Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2001, p. 5431-5436, Vol. 67, No. 12
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.12.5431-5436.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Prevalence of Campylobacter spp.,
Escherichia coli, and Salmonella Serovars in
Retail Chicken, Turkey, Pork, and Beef from the Greater Washington,
D.C., Area
Cuiwei
Zhao,1
Beilei
Ge,1
Juan
De
Villena,1
Robert
Sudler,1,
Emily
Yeh,1
Shaohua
Zhao,2
David G.
White,2
David
Wagner,2 and
Jianghong
Meng1,*
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of
Maryland, College Park, Maryland 207421
and Division of Animal and Food Microbiology, Center for
Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, Maryland
207082
Received 3 August 2001/Accepted 26 September 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
A total of 825 samples of retail raw meats (chicken, turkey, pork,
and beef) were examined for the presence of Escherichia coli and Salmonella serovars, and 719 of these
samples were also tested for Campylobacter spp. The
samples were randomly obtained from 59 stores of four supermarket
chains during 107 sampling visits in the Greater Washington, D.C., area
from June 1999 to July 2000. The majority (70.7%) of chicken samples
(n = 184) were contaminated with
Campylobacter, and a large percentage of the stores
visited (91%) had Campylobacter-contaminated chickens. Approximately 14% of the 172 turkey samples yielded
Campylobacter, whereas fewer pork (1.7%) and beef
(0.5%) samples were positive for this pathogen. A total of 722 Campylobacter isolates were obtained from 159 meat
samples; 53.6% of these isolates were Campylobacter jejuni, 41.3% were Campylobacter coli, and
5.1% were other species. Of the 212 chicken samples, 82 (38.7%)
yielded E. coli, while 19.0% of the beef samples,
16.3% of the pork samples, and 11.9% of the turkey samples were
positive for E. coli. However, only 25 (3.0%) of the
retail meat samples tested were positive for Salmonella.
Significant differences in the bacterial contamination rates were
observed for the four supermarket chains. This study revealed that
retail raw meats are often contaminated with food-borne pathogens;
however, there are marked differences in the prevalence of such
pathogens in different meats. Raw retail meats are potential vehicles
for transmitting food-borne diseases, and our findings stress the need
for increased implementation of hazard analysis of critical
control point (HACCP) and consumer food safety education efforts.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Microbial food safety is an
increasing public health concern worldwide. It is estimated that each
year in the United States there are approximately 76 million food-borne
illnesses (23). While most of these illnesses are
undiagnosed and thus unreported, approximately 325,000 cases result in
hospitalization, and 5,000 cases are fatal. Nearly 2.4 million cases
are caused by Campylobacter spp., 1.4 million cases are
caused by nontyphoidal Salmonella serovars, and 270,000 cases are caused by pathogenic Escherichia coli, including
E. coli O157:H7 (23). Although these pathogens usually cause mild to moderate self-limiting gastroenteritis, invasive
diseases and complications may occur, resulting in more severe cases.
For example, Campylobacter has been identified as the
predominant cause of Guillain-Barré syndrome and reactive arthritis (3). Systemic salmonellosis infections can be
life threatening, and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC),
particularly E. coli O157:H7, can cause bloody diarrhea and
hemolytic uremic syndrome (12).
Campylobacter, Salmonella, and pathogenic
E. coli all colonize the gastrointestinal tracts of a wide
range of wild and domestic animals, especially animals raised for human
consumption (24). Food contamination with these pathogens
can occur at multiple steps along the food chain, including production,
processing, distribution, retail marketing, and handling or
preparation. Numerous epidemiological reports have implicated foods of
animal origin as the major vehicles associated with illnesses caused by
food-borne pathogens (30, 34). Contaminated raw or
undercooked poultry and red meats are particularly important in
transmitting these food-borne pathogens. Other sources of human
infections with Campylobacter, Salmonella, and
STEC include contaminated produce and contact with farm animals and
pets. Person-to-person transmission has also been described
(33).
Studies worldwide have shown that Campylobacter,
Salmonella, and E. coli are often present in
fresh meat and poultry (34). However, there is a paucity
of data concerning the prevalence of contamination with multiple
food-borne pathogens in retail meats in the United States. The
objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of
Campylobacter, Salmonella, and E. coli
in retail raw meats obtained in the Greater Washington, D.C., area and
to investigate the association of microbial contamination with product
type, season, and supermarket chain.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Sample collection and preparation.
