Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2001, p. 4458-4463, Vol. 67, No. 10
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.10.4458-4463.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
-Glutamate as a Substrate for
Glutamine Synthetase
Patrice
Robinson,1
Kelly
Neelon,1
Harold J.
Schreier,2 and
Mary F.
Roberts1,*
Merkert Chemistry Center, Boston College,
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 024671 and
Center of Marine Biotechnology, University of Maryland
Biotechnology Institute, Baltimore, Maryland 212022
Received 12 March 2001/Accepted 17 July 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The conversion of
-glutamate to
-glutamine by archaeal and
bacterial glutamine synthetase (GS) enzymes has been examined. The GS
from Methanohalophilus portucalensis (which was partially purified) is capable of catalyzing the amidation of this substrate with
a rate sevenfold less than the rate obtained with
-glutamate. Recombinant GS from the archaea Methanococcus jannaschii
and Archaeoglobus fulgidus were considerably more selective
for
-glutamate than
-glutamate as a substrate. All the archaeal
enzymes were much less selective than the two bacterial GS (from
Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis), whose
specific activities towards
-glutamate were much smaller than rates
with the
-isomer. These results are discussed in light of the
observation that
-glutamate is accumulated as an osmolyte in many
archaea while
-glutamine (produced by glutamine synthetase) is used
as an osmolyte only in M. portucalensis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The glutamate-to-glutamine
conversion by glutamine synthetase (GS) provides the nitrogen donor for
the first step in the biosynthesis of many amino acids, purines,
pyrimidines, and amino sugars. In most bacteria and archaea GS is a
multimeric enzyme consisting of 12 identical subunits, each with a mass
of 50 to 55 kDa (12). Modes of regulation further classify
the enzyme as GSI-
(not subject to adenylylation [4])
or GSI-
activities (as exemplified by the Escherichia
coli GS [12, 23]). GS appears to have another unusual role in one particular archaeon. The halophilic methanogen Methanohalophilus portucalensis uses
-glutamine as an
osmolyte when grown in media containing >2 M NaCl (10, 17,
19). Synthesis of
-glutamine in this organism has been
suggested to occur via GS action on
-glutamate (16).
M. portucalensis is the only organism known to date to
accumulate this zwitterionic
-amino acid, although
-glutamate is
a substrate for sheep brain and rat liver GS (14). The
ability of GS to use
-glutamate as a substrate may be a
characteristic of other archaea or of a wider range of bacteria, or it
may be a property only associated with the halophilic methanogen. In
order to examine this, GS from M. portucalensis was
partially purified and its activity toward both
- and
-glutamate
was examined. The selectivity of
- over
-glutamate is much
lower for the M. portucalensis GS than for the GS from the
other archaeal (cloned and purified enzymes from Methanococcus jannaschii and Archaeoglobus fulgidus) and bacterial
(E. coli and Bacillus subtilis) enzyme activities
examined. This enhanced relative activity toward
-glutamate is
consistent with an involvement of the enzyme in the accumulation of
-glutamine in high-NaCl environments in M. portucalensis.
These results are discussed in terms of the role of
-glutamate and
-glutamine as osmolytes in archaea.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Chemicals.
Tris-HCl, MgCl2,
-mercaptoethanol,
-glutamate,
-glutamate, and NH4Cl were obtained from
Sigma. Q-Sepharose Fast Flow anion exchange resin was purchased from Pharmacia.
Enzymes.
The A. fulgidus VC-16 GS structural gene
was cloned and overexpressed in E. coli, and the enzyme was
purified to near homogeneity by a procedure that will be described
elsewhere. Similarly, the M. jannaschii glnA gene was
cloned and overexpressed in E. coli, and the protein
purified to homogeneity (to be reported elsewhere). GS from E. coli was purchased from Sigma, and the enzyme from B. subtilis was prepared as described previously (20).
GS assays.
