Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2001, p. 721-724, Vol. 67, No. 2
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.2.721-724.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evaluation of Two Direct Plating Methods Using Nonradioactive
Probes for Enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in
Oysters
J. A.
Gooch,1,*
A.
DePaola,2
C. A.
Kaysner,3 and
D.
L.
Marshall4
U. S. Department of Commerce NOAA NOS
Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research,
Charleston, South Carolina 29412-91101;
U.S. FDA Gulf Coast Seafood Laboratory, Dauphin Island,
Alabama 36528-01582; U. S. FDA
Seafood Products Research Center, Bothell, Washington
98021-44213; and Department of
Food Science and Technology, Mississippi State University,
Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762-98054
Received 22 August 2000/Accepted 23 November 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Oysters (Crassostrea virginica) were collected monthly
from May 1998 to April 1999 from Mobile Bay, Ala., and analyzed to determine Vibrio parahaemolyticus densities at zero time
and after 5, 10, and 24 h of postharvest storage at 26°C. After
24 h of storage at 26°C, oysters were transferred to a
refrigerator at 3°C and then analyzed 14 to 17 days later. The
V. parahaemolyticus numbers were determined by the
most-probable-number procedure using alkaline phosphatase-labeled DNA
probe VPAP, which targets the species-specific thermolabile hemolysin
gene (tlh), to identify suspect isolates (MPN-VPAP
procedure). Two direct plating methods, one using a VPAP probe
(Direct-VPAP) and one using a digoxigenin-labeled probe (Direct-VPDig)
to identify suspect colonies, were compared to the MPN-VPAP procedure.
The results of the Direct-VPAP and Direct-VPDig techniques were highly
correlated (r = 0.91), as were the results of the
Direct-VPAP and MPN-VPAP procedures (r = 0.91). The
correlation between the Direct-VPDig and MPN-VPAP results was 0.85. The
two direct plating methods in which nonradioactive DNA probes were used
were equivalent to the MPN-VPAP procedure for identification of total
V. parahaemolyticus, and they were more rapid and less
labor-intensive.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Vibrio parahaemolyticus
is an enteric pathogen found in estuaries and various types of seafood
throughout the world (1, 2, 13-15). V. parahaemolyticus infections can cause gastroenteritis in humans
and are most frequently associated with consumption of raw or
undercooked seafood and seafood recontaminated with the bacterium after
cooking (19). Consumption of raw shellfish, primarily
oysters, has been linked to four multistate V. parahaemolyticus illness outbreaks involving 650 reported cases in
the United States since 1997 (Washington in 1997 and 1998; New York and
Texas in 1998) (4-6). All patient isolates obtained from
the 296 reported V. parahaemolyticus infections in Texas
were serotype O3:K6, which commonly causes outbreaks in Asia but had
not been identified previously in the United States (6).
These outbreaks increased concern about V. parahaemolyticus
densities in oysters and focused attention on the development of more
efficient methods for environmental monitoring of this pathogen.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological
Analytical Manual (BAM) most-probable-number (MPN)
method (11) is most frequently used to enumerate
V. parahaemolyticus in foods. The BAM-MPN method uses
biochemical techniques to identify isolates and is time-consuming and
labor-intensive. As an alternative, researchers recently described the
use of nonradioactive DNA probes for identification of V. parahaemolyticus (17).
In the present study we compared two direct plating methods using
nonradioactive DNA probes (Direct-VPAP and Direct-VPDig) with a
modification of the BAM-MPN method in which confirmation of the
identities of V. parahaemolyticus isolates was accomplished with a DNA probe (MPN-VPAP) targeting the species-specific thermolabile hemolysin gene (tlh) (21). In the Direct-VPAP
method we used a tlh-alkaline phosphatase
(tlh-AP)-labeled DNA probe, and in the Direct-VPDig method
we used a tlh-digoxigenin-labeled DNA probe for
identification of V. parahaemolyticus. Pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus strains contain additional hemolysin genes,
designated the thermostable direct hemolysin (tdh) gene and
the thermostable direct related hemolysin
(trh) gene (18, 20). Since V. parahaemolyticus densities in oysters can vary with the season,
salinity, temperature, and storage parameters (8), the
methods were tested under a variety of conditions over a 1-year period.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Oyster collection and handling.