Meat samples
(n = 825), including chicken carcasses, turkey breasts,
beef steaks, and pork chops, were randomly collected from retail stores
of four supermarket chains in the Greater Washington, D.C., area,
including suburban Maryland. Stores of the four supermarket chains in
the area were identified by using phone books, store web sites, and
store maps. Each store was assigned an identification number in order
to form a store database. Sampling visits were made on every other
Monday for 14 months (June 1999 to July 2000). On each sampling day,
four stores were randomly chosen from the store database by using a
statistical program (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.). Eight prepackaged
raw meat products (two of each meat type) were randomly selected and
transported on ice to the laboratory. Each sample was aseptically
removed and placed in a plastic bag that contained 200 to 500 ml of
buffered peptone (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.), depending on the
sample size. The bag was shaken manually for 3 min and left on ice for 20 min. The rinse solution was used for isolation of
Campylobacter, E. coli, and
Salmonella.
Bacterial isolation.
Modifications of methods described in
the Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical
Manual were used to isolate Campylobacter,
E. coli, and Salmonella from the retail raw meat samples (11). Isolation and culturing of
Campylobacter were always conducted with the AnaeroPak
system (Mitsubish Gas Chemical Co., Inc., Osaka, Japan) under
microaerophilic conditions created by using a 10%
CO2-10% H2-80%
N2 gas mixture and Campy pack (Becton Dickinson,
Cockeysville, Md.). A 20-ml portion of a meat sample rinse solution was
mixed with the same volume of double-concentrated Bolton broth (Oxoid
Inc., Ogdensburg, N.Y.) and incubated at 42°C overnight with shaking.
The overnight enrichment broth was used to inoculate
Campylobacter onto blood-free selective agar (Oxoid) plates
using a cotton swab. After 48 h of incubation at 42°C, the
plates were examined for typical Campylobacter colonies,
which were small, gray, and droplike or small and shiny or
slimy. Presumptive Campylobacter colonies were
subcultured on blood agar plates and incubated for 48 h at 42°C.
Single colonies (3-5) on a blood agar plate were selected
for Gram staining and oxidase and catalase tests.
For isolation of E. coli, 200 µl of a meat rinse solution
was streaked onto MacConkey agar (Difco) plates and incubated at 35°C
for 24 h. Following incubation, lactose-positive colonies (3-5) were streaked onto eosin-methylene blue (Difco)
agar plates. Typical E. coli colonies on eosin-methylene
blue agar (green and shiny or with dark or purple centers) were
subcultured in 10 ml of Trypticase soy broth (Difco) and incubated for
24 h at 37°C. The broth cultures were tested for indole
production, and indole-positive cultures were confirmed to be E. coli by using API 20E (Biomerieux Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.).
To isolate
Salmonella, 20 ml of a meat rinse solution was
mixed with the same volume of double-concentrated lactose broth
(Difco). After incubation at 35°C for 24 h, 1.0 ml of the
enrichment
broth was transferred into 9.0 ml of tetrathionate broth and
incubated
at 42°C for 24 h. Following 24 h of incubation,
the broth culture
was streaked onto XLT4 (Difco) agar plates and
incubated for 24
h at 37°C. Presumptive
Salmonella
colonies (
3-5) on an XLT4 plate
were selected and used to
inoculate triple sugar iron (Difco)
slants, which were then incubated
for 24 h at 37°C. The identities
of
Salmonella
isolates were confirmed by using API
20E.
PCR assays.
Presumptive Campylobacter isolates
that were gram-negative, curved organisms as determined by microscopic
examination and were oxidase and catalase positive were to be confirmed
members of the genus Campylobacter by performing a PCR
assay. Primers BO4263 and BO4264 amplified a 256-bp unique fragment of
Campylobacter genomes (17). A multiplex PCR
method, based on two PCR assays described by Linton et al., were
developed to identify Campylobacter species with primers HIP
400F and HIP 1134R for Campylobacter jejuni and primers
CC18F and CC519R for Campylobacter coli (20). Multiplex PCR assays were also performed for E. coli to
identify genes encoding Shiga toxins 1 and 2 and heat-labile and
heat-stable enterotoxins (17, 25, 36). The targets, primer
sequences, and sizes of amplicons for the PCR assays are shown in Table
1.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Targets and oligonucleotide primers used in PCR assays
for identification of Campylobacter and virulence genes
of E. coli isolated from retail meats
|
|
The PCR procedures used have been described previously (
20,
26). Briefly, bacterial templates were prepared by heating
broth
cultures at 98°C for 10 min. PCR reagents were obtained
from PE
Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif. Each PCR mixture
consisted of
1× reaction buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl
2, 200 µM
(each) dATP,
dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP, 10 pmol of each primer, 1 U of
AmpliTaq
polymerase, and 10 µl of bacterial template. Deionized water
was
added to bring the final volume to 50 µl. The PCR was performed
with a thermal cycler (GeneAmp PCR System 9600; Perkin-Elmer,
Norwalk,
Conn.) by using 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for
1 min, primer
annealing at 60°C for 1 min, and primer extension
at 72°C for 1 min. PCR products were stained with ethidium bromide
and visualized
under UV light after gel electrophoresis on 2%
agarose.
