Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2001, p. 5551-5557, Vol. 67, No. 12
Institute of Medical Microbiology, University
of Münster, 48149 Münster,1 and
Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of
Veterinary Medicine, 30173 Hannover,2 Germany,
and Centre National de Référence des
Toxémies à Staphylocoques EA 1655, Faculté de
Médicine R. T. H. Laennec, 69372 Lyon cedex,
France3
Received 18 June 2001/Accepted 26 September 2001
Staphylococcal food poisoning (SFP) caused by
enterotoxigenic staphylococci is one of the main food-borne diseases.
In contrast to Staphylococcus aureus, a systematic
screening for the enterotoxins has not yet been performed on the
genomic level for the coagulase-positive species S.
intermedius. Therefore, the enterotoxigenic potential of
281 different veterinary (canine, n = 247; equine,
n = 23; feline, n = 9; other,
n = 2) and 11 human isolates of S.
intermedius was tested by using a multiplex PCR
DNA-enzyme immunoassay system targeting the staphylococcal enterotoxin
genes sea, seb, sec, sed, and see. Molecular results were
compared by in vitro testing of enterotoxin production by two
immunoassays. A total of 33 (11.3%) S.
intermedius isolates, including 31 (12.6%) canine
isolates, 1 equine isolate, and 1 human isolate, tested positive for
the sec gene. In vitro production of the respective
enterotoxins was detected in 30 (90.9%) of these isolates by using
immunological tests. In contrast, none of 65 veterinary
specimen-derived isolates additionally tested and comprising 13 (sub)species of coagulase-negative staphylococci were found to be
enterotoxigenic. This study shows on both molecular and immunological
levels that a substantial number of S.
intermedius isolates harbor the potential for
enterotoxin production. Since evidence for noninvasive zoonotic
transmission of S. intermedius from
animal hosts to humans has been documented, an enterotoxigenic role of
this microorganism in SFP via contamination of food products may be assumed.
Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs)
are members of a subgroup of related protein exotoxins in the pyrogenic
toxin (PT) family exhibiting a diverse number of shared (e.g.,
superantigenicity) and unique biological activities (7, 18,
42). SEs are distinguishable from other members of the PT family
by their ability to induce emesis and diarrhea when ingested
(17). Thus, they are causative agents in staphylococcal
food poisoning (SFP), one of the main food-borne diseases having major
economic and public health impacts (5, 6, 62). For
Staphylococcus aureus, the production of SEs, such as SEA,
SEB, SEC, SED, and SEE, is well documented (7, 8, 30, 40).
Unlike the situation for S. aureus, only limited
and conflicting data are available regarding enterotoxin production in
non-S. aureus staphylococcal species (10,
23, 25, 46, 52, 57, 63, 65). One of these species, the
coagulase-positive S. intermedius, is the
predominant staphylococcal species isolated from healthy and diseased
dogs and has been isolated from a number of other carnivores, horses,
and birds (16, 36, 54). In single cases, this species
appears to be also responsible, as a zoonotic pathogen, for
canine-inflicted human wound infections and invasive infections in
immunocompromised patients (43, 45, 59, 64). Occasionally, the possession of enterotoxins has been reported for S. intermedius, and its involvement in an outbreak of SFP has
been considered previously (4, 24, 37, 41). Previous
reports regarding S. intermedius enterotoxins
were restricted particularly to immunological procedures, which are
generally limited in sensitivity and known for nonspecific results
(14, 38, 53). DNA hybridization- and amplification-based
approaches offer alternatives to detect staphylococcal isolates bearing
the genetic sequences to produce enterotoxins irrespective of their
toxin expression (56). Hence, there is an obvious need for
a systematic verification of the enterotoxigenic potential of
S. intermedius on a genomic level. For this
purpose, a large panel of veterinary S. intermedius isolates and a control group of different
animal-derived isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) were
tested for the presence of SE-encoding genes by a multiplex PCR
DNA-enzyme immunoassay (DNA-EIA).
(This study was presented in part at the 11th European Congress of
Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Istanbul, Turkey, 2001.)
Bacterial strains.
From September 1999 to August 2000, 1,669 consecutive animal specimens (canine, n = 590; equine,
n = 896; feline, n = 150; other,
n = 33) from the skin or mucosal surfaces of animals
with skin or mucocutaneous infections were investigated (Table
1). The specimens were submitted by
veterinary care centers in northwestern Germany to the Department of
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Veterinary Medicine,
Hannover, Germany. No duplicate isolates were included. In addition, 11 human S. intermedius isolates previously
collected were studied (49).