Adult oysters (diameter,
>7.82 cm; Crassostrea virginica) were harvested monthly
from May 1998 through April 1999 by tonging in Mobile Bay, Ala. The
salinity and temperature of the surface water in the harvest area were
measured with a model 85 dissolved oxygen-conductivity meter (Yellow
Springs Instrument Co., Yellow Springs, Ohio). At each sampling time,
12 oysters were chilled on ice and 60 to 80 oysters were held without
icing at the ambient air temperature on the boat. The oysters were
transported to the FDA Gulf Coast Seafood Laboratory on Dauphin Island,
Ala., within 1 h of collection. The chilled oysters were analyzed
within 2 h to obtain harvest (zero-time) levels of V. parahaemolyticus, and the remaining nonchilled oysters were placed
in an incubator adjusted to 26°C.
Twelve of the oysters stored at 26°C were sampled and analyzed to
determine V. parahaemolyticus densities at 5, 10, and
24 h after harvest. The current protocol for handling oysters from the Gulf of Mexico calls for refrigeration within 10 to 36 h, depending on the ambient water temperature at the time of harvest (10). A 24-h holding period at 26°C was chosen for this
study in order to analyze oysters before, up to, and after the usual Gulf of Mexico oyster industry harvest times and refrigeration times.
After 24 h, the remaining oysters were transferred to a refrigerator (3°C) and then analyzed 14 to 17 days later to simulate possible retail handling practices. The oysters were scrubbed, shucked,
and mixed with an equal weight (1:1) of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (7.65 g of NaCl per liter, 0.724 g of anhydrous
Na2HPO4 [Sigma] per liter, 0.21 g of
KH2PO4 [Sigma] per liter; pH 7.4) (11), and the mixture was blended for 90 s with a
sterile Waring blender in preparation for analysis (9).
Enumeration by the MPN method.
The MPN method described in
the FDA BAM (11) was used to estimate V. parahaemolyticus densities, except that a species-specific DNA
probe targeting the tlh gene was used for identification
(MPN-VPAP) (17) instead of biochemical utilization assays.
This oligonucleotide probe conjugated with alkaline phosphatase
(tlh-AP) was purchased from DNA Technology A/S (Aarhus,
Denmark). Briefly, oyster homogenate was serially diluted, inoculated
into a series of MPN tubes containing alkaline peptone water
(11) (three tubes/dilution), and incubated for 16 to
18 h at 35°C, and then a loopful from each MPN tube showing
growth was streaked onto a thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts (TCBS) agar
plate. After 18 to 24 h of incubation at 35°C, suspect colonies
from the TCBS agar (Difco) streak plates were transferred with sterile
toothpicks into alkaline peptone water in individual wells of 96-well
plates and incubated for 16 to 18 h at 35°C. Cells from the 96-well
plates were transferred to Vibrio vulnificus agar (30 g of
NaCl [Sigma] per liter, 10 g of cellobiose [Sigma] per liter,
20 g of proteose peptone [Difco] per liter, 0.06 g of
bromthymol blue [Sigma] per liter, 25 g of agar [Difco] per liter) plates by using a 48-prong replicator (9). Colony
lifts were prepared and tested for hybridization with the
tlh-AP probe as described by McCarthy et al.
(17) for confirmation of species identity. V. parahaemolyticus TX 2103 (a human stool sample isolate) and
V. vulnificus MO6-24 (a human primary septicemia blood
isolate) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively.
Direct-VPAP enumeration.
Aliquots of oyster homogenate (0.2 g of a 1:1 [wt/wt] preparation in PBS [equivalent to 0.1 g], taken
directly from a blender, or 0.1-ml portions from subsequent 10-fold
dilutions in PBS) were spread plated onto T1N3
(1% tryptone [Difco], 3% NaCl, 2% agar; pH 7.2) plates. After
overnight incubation at 35°C, colony lift, hybridization, and
colorimetric detection analyses were done as described previously for
the tlh-AP probe (17). The nucleotide base
sequence of the alkaline phosphatase-labeled DNA probe was the sequence
from bases 904 to 927 of the species-specific V. parahaemolyticus
tlh gene (accession number M36437) (3, 17, 21). After
color development, colonies that hybridized with the tlh-AP
probe were determined visually.
Direct-VPDig enumeration.
The V. parahaemolyticus
species-specific tlh DNA fragments were synthesized with
primers by PCR as described by Brasher et al. (3).
Digoxigenin-labeled nucleotides were used to label the probe by the
procedures of Boehringer Mannheim (The Genius System User's
Guide for Filter Hybridization, version 2.9-92; Boehringer
Mannheim Corp., Indianapolis, Ind.) and Weagant et al.