Data analysis.
Prevalence data for the microorganisms sorted
by meat type, season, and store chain were analyzed by using the
analysis of variance of SAS for Windows (version 6.12; SAS Institute
Inc.).
 |
RESULTS |
Fifty-nine stores, including 29 chain A stores, 17 chain B stores,
9 chain C stores, and 4 chain D stores, were visited a total of 107 times from June 1999 to July 2000. Thirty of these stores were visited
once, 15 stores were visited twice, 9 stores were visited three times,
and 5 stores were visited four times. A total of 825 samples of retail
raw meats were collected and examined for the presence of E. coli and Salmonella; 719 of these samples were also
tested for the presence of Campylobacter. (Table 2).
Prevalence of Campylobacter, E. coli,
and Salmonella.
Table 2 shows the prevalence of
Campylobacter, E. coli, and Salmonella
in retail chicken, turkey, pork, and beef obtained from the 59 stores.
Of the four raw meat products, chicken was most frequently contaminated
with Campylobacter (70.7%), followed by turkey (14.5%).
Compared to poultry, red meats had much lower rates of contamination
with Campylobacter. Less than 1% of beef samples and less
than 2% of pork samples were positive for this pathogen. Chicken also
had the highest rate of E. coli contamination (38.7%).
Interestingly, beef (19.0%) and pork (16.3%) were more likely
contaminated with E. coli than turkey was (11.9%). In
contrast, Salmonella was isolated from only 3.0% of the 825 meat samples, and chicken had the highest rate of Salmonella
contamination (4.2%).
A number of meat samples were contaminated either with
Campylobacter and
E. coli or with
Campylobacter and
Salmonella. Of
184 chicken
samples tested, 54 (29.3%) were contaminated with
both
Campylobacter and
E. coli, and 2 were positive
for all three
bacteria. Only five pork samples and four turkey samples
had more
than one type of organism present. The five pork samples
contained
E. coli and
Salmonella, whereas only
one turkey sample contained
E. coli and
Salmonella. Two turkey samples were contaminated with
Campylobacter and
E. coli, and one turkey sample
was contaminated
with
Campylobacter and
Salmonella. In contrast, none of the beef
samples contained
detectable numbers of more than one of the three
enteric
bacteria.
Isolation of Campylobacter, E. coli, and
Salmonella sorted by store and supermarket chain.
Most (91%) of the stores during 92 sampling visits had
Campylobacter-contaminated chicken. Only 22 (24%) of
the store visits yielded Campylobacter-positive turkey
samples. E. coli was recovered from chicken after nearly
60% of 106 store visits, whereas E. coli was recovered
from pork, beef, and turkey after 24, 23, and 19% of the store visits,
respectively. However, very few stores had
Campylobacter-contaminated beef (1%) or pork (3%). Due
to the low prevalence of Salmonella, no significant
difference was observed among the stores that were positive for the
presence of Salmonella regardless of the type of meat tested.
During the 14-month sample collection period, five stores of three
supermarket chains were visited four times. Regardless
of the store
visited,
Campylobacter was repeatedly found in one
or two of
the two chicken samples analyzed except for the initial
visit to one
store. Chicken samples were also frequently (60%
of the visits)
contaminated with
E. coli. Salmonella, however,
was isolated
only from one turkey sample and one beef sample from
one store after
the fourth
visit.
The microbial contamination rates for the four supermarket chains
ranged from 20.6 to 32.6% for
Campylobacter, from 18.1 to
28.3% for
E. coli, and from 0 to 3.4% for
Salmonella (Table
3).
Similar
to the findings obtained when the retail meats were compared,
there
were not significant differences in the levels of
Salmonella contamination among the four chains. However, the
Campylobacter and
E. coli contamination rates for
the four supermarket chains
were significantly different
(
P < 0.05). Chain D had higher microbial
contamination
rates for both
Campylobacter and
E. coli than
chains
A and B and a higher
E. coli contamination rate than
chain C.
PCR results for Campylobacter identification and
E. coli toxins.
A total of 722 isolates (three to
five isolates per sample) from 159 meat samples that were presumptively
Campylobacter positive (Table
4) were identified based on Gram staining
and oxidase and catalase tests. A PCR assay specific for C. jejuni, C. coli, and Campylobacter upsaliensis
confirmed that almost all of the isolates were Campylobacter
isolates; the only exceptions were three isolates from chicken and one
isolate from turkey. Approximately one-half (53.6%) of the isolates
were identified as C. jejuni, 41.3% were identified as
C. coli, and 5.1% were identified as other species. Both
C. jejuni and C. coli were isolated more
frequently from retail chicken than from turkey, pork, or beef (Table
4). Interestingly, C. coli was recovered more often from
retail turkey samples than C. jejuni was. Twenty retail meat
samples (18 chicken samples, one turkey sample, and one pork sample)
contained more than one Campylobacter species. Two chicken
samples yielded three species of Campylobacter. Most of
these retail meat samples were collected from different stores or at
different times.
