane. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:1801-1808[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12.	Holmes, A. J., P. Roslev, I. R. McDonald, N. Iversen, K. Henriksen, and J. C. Murrell. 1999. Characterization of methanotrophic bacterial populations in soils showing atmospheric methane uptake. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:3312-3318[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13.	Jensen, S., A. Priemé, and L. Bakken. 1998. Methanol improves methane uptake in starved methanotrophic microorganisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:1143-1146[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14.	Joergensen, L., and H. Degn. 1983. Mass spectrometric measurements of methane and oxygen utilization by methanotrophic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 20:331-335[CrossRef].
15.	Lontoh, S., and J. D. Semrau. 1998. Methane and trichloroethylene degradation by Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b expressing particulate methane monooxygenase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:1106-1114[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16.	Macdonald, J. A., U. Skiba, L. J. Sheppard, K. J. Hargreaves, K. A. Smith, and D. Fowler. 1996. Soil environmental variables affecting the flux of methane from a range of forest, moorland and agricultural soils. Biogeochemistry 34:113-132.
17.	Nguyen, H. T., S. J. Elliott, J. H. Yip, and S. I. Chan. 1998. The particulate methane monooxygenase from Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath) is a novel copper-containing three-subunit enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 273:7957-7966[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18.	Roslev, P., and N. Iversen. 1999. Radioactive fingerprinting of microorganisms that oxidize atmospheric methane in different soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:4064-4070[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19.	Segel, I. H. 1993. Enzyme kinetics: behavior and analysis of rapid equilibrium and steady-state enzyme systems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
20.	Siegbahn, P. E. M., R. H. Crabtree, and P. Nordlund. 1998. Mechanism of methane monooxygenasea structural and quantum chemical perspective. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 3:314-317[CrossRef].
21.	Sipkema, E. M., W. de Koning, K. J. Ganzeveld, D. B. Janssen, and A. A. C. M. Beenackers. 1998. Experimental pulse technique for the study of microbial kinetics in continuous culture. J. Biotechnol. 64:159-176[CrossRef].
22.	Yavitt, J. B., T. J. Fahey, and J. A. Simmons. 1995. Methane and carbon dioxide dynamics in a northern hardwood ecosystem. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 59:796-804[Abstract/Free Full Text].

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Ricke, P., Kube, M., Nakagawa, S., Erkel, C., Reinhardt, R., Liesack, W. (2005). First Genome Data from Uncultured Upland Soil Cluster Alpha Methanotrophs Provide Further Evidence for a Close Phylogenetic Relationship to Methylocapsa acidiphila B2 and for High-Affinity Methanotrophy Involving Particulate Methane Monooxygenase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 7472-7482 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Knief, C., Lipski, A., Dunfield, P. F. (2003). Diversity and Activity of Methanotrophic Bacteria in Different Upland Soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 6703-6714 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tchawa Yimga, M., Dunfield, P. F., Ricke, P., Heyer, J., Liesack, W. (2003). Wide Distribution of a Novel pmoA-Like Gene Copy among Type II Methanotrophs, and Its Expression in Methylocystis Strain SC2. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 5593-5602 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dunfield, P. F. Articles by Conrad, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dunfield, P. F. Articles by Conrad, R. Agricola Articles by Dunfield, P. F. Articles by Conrad, R.