Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2001, p. 1154-1162, Vol. 67, No. 3
Division of Environmental Health Sciences,
Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New
York 10032,1 and Center for
Environmental Research and Conservation, Columbia University, New
York, New York 100272
Received 18 September 2000/Accepted 13 December 2000
Cryptosporidium, an enteric parasite of
humans and a wide range of other mammals, presents numerous challenges
to the supply of safe drinking water. We performed a wildlife survey,
focusing on white-tailed deer and small mammals, to assess whether they may serve as environmental sources of Cryptosporidium. A
PCR-based approach that permitted genetic characterization via sequence analysis was applied to wildlife fecal samples (n = 111)
collected from September 1996 to July 1998 from three areas in lower
New York State. Southern analysis revealed 22 fecal samples containing Cryptosporidium small-subunit (SSU) ribosomal DNA; these
included 10 of 91 white-tailed deer (Odocoileus
virginianus) samples, 3 of 5 chipmunk (Tamias
striatus) samples, 1 of 2 white-footed mouse (Peromyscus
leucopus) samples, 1 of 2 striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis) samples, 1 of 5 racoon (Procyon lotor)
samples, and 6 of 6 muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) samples.
All of the 15 SSU PCR products sequenced were characterized as
Cryptosporidium parvum; two were identical to genotype 2 (bovine), whereas the remainder belonged to two novel SSU sequence
groups, designated genotypes 3 and 4. Genotype 3 comprised four
deer-derived sequences, whereas genotype 4 included nine sequences from
deer, mouse, chipmunk, and muskrat samples. PCR analysis was performed
on the SSU-positive fecal samples for three other
Cryptosporidium loci (dihydrofolate reductase,
polythreonine-rich protein, and beta-tubulin), and 8 of 10 cloned PCR
products were consistent with C. parvum genotype 2. These
data provide evidence that there is sylvatic transmission of C. parvum involving deer and other small mammals. This study affirmed the importance of wildlife as potential sources of
Cryptosporidium in the catchments of public water supplies.
Cryptosporidium is
a genus of protozoan parasites that causes gastrointestinal disease in
humans and other vertebrates (6). Transmission occurs when
infectious oocysts shed in the feces of an infected host are
ingested by a new host. Numerous species of Cryptosporidium
are currently recognized as affecting mammals; these species include
C. parvum, C. muris, C. wrairi, and C. felis (6, 24). C. parvum has been reported
to be present in approximately 70 species of mammals belonging to nine
orders (11, 25, 37), whereas C. muris, C. wrairi, and C. felis appear to have more restricted
host ranges (reviewed in reference 24). In addition, C. parvum variants or strains have been identified; although
there is controversy regarding the phylogenetic status and nomenclature of these organisms, a convention for genotype designations using numbers and/or names has developed (49). Two C. parvum genotypes, genotype 1 (human) and genotype 2 (bovine),
appear to be responsible for the majority of infections in humans
(19, 20, 23; summarized in reference 48).
The natural ecology of C. parvum probably involves sylvatic
cycles with transmission among wild mammals in which the infection may
be largely asymptomatic (7, 37). Zoonotic cycles also occur in agricultural settings where high infection rates are seen in
domestic animals, particularly dairy cattle (12, 21, 28, 40,
43). There is also an anthroponotic cycle that is either
direct via person-to-person transmission or indirect (e.g, when human
sewage contaminates the drinking water supply) (21). Water
may serve as an important intersection for these cycles; effluents from
sewage treatment plants and septic tanks and runoff from agricultural
lands and forests can all have an impact on the surface water supply
(17, 26, 34, 35). The observation that rainfall appears to
have been an important factor in some drinking water outbreaks supports
this premise (31).
Surface water supplies are vulnerable to Cryptosporidium
contamination from a variety of sources. Watershed protection programs attempt to control such inputs from anthropogenic and agricultural sources (1, 34), but wildlife remains largely beyond the reach of management efforts. Numerous wild mammals have been shown to
be infected with Cryptosporidium spp. (11, 25,
37). White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) are
of particular concern in the eastern United States because of their
high population densities in both rural and suburban areas, including
the watersheds of New York City's Catskill-Delaware and Croton water
supply systems. Cryptosporidium infection has
been reported in both captive and wild white-tailed deer populations in
the mid-Atlantic, southern, and western United States (11,
13, 29). We performed a survey of wildlife in lower New York
State; focusing on white-tailed deer and small mammals, to assess
whether they might be an environmental source of
Cryptosporidium.
Wildlife sample collection.
Wildlife fecal samples were
collected from three sites in New York State: Black Rock Forest, a
1,500-ha research station located in Cornwall, N.Y., 50 miles north of
New York City; Louis Calder Center of Fordham University, a biological
field station located in Westchester County in Armonk, N.Y., within the
local watershed of the Kensico reservoir; and forested lands buffering
the New Croton Reservoir, adjacent to the Stanwood community in
Westchester County (with permission from the New York City Department
of Environmental Protection).
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.3.1154-1162.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Cryptosporidium parvum Infection
Involving Novel Genotypes in Wildlife from Lower New York
State
and
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
20°C (deer and muskrat specimens) or held in sodium acetate-acetic
acid-formalin preservative for less than 30 days, washed in 1×
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and refrigerated at 4°C (mice,
chipmunk, racoon, and skunk specimens).