Based on the PCR assays specific for genes encoding Shiga toxins and
enterotoxins of
E. coli, none of the 179
E. coli
isolates
tested possessed Shiga toxin genes, whereas one pork isolate
was
positive for the heat-labile enterotoxin and two isolates (one
pork
isolate and one beef isolate) were positive for the heat-stable
enterotoxins (data not
shown).
Seasonality component.
The prevalence of Campylobacter,
Salmonella, and E. coli in the four meats varied during
the 14-month sampling period (Fig 1).
However, no seasonality component was observed, and these enteric
pathogens were found in retail meats in both warm and cold months.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Prevalence of Campylobacter, E.
coli, and Salmonella in raw chicken, turkey,
pork, and beef samples from four retail supermarket chains in the
Greater Washington area from June 1999 to July 2000. Examination of
samples for Campylobacter contamination started in
August 1999.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The present study demonstrated that three major enteric bacterial
taxa were present in retail raw meat products obtained from supermarkets in the Greater Washington, D.C., area, including suburban
Maryland, over a 14-month period. Chicken carcasses, turkey breasts,
beef steaks, and pork chops were used because they are widely available
in grocery stores and are representative of meat products that are
handled and prepared in the raw state in domestic kitchens.
Additionally, these retail meats are often associated with direct
hand-to-mouth exposure to enteric pathogens and cross-contamination of
the kitchen environment and ready-to-eat foods.
Several studies have indicated that Campylobacter is present
in retail raw meats. Raw poultry meats are commonly contaminated with
Campylobacter; this is particularly true of chicken
products, and the rates of contamination that have been reported are as high as 100% (1, 2). The reported rates of contamination of pork products vary from 1.3% in the United States (10)
to 2% in Belgium (18) and 16.9% in Canada
(14). The prevalence of Campylobacter in beef
is generally low (22, 28). Other studies demonstrated that
this pathogen was isolated from only 2 to 10% of the beef samples
tested (18, 29). The lower levels of
Campylobacter in pork and beef may be due to a lower
incidence of these organisms in swine and cattle populations than in
poultry, as well as the sensitivity of Campylobacter to
atmospheric oxygen and other environmental stresses during transport,
processing, and storage of the products tested. Our study also
indicated that multiple Campylobacter species are present in
raw meats, which has also been observed in other studies (16, 19,
27). More than one species of Campylobacter was
identified in 20 meat samples (primarily chicken samples). It is likely
that different serotypes or genotypes of the same species (multiple
clones) can also be present in one sample, which presents a challenge
to molecular subtyping methods used for epidemiological or outbreak
investigations. Recent studies have also suggested that coinfection
with multiple strains of Campylobacter occurs in 5 to 10%
of human cases of acute enteritis (19). Therefore, it is
important that more than one bacterial colony per sample be selected
for identification and subtyping of Campylobacter. Multiple
isolates may be obtained from different isolation steps, such as direct
selective plating and selective enrichment, and/or may be identified on
the basis of variations in colonial morphology. The
Campylobacter isolates recovered in this study are now being
analyzed by ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to gain a
better understanding of the population genetics of these organisms.
The rates of microbial contamination of retail meats with E. coli in this study ranged from 39% for chicken samples to 12% for turkey samples. The rates of E. coli contamination in
the different retail meats were not as dissimilar as the rates observed for Campylobacter contamination. This may have been due to
the frequent presence of E. coli in the animal production
and food processing environments. In fact, all but three E. coli isolates identified in this study were negative for
virulence-associated Shiga toxin or enterotoxin genes. This most likely
indicates that the E. coli isolates identified were part of
the normal enteric flora that is present in animals and often
identified in food production, processing, and distribution
environments. The absence of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli
strains in the retail meats analyzed in this study is interesting.
Several studies have shown that E. coli O157:H7 and other
STEC are present in retail meat products, mostly beef products
(5, 6, 9, 15, 31). It is likely that STEC could have been
recovered from the meat samples tested if an enrichment procedure had
been used in this study. However, the overall aim of our research was
to investigate general E. coli contamination of retail
meats. Also, our study was not designed to determine the levels of
microbial contamination in retail meats; hence, our results might not
reflect contamination levels.
The reported prevalence of Salmonella in retail meats varies
widely in different countries. Salmonella is found less
frequently in retail meats in developed countries, although as much as
36% of poultry meat samples were contaminated in a recent study in Belgium (35) and 43% of poultry meat samples were
contaminated in a previous study in the United States (4).
