Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2001, p. 546-552, Vol. 67, No. 2
Department of Entomology, University of
Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108
Received 17 July 2000/Accepted 3 November 2000
An embryonic cell line (DAE100) of the Rocky Mountain wood tick,
Dermacentor andersoni, was observed by microscopy to be
chronically infected with a rickettsialike organism. The organism was
identified as a spotted fever group (SFG) rickettsia by PCR
amplification and sequencing of portions of the 16S rRNA, citrate
synthase, Rickettsia genus-specific 17-kDa antigen, and
SFG-specific 190-kDa outer membrane protein A (rOmpA) genes. Sequence
analysis of a partial rompA gene PCR fragment and indirect
fluorescent antibody data for rOmpA and rOmpB indicated that this
rickettsia was a strain (DaE100R) of Rickettsia peacockii,
an SFG species presumed to be avirulent for both ticks and mammals.
R. peacockii was successfully maintained in a continuous
culture of DAE100 cells without apparent adverse effects on the host
cells. Establishing cell lines from embryonic tissues of ticks offers
an alternative technique for isolation of rickettsiae that are
transovarially transmitted.
Rickettsiae are obligately
intracellular gram-negative bacteria, some of which are pathogens of
arthropods and mammals (5). The genus
Rickettsia includes the spotted fever group (SFG)
rickettsiae that are dependent on acarines for propagation and
maintenance in nature (7). Ticks can serve as vectors for
mammalian pathogenic SFG rickettsiae, as well as maintenance hosts for
SFG rickettsiae that are transmitted transstadially and transovarially
via female germinal tissues. The latter group includes those SFG
rickettsiae which have been isolated only from ticks and which may be
beneficial for the ticks that harbor them (3, 21, 23, 34).
Stable maintenance of these rickettsiae within tick populations is
postulated to occur solely via transovarial transmission from one
generation to the next (8). Such rickettsiae may benefit
the tick by antagonizing superinfection of the host tick by closely
related species that are pathogenic for ticks (2). Many of
these rickettsiae remain poorly characterized due to our inability to
maintain them in mammalian cell culture, embryonated chicken eggs, or
small rodents, which have traditionally been the standard maintenance
hosts used in rickettsiology (5). Tick cell culture offers
an alternative approach for propagation and study of these organisms
(17).
The east side agent, recently classified and designated
Rickettsia peacockii (22), has been reported to
be noninfectious for meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus)
and Swiss mice (Mus musculus) (22). R. peacockii is beneficial for its maintenance host, the Rocky
Mountain wood tick, Dermacentor andersoni (3). The wood tick is also associated with and transmits pathogenic strains
of Rickettsia rickettsii, which causes both Rocky Mountain spotted fever in mammals and increased mortality for its vector host
(21). The presence of R. peacockii within
ovaries of D. andersoni interferes with the ability of
virulent R. rickettsii to infect the ovarian tissues and
to be transovarially transmitted to progeny (3).
Previous attempts to cultivate R. peacockii in vitro were
unsuccessful (3, 22). In addition, prior attempts to
isolate D. andersoni cell lines for the purpose of
propagating microbes associated with this tick species have been
unsuccessful as well (37).
In this report, we describe isolation, propagation, and partial
characterization of R. peacockii in a D. andersoni cell line (DAE100). This was achieved by establishing
cell lines from the embryonic tissues of laboratory-reared D. andersoni ticks chronically infected with R. peacockii.
(This research was conducted by Jason A. Simser in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for a Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota, St.
Paul.)
Establishment and maintenance of D. andersoni cell
line DAE100.
