 |
INTRODUCTION |
Streptomyces spp. are
soil bacteria and main decomposers of chitin, the second most abundant
polysaccharide in nature, in soil. Since streptomycetes use chitin as
carbon and nitrogen sources, they are assumed to play a major part in
the turnover of chitin in natural ecosystems. A number of chitinases
have been characterized from various Streptomyces spp.
(1, 2, 7, 10, 20, 27, 29). Several genes encoding
chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14) that hydrolyze chitin have been cloned from
Streptomyces spp. (2, 3, 6, 15, 16, 19-21,
28). The deduced proteins belong to family 18 or 19 of glycosyl
hydrolases (3, 19).
The chitin-binding proteins CHB1 and CHB2 lacking hydrolytic activity
have been found in Streptomyces olivaceoviridis and Streptomyces reticuli, respectively (11, 25).
These proteins specifically bind to
-chitin but not to
-chitin,
chitosan, or cellulose. The CBP21 protein produced by a gram-negative,
chitin-degrading bacterium, Serratia marcescens
(26), shares 45% identical amino acids with CHB1.
We previously found one open reading frame upstream of the
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) chitinase gene
chiG. Its deduced product (21) shares 37%
identical amino acids with the previously described chitin-binding
protein CHB1 (25). In this report we describe the
biochemical characteristics of the protein and give some insights into
the regulation of the corresponding gene.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and selection of transformants.
Escherichia coli DH5
(23) was used as host
for constructs derived from the vector pUC18 (31) or the
bifunctional Escherichia coli-Streptomyces vector pWHM3
(30). E. coli DH5
transformants carrying
pUC18 or pWHM3 constructs were selected on Luria-Bertani medium agar
plates containing ampicillin (50 µg/ml).
TK21, a plasmid-less derivative from Streptomyces lividans
66 (9), served as the host for the pWHM3-based construct
(named pWF17) carrying the chb3 gene. Protoplasts from
S. lividans TK21 were transformed as described elsewhere
(9). Regenerated transformants containing pWHM3-based
constructs were selected on complete medium containing thiostrepton (25 µg/ml).
Recombinant DNA techniques and transformations.
Digestions
by restriction enzymes were performed as described earlier
(23) and according to the suppliers' instructions. Dephosphorylation, blunting, or ligation of DNA fragments was done
using bacterial alkaline phosphatase, a DNA blunting kit, or a DNA
ligation kit, respectively, according to the manufacturers' instructions. Transformations of E. coli and S. lividans were performed as described previously (9,
23). Bacterial alkaline phosphatase for DNA manipulation was
bought from Toyobo, Tokyo, Japan. A DNA blunting kit and a DNA ligation
kit were obtained from Takara, Tokyo, Japan. Restriction enzymes were
supplied by Gibco-BRL and Roche Diagnostics.
Culture conditions.
A total of 100 ml of complete medium
(2.0% [wt/vol] tryptic soy broth, 0.5% [wt/vol] yeast extract,
and 50 mM MgCl2; pH 7.6) was inoculated with spores of
Streptomyces strains and cultivated at 30°C with shaking
at 130 rpm for 20 h. The mycelia were then harvested by
centrifugation, washed with minimal medium {MM; 1.5 g of
KH2PO4, 2.0 g of
K2HPO4, 1.4 g of
(NH4)2SO4, 0.01 g of
CaCl2, 0.1 g of MgSO4, and 1 ml of trace
element solution [40 mg of ZnCl2, 200 mg of
FeCl3 · 6H2O, 100 mg of
CuSO4 · 2H2O, 100 mg of
MnCl2 · 4H2O, 100 mg of
Na2B4O7 · 10H2O,
and 100 mg of
(NH4)6Mo7O24 · 4H2O] per liter; pH 7.2}, resuspended in MM, and divided
into several aliquots. Then, a 0.75% (wt/vol) solution of each desired soluble carbon source was added to the suspension, and cultivation was
continued for up to 24 h. Prewashed mycelia were grown in the
presence of chitin (1% crab shells [Sigma], ground to powder) for up
to 72 h. All cultivations were done in the presence of thiostrepton (25 µg/ml).
Protein purification.
