This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferretti, R.
Right arrow Articles by Clementi, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferretti, R.
Right arrow Articles by Clementi, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ferretti, R.
Right arrow Articles by Clementi, F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2001, p. 977-978, Vol. 67, No. 2
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.2.977-978.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Twelve-Hour PCR-Based Method for Detection of Salmonella spp. in Food

R. Ferretti,1,* I. Mannazzu,1 L. Cocolin,2 G. Comi,2 and F. Clementi1

Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Agrarie ed Ambientali, 60100 Ancona,1 and Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, 33100 Udine,2 Italy

Received 24 July 2000/Accepted 13 November 2000


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

A PCR-based method for the detection of Salmonella spp. in food was developed. The method, set up on typical salami from the Italian region of Marche, is sensitive and specific and shows excellent correlation with the conventional method of reference when naturally contaminated foods are analyzed. Moreover, it can be easily performed within a maximum of 12 h from food sampling, thus allowing prompt detection of Salmonella spp. in the food stocks analyzed.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Salmonella spp. are facultative, intracellular parasites that invade the mucous membrane and are transmitted to humans mainly through meat, eggs, and poultry products (4). The conventional method used for Salmonella detection in food relies on preenrichment in buffered peptone water (BPW) and enrichment in selective media, followed by isolation on differential media and serological confirmation (6). The main limitation of this method is that it is time-consuming and requires 5 or 6 days during which the food stocks being analyzed are forbidden to be sold. Thus, several research groups have been working to optimize innovative and more rapid methods for the detection of Salmonella spp. (1, 2, 5, 7, 8). One of these, validated by the Association Française de Normalisation, allows the detection of Salmonella spp. in food within 24 h (5).

In this report, we propose a more rapid and simpler method that, relying on a 6-h nonselective enrichment in BPW followed by cell breaking and PCR, allows the detection of Salmonella spp. within a maximum of 12 h from the receipt of food samples.

All of the experiments were carried out on ciauscolo, which is a typical salami from the Italian region of Marche. Ciauscolo is a product at high risk of Salmonella contamination because it is made of finely chopped, raw pork and is matured for 15 days at temperatures gradually decreasing from 27 to 15°C, after which the salami is ready to be consumed.

To determine the lowest level of contamination that could be detected with this method, the experiments were conducted as described below. Ten grams of ciauscolo was homogenized with 90 ml of BPW (Oxoid, Basingstoke, England) by means of a Stomacher (400 Circulator PBI) at 260 rpm for 1 min, heat-treated at 85°C for 5 min, and inoculated as follows with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis or Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (provided by Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy). Aliquots of 1 ml of tenfold serial dilutions (10-4 to 10-9) of an overnight culture of Salmonella isolates containing 1 × 108 CFU ml-1, as confirmed by plate counting on brilliant green agar (Oxoid), were inoculated in 100 ml of each homogenized sample. Uninoculated heat-treated ciauscolo homogenates were used as a control. Immediately after the inoculation and after 2, 4, 6, and 8 h of nonselective enrichment in BPW at 37°C, 200 µl of each sample was combined with 10 µl of a 10-mg ml-1 proteinase K solution (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.), incubated at 65°C for 1 h, taken to 99°C for 10 min to inactivate the proteinase K, and cooled down at 4°C (3). PCRs were performed in 50-µl reaction mixtures containing 5 µl of the crude extract and 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3)-50 mM KCl-1.5 mM MgCl2-2 pg of each primer µl-1-1.25 IU of Taq DNA polymerase (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany)-0.125 mM each deoxynucleoside triphosphate. The PCRs were carried out in a Gene Amp PCR System 9700 (The Perkin-Elmer Corp., Norwalk, Conn.) under the following conditions: heat denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles (90 s at 95°C, 60 s at 62°C, and 90 s at 72°C), and an elongation step of 7 min at 72°C. The primers used were Salm3 (5'-GCTGCGCGCGAACGGCGAAG-3') and Salm4 (5'-TCCCGGCAGAGTTCCCATT-3'), which amplify a 389-bp fragment within the conserved invA gene sequence of Salmonella spp. (3). Salm3 and Salm4 proved to be highly specific for Salmonella spp. in the experimental conditions used in our study. In fact, these primers produced the characteristic 389-bp fragment when tested on 17 different Salmonella serovars. The results of the amplification were compared with a positive control represented by an "in-house" standard containing 106 S. enterica serovar Enteritidis or S. enterica serovar Typhimurium cells ml-1 and a negative control, in which the template DNA was replaced with sterile distilled water. Thirty microliters of each PCR product was analyzed by electrophoresis on a 2% Tris-borate-EDTA agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. The gel images were visualized by means of a Bio-Rad Gel DOC 1000 and acquired with Multi-Analyst software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, Calif.). All of the experiments were conducted in triplicate with both of the Salmonella serovars tested.

