Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2001, p. 495-498, Vol. 67, No. 2
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.2.495-498.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Management of Indigenous Plant-Microbe Symbioses
Aids Restoration of Desertified Ecosystems
Natalia
Requena,1,2
Estefania
Perez-Solis,1
Concepción
Azcón-Aguilar,1
Peter
Jeffries,3 and
José-Miguel
Barea1,*
Departamento de Microbiología del
Suelo y Sistemas Simbióticos, Estación Experimental del
Zaidín, CSIC, 18008 Granada, Spain1;
Max-Planck-Institut für terrestrische Mikrobiologie,
35043 Marburg, Germany2; and
Research School of Biosciences, University of Kent Canterbury,
Kent CT2 7NJ, United Kingdom3
Received 3 July 2000/Accepted 13 November 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Disturbance of natural plant communities is the first visible
indication of a desertification process, but damage to physical, chemical, and biological soil properties is known to occur
simultaneously. Such soil degradation limits reestablishment of the
natural plant cover. In particular, desertification causes disturbance
of plant-microbe symbioses which are a critical ecological factor in
helping further plant growth in degraded ecosystems. Here we
demonstrate, in two long-term experiments in a desertified
Mediterranean ecosystem, that inoculation with indigenous arbuscular
mycorrhizal fungi and with rhizobial nitrogen-fixing bacteria not only
enhanced the establishment of key plant species but also increased soil fertility and quality. The dual symbiosis increased the soil nitrogen (N) content, organic matter, and hydrostable soil aggregates and enhanced N transfer from N-fixing to nonfixing species associated within the natural succession. We conclude that the introduction of
target indigenous species of plants associated with a managed community
of microbial symbionts is a successful biotechnological tool to aid the
recovery of desertified ecosystems.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Desertification of terrestrial
ecosystems is claiming several million hectares annually
(29). It results from anthropogenic impacts which
exacerbate the activity of natural agents. Disturbance of natural plant
communities is the first visible symptom but is often accompanied or
preceded by loss of key physicochemical and biological soil properties
(soil structure, plant nutrient availability, organic matter content,
and/or microbial activity (24). These properties largely
determine soil quality and fertility, and thus plant establishment and
productivity. Hence their degradation results in a loss of
sustainability. Since soil degradation limits the potential for
reestablishment of native plants (1, 29), erosion and
desertification are accelerated. Desertification has a negative
environmental impact, particularly in arid, semiarid, and subhumid
areas of the world (13). In particular, desertification reduces the inoculum potential of mutualistic microbial symbionts that
are key ecological factors in governing the cycles of major plant
nutrients and hence in sustaining the vegetation cover in natural
habitats. The most important symbionts are (i) mycorrhizal fungi, which
enhance the ability of plants to establish and cope in stress
situations (nutrient deficiency, drought, soil disturbance, etc.)
(8, 23), and (ii) N-fixing rhizobia, which enable
leguminous plants to flourish in the absence of adequate fixed N
sources. A reduction in the potential to form these symbioses therefore hinders revegetation success (2, 14, 22). Mediterranean regions are characterized by a set of climatic conditions which include
a long dry and hot summer, with scarce, erratic, but torrential rainfalls. This climate, together with anthropogenic degradative activities (overgrazing, nonregulated cultivation techniques, deforestation, etc.), is a major threat to the sustainability of
Mediterranean ecosystems (16, 27). Susceptibility to
desertification in Mediterranean regions is increasing worldwide
(29). Desertified and desertification-threatened areas are
common in the Mediterranean regions of Europe, particularly in
southeastern Spain, and there are many representative areas where
reclamation or rehabilitation programs are being attempted to restore
sustainable ecosystems (12, 13, 18). Shrub communities,
associated with other small woody plants, are characteristic of these
semiarid ecosystems, with nitrogen-fixing legumes being key components
of the natural succession (5, 12, 13, 18). These species
are extremely important because their associated rhizobial symbioses
constitute a source of N input to the ecosystem (7). Thus,
reestablishing a shrubland is a key step in revegetation strategies.