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.12.5551-5557.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Enterotoxigenic Potential of
Staphylococcus intermedius
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
TABLE 1.
Origin of S. intermedius isolates studied
Identification. Identification was based on growth characteristics on Columbia agar with 5% (vol/vol) sheep blood at 37°C and positive catalase production. The staphylococcal isolates were identified biochemically by the automated ID 32 Staph system (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). The presence of bound or free coagulase was confirmed by latex slide agglutination for clumping factor, protein A, and capsular polysaccharides (Pastorex Staph-Plus; Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur, Marnes-la-Coquette, France). In addition, an in-house slide coagulase test using rabbit and human citrate plasma and a coagulase tube test using rabbit plasma (bioMérieux) were performed. Concerning the S. intermedius isolates, a possible misidentification regarding S. aureus was excluded by PCR for detection of S. aureus-specific nuc and coa genes; both PCR procedures were done with primer pairs as described previously (22, 33).
Media and chemicals. Brain heart infusion broth from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) was used for cultivation of staphylococcal strains. Chemicals were purchased from Amersham Buchler (Braunschweig, Germany) or from Serva (Heidelberg, Germany). All PCR reagents and kits were purchased from Boehringer (Mannheim, Germany). The primers and 5'-biotinylated probes were prepared by MWG Biotech (Ebersberg, Germany).
DNA isolation procedures. Staphylococcal cells were collected from 0.5 ml of an overnight brain heart infusion broth culture. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 5,000 × g for 20 min, resuspended in 185 µl of TE buffer (20 mM Tris chloride, 2 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]) with 15 µl of recombinant lysostaphin (15 mg/ml) (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. DNA was subsequently extracted with a QIAamp tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Nucleic acid samples were eluted with distilled water and adjusted to a final concentration of 1 µg/ml according to A260 values.
Multiplex PCR DNA-EIA. The multiplex PCR DNA-EIA to detect simultaneously the SE-encoding genes (sea, seb, sec1-3, sed, and see) was performed as previously described (9). For carryover prevention, the uracil DNA glycosylase system (Boehringer) was used. The amplification was performed in an automated thermocycler with a hot bonnet (Hybaid, Teddington, United Kingdom). For hybridization of amplified DNA from the multiplex PCR, a generic DNA-EIA (GEN-ETI-K DEIA; Sorin, Saluggia, Italy) was used according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The strips were incubated with an optimized concentration of the biotinylated probes (20 pg/µl for each probe). Reactions were judged as positive if the signal reached or exceeded the cutoff value of 0.150 absorbance units above the mean value of determinations of toxin-negative reference strains. Positive controls included DNA from toxin-producing S. aureus strains (SEA, KN543; SEB, ATCC 14458; SEC, ATCC 19095; SED, ATCC 23235; and SEE, ATCC 27664). In addition to standard PCR controls for contamination events, S. aureus Cowan 1 and S. epidermidis DSM 20044 served as negative controls.
Sequencing of the sec fragment. A 271-bp sec PCR amplification fragment of the S. intermedius strain K1144 was purified by gel filtration (Centri-Sep columns; Princeton Separations, Adelphia, N.J.) followed by direct sequence determination. After thermal cycling with fluorescent dye-labeled terminators using the primers SEC-3 and SEC-4 (9), the nucleotide sequence was determined on an automated DNA sequencer (ABI PRISM 310; Applied Biosystems Division, Perkin-Elmer Corp., Foster City, Calif.). The sequences were analyzed by alignment with known sequences of sec genes of S. aureus (20, 21, 26) and S. intermedius (32) by using OMIGA 2.0 software (Oxford Molecular, Oxford, United Kingdom).
Detection of toxin production. Culture filtrates of the S. intermedius isolates were tested for the presence of SEA to SEE by an EIA (Ridascreen Set A, B, C, D, E; R-Biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany) and, except for SEE, by semiquantitative reversed passive latex agglutination (RPLA; Unipath, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom) assay. For EIA, a cutoff value of 0.150 absorbance units above the mean value of determinations of negative controls was defined as a positive reaction. The RPLA assay was interpreted visually as recommended by the manufacturer.