(22). Nylon membranes (MagnaGraph; Osmonics-MSI,
Minnetonka, Minn.) were placed onto tryptic soy agar
(Difco) containing MgSO4 (TSAMS agar) (40 g of trytic soy
agar per liter, 20 g of NaCl per liter, 1.5 g of
MgSO4 [Sigma] per liter) plates and spread plated with
the dilutions of oyster homogenate described above. The plates were
incubated for 3 h at 35°C to repair sublethally injured cells,
and the membranes were then transferred (with the inoculated side of
each membrane up) to TCBS plates and incubated overnight at 40°C.
Probe and membrane preparation, hybridization, and colorimetric
detection were performed as described in The Genius System
User's Guide for Filter Hybridization (Boehringer Mannheim
Corp.), as outlined by McCarthy et al. (17) and Weagant et
al. (22).
Statistical analyses.
Bacterial densities were converted to
base 10 logarithms before being analyzed by Microsoft Excel and SAS.
Twelve-month geometric means were determined for each analytical
method. Samples with nondetectable colonies were assigned the minimum
detectable density on the basis of the volume examined. The statistical
methods used included linear regression analysis to compare
correlations between the analytical methods and analysis of variance to
compare differences between treatments (Direct-VPAP, Direct-VPDig, and
MPN-VPAP). An alpha level (P < 0.05) was considered a
minimum level of significance for each statistical method.
Within-treatment comparisons will be described elsewhere.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Regression analyses.
Figure 1
shows that there was close agreement between methods for enumerating
V. parahaemolyticus in oysters under a variety of seasonal
and storage conditions. It shows the regression lines and a line
of identity for the two direct plating methods versus the
MPN-VPAP method. The line of identity shows how the two direct plating methods compare with the MPN-VPAP procedure. The slopes of the
two direct plating regression lines are almost identical (the slope of
the Direct-VPAP regression line is 0.91, and the slope of the
Direct-VPDig regression line is 0.94). The V. parahaemolyticus estimates obtained with the methods were highly
correlated for either the Direct-VPAP and Direct-VPDig procedures or
the Direct-VPAP and MPN-VPAP procedures (r = 0.91); the
correlation between the Direct-VPDig and MPN-VPAP procedures was 0.85. Data from studies or monitoring programs obtained with any of these
methods could be compared (i.e., for risk assessment). The differences
between the direct plating and MPN methods appeared to be greatest at lower V. parahaemolyticus densities and may be
attributed to different detection sensitivities. Because the
MPN-VPAP method is more sensitive (3 MPN/g for a
0.1-g sample and 0.3 MPN/g for a 1-g sample) than the direct plating
methods (10 CFU/g for a 0.1-g sample), use of this method is
recommended when low V. parahaemolyticus densities are
suspected (e.g., during the winter when water temperatures are lower).
Under warm conditions, either direct plating method offers an
alternative that is more rapid, economical, and less labor-intensive
than the BAM-MPN procedure. Similar direct plating methods used for
V. vulnificus have shown that direct plating methods are
more precise than MPN analyses (9).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
V. parahaemolyticus densities
(log10 CFU/g or log10 MPN/g) in oysters
analyzed by the Direct-VPAP, Direct-VPDig, and MPN-VPAP methods. The
line of identity shows the points for which the results of all three
methods would be identical.
|
|
In a previous study in which methods were compared, DePaola
et al. (
7) used resource-intensive biochemical tests to
confirm
the identities of suspect
V. parahaemolyticus
colonies and based
direct plating estimates on only five suspect
colonies per sample.
The colony lift format used in this study
eliminated the need
to identify individual colonies and provided an
efficient way
to test all colonies on a
plate.
Mean densities by method.
The 12-month geometric mean V. parahaemolyticus densities for the three methods for samples
obtained at zero time and 5, 10, and 24 h and 14 to 17 days after
harvest are shown in Table 1. These
methods were tested by using oysters that were growing at wide ranges
of temperature and salinity and there were no significant differences
between method means at any time (P > 0.12) after either storage under warm conditions or long-term refrigeration. The
counts ranged from <10 to 800 CFU/g or 0.9 to 900 MPN/g at harvest,
depending upon the season. The levels of V. parahaemolyticus recovery in this study (i.e., Direct-VPAP
12-month geometric mean of 86 CFU/g) agree closely with those
previously reported for Gulf Coast oysters (8). The mean
V. parahaemolyticus density was 110 CFU/g in a seasonal
survey when the hydrophobic grid membrane filter method was used, and
the highest densities occurred in spring and summer (8).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Twelve-month mean V. parahaemolyticus values
for the three methods for samples obtained at zero time and after
5, 10, and 24 h and 14 to 17 days
|
|
The
V. parahaemolyticus densities increased during storage
at 26°C by 1.4 and 3 logs (12-month means) after 10 and 24 h,
respectively.