All the woody legumes involved also form a symbiosis with arbuscular
mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) (13). The fungal mycelium which
extends from the mycorrhizal roots forms a three-dimensional network
which links the roots and the soil environment. It constitutes an
efficient system for nutrient uptake (particularly P) and scavenging in nutrient-poor conditions. The mycelium also contributes to the formation of water-stable aggregates necessary for good soil tilth (15). In the tripartite rhizobial-AMF-legume symbiosis,
there is synergism between the partners in that the scarcity of
available P in desertified ecosystems limits legume establishment and
N2 fixation (7) in the absence of AM
formation. Loss of microsymbiont propagules from degraded Mediterranean
ecosystems can preclude either natural or artificial processes of
revegetation; therefore, augmentation of the inoculum may be needed
(20). In revegetation schemes, inoculation of plants with
microsymbionts should not only help plant establishment
(13) but also improve the physical, chemical, and
biological soil properties contributing to soil quality
(10). This premise has to be tested experimentally.
The main objective of this investigation was to assess the
long-term benefits of inoculation with a combination of AMF and rhizobial strains on the establishment of key plant species in a
representative desertified Mediterranean ecosystem. The experimental variables to be tested in transplanted seedlings included survival rates, N fixation, N transfer from N-fixing to nonfixing species associated in the natural succession, and improvements in soil quality
in terms of N content, levels of organic matter (OM), and hydrostable
soil aggregates. In addition, we determined whether these changes were
accompanied by an increase in the inoculum potential of AMF, suggesting
that this represented the initial steps in the restoration of a
self-sustaining ecosystem.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
The ecosystem.
A representative area within a desertified
semiarid ecosystem in the Sierra de los Filabres, Almeria, southeastern
Spain, was chosen for field studies. The existing natural vegetation was a degraded shrubland where Anthyllis cytisoides, a
drought-tolerant legume able to form symbioses with both rhizobial and
AM microsymbionts, was the dominant species (20). Small
numbers of indigenous AMF spores (Scutellospora calospora,
Glomus coronatum, G. constrictum, Acaulospora spp., and an undescribed hyaline species typical
of semiarid soils [11]) were present in the soil, but
the indigenous inoculum potential of AMF was inadequate to support an
extensive revegetation program (20). Two experiments were
carried out.
Experiment 1.
Seeds of A. cytisoides were
collected at random from wild plants growing in the experimental area
and germinated (20). After 3 days, seedlings were
transferred to 325-ml plastic containers (Troncoconic), as used in
commercial forestry practice, filled with 300 g of autoclaved soil
from the field site. Plants (40 per treatment) were grown under nursery
conditions at ambient temperatures from 19 to 25°C, with watering
every 2 days. All seedlings were inoculated with a previously selected
rhizobial culture, Rhizobium sp. strain NR4 (from the
collection of this institute [21]), and received one of
three mycorrhizal treatments: (i) inoculation with an exotic AMF,
Glomus intraradices, from the Consejo Superior de
Investigaciones Científicas collection; (ii) inoculation with a
mixture of indigenous AMF; or (iii) a control treatment of sterile
inoculum. Inoculation was performed such that each seedling received
20 g of inoculum (21) consisting of a mixture of
spores, hyphae, and mycorrhizal onion root fragments from trap cultures
containing either G. intraradices or all five AMF taxa and
representing the natural abundance and diversity in the site. The
control was an autoclaved mixture of these AMF inocula.
After 6 months, in November 1994, the plants were transplanted to the
chosen desertified ecosystem (20). The plants were planted
1 m apart in a randomized design in a bare area at a density similar to the natural abundance in well-covered areas in the adjacent
ecosystem. The plants were left to develop under field conditions
without any further management. After 12, 36, and 60 months, the plants
were assessed for percentage survival. Fifteen representative plants
per treatment were selected for monitoring of the key experimental
variables in the adjacent rhizosphere soil, such as soil aggregation
(9), nitrogen and organic matter content (9),
number of AMF infective propagules (10), and height and
diameter of the plant canopies. In each case, rhizosphere soil was
collected by using a corer. Climatological characteristics are
described elsewhere (19), but the key features were as
follows: average annual rainfall, 218 mm; temperature range, 4 to
30°C; average yearly temperature, 18°C.
Experiment 2.