The spores of S. lividans
TK21 harboring pWF17 were inoculated into 300 ml of complete medium
(see above) supplemented with 25 µg of thiostrepton per ml in a
1-liter flask with indentations and cultivated at 30°C with shaking
at 130 rpm. After 20 h, three portions of 100 ml were diluted with
the same medium to 1 liter, and cultivation (in 2-liter flasks) was
continued for another 15 h. The mycelia were harvested by
centrifugation, washed five times with MM (without supplements),
resuspended in the same volume of the MM supplemented with 0.75%
(wt/vol) glucose and 25 µg of of thiostrepton per ml, and cultivated
for 20 h. The proteins in the culture supernatant were thereafter
precipitated [(NH4)2SO4, 90%
saturation] and loaded onto a DEAE-Sepharose column
(Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech). The CHB3 protein was eluted in 20 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) containing 0.15 M NaCl. Fractions cross-reacting with
anti-CHB1 antibodies (25) were applied onto a
Phenyl-Sepharose column (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech), and elution of
proteins was done in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) with a continuously
decreasing concentration of
(NH4)2SO4 from 1.2 to 0 M. The
fractions containing the desired protein were immunodetected and
rechromatographed using gel filtration.
Analyses of proteins.
Proteins were separated with 15%
polyacrylamide gels containing 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)
(12). Western blot hybridization was performed using
anti-CHB1 antibodies (11, 25). To determine the
amino-terminal amino acids, the protein was blotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Immobilon-P; Millipore), as described elsewhere (24). The amino-terminal amino acids
of the protein were determined by Edman degradation using an LF3000 automated protein sequencer (Beckman).
Binding assay.
Binding of the CHB3 protein to various
polysaccharides was performed as outlined previously (32)
with some modifications. For binding tests, highly purified cellulose
(Avicel; Serva), glucan (from yeast [Sigma]),
-chitin (from crab
shells [Sigma]), and chitosan (derived from crab shells,
deacetylation of ca. 85%; Sigma) were used.
-Chitin from squid pen
and
-chitin from hen lobster tendon were kindly provided by H. Chanzy, Grenoble, France. Chitin from crab shells (practical grade;
Sigma) was used for the preparation of colloidal chitin
(13). Then, 1 µg of the apparently homogeneous protein
in 70 µl of the indicated buffer was added to 3 mg of
-chitin,
-chitin, colloidal chitin, chitosan, Avicel, or glucan; equilibrated
with 2.0 ml of the corresponding buffer; and kept overnight at room
temperature. We used 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0 and 8.0), bis-Tris-HCl (pH
6.0), or 100 mM acetic acid (adjusted with NaOH to pH 5.0) as reaction
buffer. After centrifugation, the pellets were washed twice with 1 ml
of the corresponding buffer, suspended in 70 µl of the buffer
containing 1 M NaCl, and shaken for 20 min at room temperature. The
pellets were washed twice with 1 ml of the indicated buffer and
resuspended in 70 µl of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0). To each sample (30 µl), 10 µl of buffer (40% [vol/vol] glycerol, 20% [vol/vol]
-mercaptoethanol, 250 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 8% [wt/vol] SDS,
and 0.1% [wt/vol] bromophenol blue) was added; the mixtures were
boiled for 10 min and then subjected to SDS-15% polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (PAGE). After transfer to a Fluorotrans Transfer
membrane (Pall), the ratio of bound and unbound CHB3 protein was
immunologically detected using anti-CHB1 antibodies (25).
Primer extension.
The mycelia of S. lividans TK21
transformants frozen at
80°C were disrupted by grinding with
alumina Type A-5 (Sigma) and a pellet mixer (Treff Lab). Subsequently,
total RNAs were prepared using an RNeasy Mini Preparation Kit (Qiagen)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. The oligonucleotide
5'-ATCAGGGCAGAGGTCTTCCGACGTG-3', the 5' end of which was
labeled with the fluorescent dye fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), was
utilized as a primer. Then, 12 µg of total RNA and 1 pmol of the
primer were denatured at 90°C for 1 min and annealed at 60°C for 2 min in 26 µl of the buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0; 100 mM KCl).
