Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2001, p. 339-344, Vol. 67, No. 1
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.1.339-344.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Inactivation of Gram-Negative Bacteria by Lysozyme, Denatured
Lysozyme, and Lysozyme-Derived Peptides under High
Hydrostatic Pressure
Barbara
Masschalck,
Rob
Van
Houdt,
Ellen G. R.
Van
Haver, and
Chris W.
Michiels*
Laboratory of Food Microbiology, Katholieke
Universiteit Leuven, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
Received 17 July 2000/Accepted 24 October 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have studied the inactivation of six gram-negative bacteria
(Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas fluorescens,
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Salmonella
enteritidis, Shigella sonnei, and Shigella
flexneri) by high hydrostatic pressure treatment in the presence
of hen egg-white lysozyme, partially or completely denatured
lysozyme, or a synthetic cationic peptide derived from either hen
egg white or coliphage T4 lysozyme. None of these compounds had a
bactericidal or bacteriostatic effect on any of the tested bacteria at
atmospheric pressure. Under high pressure, all bacteria except both
Salmonella species showed higher inactivation in the presence of 100 µg of lysozyme/ml than without this additive, indicating that pressure sensitized the bacteria to lysozyme. This
extra inactivation by lysozyme was accompanied by the formation of
spheroplasts. Complete knockout of the muramidase enzymatic activity of
lysozyme by heat treatment fully eliminated its bactericidal effect
under pressure, but partially denatured lysozyme was still active
against some bacteria. Contrary to some recent reports, these results
indicate that enzymatic activity is indispensable for the antimicrobial
activity of lysozyme. However, partial heat denaturation extended
the activity spectrum of lysozyme under pressure to serovar
Typhimurium, suggesting enhanced uptake of partially denatured lysozyme
through the serovar Typhimurium outer membrane. All test bacteria were
sensitized by high pressure to a peptide corresponding to amino acid
residues 96 to 116 of hen egg white, and all except E. coli
and P. fluorescens were sensitized by high pressure to a
peptide corresponding to amino acid residues 143 to 155 of T4 lysozyme.
Since they are not enzymatically active, these peptides probably have a
different mechanism of action than all lysozyme polypeptides.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
High hydrostatic pressure treatment
is a promising technique for cold pasteurization of foods that allows
better retention of product flavor, texture, color, and nutrient
content than a comparable conventional heat pasteurization (17,
24). The main obstacles that prevent a commercial breakthrough
of pressure-preserved foods are the high investment cost, due to the
high pressures required for efficient microbe and enzyme destruction,
and the paucity of knowledge on the sensitivity of various pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms to hydrostatic pressure and on the factors
affecting this sensitivity.
The application of hurdle technology has been proposed as an approach
to increase the microbicidal effect of the process at lower pressures.
Hurdle technology relies on the synergistic combination of moderate
doses of two or more microbe-inactivating and/or growth-retarding factors (18). An interesting example of synergistic
inactivation exists between high pressure and a number of antimicrobial
peptides, including nisin, lysozyme, and pediocin (3, 9, 14,
19). This synergistic inactivation was observed not only in
intrinsically sensitive gram-positive bacteria but also in
gram-negative bacteria, which are normally insensitive to these
peptides because their cellular targets are shielded by their outer membrane.
In the present work we have focused on lysozyme because it has some
interesting features for application as a food preservative. First,
lysozymes are naturally present in foods such as egg white (ca. 3.2 mg/ml) (1), cow milk (ca. 0.13 µg/ml) (1),
and human colostrum (ca. 65 µg/ml) (20) but also in
several plants, such as cauliflower (ca. 27.6 µg/ml) and cabbage (ca.