The rates of Salmonella contamination in pork and beef
appear to be much lower, ranging from 0.8 to 10.4% in the United
States (10, 32). The difference could be due in part to
the types of samples analyzed (whole birds versus steaks; fresh versus
frozen). The results of this study indicate that the rates of
Salmonella contamination in retail meat samples were low,
ranging from 1.9% for beef samples to 4.2% for chicken samples.
The Centers for Disease Control Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance
Network (FoodNet) data indicate that outbreaks and clusters of
food-borne infections peak during the warmest months of the year
(7). The reasons for this seasonal pattern are not known,
but they may include (i) increased prevalence of the pathogens in
cattle or other livestock or vehicles of transmission during the
summer; (ii) greater human exposure to contaminated foods during the
cook-out months; and/or (ii) more improper handling (e.g.,
temperature abuse) or incomplete cooking of products, such as ground
beef, during warm months. Some studies also have shown that the rate of
microbial contamination of food products follows the same trend
(8, 13, 37). Our results did not provide a clear picture
of a seasonality component of microbial contamination of retail meats.
It does appear that more meat samples were positive for
Campylobacter and E. coli contamination in some
of the traditionally warmer months. However, no significant difference
in microbial meat contamination was observed when data for warm and
cold months were compared. In fact, the rates of Salmonella
contamination were higher in cold months than in warm months. This may
be explained by the fact that the Salmonella contamination
rates in our study were too low to draw any statistically significant
conclusions. The findings of this research suggest that future food
safety studies focusing on seasonality components may require larger sample sizes and longer analysis periods. An interesting finding of the
present study was that the rates of enteric organism contamination of
retail meats, particularly chicken carcasses, were significantly different for the four supermarket chains, although all 59 stores of
the four chains sold the same product brands. The possible explanations
for this finding include differences in store handling practices,
sampling times, and product batches. Most studies of retail meats have
involved isolation and identification of multiple organisms in
different products. We believe that our study was the first study in
which the same retail meat samples were examined for
Campylobacter, Salmonella, and E. coli
contamination in the United States. In a recent study of microbial
contamination of pork retail products, the researchers collected
samples from six cities in the United States; however, no information
concerning differences in store contamination rates in the six cities
was given (10). In conclusion, we found that retail raw
meats were often contaminated with Campylobacter and
E. coli and less often contaminated with
Salmonella. The contamination was dependent on the type of
meat. Some retail meats were also contaminated with more than one
food-borne pathogen. The presence of Campylobacter and
Salmonella in retail meats remains a significant public
health concern. Our data confirm that raw retail meats may be vehicles for transmitting food-borne diseases. To diminish
Campylobacter, E. coli, and Salmonella
contamination rates in retail meats, it is critical that risk reduction
strategies are used throughout the food chain. These strategies include
on-farm practices that reduce pathogen carriage, increased hygiene at
both slaughter and meat processing, continued implementation of HACCP
systems, and increased consumer education efforts. Additionally,
consumption of undercooked meat products and cross-contamination during
food handling and preparation must be avoided to ensure food safety at
home and in the food service industry. Further research focusing on
effective prevention of food-borne illness is essential for developing
intervention and mitigation strategies to reduce the presence of
food-borne bacterial pathogens at the retail level.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are indebted to Robert D. Walker from the Division of Animal
and Food Microbiology, Center for Veterinary Medicine, U. S. Food
and Drug Administration, for his assistance and comments during
preparation of the manuscript.
This study was supported in part by a grant from the Maryland
Agricultural Experimental Station.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Nutrition and Food Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. Phone: (301) 405-1399. Fax: (301) 314-9327. E-mail:
jm332{at}umail.umd.edu.
Present address: Department of Health, District of Columbia,
Washington, DC 20020.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Atanassova, V., and C. Ring.
1999.
Prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in poultry and poultry meat in Germany.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
51:187-190[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Baker, R. C.,
M. D. Paredes, and R. A. Qureshi.
1987.
Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in eggs and poultry meat in New York State.
Poult. Sci.
66:1766-1770[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Blaser, M. J.
1997.
Epidemiologic and clinical features of Campylobacter jejuni infections.
J. Infect. Dis
176(Suppl. 2):S103-S105.
|
| 4.
|
Bokanyi, R. P., Jr.,
J. F. Stephens, and D. N. Foster.
1990.
Isolation and characterization of Salmonella from broiler carcasses or parts.
Poult. Sci.
69:592-598[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Bolton, F. J.,
L. Crozier, and J. K. Williamson.
1996.
Isolation of Escherichia coli O157 from raw meat products.
Lett. Appl. Microbiol.
23:317-321[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Brooks, H. J.,
B. D. Mollison,
K. A. Bettelheim,
K. Matejka,
K. A. Paterson, and V. K. Ward.
2001.
Occurrence and virulence factors of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in retail meat in Dunedin, New Zealand.
Lett. Appl. Microbiol.
32:118-122[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
2001.
