Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2001, p. 977-978, Vol. 67, No. 2
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.2.977-978.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Twelve-Hour PCR-Based Method for Detection of
Salmonella spp. in Food
R.
Ferretti,1,*
I.
Mannazzu,1
L.
Cocolin,2
G.
Comi,2 and
F.
Clementi1
Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Agrarie ed
Ambientali, 60100 Ancona,1 and
Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, 33100 Udine,2 Italy
Received 24 July 2000/Accepted 13 November 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
A PCR-based method for the detection of Salmonella spp.
in food was developed. The method, set up on typical salami from the Italian region of Marche, is sensitive and specific and shows excellent
correlation with the conventional method of reference when naturally
contaminated foods are analyzed. Moreover, it can be easily performed
within a maximum of 12 h from food sampling, thus allowing prompt
detection of Salmonella spp. in the food stocks analyzed.
 |
TEXT |
Salmonella spp. are
facultative, intracellular parasites that invade the mucous membrane
and are transmitted to humans mainly through meat, eggs, and poultry
products (4). The conventional method used for
Salmonella detection in food relies on preenrichment in
buffered peptone water (BPW) and enrichment in selective media, followed by isolation on differential media and serological
confirmation (6). The main limitation of this method is
that it is time-consuming and requires 5 or 6 days during which the
food stocks being analyzed are forbidden to be sold. Thus, several
research groups have been working to optimize innovative and more rapid
methods for the detection of Salmonella spp. (1, 2, 5,
7, 8). One of these, validated by the Association
Française de Normalisation, allows the detection of
Salmonella spp. in food within 24 h (5).
In this report, we propose a more rapid and simpler method that,
relying on a 6-h nonselective enrichment in BPW followed by cell
breaking and PCR, allows the detection of Salmonella spp. within a maximum of 12 h from the receipt of food samples.
All of the experiments were carried out on ciauscolo, which is a
typical salami from the Italian region of Marche. Ciauscolo is a
product at high risk of Salmonella contamination because it
is made of finely chopped, raw pork and is matured for 15 days at
temperatures gradually decreasing from 27 to 15°C, after which the
salami is ready to be consumed.
To determine the lowest level of contamination that could be detected
with this method, the experiments were conducted as described below.
Ten grams of ciauscolo was homogenized with 90 ml of BPW (Oxoid,
Basingstoke, England) by means of a Stomacher (400 Circulator PBI) at
260 rpm for 1 min, heat-treated at 85°C for 5 min, and inoculated as
follows with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis or
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (provided by
Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy). Aliquots of 1 ml of
tenfold serial dilutions (10
4 to 10
9) of an
overnight culture of Salmonella isolates containing 1 × 108 CFU ml
1, as confirmed by plate
counting on brilliant green agar (Oxoid), were inoculated in 100 ml of
each homogenized sample. Uninoculated heat-treated ciauscolo
homogenates were used as a control. Immediately after the inoculation
and after 2, 4, 6, and 8 h of nonselective enrichment in BPW at
37°C, 200 µl of each sample was combined with 10 µl of a 10-mg
ml
1 proteinase K solution (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis,
Mo.), incubated at 65°C for 1 h, taken to 99°C for 10 min to
inactivate the proteinase K, and cooled down at 4°C (3).
PCRs were performed in 50-µl reaction mixtures containing 5 µl of
the crude extract and 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3)-50 mM KCl-1.5 mM
MgCl2-2 pg of each primer µl
1-1.25 IU of
Taq DNA polymerase (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany)-0.125 mM each deoxynucleoside triphosphate. The PCRs were
carried out in a Gene Amp PCR System 9700 (The Perkin-Elmer Corp.,
Norwalk, Conn.) under the following conditions: heat denaturation at
95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles (90 s at 95°C, 60 s at 62°C, and 90 s at 72°C), and an elongation step of 7 min at
72°C. The primers used were Salm3 (5'-GCTGCGCGCGAACGGCGAAG-3')
and Salm4 (5'-TCCCGGCAGAGTTCCCATT-3'), which amplify a
389-bp fragment within the conserved invA gene sequence of
Salmonella spp. (3). Salm3 and Salm4 proved to
be highly specific for Salmonella spp. in the experimental
conditions used in our study. In fact, these primers produced the
characteristic 389-bp fragment when tested on 17 different
Salmonella serovars. The results of the amplification were
compared with a positive control represented by an "in-house" standard containing 106 S. enterica serovar
Enteritidis or S. enterica serovar Typhimurium cells
ml
1 and a negative control, in which the template DNA was
replaced with sterile distilled water. Thirty microliters of each PCR
product was analyzed by electrophoresis on a 2% Tris-borate-EDTA
agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. The gel images were
visualized by means of a Bio-Rad Gel DOC 1000 and acquired with
Multi-Analyst software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, Calif.). All of
the experiments were conducted in triplicate with both of the
Salmonella serovars tested.
The method proposed proved to be sensitive and rapid. In fact, even
though Salmonella spp. were undetectable immediately after the inoculation and after 2 h of incubation in BPW (data not
shown), the 100-ml homogenates inoculated with 104,
103, and 102 CFU of Salmonella cells
showed the 389-bp amplicon after 4 h of enrichment. After 6 h, Salmonella was also detectable in the samples inoculated
with 1 ml of the 10
7 and 10
8 dilutions,
virtually inoculated with 10 cells and 1 cell per 100 ml of homogenate,
respectively. No signal was obtained from the homogenized samples
inoculated with the 10
9 dilutions, which very likely did
not contain Salmonella spp. (Fig.