2.3 µg/ml) (22). The use of these naturally occurring
lysozymes at a concentration of 10 to 100 µg/ml, as proposed in this
work, should therefore not present a toxicological concern. Second, the
bacteriostatic and bactericidal properties of lysozyme have been the
subject of many studies, and over the last 10 years, several authors
have proposed a novel antibacterial mechanism of action for lysozyme that is independent of its 1,4-
-N-acetylmuramidase
activity. These reports are based on unique bactericidal properties
observed with partially or completely denatured lysozymes having
reduced or no enzymatic activity against both gram-positive and
gram-negative bacteria (2, 10, 13, 16). For example,
Ibrahim et al. (10, 13) demonstrated inactivation by
heat-denatured lysozyme of an Escherichia coli K-12 strain,
which was relatively insensitive to native lysozyme. Düring et
al. (2) showed that native and heat-treated enzymatically
inactive lysozyme from coliphage T4 caused similar inactivation levels
on a particular E. coli strain. The antibacterial properties
of denatured lysozyme have been proposed to result from the cationic
nature of the peptide in combination with conformational changes
leading to increased hydrophobicity. These characteristics are believed
to contribute to the antimicrobial properties of several peptides
(8). Specific peptides with cationic properties and
without enzymatic activity derived from hen egg white and T4 lysozyme
were also found to have antimicrobial activity (2, 21).
The present work extends our previous observation that high pressure
sensitizes E. coli for lysozyme (3, 9, 19). We have studied the effect of denatured lysozymes and lysozyme-derived peptides, in addition to native lysozyme, in combination with high
pressure on a panel of six different gram-negative bacteria including
several foodborne pathogens. The results of this work should provide
better insight into the mode of antibacterial action of lysozyme and
contribute to the development of more efficient technology for cold
high-pressure pasteurization.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial cultures and growth conditions.
The bacteria used
in this work are E. coli K-12 strain MG1655
(5), Pseudomonas fluorescens LMMBM07,
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LMMBM01 (both from
our laboratory collection), Salmonella enteritidis ATCC13076
(from the American Type Culture Collection), Shigella
flexneri LMG10472 and Shigella sonnei LMG10473 (both
from the Belgian Coordinated Culture Collection of Microorganisms, Ghent, Belgium). All experiments were carried out with cultures in
stationary phase, obtained by growth in nutrient bouillon (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) for 21 h with shaking (200 rpm) at 37°C, except for P. fluorescens, which was incubated
at 30°C.
Growth inhibition.
Growth inhibition by lysozymes and
lysozyme-derived peptides was determined by recording growth curves in
triplicate with a Bioscreen C microbiology reader (Labsystems Oy,
Helsinki, Finland). Stationary phase cultures were diluted to between
5 × 103 and 5 × 104 cells/ml in
fresh medium, and 380 µl was transferred to the honeycomb plate wells
of the Bioscreen C reader. The volume was then adjusted to 400 µl,
either with buffer for the controls or with the appropriate solution of
antimicrobial. Every 15 min the cultures were shaken at medium
intensity for 1 min, and the turbidity was measured with a wide band
filter. The growth curves were followed for 30 h, in which time
all bacteria reached the stationary phase.
Denaturation of lysozyme and measurement of lysozyme enzymatic
activity.
Hen egg-white lysozyme (66,000 U/mg; Fluka, Buchs,
Switzerland) was stored frozen (
20°C) as a stock solution of 1 mg/ml in potassium phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH 7.0). For heat
denaturation, 100 µl of the 1-mg/ml solution was transferred to a
sterile glass capillary and treated for 20 or 60 min at 80 or 100°C
in a water bath. For denaturation with
-mercapto-ethanol, the
1-mg/ml lysozyme solution was incubated with 5%
-mercapto-ethanol
during 1 h at 60°C. After the treatments, the lysozyme samples
were put directly on ice and stored at
20°C.
The enzymatic activity of lysozyme and its derivatives was measured
with lyophilized Micrococcus lysodeikticus (ATCC 4698) cells
(Fluka) resuspended at 0.5 mg/ml in 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer
(pH 7.0) as a substrate using a method adapted from Weisner (25). Thirty-microliter aliquots of different dilutions of
the sample were added to 300 µl of M. lysodeikticus cell
suspension, and the lysis of cells was measured automatically as the
decrease in turbidity (optical density at 600 nm [OD600])
with the Bioscreen C microbiology reader during 40 min at 20°C. The
dilution resulting in a rate of turbidity decrease between 0.001 and
0.005 OD U/min was used to calculate the enzymatic activity. Enzymatic
activity was expressed in units per milligram of protein or as a
percentage relative to untreated lysozyme.
Synthetic peptides.