Cell line DAE100 was isolated from eggs laid by mated
and engorged D. andersoni ticks from a laboratory colony
maintained at Oklahoma State University and kindly supplied by
Katherine Kocan. The colony had been initiated with ticks collected
from north central Colorado at a location 5 miles west of Rustic, Colo. (40°41.897'N, 105°37.362'W) (W. C. Black IV, University of
Colorado, personal communication). Primary cultures of embryonic
tissues were initiated 25 to 30 days after the onset of oviposition
(18). Embryonic tissues were inoculated into
25-cm2 culture flasks (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) and
incubated at 34°C. Each flask contained 5 ml of L15B medium
supplemented with fetal bovine serum (20% for the first week and 5%
thereafter), tryptose phosphate broth (10%), and bovine lipoprotein
concentrate (1%) (18). The pH of the complete medium was
adjusted to 6.8 to 7.0 with 1 N NaOH. Antibiotics (50 µg of
gentamicin per ml, 100 U of penicillin per ml, and 100 µg of
streptomycin sulfate per ml) were used when the primary culture was
initiated. After 2 weeks, the medium was replaced weekly with
antibiotic-free complete medium. Subcultures were made when cells
reached confluency by transferring one-half to one-tenth of resuspended
cell preparations to new culture flasks containing 2.5 to 4.5 ml of
fresh media (final volume, 5 ml).
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.2.546-552.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Isolation of a Spotted Fever Group Rickettsia, Rickettsia
peacockii, in a Rocky Mountain Wood Tick, Dermacentor
andersoni, Cell Line
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
70°C, and they were used later for isozyme and
PCR analyses (see below).
Microorganisms. A rickettsia, initially referred to as DaE100R and later identified as R. peacockii, was maintained in cell line DAE100 in complete medium. R. rickettsii Hlp(#2), isolated from a Heamaphysalis leporispalustris tick (kindly provided by Robert Heinzen, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institutes of Health), was propagated in Ixodes scapularis cell line IDE2 (18). A Francisella sp. isolated from the soft tick Argas persicus and named "Wolbachia persica" (31) (obtained from the American Type Culture Collection as strain ATCC VR-331) was grown axenically in complete tick cell culture medium (23).
Microscopy. Tick cell morphology and culture confluency were determined by phase-contrast microscopy. The proportion of cells infected with rickettsialike organisms was quantified by light microscopy by using Giemsa-stained cells. For light microscopy, cells were centrifuged at 60 × g for 5 min onto glass microscope slides by using a Cytospin centrifuge (Shandon Southern Instruments, Sewickley, Pa.), air dried, fixed with methanol, and stained with Giemsa stain.
Cells were prepared at passage 14 for electron microscopy as described by Munderloh et al. (15).Isozyme analysis. We confirmed that cell line DAE100 cells were D. andersoni cells by performing isoelectric focusing of lactate dehydrogenases (LDH) and malic dehydrogenases (MDH) under nondenaturing conditions in polyacrylamide gels as described previously (18).
DNA isolation and preparation.
Rickettsial DNA was extracted
from infected cell lines (34). Briefly, cells were washed
twice in Hanks' balanced saline solution and mechanically ruptured by
forcing them through a 27-gauge needle attached to a 5-ml syringe to
release the intracellular microbes. To enrich for rickettsiae, large
cell fragments and intact tick cells were removed by low-speed
centrifugation (275 × g for 10 min). The supernatants
were filtered through a 5.0-µm-pore-size filter and centrifuged
(14,000 × g for 25 min at 4°C), and DNA was released
from the rickettsial pellet using proteinase K (12). The
Francisella sp. ("W. persica") was washed
twice in Hanks' balanced salt solution and centrifuged
(14,000 × g for 25 min at 4°C), and DNA was
extracted as described above for the pelleted filtrates. DNA was
extracted from a portion of the D. andersoni eggs used to
initiate cell line DAE100 by crushing the cells in proteinase K
(12). Samples were stored at
70°C until they were used
for PCR.
PCR amplification.