Two assays for GS activity (1) were
used, one measuring synthetic activity (conversion of
-glutamate to
-glutamylhydroxamate) and the other measuring transferase activity
(conversion of
-glutamine to
-glutamylhydroxamate). The synthetic
GS assay mix (0.5 ml) contained L-
-glutamate or
-glutamate (varying from 30 to 350 mM), MgCl2 (55 mM),
hydroxylamine-HCl (46 mM), and imidazole (92 mM), pH 7.0. The
reaction was initiated by the addition of ATP at a final concentration
of 20 mM. Blanks were run in parallel, substituting water for ATP. The
transferase assay mixture (0.5 ml) contained
L-
-glutamine (25 mM), MnCl2 (2.5 mM),
hydroxylamine-HCl (50 mM), K2HPO4 (25 mM) or Na2HAsO4, and imidazole (25 mM), pH 7.0. The GS exchange reaction was initiated with the addition of
ADP to a final concentration of 4 mM (omitted in the blanks). The use
of Mg2+ in the synthesis reaction and Mn2+ in
the glutamyl transferase assays was based on the relative effectiveness
of these two cations in assays of other GS enzymes (7)
where activity in the biosynthetic assay was usually higher with
Mg2+, while the glutamyl transfer activity was optimal with
Mn2+. All reactions were stopped with 1 ml of an acidic
FeCl3 solution (55 g of FeCl3, 20 g of
trichloroacetic acid, and 21 ml of HCl per liter of solution).
Absorbance of the
-glutamylhydroxamate-iron complex was
measured at 540 nm (1 µmol of complex = 0.533 units of
absorbance [see reference 1]). Specific activities were calculated by normalizing activity to protein concentration determined via the Bradford assay (3) with bovine serum albumin as
the standard.
Preparation of M. portucalensis protein
extracts.
Cell pellets of M. portucalensis (grown in
the presence of methanol as the substrate for methane generation in
medium containing 12% NaCl as described previously [10,
19]) were resuspended in buffer (1 ml of buffer per g of cell
pellet) containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2,
and 1 mM
-mercaptoethanol (buffer A) along with 1% Triton X-100.
The addition of Triton X-100 led to a marked increase in the activity
of crude extracts, suggesting that either the enzyme is membrane
associated as has been shown for GS from Sphagnum fallax
(8) or that hydrophobic cell components inhibit the enzyme
upon lysis. Protease inhibitors phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (50 µM), Pefabloc (0.1 mM), dithiothreitol (1 mM), and pepstatin and
leupeptin (each at 1 µg/ml) were added to the resolubilized pellet.
The cells were then ruptured via sonication, using six 30-s intervals
separated by 1 min. The protein extract was subsequently dialyzed
versus 100-fold excess of buffer A containing protease inhibitors.
Partial purification of the M. portucalensis GS was achieved
with three chromatographic steps: passage through a Q-Sepharose Fast
Flow (QFF) anion exchange column (10 ml of resin per g of cell
pellet prepared in formic acid and washed with buffer A), a
hydroxyapatite column (5 ml of resin per g of cell pellet, equilibrated
in buffer A with the addition of 0.15 M
KH2PO4), and a Blue A Dyematrex column
(equilibrated in buffer A and eluted with increasing concentrations of
-glutamate). Gel filtration on Sephacryl S-300-HR was used to
determine the native molecular mass of the GS. Molecular mass
standards included E. coli GS (600 kDa), apoferritin (443 kDa), and ATCase holoenzyme (300 kDa) and catalytic trimer (100 kDa).
Protein fractions were analyzed by the GS transferase assay and sodium
dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. For dilute protein
samples, gels were stained in 0.1% Coomassie brilliant blue with the
addition of 2% phosphoric acid and 6% ammonium sulfate, which
increases the sensitivity of the Coomassie stain (13).
 |
RESULTS |
M. portucalensis action on
- and
-glutamate.