Two-month-old seedlings of both A. cytisoides and Lavandula multifida plants were
transplanted into an adjacent experimental area to that used for
experiment 1. The plants were produced as above, except that only two
treatments were compared (plus or minus the inoculum of indigenous
AMF). The Anthyllis seedlings were inoculated with a
rhizobial culture as before. A completely randomized block design was
used for planting, consisting of two factors: planting combinations and
AMF inoculation treatments. The planting combinations included (i)
Anthyllis growing alone, (ii) Lavandula growing
alone, and (iii) the plants growing as a mixture of the two species. In
all cases, the plants were planted 20 cm apart to facilitate
rhizosphere interactions. The other factor, the AMF treatment consisted
of (i) plants inoculated with the mixture of indigenous AMF as prepared
for experiment 1 and (ii) the noninoculated control (also prepared as
in experiment 1). There were 20 plants per species/planting combination
and AMF treatment. All plants received a single dressing at
transplanting of the isotope 15N as
(NH4)2SO4 with 10% 15N
atom excess, at a rate equivalent to 5 kg of N ha
1 to
measure N fixation and N transfer from the N-fixing to the non-N-fixing
plants (7). After 10 months of growth under natural conditions in the field, the plants were harvested and shoot biomass was determined after drying for 48 h at 60°C. Isotopic N
composition was determined (7), and the roots were
evaluated for percent colonization by AMF (21).
 |
RESULTS |
Experiment 1.
The results of a 5-year trial showed significant
improvements in the performance of Anthyllis plants
inoculated with native AMF and rhizobial ecosymbionts (Fig.
1). Survival rates were higher in
AMF-inoculated than in uninoculated plants (80 and 65%, respectively), but at least 25 plants in any treatment, out of the 40 transplanted, survived the dry and adverse conditions during the first year after
outplanting, with no more losses afterward. In year 1, the plants
inoculated with the exotic AMF G. intraradices were larger than those that underwent the other two treatments, but by year 3 the
plants inoculated with the mixed indigenous AMF were the largest.
By year 5, the plants inoculated with G. intraradices were
not significantly larger than the plants not inoculated with AMF
whereas the plants inoculated with the mixed inoculum were almost twice
as large as those that underwent the other two treatments.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Time course changes in plant growth of field-established
nodulated A. cytisoides growing under natural conditions,
either uninoculated ( ) or inoculated with G. intraradices
( ) or with native AMF ( ). For each experimental variable, mean
values not sharing a letter differ significantly at P < 0.05 by Duncan's multiple-range test.
|
|
Inoculation with the microbial ecosymbionts resulted in an increase in
the number of AMF propagules able to develop colonization
units on
plant roots in the soil around the
Anthyllis plants (Fig.
2). Diversity analysis of AMF propagules
in the rhizosphere of
Anthyllis plants showed that all five
key taxa were present in
the rhizosphere of all plants in year 5 while
spores of the introduced
exotic AMF were scarce.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Time course changes in soil traits related to soil
quality in the rhizosphere of field-established nodulated plants of
A. cytisoides growing under natural conditions, either
uninoculated ( ) or inoculated with G. intraradices ( )
or with native AMF ( ). For each experimental variable, mean values
not sharing a letter differ significantly at P < 0.05
by Duncan's multiple range test. Data points on the y
axis represent background values in the bare soil before
transplanting.
|
|
There were also significant improvements in years 3 and 5 in the
physicochemical properties in the soil around the
Anthyllis plants inoculated with the mixed AMF inoculum, including N content,
amount of OM, and aggregation (Fig.
2).
Experiment 2.