The oligonucleotide primers used in this
study (Table 1) were synthesized by Life
Technologies (Grand Island, N.Y.). All amplification conditions for all
PCR included an initial denaturing step of 95°C for 5 min, followed
by 35 cycles of primer-specific denaturing, annealing, and extension
steps and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min (see below). The
cycling temperatures used for denaturing, annealing, and primer
extension for the individual primer sets were as follows: reaction
mixtures containing the Ec16S primer pair (22)
were heated at 95°C for 1 min, at 55°C for 1 min, and at 72°C for
2 min; the RpCS.877p-RpCS.1258n and Rr190.70p-Rr190.602n primer sets
(27) were used with a temperature profile consisting of
95°C for 20 s, 48°C for 30 s, and 60°C for 2 min; the
Rr17 primer pair (35) was heated at 94°C for
30 s, at 57°C for 2 min, and at 70°C for 2 min; the F11-F5
primer pair (6) was heated at 94°C for 1 min, at 65°C
for 1 min, and at 72°C for 1 min; and for the TUL4-B primer pair
(20) the cycles consisted of 95°C for 1 min, 55°C for
1 min, and 72°C for 2 min. PCR were performed in 50-µl reaction
mixtures containing template DNA (5 µl) or H2O (negative
control), 10× PCR buffer (5 µl), MgCl2 (2.5 mM), a
mixture of primers (0.5 µM each), Taq DNA polymerase (2.5 U), and the four deoxynucleoside triphosphates (0.2 µM each). All PCR
were carried out with a RoboCycler thermocycler (Stratagene, La Jolla,
Calif.). Amplification products were separated by electrophoresis through 1.5% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized by UV illumination.
|
RFLP analysis. Restriction endonuclease digests of the rompA PCR product obtained from DaE100R by using RsaI and PstI were compared to the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns previously described for R. peacockii (22). As a control, R. rickettsii Hlp(#2) rompA PCR products were also digested in order to compare restriction profiles. Aliquots (10 µl each) of rompA PCR products (amplified by the Rr190.70p-Rr190.602n primer set) were digested for 4 h at 37°C with 1 µl (10 U) of restriction enzyme Rsal or Pstl and 1 µl of the appropriate buffer (Life Technologies). The digestion products were separated by electrophoresis through an 8% polyacrylamide gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized by UV illumination.
Indirect immunofluorescence assay. DAE100 cells were reacted with mouse anti-R. rickettsii monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to test for recognition of rickettsia-specific epitopes on the DaE100R cells (15). IDE2 tick cells infected with R. rickettsii Hlp(#2) were used as MAb-positive controls. Aliquots (10 µl each) of a 5-ml cell suspension were placed onto glass microscope slides and air dried. Samples were fixed, permeabilized, and labeled as described by Heinzen et al. (11). Briefly, cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 20 min, quenched in a 50 mM NH4Cl solution for 10 min, and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS. After a PBS wash, the indirect immunofluorescence assay slides were overlaid with either MAb 13-2 to 120-kDa surface antigen rOmpB or MAb 13-5 to 190-kDa surface antigen rOmpA (1) for 60 min at 37°C. MAbs 13-2 and 13-5 were diluted 1:100 in PBS with 3% bovine serum albumin. Bound MAbs were then labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated antibody to mouse immunoglobulin G (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.) for 60 min at 37°C. The slides were examined with an Olympus BH-2 microscope fitted for epifluorescence illumination.
DNA sequencing. DaE100R 16S rRNA, gltA, 17-kDa, and rompA PCR products were ligated into pGEM-T Easy vectors (Promega, Madison, Wis.) and then transformed into Escherichia coli (Epicurian Coli Supercompetent cells; Stratagene) for cloning as recommended by manufacturers. Three clones of each partial gene PCR product were sequenced in the forward and reverse directions by using an ABI 377 automated sequencer at the Advanced Genetic Analysis Center (University of Minnesota). Final sequences were deduced by aligning the resulting six sequences using the CLUSTAL W multiple-sequence alignment program (32).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The nucleotide sequences of the Ec16S, RpCS.877p-RpCS.1258n, Rr17, and Rr190.70p-Rr190.602n PCR products of the DaE100R strain of R. peacockii have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers AF097729, AF129885, AF260571, and AF129884, respectively.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Establishment of D. andersoni cell lines
infected with endosymbionts.
Cell lines were successfully
established from embryonic tissues of D. andersoni. After 1 year in culture (passage 8), small bacilliform microbes were observed
in one of the young cell lines. As these microbes did not grow in
cell-free medium, we suspected that they might be endosymbionts
associated with D. andersoni (20, 23), which so
far have proven to be refractory to in vitro cultivation. Therefore, we
decided to propagate the cell line (DAE100) that was chronically
infected with these microbes and to identify them by using molecular
methods. Most DAE100 cells adhered to the culture surface and were
round and refractile, while other cells were bipolar with prominent
pseudopodia and moderately translucent (Fig.