After 14 to 17 days of refrigeration at 3°C, the mean
count decreased
by only 0.9 log from the 24-h level, suggesting that
long-term
refrigeration may not substantially reduce the numbers of
bacteria
present in raw oysters. Johnson and Liston (
12)
observed similar
decreases in
V. parahaemolyticus densities
in naturally contaminated
oysters stored at 11°C (0.8-log reduction
after 8 days) and 5°C
(1.6-log reduction after 14
days).
The Direct-VPAP mean was slightly higher than the other two means at
each time point. The Direct-VPDig method included a repair
step on magnesium-supplemented TSAMS agar (
16), but the
levels
of recovery were comparable to those obtained with the
Direct-VPAP
method. The repair step was performed to account for
any cellular
damage due to temperature or salinity either before
harvest or
during storage and to compare the bacterial counts obtained
by
this method with those obtained by the Direct-VPAP procedure.
This
repair step may be insufficient to overcome the subsequent
inhibition
on the selective TCBS medium. The selective components
of TCBS medium
include oxgall, sodium citrate, and an alkaline
pH (pH 8.6). The
T
1N
3 agar used with the Direct-VPAP method
was
not selective, but its high salt concentration may inhibit
some
competing microflora. While optimization studies were not
conducted
with T
1N
3 agar, this
medium was simple and economical to prepare,
required no repair step,
limited colony spreading, and gave good
levels of
V. parahaemolyticus recovery under all experimental
conditions.
The Direct-VPAP method can be completed in 1 day,
compared with 2 days for the Direct-VPDig method and 3 to 4 days
for the BAM-MPN
method.
In conclusion, recent
V. parahaemolyticus illness outbreaks
emphasized the need for rapid, quantitative methods for environmental
monitoring of
V. parahaemolyticus levels in the environment.
Two
direct plating methods (the Direct-VPAP and Direct-VPDig methods)
using nonradioactive DNA probes were equivalent to the MPN-VPAP
procedure and provided a faster alternative for
V. parahaemolyticus enumeration and confirmation in oyster
samples.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Jessica Jones and Tony Previto of the Gulf Coast Seafood
Laboratory for their assistance with the project. SAS statistical analyses performed by Alfred B. Moore at Mississippi State University are gratefully acknowledged.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: U. S. Department
of Commerce NOAA NOS Center for Coastal Environmental Health and
Biomolecular Research, 219 Ft. Johnson Road, Charleston, SC 29412-9110. Phone: (843) 762-8643. Fax: (843) 762-8700. E-mail:
jan.gooch{at}noaa.gov.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Baross, J., and J. Liston.
1970.
Occurrence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and related hemolytic vibrios in marine environments of Washington state.
Appl. Microbiol.
20:179-186[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bartley, C. H., and L. W. Slanetz.
1971.
Occurrence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in estuarine waters and oysters of New Hampshire.
Appl. Microbiol.
21:965-966[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Brasher, C. W.,
A. DePaola,
D. D. Jones, and A. J. Bej.
1998.
Detection of microbial pathogens in shellfish with multiplex PCR.
Curr. Microbiol.
37:1-8[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
1998.
Outbreak of Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections associated with eating raw oysters Pacific Northwest, 1997.
Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.
47:457-462[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
1999.
Outbreak of Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection associated with eating raw oysters and clams harvested from Long Island Sound Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York, 1998.
Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.
48:48-51[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Daniels, N. A.,
L. MacKinnon,
R. Bishop,
S. Altekruse,
B. Ray,
R. M. Hammond,
S. Thompson,
S. Wilson,
N. H. Bean,
P. M. Griffin, and L. Slutsker.
2000.
Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections in the United States, 1973-1998.
J. Infect. Dis.
181:1661-1666[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
DePaola, A.,
L. H. Hopkins, and R. M. McPhearson.
1988.