Molecular epidemiology. Routine methods for detection and diagnosis of Cryptosporidium infection in feces are inadequate for the purposes of molecular epidemiology. Besides being relatively insensitive (42), they provide incomplete information with respect to the species of Cryptosporidium detected (i.e., there is limited specificity for C. parvum versus other species) and no means of differentiating among different genotypes, isolates, or strains (42). The diagnostic PCR protocols available at the time of this study typically involved either purified oocysts or diarrheal samples known a priori to contain Cryptosporidium (18). In contrast, we developed a diagnostic PCR assay (see below) to detect Cryptosporidium DNA when oocysts are present in formed stools at low concentrations. In order to increase both the specificity and the sensitivity of the PCR assay, Southern analysis was included. A positive result was defined as detection of a DNA product of the expected size following Southern analysis. This PCR-based approach also permitted genetic characterization of the isolates through cloning and sequencing of PCR products.
DNA extraction from wildlife feces. Fecal samples were processed in a designated area separate from the PCR setup and post-PCR zones. Reagents and equipment, such as pipettors, were dedicated to each of the three stages (sample preparation, PCR setup, and post-PCR).
Fecal material (1 to 1.5 g) was mixed with 4 to 6 ml of ice-cold PBS. The resulting slurry was washed through a funnel screening device (Meridien Contrate) with additional PBS into a 50-ml tube, shaken vigorously, and centrifuged for 5 min at 500 × g (42). The supernatant was discarded, and the sediment (~0.5 g) was transferred to a 2-ml tube (with a screw top and an Oring; Biospec Corp.) and centrifuged for 1 min at 16,000 × g (maximum speed). The supernatant was discarded, and 1.1 ml of DNAzol (MRC Corp.) plus ~2.5 g of 0.1-mm-diameter zirconium-silica beads (Biospec Corp.) were added (50). Samples were homogenized at 4,200 rpm for 5 min in a Mini-BeadBeater (Biospec Corp.) and then incubated in a water bath for 10 min at 90°C (9, 50). The tubes were pierced with a 26G1/2 needle, and each tube was piggybacked on a new microcentrifuge tube inside a 15-ml tube and then centrifuged for 2 min at 2,000 × g. The lysate recovered (~1 ml) was purified by phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) extraction, and the DNA was precipitated with 100% ethanol in the presence of 5 µl of polyacryl carrier (MRC Corp.). The DNA pellets were washed twice with 95% ethanol, air dried for 10 min, eluted with 100 µl of 8 mM NaOH, incubated at 65°C for 5 min, and centrifuged for 10 min at 16,000 × g to remove insoluble material. Each supernatant containing DNA was transferred to a new tube containing 10 µl of 0.1 M HEPES (final pH ~8). The process controls used were GCHIP, an unprocessed fecal sample from an experimentally infected calf at the Tufts School of Veterinary Medicine (provided by G. Widmer); and a deer fecal sample spiked with 105 oocysts (previously purified from isolate GCH1) per g.PCR analysis.
Formed stools contain an enormous array of
microorganisms, and stools also often contain PCR inhibitors
(10). The adequacy of DNA isolation and purification was
assessed for each isolate by first performing PCR amplification with a
nonspecific primer set (LSU primer set) targeting large-subunit rRNA
genes (Table 1) that could prime from a
broad range of templates. The template quantities were adjusted or
additional phenol-chloroform extractions were performed as needed for
the subset of isolates that did not initially produce a detectable
(~280-bp) PCR product with the LSU primer set. PCR amplification was
then performed with the SSU primer set to amplify a ~435-bp region of
the small-subunit (SSU) rRNA gene (Table 1) that spans the
hypervariable region. The SSU primers anneal to all known
Cryptosporidium SSU rRNA genes (10). The
presence of five copies of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) unit in C. parvum (16) enhanced the assay's ability to detect very-low-level infections. PCR amplifications in which control DNA
(Cryptosporidium DNA previously extracted from isolate GCH1 or KSU-1) was used with the diagnostic SSU primers consistently generated positive products (as determined by visual detection following gel electrophoresis and UV transillumination) at template levels of 1.0 pg of DNA (equivalent to approximately 20 oocysts).
|
-tubulin gene (B-TUB), a
polythreonine-rich gene [POLY(T)], and the dihydrofolate reductase
gene (DHFR) (3-5, 36, 39, 45) (Table 1). The target
sequences have been analyzed for C. parvum genotypes 1 and 2 (the human and bovine genotypes, respectively), and the corresponding
sequence polymorphisms have been documented; furthermore, each of these
genes is present as a single copy (30, 36, 39, 45).
Standard 50-µl PCR mixtures consisted of 5 to 50 ng of DNA template
and the following reagents (final concentrations): 2.5 mM
MgCl2, each deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate at a
concentration of 0.2 mM, 1× PCR buffer, 250 µg of bovine serum
albumin per ml, 0.4 mM forward primer, 0.4 mM reverse primer, and 1.25 U of Taq polymerase (AmpliTaq Gold; PE Applied Biosystems).