Statistical analysis. The chi-square test was used to analyze differences between frequencies of isolation of S. intermedius from canine specimens and those for other veterinary specimens. Fisher's exact test (one tailed) was used to assess differences regarding the presence of enterotoxin genes between canine S. intermedius isolates and other animal isolates.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Testing of S. aureus reference
strains.
The multiplex PCR with primer pairs specific for
sea, seb, sec, sed, and
see genes successfully amplified fragments from the DNAs of
S. aureus reference strains (Fig.
1). PCR amplification was confirmed by
respective hybridization reactions in a DNA-EIA system for all
reference strains used. Furthermore, 100% correlation between the
results of the enterotoxin analysis and the detection of the
corresponding gene was observed, as shown for SEC in Table 3. The
sensitivity of the multiplex PCR-EIAs reached the expected range as
previously described (9). None of the primer pairs and the
respective hybridization probes reacted with any of the negative
control strains which also tested negative in both immunoassays.
|
Isolation of S. intermedius. The frequency of isolation of S. intermedius from various specimens of different animals is shown in Table 1. Overall, 281 (16.8%) S. intermedius isolates were collected over 1 year from 1,669 consecutive animal specimens; they consisted of 247 (41.9%) S. intermedius isolates from 590 canine specimens and 34 (3.2%) isolates from 1,079 specimens of other animals (P < 0.0001). Most of the canine S. intermedius isolates (n = 189) were derived from skin specimens.
Detection of enterotoxin genes in S.
intermedius and CNS.
A total of 292 S. intermedius isolates were tested for the possession of
SE-encoding genes. Thirty-three (11.3%) of these isolates were found
to be sec positive by PCR amplification (Tables 2 and 3). Figure 1
shows a representative agarose gel electrophoresis pattern of
sec-positive S. intermedius isolates.
All positive results were confirmed by the sec-specific
DNA-EIA hybridization procedure (Table 3). Except for one equine
isolate, all animal S. intermedius isolates with
positive sec gene amplification were derived from canine
specimens (31 of 247 [12.6%]) (P = 0.07). In
addition, 1 of 11 human S. intermedius isolates
was sec positive (Table 2). None of the S. intermedius isolates tested showed positive amplification
results for the genes encoding enterotoxins SEA, SEB, SED, and SEE.
|
|
Sequencing results.
Representative of the
sec-positive amplification results of canine isolates, a
specific 271-bp amplification fragment of S. intermedius strain K1144 was sequenced directly in both
directions (Fig. 2). Subsequently, the
nucleotide sequence of this fragment was aligned with published
nucleotide sequences of different SEC subtypes. For the sequenced
fragment, 100% identity to the sequence of the canine type of
enterotoxin C (SECcanine) was found
(32). Sequencing of the sec-positive isolates
N940276, derived from human bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and K822,
derived from an equine skin specimen, likewise showed identity with the
seccanine nucleotide sequence (Fig. 2).
|
Enterotoxin production analysis. Overall, there was a complete agreement between enterotoxin gene detection and enterotoxin production for 289 (99.0%) of the 292 S. intermedius isolates. Except for three S. intermedius isolates, the amplification of sec-specific sequences was confirmed for 30 (90.9%) isolates on a protein level by semiquantitative detection of corresponding toxin production using two different immunological tests (Tables 2 and 3). Two of three isolates with noncorresponding results (equine isolate K822 and canine isolate E865) were negative in both EIA and RPLA, whereas the third isolate (canine isolate E826) showed a weak SEC production value near the cutoff in the EIA but was negative in RPLA (Table 3).
One of the canine S. intermedius isolates (K861) showed, in addition to sec gene amplification and SEC production, a positive expression of SEA in EIA (ratio of optical density at 450 nm to that at 630 nm [OD450/630], 1.135) as well as positive agglutination in SEA-RPLA, but the isolate was found to be negative by sea PCR amplification and respective DNA-EIA hybridization (OD450/630, 0.013). All other S. intermedius isolates tested negative for SEA. None of the S. intermedius isolates showed production of SEB, SED, or SEE. All clinical CNS isolates tested as well as the S. epidermidis reference strain, which was included as a control, were negative by both EIA and RPLA for all enterotoxins tested.| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Whereas for S. aureus the possession of
enterotoxins is known to be a cause of food poisoning and septic
shock-like illness (7, 19, 47), only scant and
contradictory information is available concerning the production of
enterotoxins by S. intermedius and other
non-S. aureus staphylococci and their pathogenic
role. Since some studies showed evidence for the production of
exotoxins such as
-toxin and enterotoxins A and C by S. intermedius (4, 24, 31), an enterotoxigenic
potential of this species may be assumed. Furthermore, a unique
molecular variant of type C SEs was described elsewhere as
SECcanine for pyoderma isolates (32). Also, Hirooka et al. described enterotoxigenic
canine S. intermedius isolates (37).