Preliminary FoodNet data on the incidence of foodborne illnesses-selected sites, United States, 2000.
Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.
50:241-246[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Chapman, P. A.,
A. T. Cerdan Malo,
M. Ellin,
R. Ashton, and Harkin.
2001.
Escherichia coli O157 in cattle and sheep at slaughter, on beef and lamb carcasses and in raw beef and lamb products in South Yorkshire, UK.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
64:139-150[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Doyle, M. P., and J. L. Schoeni.
1987.
Isolation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from retail fresh meats and poultry.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
53:2394-2396[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Duffy, E. A.,
K. E. Belk,
J. N. Sofos,
G. R. Bellinger,
A. Pape, and G. C. Smith.
2001.
Extent of microbial contamination in United States pork retail products.
J. Food Prot.
64:172-178[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Food and Drug Administration.
1998.
Bacteriological analytical manual, 8th ed.
(rev. A). AOAC International, Gaithersburg, Md.
|
| 12.
|
Griffin, P. M.
1995.
Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli, p. 739-761.
In
M. J. Blaser, P. D. Smith, J. I. Ravdin, H. B. Greenberg, and R. L. Guerrant (ed.), Infections of gastrointestinal tract. Raven Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 13.
|
Hanninen, M. L.,
P. Perko-Makela,
A. Pitkala, and H. Rautelin.
2000.
A three-year study of Campylobacter jejuni genotypes in humans with domestically acquired infections and in chicken samples from the Helsinki area.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:1998-2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Hariharan, H.,
T. Wright, and J. R. Long.
1990.
Isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni from slaughter hogs.
Microbiologica
13:1-6[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Heuvelink, A. E.,
K. Wernars, and E. De Boer.
1996.
Occurrence of Escherichia coli O157 and other verocytotoxin-producing E. coli in retail raw meats in the Netherlands.
J. Food Prot.
59:1267-1272.
|
| 16.
|
Hudson, J. A.,
C. Nicol,
J. Wright,
R. Whyte, and S. K. Hasell.
1999.
Seasonal variation of Campylobacter types from human cases, veterinary cases, raw chicken, milk and water.
J. Appl. Microbiol.
87:115-124[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Jackson, C. J.,
A. J. Fox, and D. M. Jones.
1996.
A novel polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection and speciation of thermophilic Campylobacter spp.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
81:467-473[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Korsak, N.,
G. Daube,
Y. Ghafir,
A. Chahed,
S. Jolly, and H. Vindevogel.
1998.
An efficient sampling technique used to detect four foodborne pathogens on pork and beef carcasses in nine Belgian abattoirs.
J. Food Prot.
61:535-541[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Kramer, J. M.,
J. A. Frost,
F. J. Bolton, and D. R. Wareing.
2000.
Campylobacter contamination of raw meat and poultry at retail sale: identification of multiple types and comparison with isolates from human infection.
J. Food Prot.
63:1654-1659[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Linton, D.,
A. J. Lawson,
R. J. Owen, and J. Stanley.
1997.
PCR detection, identification to species level, and fingerprinting of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli direct from diarrheic samples.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:2568-2572[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Lortie, L. A.,
J. D. Dubreuil, and J. Harel.
1991.
Characterization of Escherichia coli strains producing heat-stable enterotoxin b (STb) isolated from humans with diarrhea.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:656-659[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Madden, R. H.,
L. Moran, and P. Scates.
1998.
Frequency of occurrence of Campylobacter spp. in red meats and poultry in Northern Ireland and their subsequent subtyping using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism and the random amplified polymorphic DNA method.
J. Appl. Microbiol.
84:703-708[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Mead, P. S.,
L. Slutsker,
V. Dietz,
L. F. McCaig,
J. S. Bresee,
C. Shapiro,
P. M. Griffin, and R. V. Tauxe.
1999.
Food-related illness and death in the United States.
Emerg. Infect. Dis.
5:607-625[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Meng, J., and M. P. Doyle.
1998.
Emerging and evolving microbial foodborne pathogens.
Bull. Inst. Pasteur
96:151-164[CrossRef].
|
| 25.
|
Meng, J.,
S. Zhao,
M. Doyle,
S. Mitchell, and S. Kresovich.
1997.
A multiplex PCR for identifying Shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7.
Lett. Appl. Microbiol.
24:172-176[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Meng, J.,
S. Zhao, and M. P. Doyle.
1998.
Virulence genes of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from food, animals and humans.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
45:229-235[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Nielsen, E. M., and N. L. Nielsen.
1999.
Serotypes and typability of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from poultry products.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
46:199-205[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Ono, K., and K. Yamamoto.
1999.
Contamination of meat with Campylobacter jejuni in Saitama, Japan.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
47:211-219[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Osano, O., and S. M. Arimi.
1999.