The activity of GS in crude protein extracts from M. portucalensis was measured in the transferase (
-glutamine to
-glutamylhydroxamate) as well as synthesis (
-glutamate to
-glutamylhydroxamate) assays (crude extracts were used prior to any
purification to avoid differences in the relative amount of GS in the
protein extract). In contrast to most other GS examined to date, the
specific activity of M. portucalensis GS in the biosynthetic
assay (0.061 µmol min
1 mg
1) was about
fourfold higher than the activity in the glutamyl transferase reaction
(0.015 µmol min
1 mg
1). Enzyme activity
was moderately high toward both
-glutamate and
-glutamate at
37°C under conditions with 55 mM Mg2+ and 20 mM ATP.
Specific activities of GS in these crude protein extracts were
increased with 0.5 M potassium acetate in the buffer, so this was
routinely included in assays (the intracellular concentration of
K+ in M. portucalensis is 0.6 to 1.1 M,
depending on external NaCl [10]). That the product
produced when incubating
-glutamate with ATP and crude enzyme was
indeed
-glutamine was checked by high-performance liquid
chromatography analysis (10) of one of the reaction
mixtures in which hydroxylamine was replaced by ammonia. The dependence
of activity on glutamate concentrations is shown in Fig.
1. The ratio of specific activity for
-glutamate compared to
-glutamate ranged from 0.12 to 0.17. The
apparent mean Km ± standard deviation
for
-glutamate (104 ± 20 mM using all the data shown in
Fig. 1A or 96 ± 36 mM as the mean of three separate kinetic
experiments) was higher than the
-glutamate Km of other archaeal and bacterial GS (Table
1). The apparent Km extrapolated for
-glutamate, 175 ± 50 mM, was considerably higher (Fig. 1B). The intracellular
concentration of
-glutamate for M. portucalensis is
between 0.15 and 0.20 M, which is slightly above the GS
Km for this substrate. In contrast to
-glutamate, intracellular
-glutamate levels are less than 0.01 M
in this organism (10). The M. portucalensis GS
had a Km for ATP, 6 mM, that was comparable to
values for other GS enzymes (Table 1).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Dependence of M. portucalensis GS activity in
crude protein extracts on -glutamate (A) and -glutamate (B)
concentration. Assays were conducted at 37°C as described in
Materials and Methods. The assays with -glutamate as the substrate
were carried out with two different preparations of protein, and the
error bars show the ranges of activity for several concentrations.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Comparison of biosynthesis assay kinetic parameters for
glutamine synthetase enzymes from different sources
|
|
Partial purification and characterization of M. portucalensis GS.
To examine in greater detail the ability
of M. portucalensis GS to utilize
-glutamate, the enzyme
was purified from crude extracts via a series of chromatographic steps.
The enzyme did not bind to either QFF anion exchange or hydroxyapatite
resins. However, elution of the protein extract through these columns resulted in the removal of more than 90% of the cellular protein (the
specific activity increased from 0.061 µmol min
1
mg
1 in crude extracts to 0.11 µmol min
1
mg
1 after the QFF column and to 3.2 µmol
min
1 mg
1 after chromatography on
hydroxyapatite). After passage through the hydroxyapatite column, the
activity of the M. portucalensis GS was no longer activated
by K+. The M. portucalensis GS bound tightly to
a Blue A affinity column, and while 10 mM ADP was not effective in
eluting the protein, the enzyme could be eluted with 1.0 M
-glutamate. Through this step the yield was 0.015% of the original
protein and a 120-fold increase in specific activity. Assuming a
subunit molecular mass of 50 kDa, the M. portucalensis GS
obtained from the Blue A column would represent 5 to 10% of the total
protein at this stage in the purification. Kinetic analyses showed that
the relative rate of this enzyme preparation toward
-glutamate
compared to
-glutamate remained 0.14. The specific activity of this
material at 37°C with 164 mM
-glutamate, 20 mM ATP, 46 mM
hydroxylamine, and 55 mM Mg2+ in imidzaole, pH 7.0, was 7.3 µmol min
1 mg
1. This indicates a specific
activity of the pure protein of 70 to 140 µmol min
1
mg
1. Sephacryl S-300-HR gel filtration chromatography
indicated that the native molecular mass of M. portucalensis
GS was approximately 550 kDa, which is consistent with the dodecameric
structure found for other archaeal and bacterial GS enzymes. Subjecting
the partially purified preparations to repeated chromatographic steps
(most notably a second passage through the Blue A column) improved the extent of purification but decreased the yield of material. Eventually small amounts (<20 µg) of relatively pure protein from 5 g of cell pellet could be obtained. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels showed a single protein band with a molecular mass of 50 kDa. The
specific activity of this material was determined to be 150 ± 50 µmol min
1 mg
1, an unusually high value
compared to GS enzymes from other sources, but consistent with the
values estimated for the material eluted through a single Blue A
Dyematrex column.