The 1-year field trial used 15N
isotope dilution techniques to study N fixation in Anthyllis
and N transfer from this plant to Lavandula, a nonleguminous
woody species commonly associated with Anthyllis in the
natural plant succession in the target area (5). The
results (Fig. 3) showed that (i)
Lavandula plants benefited from growing with the N-fixing
legume, with regard to both biomass accumulation and N acquisition;
(ii) inoculation with native AMF benefited plant growth, N fixation,
and N transfer in both plants, even though indigenous fungi had
colonized the roots of noninoculated plants to high levels after 10 months in the field; and (iii) inoculation of Anthyllis with
AMF also enhanced the mycorrhizal level of uninoculated
Lavandula plants growing nearby.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Above-ground biomass production, amount of N in the
legume derived from biological fixation (%NdfFix), amount of N in the
nonlegume derived from transfer of the N fixed by the legume
(%NdfTransf), and mycorrhizal colonization in plants of A. cytisoides and L. multifida growing for 10 months under
natural conditions, either uninoculated ( ) or inoculated with native
AMF ( ). For each experimental variable, mean values not sharing a
letter differ significantly at P < 0.05 by Duncan's
multiple-range test.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In relation to applied environmental microbiology, the following
three main points deserve discussion: (i) whether the microsymbionts, particularly native versus exotic AMF, were effective in improving outplanting performance and survival of native legumes; (ii) whether a
long-term effect of AMF inoculation on physicochemical soil properties
was evident; and (iii) whether AMF inoculants affect N fixation by the
target legume and the subsequent N transfer to improve N nutrition for
non-N-fixing vegetation.
The effectiveness of microsymbionts in improving the outplanting
performance of native shrub legumes was evident. Results from
experiment 1 showed that bioaugmentation of the soil with an inoculum
of a mixed, native AMF inoculum increased plant productivity. This
correlates with other studies which show that native AMF are important
contributors to plant biodiversity and ecosystem productivity (3,
28). It is noteworthy that all five key taxa of AMF propagules
were present in the rhizosphere of all plants in year 5, while spores
of the introduced exotic AMF were scarce. Thus, the inoculum had
established sustainable relationships with the transplants and would
maintain the inoculum potential of the ecosystem. These results
demonstrate that this biotechnology (microsymbiont inoculation) can be
used in revegetation strategies for desertified lands.
A long-term improvement in the physicochemical properties was
evident in the soil around the Anthyllis plants inoculated
with the mixed AMF inoculum, including increased N content and higher levels of OM and soil aggregation. An increase in the levels of both OM
and N in soil stimulates plant development (12, 18, 27).
The OM content increases mainly through leaf and branch fall, but it
has also been related to the extent of AM colonization of the root
(10). It can be assumed that the increase in N content in
the rhizosphere of the legume can be accounted for by an improvement in
nodulation and N fixation capacity resulting from inoculation with AMF
(7). The improvement of soil aggregation contributes to
the maintenance of good water infiltration rates, good tilth, and
adequate aeration for plant growth, thus improving soil quality (30). The important role of the soil mycelium of AMF in
the formation of water-stable soil aggregates is well documented
(4, 9, 17, 26), and the involvement of glomalin, a
glycoprotein produced by the external hyphae of AMF, has been
demonstrated (30). Glomalin has been suggested to
contribute to the hydrophobicity of soil particles and also,
because its glue-like hydrophobic nature, to participate in the
initiation of soil aggregates (30).
It is clear from the results of the experiment 2 that inoculation
with native AMF benefited plant growth, N fixation, and N transfer. An
improved N status of nonleguminous plants grown in association with
legumes has previously been described for agricultural crops (6,
15), but this is the first demonstration of this phenomenon for
natural plant communities in a semiarid ecosystem. The results
emphasize the important role of shrub legumes as a source of AMF
inoculum for the surrounding area and in improving N nutrition for
non-N-fixing vegetation. They support the general conclusion that the
introduction of target indigenous species of plants associated with a
managed community of microbial symbionts is a successful
biotechnological tool to aid the recovery of desertified ecosystems.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by the CICYT, OECD, Wain Fund, and EU
REDEEM, REDMED and MYRISME Projects.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Departamento de
Microbiología del Suelo y Sistemas Simbióticos,
Estación Experimental del Zaidín, CSIC, Profesor Albareda
1, 18008 Granada, Spain. Phone: 34 958 121011. Fax: 34 958 129600. E-mail: jmbarea{at}eez.csic.es.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Agnew, C., and A. Warren.
1996.
A framework for tackling drought and land degradation.
J. Arid Environ.
33:309-320[CrossRef].
|
| 2.
|
Allen, E. B.
1989.
The restoration of disturbed arid landscapes with special reference to mycorrhizal fungi.
J. Arid Environ.
17:279-286.
|
| 3.
|
Allen, E. B.,
M. F. Allen,
D. J. Helm,
J. M. Trappe,
R. Molina, and E. Rincon.
1995.