The method proposed proved to be sensitive and rapid. In fact, even though Salmonella spp. were undetectable immediately after the inoculation and after 2 h of incubation in BPW (data not shown), the 100-ml homogenates inoculated with 104, 103, and 102 CFU of Salmonella cells showed the 389-bp amplicon after 4 h of enrichment. After 6 h, Salmonella was also detectable in the samples inoculated with 1 ml of the 10-7 and 10-8 dilutions, virtually inoculated with 10 cells and 1 cell per 100 ml of homogenate, respectively. No signal was obtained from the homogenized samples inoculated with the 10-9 dilutions, which very likely did not contain Salmonella spp. (Fig. 1). As expected, S. enterica serovar Enteritidis and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium gave similar results, thus indicating that the method presented can detect different Salmonella serovars. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the method was not increased after 8 h of enrichment on BPW (data not shown), thus allowing definition of the optimal enrichment time as 6 h. This result represents an important advance in respect to other methods which, because they prescribe longer enrichment times, slow down the detection of Salmonella spp. in food samples (3, 7, 8). Moreover, taking into account that, after the nonselective enrichment in BPW, about 5 to 6 h is required for the preparation of the crude extract, PCR, and electrophoresis, the detection of Salmonella spp. with this method is completed within a maximum of 12 h from food sampling. Another main advantage of this method is that the interpretation of the results is immediate. In fact, as Salm3 and Salm4 do not amplify any nonspecific PCR products in the experimental conditions utilized, the presence or absence of Salmonella spp. in food is unequivocally reflected by the presence or absence of the 389-bp amplicon on the gel.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified DNA extracted from food homogenates after inoculation with S. enterica serovar Enteritidis and incubation for 6 h at 37°C in BPW. Lanes: 1, DNA Molecular Weight Marker VI (Roche); 2, uninoculated food homogenate; 3 to 8, food samples inoculated respectively with 104, 103, 102, 10, 1, and 0 CFU per 100 ml of food homogenate; 9, PCR negative control; 10, pure culture of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis (positive control). The data shown are representative of three independent experiments.

The detection of Salmonella cells may be easier in inoculated than in naturally contaminated samples. In fact, while in the first case fresh and active cultures of this pathogen are inoculated in pasteurized samples, in the second case Salmonella cells, besides competing with the composite microflora responsible for salami fermentation, may be stressed and less viable as a consequence of the temperatures involved in the salami maturation process (8). Thus, in order to test the capability of this method to detect Salmonella in naturally contaminated food, 10 mature ciauscolo, coming from four separate lots, were sampled after 15 days of maturation, subjected to 6 h of enrichment in BPW, and processed as already described. In parallel, all of the samples were analyzed by means of the conventional method (6).

Surprisingly, Salmonella cells were detected in all of the samples, with both the conventional method and the 12-h PCR-based test (Fig. 2). This result, besides highlighting the fact that ciauscolo is a product at high risk of Salmonella contamination, indicates that the method proposed shows excellent correlation with the conventional method of reference (6) and confirms its specificity when naturally contaminated foods are analyzed.


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   Agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR-amplified DNA extracted from the homogenates of 10 different naturally contaminated ciauscolo, incubated for 6 h at 37°C in BPW. Lanes: 1, PCR negative control; 2, DNA Molecular Weight Marker VI (Roche); 3 to 12, ciauscolo homogenates 1 to 10, respectively; 13, pure culture of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis (positive control). The data shown are representative of three independent experiments.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Agrarie ed Ambientali, Via Brecce Bianche, 60100 Ancona, Italy. Phone: +390 71 2204782. Fax: +390 71 2204858. E-mail: anmicro{at}popcsi.unian.it.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Bailey, J. L. 1998. Detection of Salmonella cells within 24 to 26 hours in poultry samples with the polymerase chain reaction BAX system. J. Food Prot. 61:792-795[Medline].
2. Bennett, A. R., D. Greenwood, C. Tennant, J. G. Banks, and R. P. Betts. 1998. Rapid and definitive detection of Salmonella in foods by PCR. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 26:437-441[CrossRef][Medline].
3. Cocolin, L., M. Manzano, C. Cantoni, and G. Comi. 1998. Use of polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis to directly detect and identify Salmonella typhimurium in food. J. Appl. Microbiol. 85:673-677[Medline].
4. D'Aoust, J. Y. 1991. Pathogenicity of foodborne Salmonella. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 12:14-70.
5. Fach, P., F. Dilasser, J. Grout, and J. Tache. 1999. Evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction-based test for detecting Salmonella spp. in food samples: Probelia Salmonella spp. J. Food Prot. 62:1387-1393[Medline].
6. International Organization for Standardization. 1991. Microbiology---general guidance on methods for the detection of Salmonella. (Revision of 2nd ed., ISO, 6579, 1990.) International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
7. Manzano, M., L. Cocolin, G. Astori, C. Pipan, G. A. Botta, C. Cantoni, and G. Comi. 1998. Development of a PCR microplate-capture hybridization method for simple, fast and sensitive detection of Salmonella serovars in food. Mol. Cell. Probes 11:459-462.
8. Waage, A. S., T. Vardund, V. Lund, and G. Kapperud. 1999. Detection of low numbers of Salmonella in environmental water, sewage and food samples by a nested polymerase chain reaction assay. J. Appl. Microbiol. 87:418-428[CrossRef][Medline].


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2001, p. 977-978, Vol. 67, No. 2
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.2.977-978.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Muniesa, M., Blanch, A. R., Lucena, F., Jofre, J. (2005). Bacteriophages May Bias Outcome of Bacterial Enrichment Cultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 4269-4275 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferretti, R.
Right arrow Articles by Clementi, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferretti, R.
Right arrow Articles by Clementi, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ferretti, R.
Right arrow Articles by Clementi, F.