Two synthetic peptides (95% purity)
were purchased from Eurogentec (Herstal, Belgium). Peptide HEL96-116
(H2N-KKI VSD GNG MNA WVA WRK RCK-COOH) is a 21-mer peptide
corresponding to amino acids 96 to 116 of hen egg-white lysozyme (HEL).
Peptide T4L143-155 (H2N-PNR AKR VIT TFR T-COOH) is a 13-mer
peptide and corresponds to amino acids 143 to 155 of bacteriophage T4
lysozyme (T4L).
Pressure treatment.
Cells in stationary phase were harvested
by centrifugation (3,800 × g, 5 min) and resuspended
in the same volume of potassium phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH 7.0),
yielding a final cell population of 5 × 108 to 5 × 109 CFU/ml. Although the pH of phosphate buffer is more
pressure dependent than the pH of some other buffers (15),
phosphate buffer was chosen for this study because it is widely used in inactivation studies and is not harmful to microorganisms. After the
addition of lysozyme or one of its derivatives where appropriate, cell
suspensions (300 µl) were sealed without air bubbles in sterile polyethylene bags and subjected at 20°C to pressures in the range of
155 to 300 MPa. Pressure treatment was done in a system with eight
parallel thermostatically controlled 8-ml vessels which could be
simultaneously pressurized and individually decompressed at different
times (Resato, Roden, The Netherlands). The compression rate was
approximately 100 MPa/min; decompression was in less than 3 s. The
high-pressure transmission fluid used was Resato high-pressure fluid
TP1, a mixture of glycols (Van Meeuwen, Wesp, The Netherlands). The
pressurization times reported do not include the come-up and come-down
time. It should also be noted that the temperature in the vessels could
not be kept constant, due to adiabatic compression and decompression.
Temperature measurements with thermocouples inside the pressure
vessels, which had been previously conducted under identical
circumstances, suggested a temperature increase to 29°C upon rapid
pressurization to 300 MPa.
To measure bactericidal activities at atmospheric pressure, a part of
the suspension with the additives was kept at room temperature
without
pressurization and was plated after the same exposure
time as the
pressurized
samples.
Enumeration of viable cells.
Appropriate dilutions in
sterile potassium phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH 7.0) were surface plated
with a spiral plater (Spiral System Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio) on tryptic
soy agar for E. coli and P. fluorescens or on
plate count agar (both media from Oxoid) for the other bacteria. The
plated volume was 50 µl, and hence the detection limit was 20 CFU/ml.
Colonies were allowed to develop for 24 to 48 h at the appropriate
incubation temperature. Inactivation was expressed as a logarithmic
viability reduction, log (N0/N), with N and N0
the colony counts after a treatment and in the untreated sample,
respectively. For all treatments, averages ± standard deviations
for at least three independent cultures of each strain are shown.
Significant differences were calculated with the paired Student's
t test.
 |
RESULTS |
Sensitization for native lysozyme.
The test panel of six
gram-negative bacteria including four pathogens (two
Salmonella and two Shigella strains) was screened for sensitivity to native lysozyme under conditions of ambient and of
elevated pressure. Two concentrations, 10 and 100 µg of lysozyme/ml,
were used to investigate dose dependency. Growth curves in the presence
of lysozyme revealed no inactivation or growth retardation for any of
the bacteria, even at 100 µg of lysozyme/ml (data not shown). Higher
concentrations of lysozyme were not tested, since these tended to cause
aggregation of the bacteria, making the plate counts unreliable.
Sensitization for lysozyme by high pressure was tested by adding
lysozyme to the bacterial suspensions before pressure treatment
(Table
1). For each strain a pressure was chosen
that, in the
absence of lysozyme, caused an inactivation of at least 1 log
unit. We speculated that in this way the pressure treatment would
be severe enough to sensitize the cells to lysozyme. Because of
their
different pressure sensitivities, a uniform pressure treatment
could
not be used for all the bacteria. At 10 µg/ml, only
E. coli and
P. fluorescens were sensitized to lysozyme by
high pressure,
but at 100 µg/ml,
S. flexneri and
S. sonnei also became sensitive,
and the extra logarithmic viability
reduction caused by lysozyme
for
E. coli and
P. fluorescens increased from 0.4 to 1.0 and from
1.5 to 2.5, respectively. Neither
Salmonella strain was inactivated
by
lysozyme under pressure, and the presence of 100 µg of lysozyme/ml
even had a protective effect against pressure inactivation for
Salmonella serovar Typhimurium. In three treatments
(
S. sonnei with lysozyme at 10 and 100 µg/ml, and serovar
Typhimurium at
100 µg/ml), standard deviations were remarkably higher
than in
any other treatment. These experiments were repeated in
triplicate
but the standard deviations remained high.