In addition, an outbreak of food poisoning with a butter blend due to
S. intermedius has been reported previously
(41). However, valid molecular epidemiology data concerning S. intermedius enterotoxin genes
are still lacking. Thus, the aim of the study reported here was to
investigate systematically the enterotoxigenic potential of
S. intermedius by using a multiplex PCR-DNA-EIA compared with the results of two different immunoassays.
In this study, S. intermedius was isolated from more than 50% of canine cutaneous specimens (41.9% of all specimens) tested. This is in agreement with previous findings of carrier rates of 40 to nearly 100% for specimens of different cutaneous and mucocutaneous origin of healthy and diseased dogs (2, 3, 11, 27). The isolation of S. intermedius in other animal hosts compared to dogs was significantly lower (3.2%), which is in agreement with the results of previous observations (29, 35, 48).
Positive PCR amplification and DNA-EIA hybridization results were detected in 31 (12.6%) of 247 canine S. intermedius isolates, all possessing sec gene sequences, whereas no sequences of other enterotoxin genes studied were found. Regarding S. intermedius isolates of other animals tested, only one sec-positive isolate was identified from an equine specimen. Canine isolates tend to have a higher prevalence of the sec gene but not to a statistically significant extent. Thus, in contrast to equine, feline, and other animal hosts, a substantial portion of the canine population tested harbors enterotoxigenic S. intermedius. The quite frequent detection of the sec gene in S. intermedius isolates studied here (overall, 11.3%) was comparable with the SEC prevalence in S. aureus of about 5 to 15% (1, 44, 50).
Because the sec primers and the sec-specific probe of the multiplex PCR-EIA anneal in homologous regions of the different S. aureus sec gene variants (sec1, sec2, and sec3) as well as of the S. intermedius seccanine gene (except for the 1-bp difference in SEC-5B probe), the assay used here covered the sec gene variants of both species. Concerning slight differences in the nucleotide sequences of the sec subtypes, sequencing was performed to subtype the amplified sec gene fragments. All sec amplicons sequenced were represented by seccanine type (32). This applied not only to the sec-positive canine isolates but also to the equine and human isolates.
A comparison of the molecular detection of the enterotoxin genes was performed between the results obtained from two immunological assays for analysis of enterotoxin production in vitro. Overall, there was a complete agreement for 289 (99.0%) of the 292 S. intermedius isolates regarding all enterotoxins tested. Concordant positive results for SEC production and the respective toxin gene amplification-hybridization were obtained from 30 (90.9%) of 33 sec-positive isolates, thus resulting in three sec gene-possessing S. intermedius isolates without, or with only weak, enterotoxin production in vitro. Regarding S. aureus, it is known that a number of enterotoxigenic strains with positive reactions in biological assays (monkey-feeding assay) tested negative in immunological assays as described previously for the optimum sensitivity plate, a modified Ouchterlony method (13, 28, 58). With the advent of the EIA methods, it was shown that several of these strains produced only very small amounts of enterotoxin (10 to 15 ng) (58). Thus, negative or very weak results of immunoassays might be due to expression that is nonexistent or too weak to be detected even by the more sensitive modern immunological assays, or they could be explained by variations in antigenic composition of the toxin protein.
Because to date the amount of enterotoxin required to cause illness in humans is not known (12, 13), the molecular-based detection of staphylococci that produce only minimal enterotoxin is of particular importance. In principle, differences between toxin gene expression in food products or artificial culture and that in the natural habitat have to be considered (40). In addition, enterotoxin production in food is influenced by many factors that do not influence DNA-based methods (34).