1A). The microbes persisted in the DAE100
cell line for more than 20 additional subcultures (>2 years). Microscopy of Giemsa-stained cells revealed that most
(>90%) of the cells were infected with rickettsialike organisms and
that some cells were heavily infected (Fig. 1B). The presence of the microorganisms did not have a cytopathic effect on the DAE100 cell line
as infected cells were capable of mitosis and were maintained through
continuous propagation in culture. In contrast, R. rickettsii Hlp(#2) produced plaques on adherent IDE2 cell cultures
and was maintained by weekly transfers of 5% portions of infected
cultures, in which approximately 100% of the cells were infected, to
fresh cell layers. The isoelectric focusing patterns for LDH and MDH confirmed that the cell line DAE100 cells were D. andersoni
cells. The approximate pI for LDH of DAE100 was 9.0 and was
identical to the pI for the LDH extracted from embryonic tissues of
D. andersoni. This LDH was distinctly different from the LDH
of the I. scapularis cell line IDE8 (18)
maintained in our laboratory, which had a pI of approximately 7.0 (Fig.
1C). The pI range for the most prominent MDH for both tick species was
8.0 to 9.0. However, the MDH of DAE100 and the embryonic tissue extract
had a slightly higher pI than the pI of the MDH from IDE8 cells
(18) (data not shown).
|
Ultrastructure of DAE100 and its endosymbiont, DaE100R.
Electron microscopy demonstrated that DAE100 cells were infected with
rickettsialike bacteria. Infected cells generally had a low
nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio and prominent cell surface pseudopodia and
were often filled with prominent vacuoles (Fig.
2A). Large numbers of the endosymbiont
were commonly found in both the cytoplasm and vacuoles of infected
cells, as well as the extracellular space. Microbes were concentrated
in discrete clusters in the cytoplasm but were not found within the
rough endoplasmic reticulum or the nuclei of infected cells.
Cytoplasmic DaE100R organisms appeared to be healthy as they divided by
binary fission and had a granular central cell body surrounded by a
trilaminar cell wall typical of gram-negative organisms. However, the
microbes in vacuoles were apparently being digested, as shown by their
electron-dense and degraded nature, and were often accompanied by
membrane whorls. The cell wall of the microbe consisted of an inner
cytoplasmic membrane, a periplasmic space, and an outer membrane with
an associated beaded microcapsular layer (Fig. 2B). There was a thin,
electron-translucent zone or slime layer outside the outer membrane of
the microorganism, which is characteristic of the SFG rickettsiae
(9); however, this zone or layer was not always
distinguishable.
|
Molecular confirmation that DaE100R is R. peacockii and
that it originated from D. andersoni ticks.
Analysis
of PCR products demonstrated that DaE100R was the SFG rickettsia
R. peacockii (22). PCR amplification with the eubacterium-specific Ec16S primer set yielded products of
the expected sizes (approximately 1,157 bp) and confirmed the bacterial nature of the DAE100 microbe (data not shown). Results obtained with
the Rickettsia-specific
RpCS.877p-RpCS.1258n (27) and
Rr17 (35) primer sets for the citrate synthase
(gltA) and 17-kDa genus-common antigen genes, respectively,
also placed the DAE100 microbe in the genus Rickettsia. The
RpCS.877p-RpCS.1258n and Rr17 primers
generated products of the expected sizes (about 381 and 434 bp,
respectively) (data not shown). Generation of an approximately 532-bp
product when the Rr190.70p-Rr190.602n primer set
for the rompA gene was used demonstrated that DaE100R was an
SFG rickettsia. The restriction patterns for the rompA
product of DaE100R obtained with RsaI (uncut) and
PstI (approximately 120, 160, and 250 bp) were identical to
those reported for R. peacockii Skalkaho (22) (Fig. 3). The sequences of the
Ec16S, RpCS.877p-RpCS.1258n,
Rr17, and Rr190.70p-Rr190.602n PCR
products of the DaE100R strain of R. peacockii were