Sensitivity for lysozyme under pressure was transient, since exposure
of pressure-treated cells to lysozyme (1 h at room temperature)
after
pressure treatment did not cause further inactivation, not
even for
P. fluorescens, which was most sensitive for lysozyme
under
pressure.
Sensitization for partially heat- or
-mercapto-ethanol-denatured
lysozyme.
It has been suggested by some authors that partial or
even complete heat denaturation would extend the working spectrum of lysozyme to some gram-negative bacteria that are not normally sensitive
to lysozyme (2, 10, 13). We wanted to confirm these
remarkable observations on our own panel of test bacteria and to
compare the bactericidal efficiency of native and denatured lysozymes
under high pressure. First, we tested whether lysozyme is denatured by
the high pressure treatment itself. This seems not to be the case,
since even after a harsh treatment at 600 MPa and 60°C during 15 min,
100% of the enzymatic activity was retained (Table
2). Lysozyme was denatured with heat in a
way similar to that described by Ibrahim et al. (10, 13)
and, in addition, with
-mercapto-ethanol. The different treatments of lysozyme, the designations used for each denatured product, and the
corresponding remaining enzymatic activities are shown in Table 2. Two
denatured forms (H100/20-lys and M-lys) were almost completely
enzymatically inactive with, respectively, 0.6 and 0.5% of residual
activity whereas one (H80/20-lys) still had 11.5% of lytic activity.
In the high pressure experiments, H80/20-lys was applied at 10 µg/ml
and the more denatured forms at 10 and 100 µg/ml.
In control experiments at atmospheric pressure, no bacteriostatic or
bactericidal activity could be detected for any of the
denatured forms
on any of the test bacteria (data not shown).
Since the solution of
M-lys still contained

-mercapto-ethanol,
another series of control
experiments was performed in which all
test bacteria were pressure
treated in the presence of 5%

-mercapto-ethanol,
but no enhanced
lethality was observed due to the presence of
this compound (data not
shown). Table
3 shows the reduction
factors
of all the test bacteria when treated with the denatured
lysozymes
under high pressure. In general, denatured lysozymes were
active
under pressure against fewer bacteria than intact lysozyme at
the same concentration. Both strongly denatured lysozymes (H100/20-lys
and M-lys) were completely inactive under pressure at 10 µg/ml,
although they remained active against at least one of the bacteria
at
100 µg/ml. An interesting observation concerns serovar Typhimurium,
which was sensitive under pressure for some of the denatured lysozymes
(H80/20-lys at 10 µg/ml and H100/20-lys at 100 µg/ml), while it
was
not sensitive for native lysozyme even at 100 µg/ml. This
remarkable
behavior of serovar Typhimurium was confirmed in an
experiment with six
replicate samples. Serovar Typhimurium was
not sensitive, however,
to the

-mercapto-ethanol-denatured lysozyme
(M-lys), although the
latter had almost the same level of enzymatic
activity as H100/20-lys.
M-lys at 100 µg/ml was active only against
P. fluorescens.
This organism was also sensitive to H80/20-lys
(10 µg/ml) and
H100/20-lys (100 µg/ml) under pressure and was
therefore the most
sensitive of the tested bacteria.
Contribution of enzymatic activity to the bactericidal properties
of lysozymes under pressure.
In the experiment described above,
the denatured lysozymes always had some residual enzymatic activity. To
clarify whether enzymatic activity is necessary at all for the
bactericidal effects observed with denatured lysozymes under pressure,
we subjected lysozyme to heat treatment at 100°C during 60 min,
obtaining a sample with undetectable enzymatic activity (H100/60-lys).