Glycine and alanine, feedback inhibitors of the GS biosynthesis assay
from several sources (5, 12), were tested for their ability to inhibit the M. portucalensis GS. Both amino acids
were effective in reducing the M. portucalensis enzyme
activity when present at a concentration of 10 mM in the synthetic
assay. Alanine inhibited 26% and glycine inhibited 37% of the
M. portucalensis GS activity (conditions included 164 mM
-glutamate and 37°C). For comparison, 5 mM alanine or glycine
inhibited the archaeal GS enzymes from Methanobacterium
ivanovi (2) and A. fulgidus (H. Schreier,
unpublished results) to a similar extent. The M. portucalensis GS was also completely inhibited by the transition state analog methionine sulfoximine (1 mM), consistent with the amidation reaction proceeding via a glutamylphosphate intermediate as
it does for the well-characterized GS from E. coli and
B. subtilis (12). The combination of subunit
size, native molecular mass, and feedback inhibition suggests that the
M. portucalensis GS is a GSI-type enzyme.
-Glutamate as a substrate for other archaeal GS.
The
unusual characteristics of the M. portucalensis GS, reduced
selectivity of
- over
-glutamate and higher activity in the
synthesis versus transferase assay, may be common to GS from other
archaea. Alternatively, the GS from this halophilic methanogen could be
unique since, to date, only M. portucalensis strains have
been shown to synthesize and accumulate
-glutamine in response to
osmotic stress. With this in mind, two other archaeal GS were examined
for their ability to utilize the two glutamate isomers. Both M. jannaschii and A. fulgidus are thermophiles; neither
one accumulates
-glutamine as an osmolyte, although M. jannaschii accumulates
-glutamate as its major compatible
solute (18).
The M. jannaschii GS displays characteristics similar to
most GSI class enzymes previously studied: it is a dodecamer of 51-kDa subunits, is feedback inhibited by glycine and alanine, and is inhibited by low concentrations of methionine sulfoximine (P. Robinson
and M. F. Roberts, unpublished results). Kinetic parameters for
this recombinant enzyme were measured at 37 and 50°C. With
-glutamine as the substrate for the hydroxylamine transferase reaction, the Km was 23 ± 1 mM and the
Vmax was estimated to be 3.5 ± 0.1 µmol
min
1 mg
1 at 37°C. At 50°C
Vmax increased to 26.7 ± 4.5 µmol
min
1 mg
1, while the
Km increased by about a factor of two (~40
mM). Like most GS enzymes, the biosynthetic activity of this GS using
-glutamate and Mg2+ as the optimal cation was
considerably lower than that in the transferase reaction (with
Mn2+ as the optimal metal ion). At 60°C, M. jannaschii GS exhibited a Km for
-glutamate of 58 ± 8 mM and a Vmax of
1.3 ± 0.2 µmol min
1 mg
1 (Fig.