1). As expected, S. enterica
serovar Enteritidis and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium
gave similar results, thus indicating that the method presented can
detect different Salmonella serovars. Furthermore, the
sensitivity of the method was not increased after 8 h of
enrichment on BPW (data not shown), thus allowing definition of the
optimal enrichment time as 6 h. This result represents an
important advance in respect to other methods which, because they
prescribe longer enrichment times, slow down the detection of
Salmonella spp. in food samples (3, 7, 8).
Moreover, taking into account that, after the nonselective enrichment
in BPW, about 5 to 6 h is required for the preparation of the
crude extract, PCR, and electrophoresis, the detection of
Salmonella spp. with this method is completed within a
maximum of 12 h from food sampling. Another main advantage of this
method is that the interpretation of the results is immediate. In fact,
as Salm3 and Salm4 do not amplify any nonspecific PCR products in the
experimental conditions utilized, the presence or absence of
Salmonella spp. in food is unequivocally reflected by the
presence or absence of the 389-bp amplicon on the gel.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified DNA
extracted from food homogenates after inoculation with S. enterica serovar Enteritidis and incubation for 6 h at 37°C
in BPW. Lanes: 1, DNA Molecular Weight Marker VI (Roche); 2, uninoculated food homogenate; 3 to 8, food samples inoculated
respectively with 104, 103, 102,
10, 1, and 0 CFU per 100 ml of food homogenate; 9, PCR negative
control; 10, pure culture of S. enterica serovar
Enteritidis (positive control). The data shown are representative
of three independent experiments.
|
|
The detection of Salmonella cells may be easier in
inoculated than in naturally contaminated samples. In fact, while in
the first case fresh and active cultures of this pathogen are
inoculated in pasteurized samples, in the second case
Salmonella cells, besides competing with the composite
microflora responsible for salami fermentation, may be stressed and
less viable as a consequence of the temperatures involved in the salami
maturation process (8). Thus, in order to test the
capability of this method to detect Salmonella in naturally
contaminated food, 10 mature ciauscolo, coming from four separate lots,
were sampled after 15 days of maturation, subjected to 6 h of
enrichment in BPW, and processed as already described. In parallel, all
of the samples were analyzed by means of the conventional method
(6).
Surprisingly, Salmonella cells were detected in all of the
samples, with both the conventional method and the 12-h PCR-based test
(Fig. 2). This result, besides
highlighting the fact that ciauscolo is a product at high risk of
Salmonella contamination, indicates that the method proposed
shows excellent correlation with the conventional method of reference
(6) and confirms its specificity when naturally
contaminated foods are analyzed.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR-amplified DNA
extracted from the homogenates of 10 different naturally contaminated
ciauscolo, incubated for 6 h at 37°C in BPW. Lanes: 1, PCR
negative control; 2, DNA Molecular Weight Marker VI (Roche); 3 to 12, ciauscolo homogenates 1 to 10, respectively; 13, pure culture of
S. enterica serovar Enteritidis (positive control). The
data shown are representative of three independent experiments.
|
|
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dipartimento di
Biotecnologie Agrarie ed Ambientali, Via Brecce Bianche, 60100 Ancona, Italy. Phone: +390 71 2204782. Fax: +390 71 2204858. E-mail:
anmicro{at}popcsi.unian.it.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bailey, J. L.
1998.
Detection of Salmonella cells within 24 to 26 hours in poultry samples with the polymerase chain reaction BAX system.
J. Food Prot.
61:792-795[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bennett, A. R.,
D. Greenwood,
C. Tennant,
J. G. Banks, and R. P. Betts.
1998.
Rapid and definitive detection of Salmonella in foods by PCR.
Lett. Appl. Microbiol.
26:437-441[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Cocolin, L.,
M. Manzano,
C. Cantoni, and G. Comi.
1998.
Use of polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis to directly detect and identify Salmonella typhimurium in food.
J. Appl. Microbiol.
85:673-677[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
D'Aoust, J. Y.
1991.
Pathogenicity of foodborne Salmonella.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
12:14-70.
|
| 5.
|
Fach, P.,
F. Dilasser,
J. Grout, and J. Tache.
1999.
Evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction-based test for detecting Salmonella spp. in food samples: Probelia Salmonella spp.
J. Food Prot.
62:1387-1393[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
International Organization for Standardization.
1991.
Microbiology general guidance on methods for the detection of Salmonella. (Revision of 2nd ed., ISO, 6579, 1990.)
International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
|
| 7.
|
Manzano, M.,
L. Cocolin,
G. Astori,
C. Pipan,
G. A. Botta,
C. Cantoni, and G. Comi.
1998.
Development of a PCR microplate-capture hybridization method for simple, fast and sensitive detection of Salmonella serovars in food.
Mol. Cell. Probes
11:459-462.
|
| 8.
|
Waage, A. S.,
T. Vardund,
V. Lund, and G. Kapperud.
1999.
Detection of low numbers of Salmonella in environmental water, sewage and food samples by a nested polymerase chain reaction assay.
J. Appl. Microbiol.
87:418-428[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2001, p. 977-978, Vol. 67, No. 2
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.2.977-978.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Muniesa, M., Blanch, A. R., Lucena, F., Jofre, J.
(2005). Bacteriophages May Bias Outcome of Bacterial Enrichment Cultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 4269-4275
[Abstract]
[Full Text]