Reverse transcription was done at 42°C for 1 h with ReverTra Ace
RNaseH
Reverse Transcriptase (Toyobo) and with dATP,
dCTP, dTTP, and 7-deaza-dGTP (Roche Diagnostics). Size ladders were
produced by a dideoxy sequencing reaction of the plasmid pCG101
(21) with the primer. The sequencing reaction was
performed using a Thermo-Sequenase fluorescence-labeled primer cycling
kit with 7-deaza-dGTP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. The primer extension products and the
size ladders were separated on a 4.0% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gel
containing 10% (vol/vol) formamide at 40°C by an automated DSQ-2000L
laser fluorescent sequencer (Shimadzu).
 |
RESULTS |
Physiological and transcriptional studies.
pCG101
(21) was digested with NotI and
SacI, blunted, and self-ligated in order to remove the
fragment containing the major part of chiG (Fig.
1). The
EcoRI-HindIII fragment of the resulting plasmid was inserted into the corresponding sites of pWHM3 to obtain
pWF17 (Fig. 1). S. lividans TK21 was transformed with pWF17 or the control vector pWHM3. Several transformants carried the correct
constructs, as confirmed by restriction enzyme analysis.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Characteristics of constructs. The relative orientations
of the chb3 gene, the chitinase (chiG) gene, and
a portion of an open reading frame encoding a so-far-unknown protein
are shown (top). The relevant restriction sites are indicated for the
construct pCG101 (using the vector pUC18) and for the construct pWF17
(using the vector pWHM3).
|
|
Precultivated mycelia from S. lividans TK21 carrying pWF17
or the control vector pWHM3 were grown in MM supplemented with glucose,
N-acetylglucosamine, yeast extract, or chitin. After concentration, the proteins with the supernatants were tested as to
their cross-reactivity with anti-CHB1 antibodies (see Materials and
Methods) raised against the previously described chitin-binding protein
CHB1 from S. olivaceoviridis (25). About equal
amounts of a protein with an apparent molecular mass of ca. 15 to 16 kDa were secreted by S. lividans pWF17 in the presence of
each of the carbon sources indicated above. The control strain S. lividans TK21(pWHM3) containing only the vector did not produce
the 15- to 16-kDa protein.
To determine the transcriptional start sites of chb3, primer
extension analysis was performed using the total RNAs from S. lividans TK21(pWF17) and the control TK21 strain carrying only the
vector pWHM3. The extended products of the same size were detected in
S. lividans TK21(pWF17) grown in the presence of chitin, N-acetylglucosamine, or glucose, whereas no product was
detected in TK21(pWHM3) (Fig. 2). The
dominant extension product corresponded to the A residue at position
188 upstream of the putative translation initiation site. At about 10 and 35 nucleotides upstream of the transcriptional starting site, a
sequence matching the consensus of promoters could be recognized by
major sigma factors. A motif of 12 bp overlapping the
10 hexamer of
the promoter is directly repeated (Fig. 2).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Determination of transcriptional initiation sites of the
chb3 gene. The S. lividans control strain TK21
containing the vector pWHM3 (lanes 1, 3, and 5) and TK21 carrying the
construct pWF17 (lanes 2, 4, and 6) were precultured in complete
medium. Cultivation of washed mycelia was then continued in MM
supplemented with 0.75% (wt/vol) chitin (lanes 1 and 2),
N-acetylglucosamine (lanes 3 and 4), or glucose (lanes 5 and
6). To maintain selection for the plasmid, thiostrepton (25 µg/ml)
was added. Primer extension analyses were done as outlined in Materials
and Methods. Lanes 7 through 10 show A-, G-, C-, and T-specific dideoxy
sequencing reactions, respectively. The corresponding sequences of the
coding strands are shown on the right. The nucleotides of
transcriptional starts and the 10 and 35 regions of the promoter
consensus sequences are indicated. The sequences similar to the 12-bp
direct repeat directing the regulation of the S. plicatus
chi63 gene (5, 18) are underlined.
|
|
Purification of the protein.
To obtain larger quantities of
well-grown mycelia, S. lividans TK21(pWF17) was
precultivated in complete medium. After a washing, cultivation was
continued in MM supplemented with glucose. The proteins (20 mg/2
liters) from the cleared supernatant were precipitated by
(NH4)2SO4. After we tested a number
of conditions, we found it best to purify the protein by subsequent
chromatographies using DEAE, phenyl-Sepharose, and gel filtration (for
details see Materials and Methods). The purified protein (35 µg/2
liters) cross-reacted moderately with anti-CHB1 antibodies (Fig.