2A). Low biosynthetic activity was also
observed for recombinant Pyrococcus sp. GS
(15). The dependence of M. jannaschii GS
activity on
-glutamate concentration was linear up to 150 mM,
implying a high Km. At higher concentrations,
the activity of this GS toward
-glutamate decreased so that a
Km could not be determined (Fig. 2B). This
substrate inhibition was significant since at 300 mM
-glutamate very
little GS activity was detectable (while activity with
-glutamate
was easily measured). If the specific activity of the M. jannaschii GS toward
-glutamate is compared to that toward
-glutamate at different glutamate concentrations, one sees that at a
maximum it is 0.04. Therefore, for this archaeal GS,
-glutamate is a
much poorer substrate than
-glutamate.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Dependence of M. jannaschii GS activity at
60°C on the concentration of -glutamate (A) and -glutamate (B).
Note the steep decrease in activity for -glutamate concentrations
above 200 mM.
|
|
Another way to assess the binding affinities of the two glutamate
isomers to GS is to examine the inhibitory effect of each on the
-glutamine transferase reaction. At 50 mM
-glutamine (50°C),
there is a 50% decrease in GS activity in the presence of 100 mM
-glutamate. This is consistent with a Ki of
47 mM (assuming competitive inhibition by
-glutamate in the
transferase assay), not too far off from the Km
of 58±8 mM in the forward direction assay.
-Glutamate at 100 mM had
no effect on the GS transferase at 50°C with 50 or 25 mM
-glutamine. With 10 mM
-glutamine as substrate, there was
detectable inhibition by 100 mM
-glutamate consistent with a
Ki of 300 mM (assuming competitive inhibition under these conditions). Higher concentrations of
-glutamate were
more inhibitory than expected, again consistent with the observed
substrate inhibition seen with high concentrations of
-glutamate as the substrate in the forward direction assay.
A. fulgidus grows optimally at 83°C with 2% NaCl. The GS
from this organism also catalyzed the conversion of
-glutamate to
-glutamine. The specific activity with
-glutamate (100 mM) as the
substrate was 0.080 of the specific activity for
-glutamate (100 mM). For 200 mM
-glutamate, GS specific activity was 0.052 that
toward
-glutamate. No GS activity toward
-glutamate was detected
at
-glutamate concentrations above 300 mM; enzyme activity toward
-glutamate was still measurable at comparable
-glutamate concentrations (although somewhat inhibited).
-Glutamate as a substrate for bacterial GS.
-Glutamate
was also examined as a substrate for GS from two bacteria, B. subtilis and E. coli (Table 1). The B. subtilis GS exhibited a 300-fold lower specific activity when
-glutamate was present as the substrate at 200 mM than it did with
-glutamate as the substrate (1.2 nmol min
1
mg
1 versus 370 nmol min
1
mg
1). GS specific activity increased linearly with
increasing
-glutamate, implying a very high
Km for that
-amino acid. The E. coli GS had very low activity toward
-glutamate; the relative
rate with 200 mM substrate was 10
6 that obtained using
-glutamate.