Positive and negative controls containing 1 pg of C. parvum
DNA and no template, respectively, were included in all experiments. A
hot start PCR was performed (model 480 thermal cycler; PE Applied
Biosystems) by using the following conditions: 95°C for 9 min
(Taq activation), followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for
45 s, 60°C (or another temperature as specified in Table 1) for
45 s, and 72°C for 45 s, and a final extension at 72°C
for 7 min. A 10-µl aliquot of each PCR mixture was examined by gel
electrophoresis on 3.5% agarose (NuSieve; FMC Corp) that was stained
with 1% GelStar DNA stain (FMC Corp.) and visualized with a UV
transilluminator. DNA was transferred from the gels via Southern
blotting onto nylon filters by standard methods (2).
Southern analysis.
Southern analysis of the products from
the PCR amplifications was performed by standard methods
(2). All of the DNA probes used were PCR products
amplified from C. parvum genomic DNA (GCH1 or KSU-1) that
had been cloned into pCRII. The following probes were used: SSU rRNA
gene p17-16 (16); -tubulin gene B-TUB3/4 (45); polythreonine-rich gene CRY44/37
(5); and dihydrofolate reductase gene DHFR201. The SSU
rRNA, -tubulin, and polythreonine-rich gene probes were all kindly
provided by G. Widmer (Tufts University). The dihydrofolate reductase
gene probe was generated in this study. Standard protocols for the
manipulation of plasmids (2) were used throughout this study.
-32P]dATP (NEN Research
Products). Overnight hybridization was performed at 65°C, and the
stringency of the final posthybridization wash was 0.2× SSC at 65°C
(1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate). Records of the
hybridization signals were made by autoradiography. Longer exposure
times were required during autoradiography to detect weak signals from
certain samples.
Sequence analysis. PCR products were cloned into the pCRII-TOPO plasmid vector by using a TOPO cloning kit (Invitrogen). The nucleotide sequences of the clones were determined by the dideoxy chain termination method, and the PCR primers were trimmed from the final sequence. The sequences of both strands of the SSU and B-TUB PCR products were determined. Searches of the DNA databases were performed by using the BLAST server service (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/). Sequences were aligned by using the BLAST 2 tool (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/b12.html) and CLUSTALW (14) with default parameters; this analysis included using the identity matrix for scoring alignments and generating distances and using the neighbor-joining algorithm (32) for generating trees. Slightly negative branches were set to zero. Trees were displayed by using NJplot, as described by M. Guoy, University of Lyon, Lyon, France (ftp.epi.ac.uk/pub/software/mac/NJplot.sea.hqx). Because the simplest measurement of distance in which gaps are ignored was used, the distances in the tree for single sequences with large insertions, such as C. felis SSU rDNA (accession number AF112575), may have been underestimated.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The GenBank accession numbers for PCR products from fecal samples are as follows: AF297511 to AF297515 and AF297517 Cryptosporidium SSU rRNA gene sequences from white-tailed deer fecal samples 524, 563, 569, 570, 586, and 598, respectively; AF297502 to AF297507 for SSU rRNA gene sequences from muskrat fecal samples 589, 590, 591, 592, 593, and 603, respectively; AF297508 for SSU rRNA gene sequence from white-footed mouse fecal sample 4227; AF297509 and AF297510 for SSU rRNA gene sequences from chipmunk fecal samples 4237 and 4247, respectively; AF303051 and AF303052 for Cryptosporidium DHFR sequences from white-footed mouse fecal samples 4252 and 4227, respectively; AF303047, AF303049, and AF303050 for DHFR sequences from chipmunk fecal samples 4237, 4247, and 4234, respectively; AF303048 and AF303053 for DHFR sequences from muskrat fecal samples 591 and 603, respectively; AF303054 for Cryptosporidium POLY(T) sequences from chipmunk fecal sample 4237; AF303055 for POLY(T) sequence from muskrat fecal sample 603; and AF303056 for Cryptosporidium B-TUB sequence from muskrat fecal sample 603.
The accession numbers of the SSU rRNA gene reference sequences used in the alignments are as follows: AF093489 and AF093492 (46) for C. parvum genotype 1; AF093490 (46) and AF015772 (16) for C. parvum genotype 2 type A; AF308600 for C. parvum genotype 2 type B; AF093494 for C. parvum deer isolate; AF093495 for C. baileyi; AF093496 and AF093498 for C. muris; AF093499 and AF093500 (46) for C. serpentis; AF115377, AF112576, AF112570, AF112571, and AF112572 for C. parvum pig, dog, kangaroo, mouse, and ferret isolates, respectively; AF115378 for C. wrairi; AF112573 for Cryptosporidium sp.; AF112574 for C. meleagridis; and AF112575 (49) for C. felis. The accession numbers of the dihydrofolate reductase reference sequences are U41366 and U41365 for C. parvum genotype 1 and C. parvum genotype 2, respectively (39); the accession numbers of the-tubulin reference
sequences are AF115399 and AF115398 for C. parvum genotype 1 and C. parvum genotype 2, respectively (30);
and the accession number of the polythreonine-rich gene reference
sequence of C. parvum genotype 2 is U83169 (5).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
|
|---|
Diagnostic SSU PCR of wildlife samples.