The inactivation of P. fluorescens, as the most sensitive of
all tested bacteria in the previous experiments, by H100/60-lys and
H80/20-lys under pressure was subsequently compared and it was found
that the completely denatured lysozyme had lost its bactericidal
activity (data not shown). A further confirmation for the role of
peptidoglycanolytic activity was found by microscopic observation of
cell morphology after pressure treatment. The bactericidal effect
caused by intact or partially denatured lysozyme under high pressure
was always accompanied by a change in the morphology of the cells from
rod to sphere. This change did not occur in the absence of lysozyme or
with the completely denatured lysozyme and is therefore most likely due
to the formation of spheroplasts as a result of the residual lytic
activity of lysozyme.
Sensitization for lysozyme-derived peptides.
In a final set of
experiments, two synthetic peptides derived, respectively, from hen
egg-white lysozyme (HEL96-116) and E. coli bacteriophage T4
lysozyme (T4L143-155) were investigated for antibacterial activity.
Peptide HEL96-116 is similar to the bactericidal peptide of 15 amino
acids that was isolated by Pellegrini et al. (21) by
digesting lysozyme with the protease clostripain but has two additional
NH2-terminal and four additional COOH-terminal amino acids
from the original lysozyme sequence. This increases the cationic
character of the peptide, which is known to contribute to the
antibacterial activity of several antibiotic peptides (7). Peptide T4L143-155 was chosen and synthesized by Düring et al. (2) for its amphiphatic character and helicoidal structure and was also found to have bactericidal activity. The calculated isoelectric points of HEL96-116 and T4L143-155 are 10.29 and 12.40, respectively, and both peptides were completely enzymatically inactive.
These two peptides were applied to our test panel of bacteria at 100 µg/ml. At atmospheric pressure neither growth inhibition
nor
inactivation was observed (data not shown). Under pressure
(Table
4), all bacteria were sensitized for the
HEL96-116 peptide,
even serovar Typhimurium and
S. enteritidis, which were not sensitized
for native lysozyme under
pressure. On the other hand, peptide
T4L143-155 was active under
pressure against all bacteria except
E. coli and
P. fluorescens, two bacteria that were very sensitive
to native
lysozyme under pressure. HEL96-116 was more effective
than T4L143-155
against all bacteria, and bactericidal activity
of both peptides under
pressure was not accompanied by spheroplast
formation.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 4.
Logarithmic viability reduction of bacterial suspensions
treated with high pressurea both without
additives and with the addition of lysozyme-derived peptides
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A first objective of this work was to investigate whether the
previously reported observation that high pressure can sensitize E. coli to lysozyme (3, 9, 19) can be extended
to other gram-negative bacteria. It was found that this is the case for some but not for all gram-negative bacteria (Table 1). Inactivation by
lysozyme under pressure was concentration dependent since at 100 µg/ml more bacteria were sensitized and a higher magnitude of
sensitization occurred than at 10 µg/ml. In line with what was
reported earlier by Hauben et al. (9) for E. coli, we found that sensitization is transient. As soon as
pressure was released, all bacteria immediately regained their
resistance to lysozyme. In addition to this type of transient
sensitization, high pressure also causes a persistant type of
sensitization, for instance to the lactoperoxidase system
(4). Of course, whether or not an organism gets sensitized
to lysozyme by high pressure may depend on many other factors, such as
pressure, temperature, pH, medium composition, and cell growth stage
and history. For example, we have previously demonstrated that
application of pressure pulses with brief interruptions can cause
sensitization to lysozyme and nisin of bacteria that are not sensitized
by a continuous pressure treatment (19).
In the present work, we explored another route to maximize the
synergistic bactericidal effect of pressure and lysozyme, by replacing
native lysozyme with denatured forms of lysozyme and peptides derived
from lysozyme, to both of which have been ascribed certain
antimicrobial effects previously.
We prepared heat-denatured lysozyme according to Ibrahim et al.
(10, 13), but we failed to confirm any of the bactericidal or bacteriostatic effects under atmospheric pressure that were reported
by these authors. Denaturation with
-mercapto-ethanol also did not
endow lysozyme with antimicrobial activity at atmospheric pressure. We
believe therefore that the effects described are very strain dependent.
