Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2001, p. 1956-1958, Vol. 67, No. 4
Department of Entomology, University of
California, Riverside, California 92521,1
and Bacteries et Champignons Entomopathogènes,
Institut Pasteur, Paris, France2
Received 25 September 2000/Accepted 12 January 2001
Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes with high levels of
resistance to single or multiple toxins from Bacillus
thuringiensis subsp. israelensis were tested for
cross-resistance to the Bacillus thuringiensis subsp.
jegathesan polypeptide Cry19A. No cross-resistance was
detected in mosquitoes that had been selected with the Cry11A, Cry4A
and Cry4B, or Cry4A, Cry4B, Cry11A, and CytA toxins. A low but
statistically significant level of cross-resistance, three to
fourfold, was detected in the colony selected with Cry4A, Cry4B, and
Cry11A. This cross-resistance was similar to that previously detected with B. thuringiensis subsp.
jegathesan in the same colony. These data help explain the
toxicity of B. thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan against the resistant colonies and indicate that
the Cry19A polypeptide might be useful in managing resistance and/or as
a component of synthetic combinations of mosquitocidal toxins.
Commercial products for the
biological control of mosquitoes are based upon two entomopathogenic
bacterial species, Bacillus thuringiensis subsp.
israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus.
Products derived from these two bacteria are used worldwide to control mosquito and blackfly larvae. Because few alternative materials are
available, insecticide resistance would seriously limit the usefulness
of these two products. In fact, field resistance to B. sphaericus has recently been reported in Culex
pipiens complex in France (12), India
(8), Brazil (11), and China
(17). To date there are no reported cases of field
resistance to B. thuringiensis subsp.
israelensis. However, laboratory selections using cloned
B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis
toxins have shown that resistance can develop and is inversely
correlated with the number of toxins used in the selection
(3).
The use of alternative bacterial strains is one approach to managing
resistance to bacterial insecticides. Although there are other
mosquitocidal strains of B. thuringiensis and
B. sphaericus, most lack the high activity of
B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis (7, 13). Additionally, synthetic combinations of
mosquitocidal toxins from different microbial strains could be
engineered to increase toxicity and to expand the host range of
microbial insecticides. Ideally, the latter approach would utilize
mosquitocidal toxins that differ in structure and mode of action, which
combined into a recombinant bacterium may help prevent or significantly
delay the development of insecticide resistance.
Bacillus thuringiensis subsp.
jegathesan is a potential alternative to B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis because it
is as toxic to Anopheles stephensi as B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis and is
only slightly less toxic to Aedes aegypti and C. pipiens (10). Furthermore, insecticidal crystals from
B. thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan
contain seven major polypeptides, with molecular masses of 80, 70 to
72, 65, 37, 26, and 16 kDa, which are not related to those produced in
B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis (7). Such complex toxin mixtures may be beneficial in
delaying the onset of resistance, as previously observed with B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis
(3).
The potential of B. thuringiensis subsp.
jegathesan, or any of its component toxins, to be
incorporated into a resistance management program depends upon the
degree of cross-resistance to B. thuringiensis
subsp. israelensis and, especially, upon the degree of
cross-resistance between the component endotoxins. It has previously
been shown that high levels of resistance to the Cry toxins in B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis generally
did not confer significant levels of cross-resistance to B. thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan
(14). However, significant levels of cross-resistance were
detected in the strains resistant to Cry11B, a highly toxic polypeptide
produced by B. thuringiensis subsp.
jegathesan (14). Cry11B is not the major
polypeptide of B. thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan; therefore, other polypeptides in the native
crystal are probably involved in toxicity.
The gene for the 65-kDa protein from B. thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan, cry19A,
has been isolated, sequenced, and expressed (9). The
resulting polypeptide is toxic to C. pipiens, demonstrates a
50% lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.187 µg/ml with
purified inclusions against fourth instars, but shows no activity
against A. aegypti (9). Because Cry19A has no
significant similarity to known B. thuringiensis
toxins, it belongs to a novel class of Five colonies of C. quinquefasciatus were used in this
study. These colonies were CqSyn90, a parental reference
colony that is susceptible to microbial insecticides, and four highly
resistant colonies that were derived from CqSyn90 by
selection with strains of B. thuringiensis that
produce single or multiple B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis toxins (3). The mosquito
colonies and their levels of resistance at concentrations that kill
95% of the population (resistance ratio, [RR]) are Cq4D,
selected with Cry11A (formerly Cry4D) (RR > 7,000);
Cq4AB, selected with Cry4A and Cry4B (RR, 290);
Cq4ABD, selected with Cry4A, Cry4B, and Cry11A (RR, 949); and Cq4ABDCytA, selected with the wild-type preparation
of B. thuringiensis subsp.
israelensis (RR, 12.7) (14). These colonies have been maintained under laboratory selection pressure since 1990.