Twenty-two
Cryptosporidium-positive wildlife samples were detected
among the 111 fecal samples tested by using the diagnostic SSU rDNA PCR
assay (Fig. 1; Table
2). Four additional wildlife fecal samples were scored
as provisionally positive samples (Table 2). Positive controls resulted
in strong gel bands and intense hybridization in all instances, and no
products were detected in lanes containing negative controls (Fig. 1;
data not shown). In general, the hybridization signal was consistent
with the intensity of the band visualized on a stained gel in the
expected size range, ~435 bp (Fig. 1). Southern analysis revealed
four positive samples that were not apparent from the stained gels. For
certain samples, amplification was inconsistent, reflecting variable
levels of target DNA and/or inhibiting substances in the template
preparations (e.g., chipmunk sample 4237 and deer sample 598) (Fig. 1).
Nonspecific gel bands outside the expected size range did not hybridize
with the SSU probe and could represent products from organisms other than Cryptosporidium spp. (Fig. 1).
|
|
Sequence analysis of SSU PCR products.
Fifteen SSU PCR
products from wildlife samples were sequenced; these products included
six products from deer samples, one product from mouse samples, two
products from chipmunk samples, and six products from muskrat samples
(Table 2). BLAST analysis of the GenBank databases indicated that the
most significant alignment for all of these sequences individually was
the alignment with Cryptosporidium SSU rDNA sequences.
Multiple sequence alignment with reference
Cryptosporidium SSU rDNA sequences showed that the
wildlife-derived SSU sequences were most similar to C. parvum sequences (Table 3; data not
shown). The distance relationships among the wildlife-derived SSU rDNA
sequences and the reference sequences are illustrated in Fig.
2.
|
|
DHFR, POLY(T), and B-TUB PCR products.
The 22 Cryptosporidium SSU-positive wildlife samples and four
provisionally positive wildlife samples were subjected to PCR amplification with three additional primer sets for multilocus analysis, DHFR, POLY(T), and B-TUB (Fig.
3; Tables 1 and 2). Positive controls
resulted in strong gel bands and intense hybridization in all
instances, and no products were detected in lanes containing negative
controls (Table 2; Fig. 3). There were 8, 6, and 13 positive PCR with
the DHFR, POLY(T), and B-TUB primers, respectively, among the 26 samples. Three wildlife fecal samples (mouse sample 4227, chipmunk
sample 4237, and muskrat sample 603) gave positive PCR products with
all three primer pairs; five wildlife fecal samples (one deer sample,
one skunk sample, two chipmunk samples, and one muskrat sample) were
positive with two primer pairs (Table 2). Six wildlife samples were
positive with one primer pair, and eight were negative for all three
primer pairs (Table 2). Many of the samples failed to amplify; this may
have been due to suboptimal reaction conditions or lower sensitivity
with these primers than with the SSU set. Two of the eight rodent fecal
samples (mouse sample 4252 and chipmunk sample 4244) that produced the expected DHFR product were samples that were scored as provisionally positive with the diagnostic SSU PCR assay, suggesting that they were
indeed positive (Fig. 3; Table 2).
|
Multilocus genotypic analysis. The eight DHFR-positive PCR products were obtained from rodent host species, and seven of these (two products from mouse samples, three products from chipmunk samples, and two products from muskrat samples) were cloned and sequenced (Table 2). Six of the sequences were identical to the DHFR sequence of C. parvum genotype 2, while the sequence from chipmunk sample 4234 differed from the genotype 2 sequence by three nucleotides (98% identical) (data not shown). The chipmunk sample 4234 sequence was more similar to the C. parvum genotype 2 sequence than to any of the other previously reported Cryptosporidium DHFR sequences (i.e., the sequences of genotype 1 and the mouse and marsupial DHFR genotypes) (22, 39), and therefore it was considered an allele of C. parvum genotype 2.
Two of the six positive POLY(T) PCR products were cloned and sequenced. The sequence from chipmunk sample 4237 was identical to the C. parvum genotype 2 reference sequence (5). The sequence from muskrat sample 603 was only 84% identical to the C. parvum genotype 2 sequence at the nucleotide level (data not shown). For a 143-bp segment of the POLY(T) product, 10 base pair differences were reported between the sequences of C. parvum genotypes 1 and 2 (44), whereas 24 differences were detected between the muskrat sample 603 and genotype 2 sequences. BLAST analysis of the nucleotide sequence from muskrat sample 603 showed significant alignment for the entire sequence only with the C. parvum sequence. However, in the absence of more extensive information on sequence heterogeneity among polythreonine-rich genes of Cryptosporidium species and strains, it is not possible to assign the mouse sample 603 POLY(T) allele to a genotype. Of the 13 B-TUB-positive PCR products, sequence information was limited to the product from muskrat sample 603. The sequence was 20 bp longer than expected, and the size discrepancy was due primarily to differences in the size of the intron. BLAST analysis showed that the most significant alignment with sequences in the GenBank database was the alignment with the C. parvum-tubulin gene, followed
by alignments with -tubulin sequences from other microorganisms. When it was compared to the C. parvum
genotype 1 and 2 reference sequences (30), the muskrat
sample 603 sequence had 86 and 89% identity, respectively, compared
with 98% identity between the sequences of the established genotypes.