 |
DISCUSSION |
-Glutamine is synthesized and accumulated as an osmolyte in
M. portucalensis, an organism that is among the most
halophilic of the methanogenic archaea. Previous work using
13C label incorporation (16) suggested that
biosynthesis of
-glutamine from
-glutamate could arise either (i)
via an activity that generated
-glutamate (aminomutase or other
activity) and then conversion of that
-amino acid to
-glutamine
via GS or (ii) by an aminomutase activity on
-glutamine to convert
it to
-glutamine (in this case
-glutamate would be a poor
substrate for the M. portucalensis GS). While bacterial
glutamate mutase enzymes are known, these convert glutamate to
methylaspartate (21) and would not be responsible for
conversion of
- to
-glutamate; there is no precedent for a
glutamine mutase activity. For the second pathway, the small amounts of
-glutamate used by several methanogens as an osmolyte with minimal
turnover under normal growth conditions (16-19) would be
generated by
-glutamine hydrolysis. The work described here clearly
shows that GS activity is capable of converting
-glutamate to
-glutamine in M. portucalensis. In attempting to
determine how
-glutamate is synthesized in archaea, we (D. D. Martin
and M. F. Roberts, unpublished results) have incubated protein
extracts from various methanogens with either
- or
-glutamate or
-glutamine and various cofactors needed (or postulated) for other
aminomutase activities (pyridoxal phosphate, glutathione, ferrous
ammonium sulfate, sodium dithionite, S-adenosylmethionine,
and acetyl coenzyme A) under anaerobic as well as aerobic conditions
and never detected isomerization of
-glutamate to
-glutamate and
vice versa (as judged by nuclear magnetic resonance and
high-performance liquid chromatography). Also, in assays with partially
purified M. portucalensis GS,
-glutamine is only
generated from
-glutamate when ATP, NH3 (NH2OH in the case of the colorimetric assay), and
Mg2+ are all present. Omission of any one of these blocks
production of
-glutamine. Thus, it is likely the M. portucalensis GS is the source of synthesizing
-glutamine from
-glutamate in these cells.
GS from M. portucalensis is of the GSI variety similar to
the other archaeal GSs characterized thus far. However, there are a
number of significant differences between this enzyme and most other
GSI-
enzymes. One notable difference is the effectiveness of the
biosynthetic assay (
-glutamate conversion to
-glutamylhydroxamate) compared to the glutamyl transfer assay
(
-glutamine conversion to
-glutamylhydroxamate). Most GS enzymes
purified to date display at least fourfold-higher activity in
transferase assays than in biosynthesis assays of
-glutamylhydroxamate formation (7), although the exact
ratio depends on the metal ion (Mn2+ or Mg2+)
used in the biosynthetic assay and the assay pH. The reverse was
observed with the M. portucalensis GS. Conversion of
-glutamate was four times faster than conversion of
-glutamine to
-glutamylhydroxamate (using Mg2+ or Mn2+).
Of the many bacterial GSs examined, only Bacillus
licheniformis GS showed an eightfold-greater biosynthesis than
transfer activity (6). The M. portucalensis GS
high Km for glutamate isomers in the
biosynthesis assay is also striking. Since M. portucalensis is a halophile, this may reflect adaptation to the very high
intracellular
-glutamate. The Km for
-glutamine, 23 mM, is comparable to the
-glutamine
Km (22.7 mM) observed with GS purified from
M. ivanovi (2). Another difference is the
relatively high rate of synthesis of
-glutamine, an osmolyte in
M. portucalensis, from
-glutamate. Given the specific
activities observed in crude extracts and the observation that once
made,
-glutamine turns over slowly (17), one can
estimate that to synthesize 1 µmol of
-glutamine per mg of cell
protein (an average value for this organism) it would take about 4 h, well under the 24-h doubling time (19) of the organism
under standard growth conditions.
Is the ability of the M. portucalensis GS to synthesize
-glutamate unique to this organism or a general characteristic of other archaea? The two archaeal GS enzymes that were examined (Table 1)
exhibited poorer activity toward
-glutamate. The maximal rate with
-glutamate as a substrate was 0.04 to 0.08 that for the comparable
concentration of
-glutamate. However, for both bacterial GS enzymes,
-glutamate was a much poorer substrate (relative activity of <0.003
that for
-glutamate), with a very high Km.
The only other GS enzymes known to convert
-glutamate to
-glutamine with good efficiency are the GS from sheep brain and rat
liver (14), although the relative rates for
- and
-glutamate depend on the nitrogen donor. Vmax
for sheep brain amidation of
-glutamate is 46% that observed for
-glutamate with hydroxylamine and 18% when ammonia is used;
partially purified rat liver GS displays a similar sensitivity to the
nitrogen donor, but with lower rates for
-glutamate compared to
-glutamate (14). What makes
-glutamate a reasonable
substrate for the M. portucalensis and mammalian GS but not
for other GS enzymes is not clear at this stage.