Patterns and regulation of mycorrhizal plant and fungal diversity.
Plant Soil
170:47-62[CrossRef].
|
| 4.
|
Andrade, G.,
K. L. Mihara,
R. G. Linderman, and G. J. Bethlenfalvay.
1998.
Soil aggregation status and rhizobacteria in the mycorrhizosphere.
Plant Soil
202:89-96[CrossRef].
|
| 5.
|
Azcón, R., and J. M. Barea.
1997.
Mycorrhizal dependency of a representative plant species in Mediterranean shrublands (Lavandula spica L.) as a key factor to its use for revegetation strategies in desertification-threatened areas.
Appl. Soil Ecol.
7:83-92.
|
| 6.
|
Azcón-Aguilar, C.,
R. Azcón, and J. M. Barea.
1979.
Endomycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium as biological fertilizers for Medicago sativa in normal cultivation.
Nature
27:235-237.
|
| 7.
|
Barea, J. M.,
R. Azcón, and C. Azcón-Aguilar.
1992.
Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in nitrogen-fixing systems.
Methods Microbiol.
24:391-416.
|
| 8.
|
Barea, J. M.,
C. Azcón-Aguilar, and R. Azcón.
1997.
Interactions between mycorrhizal fungi and rhizosphere microorganisms within the context of sustainable soli-plant systems, p. 65-77.
In
A. C. Gange, and V. K. Brown (ed.), Multitrophic interactions in terrestrial systems. Backwell Science, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
|
| 9.
|
Bethlenfalvay, G. J.,
I. C. Cantrell,
K. L. Mihara, and R. P. Schreiner.
1999.
Relationships between soil aggregation and mycorrhizae as influenced by soil biota and nitrogen nutrition.
Biol. Fertil. Soils
28:356-363[CrossRef].
|
| 10.
|
Carrillo-García, A.,
J. L. Leon de la Luz,
Y. Bashan, and G. J. Bethlenfalvay.
1999.
Nurse plants, mycorrhizae, and plant establishment in a disturbed area of the Sonoran Desert.
Restor. Ecol.
7:321-335[CrossRef].
|
| 11.
|
Dodd, J. C., and J. Krikun.
1984.
Observations on endogonaceous spores in the Negev Desert.
Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc.
82:536-540.
|
| 12.
|
Francis, C. F., and J. B. Thornes.
1990.
Matorral: erosin and reclamation, p. 87-115.
In
J. Albadalejo, M. A. Stocking, and E. Díaz (ed.), Soil degradation and rehabilitation in Mediterranean environmental conditions. CSIC, Murcia, Spain.
|
| 13.
|
Herrera, M. A.,
C. P. Salamanca, and J. M. Barea.
1993.
Inoculation of woody legumes with selected arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia to recover desertified Mediterranean ecosystems.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
59:129-133[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Jasper, D. A.,
L. K. Abbott, and A. D. Robson.
1989.
Soil disturbance reduces the infectivity of external hyphae of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.
New Phytol.
112:93-99[CrossRef].
|
| 15.
|
Jeffries, P., and J. M. Barea.
2000.
Arbuscular mycorrhiza a key component of sustainable plant-soil ecosystems, p. 95-113.
In
B. Hock (ed.), The mycota. IX. Fungal associations. Springer-Verlag KG, Berlin, Germany.
|
| 16.
|
López-Bermúdez, F., and J. Albaladejo.
1990.
Factores ambientales de la degradación del suelo en el area mediterránea, p. 15-45.
In
J. Albadalejo, M. A. Stocking, and E. Díaz (ed.), Soil degradation and rehabilitation in Mediterranean environmental conditions. CSIC, Murcia, Spain.
|
| 17.
|
Miller, R. M., and D. J. Lodge.
1997.
Fungal reponses to disturbance: agriculture and forestry, p. 65-80.
In
D. T. Wicklow, and D. T. Söderström (ed.), The mycota. IV. Environmental and microbial relationships. Springer-Verlag KG, Berlin, Germany.
|
| 18.
|
Morgan, R. P. C.,
R. J. Rickson, and W. Wright.
1990.
Regeneration of degraded soils, p. 69-85.