The positive result for SEA production but negative result by sea-specific PCR in one S. intermedius isolate might be due to nonspecific results, since immunological methods can be influenced by various factors (14, 38, 53). In addition, cross-reactions with newly described SEs (15, 39, 51, 55, 66) or still-unknown enterotoxins sharing a close antigenic relatedness could cause positive results in immunological assays but remain unrecognized in molecular tests. Recently, Jarraud et al. (39) reported on an enterotoxin gene nursery (egc) of S. aureus which was probably generated from an ancestral gene through gene duplication and variation, suggesting further, still-unknown enterotoxins in addition to previously identified members of the expanded PT family.
In general, the numbers and types of microorganisms present in a finished food product are influenced strongly by, among other things, infected or colonized persons practicing poor personal hygiene (40). Although S. intermedius is adapted primarily to carnivore hosts, its entry into human foods is not precluded. Both invasive and noninvasive zoonotic transmissions from dogs to humans have been documented elsewhere (43, 59-61). As supported by the seccanine-positive human S. intermedius isolate reported here, enterotoxigenic S. intermedius strains may contaminate food products during handling and processing via animal-human contacts. Once enterotoxigenic S. intermedius strains are in foods, their growth may be expected to lead to the production of enterotoxins. Thus, such strains may play a role as a causative agent of SFP, as had already been demonstrated by a food-related outbreak in the western United States (41). Given the completely negative results of enterotoxin testing of the CNS control group, the occurrence of SEs in animal CNS isolates may be at least very rare.
In summary, this is the first study in which a large number of S. intermedius isolates was tested systematically for staphylococcal toxin genes. It has been demonstrated on both molecular and immunological levels that the coagulase-positive species S. intermedius possesses a substantial enterotoxigenic potential, particularly for SEC. Hence, in addition to the role of S. aureus in the etiology of SFP, we may assume a causative role particularly for canine S. intermedius isolates via canine-human contact. Therefore, S. intermedius should not be disregarded when screening food products for contamination with enterotoxin-producing pathogens or studying outbreaks of SFP. Furthermore, the application of a PCR-based method offers an alternative method for the rapid and specific detection of enterotoxigenic S. intermedius isolates, even for isolates with no or only very weak production of enterotoxins in vitro.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to M. Schulte and B. Schuhen for excellent technical assistance and M. Herrmann for critical reading of the manuscript. We thank W. Witte (Robert Koch-Institut, Wernigerode, Germany) for providing toxin-producing S. aureus reference strains.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: University of Münster, Institute of Medical Microbiology, D-48149 Münster, Germany. Phone: (49) 251 83-55360. Fax: (49) 251 83-55350. E-mail: kbecker{at}uni-muenster.de.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | al Bustan, M. A., E. E. Udo, and T. D. Chugh. 1996. Nasal carriage of enterotoxin-producing Staphylococcus aureus among restaurant workers in Kuwait City. Epidemiol. Infect. 116:319-322[Medline]. |
| 2. | Allaker, R. P., D. H. Lloyd, and R. M. Bailey. 1992. Population sizes and frequency of staphylococci at mucocutaneous sites on healthy dogs. Vet. Rec. 130:303-304[Medline]. |
| 3. | Allaker, R. P., D. H. Lloyd, and A. I. Simpson. 1992. Occurrence of Staphylococcus intermedius on the hair and skin of normal dogs. Res. Vet. Sci. 52:174-176[Medline]. |
| 4. | Almazan, J., R. de la Fuente, E. Gomez Lucía, and G. Suárez. 1987. Enterotoxin production by strains of Staphylococcus intermedius and Staphylococcus aureus isolated from dog infections. Zentbl. Bakteriol. Mikrobiol. Hyg. A 264:29-32. |
| 5. | Altekruse, S. F., M. L. Cohen, and D. L. Swerdlow. 1997. Emerging foodborne diseases. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 3:285-293[Medline]. |
| 6. |
Archer, D. L., and F. E. Young.
1988.
Contemporary issues: diseases with a food vector.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
1:377-398 |
| 7. | Balaban, N., and A. Rasooly. 2000. Staphylococcal enterotoxins. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 61:1-10[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | Barg, N. L., and T. Harris. 1997. Toxin-mediated syndromes, p. 527-543. In K. B. Crossley, and G. L. Archer (ed.), The staphylococci in human disease. Churchill Livingstone, New York, N.Y. |
| 9. |
Becker, K.,
R. Roth, and G. Peters.
1998.