There were 33 polymorphic nucleotides in the exon sequences of the
458-bp PCR product, but there was only one amino acid difference
between the muskrat sample 603 putative open reading frame and the
C. parvum reference sequences (data not shown). The muskrat
sample 603 B-TUB allele may have originated from an unknown organism, or it may be bona fide, perhaps reflecting a
Cryptosporidium species or strain difference.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
|
|---|
Molecular tools for detection and characterization of Cryptosporidium from wildlife fecal samples were successfully developed and applied in this study. These tools were used to obtain evidence of sylvatic C. parvum transmission cycles involving deer and other mammalian hosts in lower New York State, affirming the potential role of wildlife species as sources of Cryptosporidium in the catchments of public water supplies. The sylvatic cycles involve C. parvum genotype 2 strains, as well as two additional novel strains that closely resemble but are distinct from the established C. parvum genotypes in terms of their SSU rDNA alleles. With the exception of genotype 2, the previously reported genotypes have been closely associated with a single host species (24, 48), whereas in this study we detected a unique strain in four different mammalian hosts (deer, mouse, muskrat, and chipmunk).
The fecal samples in which Cryptosporidium DNA was detected were recovered from asymptomatic hosts (i.e., formed stools) and apparently were associated with relatively low levels of oocyst excretion. The extent to which oocysts present in wildlife feces enter water is not known. The survival and movement of oocysts in agricultural and sylvatic settings have received only limited study (41). In this regard, finding Cryptosporidium infections in muskrats may be of some significance as these animals are aquatic rodents that spend much of their time in water. There have been no previous reports of Cryptosporidium infection in either muskrats or skunks, except for a recent report of infection in muskrats in Poland (33). Also, the present study represents the first time that C. parvum isolates from chipmunks or muskrats have been characterized genetically.
Larger wild mammals, such as white-tailed deer, may provide a significant reservoir of infection because of the substantial quantity of droppings which they produce (37). In the present study 11% (10 of 91) of the deer samples tested were positive as determined by the diagnostic SSU PCR assay. Although this study was not designed to accurately characterize the prevalence of infection, one can appreciate the role that deer may play in terms of transmission among sylvatic mammals and water quality impact. Also, regardless of the prevalence or concentration of Cryptosporidium oocysts in wildlife species, it is clear that there is a contribution to the environmental load (37). Even in the complete absence of anthroponotic or agricultural sources, watersheds preserved in a pristine state may not be adequately protected in this regard.
Cryptosporidium infection was first reported in white-tailed deer in a captive herd in Georgia in a small sample of neonatal fawns and their mothers; most infections were asymptomatic (13). Recently, the first study of Cryptosporidium infection in wild white-tailed deer was described (29); the prevalence of infection was determined by microscopic methods. Among fawns (age, <6 months) at a wildlife center in Virginia, 9% (3 of 34 fawns) were infected. Deer that were 6 months to more than 7 years old were surveyed throughout Mississippi and were found to have an overall prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection of 5% (18 of 360 deer). From these data and our findings in New York, it appears that Cryptosporidium infection in white-tailed deer may be common and widespread.
Based on morphometric analysis, in the previous reports of infections in deer cryptosporidia were designated C. parvum (13, 29). In addition, for one of the captive deer isolates, the SSU rRNA gene sequence was identical to the C. parvum genotype 2 sequence (GenBank accession number AF093494). In the present study, the sequences from two of the positive fecal samples, one from a deer and one from a chipmunk, were also identical to C. parvum genotype 2 alleles in the amplified regions of the SSU rRNA gene; multilocus genotypic analysis of the chipmunk fecal sample provided further evidence that the identified sample contained C. parvum genotype 2 oocysts.
The relevance of the novel strains of C. parvum detected in the present study to human health is not clear. It is not known whether the C. parvum strains with SSU rRNA genotype 3 or 4 alleles are phenotypically equivalent to genotype 2 strains and whether they are capable of infecting a similar range of hosts. Interestingly, C. parvum genotype 4 SSU rDNA sequences were detected in fecal samples from four different mammalian hosts, suggesting that this genotype could have a broad host range. The novel strains were not detected in fecal samples from human cryptosporidiosis cases in New York City (unpublished data).
C. parvum genotypes 1 and 2 appear to account for the majority of cryptosporidiosis cases in humans (19; reviewed in reference 48). However, C. felis, C. meleagridis, and the C. parvum Dog genotype have been identified in human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons with diarrhea (23, 27). Thus, the risks from species or strains of Cryptosporidium that do not conform to C. parvum genotypes 1 and 2 may not be dismissed as irrelevant. Instead, the emergence of zoonotic strains in humans deserves close attention (38). There is a clear need to identify the factors responsible for human infectivity in C. parvum and to find correlative genetic markers that can be used to assess the phenotypes of sylvatic strains.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by an Environmental Protection Agency National Center for Environmental Research STAR graduate fellowship to J.F.P. and by the Columbia University Center for Environmental Research and Conservation.
The help of many persons was crucial to this study. Our thanks go to Bill Schuster and John Brady of Black Rock Forest, Tom Daniels (Fordham University), the New York City Department of Environmental Protection, Miguel Gelpi (Clinical Microbiology Service, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center), Giovanni Widmer (Tufts University), Richard Friedman (Columbia University Computing Facility), and Terri Wu.
| |
ADDENDUM IN PROOF |
|---|
The genotype 3 Cryptosporidium SSU rRNA gene sequence from white-tailed deer fecal sample 563 (accession no. AF297512) is identical to the W4 genotype sequence obtained from storm water samples in lower New York State (accession no. AF262328) reported by Xiao et al. (Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:5492-5498, 2000).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, 650 Fifth Avenue, 19th floor, New York, NY 10019. Phone: (212) 974-7105. Fax: (212) 974-7590. E-mail: sleblancq{at}ddcf.org.