determined. The partial rompA gene sequence of the
DAE100-associated microbe, DaE100R, was identical to that reported for
R. peacockii Skalkaho (GenBank accession number U55821). The
partial 16S ribosomal DNA sequence of DaE100R differed from that of
Skalkaho (GenBank accession number U55820) at 2 of 1,157 nucleotides
(substitution of G for T and substitution of A for C at positions
corresponding to positions 475 and 533, respectively, on the forward
strand of the R. rickettsii 16S rRNA gene).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tick cell culture has proven to be a viable means for isolation, maintenance, and subsequent characterization of tick-associated microbes (17). Inoculation of infected cells into established I. scapularis cell lines has resulted in isolation and continuous culture of the equine granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent, Ehrlichia equi, and the cattle pathogen Anaplasma marginale (14, 19). In addition, tick cell culture has been instrumental in examining the biological processes of tick-borne pathogens important for their survival within and transmission by vector hosts. Elucidation of host cell invasion and intracellular development of the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent and modulation of Borrelia burgdorferi virulence factors in ticks have been made possible with tick cell culture techniques (16, 24). The research reported here demonstrates the utility of initiating embryonic cell lines from ticks harboring transovarially transmitted rickettsiae for the purpose of isolating rickettsiae refractory to propagation in traditional vertebrate systems. Our results show that an established D. andersoni cell line, DAE100, was chronically infected with a rickettsia, DaE100R, identical to or closely related to R. peacockii Skalkaho. Furthermore, isozyme analysis of the DAE100 cell line confirmed that D. andersoni was the origin of the cell line. Likewise, RFLP analysis of a rickettsial PCR product amplified from embryonic tissues used to initiate the primary cultures confirmed that D. andersoni was the origin of the DaE100R isolate of R. peacockii.
Mechanisms of rickettsial pathogenesis in cell cultures have been analyzed previously. The Bitterroot and Sheila Smith strains of R. rickettsii disrupted cellular organelles and lysed infected vertebrate cells although the numbers of microbes in the vertebrate cells remained low (28, 36). The cytopathological effects of the Sheila Smith strain for chicken embyro cells included dilation of the rough endoplasmic reticulum and outer nuclear membrane (30, 33). These effects were postulated to have been caused by leakage of extracellular fluids into cells damaged by rickettsial penetration of host cell membranes. The cytopathic effects of the R. rickettsii R strain for both mammalian and tick cells were reported by Policastro et al. (26). Detachment and lysis of the infected tick cells were delayed but did eventually occur (26). We found that the Hlp(#2) strain of R. rickettsii was cytopathic for tick cells and that it infected and lysed Vero cells as well (Simser, unpublished data). Hlp(#2) is infectious for guinea pigs, producing both fever and scrotal swelling in these animals, and for chicken embryos (25). Therefore, we speculate that the mechanisms of pathogenicity of the R. rickettsii strains for tick cells are similar to those demonstrated for vertebrate cells. The in vitro biology of R. peacockii differed strikingly from that of R. rickettsii. R. peacockii cells often packed the cytoplasm of infected cells without any apparent ultrastructural evidence of host cell injury or plaque formation in the adherent DEA100 cell line. Despite high levels of infection (>90%), all indications were that DAE100 cells infected with R. peacockii remained viable. We successfully maintained R. peacockii by passaging the chronically infected cell line DAE100. Infected cells were capable of cytokinesis, and it was never necessary to add fresh, uninfected cells.