Rapid and specific detection of toxigenic Staphylococcus aureus: use of two multiplex PCR enzyme immunoassays for amplification and hybridization of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes, exfoliative toxin genes, and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 gene.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:2548-2553 |
| 10. | Bennett, R. W. 1996. Atypical toxigenic Staphylococcus and non-Staphylococcus aureus species on the horizon? An update. J. Food Prot. 59:1123-1126. |
| 11. | Berg, J. N., D. E. Wendell, C. Vogelweid, and W. H. Fales. 1984. Identification of the major coagulase-positive Staphylococcus sp. of dogs as Staphylococcus intermedius. Am. J. Vet. Res. 45:1307-1309. |
| 12. | Bergdoll, M. S. 1983. Enterotoxins, p. 559-598. In C. Adlam, and C. S. F. Easmon (ed.), Staphylococci and staphylococcal infections. Academic Press, Ltd., London, United Kingdom. |
| 13. | Bergdoll, M. S. 1995. Importance of staphylococci that produce nanogram quantities of enterotoxin. Zentbl. Bakteriol. 282:1-6. |
| 14. | Berry, P. R., A. A. Wieneke, J. C. Rodhouse, and R. J. Gilbert. 1987. Use of commercial kits for the detection of Clostridium perfringens and Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins, p. 245-254. In J. M. Grange, A. Fox, and N. L. Morgan (ed.), Immunological techniques in microbiology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, United Kingdom. |
| 15. | Betley, M. J., D. W. Borst, and L. B. Regassa. 1992. Staphylococcal enterotoxins, toxic shock syndrome toxin and streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxins: a comparative study of their molecular biology. Chem. Immunol. 55:1-35[Medline]. |
| 16. |
Biberstein, E. L.,
S. S. Jang, and D. C. Hirsh.
1984.
Species distribution of coagulase-positive staphylococci in animals.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
19:610-615 |
| 17. | Bohach, G. A. 1997. Staphylococcal enterotoxins B and C. Structural requirements for superantigenic and enterotoxigenic activities. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 27:79-110[Medline]. |
| 18. | Bohach, G. A., D. J. Fast, R. D. Nelson, and P. M. Schlievert. 1990. Staphylococcal and streptococcal pyrogenic toxins involved in toxic shock syndrome and related illnesses. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 17:251-272[Medline]. |
| 19. | Bohach, G. A., and T. J. Foster. 2000. Staphylococcus aureus exotoxins, p. 367-378. In V. A. Fischetti, R. P. Novick, J. J. Ferretti, D. A. Portnoy, and J. I. Rood (ed.), Gram-positive pathogens. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. |
| 20. | Bohach, G. A., and P. M. Schlievert. 1987. Nucleotide sequence of the staphylococcal enterotoxin C1 gene and relatedness to other pyrogenic toxins. Mol. Gen. Genet. 209:15-20[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. |
Bohach, G. A., and P. M. Schlievert.
1989.
Conservation of the biologically active portions of staphylococcal enterotoxins C1 and C2.
Infect. Immun.
57:2249-2252 |
| 22. |
Brakstad, O. G.,
K. Aasbakk, and J. A. Maeland.
1992.
Detection of Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the nuc gene.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:1654-1660 |
| 23. | Breckinridge, J. C., and M. S. Bergdoll. 1971. Outbreak of food-borne gastroenteritis due to a coagulase-negative staphylococcus. N. Engl. J. Med. 284:541-543. |
| 24. | Burkett, G., and L. A. Frank. 1998. Comparison of production of Staphylococcus intermedius exotoxin among clinically normal dogs, atopic dogs with recurrent pyoderma, and dogs with a single episode of pyoderma. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 213:232-234[Medline]. |
| 25. | Chou, C. C., and L. F. Chen. 1997. Enterotoxin production by Staphylococcus warneri CCRC 12929, a coagulase-negative strain. J. Food Prot. 60:923-927. |
| 26. |
Couch, J. L., and M. J. Betley.
1989.
Nucleotide sequence of the type C3 staphylococcal enterotoxin gene suggests that intergenic recombination causes antigenic variation.
J. Bacteriol.
171:4507-4510 |
| 27. | Cox, H. U., J. D. Hoskins, S. S. Newman, C. S. Foil, G. H. Turnwald, and A. F. Roy. 1988. Temporal study of staphylococcal species on healthy dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 49:747-751[Medline]. |
| 28. | Crowle, A. J. 1961. Immunodiffusion. Academic Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 29. | Devriese, L. A., D. Nzuambe, and C. Godard. 1985. Identification and characteristics of staphylococci isolated from lesions and normal skin of horses. Vet. Microbiol. 10:269-277[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 30. |
Dinges, M. M.,
P. M. Orwin, and P. M. Schlievert.
2000.