3). Its amino-terminal amino acid
sequence (HGYISDPPRSQAQ) was determined by Edman
degradation, and it corresponded to that of the protein (deduced from
DNA sequence data) lacking the signal peptide, the size of which as
calculated from the deduced amino acid sequence is 14,964 Da. This
protein was designated CHB3.

View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Purification of CHB3. S. lividans TK21(pWF17)
was grown in the presence of glucose. The proteins from the culture
filtrate (lane 1) and the highly purified CHB3 protein (lane 2) were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The purified CHB3 protein was also tested for
cross-reactions with anti-CHB1 antibodies (lane 3). Size markers
are given (in kilodaltons).
|
|
Binding specificity of CHB3.
The pI of CHB3 as calculated from
its deduced amino acid sequence is 4.58, while those of CHB1 and CHB2
are 8.23 and 8.90, respectively. This suggested that the optimum pH for
the binding of CHB3 to chitin is different from those of CHB1 and CHB2.
The ability of CHB3 to bind to
-chitin was therefore investigated at
pH 5, 6, 7, and 8. At pH 6, all of the added protein bound to
-chitin, part of it at pH 5 and 7 and only a little at pH 8 (Fig.
4), pH 6 thus being the optimum value for
efficient targeting of
-chitin. Most of the bound protein could be
eluted in the same buffer containing 1 M NaCl (Table
1), indicating that the protein is
relatively loosely bound.

View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Binding efficiency of CHB3 in dependence on the pH. As
described in Materials and Methods, CHB3 was incubated with ground crab
shell powder ( -chitin) at room temperature overnight in buffers
adjusted to pH 5 (lanes 1 and 5), pH 6 (lanes 2 and 6), pH 7 (lanes 3 and 7), and pH 8 (lanes 4 and 8). After centrifugation, the
supernatants were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (lanes 1 to 4). The pellets were
washed with the corresponding buffer, resuspended, boiled in the
SDS-PAGE sample buffer for 10 min, and centrifuged. The supernatant was
subjected to gel electrophoresis (lanes 5 to 8). CHB3 was detected by
immunoblotting with anti-CHB1 antibodies, and the relative quantities
were determined by scanning. The highest amount of cross-reacting
protein was set as 100%. The sizes of the protein markers are
indicated.
|
|
To investigate the binding specificity of CHB3, binding tests were
performed at pH 6 using several other polysaccharides (Table 1). The
ability to bind to
-chitin was comparable to that of
-chitin.
CHB3 bound most strongly to
-chitin from hen lobster tendon, and
only about half of it could be removed by 1 M NaCl. CHB3 also bound to
chitosan but eluted in the buffer with 1 M NaCl. Its ability to bind to
colloidal chitin was lower than that of the four substrates described
above. Binding of CHB3 to Avicel and glucan (from yeast) was not detected.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Having cloned the corresponding S. coelicolor A3(2)
gene, we generated an S. lividans transformant secreting the
CHB3 protein (14.9 kDa). We have demonstrated here that the purified
CHB3 from S. coelicolor A3(2) binds to both
-chitin and
-chitin, but relatively loosely; furthermore, it binds to chitosan
in a low salt concentration. The deduced CHB3 protein shares 37, 37, and 36% identical amino acids with the deduced proteins CHB1
(25), CHB2 (11), and CBP21 (26), respectively.
The Streptomyces proteins CHB1 (S. olivaceoviridis) and CHB2 (S. reticuli) share five
tryptophan residues in corresponding positions. Substitution of
tryptophan Trp-57 by tyrosine (Tyr) or leucine (Leu) in CHB1 resulted
in a mutant protein whose binding to crab shell chitin (
-chitin) was
reduced to ca. 10% in the presence of 1 M NaCl compared to the
wild-type protein (33). Under the same conditions,
interaction of CHB3 with the same substrate was about threefold less
pronounced than the binding of the W57L CHB1 mutant protein (exchange
of the tryptophan residue [Trp, W] by a lysine residue). CHB3
contains three Trp residues in positions corresponding to those in CHB1
and CHB2; however, it lacks a Trp residue corresponding to the one in
position 57. Considering, in addition, the data gathered about the W57L
mutant CHB1 (33), the findings indicate that to some
extent the differences are due to the lack of this Trp residue. A
region that corresponds to the one including Trp-134 in CHB1 is also
absent in CHB3. This region of CHB1 contributes to its interaction with
-chitin (33).