J. F. Perz is currently affiliated with the Epidemic
Intelligence Service, Epidemiology Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga., on assignment to the Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
|
|---|
| 1. | Ashendorff, A., M. A. Princippe, A. Seeley, J. DaLuca, L. Beckhardt, W. J. Faber, and J. Mantus. 1997. Watershed protection for New York City's water supply. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 89:75-82. |
| 2. | Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl. 1995. Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
| 3. | Barnes, D. A., A. Bonnin, J. X. Huang, L. Gousset, J. Wu, J. Gut, P. Doyle, J. F. Dubremetz, H. Ward, and C. Petersen. 1998. A novel multi-domain mucin-like glycoprotein of Cryptosporidium parvum mediates invasion. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 96:93-110[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. | Caccio, S., G. La Rosa, and E. Pozio. 1997. The beta-tubulin gene of Cryptosporidium parvum. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 89:307-311[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. | Carraway, M., S. Tzipori, and G. Widmer. 1997. A new restriction fragment length polymorphism from Cryptosporidium parvum identifies genetically heterogeneous parasite populations and genotypic changes following transmission from bovine to human hosts. Infect. Immun. 65:3958-3960[Abstract]. |
| 6. |
Current, W. L., and L. S. Garcia.
1991.
Cryptosporidiosis.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
4:325-358 |
| 7. | Current, W. L., and N. C. Reese. 1986. A comparison of endogenous development of three isolates of Cryptosporidium in suckling mice. J. Protozool. 33:98-108[Medline]. |
| 8. |
Daniels, T. J.,
T. M. Boccia,
S. Varde,
J. Marcus,
J. Le,
D. J. Bucher,
R. C. Falco, and I. Schwartz.
1998.
Geographic risk for lyme disease and human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in southern New York state.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:4663-4669 |
| 9. | da Silva, A. J., F. J. Bornay-Llinares, A. del Aguila de la Puente C del, H. Moura, J. M. Peralta, I. Sobottka, D. A. Schwartz, G. S. Visvesvara, S. B. Slemenda, and N. J. Pieniazek. 1997. Diagnosis of Enterocytozoon bieneusi (microsporidia) infections by polymerase chain reaction in stool samples using primers based on the region coding for small-subunit ribosomal RNA. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 121:874-879[Medline]. |
| 10. | da Silva, A. J., F. J. Bornay-Llinares, I. N. Moura, S. B. Slemenda, J. L. Tuttle, and N. J. Pieniazek. 1999. Fast and reliable extraction of protozoan parasite DNA from fecal specimens. Mol. Diagn. 4:57-64[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. | Deng, M. Q., and D. O. Cliver. 1999. Improved immunofluorescence assay for detection of Giardia and Cryptosporidium from asymptomatic adult cervine animals. Parasitol. Res. 85:733-736[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. | Faubert, G. M., and Y. Litvinsky. 2000. Natural transmission of Cryptosporidium parvum between dams and calves on a dairy farm. J. Parasitol. 86:495-500[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. | Fayer, R., J. R. Fischer, C. T. Sewell, D. M. Kavanaugh, and D. A. Osborn. 1996. Spontaneous cryptosporidiosis in captive white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). J. Wildl. Dis. 32:619-622[Abstract]. |
| 14. | Higgins, D. G., J. D. Thompson, and T. J. Gibson. 1996. Using Clustal for multiple sequence alignments. Methods Enzymol. 266:383-402[Medline]. |
| 15. | Johnson, D. W., N. J. Pieniazek, D. W. Griffin, L. Misener, and J. B. Rose. 1995. Development of a PCR protocol for sensitive detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in water samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:3849-3855[Abstract]. |
| 16. | Le Blancq, S. M., N. V. Khramtsov, F. Zamani, S. J. Upton, and T. W. Wu. 1997. Ribosomal RNA gene organization in Cryptosporidium parvum. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 90:463-478[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. | LeChevallier, M. W., and W. D. Norton. 1992. Examining relationships between particle count and Giardia, Cryptosporidium and turbidity. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 84:54-60. |
| 18. | Leng, X., D. A. Mosier, and R. D. Oberst. 1996. Simplified method of recovery and PCR detection of Cryptosporidium DNA from bovine feces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:643-647[Abstract]. |
| 19. |
McLauchlin, J.,
C. Amar,
S. Pedraza-Diaz, and G. L. Nichols.
2000.
Molecular epidemiological analysis of Cryptosporidium spp. in the United Kingdom: results of genotyping Cryptosporidium spp. in 1,705 fecal samples from humans and 105 fecal samples from livestock animals.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:3984-3990 |
| 20. |
McLauchlin, J.,
S. Pedraza-Diaz,
C. Amar-Hoetzeneder, and G. L. Nichols.
1999.
Genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium strains from 218 patients with diarrhea diagnosed as having sporadic cryptosporidiosis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:3153-3158 |
| 21. |
Meinhardt, P. L.,
D. P. Casemore, and K. B. Miller.
1996.
Epidemiologic aspects of human cryptosporidiosis and the role of waterborne transmission.
Epidemiol. Rev.