Exotoxins of Staphylococcus aureus.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
13:16-34 |
| 31. | Dziewanowska, K., V. M. Edwards, J. R. Deringer, G. A. Bohach, and D. J. Guerra. 1996. Comparison of the beta-toxins from Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus intermedius. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 335:102-108[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 32. | Edwards, V. M., J. R. Deringer, S. D. Callantine, C. F. Deobald, P. H. Berger, V. Kapur, C. V. Stauffacher, and G. A. Bohach. 1997. Characterization of the canine type C enterotoxin produced by Staphylococcus intermedius pyoderma isolates. Infect. Immun. 65:2346-2352[Abstract]. |
| 33. |
Goh, S. H.,
S. K. Byrne,
J. L. Zhang, and A. W. Chow.
1992.
Molecular typing of Staphylococcus aureus on the basis of coagulase gene polymorphisms.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:1642-1645 |
| 34. |
Gomez Lucía, E.,
J. Goyache,
J. A. Orden,
J. L. Blanco,
J. A. Ruiz Santa Quiteria,
L. Domínguez, and G. Suárez.
1989.
Production of enterotoxin A by supposedly nonenterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus strains.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
55:1447-1451 |
| 35. | Greene, R. T., and C. Lämmler. 1993. Staphylococcus intermedius: current knowledge on a pathogen of veterinary importance. Zentbl. Veterinärmed. B 40:206-214. |
| 36. |
Hajek, V.
1976.
Staphylococcus intermedius, a new species isolated from animals.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
26:401-408 |
| 37. | Hirooka, E. Y., E. E. Muller, J. C. Freitas, E. Vicente, Y. Yoshimoto, and M. S. Bergdoll. 1988. Enterotoxigenicity of Staphylococcus intermedius of canine origin. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 7:185-191[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 38. | Inganäs, M., S. G. Johansson, and H. H. Bennich. 1980. Interaction of human polyclonal IgE and IgG from different species with protein A from Staphylococcus aureus: demonstration of protein-A-reactive sites located in the Fab2 fragment of human IgG. Scand. J. Immunol. 12:23-31[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 39. |
Jarraud, S.,
M. A. Peyrat,
A. Lim,
A. Tristan,
M. Bes,
C. Mougel,
J. Etienne,
F. Vandenesch,
M. Bonneville, and G. Lina.
2001.
egc, a highly prevalent operon of enterotoxin gene, forms a putative nursery of superantigens in Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Immunol.
166:669-677 |
| 40. | Jay, J. M. 1996. Modern food microbiology, p. 429-450. Chapman & Hall, New York, N.Y. |
| 41. | Khambaty, F. M., R. W. Bennett, and D. B. Shah. 1994. Application of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to the epidemiological characterization of Staphylococcus intermedius implicated in a food-related outbreak. Epidemiol. Infect. 113:75-81[Medline]. |
| 42. | Kotb, M. 1995. Bacterial pyrogenic exotoxins as superantigens. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 8:411-426[Abstract]. |
| 43. | Lee, J. 1994. Staphylococcus intermedius isolated from dog-bite wounds. J. Infect. 29:105[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 44. | Lehn, N., E. Schaller, H. Wagner, and M. Krönke. 1995. Frequency of toxic shock syndrome toxin- and enterotoxin-producing clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 14:43-46[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 45. | Llorca, I., S. Gago, J. Sanmartin, and R. Sanchez. 1992. Endocarditis infecciosa por Staphylococcus intermedius en paciente infectado por VIH. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 10:317-318[Medline]. |
| 46. |
Marin, M. E.,
M. C. de la Rosa, and I. Cornejo.
1992.
Enterotoxigenicity of Staphylococcus strains isolated from Spanish dry-cured hams.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
58:1067-1069 |
| 47. |
Marrack, P., and J. Kappler.
1990.
The staphylococcal enterotoxins and their relatives.
Science
248:705-711 |
| 48. | Medleau, L., and J. L. Blue. 1988. Frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus spp isolated from feline skin lesions. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 193:1080-1081[Medline]. |
| 49. |
Mendoza, M.,
H. Meugnier,
M. Bes,
J. Etienne, and J. Freney.
1998.