Retail poultry and beef as sources of Campylobacter jejuni.
East Afr. Med. J.
76:141-143[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Petersen, K. E., and W. O. James.
1998.
Agents, vehicles, and causal inference in bacterial foodborne disease outbreaks: 82 reports (1986-1995).
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
212:1874-1881[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Samadpour, M.,
J. E. Ongerth,
J. Liston,
N. Tran,
D. Nguyen,
T. S. Whittam,
R. A. Wilson, and P. I. Tarr.
1994.
Occurrence of Shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli in retail fresh seafood, beef, lamb, pork, and poultry from grocery stores in Seattle, Washington.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
60:1038-1040[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Sofos, J. N.,
S. L. Kochevar,
J. O. Reagan, and G. C. Smith.
1999.
Incidence of Salmonella on beef carcasses relating to the U.S. meat and poultry inspection regulations.
J. Food Prot.
62:467-473[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Tauxe, R. V.
1997.
Emerging foodborne diseases: an evolving public health challenge.
Emerg. Infect. Dis.
3:425-434[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Todd, E. C.
1997.
Epidemiology of foodborne diseases: a worldwide review.
World Health Stat. Q
50:30-50[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Uyttendaele, M.,
P. De Troy, and J. Debevere.
1999.
Incidence of Salmonella, Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, and Listeria monocytogenes in poultry carcasses and different types of poultry products for sale on the Belgian retail market.
J. Food Prot.
62:735-740[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Victor, T.,
R. du Toit,
J. van Zyl,
A. J. Bester, and P. D. van Helden.
1991.
Improved method for the routine identification of toxigenic Escherichia coli by DNA amplification of a conserved region of the heat-labile toxin A subunit.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:158-161[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Willis, W. L., and C. Murray.
1997.
Campylobacter jejuni seasonal recovery observations of retail market broilers.
Poult. Sci.
76:314-317[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2001, p. 5431-5436, Vol. 67, No. 12
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.12.5431-5436.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Rotariu, O., Dallas, J. F., Ogden, I. D., MacRae, M., Sheppard, S. K., Maiden, M. C. J., Gormley, F. J., Forbes, K. J., Strachan, N. J. C.
(2009). Spatiotemporal Homogeneity of Campylobacter Subtypes from Cattle and Sheep across Northeastern and Southwestern Scotland. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
75: 6275-6281
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hakkinen, M., Nakari, U.-M., Siitonen, A.
(2009). Chickens and Cattle as Sources of Sporadic Domestically Acquired Campylobacter jejuni Infections in Finland. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
75: 5244-5249
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Poole, T., Crippen, T.
(2009). Conjugative plasmid transfer between Salmonella enterica Newport and Escherichia coli within the gastrointestinal tract of the lesser mealworm beetle, Alphitobius diaperinus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Poult. Sci.
88: 1553-1558
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bosilevac, J. M., Guerini, M. N., Kalchayanand, N., Koohmaraie, M.
(2009). Prevalence and Characterization of Salmonellae in Commercial Ground Beef in the United States. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
75: 1892-1900
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Oliver, S. P., Patel, D. A., Callaway, T. R., Torrence, M. E.
(2009). ASAS Centennial Paper: Developments and future outlook for preharvest food safety. J ANIM SCI
87: 419-437
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zheng, J., Meng, J., Zhao, S., Singh, R., Song, W.
(2008). Campylobacter-Induced Interleukin-8 Secretion in Polarized Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells Requires Campylobacter-Secreted Cytolethal Distending Toxin- and Toll-Like Receptor-Mediated Activation of NF-{kappa}B. Infect. Immun.
76: 4498-4508
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Khanna, R., Waechter, L., Sargeant, J., Clark, W. F., Garg, A. X.
(2008). Environmental prevention of human disease from verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli. Nephrol Dial Transplant
23: 1819-1822
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hannis, J. C., Manalili, S. M., Hall, T. A., Ranken, R., White, N., Sampath, R., Blyn, L. B., Ecker, D. J., Mandrell, R. E., Fagerquist, C. K., Bates, A. H., Miller, W. G., Hofstadler, S. A.
(2008). High-Resolution Genotyping of Campylobacter Species by Use of PCR and High-Throughput Mass Spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol.
46: 1220-1225
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Callaway, T. R., Edrington, T. S., Anderson, R. C., Byrd, J. A., Nisbet, D. J.
(2008). Gastrointestinal microbial ecology and the safety of our food supply as related to Salmonella. J ANIM SCI
86: E163-E172
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Foley, S. L., Lynne, A. M., Nayak, R.
(2008). Salmonella challenges: Prevalence in swine and poultry and potential pathogenicity of such isolates. J ANIM SCI
86: E149-E162
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Weingarten, R. A., Grimes, J. L., Olson, J. W.