The experiments with the denatured lysozymes under high pressure
(Tables 2 and 3) lead to two observations. One is that the enzymatic
activity of lysozyme is required for it to exert a bactericidal effect
under pressure. Reduction of enzymatic activity by heat or
-mercapto-ethanol denaturation clearly leads to a reduction in the
observed bactericidal effect, and complete elimination of enzymatic
activity by extended heat treatment (60 min, 100°C) completely
eliminates the bactericidal effect. At this point, therefore, our
results do not allow us to confirm the hypothesis raised by other
authors that the antimicrobial activity of lysozyme and/or
heat-denatured lysozyme would consist partly of a mechanism that is
independent of enzymatic activity (10, 13, 21). The second
observation from these experiments is that partial heat denaturation
can extend the spectrum of lysozyme bactericidal activity under
pressure to a wider range of bacteria. In our experiments, heat
denaturation made lysozyme active against serovar Typhimurium. A
threshold level of residual enzymatic activity remains a requirement also in this case, as can be deduced from the results in Table 3. The
mildly denatured lysozyme H80/20-lys (with 11.5% residual activity) is
active against serovar Typhimurium at 10 µg/ml under pressure, while
the extensively denatured H100/20-lys (with only 0.6% residual
activity) is active only at 100 µg/ml.
Taken together, these results allow us to formulate the following
hypothesis about the synergistic effect of high pressure and lysozyme
on the inactivation of gram-negative bacteria. At ambient pressure,
lysozyme is completely inactive against most gram-negative bacteria
because it cannot penetrate the outer membrane to reach its target, the
peptidoglycan. Nevertheless, lysozyme has both cationic and
lipophilic properties, which are known to contribute to an intimate
interaction with and passage through bilayer membranes of many small
peptides with antibacterial properties (8). Passage
is believed to occur through the so-called self-promoted uptake
mechanism (6). Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that deep rough mutants of serovar Typhimurium are sensitive to lysozyme (23), suggesting that small changes in outer
membrane composition may allow self-promoted uptake of lysozyme.
Conversely, a change in the structure of lysozyme by heat denaturation
can also cause the enzyme to become active against strains of
E. coli which are insensitive to native lysozyme
(10, 13). Under high pressure, the ultimate mode of action
of lysozyme remains the same, i.e., the peptidoglycanolytic activity.
However, pressure apparently stimulates passage of lysozyme through the
outer membrane of several gram-negative bacteria. We have previously
named this phenomenon pressure-assisted self-promoted uptake, or,
briefly, pressure-promoted uptake (19). Our present
results show that pressure-promoted uptake of lysozyme is not a
universal phenomenon in all gram-negative bacteria, probably because it
depends on subtle properties of, and interactions between, the cell
surface and the lysozyme molecule. Subtle changes in either the cell
surface or lysozyme structure may change the outcome of the
interaction. For example, an E. coli mutant has been
decribed that is resistant to lysozyme under pressure
(19). In the present work, mild denaturation of lysozyme
allowed successful pressure-promoted uptake and bactericidal action
against serovar Typhimurium, which is refractory to pressure-promoted uptake of native lysozyme. The underlying explanation may be an increase in the hydrophobicity of lysozyme by heat denaturation, since
it has been shown previously that increasing lysozyme hydrophobicity by
genetic fusion of a hydrophobic peptide to the NH2 terminal of the enzyme (12) or by chemical modification of the
lysyl residues with saturated fatty acids (11) enhanced
the activity of lysozyme against gram-negative bacteria. An alternative
mode of antibacterial action that has been proposed for lysozyme is that the binding of lysozyme to the bacterial envelope would activate the autolysins (13, 16). As a second part of this work,
the bactericidal effect under pressure of two specific lysozyme-derived peptides to which antibacterial properties had been previously assigned
(2, 21) was investigated. Again, we were unable to
reproduce these effects with our panel of test bacteria and under our
experimental conditions. However, both peptides were very effective
under high pressure, in particular the peptide derived from hen egg
white, which was active against all test bacteria (Table 4). For these
peptides, a different mechanism of bactericidal action must be involved
because they are completely devoid of enzymatic activity. The precise
mechanism remains unknown, but it seems evident that, similar to
lysozyme, bactericidal activity will depend on passage through the
outer membrane.