The lower activities of M. jannaschii and A. fulgidus GS toward
-glutamate are consistent with the
observation that neither of these hyperthermophilic organisms
accumulates
-glutamine as an osmolyte. In M. jannaschii,
-glutamate concentrations are in the range of 0.04 to 0.12 M, while
the intracellular concentration of
-glutamate is 0.4 to 0.6 M,
depending on the external NaCl concentration (H. Meekins and M. F. Roberts, unpublished results). Since M. jannaschii GS
activity decreased for
-glutamate at concentrations of
0.3 M,
there would be little conversion of
-glutamate to
-glutamine
under these intracellular conditions.
-Glutamate, with its much
lower Km, would still be converted to
-glutamine for nitrogen assimilation and for use in protein
synthesis. The observation that
-glutamate is a poor substrate for
these archaeal GSs may be a general trend in halotolerant organisms in
which
-glutamate (or
-glutamate) concentrations are high and
anions are used for osmotic balance. If the
-glutamate were a good
substrate, then it would be converted to
-glutamine, a zwitterion,
and alter the cell potential (unless intracellular K+ also decreased).
In summary, the GS from M. portucalensis was shown to have
unique kinetic characteristics consistent with its role in generating high concentrations of the osmolyte
-glutamine. In two other archaea, one of which uses
-glutamate as an osmolyte,
-glutamate was a poorer substrate. Further investigations of what is responsible for these kinetic differences will require structural analyses of these
diverse GS.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work has been supported, in part, by grant DE-FG02-91ER20025
(to M.F.R.) from the Department of Energy Biosciences Division and by a
grant from the National Science Foundation (H.J.S.) and the Wallenburg
Foundation VIRTUE program (H.J.S.).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Merkert
Chemistry Center, Boston College, 2609 Beacon St., Chestnut Hill, MA
02167. Phone: (617) 552-3616. Fax: (617) 552-2705. E-mail:
mary.roberts{at}bc.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bender, R. A.,
K. Janseen,
A. Resnick,
M. Blumenberg-Foor, and B. Magasanik.
1977.
Biochemical parameters of glutamine synthetase from Klebsiella aerogenes.
J. Bacteriol.
129:1001-1009[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Bhatnagar, L.,
J. Zeikus, and J. Aubert.
1985.
Purification and characterization of glutamine synthetase from the archaebacterium Methanobacterium ivanovi.
J. Bacteriol.
165:638-643.
|
| 3.
|
Bradford, M. M.
1976.
A rapid and sensitive method for the determination of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.
Anal. Biochem.
72:248-254[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Brown, J. R.,
Y. Masuchi,
F. T. Robb, and A. W. F. Doolittle.
1994.
Evolutionary relationships of bacterial and archaeal glutamine synthetase genes.
J. Mol. Evol.
38:566-576[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Deuel, T. F., and S. Pruisiner.
1974.
Regulation of glutamine synthetase from Bacillus subtilis by divalent cations, feedback inhibitors, and L-glutamine.
J. Biol. Chem.
249:257-264[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Donohoe, T. J., and R. W. Bernlohr.
1981.
Properties of the Bacillus licheniformis A5 glutamine synthetase purified from cells grown in the presence of ammonia or nitrate.
J. Bacteriol.
147:589-601[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Hubbard, J. S., and E. R. Stadtman.
1967.
Regulation of glutamine synthetase. II. Patterns of feedback inhibition in microorganisms.
J. Bacteriol.
93:1045-1055[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Kahl, S.,
P. von Berswordt-Wallrabe,
V. Heeschen,
H. Schmidt, and H. Rudolph.
1998.