Cry19A was cloned into B. thuringiensis subsp.
thuringiensis SPL407 as described by Rosso and
Delécluse (9). B. thuringiensis cells were grown in HCT medium
(5) with shaking at 30°C until cell lysis. Spores and
crystals were harvested and washed once in 1 M NaCl and twice in cold,
double-distilled water. Lyophilized spore-crystal powders were used for
all bioassays because of the large amount of material required for
these tests.
Stock suspensions of the lyophilized spore-crystal powder were prepared
in 125-ml flasks with distilled water. Approximately 25 glass beads
were added to the flask, and the suspension was agitated for 5 min with
a vortex mixer. Tenfold serial dilutions were prepared. Stock
suspensions were prepared monthly, and dilutions were made weekly.
Stocks and dilutions were stored at Early-fourth instars from the five mosquito colonies were concurrently
tested with Cry19A spore-crystal powder using the same stocks and
dilutions. Thus, differences in sensitivity to Cry19A among the five
mosquito colonies would be primarily due to their selection regimen and
their resulting resistance spectrum. Twenty larvae were placed in
237-ml plastic cups in 100 ml of deionized water. Ten to 12 different
concentrations of Cry19A suspension, causing mortality between 2 and
98% after 24 h, were used. Bioassays were replicated on five different
days. All data were analyzed with a probit program (2; version 3.3, Praxeme, Saint Georges d'Orques, France). Lethal concentrations with
overlapping fiducial limits were not considered to be significantly
different. RRs were calculated relative to the lethal concentrations
for the susceptible parental strain, CqSyn90.
Cry19A had LC50s and LC95s of 0.978 and 10.1 µg/ml, respectively, for the synthetic parental colony
CqSyn90 (Table 1). The LC50s for three of the four resistant colonies,
Cq4D, Cq4AB, and Cq4ABDCytA, were
1.97, 1.47, and 1.15 µg/ml. These values, as well as their associated
LC95s, were not significantly different from those of the
parental reference colony, CqSyn90. RRs at the LC50 and LC95 for these three resistant
colonies ranged from 0.98 to 2.6. However, for colony
Cq4ABD the LC50 and LC95 were
2.98 and 37.8 µg/ml and the RRs were 3.0 and 3.7, respectively. These values were statistically different from those for
CqSyn90, and the LC50, but not the
LC95, was statistically different from those for
Cq4AB and Cq4ABDCytA.
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.4.1956-1958.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Lack of Cross-Resistance to Cry19A from Bacillus
thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan in Culex
quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) Resistant to Cry Toxins
from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp.
israelensis
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
-endotoxins (9).
The lack of similarity of Cry19A to other mosquitocidal Cry toxins
suggests that it may be useful in resistance management if no
cross-resistance to other Cry toxins is present. Here we report that
Culex quinquefasciatus, with high levels of resistance to
Cry toxins from B. thuringiensis subsp.
israelensis, exhibits little or no cross-resistance to Cry19A.
20°C when not in use.
TABLE 1.
Lethal concentrations of Cry19A from B. thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan for
C. quinquefasciatus strains that are susceptible or
resistant to single or multiple toxins of B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis
The data above indicate that Cry19A was equally toxic to a susceptible colony of C. quinquefasciatus and to three highly resistant colonies derived from that susceptible colony by laboratory selection pressure with combinations of B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis toxins (3). For fourth colony, Cq4ABD, the lethal concentrations were significantly higher. Because these tests were performed concurrently, differences in susceptibility reflect differences in the resistance spectrums of the colonies. Interestingly, in previous tests the Cq4ABD colony showed a similar, and statistically significant, level of cross-resistance to B. thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan, 3.9-fold at the LC50 (14).
Previous tests revealed much higher levels of cross-resistance, from 53.1 to 567 at the LC95, when these same five colonies were tested with Cry11B, another component toxin of B. thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan (14). Therefore, it is probable that the high toxicity of B. thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan, particularly toward the resistant colonies, is due in part to the toxicity of Cry19A. Cry19A is less toxic, 13.8- and 22.9-fold less toxic at the LC50 and LC95, respectively, than the wild-type inclusions of B. thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan. Therefore, it seems likely that other polypeptides in B. thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan also contribute to toxicity toward the resistant colonies, possibly due to additive or synergistic interactions. Synergistic interactions are known to play an important role in the toxicity of B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis (1, 4, 6, 16), and they have been demonstrated to delay the development of resistance to this material (3). Furthermore, synergism between B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis Cry and Cyt toxins has been found to suppress high levels of Cry resistance (15). Because B. thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan also possesses a mixture of Cry and Cyt toxins, such interactions would not be unexpected. However, the contribution of other component toxins to the toxicity of B. thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan, and the interactions among these toxins, must be investigated to confirm this hypothesis.