SFG rickettsiae utilize host cell actin to penetrate cellular membranes, which causes cell damage and results in cell-to-cell spread in vertebrate cell cultures (10, 29). SFG rickettsiae also polymerize actin in cultured tick cells. Rickettsia sp. strain MOAa and R. rickettsii Hlp(#2) have both been shown to induce actin polymerization in I. scapularis cells (15; Simser, unpublished). The rOmpA protein located on the rickettsial outer membrane is hypothesized to be involved in actin-based motility (4). The slime layer that surrounds the SFG rickettsiae is postulated to contain host cell actin utilized by these organisms for mobility (9, 11, 13). In fact, restoration of pathogenicity to R. rickettsii Wachsmuth 1974 for guinea pigs in feeding ticks has been correlated to expansion of the slime layer of this organism (9). The absence of R. peacockii from host cell rough endoplasmic reticulum and nuclei and the inability of this organism to lyse infected DAE100 cells suggest that this rickettsia is unable to polymerize host cell actin. Microscopic observation indicated that the slime layer of the avirulent organism R. peacockii was very thin and difficult to demonstrate, which may have been due to the lack of host cell actin in this region. R. peacockii has a premature translational stop codon in the 5' end of the rompA gene that appears to prevent production of a functional rOmpA protein and the ability to bind anti-rOmpA MAb 13-5 (22). In the wood tick, R. peacockii is restricted to the ovaries, posterior diverticula of the midgut, and Malpighian tubule tissues (3, 22). The apparent nonpathogenic nature of R. peacockii and its limited in vivo distribution might in part be a result of a defective rompA gene and an inability to undergo actin-based motility. In vitro cultivation of R. peacockii should allow us to study the mechanisms used by R. peacockii to spread and persist in infected cell cultures and to define the role of the rOmpA protein in rickettsial pathogenesis.
Previous reports have described the presence of R. peacockii in wood ticks collected from the eastern slopes of the Bitterroot Valley of western Montana (3, 22). Isolation of the DaE100R strain of R. peacockii from wood ticks collected in north central Colorado indicates that the distribution of this Rickettsia sp. is wider than previously demonstrated.
Niebylski et al. (20) reported the presence of a D. andersoni symbiont belonging to the genus Francisella in the ovarial cells of wood ticks coinfected with either R. rickettsii or Rickettsia bellii collected in Montana. The overall prevalence and identities of microorganisms belonging to different genera infecting the same cells of a tick remain to be defined. Our inability to detect a Francisella sp. by molecular methods suggests that the D. andersoni colony that was the source of embryonated eggs for the establishment of cell line DAE100 was free of Francisella spp.
Niebylski et al. (22) demonstrated the close relationship of R. peacockii, based on 16S ribosomal DNA and rompA sequence similarity assays, to members of the SFG rickettsiae that are pathogenic for mammals or ticks or both. Nonpathogenic SFG rickettsiae in ticks are speculated to have arisen from pathogenic rickettsiae that over time lost the ability to cause disease in both mammalian and tick hosts (8, 23). Conceivably, this process could be reversed under certain conditions. Therefore, studying the R. peacockii-tick association involves examining the phenomenon of transovarial transmission competition between nonpathogenic and pathogenic rickettsiae in ticks and defining the mechanisms that would allow nonpathogenic organisms to reemerge as pathogens. Moreover, understanding the mechanisms by which ticks and SFG rickettsiae interact should elucidate ways in which the nonpathogenic endosymbionts can be manipulated for control of both the ticks and the pathogens that they harbor.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Brianna C. Lenox and Thien N. Sam for technical assistance.
This work was supported by state funds from the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and a University of Minnesota Graduate School Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship award to Jason A. Simser.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, 1980 Folwell Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108. Phone: (612) 624-4740. Fax: (612) 625-5299. E-mail: kurtt001{at}maroon.tc.umn.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Anacker, R. L.,
R. E. Mann, and C. Gonzales.
1987.
Reactivity of monoclonal antibodies to Rickettsia rickettsii with spotted fever and typhus group rickettsiae.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
25:167-171 |
| 2. | Azad, A. F., and C. B. Beard. 1998. Rickettsial pathogens and their arthropod vectors. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 4:179-186[Medline]. |
| 3. | Burgdorfer, W., S. F. Hayes, and A. J. Mavros. 1981. Nonpathogenic rickettsiae in Dermacentor andersoni: a limiting factor for the distribution of Rickettsia rickettsii, p. 585-594. In W. Burgdorfer, and R. L. Anacker (ed.), Rickettsiae and rickettsial diseases. Academic Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 4. |
Charles, M.,
J. Magdalena,
J. A. Theriot, and M. B. Goldberg.
1999.
Functional analysis of a rickettsial OmpA homology domain of Shigella flexneri IcsA.