A membrane bound enzyme in Sphagnum fallax.
J. Plant Physiol.
153:270-275.
|
| 9.
|
Kumar, S., and D. J. D. Nicholas.
1984.
Purification, properties, and regulation of glutamine synthetase from Nitrobacter agilis.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
130:959-966.
|
| 10.
|
Lai, M.-C.,
K. R. Sowers,
D. E. Robertson,
M. F. Roberts, and R. P. Gunsalus.
1991.
Distribution of compatible solutes in the halophilic methanogenic archaebacteria.
J. Bacteriol.
173:5352-5358[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Manitz, B., and A. W. Holldorf.
1993.
Purification and properties of glutamine synthetase from the archaebacterium Halobacterium salinarium.
Arch. Microbiol.
159:90-97[CrossRef].
|
| 12.
|
Meister, A.
1980.
Catalytic mechanism of glutamine synthetase: overview of glutamine metabolism, p. 1-40.
In
J. Mora, and R. Palacios (ed.), Glutamine metabolism, enzymology and regulation. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 13.
|
Neuhoff, V.,
R. Stamm, and H. Eibl.
1985.
Clear background and highly sensitive protein staining with Coomassie blue dyes in polyacrylamide gels: a systematic analysis.
Electrophoresis
6:427-428[CrossRef].
|
| 14.
|
Pruisner, S., and E. R. Stadtman.
1973.
The enzymes of glutamine metabolism.
Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 15.
|
Rahman, R. N. Z. A.,
B. Jongsareejit,
S. Fujiwara, and T. Imanaka.
1997.
Characterization of recombinant glutamine synthetase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus sp. strain KOD1.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63:2472-2476[Abstract].
|
| 16.
|
Roberts, M. F.,
M.-C. Lai, and R. P. Gunsalus.
1992.
Biosynthetic pathways of the osmolytes N -acetyl- -lysine, -glutamine, and betaine in Methanohalophilus strain FDF1 suggested by nuclear magnetic resonance analyses.
J. Bacteriol.
174:6688-6693[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Robertson, D. E.,
M.-C. Lai,
R. P. Gunsalus, and M. F. Roberts.
1992.
Composition, variation, and dynamics of major osmotic solutes in Methanohalophilus strain FDF1.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
58:2438-2443[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Robertson, D.,
M. F. Roberts,
N. Belay,
K. O. Stetter, and D. Boone.
1990.
Occurrence of -glutamate, a novel osmolyte, in methanogenic bacteria.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
56:1504-1508[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Robertson, P. M., and M. F. Roberts.
1997.
Effects of osmolyte precursors on the distribution of compatible solutes in Methanohalophilus portucalensis.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63:4032-4038[Abstract].
|
| 20.
|
Schreier, H. J.,
C. A. Rostkowski, and E. M. Kellner.
1993.
Altered regulation of the glnRA operon in a Bacillus subtilis mutant that produces methionine sulfoximine-tolerant glutamine synthetase.
J. Bacteriol.
175:892-897[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Tollinger, M.,
R. Konrat,
B. H. Hilbert,
E. N. Marsh, and B. Krautler.
1998.
How a protein prepares for B12 binding: structure and dynamics of the B12-binding subunit of glutamate mutase from Clostridium tetanomorphum.
Structure
6:1021-1033[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Wedler, F. C.,
F. M. Hoffmann,
R. Kenney, and J. Carfi.
1976.
Maintenance of specificity, information, and thermostability in thermophilic Bacillus sp. glutamine synthetases.
Experentia Suppl.
26:187-197.
|
| 23.
|
Woolfolk, C. A.,
B. Shapiro, and E. R. Stadtman.
1966.
Regulation of glutamine synthetase. I. Purification and properties of glutamine synthetase from Escherichia coli.
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
116:177-192[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2001, p. 4458-4463, Vol. 67, No. 10
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.10.4458-4463.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.