Unlike CHB1 and CHB2, CHB3 bound to
-chitin (Table 1), a feature
shared with CBP21 from S. marcescens, which predominantly interacts with
-chitin (26). CHB3 shares 10 identical
amino acids with CBP21 that are not present in CHB1 and CHB2, and 5 of
them are gathered around position 130 in CHB3 (Fig.
5). It will thus be interesting to
determine whether this region is essential for the specific interaction
with
-chitin.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Alignment of deduced amino acid sequences of CHB3 from
S. coelicolor A3(2), CHB1 from S. olivaceoviridis
(25), CHB2 from S. reticuli (11),
and CBP21 from S. marcescens (26). Amino acids
which are identical between CHB3 and any of the other three proteins
are given in white against a black background. The black arrow
indicates the predicted cleavage site of a signal peptidase. The
cleavage site could be predicted because the N termini of the mature
CHB3 (see Results) and of CHB1, CHB2, and CBP21 had been determined
previously (11, 25, 26). Tryptophan residues (W) which are
shared with CHB1 and CHB2 are indicated by a heavy dot; those which are
exchanged by tyrosine in CHB3 are marked by an asterisk.
|
|
Several Streptomyces chitinase genes, i.e., chi63
of S. plicatus (5); chiA and
chiC of S. lividans (6, 14);
exo-chiO1 of S. olivaceoviridis (3);
chiA, chiB, chiC, chiD, and chiF of S. coelicolor A3(2) (22); and chb1 of
S. olivaceoviridis (25), are transcribed in the
presence of chitin but seem to be repressed in the presence of glucose.
The upstream regions of all these chitinase genes and of the
Streptomyces chitin-binding genes chb1, chb2, and
chb3 contain one (exo-chiO1) or two repeats of a
12-bp repeat, which vary from one another to different degrees. In this
context, it is interesting that the first nucleotide T of the direct
repeat is substituted by C only within the chb3 gene (Fig.
6). Whether this exchange leads to
cessation of binding of a repressor protein implicated to interact with
the 12-bp repeat upstream of the S. plicatus chi63 gene
(18) remains to be elucidated.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Alignment of upstream regions of chitinase genes and the
genes for chitin-binding proteins. The experimentally determined
transcriptional start sites are wavy underlined. The predicted 35 and
10 sequences for the RNA polymerase binding sites are double and
single underlined, respectively. The sequences corresponding to the
12-bp direct repeat of the S. plicatus chi63 gene
(5) are given in capitals; those identical with the direct
repeat of the chi63 gene are shown in white on a black
background. The strains have been abbreviated as follows:
(c), S. coelicolor A3(2); (p),
S. plicatus; (l), S. lividans;
(o), S. olivaceoviridis.
|
|
It is interesting that the Bacillus circulans chitinase A1
comprises a small domain (45 amino acids) targeting various forms of
insoluble chitin at a wide pH range (8). The 12-kDa
N-terminal domain of the exoChiO1 chitinase from S. olivaceoviridis recognizes
- and
-chitin (3).
The AKWWTQG of the binding domains of the B. circulans chitinase A1 and some other deduced chitinases is
assumed to be required for the recognition of chitin. A similar motif
is absent in the biochemically characterized binding domain of the
exoChiO1 chitinase and in the CHB1, CHB2, and CHB3 proteins from
streptomycetes. CHB3 also differs from the recently identified small
(9.8-kDa) AFP1 protein from Streptomyces tendae interacting with chitin and chitosan (4).
Native chitin varies as to the length and arrangement of its chains and
as to its accessory organic and inorganic compounds. Chitosan shows
different degrees of deacetylation (17). Chitin and
chitosan can be encountered separately or together (i.e., in certain
fungal cell walls), as well in association with other polysaccharides
(e.g., glucan). The studies performed up to now have shown that the
recognition properties of the individual chitin-binding proteins and of
the binding domains of chitinases considerably differ.