Identification of Staphylococcus species by 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer PCR analysis.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
48:1049-1055 |
| 50. |
Miyake, Y.,
T. Iwai,
M. Sugai,
K. Miura,
H. Suginaka, and N. Nagasaka.
1991.
Incidence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus from the tongues of children.
J. Dent. Res.
70:1045-1047 |
| 51. |
Munson, S. H.,
M. T. Tremaine,
M. J. Betley, and R. A. Welch.
1998.
Identification and characterization of staphylococcal enterotoxin types G and I from Staphylococcus aureus.
Infect. Immun.
66:3337-3348 |
| 52. | Orden, J. A., D. Cid, M. E. Blanco, J. A. Ruiz Santa Quiteria, E. Gomez Lucía, and R. de la Fuente. 1992. Enterotoxin and toxic shock syndrome toxin-one production by staphylococci isolated from mastitis in sheep. APMIS 100:132-134[Medline]. |
| 53. |
Park, C. E.,
M. Akhtar, and M. K. Rayman.
1992.
Nonspecific reactions of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (TECRA) for detection of staphylococcal enterotoxins in foods.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
58:2509-2512 |
| 54. |
Raus, J., and D. N. Love.
1983.
Characterization of coagulase-positive Staphylococcus intermedius and Staphylococcus aureus isolated from veterinary clinical specimens.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
18:789-792 |
| 55. |
Ren, K.,
J. D. Bannan,
V. Pancholi,
A. L. Cheung,
J. C. Robbins,
V. A. Fischetti, and J. B. Zabriskie.
1994.
Characterization and biological properties of a new staphylococcal exotoxin.
J. Exp. Med.
180:1675-1683 |
| 56. |
Rifai, S.,
V. Barbancon,
G. Prevost, and Y. Piemont.
1989.
Synthetic exfoliative toxin A and B DNA probes for detection of toxigenic Staphylococcus aureus strains.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
27:504-506 |
| 57. | Rosec, J. P., J. P. Guiraud, C. Dalet, and N. Richard. 1997. Enterotoxin production by staphylococci isolated from foods in France. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 35:213-221[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 58. | Surgalla, M. J., M. S. Bergdoll, and G. M. Dack. 1953. Some observations on the assay of staphylococcal enterotoxin by the monkey-feeding test. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 41:782-788. |
| 59. |
Talan, D. A.,
D. Staatz,
A. Staatz,
E. J. Goldstein,
K. Singer, and G. D. Overturf.
1989.
Staphylococcus intermedius in canine gingiva and canine-inflicted human wound infections: laboratory characterization of a newly recognized zoonotic pathogen.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
27:78-81 |
| 60. |
Talan, D. A.,
D. Staatz,
A. Staatz, and G. D. Overturf.
1989.
Frequency of Staphylococcus intermedius as human nasopharyngeal flora.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
27:2393 |
| 61. |
Tanner, M. A.,
C. L. Everett, and D. C. Youvan.
2000.
Molecular phylogenetic evidence for noninvasive zoonotic transmission of Staphylococcus intermedius from a canine pet to a human.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:1628-1631 |
| 62. | Todd, E. C. 1989. Costs of acute bacterial foodborne disease in Canada and the United States. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 9:313-326[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 63. |
Valle, J.,
E. Gomez-Lucia,
S. Piriz,
J. Goyache,
J. A. Orden, and S. Vadillo.
1990.
Enterotoxin production by staphylococci isolated from healthy goats.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
56:1323-1326 |
| 64. | Vandenesch, F., M. Célard, D. Arpin, M. Bes, T. Greenland, and J. Etienne. 1995. Catheter-related bacteremia associated with coagulase-positive Staphylococcus intermedius. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2508-2510[Abstract]. |
| 65. | Vernozy Rozand, C., C. Mazuy, G. Prevost, C. Lapeyre, M. Bes, Y. Brun, and J. Fleurette. 1996. Enterotoxin production by coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from goats' milk and cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 30:271-280[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 66. | Zhang, S., J. J. Iandolo, and G. C. Stewart. 1998. The enterotoxin D plasmid of Staphylococcus aureus encodes a second enterotoxin determinant (sej). FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 168:227-233[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Eukaryot. Cell | All ASM Journals |
|---|