The use of lysozyme, heat-denatured lysozyme, and peptides derived from
lysozyme may find interesting applications in the nonthermal
preservation of foods and pharmaceutical and other products by high
pressure. In the presence of these additives, lower pressures can be
used to achieve the desired reduction factors, making high hydrostatic
pressure technology more economically feasible. For optimal
performance, the working spectrum of these compounds under pressure
will have to be studied in more detail, and it may be necessary to
design mixtures of specific compounds to cover as wide a range of
bacteria as possible. For the peptides derived from lysozyme, toxicity
studies should be conducted to demonstrate their safety before they can
be applied in foods.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by a fellowship from the Flemish
Institute for the Promotion of Scientific Technical Research (IWT) to
B. M. and by research grants from the K. U. Leuven Research Fund (OT/97/31 and VIS/98/009) and the F. W. O.
Flanders
(G.0395.98).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of
Food Microbiology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kard. Mercierlaan 92, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium. Phone: 32-16-321578. Fax: 32-16-321960. E-mail: Chris.michiels{at}agr.kuleuven.ac.be.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Conner, D. E.
1993.
Naturally occurring compounds, p. 441-468.
In
P. M. Davindson, and A. L. Branen (ed.), Antimicrobials in foods. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 2.
|
Düring, K.,
P. Porsch,
A. Mahn,
O. Brinkmann, and W. Gieffers.
1999.
The non-enzymatic microbicidal activity of lysozymes.
FEBS Lett.
449:93-100[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
García-Graells, C.,
B. Masschalck, and C. Michiels.
1999.
Inactivation of Escherichia coli in milk by high hydrostatic pressure treatment in combination with antimicrobial peptides.
J. Food Prot.
62:1248-1254[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Garcia-Graells, C.,
C. Valckx, and C. W. Michiels.
2000.
Inactivation of Escherichia coli and Listeria innocua in milk by combined treatment with high hydrostatic pressure and the lactoperoxidase system.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
66:4173-4179[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Guyer, M. S.,
R. R. Reed,
J. A. Steitz, and K. B. Low.
1981.
Identification of a sex-factor-affinity site in E. coli as  .
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
45:135-140.
|
| 6.
|
Hancock, R. E. W.,
T. Falla, and M. Brown.
1995.
Cationic bactericidal peptides.
Adv. Microb. Physiol.
37:135-175[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Hancock, R. E. W.
1997.
Peptide antibiotics.
Lancet
349:418-422[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Hancock, R. E. W., and D. S. Chapple.
1999.
Peptide antibiotics.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:1317-1323[Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Hauben, K.,
E. Wuytack,
C. Soontjens, and C. Michiels.
1996.
High pressure transient sensitization of Escherichia coli to lysozyme and nisin by disruption of outer-membrane permeability.
J. Food Prot.
59:350-355.
|
| 10.
|
Ibrahim, H.,
S. Higashiguchi,
M. Koketsu,
F. Juneja,
M. Kim,
T. Yamamoto,
Y. Sugimoto, and T. Aoki.
1996.
Partially unfolded lysozyme at neutral pH agglutinates and kills gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria through membrane damage mechanism.
J. Agric. Food Chem.
44:3799-3806[CrossRef].
|
| 11.
|
Ibrahim, H. R.,
K. Kobayashi, and A. Kato.
1993.
Length of hydrocarbon chain and antimicrobial action to gram-negative bacteria of fatty acylated lysozyme.
J. Agric. Food Chem.
41:1164-1168[CrossRef].
|
| 12.
|
Ibrahim, H. R.,
M. Yamada,
K. Matsushita,
K. Kobayashi, and A. Kato.
1994.
Enhanced bactericidal action of lysozyme to Escherichia coli by inserting a hydrophobic pentapeptide into its C terminus.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:5059-5063[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Ibrahim, H. R.,
S. Higashiguchi,
M. Koketsu,
L. R. Juneja,
M. Kim, and T. Yamamoto.
1996.
A structural phase of heat-denatured lysozyme with novel antimicrobial action.