The lack of biologically significant levels of cross-resistance to
Cry19A in mosquitoes that possess high levels of resistance and
cross-resistance to other mosquitocidal Cry toxins helps explain the
toxicity of B. thuringiensis subsp.
jegathesan toward the resistant colonies. These results also
indicate that the Cry19A polypeptide may be useful as a component toxin
in synthetic combinations intended for resistance management. Further,
the unique characteristics of Cry19A, which placed it in a new class of
-endotoxins, may provide insight into toxin characteristics that are
important for mosquitocidal activity.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by grants from the University of California Mosquito Control Research Program.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Margaret C. Wirth, Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521. Phone: (909) 787-3918. Fax: (909) 787-3086. E-mail: mcwirth{at}mail.ucr.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Crickmore, N.,
E. J. Bone,
J. A. Williams, and D. J. Ellar.
1995.
Contribution of the individual components of the -endotoxin crystal to the mosquitocidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
131:249-254[CrossRef].
|
| 2. | Finney, D. 1971. Probit analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. |
| 3. | Georghiou, G. P., and M. C. Wirth. 1997. Influence of exposure to single versus multiple toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis on development of resistance in the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:1095-1101[Abstract]. |
| 4. |
Ibarra, J., and B. A. Federici.
1986.
Isolation of a relatively nontoxic 65-kilodalton protein inclusion from the parasporal body of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis.
J. Bacteriol.
165:527-533 |
| 5. |
Lecadet, M.-M.,
M.-O. Blondel, and J. Ribier.
1980.
Generalized transduction in Bacillus thuringiensis var. Berliner 1715 using bacteriophage CP-54Ber.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
121:203-212 |
| 6. | Poncet, S., A. Delécluse, A. Klier, and G. Rapoport. 1994. Evaluation of synergistic interactions among CryIVA, CryIVB, and CryIVD toxic components of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis crystals. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 66:131-135[CrossRef]. |
| 7. | Ragni, A., I. Thiéry, and A. Delécluse. 1996. Characterization of six highly mosquitocidal Bacillus thuringiensis strains do not belong to H-14 serotype. Curr. Microbiol. 32:48-54[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | Rao, D. R., T. R. Mani, R. Rajendran, A. S. Joseph, A. Gajanana, and R. Reuben. 1995. Development of a high level of resistance to Bacillus sphaericus in a field population of Culex quinquefasciatus from Kochi, India. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 11:1-5[Medline]. |
| 9. | Rosso, M.-L., and A. Delécluse. 1997. Contribution of the 65-kilodalton protein encoded by the cloned gene cry19A to the mosquitocidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:4449-4455[Abstract]. |
| 10. | Seleena, P., H. L. Lee, and M. M. Lecadet. 1995. A new serovar of Bacillus thuringiensis possessing 28a28c flagellar antigenic structure: Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan, selectively toxic against mosquito larvae. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 11:471-473[Medline]. |
| 11. | Silva-Filha, M.-H., L. Regis, C. Nielsen-LeRoux, and J.-F. Charles. 1995. Low-level resistance to Bacillus sphaericus in a field-treated population of Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 88:525-530. |
| 12. | Sinègre, G., M. Babinot, J.-M. Quermal, and B. Gaven. 1994. First field occurrence of Culex pipiens resistance to Bacillus sphaericus in southern France, p. 17. In Proceedings of the 8th European Meeting of Society for Vector Ecology. Society for Vector Ecology, Santa Ana, Calif. |
| 13. | Thiéry, I., and H. de Barjac. 1989. Selection of the most potent Bacillus sphaericus strains based on activity ratios determined on three mosquito species. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31:577-581[CrossRef]. |
| 14. |
Wirth, M. C.,
A. Delécluse,
B. A. Federici, and W. E. Walton.
1998.
Variable cross-resistance to Cry11B from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan in Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) resistant to single or multiple toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:4174-4179 |
| 15. |
Wirth, M. C.,
G. P. Georghiou, and B. A. Federici.
1997.
CytA enables CryIV endotoxins of Bacillus thuringiensis to overcome high levels of CryIV resistance in the mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:10536-10540 |
| 16. | Wu, D., and F. N. Chang. 1985. Synergism in mosquitocidal activity of 26 and 65 kDa. proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis crystal. FEBS Lett. 190:232-236[CrossRef]. |
| 17. | Yuan, Z., Y. Zhang, Q. Cai, and E.-Y. Liu. 2000. High-level field resistance to Bacillus sphaericus C3-41 in Culex quinquefasciatus from southern China. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 10:41-49[CrossRef]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»