18:118-136 |
| 22. | Morgan, U. M., P. T. Monis, R. Fayer, P. Deplazes, and R. C. A. Thompson. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among isolates of Cryptosporidium: evidence for several new species. J. Parasitol. 85:1126-1133[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 23. |
Morgan, U. M.,
R. Weber,
L. Xiao,
I. Sulaiman,
R. C. A. Thompson,
W. Ndiritu,
A. Lal,
A. Moore, and P. Deplazes.
2000.
Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium isolates obtained from human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals living in Switzerland, Kenya, and the United States.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:1180-1183 |
| 24. | Morgan, U. M., L. Xiao, R. Fayer, A. A. Lal, and R. C. Thompson. 1999. Variation in Cryptosporidium: towards a taxonomic revision of the genus. Int. J. Parasitol. 29:1733-1751[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. | O'Donoghue, P. J. 1995. Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis in man and animals. Int. J. Parasitol. 25:139-195[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. |
Ongerth, J. E., and H. H. Stibbs.
1987.
Identification of Cryptosporidium oocysts in river water.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
53:672-676 |
| 27. | Pieniazek, N. J., F. J. Bornay-Llinares, S. B. Slemenda, A. J. da Silva, I. N. Moura, M. J. Arrowood, O. Ditrich, and D. G. Addiss. 1999. New Cryptosporidium genotypes in HIV-infected persons. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5:444-449[Medline]. |
| 28. | Quy, R. J., D. P. Cowan, P. J. Haynes, A. P. Sturdee, R. M. Chalmers, A. T. Bodley-Tickell, and S. A. Bull. 1999. The Norway rat as a reservoir host of Cryptosporidium parvum. J. Wildl. Dis. 35:660-670[Abstract]. |
| 29. |
Rickard, L. G.,
C. Siefker,
C. R. Boyle, and E. J. Gentz.
1999.
The prevalence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia spp. in fecal samples from free-ranging white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the southeastern United States.
J. Vet. Diagn. Invest.
11:65-72 |
| 30. |
Rochelle, P. A.,
E. M. Jutras,
E. R. Atwill,
R. De Leon, and M. H. Stewart.
1999.
Polymorphisms in the -tubulin gene of Cryptosporidium parvum differentiate between isolates based on animal host but not geographic origin.
J. Parasitol.
85:986-989[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31. | Rose, J. B. 1997. Environmental ecology of Cryptosporidium and public health implications. Annu. Rev. Public Health 18:135-161[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 32. | Saitou, N., and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425[Abstract]. |
| 33. | Sinski, E., M. Bednarska, and A. Bajer. 1998. The role of wild rodents in ecology of cryptosporidiosis in Poland. Folia Parasitol. (Prague) 45:173-174. |
| 34. | Sischo, W. M., E. R. Atwill, L. E. Lanyon, and J. George. 2000. Cryptosporidia on dairy farms and the role these farms may have in contaminating surface water supplies in the northeastern United States. Prev. Vet. Med. 43:253-267[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 35. | Smith, H. V., and J. B. Rose. 1990. Waterborne cryptosporidiosis. Parasitol. Today 6:8-12[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 36. |
Spano, F.,
L. Putignani,
A. Crisanti,
P. Sallicandro,
U. M. Morgan,
S. M. Le Blancq,
L. Tchack,
S. Tzipori, and G. Widmer.
1998.
Multilocus genotypic analysis of Cryptosporidium parvum isolates from different hosts and geographical origins.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:3255-3259 |
| 37. | Sturdee, A. P., R. M. Chalmers, and S. A. Bull. 1999. Detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in wild animals of mainland Britain. Vet. Parasitol. 80:273-280[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 38. | Tzipori, S., and J. K. Griffiths. 1998. Natural history and biology of Cryptosporidium parvum. Adv. Parasitol. 40:5-36[Medline]. |
| 39. | Vasquez, J. R., L. Gooze, K. Kim, J. Gut, C. Petersen, and R. G. Nelson. 1996. Potential antifolate resistance determinants and genotypic variation in the bifunctional dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase gene from human and bovine isolates of Cryptosporidium parvum. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 79:153-165[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 40. | Wade, S. E., H. O. Mohammed, and S. L. Schaaf. 2000. Prevalence of Giardia sp., Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium muris (C. andersoni) in 109 dairy herds in five counties of southeastern New York. Vet. Parasitol. 93:1-11[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 41. | Walker, M. J., C. D. Montemagno, and M. B. Jenkins. 1998. Source water assessment and nonpoint sources of acutely toxic contaminants: a review of research related to survival and transport of Cryptosporidium parvum. Water Resour. Res. 34:3383-3392[CrossRef]. |
| 42. |
Weber, R.,
R. Bryan,
H. S. Bishop,
S. Wahlquist,
J. Sullivan, and D. Juranek.
1991.
Threshold of detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in human stool specimens: evidence for low sensitivity of current diagnostic methods.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:1323-1327 |
| 43. | Webster, J. P., and D. W. Macdonald. 1995. Parasites of wild brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) on UK farms. Parasitology 11:247-255. |
| 44. | Widmer, G. 1998. Genetic heterogeneity and PCR detection of Cryptosporidium parvum. Adv. Parasitol. 40:223-239[Medline]. |
| 45. |
Widmer, G.,
L. Tchack,
C. L. Chappell, and S. Tzipori.
1998.