J. Bacteriol.
181:869-878 |
| 5. | Dasch, G. A., and E. Weiss. 1992. The genera Rickettsia, Rochalimaea, Ehrlichia, Cowdria, and Neorickettsia, p. 2407-2470. In A. Balows, H. G. Truper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder, and K.-H. Schleifer (ed.), The prokaryotes, vol. 3. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y. |
| 6. |
Forsman, M.,
G. Sandstrom, and A. Sjostedt.
1994.
Analysis of 16S ribosomal DNA sequences of Francisella strains and utilization for determination of the phylogeny of the genus and for identification of strains by PCR.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
44:38-46 |
| 7. | Hackstadt, T. 1996. The biology of rickettsiae. Infect. Agents Dis. 5:127-143[Medline]. |
| 8. | Hayes, S. F., and W. Burgdorfer. 1989. Interactions between rickettsial endocytobionts and their tick hosts, p. 235-251. In W. Schwemmler, and G. Gassner (ed.), Insect endocytobiosis: morphology, physiology, genetics, evolution. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla. |
| 9. |
Hayes, S. F., and W. Burgdorfer.
1982.
Reactivation of Rickettsia rickettsii in Dermacentor andersoni ticks: an ultrastructural analysis.
Infect. Immun.
37:779-785 |
| 10. |
Heinzen, R. A.,
S. S. Grieshaber,
L. S. Van Kirk, and C. J. Devin.
1999.
Dynamics of actin-based movement by Rickettsia rickettsii in Vero cells.
Infect. Immun.
67:4201-4207 |
| 11. |
Heinzen, R. A.,
S. F. Hayes,
M. G. Peacock, and T. Hackstadt.
1993.
Directional actin polymerization associated with spotted fever group rickettsia infection of Vero cells.
Infect. Immun.
61:1926-1935 |
| 12. | Higuchi, R. 1989. Simple and rapid preparation of samples for PCR, p. 31-43. In H. A. Ehrlich (ed.), PCR technology, principles and applications for DNA amplification. Stockton Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 13. |
Maupin-Szamier, P., and T. D. Pollard.
1978.
Actin filament destruction by osmium tetroxide.
J. Cell Biol.
77:837-852 |
| 14. | Munderloh, U. G., E. F. Blouin, K. M. Kocan, N. L. Ge, W. L. Edwards, and T. J. Kurtti. 1996. Establishment of the tick (Acari: Ixodidae)-borne cattle pathogen Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae). J. Med. Entomol. 33:656-664[Medline]. |
| 15. | Munderloh, U. G., S. F. Hayes, J. Cummings, and T. J. Kurtti. 1998. Microscopy of spotted fever rickettsia movement through tick cells. Microsc. Microanal. 4:115-121. |
| 16. |
Munderloh, U. G.,
S. D. Jauron,
V. Fingerle,
L. Leitritz,
S. F. Hayes,
J. M. Hautman,
C. M. Nelson,
B. W. Huberty,
T. J. Kurtti,
G. G. Ahlstrand,
B. Greig,
M. A. Mellencamp, and J. L. Goodman.
1999.
Invasion and intracellular development of the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent in tick cell culture.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:2518-2524 |
| 17. | Munderloh, U. G., and T. J. Kurtti. 1995. Cellular and molecular interrelationships between ticks and prokaryotic tick-borne pathogens. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 40:221-243[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Munderloh, U. G., Y. Liu, M. Wang, C. Chen, and T. J. Kurtti. 1994. Establishment, maintenance and description of cell lines from the tick Ixodes scapularis. J. Parasitol. 80:533-543[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. | Munderloh, U. G., J. E. Madigan, J. S. Dumler, J. L. Goodman, S. F. Hayes, J. E. Barlough, C. M. Nelson, and T. J. Kurtti. 1996. Isolation of the equine granulocutic ehrlichiosis agent, Ehrlichia equi, in tick cell culture. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:664-670[Abstract]. |
| 20. | Niebylski, M. L., M. G. Peacock, E. R. Fischer, S. F. Porcella, and T. G. Schwan. 1997. Characterization of an endosymbiont infecting wood ticks, Dermacentor andersoni, as a member of the genus Francisella. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:3933-3940[Abstract]. |
| 21. |
Niebylski, M. L.,
M. G. Peacock, and T. G. Schwan.
1999.