Representing a large population in soil, several
Streptomyces strains, depending on the type of binding
protein, have a selective advantage in colonizing different types of
chitin-containing substrates which they then degrade, due to their
large repertoire of chitinases.
A.S. thanks the members of the study group of Applied Genetics of
Microorganisms at the University of Osnabrück, D. Müller for support in subcloning, and A. Be
irevi
and D. Ortiz de Orué Lucana for advice on the fast-performance liquid
chromatography system, the performance of binding tests, and
transformations. We are grateful to M. Lemme for her help with the
writing of the manuscript.
This work was supported by a grant of the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (Schr. 203/6-3) to H.S., by a short-term
fellowship awarded to A.S. by the DAAD (Deutscher Akademischer
Auslandsdienst), and by the Grant-in-Aid Design Program from the MAFF
(Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan)
(BDP-00-VI-2-6) to K.M.
| 1.
|
Beyer, M., and H. Diekmann.
1985.
The chitinase system of Streptomyces sp. ATCC 11238 and its significance for fungal cell wall degradation.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
23:140-146.
|
| 2.
|
Blaak, H.,
J. Schnellmann,
S. Walter,
B. Henrissat, and H. Schrempf.
1993.
Characteristics of an exochitinase from Streptomyces olivaceoviridis, its corresponding gene, putative protein domains and relationship to other chitinases.
Eur. J. Biochem.
214:659-669[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Blaak, H., and H. Schrempf.
1995.
Binding and substrate specificities of a Streptomyces olivaceoviridis chitinase in comparison with its proteolytically processed form.
Eur. J. Biochem.
229:132-139[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bormann, C.,
D. Baier,
I. Hörr,
C. Raps,
J. Berger,
G. Jung, and H. Schwarz.
1999.
Characterization of a novel, antifungal, chitin-binding protein from Streptomyces tendae Tü901 that interferes with growth polarity.
J. Bacteriol.
181:7421-7429[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Delic, I.,
P. Robbins, and J. Westpheling.
1992.
Direct repeat sequences are implicated in the regulation of two Streptomyces chitinase promoters that are subject to carbon catabolite control.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:1885-1889[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Fujii, T., and K. Miyashita.
1993.
Multiple domain structure in a chitinase gene (chiC) of Streptomyces lividans.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
139:677-686[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Hara, S.,
Y. Yamamura,
Y. Fujii,
T. Mega, and T. Ikenada.
1989.
Purification and characterization of chitinase produced by Streptomyces erythraeus.
J. Biochem.
105:484-489[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Hashimoto, M.,
T. Ikegami,
S. Seino,
N. Ohuchi,
H. Fukada,
J. Sugiyama,
M. Shirakawa, and T. Watanabe.
2000.
Expression and characterization of the chitin-binding domain of chitinase A1 from Bacillus circulans WL-12.
J. Bacteriol.
182:3045-3054[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Hopwood, D. A.,
M. J. Bibb,
K. F. Chater,
T. Kieser,
C. J. Bruton,
H. M. Kieser,
D. J. Lydiate,
C. P. Smith,
J. M. Ward, and H. Schrempf.
1985.
Genetic manipulation of Streptomyces: a laboratory manual.
John Innes Foundation, Norwich, England.
|
| 10.
|
Jeuniaux, C.
1966.
Chitinases.
Methods Enzymol.
8:644-650.
|
| 11.
|
Kolbe, S.,
S. Fischer,
A. Becirevic,
P. Hinz, and H. Schrempf.
1998.
The Streptomyces reticuli -chitin-binding protein CHB2 and its gene.
Microbiology
144:1291-1297[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
1970.
Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.
Nature
227:680-685[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Lingappa, Y., and J. L. Lockwood.
1962.
Chitin media for selective isolation and culture of actinomycetes.
Phytopathology
52:317-323.
|
| 14.
|
Miyashita, K., and T. Fujii.
1993.
Nucleotide sequence and analysis of a gene (chiA) for a chitinase from Streptomyces lividans 66.
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.
57:1691-1698[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Miyashita, K.,
T. Fujii, and Y. Sawada.
1991.