In
J. Albadalejo, M. A. Stocking, and E. Díaz (ed.), Soil degradation and rehabilitation in Mediterranean environmental conditions. CSIC, Murcia, Spain.
|
| 19.
|
Puigdefábregas, J.,
J. M. Alonso,
L. Delgado,
F. Domingo,
M. Cueto,
L. Gutiérrez,
R. Lázaro,
J. M. Nicolau,
G. Sánchez,
A. Solé, and S. Vidal.
1996.
The Rambla Honda field site: interactions of soil and vegetation along a catena in semi-arid Southeast Spain, p. 137-168.
In
C. J. Brandt, and J. B. Thornes (ed.), Mediterranean desertification and land use. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 20.
|
Requena, N.,
P. Jeffries, and J. M. Barea.
1996.
Assessment of natural mycorrhizal potential in a desertified semiarid ecosystem.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
62:842-847[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Requena, N.,
I. Jimenez,
M. Toro, and J. M. Barea.
1997.
Interactions between plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium spp. in the rhizosphere of Anthyllis cytisoides, a model legume for revegetation in mediterranean semi-arid ecosystems.
New Phytol.
136:667-677[CrossRef].
|
| 22.
|
Roldan, A., and J. Albaladejo.
1994.
The effect of mycorrhizal inoculation and soil restoration on the growth of Pinus halepensis in a semiarid soil.
Biol. Fertil. Soils
18:143-149.
|
| 23.
|
Schreiner, R. P.,
K. L. Milhara,
H. McDaniel, and G. J. Bethlenfalvay.
1997.
Mycorrhizal fungi influence plant and soil functions and interactions.
Plant Soil
188:199-209[CrossRef].
|
| 24.
|
Skujins, J., and M. F. Allen.
1986.
Use of mycorrhizae for land rehabilitation.
MIRCEN J.
2:161-176.
|
| 25.
|
Soil Conservation Service.
1973.
Soil Survey Laboratory methods and procedures for collecting soil samples. U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
|
| 26.
|
Tisdall, J. M.,
S. E. Smith, and P. Rengasamy.
1997.
Aggregation of soil by fungal hyphae.
Aust. J. Soil Res.
35:1[CrossRef] 55-60.
|
| 27.
|
Vallejo, V. R.,
S. Bautista, and J. R. Cortina.
1999.
Restoration for soil protection after disturbances, p. 301-343.
In
L. Trabaud (ed.), Life and environment in the Mediterranean. Wit Press, Wessex, United Kingdom.
|
| 28.
|
Van der Heijden, M. G. A.,
J. N. Klironomos,
M. Ursic,
P. Moutoglis,
R. Streitwolf-Engel,
T. Boller,
A. Wiemken, and I. R. Sanders.
1998.
Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity.
Nature
396:69-72[CrossRef].
|
| 29.
|
Warren, A.,
Y. C. Sud, and B. Rozanov.
1996.
The future of deserts.
J. Arid Environ.
32:75-89.
|
| 30.
|
Wright, S. F., and A. Upadhyaya.
1998.
A survey of soils for aggregate stability and glomalin, a glycoprotein produced by hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.
Plant Soil
198:97-107[CrossRef].
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2001, p. 495-498, Vol. 67, No. 2
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.2.495-498.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Harris, J.
(2009). Soil Microbial Communities and Restoration Ecology: Facilitators or Followers?. Science
325: 573-574
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kumar, M., Yadav, V., Tuteja, N., Johri, A. K.
(2009). Antioxidant enzyme activities in maize plants colonized with Piriformospora indica. Microbiology
155: 780-790
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Barea, J.-M., Pozo, M. J., Azcon, R., Azcon-Aguilar, C.
(2005). Microbial co-operation in the rhizosphere. J Exp Bot
56: 1761-1778
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Scheublin, T. R., Ridgway, K. P., Young, J. P. W., van der Heijden, M. G. A.
(2004). Nonlegumes, Legumes, and Root Nodules Harbor Different Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
70: 6240-6246
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Oehl, F., Sieverding, E., Ineichen, K., Mader, P., Boller, T., Wiemken, A.
(2003). Impact of Land Use Intensity on the Species Diversity of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Agroecosystems of Central Europe. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 2816-2824
[Abstract]
[Full Text]