(2008). Role of Campylobacter jejuni Respiratory Oxidases and Reductases in Host Colonization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 1367-1375
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Baurhoo, B., Letellier, A., Zhao, X., Ruiz-Feria, C. A.
(2007). Cecal Populations of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria and Escherichia coli Populations After In Vivo Escherichia coli Challenge in Birds Fed Diets with Purified Lignin or Mannanoligosaccharides. Poult. Sci.
86: 2509-2516
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Van, T. T. H., Moutafis, G., Istivan, T., Tran, L. T., Coloe, P. J.
(2007). Detection of Salmonella spp. in Retail Raw Food Samples from Vietnam and Characterization of Their Antibiotic Resistance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
73: 6885-6890
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Belanger, A. E., Shryock, T. R.
(2007). Macrolide-resistant Campylobacter: the meat of the matter. J Antimicrob Chemother
60: 715-723
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hussein, H. S.
(2007). Prevalence and pathogenicity of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in beef cattle and their products. J ANIM SCI
85: E63-E72
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mehyar, G. F., Han, J. H., Holley, R. A., Blank, G., Hydamaka, A.
(2007). Suitability of Pea Starch and Calcium Alginate as Antimicrobial Coatings on Chicken Skin. Poult. Sci.
86: 386-393
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cole, K., Farnell, M. B., Donoghue, A. M., Stern, N. J., Svetoch, E. A., Eruslanov, B. N., Volodina, L. I., Kovalev, Y. N., Perelygin, V. V., Mitsevich, E. V., Mitsevich, I. P., Levchuk, V. P., Pokhilenko, V. D., Borzenkov, V. N., Svetoch, O. E., Kudryavtseva, T. Y., Reyes-Herrera, I., Blore, P. J., de los Santos, F. S., Donoghue, D. J.
(2006). Bacteriocins reduce campylobacter colonization and alter gut morphology in turkey poults.. Poult. Sci.
85: 1570-1575
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gulmez, M., Oral, N., Vatansever, L.
(2006). The Effect of Water Extract of Sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) and Lactic Acid on Decontamination and Shelf Life of Raw Broiler Wings. Poult. Sci.
85: 1466-1471
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Griggs, J. P., Bender, J. B., Jacob, J. P.
(2006). Microbial Safety of Chickens Raised Without Antibiotics. J. Appl. Poult. Res.
15: 475-482
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Besser, T. E., LeJeune, J. T., Rice, D. H., Berg, J., Stilborn, R. P., Kaya, K., Bae, W., Hancock, D. D.
(2005). Increasing Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in Feedlot Cattle through the Feeding Period. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 5752-5758
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ge, B., McDermott, P. F., White, D. G., Meng, J.
(2005). Role of Efflux Pumps and Topoisomerase Mutations in Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 3347-3354
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nannapaneni, R., Story, R., Wiggins, K. C., Johnson, M. G.
(2005). Concurrent Quantitation of Total Campylobacter and Total Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Campylobacter Loads in Rinses from Retail Raw Chicken Carcasses from 2001 to 2003 by Direct Plating at 42{degrees}C. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 4510-4515
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cui, S., Ge, B., Zheng, J., Meng, J.
(2005). Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 4108-4111
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Workman, S. N., Mathison, G. E., Lavoie, M. C.
(2005). Pet Dogs and Chicken Meat as Reservoirs of Campylobacter spp. in Barbados. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 2642-2650
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Louis, V. R., Gillespie, I. A., O'Brien, S. J., Russek-Cohen, E., Pearson, A. D., Colwell, R. R.
(2005). Temperature-Driven Campylobacter Seasonality in England and Wales. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 85-92
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shea, K. M., Committee on Environmental Health, , Committee on Infectious Diseases,
(2004). Nontherapeutic Use of Antimicrobial Agents in Animal Agriculture: Implications for Pediatrics. Pediatrics
114: 862-868
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tollefson, L.
(2004). Factual errors in review article. J Antimicrob Chemother
54: 271-271
[Full Text]
-
Phillips, I., Casewell, M., Cox, T., De Groot, B., Friis, C., Jones, R., Nightingale, C., Preston, R., Waddell, J.
(2004). Does the use of antibiotics in food animals pose a risk to human health? A critical review of published data. J Antimicrob Chemother
53: 28-52
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hong, Y., Berrang, M. E., Liu, T., Hofacre, C. L., Sanchez, S., Wang, L., Maurer, J. J.
(2003). Rapid Detection of Campylobacter coli, C. jejuni, and Salmonella enterica on Poultry Carcasses by Using PCR-Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 3492-3499
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ge, B., White, D. G., McDermott, P. F., Girard, W., Zhao, S., Hubert, S., Meng, J.
(2003). Antimicrobial-Resistant Campylobacter Species from Retail Raw Meats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 3005-3007
[Abstract]
[Full Text]