Lethal effect of Rickettsia rickettsii on its tick vector (Dermacentor andersoni).
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:773-778 |
| 22. |
Niebylski, M. L.,
M. E. Schrumpf,
W. Burgdorfer,
E. R. Fischer,
K. L. Gage, and T. G. Schwan.
1997.
Rickettsia peacockii sp. nov., a new species infecting wood ticks, Dermacentor andersoni, in western Montana.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
47:446-452 |
| 23. | Noda, H., U. G. Munderloh, and T. J. Kurtti. 1997. Endosymbionts of ticks and their relationship to Wolbachia spp. and tick-borne pathogens of humans and animals. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:3926-3932[Abstract]. |
| 24. |
Obonyo, M.,
U. G. Munderloh,
V. Fingerle,
B. Wilske, and T. J. Kurtti.
1999.
Borrelia burgdorferi in tick cell culture modulates expression of outer surface proteins A and C in response to temperature.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:2137-2141 |
| 25. | Parker, R. R., E. G. Pickens, D. B. Lackman, E. J. Bell, and F. B. Thraikill. 1951. Isolation and characterization of Rocky Mountain spotted fever rickettsiae from the rabbit tick Heamaphysalis leporispalustris Packard. Public Health Rep. 66:455-463[Medline]. |
| 26. |
Policastro, P. F.,
U. G. Munderloh,
E. R. Fischer, and T. Hackstadt.
1997.
Rickettsia rickettsii growth and temperature-inducible protein expression in embryonic tick cell lines.
J. Med. Microbiol.
46:839-845 |
| 27. |
Regnery, R. L.,
C. L. Spruill, and B. D. Plikaytis.
1991.
Genotypic identification of rickettsiae and estimation of intraspecies sequence divergence for portions of two rickettsial genes.
J. Bacteriol.
173:1576-1589 |
| 28. | Schaechter, M., F. M. Bozeman, and J. E. Smadel. 1957. Study on the growth of rickettsiae. II. Morphologic observations of living rickettsiae in tissue culture cells. Virology 3:160-172. |
| 29. | Silverman, D. J. 1989. Rickettsia rickettsii: an engimatic pathogen, p. 63-77. In J. W. Moulder (ed.), Intracellular parasitism. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla. |
| 30. |
Silverman, D. J., and C. L. Wisseman.
1979.
In vitro studies of rickettsia-host cell interactions: ultrastructural changes induced by Rickettsia rickettsii infection of chicken embryo fibroblasts.
Infect. Immun.
26:714-727 |
| 31. | Suitor, E. C., and E. Weiss. 1961. Isolation of a rickettsialike microorganism (Wolbachia persica, n. sp.) from Argus persicus (Oken). J. Infect. Dis. 108:95-106. |
| 32. |
Thompson, J. D.,
D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson.
1994.
CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:4673-4680 |
| 33. | Walker, D. H., and B. G. Cain. 1980. The rickettsial plaque. Evidence for direct cytopathic effect of Rickettsia rickettsii. Lab. Invest. 43:388-396[Medline]. |
| 34. |
Weller, S. J.,
G. D. Baldridge,
U. G. Munderloh,
H. Noda,
J. Simser, and T. J. Kurtti.
1998.
Phylogenetic placement of rickettsiae from the ticks Amblyomma americanum and Ixodes scapularis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:1305-1317 |
| 35. |
Williams, S. G.,
J. B. Sacci,
M. E. Schriefer,
E. M. Anderson,
K. K. Fujioka,
F. J. Sorvillo,
A. R. Barr, and A. F. Azad.
1992.
Typhus and typhuslike rickettsiae associated with opossums and their fleas in Los Angeles county, California.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:1758-1762 |
| 36. |
Wisseman, C. L.,
E. A. Edlinger,
A. D. Waddell, and M. R. Jones.
1976.
Infection cycle of Rickettsia rickettsii in chicken embryo and L-929 cells in culture.
Infect. Immun.
14:1052-1064 |
| 37. | Yunker, C. E. 1987. Preparation and maintenance of arthropod cell cultures: acari, with emphasis on ticks, p. 35-51. In C. E. Yunker (ed.), Arboviruses in arthropod cells in vitro, vol. 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»