Molecular cloning and characterization of chitinase genes from Streptomyces lividans 66.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
137:2065-2072.
|
| 16.
|
Miyashita, K.,
T. Fujii,
A. Watanabe, and H. Ueno.
1997.
Nucleotide sequence and expression of a gene (chiB) for a chitinase from Streptomyces lividans.
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
83:26-31[CrossRef].
|
| 17.
|
Muzzarelli, R. A. A.
1977.
Chitin.
Pergamon Press, Oxford, England.
|
| 18.
|
Ni, X., and J. Westpheling.
1997.
Direct repeat sequences in the Streptomyces chitinase-63 promoter direct both glucose repression and chitin induction.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:13116-13121[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Ohno, T.,
S. Armand,
T. Hata,
N. Nikaidou,
B. Henrissat,
M. Mitsutomi, and T. Watanabe.
1996.
A modular family 19 chitinase found in the prokaryotic organism Streptomyces griseus HUT 6037.
J. Bacteriol.
178:5065-5070[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Robbins, P. W.,
C. Albright, and B. Benfield.
1988.
Cloning and expression of a Streptomyces plicatus chitinase (chitinase-63) in Escherichia coli.
J. Biol. Chem.
263:443-447[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Saito, A.,
T. Fujii,
T. Yoneyama,
M. Redenbach,
T. Ohno,
T. Watanabe, and K. Miyashita.
1999.
High-multiplicity of chitinase genes in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2).
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.
63:710-718[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Saito, A.,
M. Ishizaka,
P. B. Francisco, Jr.,
T. Fujii, and K. Miyashita.
2000.
Transcriptional co-regulation of the five chitinase genes scattered on the Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) chromosome.
Microbiology
146:2937-2946[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 24.
|
Schlochtermeier, A.,
S. Walter,
J. Schröder,
M. Moormann, and H. Schrempf.
1992.
The gene encoding the cellulase (Avicelase) Cel1 from Streptomyces reticuli and analysis of protein domains.
Mol. Microbiol.
6:3611-3621[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Schnellmann, J.,
A. Zeltins,
H. Blaak, and H. Schrempf.
1994.
The novel lectin-like protein CHB1 is encoded by a chitin-inducible Streptomyces olivaceoviridis gene and binds specifically to crystalline -chitin of fungi and other organisms.
Mol. Microbiol.
13:807-819[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Suzuki, K.,
M. Suzuki,
M. Taiyoji,
N. Nikaidou, and T. Watanabe.
1998.
Chitin binding protein (CBP21) in the culture supernatant of Serratia marcescens 2170.
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.
62:128-135[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Tarentino, A. L., and F. Maley.
1974.
Purification and properties of an endo- -N-acetylglucosaminidase from Streptomyces griseus.
J. Biol. Chem.
249:811-817[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Tsujibo, H.,
N. Hatano,
H. Endo,
K. Miyamoto, and Y. Inamori.
2000.
Purification and characterization of a thermostable chitinase from Streptomyces thermoviolaceus OPC-520 and cloning of the encoding gene.
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.
64:96-102[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Ueno, H.,
K. Miyashita,
Y. Sawada, and Y. Oba.
1990.
Purification and some properties of extracellular chitinases from Streptomyces sp. S-84.
J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol.
36:377-392.
|
| 30.
|
Vara, J.,
M. Lewandowska-Skarbek,
Y.-G. Wang,
S. Donadio, and C. R. Hutchinson.
1989.
Cloning of genes governing the deoxysugar portion of the erythromycin biosynthesis pathway in Saccharopolyspora erythraea (Streptomyces erythreus).
J. Bacteriol.
171:5872-5881[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Yanisch-Perron, C.,
J. Vieira, and J. Messing.
1985.
Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors.
Gene
33:103-119[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Zeltins, A., and H. Schrempf.
1995.
Visualization of -chitin with a specific chitin-binding protein (CHB1) from Streptomyces olivaceoviridis.
Anal. Biochem.
231:287-294[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Zeltins, A., and H. Schrempf.
1997.
Specific interaction of the Streptomyces chitin-binding protein CHB1 with -chitin: the role of individual tryptophan residues.
Eur. J. Biochem.
246:557-564[Medline].
|