Evaluation of four methods for enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
54:617-618[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
DePaola, A.,
L. H. Hopkins,
J. T. Peeler,
B. Wentz, and R. M. McPhearson.
1990.
Incidence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in United States coastal waters and oysters.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
56:2299-2302[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
DePaola, A.,
M. L. Motes,
D. W. Cook,
J. Veazey,
W. E. Garthright, and R. Blodgett.
1997.
Evaluation of an alkaline phosphatase-labeled DNA probe for enumeration of Vibrio vulnificus in Gulf Coast oysters.
J. Microbiol. Methods
29:115-120[CrossRef].
|
| 10.
|
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration.
1997.
National shellfish sanitation program guide for the control of molluscan shellfish, p. 53-55.
In
Interstate Shellfish Sanitation Conference U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, Washington, D.C.
|
| 11.
|
Elliot, E. L.,
C. A. Kaysner,
L. Jackson, and M. L. Tamplin.
1995.
Vibrio cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, and other Vibrio spp., p. 9.01-9.27.
In
Bacteriological analytical manual, 8th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Va.
|
| 12.
|
Johnson, H. C., and J. Liston.
1973.
Sensitivity of Vibrio parahaemolyticus to cold in oysters, fish fillets and crabmeat.
J. Food Sci.
38:437-441[CrossRef].
|
| 13.
|
Kaneko, T., and R. R. Colwell.
1973.
Ecology of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the Chesapeake Bay.
J. Bacteriol.
113:24-32[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Kaneko, T., and R. R. Colwell.
1975.
Incidence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Chesapeake Bay.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
30:251-257[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Kaneko, T., and R. R. Colwell.
1978.
The annual cycle of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Chesapeake Bay.
Microb. Ecol.
4:135-139[CrossRef].
|
| 16.
|
Ma-Lin, C. F. A., and L. R. Beuchat.
1980.
Recovery of chill-stressed Vibrio parahaemolyticus from oysters with enrichment broths supplemented with magnesium and iron salts.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
39:179-185[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
McCarthy, S. A.,
A. DePaola,
D. W. Cook,
C. A. Kaysner, and W. E. Hill.
1999.
Evaluation of alkaline phosphatase- and digoxigenin-labeled probes for detection of the thermolabile hemolysin (tlh) gene of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.
Lett. Appl. Microbiol.
28:66-70[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Raimondi, F.,
J. P. Kao,
C. Fiorentini,
A. Fabbri,
G. Donelli,
N. Gasparini,
A. Rubino, and A. Fasano.
2000.
Enterotoxicity and cytotoxicity of Vibrio parahaemolyticus thermostable direct hemolysin in in vitro systems.
Infect. Immun.
68:3180-3185[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Rippey, S. R.
1994.
Infectious diseases associated with molluscan shellfish consumption.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
7:419-425[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Shirai, H.,
H. Ito,
T. Hirayama,
Y. Nakabayashi,
K. Kumagai,
Y. Takeda, and M. Nishibuchi.
1990.
Molecular epidemiologic evidence for association of the thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH) and TDH-related hemolysin of Vibrio parahaemolyticus with gastroenteritis.
Infect. Immun.
58:3568-3573[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Taniguchi, H.,
H. Hirano,
S. Kubomura,
K. Higashi, and Y. Mizuguchi.
1986.
Comparison of the nucleotide sequences of the genes for the thermostable direct hemolysin and the thermolabile hemolysin from Vibrio parahaemolyticus.
Microb. Pathog.
1:425-432[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Weagant, S. D.,
J. A. Jagow,
K. C. Jinneman,
C. J. Omiecinski,
C. A. Kaysner, and W. E. Hill.
1999.
Development of digoxigenin-labeled PCR amplicon probes for use in the detection and identification of enteropathogenic Yersinia and shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli from foods.
J. Food. Prot.
62:438-443[Medline].
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2001, p. 721-724, Vol. 67, No. 2
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.2.721-724.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Datta, S., Janes, M. E., Simonson, J. G.
(2008). Immunomagnetic Separation and Coagglutination of Vibrio parahaemolyticus with Anti-Flagellar Protein Monoclonal Antibody. CVI
15: 1541-1546
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
DePaola, A., Nordstrom, J. L., Bowers, J. C., Wells, J. G., Cook, D. W.
(2003). Seasonal Abundance of Total and Pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Alabama Oysters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 1521-1526
[Abstract]
[Full Text]