Sequence polymorphism in the -tubulin gene reveals heterogeneous and variable population structures in Cryptosporidium parvum.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:4477-4481 |
| 45a. |
Xiao, L.,
K. Alderisio,
J. Limor,
M. Royer, and A. A. Lal.
2000.
Identification of species and sources of Cryptosporidium oocysts in storm waters with a small-subunit rRNA-based diagnostic and genotyping tool.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
66:5492-5498 |
| 46. |
Xiao, L.,
L. Escalante,
C. Yang,
I. Sulaiman,
A. A. Escalante,
R. J. Montali,
R. Fayer, and A. A. Lal.
1999.
Phylogenetic analysis of Cryptosporidium parasites based on the small-subunit rRNA gene locus.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:1578-1583 |
| 47. | Xiao, L., J. R. Limor, L. Li, U. Morgan, R. C. A. Thompson, and A. A. Lal. 1999. Presence of heterogeneous copies of the small subunit rRNA gene in Cryptosporidium parvum human and marsupial genotypes and Cryptosporidium felis. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 46:44S-45S[Medline]. |
| 48. | Xiao, L., U. M. Morgan, R. Fayer, R. C. A. Thompson, and A. A. Lal. 2000. Cryptosporidium systematics and implications for public health. Parasitol. Today 16:287-292[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 49. |
Xiao, L.,
U. M. Morgan,
J. Limor,
A. Escalante,
M. Arrowood,
W. Shulaw,
R. C. A. Thompson,
R. Fayer, and A. A. Lal.
1999.
Genetic diversity within Cryptosporidium parvum and related Cryptosporidium species.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:3386-3391 |
| 50. | Zhu, G., M. J. Marchewka, J. G. Ennis, and J. S. Keithly. 1998. Direct isolation of DNA from patient stools for polymerase chain reaction detection of Cryptosporidium parvum. J. Infect. Dis. 177:1443-1446[Medline]. |
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2001, p. 1154-1162, Vol. 67, No. 3
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.3.1154-1162.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Hill, N. J., Deane, E. M., Power, M. L.
(2008). Prevalence and Genetic Characterization of Cryptosporidium Isolates from Common Brushtail Possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) Adapted to Urban Settings. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 5549-5555
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Feng, Y., Alderisio, K. A., Yang, W., Blancero, L. A., Kuhne, W. G., Nadareski, C. A., Reid, M., Xiao, L.
(2007). Cryptosporidium Genotypes in Wildlife from a New York Watershed. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
73: 6475-6483
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Ziegler, P. E., Wade, S. E., Schaaf, S. L., Chang, Y.-F., Mohammed, H. O.
(2007). CRYPTOSPORIDIUM SPP. FROM SMALL MAMMALS IN THE NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED. J Wildl Dis
43: 586-596
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Ruecker, N. J., Braithwaite, S. L., Topp, E., Edge, T., Lapen, D. R., Wilkes, G., Robertson, W., Medeiros, D., Sensen, C. W., Neumann, N. F.
(2007). Tracking Host Sources of Cryptosporidium spp. in Raw Water for Improved Health Risk Assessment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
73: 3945-3957
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Feltus, D. C., Giddings, C. W., Schneck, B. L., Monson, T., Warshauer, D., McEvoy, J. M.
(2006). Evidence Supporting Zoonotic Transmission of Cryptosporidium spp. in Wisconsin. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 4303-4308
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Leoni, F., Amar, C., Nichols, G., Pedraza-Diaz, S., McLauchlin, J.
(2006). Genetic analysis of Cryptosporidium from 2414 humans with diarrhoea in England between 1985 and 2000. J Med Microbiol
55: 703-707
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Power, M. L., Sangster, N. C., Slade, M. B., Veal, D. A.
(2005). Patterns of Cryptosporidium Oocyst Shedding by Eastern Grey Kangaroos Inhabiting an Australian Watershed. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 6159-6164
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Jiang, J., Alderisio, K. A., Xiao, L.
(2005). Distribution of Cryptosporidium Genotypes in Storm Event Water Samples from Three Watersheds in New York. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 4446-4454
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Wang, Z., Vora, G. J., Stenger, D. A.
(2004). Detection and Genotyping of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, Giardia lamblia, and Cryptosporidium parvum by Oligonucleotide Microarray. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 3262-3271
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Jellison, K. L., Distel, D. L., Hemond, H. F., Schauer, D. B.
(2004). Phylogenetic Analysis of the Hypervariable Region of the 18S rRNA Gene of Cryptosporidium Oocysts in Feces of Canada Geese (Branta canadensis): Evidence for Five Novel Genotypes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
70: 452-458
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Ryan, U., Xiao, L., Read, C., Zhou, L., Lal, A. A., Pavlasek, I.
(2003). Identification of Novel Cryptosporidium Genotypes from the Czech Republic. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 4302-4307
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Dalle, F., Roz, P., Dautin, G., Di-Palma, M., Kohli, E., Sire-Bidault, C., Fleischmann, M. G., Gallay, A., Carbonel, S., Bon, F., Tillier, C., Beaudeau, P., Bonnin, A.
(2003). Molecular Characterization of Isolates of Waterborne Cryptosporidium spp. Collected during an Outbreak of Gastroenteritis in South Burgundy, France. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 2690-2693
[Abstract] [Full Text]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»