J. Agric. Food Chem.
44:1416-1423[CrossRef].
|
| 14.
|
Kalchayanand, N.,
A. Sikes,
C. P. Dunne, and B. Ray.
1998.
Interaction of hydrostatic pressure, time and temperature of pressurization and pediocin AcH on inactivation of foodborne bacteria.
J. Food Prot.
61:425-431[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Kitamura, Y., and T. Itoh.
1987.
Reaction volume of protonic ionization for buffering agents. Prediction of pressure dependence of pH and pOH.
J. Solu. Chem.
16:715-725.
|
| 16.
|
Laible, N. J., and G. R. Germaine.
1985.
Bactericidal activity of human lysozyme, muramidase-inactive lysozyme, and cationic polypeptides against Strepococcus sanguis and Streptococcus faecalis: inhibition by chitin oligosaccharides.
Infect. Immun.
48:720-728[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Leadly, C. E., and A. Williams.
1997.
High pressure processing of foods and drink. An overview of recent developments and future potential.
In
New Technologies Bulletin, no. 14, March. Campden and Chorleywood Food Research Association, Chipping Campden, Gloucester, GL55 6LD, United Kingdom.
|
| 18.
|
Leistner, L., and L. G. M. Gorris.
1995.
Food preservation by hurdle technology.
Trends Food Sci. Tech.
6:41-46.
|
| 19.
|
Masschalck, B.,
C. García-Graells,
E. Van Haver, and C. Michiels.
2000.
Inactivation of high pressure resistant Escherichia coli by lysozyme and nisin under high pressure.
Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol.
1:39-47.
|
| 20.
|
Mathur, N. B.,
A. M. Dwarkadas,
V. K. Sharma,
K. Saha, and N. Jain.
1990.
Anti-infective factors in preterm human colostrum.
Acta Paediatr. Scand.
79:1039-1044[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Pellegrini, A.,
U. Thomas,
N. Bramaz,
S. Klauser,
P. Hunziker, and R. Von Fellenberg.
1997.
Identification and isolation of a bactericidal domain in chicken egg white lysozyme.
J. Appl. Microbiol.
82:372-387[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Proctor, V. A., and F. E. Cunningham.
1988.
The chemistry of lysozyme and its use as a food preservative and a pharmaceutical.
Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.
26:359-395[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Sanderson, K. E.,
T. MacAlister, and J. W. Costerton.
1974.
Permeability of lipopolysaccharide-deficient rough mutants of Salmonella typhimurium to antibiotics, lysozyme and other agents.
Can. J. Microbiol.
20:1135-1145[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Smelt, J. P. P. M.
1998.
Recent advances in the microbiology of high pressure processing.
Trends Food Sci. Tech.
9:152-158.
|
| 25.
|
Weisner, B.
1984.
Lysozyme, p. 189-194.
In
H. R. Bergmayer (ed.), Methods of enzymatic analysis, 3rd ed., vol. IV. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, Germany.
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2001, p. 339-344, Vol. 67, No. 1
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.1.339-344.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Nash, J. A., Ballard, T. N. S., Weaver, T. E., Akinbi, H. T.
(2006). The Peptidoglycan-Degrading Property of Lysozyme Is Not Required for Bactericidal Activity In Vivo. J. Immunol.
177: 519-526
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Leon-Sicairos, N., Lopez-Soto, F., Reyes-Lopez, M., Godinez-Vargas, D., Ordaz-Pichardo, C., de la Garza, M.
(2006). Amoebicidal Activity of Milk, Apo-lactoferrin, sIgA and Lysozyme.. Clin Med Res
4: 106-113
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Manas, P., Mackey, B. M.
(2004). Morphological and Physiological Changes Induced by High Hydrostatic Pressure in Exponential- and Stationary-Phase Cells of Escherichia coli: Relationship with Cell Death. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
70: 1545-1554
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lopez-Pedemonte, T. J., Roig-Sagues, A. X., Trujillo, A. J., Capellas, M., Guamis, B.
(2003). Inactivation of Spores of Bacillus cereus in Cheese by High Hydrostatic Pressure with the Addition of Nisin or Lysozyme. J DAIRY SCI
86: 3075-3081
[Abstract]
[Full Text]